Replacing the 7 Dwarfs in Snow White With CGI Is Not 'Progressive'
Disney said they wanted to "avoid reinforcing stereotypes." The company's solution was to take away roles from a group that has almost no opportunity in Hollywood.

Watching the new Snow White teaser trailer, which dropped last week, you'd be forgiven for being a bit confused. The live-action adaptation of the 1937 Disney cartoon still relies heavily on animation to fill out its cast. You'd also be forgiven for being confused by the reasoning.
In the trailer, we see Snow White, played by Rachel Zegler, twirling and making merry with her seven iconic companions, all of whom are portrayed with CGI. For those who've been following along over the course of production, that likely doesn't come as a surprise: Disney announced in early 2022 that the company would take a "different approach" to the septet of characters "to avoid reinforcing stereotypes" about dwarfs.
"It makes no sense to me," said the actor Peter Dinklage, himself a dwarf, on Marc Maron's podcast, prior to Disney's announcement. "You're progressive in one way"—casting a Latina as Snow White, he said—"but then you're still making that fucking backwards story about seven dwarfs living in a cave together. What the fuck are you doing, man?"
His objection quickly prompted Disney's response. The solution the company arrived at: replacing the characters with computer-generated renderings and declining to cast dwarf actors, who have next to no opportunity in Hollywood. That doesn't strike me as progressive.
Not everyone was thrilled. "It boggles my mind that a network, instead of listening to an entire community, [is] listening to one person," said Terra Jolé, a reality television star with dwarfism, who added that some of her family members auditioned for the film. "That's just how much pull this one person has created in this society because of where he is on the level of popularity."
Dinklage has indeed achieved a level of success that is rare for someone with dwarfism, gaining widespread recognition for his star turn in Game of Thrones. There are unfortunately a great deal fewer acting opportunities for those with the rare condition. Snow White was practically tailor-made to give the limelight to a group that has been systematically overlooked in casting. The rich irony is that those dreams were dashed at the behest of someone in their own community.
Do Dinklage's—and by extension Disney's—protestations against using dwarfs have merit? It's worth asking. Snow White's companions don't live "in a cave" as Dinklage suggests; they live in a picture-perfect cottage that looks like it was plucked straight out of a Bavarian village. But even if we were to accept Dinklage's characterization, Snow White is a fairy tale. It is fiction. It isn't real. That should be evidenced by the fact that, for example, Snow White's other closest confidants are the animals she meets in the forest. After watching the movie, I doubt I will come away with the impression that I could walk into the woods and befriend a deer, just as I wouldn't assume everything I saw about dwarfs mirrors the real world.
I'll no longer be confronted with the latter, because Disney reportedly refashioned the dwarfs as "magical creatures." Perhaps that's why this version has a truncated title; Snow White and the Seven Magical Creatures doesn't have quite the same ring. Whether or not the story will suffer remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: As is sometimes the case, in trying to signal virtue, Disney hurt the very people they were supposedly protecting.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Do Dinklage's—and by extension Disney's—protestations against using dwarfs have merit? It's worth asking.
No.
Did Dinklage protest casting dwarves?
He thought it was demeaning to depict dwarves as living in a cave.
But they live in a house? And subjugated a woman to perform household chores?
It always seemed to me that Snow White was about dwarves in the fantasy sense. Not in the genetic defect sense.
In any event, if you're going to have "characters of short stature" it seems weird to refuse to case short people.
Before they switched to CGI they were going to use a cast of “diverse “ actors of normal stature.
Did the seven diverse characters work as box checkers?
Was the story set at a FedEx hub in Indiana?
It's difficult to know how many boxes need to be checked.
In Pete B's case only one: gay. Competence wasn't one of the boxes.
Funny how Binion skipped right past that. I didn't know that they were outright removing the actors and tossing in CGI characters now.
I’m wondering how many more dailies and reshoots away Disney Corp.. Is from shelving this film and taking the tax write off.
Fuck him, also. The dwarves WORK in a mine, not a cave. And they're idyllic, upstanding characters.
I'm sure he's really offended by the fact that people have jobs and do physical labor in this strange tale.
Maybe there's a reason dwarves were employed in mines? The tunnels can be built cheaper, because they don't have to be as tall. Or maybe short people feel less claustrophic in what (for most people) would be tight spaces.
I mean, I employ hundreds of orphans in my monocle factory because young people have steadier hands and keener eyesight.
The tunnels can be built cheaper, because they don’t have to be as tall.
Not so fast. Instead of a 6-foot tunnel, now you have to carve a pair of 3-foot tunnels.
It always seemed to me that Snow White was about dwarves in the fantasy sense. Not in the genetic defect sense.
I get the impression that if it were socially/politically convenient to be victimized by the similarity betweeen ham and hamsters, Dinklage would eat a hamster sandwich in order to draw attention to himself.
You would think an actor in the US would be able to understand homophones and be able to distinguish free (gratis) from free (libre) without necessitating a righteous right cross right to the face, but here we are. All being retarded by Dinklage's retardation.
They didn't subjugation snow white, she wandered in while they weren't home and started cleaning. The retards that say that never saw the original
Hey, even a woman who "volunteers" to do domestic chores is being oppressed.
And, even worse, she doesn't know she is oppressed and needs a clowder of childless cat ladies to enlighten her; against her will, if necessary.
She is in fact, ‘subjugated ’ by the dwarves in some film adaptions of the IP. You can likely view scenes of Snow White interacting with different combinations of the dwarves, sometimes all of them, online. The queen and some other girls show up in other scenes.
I enjoy his acting, but like De Niro I find him to be a disgusting human being.
Exactly. They weren't victims of dwarfism, a disease that was named after short mythological beings, they were the actual mythological beings, dwarves. I thought everybody understood that.
You mean to tell me that a story which features a talking mirror as a primary character isn't a documentary?
I bet next they'll have some disclaimer tacked onto the front of Game of Thrones archives that it's not possible to book a flight to Westeros and see the wall of ice and the two remaining dragons in person either?
At least we'll always be able to go back and visit Alderaan whenever the need arises...
Didn't they originally cast a "diverse" set of 7 non-dwarves as her companions? I seem to recall a afro-haired regular height black woman in one of the first images of the dwarves.
And let's be real. Binion takes zero issue with all of the woke bs here. He cheers Zegler being cast in a role that calls for someone with milky white skin. He also likely cheers on her comments showing that she just wants to destroy any culture that isn't part of her new woke religion.
They did, and when a photo leaked out the public ridiculed it so much that they shelved the whole project until they could figure something else out.
Her wokeness wouldn’t bother me if she wasn’t going around shitting on the source material (the original Disney film, not the Grimm Fairy Tale).
It’s plain that this is a woke re telling of the Snow White story.
Which means that it will suck.
And no one will see it.
I don’t get why they feel any need to change these classic stories around.
If the point is to make money, all they had to do was film a live action version with a very pale actress and seven actual dwarfs
Instead, it’s preachy Wolk nonsense, and at least the conservative half of the country will refuse to see it.
Hard to make money when you alienate half your audience
Way to go, Dinklage. You made your millions and now have destroyed the likelihood of anyone like you achieving your type of success.
It's a freaking fairy tale. Grip yourself.
Dwarves in fairy tales were always magical creatures (or at least, non-humans), they weren't people with gland conditions.
The biggest offense is casting a Latina as Snow White. If you want to make a movie about folklore from a region, you don't get people from a different region. There's no shortage of folklore from Latin America, why not make a movie based on that?
Slow it down so some of us can say the same thing earlier.
I'm not sure how Snow White is a story specific to a location.
Yes, it's a story of German origin, but it's not about Germany. There's no particular reason the character has to be Germanic.
Besides, there are plenty of Latin Americans of Germanic origin. The Mennonites of Mexico still speak a German dialect amongst themselves.
We need a fantasy movie about the Amish not-so-snow-white-any-more woman whose fantasy of having 7 men-a-night was fulfilled by 7 Mennonite dwarfs!!!
(Her part should be played by none other than Spermy Daniels! ***IF*** her Pimp-Daddy Donald will allow it!)
Look, we’re talking about miners not minors, so why are you interested?
Zing!
Because:
mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
"Spouting nonsense is an end in itself."
You can look it up.
Well, while it is kind of awkward to bring this up, the character is called "Snow White" for a reason. It's not just a name, it's also a physical description. I guess Disney made a deliberate decision to ignore that, which is understandable. Certainly more understandable than using CGI for the dwarfs to avoid "reinforcing stereotypes", whatever that means.
'Dirt Brown and the Seven Magical Critters' just didn't have the established audience they were looking to pander to.
But think of the awards show speeches.
This porn parody writes itself.
I hve a feeling that ship sailed long ago.
There was, in fact, a parody of the original Snow White movie produced by Warner Brothers that was called "Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs". Yes, spelled like that. Sometimes called a "banned cartoon", it can be found online easily enough. The woman is not actually called "Coal Black" within the cartoon.
Link, please, or be assumed a bullshitter.
Or you could just google it. Here's the wikipedia page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal_Black_and_de_Sebben_Dwarfs
If a wokie watches it, is this what happens to them?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctUDMAcKqrE
Wasn’t hard to find
https://vimeo.com/860753431
That old Merry Melody fucking killed me
I bet she was looking pretty white by the happy ending of it
"Murder Inc. We rub out anybody $1.
Midgets - 1/2 price
Japs - free"
Wow. OK sometime between then and now we reached a vertex of racism because that Merrie Melodie is very hilariously racist. It's funny because of how inappropriate it seems today as I hope "Snow of Color and the 7 Diverse Magical Creatures" will be in 50 years.
There are some women you can book online that will rub someone out for you, but it’s going to cost a lot more than a dollar. Especially if you book them as a duo. You can also watch them rub themselves, or each other out too. For an added fee.
The cartoon was banned from getting aired on TV. They've done this for quite some time.
Next, HollyWeird will use CGI to replace all black and brown actors so ass to avoid “reinforcing stereotypes”. Black and brown actors (but not white ones!) will need to get REAL jobs!
When will the management, too, be replaced by CGI?
Well, while it is kind of awkward to bring this up, the character is called “Snow White” for a reason.
No it's not. Bubba's gone full retard and is farting in his own bathtub to laugh about it.
Even without the name 'Snow White', apples, huntsman, dwarves, queens, unrelated charming princes... it's a European/Germanic tale that anyone over the age of 8 would instinctively recognize as such. You absolutely can convert 'Yojimbo' to 'A Fistful of Dollars' and 'A Fistful of Dollars' into 'Once Upon A Time In Mexico' or 'Hamlet' into 'The Lion King', but to say "I'm not sure how Yojimbo is a story specific to Japan, A Fistful of Dollars to the early American Southwest, Once Upon A Time In Mexico to latter day Mexico, Hamlet to Northern Europe, and The Lion King to Africa." is just being retarded if not outright evil, especially in our current, "white replacement/you'll eat bugs, own nothing, and like it/all the statues have been torn down/global cultural hegemony" era.
Dude, the story is literally about how fair her skin is.
I should be clear that it's not awkward. That any awkwardness is likely due to undue genuflection or self-flagellation.
So name her Blanco Nieve?
Stereotypes about dwarfs (which we must all avoid “reinforcing ”) include that they are short, AND that they are real human beings! So then we MUST replace them with CGI NOT-real humans beings! THAT will sure break the Stereotypes!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_People Randy Newman told us all about shit!!!
Perhaps the fact that the titular charecter is named for her fair skin?
Hopefully you are consistent in your beliefs, and you have never used the words colonizer, cultural appropriation, racist to describe a person.
Worse. Casting someone of mild attractiveness and then Gal Godot as the step mother jealous of her.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA no, seriously?
Wow. *snerk!*
"You're incredibly jealous of your daughter's attractiveness."
"Bitch, have you even seen me?"
Chipper von asshole shitbag? Pretty sure.
I read on some subredddit that “the story is about her inner beauty, not how the Queen is jealous of her attractiveness!” I laughed for a good minute.
Really ironic that the actress they cast turned out to be insufferable the first chance she got to talk off-script, then.
I wonder if Eiger is wishing they'd been acquired instead of Warners' and they'd have been able to write off the whole project (and maybe Ashoka, and The Acolyte, Kenobi, Madame Web, and The Marvels) like WB got to do with Batwoman. Maybe get a new boss in there who's got the stones to tell Kathleen Kennedy to pack it in and enjoy being richer than god instead of destroying multi-$Billion IP franchises for the remainder of her natural life.
Honestly, with the way the management is run, WB would've been complacent with KK's Star Wars for a least a decade.
Dwarves in fairy tales were always magical creatures (or at least, non-humans), they weren’t people with gland conditions.
Back to ancient Egypt. Short people or people with genetic/gland conditions complaining about dwarves living in caves is like tall people complaining about Olympian and other Gods being depicted as living on the top of mountains.
Similarly, anyone complaining that they're depicted as child-like in a Disney movie should be forced to finance a Grimm-faithful children's movie directed by Ridley Scott.
Dwarves are a category of fairy, just like elves.
[tilts hand]
1. I have degrees in biology. This is not biology. There is no formal taxonomy.
2. In line with or derived from the above, this is a category error, like "Ford is a category of sports car, just like Ferrari." Dwarves, fairies, elves, etc., etc., etc. are all magical creatures, but there's no historical lineage or tractable biological artifact to demonstrate dwarves as category of fairies or vice versa. Especially considering that are modern interpretation of fairies (and others) is considerably different from historical ones.
Rachel Zegler is of Latin and Polish descent, though she does have darker skin tones than a character who is named "Snow White" should be. Casting her as Snow White is not so bad as crowing that they have done something extremely virtuous ("progressive") by doing so.
^This
I’ll agree. I don’t care about her casting. However, the self-congratulatory talks about how progressive it is got on my nerves.
Just like I didn’t care about Bailey being cast as Ariel as soon as I heard her sing. She was good.
However, the cheering about “Ariel is black now” and how "progressive" it was to case Zegler as a German character is just hateful. Especially compared to the vile hatred sent at Scott explicitly because she was half-white.
I can't stand the "Eyes wide apart." FAS-look that seems to be all the rage in Hollywood these days. It's like they listened to behavioral psychologists say how larger eyes are more engaging or attractive and fed the data into an AI that prioritized inter-pupil distance as the best average indicator of eye size and selected those people.
White is a fairy tale. It is fiction. It isn’t real. That should be evidenced by the fact that, for example, Snow White’s other closest confidants are the animals she meets in the forest.
It’s extra centrifugally-enriched retardation because the ‘dwarves’ in Snow White aren’t dwarves like Peter Dinklage is a dwarf, but are a race of mythical creatures, like Gimli or the Hobbits in LOTR. We don’t look at Orcs or Elves from fantasy stories and wonder to ourselves what genetic birth defect they must have and immediately start wondering how we can build wheel chair ramps and restorative-justice hiring practices to make their world a better place.
Wokeness is a special kind of genetic defect. That I will say.
I want to know if any of the dwarves were cast as people of color. That’s important.
Will the voice cast have any dwarves?
The adult version of it definitely will.
Most important.
Wizards of the Coast definitely cares about the genetics of orcs and elves. Mostly the racist genetics.
One of my favorite Bee pieces described how oppressed orcs were rightly decolonizing Middle Earth by killing off the white people.
Dozens of pregnant women, some bleeding or in labor, are turned away from ERs despite federal law
Wow, even the Seattle Times is backing away slowly from "Pregnant People".
Perhaps they have a biologist on staff.
Oh, so in your mind, the big issue with this story wasn't that the women were near death, but that they were described as women. Got it.
Nah, the big takeaway from the story is that women got pregnant.
And didn’t get abortions.
In Seattle! I didn't know it was legal to not get an abortion there!
Apparently, they still have reproductive rights, because it's not a red state.
aka - the right to reproduce
What's important was that when overly restrictive abortion laws resulted in women who nearly died from complicated pregnancies, the Seattle Times referred to the victims as women.
Why don’t you care about a man’s right to get an abortion, you bigot!
Besides being a leftist liar, Lying Jeffy is a whiny bitch.
How can such an enormous fat fuck be such a little bitch?
IMHO, I think Pluto is a magical planet and not a Dwarf planet! Restore it now!
^+1
It's literally got a heart on it.
"he said—"but then you're still making that fucking backwards story about seven dwarfs living in a cave together."
Uh, because that was the story as written? Does Dinklage, a great actor btw, want to rewrite all of Shakespeare? Don't answer that
Someone should tell Dinklage that there are no small roles, only small actors.
😉
That’s very reductive.
"It makes no sense to me," said the actor Peter Dinklage, himself a dwarf, ..
C’mon man, think big!
Dinklage was in a movie with a dwarf being played by a normal sized actor.
I’m sure he’s learned to enjoy the small things in life.
Wokeness is confused and self defeating.
They complain if someone makes a movie where a character is a dwarf, but then complain there are no opportunities for dwarf actors, then when you cast a dwarf in a movie where he's just another character that's treated the same as anyone else they complain it doesn't address the challenges they face as a dwarf.
But the real question is why Reason is wasting so much time and effort trying to fight a culture war over stupid things like this. Just drink the kool-aid you bigots!
Binion pounced!
And after purging all the consumer goods brands of mascots who were people of color, they will complain that they have no representation among product marketing campaigns.
It's not like aunt Jemima was a real person
The irony with Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben is that the terms "aunt" and "uncle" have actual racist origins when used to refer to older black people. It was when they were old enough that it was awkward to call them boy/girl, but white people still didn't want to call them sir/ma'am so it just became aunt and uncle.
Is it really racist, or did you or someone else make it out to be racist?
Whether or not the story will suffer remains to be seen
Oh, don't worry, it's Disney. The story will be hilariously tone deaf, simplistic, and stupid but it'll still sell tickets and nothing else will happen.
The fact that they gave the middle finger to people with an actual genetic disability is exactly what you'd expect from a company that wants to pretend to be 'progressive' but really couldn't give a flying fuck about any of that stuff.
You can tell from their choices that they don't really understand their progressive audience any more than they understand the rest of their audience. It's shit thrown at a wall, and if something sticks that's good enough for them. The rest they'll justify with their PR departments after the fact.
It's going to bomb and loose them money
No, Billy, that’s where you’re wrong. This is absolutely peak Progressivism. Trying desperately to prove that your values are so much better than what came before by any means necessary.
And if you disagree, we should see if this isn't an outgrowth of that famous progressive slogan, "The Personal Is Political." We can certainly call that progressive politics in action, the rise of second and radical feminism, and asserting that your identity was inherently tied into your political choices, and pushing people to recognize that their lives represented political activity.
Then you have another anchor of progressivist politics, a rejection of cultural appropriation. "My identity is not your costume" or "My culture is not your costume," alternatively. You can't risk looking like an offensive caricature because it might reinforce stereotypes. You can't even pretend to be a specific character because that character might be seen as representing something else. Don't you dare try to pretend you're someone or something else for a night just to have fun with it, that's offensive.
Dwarves not there to be entertaining. We can't risk showing dwarves or any people of small stature because we risk making them into stereotypes about that community.
Billy, or whoever makes the headlines, thinks this is stupid and doesn't want to tarnish the good name of "progressive" by associating it with this. You like progressivism, but you don't like this. The problem isn't people taking progressive ideology too far, it's the progressive ideology. This is it. It's inherently anti-liberal.
Disney exec: "Dinklage is complaining that we're using dwarves in Snow White and the Seven Dwarves. What should we do?"
Second disney exec: "I guess we're tossing the dwarves out of the script."
Disney DEI exec: "No, you can't say you're tossing dwarves! Words are violence! "
*then all 3 go an molest whatever children are currently on the payrole
Even if it hurts the groups you're trying desperately to demonstrate that you care about not hurting.
In the next iteration, Disney will reframe the dwarf colony as an oppressed workers commune, chock full of diversity. Snow White will be a drag queen. And the actual evil queen will be Trump. Or maybe DeSantis.
And Snow White won't be searching for a prince, she'll be helping the dwarves organize as a labor union. And her name will be Norma Rae White.
And the huntsman won't be a hunter, or a man. They'll be non-binary and environmentalists.
So... The acolyte?
Wait, Peter Dinklage is a dwarf?
All this time I thought he was a midget.
Also, why are we conflating two radically distinct things? Fictional dwarves (friendly but sometimes cantankerous drunks that spend most of their time underground) and biological dwarfism (being a midget).
Also, this movie is 100% doomed. I guarantee you it's going to be the hunchbacked toothless retard with low bone density borne of woke inbreeding. Zegler already poisoned that well (or, apple?) over a year ago, and if Disney thinks anyone is going to go for it at this point - oof.
But I can't deny that I'm super excited to see it bomb at Hiroshima levels.
Google has a helpful explanation:
Traditionally, the term “dwarf” was used to describe individuals with disproportions of body and limb, while “midget” referred to those of reduced stature but normal proportions; today neither word is used, and “little people” has become the preferred term for persons with extreme growth retardation. (talk about not watching your language -- retardation? yikes.)
So Villechaize, midget; Dinklage, dwarf. But now they're both little people. Which seems to diminish them somehow. And I'm pretty sure Dinklage calls himself a dwarf, or a person with dwarfism.
I thought "dwarf" was still okay, but "midget" was frowned upon. What do I know? It's hard to keep up .
And weren't the "little people" yet another group of mythological beings, anyway?
And it just keeps getting worse.
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2024/08/13/disney-pr-nightmare-rachel-zegler-declares-free-palestine-while-promoting-snow-white-trailer/
And the film is t set for release until next year. Since we all know Zegler can’t control herself, she’s going to keep sabotaging the PR for this turkey on a regular basis.
So what’s the over/under on Disney finally shelving this abortion permanently and taking the write off?
Doesn't matter, nobody is gonna fuckin' watch it anyway.
Cue the articles about how racist and misogynistic the audiences are.
So Disney will redouble their wokeness efforts until the audience catches on or until the company goes broke.
That would be a happy day; attributed to "go woke go broke."
Reason commenters: There was nothing wrong with Speedy Gonzalez! Bring him back!
Have you considered suicide?
I’ve been barking up that tree for years. He just won’t do it. Let’s hope that his next 55 gallon drum of Ben & Jerry’s is his last one. Fatfuck has got to be a prime candidate for a heart attack/stroke/diabetes. And I’m willing to bet that reaching for the remote is the extent of his exercise regimen.
They brought back Speedy Alka-Seltzer, didn't they?
Jeff, see the cartoon linked above, perhaps you will have a heart attack.
Retarded whiny bitch.
Everyone loved Speedy Gonzalez.
Especially Mexicans. Why wouldn't they? He was energetic, quick-witted, heroic. If he was a caricature, so what? He was a fucking cartoon with an individual personality and mostly positive traits.
Just like Khan from Wrath of Khan was really popular among Sikhs because he was clever, ambitious, and masculine. They liked being represented with positive traits even though he was the villain, and weren't fans of whitewashing Khan in Abrams' Trek movie.
What’s wrong with Speedy Gonzales?
Apparently the cartoons were put back on air after campaigns by Hispanic organizations to bring him back.
He was always portrayed as the smart one, had super speed, and always won. So I never saw how he was a negative stereotype. If anyone should complain, it’s the feline lobby.
Tulpa is spoofing you now too?
There was nothing wrong with Speedy.
There was nothing wrong with a French skunk either.
Because they’re fucking cartoon animals.
Fleischer Studios did the definitive Snow-White anyway. There's more packed into that 7 minutes of B&W short subject than Disney would ever do with a color feature.
Whether or not the story will suffer remains to be seen
No, it doesn’t. The dwarf issue isn’t the only albatross tied to a cinder block tied to this movie’s neck, wrists, and ankles. The lead actress, despite being wrongly cast and as part of her real-life persona of being an insanely egotistical, worldly-ignorant, vacuum of talent already basically told anyone whose loved the fundamental Prince/Princess narrative of this or any other Disney or other fantasy fairy tale romance movie in the last almost 100 yrs., this ‘remake of a classic’ is not for them.
If the movie doesn’t suffer from this, it’s because it’s been stabbed in the back, buried for a few months until Disney thought things would blow over, and what is now being put out is the reanimated corpse of the original remake.
The movie studios, like sarc, are totally out of ideas.
There are cruelly a lot of original films out there. They just don’t tend to be big budget studio films. The horror genre has seen a lot of originality over the last decade, and there have been some good lower budget dark comedies.
Well said. It will be a hit with critics and bomb with the audience . The Disney offical trailer has 63k likes out of ~ 7 million views
Someone needs to ask Dave Chappelle about this so that he can go off about how offended he is that Rocket Raccoon was played by the part of a CGI raccoon but that Vin Diesel voicing a barely-sentient, trisyllabic houseplant was spot on.
That trisyllabic houseplant grew on you though.
It’s certainly taken root in popular culture.
Were customers clamoring for a remake of snow white?
They should have remade it as, "Dirt Brown and the 7 mental disorders". Watch as Dirt Brown struggles alone in a basement with her 7 different mental disorders.
That's...actually a good idea. Even then it works better if they adhere closely to the looks of the classic story. They could do it kinda like Sucker Punch with 2 layers. To me it would have to be less about action and more about really fleshing out the representations of those mental disorders.
If all the mental disorders are represented as young girls who could kill you (thinking of Sucker Punch) even better. At least one of them needs a sword that is too large.
Or, just ‘Snow White: Blacked’.
Snow White: Blacked - 7 on 1.
Sounds familiar.
So, is this supposed to be a metaphor about the Harris administration?
Why not? If the foo shits...
This gives me hope that Disney may consider my reinvention of Rudolph - "Crueldolph, the black nosed paindeer"
"Crueldoph, the black nosed paindeer, had a very shiny gun"
It's progressive because of a Latino in Europe? That's where the tale is set but DEI.
CGI, while horrible, is the least of the issues. Star is horrible person. No prince charming. Other bandits etc.
Billy enjoy being in the theater with the other 5 people
Snow White was one of the first Woke characters on the silver screen. Of course, she was woke by Prince Charming, but she was Woke.
It's a stereotype that dwarfs are short. I want to see tall lanky dwarfs!