1 in 3 College Students Say Violence in a Campus Protest Can Be Acceptable, Survey Finds
The survey of over 50,000 students also found that 37 percent of students said it was "sometimes" or "always" acceptable to shout down a speaker, up from 31 percent last year.

Thirty-two percent of college students believe it can be acceptable in at least some circumstances to use violence to stop a campus speech, according to a newly released survey of over 50,000 college students from 258 universities. The survey, conducted by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), a First Amendment group, is the fifth released by the organization.
FIRE's survey polled students on a range of questions about their attitudes toward free expression and the general climate at their universities. FIRE also ranked schools based on student reports, as well as their formal speech policies and their administration's history of speech-stifling actions.
The public University of Virginia (UVA) took the top spot this year, while Harvard—for the second year in a row—came in last place. However, FIRE's ranking process is complex. UVA, for example, came in first place primarily due to consistent administrative support for free speech. But when looking at subcategories that cover student opinion, UVA ranked 200th for support for disruptive conduct and 112th for self-censorship.
"The student body overturns a certain amount every year. Presumably every four or five years it's an entirely new student body," says Sean Stevens, FIRE's chief research adviser. "But the administrative culture, kind of the culture established there can stick for longer."
The survey also found sharp increases in students' support for disruptive or violent protest activities. Thirty-seven percent of students said it was "sometimes" or "always" acceptable to shout down a campus speaker, up from 31 percent last year. In all, less than 1 in 3 students said that it would "never" be acceptable to shout down a speaker.
The percentage of students agreeing that it was never acceptable to use violence to stop a speaker also declined five percentage points—declining to 68 percent from 73 percent last year. While this means nearly 1 in 3 students expressed willingness to support violent protest, it's worth noting that this doesn't necessarily mean that those students would ever participate in violence themselves. Further, FIRE's survey didn't define violence or give an example of a violent action. Regardless, the upward trend in support for violence, in at least some circumstances, is troubling.
It's likely that the contentious, frequently disruptive anti-Israel protests that dominated many campuses last year played a role in the shift. Fifty-five percent of surveyed students agreed that it is "difficult to have an open and honest conversation" about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, more than any other topic.
Over the past five years, "the trends are going in the bad direction," Stevens says. "More people are saying it's acceptable to shout down the speaker, to block entry, to use violence."
For the first time, FIRE's survey asked students about their mental health. Over 60 percent of students reported that they felt anxious at least half the time—including nearly 7 in 10 female students. Almost 40 percent of students reported feeling lonely or depressed at least half the time.
Over 1 in 4 students reported having three or fewer close friends—including 30 percent of Harvard students, a staggering 17 percent of whom said they had zero close friends.
Stevens says that those results were "more upsetting than I would have expected," adding that while it's unclear whether students "would get a diagnosis of depression or they would get a diagnosis of generalized anxiety, if they are saying they feel that way, I think that matters."
But FIRE's report didn't turn up all bad news. Student worries about self-censorship seem to be steadily declining. Forty-five percent of students reported that they felt they could not express their opinion on a subject because of how others would respond at least "occasionally" or more. Compare that to last year's 50 percent and the 2022–23 school year's 56 percent.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
These kids are being groomed to violence.
They are. They've been taught that violence and shouts against unapproved thoughts works. They'd have to be pretty damned stupid to not learn from that.
I wonder if they’ll still believe in violence after they leave their playpen.
Government violence on their behalf, against their oppressors, sure.
We have Dear Leader to THANK for His Blessings Upon Political Violence!
Trump offers to pay legal bills for violent offender at Trump rally…
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-trump-campaign-protests-20160313-story.html
Trump’s endorsement of violence reaches new level: He may pay legal fees for assault suspect
Trump agrees with “Hang Mike Pence!”
https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/25/politics/donald-trump-january-6-mike-pence-chants/index.html
Trump reacted with approval to ‘hang Mike Pence’ chants from rioters on January 6
OT Post: “Hang Mike Pence” may very soon be supplemented by “Hang Governor Kemp” of Georgia… Hang ALL of those who do NOT pervfectly, precisely toady up to Trump ass Trump demands!
Governor Kemp (R) of Georgia is latest target of Trump Wrath… https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/03/donald-trump-brian-kemp-rally-atlanta/ (paywalled) and https://apnews.com/article/trump-vance-atlanta-georgia-harris-rally-b21c25bbbfafdd0343c8812f6c3d7c9e
Trump again tears into Georgia’s Republican governor on the same day he campaigns in the state
Kemp, that unkempt, uncouth infidel, stole The Donald’s Sacred Erection!!!
Rilly? "I didn't quite make it, just a little bit short."
-- Trump, on 2020 election, 8/22/24
"He beat us by a whisker."
-- Trump, to Moms for Liberty, 8/30/24
"I lost by a whisker."
-- Trump, to podcaster Lex Fridman, 9/3/24
Orange MAGAt lost the popular vote twice and the electoral once for a 0.25 batting average in a one-term career. Sad.
The red guard doesnt create themselves
So they’re totes ok with me bringing a bunch of big dudes on campus and beating the shit out of all the neo Marxists and pro Hamas protesters?
Sounds awesome, and I can always use a little additional exercise.
They are being taught the theater/drama of protest. Not citizenship.
Infantilizing the population
But not words, those are super scary and hurtful.
Our violence is speech, your speech is violence.
Good summary.
Silence is also violence.
I have a gun, do you?
I'll see your gun, and raise you an F-15.
- Some random old white guy
Hey, I'm a random old white guy. Can I get an F-15?
Actually, you can:
https://www.twz.com/32869/this-man-owns-the-worlds-most-advanced-private-air-force-after-buying-46-f-a-18-hornets
I have a new man-crush.
And a new idea about a Second Amendment Supreme Court case.
Too much storage involved, I want the Iron Man armor. And as I identify as billionaire Tony Stark, I’m entitled to it.
The first rule of Gun Club is don't talk about your guns.
Western civilization is coming to an end.
The Romans were at least conquered by barbarians, let’s not be conquered by baristas.
What if we don't tax their tips? Will they give us another year?
If only Kamala hadn’t broken the tie vote on allowing the IRS to tax tips.
Have no fear, her values haven't changed. Just her vote-counting skills.
You'll have to pay off their student loans first. Then we can talk.
Civilization ends when people stop acting civilized.
Which was sometime in 2020.
It was just laid bare in 2020 by the rabid enthusiasm for COVID fascism.
Yeah, and forgiving debt (which you promote) is a cause. Pay your bills and quit whining.
Student worries about self-censorship seem to be steadily declining. Forty-five percent of students reported that they felt they could not express their opinion on a subject because of how others would respond at least "occasionally" or more. Compare that to last year's 50 percent and the 2022–23 school year's 56 percent.
Alternate interpretation: Each year, the kids are more leftist/woke and don't even have thoughts/words that they fear would not be tolerated. They believe and say woke things, so the uber-woke campuses would have no problem with what they'd say. It's not the College Republicans or Students for Liberty shouting down speakers or threatening violence.
I am glad someone said this. Every year the class of students trained in the least radical ways are graduated out and replaced by a Freshman class that has been educated in more radical ways. Each Freshman class will likely have statistically more women, BIPOC, LGTBQ, or any other non-male, non-cis, non-white, or non-normative people than the Senior class that left.
FIRE should track by class and not simply by institution to see if this holds true. Look for any correlated demographics. Poverty? Privilege? From a coast or rural America? Engineer student or prospective lawyer?
The info FIRE gathers is good and valuable... but with limitations that should be easy to correct for over the coming years by better parsing and demo information.
Was there a follow up question asking how the respondent would feel if violence was used to keep them from stopping the speaker?
Anyone asking THAT question?
You got me by 33 seconds!
Words are violence, speed is victory!
But victory is oppression, so you lose.
Or if violence was used to keep them from speaking?
Follow up question should've been asked: "what if the violence is directed at your group?"
Willing to bet 0 out of 3 would consider that ok.
As always, that's (D)ifferent.
You guys are thinking about this all wrong.
Give them violence. Then do it again, and again, until it penetrates their skulls.
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.
H. L. Mencken
Thirty-two percent of college students believe it can be acceptable in at least some circumstances to use violence to stop a campus speech[.]
"I find these rules of engagement acceptable."
While this means nearly 1 in 3 students expressed willingness to support violent protest, it's worth noting that this doesn't necessarily mean that those students would ever participate in violence themselves. Further, FIRE's survey didn't define violence or give an example of a violent action.
So, what are we talking about?
Scary clikbait?
Settle down. Young people have always been retards. That's why so many cultures sent them away on missions, crusades, vision quests, raiding parties, find yourself adventures, etc.
And, yes, as we delay adulthood, the stupid child phase extends into college ages. So of course they support violence. And censorship. And theft. And special privileges. And banishing doodoo heads. And nanny care.
If the college leadership acts the same, then we might worry.
There is a difference between "There have always been retards," and "The number of retards is becoming worryingly higher year over year."
There has always been fire... why are you worried about it being all over your roof and yard?
Perhaps, but I also try to correct the increasing number of retards with my personal getting older and grouchier factor.
I have also been struggling with this correction factor.
I'm... rapidly approaching fifty, now. I understand that there have been old dudes lamenting the youth for as long as there have been written records of old dudes and youth.
But holy shit many days we seem to be in hyperaccelerated Clown World.
"Is the world really this insane, or is it just me ossifying?"
50? I bet you still think the world should make sense.
I am getting close to 70, and gave up on that. Now I just hope that if we reach peak retard I will be around to see it.
What's your retirement plan?
Oh... you know. Live long enough to laugh myself to death for living this long through all this shit.
Beer and whisky help.
What’s your retirement plan?
Possibly 10mm, maybe .45WM. Though it's looking like pure nitrogen "OD" is a pretty guaranteed and painless method. And a tank of that plus a breathing mask should still be affordable at that point, I hope.
If Kamal gets selected, the country will al sot certainly experience an anti communist revolution. In which case I intend to construct. Retirement home built from the skulls of Marxists.
50? I bet you still think the world should make sense.
Hrm... I'd say I'm closer to "still wanting it to make sense, but strongly beginning to suspect that's unlikely".
I'm also rapidly approaching 70 and I wasn't too worried about the millennials. But I'm getting worried about the generation coming up. Although they're probably more likely to stay off my lawn to be fair.
Perhaps you missed your latest HR training. This metastasized out of the campuses and "young people" years ago.
Who doesn't love a yellow school bus, right? Can you raise your hand if you love a yellow school bus? Many of us went to school on the yellow school bus, right? It’s part of our experience growing up. It’s part of a nostalgia, a memory of the excitement and joy of going to school to be with your favorite teacher, to be with your best friends and to learn. The school bus takes us there,
...
[awkward, out of place tween girl giggle]
Didn't she go to a boarding school in Canada?
The college leadership was mostly encouraging it, then reluctantly and strategically pushing back a bit, once they realized that alumni donations were drying up.
Aren't these the same clowns that say that offensive terms or deadnaming or whatever are literal violence against them?
This number will drop fast when students realize they can face expulsion and permanent financial aid eligibility. Most don't mind misdemeanor arrests, but the other can be a career death sentence. It is something of a shame that higher education financing works this way even though I won't support violent demonstrations.
This number will drop fast when students realize they can face expulsion and permanent [loss of] financial aid eligibility.
(Correction in quote to what I presume you meant, feel free to correct me if I was mistaken.)
This number will drop fast if students face expulsion and permanent loss of financial aid eligibility. But I've not seen a lot of sign thus far that this is the case. We've seen actual hostage taking be dismissed entirely by these schools, so far.
The consequences I would have expected long ago have not yet materialized.
In other words, 1 in 3 college students are fascists.
The prefer "social justice warrior".
But they still view the campus as activist encampment and indoctrination center, not a place for academic inquiry and learning.
I would prefer they be subsequently be referred to as ‘corpses’. Although I’m willing to accept a woke term, such as ‘life challenged individual’.
But FIRE's report didn't turn up all bad news. Student worries about self-censorship seem to be steadily declining. Forty-five percent of students reported that they felt they could not express their opinion on a subject because of how others would respond at least "occasionally" or more.
This could just mean that people feel more comfortable expressing, say, their rampant antisemitism because it's more acceptable these days.
Not saying that's actually the case, but there are several ways to read this that aren't really favorable.
Mob agrees that mob violence is okay, who would have guessed?
When you're told that "words are violence" and even "silence is violence," it's a short jump to responding to those "violent" words or silences with actual violence.
"Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me" was the mantra when I was a kid.
A tire iron works better than a stick.
"1 in 3 College Students Say Violence in a Campus Protest Can Be Acceptable, Survey Finds."
...just as long as those same students don't get their candy asses kicked.
Asses kicked? More like as long as they don't have to buy their own tampons and eat something with gluten.
This is news? Three in 3 rent-a-cops and gubmint qualified immunities swear that violence is what the looter Kleptocracy pays them to unload on uppity stoodints. As long as folks keep voting for the initiation of force' that's what they've got coming... all the way to Dresden and Nagasaki.
You have to be careful with survey questions that include "never" as one of the possible responses because it might only be measuring the creativity of the respondent.
68% of respondents think that it is "never acceptable" to use violence to stop a campus speech.
Never? Really?
What if robots are on a murderous rampage and you have discovered a flaw in their programming which could be exploited and end all of this carnage but it requires punching in the nose the person who was scheduled to speak on campus this morning?
Apparently two thirds of respondents would rather see humanity devoured by Roombas than do what might be necessary to save them.
Is that why John Quincy Adding Machine couldn’t keep his campaign promise to not go on a killing spree?
I'm curious. Do conservative kids protest? Is there a trend of conservative protests turning violent? It seems to me that the issue is radical left-wing activists (both on and off campus) engaging in tons of protests and a notable number of them involving vandalism and violence. I have a feeling that this breaks strongly along the lines of political affiliation. Bypassing that part of it just ignores what the actual problem is
Speak softly, and carry a big caliber weapon.