States Are Banning This DIY Rape Kit
This company made a product to serve victims who don't want to go to police right after a sexual assault. Some politicians want to ban it.

Forensic evidence can be an important tool in solving and prosecuting sexual assault cases, but some victims don't feel comfortable coming forward to police or medical examiners right away. Enter Leda Health, a company selling at-home evidence collection kits. "Collect time-sensitive DNA after sexual assault," the company advertises.
Typically, rape kits—as they are unfortunately called—are administered by medical professionals. With Leda's "early evidence kits," people collect potential DNA themselves and send it off to be processed by the company's partner labs.
But some states think Leda is overselling what its product can do for a victim.
"These kits essentially offer false promises to consumers by misleading them to think evidence collected privately at home can result in a criminal conviction—that is yet to have happened anywhere with the use of these kits," said Pennsylvania Attorney General Michelle Henry when she sued Leda in civil court in June. At least two states—Maryland and Washington—have outright banned the evidence kits. New York and Pennsylvania have sent cease-and-desist letters to Leda.
In a suit of its own against Pennsylvania and New York, Leda counters that "these kits are important because data shows that factors like lack of access, privacy concerns, personal safety, and distrust cause many sexual assault victims to avoid law enforcement and traditional methods of reporting and seeking help." The company "has never claimed that its resources are better or more effective than those offered by the government," but it adds "survivors may require more (and different) resources than what governments currently offer them."
States haven't exactly done a stellar job at managing sexual assault forensic evidence. In some states, police have been caught throwing out untested rape kits even before statutes of limitation expire. Many states have backlogs of untested rape kits—some numbering in the thousands, according to the group End the Backlog. At last measure, Pennsylvania had 177 kits in its backlog and Maryland—one of the worst offenders—had 5,468 untested rape kits.
In April, Maryland's Democratic Gov. Wes Moore signed into law a measure banning the sale of self-administered sexual assault evidence collection kits, deeming such sales "an unfair, deceptive, or abusive trade practice." The law also bans self-collected evidence from being admissible in criminal or civil court proceedings, unless collected using a kit issued by the Maryland Department of Health.
In 2023, Washington state passed H.B. 1564, which bans selling "a sexual assault kit that is marketed or otherwise presented as over-the-counter, at-home, or self-collected or in any manner that indicates that the sexual assault kit may be used for the collection of evidence of sexual assault other than by law enforcement or a health care provider."
"Leda Health believes sexual assault survivors need resources beyond what the government offers," the company said in a lawsuit filed in response against Washington state. Leda "does everything it can to supply admissible results," including offering a full chain-of-custody report. The ban violates the First Amendment, the company argues, by restricting "what it can and cannot say about sexual assault evidence collection."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"'These kits essentially offer false promises to consumers by misleading them to think evidence collected privately at home can result in a criminal conviction—that is yet to have happened anywhere with the use of these kits,' said Pennsylvania Attorney General Michelle Henry"
And there is your explanation.
"In a suit of its own against Pennsylvania and New York, Leda counters that "these kits are important because data shows that factors like lack of access, privacy concerns, personal safety, and distrust cause many sexual assault victims to avoid law enforcement and traditional methods of reporting and seeking help."
But if such evidence is unikely to be admissable, then it is a waste of money, and only encouraging victims from going through proper evidence collection. It is self-sabotaging their own case from the start.
" Leda "does everything it can to supply admissible results," including offering a full chain-of-custody report. "
My question is - how can they do that? How can they know that the evidence was gathered properly, at home by an untrained amateur? That it was handled properly, stored properly, and not contaminated, prior to arrival (by mail?) in their possession?
Which are very good questions.
Right. Chain of custody begins at the point of collection. The company cannot offer "full" chain of custody. The evidence is legally worthless.
I remember reading that they have someone (I think nurses?) on video chat basically during the collection to observe. But still highly doubt that does much for admissibility.
only encouraging victims from going through proper evidence collection
'Discouraging' but, yeah, you can't legally manufacture your own evidence at home against someone else as a product.
...unless you're Alvin Bragg.
What evidence, and against whom, do you imagine Bragg manufactured? Evidence in support of E Jean Carroll's accusation that Trump sexually assaulted her in a department room dressing room, that 12 jurors found credible, or Stormy Daniels account of a sexual tryst with Trump in a Vegas hotel, which Trump incredibly denied but another 12 jurors believed?
Nobody found the evidence credible, you fucking liar. That’s why they charged him with defamation instead of rape.
Because all they had to prove is that Trump defamed her by saying she was crazy. They didn’t have to prove her rape accusation, because they couldn’t.
She claimed she had a dress she was wearing when she was raped, which turned out to be manufactured several years later and not at the time she claimed to be assaulted. So Trump offered a DNA sample and requested that the dress be tested.
Here’s what your wicked, corrupt, bought-and-purchased judge did:
“On February 15 Judge Kaplan dismissed Trump’s offer as an out-of-line delay tactic.[75] Further, the judge argued that the presence of Trump’s DNA would not conclusively prove whether a rape occurred… In late March, the judge prohibited any mention of DNA evidence at the trial.[5][c]
The judge also banned mention that the dress she provided as proof of her rape wasn’t even manufactured yet.
But it got fucking worse:
“on March 23 Kaplan ruled that the jury would be anonymous for the trial. He cited Trump’s incendiary rhetoric against perceived enemies (including officials) ahead of his criminal indictment in New York related to hush money payments to Stormy Daniels.[90][82][91] On April 10 Kaplan ruled that the jury would be anonymous even to the lawyers involved in the case, citing threats by Trump supporters against Judge Juan Merchan, who was overseeing the New York criminal investigation of The Trump Organization.[91] On April 14 Kaplan upheld his ruling for an anonymous jury and denied a request from Trump’s team for information about its members on the basis of possible bias after they cited negative online comments made about him on Carroll’s June 2019 New York article.
That is probably the single most corrupt thing done at a defamation trial in American history. The accused’s lawyers couldn’t participate in selection and as far as they could know, Kaplan’s secret jury may consist of the twelve top Democrat congressmen in DC.
And this is the horseshit you’re pretending was even remotely on the level.
Fuck you, Nazi and fuck your fascist kangaroo courts.
Could you imagine calling the victim to the stand as the collection tech? The conflict there could sink the case, even if true.
Then all victim testimony is crooked. This means nobody who has any stake in the outcome of a case should be allowed to testify in it. Only the indifferent should be allowed to be involved.
Come to think of it, the same pertains to other functions of government. The governed should not be allowed to elect officials to govern them. Only foreigners should be allowed to rule.
I wonder if there's any group, organization, media outlet that's ever called witness testimony into question?
Questioning a possible victim on the handling of evidence in such sensitive cases is far more of a problem than going to the hospital for the proper procedure in the first place.
Everything done in treating the victim’s body as a crime scene is to get her her best shot at restitution. Cross examination on chain of custody and contamination by the defense lawyer is a TOTALLY different level of inconsiderate, invasive violation.
Grilling someone as the victim requires some level of sensitivity, grilling the cop who fucked up the CoD or has a conflict, not so much. This puts the victim in the cop's shoes and helps call the evidence into question because the person doing the collection has an interest in the outcome.
John browning and Sam colt made rape prevention kits, not post rape evidence kits. States are trying to ban that too
This took me a moment and I thought “good idea, but not as good as a…”
Then it hit me.
""and distrust cause many sexual assault victims to avoid law enforcement "'
If you plan to proceed with a case against your rapist, you cannot avoid law enforcement. Like it or not.
If you are a student at a college or university, YES you can exclude law enforcement. It's called Title IX.
I'm not saying that it's right, I'm just saying that it can be done.
Believe All Women. They never lie about sexual assault to, say, win a custody battle or just get back at someone they have broken up with. Use this kit, add a piece of hair or skin sample, send it in. Viola! Proof of sexual assault. That is the real danger, here. Much like mail in voting, mail in assault kits will become rife with fraud.
DIY rape is a crime now?
Not you typical solo activity.
( Maybe I should have read the article)
"( Maybe I should have read the article)"
Nah. This is Reason. The headline and the author's name is all you need to read.
^ This
OT Post:
For many years now, I had heard that Metformin prolongs life (an "off label" use). Also prevents brain rot! Good luck spending $3 trillion to get the FDA to allow you to add that to the label, or tell doctors about it!
If ye are a REAL freedom-loving libertarian, and fear "brain rot" setting in, and turning ye into a freedom-fearing sore-in-the-cunt cuntsorevaturd, then get ye ONTO the Metformin!
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02938-w#:~:text=The%20study%20was%20not%20intended,%E2%80%9D%20in%20monkeys%2C%20Liu%20says. The brain aged more slowly in monkeys given a cheap diabetes drug
Daily dose of the common medication metformin preserved cognition and delayed decline of some tissues.
You're disgusting.
Freedom is disgusting? Or opposing brain rot is disgusting? Or both? The two are ASSociated, ya know!
(Advanced intelligences of ALL kinds, throughout the universe, favor individual freedom, NOT slavery!)
No credible evidence of any protection against "brain rot" afforded by metformin. In any event, clearly too late for you.
The credible evidence is right above here (twat I am responding to), and shit shows that moronodoc doesn't believe in science or data.
This is irony.
Yes, there is MUCH irony in the fact that DRUGS (a boogey-man of many-many author-shitarians everywhere, for supposedly causing "brian rot") could actually SAVE many of us, from said "brain rot"!
More testing needed.
These tests can't test if the rapists are sorry - jeff
Rapes by immigrants are just cultural misunderstandings. Let's be more tolerant and welcoming.
No they are banning the claim that this is a DIY rape kit. Which it isn't since it isn't admissible in court.
Besides chain of evidence which is an issue despite this company's claims, since the collection is the issue, it also doesn't provide the victim with the medical exam that is important to a criminal case. Having documented signs of bruises and tearing goes along way to refute consensual claims.
Probably best for this company to just call it what it is a DNA collection kit.
Spermy Daniels (and SOME other women) NEED this kind of kit, so ass to track which is the father of which of their many children!
Meanwhile, our pubic education system can NOT bring itself to teach young children (especially girls) that having 5 children by 4 different fathers is NOT often a route to family peace and prosperity!
Look up "Bristol Palin"! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Palin
*wonders what a Stormy Daniels-submitted DIY rape kit would show*
Lizard People DNA?
Probably best for this company to just call it what it is, a
DNA collection kitprop in a narrative/play.An off-the-shelf test tube or centrifuge tube can collect DNA. A buccal swab can collect DNA. A blue dress can collect DNA.
This is a prop for LARPers. Even below the level of "Bluechew” and “For Hims”-style “at home self-care”.
Oh, Jesus Fuck:
"Who you'll be talking to"
Madison Campbell and Jacob Madden
WTF is this shit? They're literally catering to the victim narrative.
“Who you’ll be talking to”
I'm pretty sure that jacket without-a-shirt number he's wearing is a sexual assault.
Back in the day all you needed was a blue dress.
"These kits essentially offer false promises to consumers by misleading them to think evidence collected privately at home can result in a criminal conviction—that is yet to have happened anywhere with the use of these kits," said Pennsylvania Attorney General Michelle Henry when she sued Leda in civil court in June.
While I'm not sure why any state needs to ban the sale of this kit, the above quote is literally 942% correct... hand over all the 3d printed, diy, NOSTR-powered, $100 laptop-inspired, Mastodon-looking rape kits to the cops all you want while you screech "Kevin Spacey Raped Me!". There is no sane court in the land that would accept them as evidence, and they shouldn't.
DIY entrapment kit.
DIY blackmail kit.
"Leda Health believes sexual assault survivors need resources beyond what the government offers," the company said in a lawsuit filed in response against Washington state. Leda "does everything it can to supply admissible results," including offering a full chain-of-custody report.
This statement is so alarmingly stupid, I'm now not surprised that the Reason Sex-and-Tech, keep-your-eyeballs-off-women-hey-subscribe-to-my-onlyfans! reporter would write story going to bat for this company.
Let's break it down one piece at a time: "Leda Health believes sexual assault survivors need resources beyond what the government offers,"
A solution "beyond what government offers" that produces a solution that allows the government to offer a long prison sentence to the accused? Tell you what... let's allow DIY evidence collection if we agree to disagree and allow DIY prison sentences.
"Get the government out of the evidence collection business but keep them in the rape-arrest, trial, conviction and imprisonment business" is quite possibly the most Beltway Libertarian thing I've read all week.
"does everything it can to supply admissible results,"
There is literally no situation where I could imagine home-collected DNA tests would be admissible.
including offering a full chain-of-custody report.
It's not the chain of custody that makes this kit next to useless in a court of law...
This statement is so alarmingly stupid, I’m now not surprised that the Reason Sex-and-Tech, keep-your-eyeballs-off-women-hey-subscribe-to-my-onlyfans! reporter would write story going to bat for this company.
Did you see the photo linked in my post above? You know the whole meme about how male feminists are frequently the rapiest of rape-y beta male creeps? Yeah.
Leda Health. Protecting Rapey Lefties from conviction for over 5 years! Convince the love of your life to buy one today!
I'm not a fan of laws substituting government fiat for consumer judgement but I'm not seeing as much problem here.
As described here, I think there's a strong argument that this company is engaging in pretty flagrant false advertising. Yes, you are collecting "evidence" but it's evidence that can't ever be used in any court or other legal proceeding.
*me waiting for someone to compare a diy rape kit to homeowner-submitted ring-doorbell-cam footage*
Not even close to a valid comparison.
1. Video footage is (or at least, often can be) self-authenticating. The chain of custody for a video is not nearly as challenging as the chain of custody for a medical lab test.
2. The video evidence itself is not held by or collected from the plaintiff/victim/witness. Your ring-doorbell footage is held by Amazon on their servers.
There's also, of course, the classic circumstantial vs. direct issue.
A video showing someone taking something off your porch is direct evidence of the thing being taken off your porch.
A tube of DNA is circumstantial to the consent/rape.
We don't know if Bill Clinton exerted any undue influence to get Monica Lewinsky to service him or not. We know for a fact that he lied about it.
Progressive MSM blaming Trump’s “rhetoric” for Kamala adjacent folks shooting at Trump is like blaming the rape victim for her outfit.
So a woman can take my DNA somehow, then stuff it in a vile and say she was raped?
These people cannot be serious.
To be fair, she can do that now, but what she gets with Leda Health is a rock-solid chain of custody system.
From your tool, to her box, into the kit. 100% certified.
You have an interesting definition of "rock-solid". I would say it's about as solid as smoke. And so far as I know, no court anywhere has yet said otherwise.
ENB has an interesting definition of "good idea".
The company is basically preying on sexual assault victims who are understandably vulnerable and traumatized by deceiving them into thinking that any of this "evidence" would ever be admissible in a court of law. Courts aren't going to accept it and by the time the victim realizes it, it's too late to collect evidence through the proper chain of custody that could actually be used in a prosecution.
Officer 1: *arrives on scene to smoking ruins of car accident in intersection* So... what do we got here?
Crash investigator: *looks up from clipboard* Head on collision. Two SUVs, green light, but both of them drifted into oncoming traffic at the same time. Helluva coincidence, but it is what it is.
Officer 1: Victims?
Crash Investigator: Two.
Officer 1: Identified?
Crash Investigator: Yeah, some eyewitnesses happened to know both drivers. *looks on next page* Names are... #MeToo Movement and... Capitalism.
Officer 1: So, survivors?
Crash Investigator: Yeah... *flips to third page, squints* Name of Leda Health... she's in an ambulance on the way to the hospital... probably won't make it.
JFC, you literally can't make this up:
It’s like Paris’s First Aid kits from Gilmore girls. Teens will buy anything if you just package it right.
It is actually that level of thinking.
It’s like Paris’s First Aid kits from Gilmore girls.
[Shudders at Jacob Madden vibe]
I really hope ENB doesn’t actually think these kits are a good idea???
Because she’d be moron level IQ or lower for thinking so.
It definitely sucks for rape victims to have to go through the rape kit process afterward, but that doesn’t mean it’s a good idea to throw out standards for evidence collection. It also sucks to be convicted of a crime you didn’t commit, which is why we have those standards. I don’t know that I support government bans of the kits, but it does seem pretty egregious to exploit rape victims and discourage them from actually getting admissible evidence collected. The headline makes it sound like the government is denying women a genuine alternative, but that really doesn’t seem to be the case here.
many sexual assault victims ... avoid law enforcement and traditional methods of reporting and seeking help.
Meaning they don't want the law's help. Full stop.
Which means they have zero shot at a criminal case, and little-to-no shot at a civil one.
Leda "does everything it can to supply admissible results," including offering a full chain-of-custody report.
Yea, except for the chain of custody between the kit's user and returning it to Leda.
This is so extremely prejudicial against the accused, I can't believe we're even considering it. The reason States are banning it is simple - it'll NEVER survive Rule 901. Ever.