Cornered Maduro Moves To Jail His Opponent
The arrest warrant against Edmundo González, the recognized winner of the contested Venezuelan election, only fuels the opposition's resolve against the regime.

Venezuelan authorities have issued an arrest warrant for Edmundo González, the presidential candidate who has been recognized as the winner of the disputed July election against Nicolás Maduro. The move marks an escalation in the Maduro regime's crackdown on the country's opposition.
On Monday, the public prosecutor's office announced the arrest warrant, accusing González of "crimes associated with terrorism," including "usurpation of functions, forging a public document, instigation to disobedience of the laws, [and] association to commit a crime and conspiracy." The charges follow González's failure to respond to three summonses related to the government's ongoing investigation into the contested election.
Maduro was declared the official winner of the July 28 election by Venezuela's National Electoral Council (CNE), securing a third consecutive six-year term. However, the outcome of the election has been disputed by the opposition and remains unrecognized by much of the international community.
According to the CNE, which is controlled by Maduro loyalists, Maduro allegedly won 51 percent of the votes, with González receiving 44 percent. But the opposition contends that these figures are fabricated, pointing out that Maduro's United Socialist Party of Venezuela refused to publish the official results.
In response, the opposition released its own election data, claiming that González won against Maduro by a significant margin. "Venezuelans and the entire world know what happened," González said at a press conference after the elections.
Despite attempts by Maduro's regime to block access to voting centers, the opposition managed to review the votes of around 80 percent of the 30,000 voting machines. Their findings, published online for the world to see, support that Maduro stole the election.
According to the opposition's results, González won the election with 67 percent of the votes, compared to Maduro's 30 percent. Several world leaders, including the United States, have recognized González as the legitimate winner and called for transparency from the Maduro regime.
Facing mounting pressure, Maduro requested Venezuela's high court to audit the electoral process—a move criticized by foreign observers who argue that the court is too closely tied to Maduro to conduct an impartial review. On August 22, the court concluded that the election results published by the opposition were false.
Following this decision, the prosecutor's office launched investigations into González and other opposition figures. After González ignored three summonses, the prosecutor's office warned last Thursday that an arrest warrant would be issued, citing "risk of flight."
González had dismissed the summonses, citing a lack of due process and asserting that the charges against him are baseless. He said he would not subject himself to questioning "without specifying in what condition he is expected to appear" and what crimes he has allegedly committed.
In a state television broadcast, Maduro lashed out at González, saying: "This man has the nerve to say he doesn't recognize laws, he doesn't recognize anything. What's up with that? That's unacceptable….Citizens agree that laws have to work and that officials do their job."
González and the opposition deny any wrongdoing, including the accusations brought against him by the prosecutor's office. He has been in hiding since July 29, the day after the elections.
"Maduro has lost all touch with reality," said opposition leader María Corina Machado on Monday, whom González replaced on the ballot after Maduro barred her from running in the elections. "The arrest warrant issued by the regime to threaten President-Elect Edmundo Gonzalez crosses a new line that only strengthens the resolve of our movement."
"Venezuelans and democracies around the world are more united than ever in our quest for freedom," she added.
Maduro's disputed victory has ignited waves of mass protests that have lasted for weeks, resulting in at least 27 deaths and 192 injuries. Additionally, over 2,400 people have been arrested as Venezuelan authorities launch a crackdown on opposition members and protesters who speak out against Maduro's regime.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
At least Jack Smith, Letitia James, and others may have a job next year.
No, no, no. I have it on good, libertarian word that a duly-elected President firing unanswerable civil servant bureaucrats is more in line with evil, Soviet purges than it is with anything resembling liberty or justice.
Sad to say that just 5 years ago, we'd have a leg to stand on in criticizing this.
Cornered Democrats move to jail their opponent. Reason: Oh that's cool. Cornered Maduro moves to jail his opponent. Reason: OH MY GOD!!!!!
Maduro: “I learned it by watching you!”
Kamala is taking notes.
kamala can write?
Golly, trying to jail his opponent on ridiculous novel charges. Where have I heard that before?
Putin? Xi? Kim Jong Un?
Hmm, what a puzzler.
It’s a mystery that can never be solved.
The idea of such dastardly political machinations from a tin pot dictator!
Biden is not "tin pot". He's world class.
Pewter pot, then.
This could never happen here; right? Right?
Rest easy Quo. The libertarian press would never allow it.
I imagine Reason would be all over it if they did.
does Jimmy Carter know about this?
Stalin.
Hitler.
Mao.
Castro.
Maduro.
I'll let you guess what they all have in common.
They all wore sexy underwear?
Democrats?
Jews?
Edmundo González, the recognized winner of the contested Venezuelan election
The election was certified and Maduro was declared the winner. It's extremely concerning to see Reason descend into these election denialism conspiracy theories, considering the danger they pose to our democracy.
They’re proud of their hypocrisy. I think they even get off on it.
Edmundo González is an insurrectionist and an election denier. They should kick him off social media so nobody can hear his
caselies.Communist steals an election.
Moderate wins fair election.
Reason right-wingers: "these are the same thing!"
Communist steals an election.
Facist steals an election.
Well, they're not exactly the same, I guess.
The Right did not decide that questioning an election was an insurrection.
You made the rules.
It was more profound than that; questioning an election result became a kind heresy to the civic religion.
And yet, just five years ago...
https://theweek.com/speedreads/849983/jimmy-carter-says-trump-didnt-actually-win-election-2016
Remember Al Gore.
The hilarious irony is that for 20 years the Jimmy Carter commission fir monitoring unfair elections was the use of... mail in ballots. And evidence of fraudulent elections... late night electoral swings.
Maduro refuses to release election data. Docrats refused to release election data.
Maduro opponent demanded to see election data. Trump demanded to see election data.
Maduro arrested and went after opponents lawyers. DoJ and states arrested and went after opponents.
Maduro opponent showed statistical data showing the results were wrong. Trump showed statistical data showing results were wrong.
Yeah. Nothing the same at all shrike.
Only Democrats can say cleanest election ever and get away with it while locking up or charging over 20 people for election claims. They are your good guys.
Ignore the multiple election trials showing illegal voting. Ignore the tens of thousands of double voters. Ignore mail in ballots to gas stations. Ignore Fultom County recounted 3 times and got different results each time. Ignore Fulton County didn’t have ballot images for 15k of their ballots. Ignore Arizona having 2k provisional votes because Hobbs office switched voter registration to vacation homes. Ignore the statistically dominant ballot printer issues occurring in conservative states. Ignore zuckerbucks funding elections by a 3 to 1 factor for dem areas. Ignore the old person homes in Wisonsin with 100% voting even for residents mentally incapacitated.
Cleanest election ever. Just like Democrats and Maduro say.
And then the cherry on top of still calling Joe a moderate. Fucking hilarious shrike.
Shitbag drags a strawman out.
FOAD, asshole.
It’s worse than that.
Because the evil left steals elections, and it’s ok to do anything wrong if the evil left did it first, it follows that stealing elections is on the table. Why wouldn’t it be? Democrats did it first. They should get a taste of their own medicine. Live by their own rules. It would be ok because Democrats did it first.
Besides, the left is stealing votes anyway. Team Trump committing election fraud would only even it out.
When will your liver finally take revenge and kill your retarded ass?
He would stoll vote Kamala even if dead.
How is this strawman working for you?
#NotALeftist.
Imagine calling the Junta controlling Biden "moderate".
There's nothing moderate about late term abortion and infanticide, there's nothing moderate about child castration and clitorectomies, there's nothing moderate about eliminating the borders and handing illegals free money and housing at amounts that even welfare leeches could only dream of, there's nothing moderate about trying to jail your opponent and when that didn't work, trying to shoot him, there's nothing moderate about illegally censoring citizens on the internet, there's nothing moderate about illegally forcing social media companies to help, there's nothing moderate about calling for limits to free speech, there's nothing moderate about siccing the FBI on PAC parents and Catholics, there's nothing moderate about forcibly discharging soldiers who refuse to be injected by an experimental concoction and encouraging civilian businesses to do the same, there's nothing moderate about arranging for a lunatic judge to order a complete shutdown of your political opponents company because the AG said that opening bids between expert level business entities constituted fraud in a consumer protection law, it's not moderate to shut down an eminently safe pipeline ostensibly to please greens, but also so one of your billionaire supporters can continue to ship millions of barrels of crude on his creaky, leaky rail cars.
At least *they* get bananas ...
Katrina Hall, we should get you and Sullum in the same room to discuss strategy.
Just make sure they're "fixed" first.
I don't get why dictators even bother holding Potemkin elections. Who do they think they're fooling?
-jcr
The simple fact that the ruling regime feels the need to arrest their opposition is indicative that there is a substantial strength in numbers in opposition to them.
Much like how Biden went after his opposition including jailing many of them, Maduro is lashing out against his opposition because there are enough of them to question his claims of winning the election.
If there were not enough opposition to worry either of them, then it would not be worth the bother to go after them.
I'm not saying that neither Maduro or Biden were legitimate winners, but I am claiming that there are legitimate concerns in both elections and the Biden and Maduro regimes used authoritarian tactics to silence their opposition.