Mike Rowe on Patriotism, Paul Harvey, and American Progress
"We're never going to be finished. Our country is a work in progress," says the producer of the new Something to Stand For documentary.

Podcaster and former Dirty Jobs host Mike Rowe stars in Something to Stand For, a patriotic documentary film in which he tells unknown stories about legendary figures in American history. Reason's Nick Gillespie spoke with Rowe about the film, his influences, and what to think about the decline of patriotism.
Q: Tell us about Something to Stand For.
A: Really all I did was take the format that worked well on the podcast, which was to tell these historical tales through the lens of a mystery while stealing shamelessly from the late, great Paul Harvey. We visited some monuments and memorials, and every few minutes you get another story, another mystery, something you didn't know about somebody you do.
Q: The storytelling is very engaging, but there's always a reveal at the end. At one point you end up at the National Mall, around the World War II Memorial, and you speak with a Korean War vet. What did talking to him bring up in you?
A: That was completely and totally unscripted, unplanned. There I was in the memorial and they've got the X on the ground where I'm supposed to land. The lights are just so. And of course we're behind schedule.
But then this guy rolls in in his wheelchair with nine or 10 other old men and their families. It's an honor flight and they're being wheeled over in front of that wall of stars. Each star is representative, I think, of 100 dead Americans. I looked to the director and I said, "Let's just do this real quick," and grabbed the camera guy. I went over and introduced myself. Guy's name was Andy Michael. He's 91 years old. He fought in Korea, same time as my dad did.
Within seconds, I'm triangulating an impossible set of coincidences with this old man who has tears running down his face as he tries to tell me how grateful he is to be there just in the presence of all of those men and to have his family with him. And then, within seconds, my whole crew migrates over. Suddenly there we are actually Forrest Gumping our way across the most authentic moment that I could hope to find that you simply couldn't script.
Q: You invoked the legendary broadcaster Paul Harvey, who was famous for a radio program called The Rest of the Story, which started right after World War II. He would tell a story and the listener wouldn't know who it was about until the reveal at the end, but it was always something amazing. Talk about Paul Harvey and why you find him inspiring.
A: The way Harvey told stories—and I'd [include] Studs Terkel, George Plimpton, Charles Kuralt—they all really made the stories their own and super personal.
I started writing these things I called The Way I Heard It, which was my rejoinder to The Rest of the Story. Just these little eight-minute mysteries. That format became the podcast.
If I can tell you something you don't know about somebody you do, and you have seven or eight minutes to spend in this little exercise, then I got you. This is a brief mystery for the curious mind with a short attention span. That's what worked for me when I got into the podcast world, and we'll see if it works in the movie space.
Q: How do we acknowledge the failings of the past and the failings of the present while also acknowledging that immense progress has been made?
A: Maybe it's the nature of the binary times that we're in that makes it very, very difficult to applaud one thing without condemning another. I think we're afraid to take a victory lap, and maybe we should be. Maybe that's just a bit premature or arrogant.
We're never going to be finished. Our country is a work in progress. It was formed by imperfect people, and we've done yeoman's work along the way. We are by no means done, but oh my God, look how far we've come. And if we can't take a moment to celebrate that, then I worry.
This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We're never going to be finished.
Uh Mike, the Soviet Union felt that way in 1987 and just a few years later it was gone.
Interesting difference. Socialism could only possibly work if a society were indeed finished in the static sense, like building a house or car. And forcing socialism on a society does finish it in the USSR sense, because societies change regardless of what governments want.
...
With as little fact checking as he was known for?
Amen, Brother! Celebrate the accomplishments and try to learn from the mistakes. Everyone in America today is better off than they would have been back in 1724, 1824 and 1924 - EVERYONE! The Kings and Queens of England were not more secure than a schizophrenic drug-addicted alcoholic street person in Seattle. We learned that women and people of African descent are not second-class humans and deserve equal rights as citizens, and we made it so. We have not yet learned that peaceful cooperation leads to prosperity and peace, and that socialism cannot make outcomes equal. We have not yet learned that laws and government spending programs do not solve social problems. That is the "work in progress" mentioned.
EVERYONE! The Kings and Queens of England were not more secure than a schizophrenic drug-addicted alcoholic street person in Seattle.
How is "secure" the metric we go by when comparing the top .00000000000000005% of society of 1434 to a guy living under a bridge who's pissed himself for the 9th time today?
Paul Harvey, like Bill Stern and Walter Winchell before him, was a manipulative hustler, a big pal of both J. Edgar Hoover and Joe McCarthy, neither of whom are often considered "libertarians". Well, to each his own.
was a manipulative hustler, a big pal of both J. Edgar Hoover and Joe McCarthy, neither of whom are often considered “libertarians”.
You know who else is pals with deep state actors?
Oh, this is always important in the realm of ‘corrective action’. The real story of Joe McCarthy... as not told by the Stalin Stenographers over at the New York Times.
'This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity.'
Also apparently edited to remove any worthwhile content.
Interesting to see Rowe wade into the topic.