Lebanon's Deadliest Day Since October
Plus: Lisbon's pro-natalism, COVID sex parties, raw milk, and more...

Israel attacks Lebanon: Early this morning, the Israeli military struck over 300 sites across Lebanon, aiming at militants with the terrorist group Hezbollah. The strikes killed at least 100 people and injured more than 400. Lebanese authorities say this is the country's deadliest day since this round of fighting started last October.
Yesterday, Hezbollah launched 150 rockets, drones, and missiles into northern Israel, an especially aggressive show of force that they say was in retaliation for Israel's killing of 61-year-old Ibrahim Akil, a top Hezbollah commander, on Friday along with 10 other affiliated militants.
Prior to his death, the U.S. State Department had put a $7 million bounty on Akil's head, due in part to his role in the 1983 bombing of the U.S. embassy in Beirut and in taking American hostages.
This comes on the heels of an attack last Tuesday, most likely linked to Israel, in which thousands of pagers exploded simultaneously across Lebanon and Syria, killing 12 (mostly members of Hezbollah, though two young children perished as well) and injuring many others.
"A day after these deadly explosions, more detonations triggered in Beirut and parts of Lebanon Wednesday—including several blasts heard at a funeral in Beirut for three Hezbollah members and a child killed by Tuesday's explosions," reports the Associated Press, which notes that at least 25 additional people were killed and more than 600 wounded.
"We are at the start of a new phase in the war," Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said on Wednesday.
Trump gains in Arizona: New polling from The New York Times/Siena College finds that Republican nominee Donald Trump has gained a bit more of a lead in Arizona while maintaining his lead in Georgia, both states won by Joe Biden in 2020. One swing state to watch right now? Traditionally red North Carolina, where Democratic nominee Kamala Harris is closing the gap between herself and her opponent.
Arizona is particularly interesting because Harris appears to have a Latino voter problem. The same poll, back in August, "found Ms. Harris leading by five percentage points." It's Latinos who've seemingly moved away from Harris, "though a significant number—10 percent—said they were now undecided," reports the Times. Interestingly, the Democratic candidate for Senate, Ruben Gallego, is polling well there despite Trump's lead, suggesting a fair number of voters may split their tickets this time around.
Scenes from Lisbon: Some softcore pro-natalism from the Lisbon airport. If you did not travel with a stroller, you may borrow one there, free of charge (and leave it at your gate when you board). If you're traveling with a small child, you get to go through special expedited customs, security, and passport control lines. In fact, people are kind of cutely offended if you don't take them up on this; it's culturally important to let families go first. After traveling through Portugal and Cabo Verde (formerly a Portuguese colony), I am grateful for the small ways this culture attempts to make everyday tasks easier for families with young kids.

QUICK HITS
- On the disappearance of religion/faith from elections.
- "A House committee focused on threats from China argued in a report released on Monday that U.S. federal research funding had helped to advance Chinese technologies with military applications, helping to fuel a potential national security rival to the United States," reports The New York Times.
- It could simply be that I've been offline, vacationing, for too long and that I've missed much of the analysis. But is anyone else a little alarmed by the relative quiet following a second attempt on Donald Trump's life? The would-be assassin, Ryan Routh, doesn't appear to be as ideological as one might expect, mostly fired up by the war in Ukraine rather than domestic politics.
- In case you missed it: Zach Weissmueller and I talk Gender Queer, book bans, and school curricula with Erika Sanzi.
- Did you know that federal law prohibits selling raw milk across state lines? I did not, until reading this. More on the laws by state here.
- American taxpayers are forced to pay for…COVID tests? Does anyone even do those anymore?
- Speaking of, in competition for the worst headline I have ever seen: "Public-Health Officials Should Have Been Talking About Their Sex Parties the Whole Time." I do not want to know about the horniness of tyrants, and I think that COVID-policy architects deserve accountability for their wrongdoing.
- "Sometimes, the best thing a parent can do is nothing at all," writes Russell Shaw in The Atlantic, making the case for how parents can and should step back to improve kids' outcomes (and their own).
- Paglia rarely misses:
Camille Paglia explains the fundamental contradiction of modern liberalism pic.twitter.com/8gn4eioLq2
— Jash Dholani (@oldbooksguy) September 22, 2024
- Where's the lie:
in many ways mark robinson is the most american politician of them all. a stone cold pervert with zero social awareness and an enormously undeserved ego. extremely racist in ways that don't even make sense. addicted to hardcore pornography. like it or not, he is our avatar
— america's lounge singer (@KrangTNelson) September 19, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Kamala Harris
Not interested in Emhoff's sloppy seconds.
And in terms of influential CA figures...sloppy god-knows-how-many
I really don't think there are a lot of takers for that any more. She wouldn't even be a fluffer at a Diddy FreakOff.
Emhoff's recent take on his wife:
During remarks on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” Emhoff said it was unfair to blame Harris for the many failures her administration caused over the past three and a half years.
“She’s the vice president, not the president. The vice president is there as part of the administration, not leading the administration,” Emhoff claimed. “So as president, she’s gonna be able to put forth her policies and plans and effectuate those.”
This 100% ignores situations like the border (from BBC.com):
Announcing Ms Harris's appointment as his immigration czar, Mr Biden told reporters and officials at the White House: "She's the most qualified person to do it, to lead our efforts with Mexico and the Northern Triangle [Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador], and the countries that are going to need help in stemming the movement of so many folks - stemming the migration to our southern border".
Mr Biden said Ms Harris's past work as California's attorney general made her well suited to leading the effort, adding: "When she speaks, she speaks for me."
Meanwhile, Harris running mate says
“They want to tell you that [you should] just get over it; it's a fact of life. This is the way it is,” he said. “[Harris] simply has said it doesn't have to be this way. It doesn't have to be this way. We can't afford four more years of this."
Which demands the question: What has Harris been doing for the last four years? She IS the 'four more years of this' of which he speaks.
Timpon is an idiot. Just another impeachment insurance policy.
I've never paid much attention to historical VPs. I know the ticket-balancing act. How many have been protection against impeachment? I don't mean anyone since, say 1950. I'm more curious about the 1800s.
There was never a real "protection against impeachment" aspect to this until Y2K and Bush convincing Cheney to sign on. Most VP choices up to then were far more focused on ticket balancing and trying to appeal to large regional populations.
American mobility and the clear re-sorting along politically sectional lines means that sort of thing isn't going to happen again for a while. There's really no point in nominating a VP from a state controlled by the opposition, because people don't have the same kind of attachments to their home states that they did 50 years ago that might have influenced their vote. The Solid South showing out for Carter when he ran for President is really the last time we've seen that in action.
"Announcing Ms Harris’s appointment as his immigration czar"
Doesnt everyone know she is a border hawk who prosecuted trans-national gangs?!?! She grew up middle class also!
In essence, she wants credit for any perceived 'good' things during the Biden administration but also doesn't want any of the blame for the 'bad' things during the Biden administration.
Seems obvious to me, anyway.
Good thing the press doesn't give a fuck and refuses to ask her any questions because they are terrified she might answer them honestly.
Thirds. You forget the nanny.
Can we expect this to be the first comment for the next four years.
Only if the fortification kicks in.
Will it have to kick in? Will Trump accept a lose or will Democrats have to fight to protect people’s votes?
I don't know.
At least with "FJB" we know the intent, but Kammy Kamal physically, literally humped her way to where she is today by fucking important sugar daddies.
That brings a whole new perspective to the proposal.
Stuff the box. Erections matter.
No. I will remain one of the few who have not.
Israel attacks Lebanon
Israelis pounce.
Honestly, they should just put out a statement of
"We will chill out and stop pushing your shit in, effective immediately. But the second one single rocket is fired from a territory or country that isn't Israel, we will carpet bomb that country completely into the stone age. You have been warned."
They have suffered these backward savages for far too long. You have the lesser military and cant stop yourselves from non stop attacks? Well, sorry you got deleted, but cant say you didnt beg for it.
First, it is good to have Liz Wolfe back! Yay!
WRT Israel, I think an impirtant piece left out was that since 10/8/23, Hezball-less judeocidal terrorists have launched >8K missiles at Israel. That is an act of war, any way you cut it.
The Night of The Thousand Bris' (aka Beeper Blasts) was a military attack on the command and control of Hezball-less. And in a stunningly successful attack, managing to wound thousands of hezball-less terrorists, emasculate about 1K more (how fitting), and force their leadership out in the open...to be killed.
Remote castration by detonation.
First, it is good to have Liz Wolfe back! Yay!
White Mike hardest hit.
Prog logic: Well since it wasn't 100% accurate as a few civilians were hurt or killed, that was a war crime. Also, Hezbollah launching a few hundred semi-guided missiles in the general direction of a military target, hitting mostly civilian targets is perfectly okay.
Prior to his death, the U.S. State Department had put a $7 million bounty on Akil's head...
Does Israel get the money?
Israel always gets the money.
10% for the big guy.
I want to know where you find this list of who has a bounty on them. Just out of curiosity you know
Post the list!
Does Israel get the money?
Of course not. Paying allies if they happen to eliminate our mutual enemies through actions of self-defense or retaliation? What kind of unprincipled capitalist, non-interventionist, non-initiation-of-aggression republic do you take us for? That money is already earmarked for easing the burdens of the people in Iran and the Ukraine.
Wipe them out. All of them.
/Darth Sidious
This comes on the heels of an attack last Tuesday, most likely linked to Israel, in which thousands of pagers exploded simultaneously...
They're going to be so embarrassed telling that cause of death to St. Peter.
From the liver to the knee.
+10
ya funny
Fist, nobody knows who really did the deed.
I personally like the theory that The Almighty, wielding Ya'akov patish (Jacob's Hammer), smote the bastards Himself. And crushed their balls where he missed. 😉
Maybe Apple did it? Pretty suspicious that I'm not hearing about THEIR pagers blowing up. Very suspicious indeed.
Apple wants a monopoly on the pager market.
I quite enjoyed the joke of Muslims showing up and answering to Saint Peter.
The jokes write themselves.
I WRITE THE JOKES.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13874467/Diddy-White-Parties-drugs-snorted-bodies-topless-women.html
Diddy in deep doo doo. Wonder how many other celebrities will go down with him, no pun intended.
Sarc only talks about ideas, not people. Therefore, this post does not exist.
Was this story vetted by Hamas?
Based on Epstein, probably none. They won't suicide him unless he actually threatens to name names in court, and it's probably immaterial anyway because there's countless photos of the celebrities who went to the public side of his parties. Diddy running some Eyes Wide Shut type of debauched celebrity sex cult is the most unsurprising thing ever.
Just don't mention how deep in Democrat politics he was.
Red....Puff Daddy was nowhere near as smart as Epstein. I promise you, the list will come out. So will other stuff. Stay tuned. We are about to confirm many of our worst beliefs about celebrities.
Smart has nothing to do with Rapestein. It has everything to do with extremely powerful men not wanting their shit to come out.
The list will be hacked, for sure. The videos will come out.
I honestly have zero faith a single name nor video will ever come out.
Take away Hollywood and the Dems have lost a ton of their support generating capacity.
Stay tuned, that is all I will say.
We'll see, but I doubt it. If Epstein's list didn't get leaked, Diddy's won't either.
Most of these dipshits like Ashton Kutcher and LeBron James already told on themselves, while Ben Affleck is probably breathing a sigh of relief that his marriage to JLo fell apart just in time.
But Diddy has much more money than Epstein ever did and is much more famous. The fact that maybe 10% ( at most) of the population knew who Epstein was but probably 90% know Diddy will make it harder to bury the story. You know every entertainment outlet is going to report on the story 24/7 and that will generate a lot more interest in who was involved than was the case for Epstein.
They won’t suicide him
Is that why they have him on suicide watch?
unless he actually threatens to name names in court
The last thing these people want is their names getting out. I suspect Diddy only got arrested because the video of him beating his girlfriend finally made him too much of a liability to tolerate anymore.
Even made men can get whacked if they cause the bosses too many problems.
He will likely get Epsteined --- so I am assuming none.
Too many of them are WAY too tight with Democrats for embarrassing crap like that to come out.
Welcome back, Liz.
^This +100
Amen!
Yes welcome back. Enjoyed the column.
Amen.
We definitely missed you.
Yes...x1000. Welcome back.
Your pinch hitters totally whiffed, Ms. Wolfe.
Liz herself only bats something like .220, but it's definitely better than the pinch hitters who struck out at every turn.
Arizona is particularly interesting because Harris appears to have a Latino voter problem.
Kamala is currently learning Spanish for phony.
I'm interested to hear her code-switching Hispanic accent and attempts to use vernacular.
"Trump es no cholo, meng. No bueno presidento."
Here you go. Last week.
https://www.outkick.com/analysis/kamala-harris-debuts-brand-new-hispanic-accent-during-campaign-speech
God damn. I was expecting it to be bad, but Kamala exceeded my expectations.
As stupid as she is, I'm hoping she'll mix up the fake accents and use them for the wrong crowds.
White reporters are learning that hispanics don't like blacks.
She is going to start doing rallies in Phoenix sounding like Tony Montana so it's all good.
Did you know that federal law prohibits selling raw milk across state lines? I did not, until reading this. More on the laws by state here.
Yes, because there is a Remy video about it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHX-XqAoDKs
https://reason.com/2023/02/25/state-lawmakers-help-farmers-by-improving-consumer-access-to-raw-milk/
...it's culturally important to let families go first.
The Portuguese war on singles continues unabated.
That's the way I see it.
Take care of your own kids. You did the crime, you do the time.
re: the contradiction of modern liberalism...
There is no contradiction to them, its just more of their double standard.
They want the govt to act as a tyrant-father cracking down on the wrong think of their enemies, while being a permissive/nurturing nanny-mother and providing all of the ever expanding list of "human rights" that now include everything from iphones, internet, food, shelter, healthcare, and just about everything most people accepted as their own responsibility for all of time.
Other nitpick, is this is why it isnt "liberalism", and we need to abandon calling it that. Its modern progressivism, and its basically just a new coat of paint on the same old hyper-socialism (communism) they have clamored for that installs an authoritarian govt to benefit the "good people" and punish wrong thinkers.
I agree, with one minor nitpick: they've set us up to become an authoritarian fascist state, in the sense of Italian fascism. You'll still have big business and big tech ostensibly owning their companies, but control of those companies will be by the party-selected few who run the government. Despite the name of the CCP, China today is more of a fascist system to me. That's what I think many on the left want to replicate in America.
On the disappearance of religion/faith from elections.
For the faithful it's slim pickings with today's candidates. They're not even trying to fake it.
Faith isn't disappearing from elections, I'd say faith in elections is as strong as ever. It's between the hours of 4 pm and 10 am, do you *know* where *your* President is?
Arizona is particularly interesting because Harris appears to have a Latino voter problem. The same poll, back in August, "found Ms. Harris leading by five percentage points." It's Latinos who've seemingly moved away from Harris, "though a significant number—10 percent—said they were now undecided," reports the Times.
Maybe the strategic influx of illegal aliens as Democrat voters isn't working out as planned? If Trump garners any significant portion of Latino votes, I expect Democrats to rush to man the bulwarks at the border.
-------------------
Just Facts, a nonprofit research institute, “found that about 10% to 27% of non-citizen adults in the U.S. are now illegally registered to vote,” an overview of the study states.
“The U.S. Census recorded more than 19 million adult non-citizens living in the U.S. during 2022,” it says. “Given their voter registration rates, this means that about two million to five million of them are illegally registered to vote. These figures are potentially high enough to overturn the will of the American people in major elections, including congressional seats and the presidency.”
Maybe the strategic influx of illegal aliens as Democrat voters isn’t working out as planned? If Trump garners any significant portion of Latino votes, I expect Democrats to rush to man the bulwarks at the border.
If Trump discovers he’s wrong and immigrants aren’t all left-handed-leftist-marxist-leftist Democrats, I wonder if he’ll change his deeply principled stance on immigration.
Hey lets not exaggerate. No one is calling them left handed.
Shall we check in on Nevada?
https://x.com/real_robn/status/1836818113498862075
Just Facts, a nonprofit research institute, “found that about 10% to 27% of non-citizen adults in the U.S. are now illegally registered to vote,” an overview of the study states.
Just facts finding is based on a study published in 2014 “Do non-citizens vote in U.S. elections?”
( https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379414000973 ).
This did indeed find nearly 20% of non-citizen immigrants are registered to vote. It was also thoroughly debunked here “The Perils of Cherry Picking Low Frequency Events in Large Sample Surveys ” (https://cces.gov.harvard.edu/news/perils-cherry-picking-low-frequency-events-large-sample-surveys )
The jist: They surveyed a total of 32,800 in 2008 and 55,400 in 2010 which found total non-citizens of 339 in 2008, 489 in 2010. So about 1%. But it was a box checking survey and some people check the wrong boxes. So out of the ~90,000 survey takers if only 0.2% checked the wrong box that they are non-citizens, poof there’s your 20% of non-citizen voters and the explanation for why this study estimates a rate 1000 times higher than other studies looking at this question.
No widespread fraud.
Wait a minute...do I detect sarcasm? Can't be.
Meh. Take it or leave it. It's just some sound baffling in the echo chamber.
Also worth nothing: it is based on a survey. The study isn't based on actually going through voter registration records and seeing who is a citizen and who isn't.
It is also worth examining the survey instrument itself. If the survey instrument asked "are you registered to vote?" then the non-citizens who were registered to vote in their home country would have likely checked yes, even if they are not registered to vote in the US.
Also, some places DO allow non-citizens to vote in local elections only. One can argue the wisdom of this, but it is also not the same as being registered to vote for federal elections (illegal). So asking if a non-citizen is "registered to vote" may or may not be illegal even in the US.
This is a speculative survey at best, and certainly does not constitute proof that non-citizens are voting in federal elections that would withstand scrutiny in a court of law. But it is useful to scare the rubes into thinking that the illegulz are stealing their votes as well as their jobs.
Don't forget too that survey results are generally crap. Unless they confirm biases. Then they can't be wrong.
Now you pretend to care? Fuck off, you've been fully approving of every election fraud mechanism to date.
What's the probability it was all people selecting the wrong box? Seems quite the assumption to get a desired result.
And if this is the case, how secure is voting registration that simply requires checking a box?
We already know the issues with motor voter registrations coming to light. Arizona just had an issue of 100k voters never providing proof of citizenship for state elections.
No one is claiming that ALL the responses were people choosing the wrong box. The point is that when you extrapolate tiny numbers with relatively large margins of error to huge populations, you magnify the error tremendously.
No one is claiming that ALL the responses
Never change, Lying Jeffey.
What’s the probability it was all people selecting the wrong box?
I don't know, but it's irrelevant.
Seems quite the assumption to get a desired result.
OK. So lets discard that assumption, which is easy because it was never made. Nothing changes.
"20 respondents reported being citizens in 2010 and non-citizens in 2012."
Well that's weird.
I mean I just listed 1000 without valid proof. In the 2022 time frame before democrats blocked an Arizona law to check citizenship of those who voted, they identified over 300. Believe it was Portland who admitted to 300 just a few months back.
This is the problem. The disallowing of validation of citizenship or even investigating.
If we used the same behaviors for jaywalking you could claim nobody ever jaywals, yet see it weekly if not daily.
So do you actually believe your 20 number? I sure as he'll don't.
Either you misunderstood what that 20 number is (survey respondents answering with an impossible combination of answers proving errors were made in the survey) or I am misunderstanding your comment.
If you are telling me there's 1000, 2000 or 10,000 immigrants illegally registered to vote in the US, this is a believable number to me. The article above claims up to 25٪ of non citizen immigrants are illegally registered to vote, which is obvious bullshit.
...U.S. federal research funding had helped to advance Chinese technologies with military applications, helping to fuel a potential national security rival to the United States...
We needed to spend those federal dollars building up the Chinese military so that we could spend more federal dollars building up our military to defend against it.
(Also, they own the White House, so...)
But is anyone else a little alarmed by the relative quiet following a second attempt on Donald Trump's life? The would-be assassin, Ryan Routh, doesn't appear to be as ideological as one might expect, mostly fired up by the war in Ukraine rather than domestic politics.
Nelson says he's 100% a conservative.
Nelson would say the same about the DOJ, who conveniently published Routh’s bounty offer for Trump’s assassination.
That's odd, because they refused to release the Covenant School shooter's manifesto, for fear that it might 'inspire more shootings'.
He is a Bernie Bro.
I have rather come to expect violence against someone on the Right to be played down and memory holed. It is concerning but it is SOP for our current news media.
It’s pretty creepy how political assassination is being normalized (at least when it’s going one way).
As evidenced by the financial support to Act Blue, the Biden-Harris bumper sticker on the truck parked at his house in Hawaii, his recent social media post supporting Biden, his son’s reported statement to media, and being armed in proximity to DJT when he had no business being on the golf course during an unadvertised visit by DJT.
Dude left a note saying it was an assasination attempt and offering a reward for anyone "Finishing the job" as well.
Definitely a mainstream conservative, or so I've heard from CNN.
But is anyone else a little alarmed by the relative quiet following a second attempt on Donald Trump's life?
Why bother. It's not like we're going to get anything close to the truth about this one, either.
Why would the DOJ publish a hit on a former president and current POTUS candidate?
They're going for the "Boy Who Cried Wolf" ending.
Until proven otherwise I'm assuming it was the Biden regime exercising their newfound powers of assassinating opponents as a Presidential power.
"But is anyone else a little alarmed by the relative quiet following a second attempt on Donald Trump's life?"
Alarmed by that, more alarmed that the majority of the MSM's official response was "ya but that's what he gets for saying something mean"
The narrative is to blame “Trump’s rhetoric.”
Did you know that federal law prohibits selling raw milk across state lines?
Just like the Founders intended.
I think if you cross with an AR15 at the same time it cancels out. Double-freedom
Used correctly, an AR15 cancels a lot of things.
An Act Blue donor tried canceling Trump with one.
“Some softcore pro-natalism from the Lisbon airport”
Did anyone else’s brain see those letters “softcore pro-n” in a slighty different order? Not to mention the Leson reference...
Thought there was going to be some sort of hot girl-on-girl action, and not a discussion of baby strollers.
Did anyone else’s brain see those letters “softcore pro-n”
For about half a second, ya. Swiftly disappointed though.
Still waiting for Liz to make up for those god-awful Carnival pictures from earlier this year.
I absolutely had that happen when I first read it. I feel a little better about myself for not being the only one.
American taxpayers are forced to pay for…COVID tests? Does anyone even do those anymore?
Home kits? Sure we do, whenever we need an excuse to get out of doing something.
Ya, even the most lefty places in our town have gone to the "I mean if you basically arent actively dying you can probably come to work" system the rest of the country adopted around omicron
I went out barhopping Friday and saw a couple holding hands while wearing masks. Haven't seen that in a while.
sometimes I run out of smashing my head emojis.
Doesn't stop true libertarians from defending Australia locking up citizens sans trial even when they test negative.
Just do a google image search for a covid test; "negative" or "positive", depending on your needs.
I'm saving my free Biden Test Kit so that in a few years after everyone else has used theirs mine will be worth millions as a mint condition collectable.
Why haven’t you used your tests? Do you want grandma to die?
Profits over People!
I never got a taxpayer paid Covid test kit. Don't know why. But I think I saw Ron Bailey hanging around my mailbox that week.
Moar testing needed!
Do the old tests still work anymore?
Yes. 100%
I am grateful for the small ways this culture attempts to make everyday tasks easier for families with young kids.
Want to make things really easy for yourself? Stop traveling with children.
People say there's nothing good about getting old, but there is this and not giving a shit about what anyone thinks.
I now have just one goal left for my life: never EVER change another diaper.
Except your own.
Yep, nobody thinks it will happen to them.
Did you see my AR15 comment above? This is a problem that can be cancelled by an AR too.
Carpe Biem
Squeeze The Day
"Public-Health Officials Should Have Been Talking About Their Sex Parties the Whole Time."
We all would have been better off if public health officials would have just said their advice and dictates in the space between the tiddies they were motorboating and left the rest of us alone.
I would’ve respected mandates to cover your face with cleavage more than 'My mask protects you. Your mask protects me.'
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/09/20/kentucky-judge-mullins-shooting-sheriff-stines/
The headline for the article starts with "Police Seek Motive..."
Did they not consult Eric Boehm? He already knew it was "political violence" in Friday's Roundup.
Repost from that:
“Political violence watch: A Kentucky sheriff was arrested after shooting and killing a district judge in the Letcher County Courthouse.”
Not so much political violence as “violence among politicians”.
https://x.com/indigogirl222/status/1836879648401019046
Allegedly Judge Mullins was sleeping with sheriff Stines’s 17 year old daughter. According to people outside chambers during the shooting, the sheriff yelled “YOU FUCKED MY DAUGHTER,” before firing at and killing Judge Mullins.
That post on X has been deleted.
Check mastodon.
What is the age of consent there?
Kentucky? Well, if it's first cousins, then...
You mistakened Kentucky for Iceland.
Are you saying that Icelandic men bjørk their sisters?
My guess is Liz also know bohem is a sub human cancer
Yo, the other Rev Arthur seems to have disappeared. Did you whack him, or something?
When I started, I parodied him and out reved him. Holding up a mirror to the Marxists makes the run away
Once a critical mass of people have you on mute, even the most incoherent bigoted remarks with homo-erotic undertones (he always wants to shove things down someone's throat) don't get any reactions...because no one sees them. I assumed this leads to him going away, or maybe he went down the Hinh way.
Maybe he was arrested for trying to shove something down someone's throat.
Two words: Ryan. Routh.
But is anyone else a little alarmed by the relative quiet following a second attempt on Donald Trump’s life?
I’ve been told repeatedly that the would-be assassin was conservative; what else do you need to know?
MSM: "2 things you need to know. Assassin is a Republican, and Trump deserved it anyways...moving on, Harris sparks more Joy(TM) everywhere she goes!"
the left says we aren't hearing anything because it was another staged attempt by Trump. and yes they think the first one was staged also and that the dead people are just collateral damage
And so many of the left are just apoplectic that the first guy missed.
WSJ compares Donnie's economic plan to Bernie Sanders:
Trump’s Price Controls on Credit Cards
He wants to cap interest rates at 10%. Is this the Sanders campaign?
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/donald-trump-credit-card-interest-cap-10-percent-new-york-rally-4f0dd47b?mod=opinion_lead_pos3
Restrict food imports? Donnie plan. High tariffs? check. Federal board to set property insurance rates? That's Donnie.
10% max on credit card interest?
Who is the communist?
Remember when you posted a story about a fast food loss-leader promotion as proof that prices were coming down?
What do you suggest Donnie's National Price Board set as a price for a Big Mac Meal?
turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
No, I suggest you seek euthanasia.
Say Pluggo. Remember when you claimed price fluctuations in precious metals was proof that inflation was over?
You still holding that Tesla short?
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Why aren’t the Trump defenders going on the attack to defend this? Very strange.
Why do you never criticize democrats in articles critical of them? Weird hypocrisy from you.
This was commented on a few days ago when it was first brought up dummy.
In your weird mind this is probably the same as price controls from Kamala too.
The king of binary thinking shows us how it’s done.
Failure to refute the lies and false premises in that comment is not tacit agreement with the lies and false premises.
Count: 6
Incorrect use: 5
Nonsensical use: 1
Want me to go through the last 10 articles negative of Democrats again buddy?
Defending Trump by accusing someone of supporting Harris, your secondary mode of attack, is the very definition of binary thinking.
Your primary mode of attack, making up stuff to explain what was not said or done and then arguing against it, is called a strawman.
Lying and claiming the person pointing these things out doesn't know what they're talking about is called gaslighting.
Keep showing us how it’s done.
Wow. What a weird non sequitur you listed. Where did I say you defended Kamala? I stated you don't criticize democrats in articles critical of them idiot.
What grade level is your reading comprehension at?
Speaking of raw milk, looks like Trump is poised to win the Amish vote in PA. No shit. The Amish vote.
https://twitter.com/ScottPresler/status/1837474679088410823?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1837474679088410823%7Ctwgr%5E98791167a48c46766c6fbc56fcefda95e38aeb62%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Frevolver.news%2Fnewsfeed%2F
There's even an Amish influencer out there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoSuF1VlkHM
There’s something amish about that.
lol exactly how are the Amish on UTube?
Some orders allow filming. It likely would be another editing and posting the content. There are a few with cellphones where their spouse and perhaps the elders would have access to ensure it was being used for just family-business.
fascinating. we were Irish Mennonites once but it’s been centuries so the ways were not continued lol.
Within the past year, there seems to have been a push on YT for some folks to make docu-vids on their culture. Used to work with a couple of Mennonite and have a few Amish families nearby.
Sometimes it is folks that grew up that way and turned to the “English” world but still retain much of the old ways.
The best thing about an Amish woman? No penis.
And they can cook.
also fascinating.
That guy has a beard with a mustache so he's clearly OK with being shunned and burning in Hell.
Think my favorite voting news is GA making counties count the total number of ballots received so they can show votes actually came from received ballots. The left is freaking out about this simple vote verification. Wonder why?
Georgia:
https://apnews.com/article/georgia-state-election-board-rules-da1f271f360b15353abebdf9ff183b3d
The freak out.
https://www.rawstory.com/georgia-election-hand-count/
'Off the deep end': MAGA-controlled election board ruling stuns lawmakers and experts
Maddow was railing against this is a far right attempt to delay counts over the weekend.
Apparently counting the number of voters who vote is bad and MAGA.
Remember how your team believes that if election results are not instantaneous, it gives opportunities for Team Blue to manipulate the tally in the middle of the night as the counting drags on?
Apparently, that type of paranoid thinking is only relevant for Team Red. Team Blue is not allowed to have such paranoid thinking when it comes to potential shenanigans by Team Red to delay the tally of election results by "hand counting every ballot" (which takes time).
Shorter Jesse: "My paranoid fears are justified, THEIR paranoid fears are stupid and laughable".
Both teams have stupid paranoid fears that ought to be laughed away. But, here we are.
Apparently you’ve memory holed that dead of night ballot dumps 95% for Biden and mixed in with the other hourly counts was exactly what was done by your team blue in 2020 as reported in the hourly totals. How is reported reality a conspiracy theory?
I didnt see all this, but ELI5 here...
1. Why do the R's want this, if the concern is the egregious 2am dump of 100k Biden mail in votes. Wouldn't those votes still get manually counted? I just dont see how this changes anything personally.
2. Why do the D's care about this, said 2am ballot dumps are *already* delaying the count / result, as they did in GA and PA in 2020, actually producing a scenario where the result appears to be in for the R, and then after a long delayed count... from trucks full of Biden ballots...the result flips. This already delays everything, and looks sketch AF, as it is.
Truly am not up to date on this one
It counts the number of ballots received. The counters at 2am do not receive ballots. They are already processed ballots. Verified through the system.
They just count votes at 2am. This would stop magic votes from appearing. Like the 15k without ballot images from Fulton in 2020.
If 50k ballots are received and accounted for, hard to report 75k votes.
I'm not sure if our local IA/MO Amish vote very regularly, but there's not a one of them I have met that would ever vote for Kamala.
Onve again, we have an example of envitonmentalists' animus against the American people.
https://apnews.com/article/california-plastic-bag-ban-406dedf02b416ad2bb302f498c3bce58
They get the government they deserve, and they get it good and hard.
Build the wall. Around California.
And DC.
Fair.
The Three Mile Island reactor reboot was hilarious over the weekend.
It went from "America's Chernobyl" to "those dirty capitalists at Microsoft" in one day. Leftists just gotta hate/fear something.
Wait what?! Trump gets a Muslim endorsement in Wayne County MI.
https://twitter.com/_johnnymaga/status/1837969971621564570?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1837969971621564570%7Ctwgr%5E58c504e4c416feef82d18d833a78d0b7e2dc555b%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Frevolver.news%2F2024%2F09%2Fnever-seen-anything-like-this-latest-trump-endorsement-so-crazy-we-did-a-triple-take%2F
Oh yeah? Kamala has the IRS, IC, and Dick Cheney.
Over 700 Deep Staters Join Dick Cheney, Iran, And IRS Union In Endorsing Harris
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/over-700-deep-staters-join-and-dick-cheney-iran-and-irs-union-harris-endorsement
Like a dozen of those names were on the false hunter laptop letter.
And the NLCA, which is critical for fortifying mail-in balloting.
It could simply be that I've been offline, vacationing, for too long and that I've missed much of the analysis. But is anyone else a little alarmed by the relative quiet following a second attempt on Donald Trump's life? The would-be assassin, Ryan Routh, doesn't appear to be as ideological as one might expect, mostly fired up by the war in Ukraine rather than domestic politics.
What assassination attempt?
Trumps rhetoric is what caused the attempt.
He donated 20 times to act blue, so if he was political he was a conservative.
He just released a letter from jail offering 150k to kill Trump and the media advertised the offer.
Trump could fake his death, claim the 150K, then pop back up and call the guy a looser.
He just released a letter from jail offering 150k to kill Trump and the media advertised the offer.
And the fucking DOJ. They released the letter.
JesseAZ...There are very powerful interests that want Pres Trump dead, or completely incapacitated.
Eisenhower was right, he called it.
" doesn’t appear to be as ideological as one might expect, mostly fired up by the war in Ukraine rather than domestic politics."
How exactly are his views on Ukraine not ideological? The neocons have moved en masse to the Democrat party. The entire deep state is terrified that Trump will disrupt their racket by getting a negotiated settlement in Ukraine and this guy set out to neutralize the threat. But they're not ideologues?
"What assassination attempt?"
Just the lamest assassination attempt in the history of assassination attempts. The guy never pointed his rifle at Trump let alone took a shot at him. Just a patriotic gun owner taking a stroll around a golf course as the Founding Fathers intended.
mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
"Spouting nonsense is an end in itself."
FOAD, asshole.
Israel's killing of 61-year-old Ibrahim Akil, a top Hezbollah commander
Sorry for your loss.
Some people did some things, is how I've seen it explained.
But was he an austere religious scholar?
Just the lamest assassination attempt in the history of assassination attempts.
Your beloved AOC holds this title. 1/6/2021
"Just a patriotic gun owner taking a stroll around a golf course as the Founding Fathers intended."
Just one of those casual strolls that involves waiting in some bushes for 12 hours. Very common.
During an unadvertised visit by DJT. Wonder how that intel got to Act Blue donor number 2.
Who even admitted to attempting an assassination.
And is willing to pay for another.
"Just one of those casual strolls that involves waiting in some bushes for 12 hours."
The lamest assassination attempt in the history of lame assassination attempts gets even lamer.
That makes it okay then right?
The lamer the better. And this one was as lame as it gets, don't you agree?
Next guy thinks he's gonna be able to collect that bounty?
AP
Feds: Man accused in apparent assassination attempt left note indicating he intended to kill Trump
“This was an assassination attempt on Donald Trump but I failed you. I tried my best and gave it all the gumption I could muster. It is up to you now to finish the job; and I will offer $150,000 to whomever can complete the job,” the note said, according to prosecutors.
Whomever? Must be a Democrat.
Your hamas and hezball-less homies having a rough time, misconstrueman?
They'll die soon enough. They will be hunted down like the human animals they are, and killed.
Nasrallah, Sinwar and a bunch of others should start looking over their shoulder. Death is coming.
Say their names!
Gleefully, as they die = say their names
And fervently hope they are riding that one-way Allah train to paradise, which for them is a shitty, dirty, dung heap.
Don't hold back on my account.
misconstrueman, I don't. And I rarely pass up the opportunity to tweak antisemitic pieces of shit like you.
I just have grey boxes.
Thank you for your candor and your attention.
We know last week was a rough one for your side.
The last 75 years have been tough. The struggle continues.
We know seeing successful jews build a free country and live in prosperity is tough; it makes people like you seethe with anger.
Jews of Israel are under attack, live in fear, and are killed daily. Your envy of them is misplaced. It remains free only as long as Americans are willing pay their bills.
“Jews of Israel are under attack, live in fear, and are killed daily.”
...By your side. And yet in spite of all this, they have built a free country where they can live and be successful, while your allies live in squalor and under dictatorships of their own making.
"…By your side. "
That's inevitable when conflicts turn violent. It may seem unfair to you. But you'll have ample chance to get used to it as it doesn't appear to be ending any time soon.
How does it feel that your compatriots didn't think you were worth giving a pager?
We all have our priorities.
mtrueman, it'd be nice if you would prioritize fighting alongside your allies, or volunteer as a human shield at the least.
You don't win wars by being nice.
The Founding Fathers frowned on trespassing. And attempted murder.
That's why we love them.
>>mostly members of Hezbollah, though two young children perished as well
don’t be a terrorist but if one must be a terrorist don’t take one's children to work.
Pager so presumably not at work. That said, maybe keep the pager you use to conduct terrorism at home in a locked safe where the kids can't get to it.
good plan. I assume membership in Hizbollah is mafiaesque where there is no time off?
The classic saying
If Muslims loved their children more then they hate others there would be peace in the middle east
^^^
>>"We are at the start of a new phase in the war," Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said
the "yeah let's stop letting Blinken in the room" phase
>>suggesting a fair number of voters may split their tickets this time around.
or the polls are baloney.
Just remember, the Team Red logic at work:
Mean Words from Team Blue inspire Team Blue crazies to take a shot at Trump.
Mean Words from Trump inspire Team Blue crazies to call Trump Hitler and to lose their shit about him.
But Mean Words from Trump never inspire Team Blue crazies to take a shot at Trump. That's just crazy talk!
mean words from Trump?
Yeah you're right. When he refers to fellow citizens as "vermin", that's not mean at all. He's just speaking the truth!
Meanwhile, Hillary calls some citizens "deplorables" and that's totally unacceptable, beyond the pale, and demonstrates how much she hates real Muricans.
neither of those is the equivalent clarion call "threat to democracy".
By themselves, no, I would agree with you.
What actually screams "threat to democracy" is inciting your followers to ransack the Capitol when you lose an election. That's pretty democracy-threatening.
even accounting for the heated rhetoric "peacefully and patriotically march to the Capitol" leaves you with an uphill climb. mho
It wasn't just that one speech. It was the months-long campaign, that started even before the election, to discredit the results, spread lies about the integrity of the vote, and concoct an illegal and unconstitutional scheme to overturn the result using not just fake electors, but demanding that Mike Pence choose the winner via his role on Jan. 6. The ENTIRE THING screams "threat to democracy". He is going to do the same thing again if he loses.
I mean you wrestle with facts here so idk what to say. If the right was domestically violent I think empirical evidence would have shown an increase the last four years v. the previous four
Dude, he refuses to accept election results unless he likes them. He still claims the last election was stolen, and he's sowing seeds of doubt right now in preparation to claim the same thing if he loses again.
If encouraging tens of millions of people to not trust elections isn't a threat to democracy, what is?
Lol. God damn man. What a fucking loyal leftist you’ve become.
Elections never have fraud. Trust the state. Arrest anyone who says differently.
What a fucking statist joke you’ve become due to your hatred of one man.
Isn't this where I would say "democrats complained about elections first" to show you being fallacious. Or does that only work when you're excusing democrats for their actions?
You really need to get back on your meds, buddy.
Can you provide an explanation for how you are consistently able to respond to commenters who you keep on mute? My browser doesn't let me do this.
It’s helps if you are a liar.
>>he’s sowing seeds of doubt right now
could be interpreted as in response to media & government predicting election mayhem months in advance.
I think you’ve got that backwards. If there is mayhem, it will be because Trump’s believers don’t trust democratic elections anymore as a result of his telling them not to. Democracy doesn’t work if people don’t accept the election results. And if election results can’t be trusted, what replaces them? Force. So when Trump tells his people not to trust elections (and replace them with force because that's really the only alternative), he's directly threatening democracy.
>>I think you’ve got that backwards.
this is why there are four sides to the voting coin.
You don't think that if Trump wins the left will freak the fuck out and riot? It's going to be a mess whatever the outcome, I think.
If they do they'll be freaking out not because they want the election overturned, but because they hate the winner.
If Trump has a lasting legacy, it will be distrust in the electoral system. I do not believe that is a good thing.
Not all that worried about either side. Some people are going to act out, but so what.
We can and have dealt with riots, either by cracking down, or letting them burn out, or something in between. Ultimately January 6th was nothing but a riot, and not even a particularly violent one. We were never even 1% along the path to a coup, there never was any path from them trashing the capitol building to somehow the election is overturned or the country falls into ruin. In the real world lights stayed on, stores were open, people went to work. I wonder if the riot even broke 50% share of those watching a screen that day.
Same thing with BLM. The vast majority of people neither participated nor were affected. I know my neighbors and we're not going to burn down each others' houses in a few weeks.
"We can and have dealt with riots,"
The riots were spontaneous outbursts and were not particularly a threat. A program of assassinations of politicians, judges, activists, civil servants, journalists and so on is the more damaging strategy. It already seems to be working.
Sometimes you watch a football game or basketball game and your favorite team plays almost--but not quite--well enough to win. Everyone played hard, the official called a balanced game, can't complain. You mostly just accept the loss and move on.
But sometimes, due to a number of really questionable calls, it really feels like the officials have $10k bet on the other team and really need to win those bets. Add in the TV announcers who have no end of praise for the other team. It's human nature to feel like you've been screwed over and complain a lot about how.
The sporting officials and play by play announcers are rarely targeted for assassination.
> ... If there is mayhem, it will be because Trump’s believers don’t trust democratic elections...
Bullshit. At this point it's about 50/50. if Kamala wins, you are correct. But if Trump wins, there's about an equal chance that there will be mayhem b/c the Kamala kamp doesn't trust democratic elections b/c the Democrat didn't win. After all, it's right there in the words; it is only "democratic" if the "democrat" wins. They will never accept that their views are not representative of the majority.
I like how sarc ignores Hillary and his favorite corporate journalists STILL call the 2016 election illegitimate, think Gore won, think Ohio cheated.
It is utterly amazing.
The whole fortification bit was predicated on the revealed knowledge that Trump was busy behind the scenes cheating to win 2020 election just like had to have cheated to win 2016 election. Sec. Clinton was regularly predicting Trump's win and asserting it will have been due to his massive cheating.
E.g., WaPo: Sep 26, 2019 Hillary Clinton dismissed President Trump as an "illegitimate president" and suggested that "he knows" that he stole the 2016 presidential election
E.g. National Review, Oct 2020
“There was a widespread understanding that this election [in 2016] was not on the level,” Clinton said during an interview for the latest episode of The Atlantic’s politics podcast, The Ticket. “We still don’t know what really happened.”
The 2016 Democratic presidential nominee predicted that among several scenarios, Republicans are going to try to “mess up absentee balloting” so that they could get a potentially narrow advantage in the Electoral College.
“We've got to have a massive legal operation, I know the Biden campaign is working on that,” she said. “We have to have poll workers, and I urge people, who are able, to be a poll worker. We have to have our own teams of people to counter the force of intimidation that the Republicans and Trump are going to put outside polling places. This is a big organizational challenge, but at least we know more about what they're going to do.”
Clinton said she thinks that the only way Trump could win re-election is “by either suppressing or stopping voting, or outright intimidating people into feeling that they have to go with the strong guy to stand up against all these threats that Trump is going to gin up to scare people.”
All I can says is 'Project much, Hillary?'
They might be basing their conclusion on the fact that all of the recent political assassination attempts have come from the left.
Republican baseball practice
Justice Kavanaugh
President Trump
All the conservatives hit by cars.
The shooting of a conservative in Seattle.
The left-wing violence tends to be more planned, and directed at specific targets, that is true.
The right-wing violence, on the other hands, tends to be more disorganized and stochastic.
So you have a left-winger making a political statement trying to assassinate Trump. But then you have a right-winger making a political statement murdering a bunch of people at a Walmart in El Paso. They are both acts of political violence, just carried out in different ways.
Do you actually know the definition of stochastic? I am not certain you do.
It is a word that democrats made up to silence their enemies. Words are violence. All the other critical theory bullshit Jeff believes in.
JesseAZ, sometimes I think Liz Wolfe should pay me. I am just asking some questions (yuck, yuck) of chemjeff. He is not doing too good. I think he is flubbing on 'random' and it's implications.
Do you think chemjeff has a STEM degree?
No. He sucks at math and statistics. Usually they at least take some intro courses to both.
lol this is gaslighting and poisoning the well on your part.
I have more math knowledge in my pinky finger than you have in your sorry excuse for a brain.
You are just trolling to pre-emptively get people to disbelieve my arguments because you cannot refute them on their merits. The only way you can 'win' is if you construct a reality in which everyone believes I am bad at math. That way they won't even bother to inspect my argument, they just dismiss it. That is your strategy here. And it is because you are WRONG on your math and your statistics. You are particularly wrong with your immigration statistics. This has been shown to you over and over again and you cannot rebut or even address the argument, so your new strategy is to gaslight everyone else into thinking your critics are all 'bad at math'. Fuck you and fuck your gaslighting nonsense.
C’mon, big math guy. How many rapes and murders and other peoples money is too much?
Just give us a number, Jeff.
Hey now!
Sometimes a guy will just jerk off onto the gang-rape victim and not, you know, actually rape her.
So factor that into your calculations.
Sure. Stochastic = random. Cannot be predicted in advance.
So it is relatively easy to predict that political candidates are likely targets of political violence, and to take steps to stop that. It is difficult, if not impossible, to predict that random shoppers at a WalMart in El Paso will be targets of political violence.
Sure. Stochastic = random. Cannot be predicted in advance.
Bzzt.
Stochastic events have a predictable mean average between them.
They absolutely can be predicted in advance.
Not knowing what words mean shouldn't stop someone from using them. Sarcjeff argue in good faith, which is what matters.
Thank you for verifying that you do not know how statistics and probabilities work.
The average of an infinite number of coin flips of an unbiased coin, will be 50% heads and 50% tails. That can be predicted.
What cannot be predicted is whether any particular coin flip will wind up heads or tails. That is random.
Similarly, one can make a statistical prediction about the number of episodes of politically motivated violence there will be, based on past trends. But one cannot predict whether any particular location will be the target of a particular act of political violence at any particular time. That is 'stochastic' in nature.
The word you were looking for was sporadic.
Stochastic still have averages. And in order to classify activity x as stochastic, you need that average.
You failed basic stats.
All bounded random variables have an average.
And here I am thinking you’re all (all of you) are wrapped around the axel on the mathematical use of ‘stochastic’.
An alternative definition of the word is focused on “Of, relating to, or characterized by conjecture; conjectural.” or “Conjectural; able to conjecture”.
This is the sense of the word when used to describe ‘stochastic terrorism’, because the speaker’s ‘coded language’ is supposedly meant to lead the followers to take actions that the speaker never actually said, but the followers understood the words to really mean (they drew conjectures). “Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?”
wikipedia
As of 2016, “stochastic terrorism” was an “obscure” academic term according to professor David S. Cohen.[24] During an August 9, 2016 campaign rally, then-candidate Donald Trump remarked “If [Hillary Clinton] gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is. I don’t know.” These comments were widely condemned as instigating violence, and described by Cohen as “stochastic terrorism”, further popularizing the term.[25][24][13] Trump has continued to be criticized as inspiring violence.[26][27][28][29]
Although same wikipedia also explains the term based on more mathematical interpretation:
Credit for defining the term has also been given to the blogger, G2geek, on the Daily Kos platform in 2011, when defining it as “the use of mass communications to stir up random lone wolves to carry out violent or terrorist acts that are statistically predictable but individually unpredictable”, with plausible deniability for those creating media messaging.[1][22][23] The article covered the 2011 Tucson shooting.[13]
There is a statistically significant difference between whether a coin flip ends up heads or tails, based on the starting position of the coin.
Too stupid to realize it is always team blue enforcing their beliefs through violence are you?
Military Hezbollah does not use pagers or walkie talkies or anything wireless for communication. They’ve been using fiber optics or couriers for years. Civil Hezbollah (the people who do the govtl/bureaucratic stuff they do as a political party/machine in Lebanon) is who was using the wireless stuff. It's why when the pagers exploded, the injuries were all in Beirut not south of the Litani
I know you people are all just useful idiots but it always amazes how persistently stupid. It’s the same story with Hamas – or for that matter the Baathists in Iraq. Military Hamas did Oct 7. Civil Hamas are the doctors, paramedics, cops, etc who are the civil administration of Gaza.
JFree, just read above. They're all savages so who gives a shit. Send them all to Allah. that's the prevailing attitude here
Pro jew killing, and hamas/hezbollah apologia are the prevailing sentiments among the
left-leaning commenters hereSORRY!!!! I mean the "Libertarian" commenters here.JFree, there is no 'civil' hezball-less or hamas; they are Judeocidal terrorists. Their covenants explicitly call for the death of Jews. Yesterday, the radwan leadership was sent on the one-way Paradise Train to a warm destination. Would you weep for terrorists, JFree?
Amazing how so many men, aged 16-60 within a confined 250 mi2 area, all suddenly had their beepers blow the fuck up. And roughly a thousand were made eunuchs, LMAO. That was artistry.
The kinetic war has begun, and Hezball-less is losing, badly. hezbollah will move north of the Litani river, or die in place.
Would you weep for terrorists, JFree?
He's demonstrated that his answer is yes.
If you don't know your enemy ...
Not a surprise that you believe that, in a country where women don't work and where the religion has the same opinion of women that many of you R's have, all men of working age are automatically soldiers and therefore targets. There are no civilians and certainly no innocents.
It is why Netanyahu could refer to Hamas as Amalek [1 Samuel 15:3 - Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.] and morons like you think that is a valid military strategy rather than a call to genocide.
It is why Israel is losing in Gaza - and is now trying to replicate that and escalate in the West Bank and Lebanon.
It is why Israel is losing in Gaza....
Uh huh. ROTFLMAO. You ok? I want what you're smoking.
After eleven months of war - the military side of Hamas is still controlling Gaza, still has hostages, and is still making things very dangerous for IDF there. Considering the sheer size and capability of both forces - with unlimited supplies of weaponry to one from the US - the total loss of all diplomatic status of Israel in the world - the move of institutional investors and citizens out of Israel and the loss of their economy - yes Israel is losing. Worse - if their rage attack ends up turning into being called genocide instead.
JFree....let's review.
hamas does not control gaza; Israel does.
The IDF have killed off roughly half of hamas in gaza.
hamas has tortured, then killed most of the remaining hostages.
Israel can raise money in the intl capital markets; hamas cannot.
Whatever you're smoking, I'd like some. Do you have rose tinted glasses, too?
The smoke is coming out of JFucked's ass.
Civil Hamas?
No True Hamas-ian fallacy?
The obvious example are the mass graves at the hospitals that Israel has raided (and more than that – targeted – because tunnels are a very tough target) in Gaza. Those are the doctors, orderlies, technicians, etc.
eg The three clerks and one supervisor who comprised the unit that counts and verifies identities of the dead. That is part of what is called, correctly, Hamas run Ministry of Health that very very accurately compiled info from morgues around Gaza and counted/verified the directly-killed dead until Nov or so with the first or second attack on Shifa. They've been doing that for years - and possible before Hamas took over Gaza. The supervisor was summarily executed – and the three clerks haven’t been seen since.
Maybe you can call them simply Hamas. I don’t really care what useful idiots do. But it is a FACT that killing them doesn’t diminish any unit that conducted Oct 7 or that would be planning a future attack on Israel. Not at all.
"...(and more than that – targeted – because tunnels are a very tough target)..."
As a propagandist, you should avoid making it so obvious that:
You.
Are.
Full.
Of,
Shit.
FOAD, asshole.
It's not so different from the spit between the military Irish Republican Army (IRA) and the political party Sinn Fein. They maintained an arms length distance between themselves, but shared the same goals. In this case it was the struggle to free Ireland of British rule. It's notable that Ireland today is Europe's most enthusiastic supporters of the Palestinian cause. Maybe it's Turkey, but you get the idea.
Hezbollah and Hamas both actively call for the extermination of jews.
If you join them, even as a bureaucrat , you deserve an exploding pager to the face.
It sounds like you oppose extermination now. What changed?
You are the antisemite bullshit spewing Reason commenter.
>>U.S. federal research funding helped to advance Chinese technologies with military applications ... to fuel a potential national security rival to the United States
industrial complexes are complex.
>>But is anyone else a little alarmed by the relative quiet following a second attempt on Donald Trump's life?
who, the people who want it to happen or the people who aren't surprised it's gone this far?
So, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Traitor) doesn't want a federal abortion ban, but he wants a federal abortion ban when fetuses can "feel pain". Sounds legit.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/josh-hawley-national-abortion-ban-federal-restrictions-1235108785/
taking up the side of lol when do babies feel pain seems like a bad idea
>> If you did not travel with a stroller, you may borrow one there, free of charge
how’s the small-business attitude there? thinking of renting small children to help people skirt the lines
Huge profits! Kids work cheap.
>>"Sometimes, the best thing a parent can do is nothing at all,"
the 70s were awesome.
I was a Latch-Key kid...would not trade that for anything.
The rule was, when the streetlight comes on, come home.
We managed to survive.
in New Jersey in the early 80s we played flashlight tag after dark … in the woods … fifty-ish neighborhood kids running around in the woods after dark was situation normal
Yep....and you survived. Incredible. Kids running around with flashlights, screaming with delight, in the early evening. Deprived childhood you had, lol.
We didn't know how good we had it.
when they marathon them I watch the hour-long SuperBowl highlight reels from NFL Films to remember.
I think this bears repeating.
“We love our country. I love our country. I know we all do. That’s why everybody’s here right now. We love our country. We take pride in the privilege of being American. And this is a moment where we can and must come together as Americans understanding we have so much more in common than what separates us. Let’s come together with the character that we are so proud about who we are, which is we are an optimistic people. We are an optimistic people. Americans, by character, are people who have dreams and ambitions and aspirations. We believe in what is possible. We believe in what can be. And we believe in fighting for that. That’s how we came into being because the people before us understood that one of the greatest expressions for the love of our country, one of the greatest expressions of patriotism, is to fight for the ideals of who we are, which includes freedom to make decisions about your own body, freedom to be safe from gun violence, freedom to have access to the ballot box, freedom to be who you are… freedom to just be. And that’s who we are. We believe in all that.”
Hugs & Kisses,
Kamala
Kamala is unburdened by logic, or reason. 😉
she's burdened by lots ... it shows in her panicked eyes
Her numbers are eroding, steadily. The more she talks, the more it hurts. The ultimate in political kobiashi maru tests; Kamala must be silent to win. LMAO.
Unburdened by any attractive quality.
We take pride in the privilege of being American.
Some of you have more pride than others, and we will all be obligated to celebrate that. Some of you have more privilege than others, and you will be demonized to no end for that. #freedom
Abortions for some, tiny American flags for others, joy for all!
freedom to be safe from gun violence, freedom to have access to the ballot box
She may as well have just said that the Founding Fathers dreamed of one day going to The Moon.
also doesn't understand both of those positions are mine and her political existence is the roadblock to both.
And this is a moment where we can and must come together as Americans understanding we have so much more in common than what separates us.
This line is the biggest bunch of bullshit any politician ever spewed. By no objective measure do Americans have much of anything in common these days. And most of that is due precisely to the left’s ongoing subversion project since the 1960s.
Anyone running this line is just pushing a neo-Maoist unity-criticism-unity narrative.
… freedom to just be.
This appeal to hedonism is notably what marxist deviants like Foucault have promoted ("the beings that are not allowed to be") in the interest of advancing the communist utopia.
Oh good, RRWP’s inner authoritarian is making an appearance.
The “freedom to just be” is an appeal to Marxist hedonism and must be stamped out. We must all be forced to conform to the RRWP ideal of purity. Got it.
Yes, chemtard, we all know you want the “freedom to be” a pedophile without shame or repurcussions. Especially when it’s coming from an actual red diaper baby, and originated by a marxist academic who also happened to like em young.
No, this is how you and your authoritarian shithead pals define "freedom to be" - only in the most libertine and perverse manner possible. It's your ilk who wants to ban porn and throw gays back into the closet.
No, this is how you and your authoritarian shithead pals define “freedom to be” – only in the most libertine and perverse manner possible.
That's exactly what the left means when it argues for "freedom to be"--whether it's Marcuse, Foucault, Gayle Rubin, Judith Butler, or any of the other freaks in the cultural marxist religion. Don't get pissed just because I'm holding them to their own stnadards.
My favorite part was, when pressed about gun control, she suddenly and completely without solicitation, turned into Joe "Shoot first, ask questions later." Biden on the topic.
one of the greatest expressions of patriotism, is to fight for the ideals of who we are, which includes freedom to make decisions about your own body, freedom to be safe from gun violence, freedom to have access to the ballot box, freedom to be who you are… freedom to just be. And that’s who we are. We believe in all that.”
Sure, let's see who blinks first when I show you what my version of "just being" and "being who I am" hits your eyeballs.
With the exception of "freedom from gun violence" (which doesn't actually exist), it sounds great. I don't think she really believes all of that, but it sounds like a great vision to strive for.
Now, there is a candidate running who does more closely believe in the "freedom to just be", but we can't talk about him around here because he also waves a Pride flag.
Lol. How many virtues can you signal? Is there a limit?
It could simply be that I've been offline, vacationing, for too long and that I've missed much of the analysis. But is anyone else a little alarmed by the relative quiet following a second attempt on Donald Trump's life?
Fair warning: Thinking like that runs the risk of developing a long-term memory... and a drinking problem.
Drinking improves long term memory?
If someone was buried in a large stone coffin that was made in the shape of a forty bottle, would that be referred to as a sarcophagus?
That’s just burynary thinking.
Not something to be taken for granite.
Dude, you rock!
one large Stone IPA.
Thank you, whoever is claiming to be C-in-C these days (or are these decisions now made by some DEI-hire Lt. Col. now?):
“US to send more troops to Middle East after Israeli targets Hezbollah in major Lebanon”
[…]
““In light of increased tensions in the Middle East and out of an abundance of caution, we are sending a small number of additional U.S. military personnel forward to augment forces already in the region,” said Air Force Maj. Pat Ryder, the Pentagon press secretary. “For operations security reasons, we won’t comment on or provide specific details.”…”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/us-to-send-more-troops-to-middle-east-after-israeli-targets-hezbollah-in-major-lebanon/ar-AA1r3MER
>>>“For operations security reasons, we won’t comment on or provide specific details.”…”
to help ... not Israel.
Donald Trump has gained a bit more of a lead in Arizona while maintaining his lead in Georgia, both states won by Joe Biden in 2020.
Man, those people in Arizona and Georgia just can't make up their minds about Trump, eh?
Arizona is particularly interesting because Harris appears to have a Latino voter problem. The same poll, back in August, "found Ms. Harris leading by five percentage points." It's Latinos who've seemingly moved away from Harris, "though a significant number—10 percent—said they were now undecided," reports the Times. Interestingly, the Democratic candidate for Senate, Ruben Gallego, is polling well there despite Trump's lead, suggesting a fair number of voters may split their tickets this time around.
Most interesting part of this analysis: How far the media has run away from LatinX.
In fact, people are kind of cutely offended if you don't take them up on this; it's culturally important to let families go first. After traveling through Portugal and Cabo Verde (formerly a Portuguese colony), I am grateful for the small ways this culture attempts to make everyday tasks easier for families with young kids.
So a kind of Stay Out zone for childless cat ladies.
It could simply be that I've been offline, vacationing, for too long and that I've missed much of the analysis. But is anyone else a little alarmed by the relative quiet following a second attempt on Donald Trump's life?
Uh, Liz, we're still shaking our heads and marveling at how deep they buried the first attempt on his life. We'll get to the second one when we pick our jaws up off the floor.
Did you know that federal law prohibits selling raw milk across state lines? I did not, until reading this. More on the laws by state here.
Yes, but I have all those alt-right podcasts in my timeline.
"Sometimes, the best thing a parent can do is nothing at all," writes Russell Shaw in The Atlantic, making the case for how parents can and should step back to improve kids' outcomes (and their own).
And apparently, the Russell Shaw at the Atlantic has been listening to them, too.
Camille Paglia explains the fundamental contradiction of modern liberalism
Like I said, you just summed up my alt-right youtube feed. Welcome to the party, Liz.
lolz
Reason - you are pretty quiet when Biden and Harris do tariffs
"The Biden administration on Monday proposed banning the import or sale of connected vehicles containing Chinese or Russian components, sounding an alarm about the potential for modern transport to be used as a tool for spying or to create domestic chaos during a conflict..."
100% tariff!
Nah, Reason's been pretty consistent on Tariffs. When Trump does Tariffs, they complain. When Harris and Biden do Tariffs, they complain that they're acting like Trump. When Reagan did Tariffs they... I'm not sure what they say about Reagan tariffs.
Easy, they were very Trumpian.
More Trumpian than a Black Nazi?
The Reagan tariffs were completely Trump's fault, and if you can't see that, you aren't the One True Libertarian that I thought you were. . . .
I love the framing on this, Fraulein Wolfe.
Early this morning, the Israeli military struck over 300 sites across Lebanon, aiming at militants with the terrorist group Hezbollah.
...
Yesterday, Hezbollah launched 150 rockets, drones, and missiles into northern Israel
Seems like those should have been rEpOrTeD the other way around. Oh, but then you wouldn't have been able to lament "Lebanon's deadliest day." (Which, please stop referring to them by their Iranian proxy names. Like "Palestine," there's not really a real Lebanon. It's just Hezbollah, trying to pretend they're not a terrorist-nation by cowering behind civilian populations.
A day they - like Hamas - absolutely had coming, Iran has coming, and for which we should all be really amazed and proud of how much restraint Israel is showing in all this and how well they're orchestrating this to minimize civilian casualties.