Review: James Retells Huckleberry Finn From Jim's Perspective
Author Percival Everett reimagines Mark Twain's novel from the enslaved character's point of view.

Percival Everett has breathed fierce life into one of American literature's iconic characters in James, a retelling of Huckleberry Finn from the perspective of Jim, the runaway slave.
James' conceit is that Jim is secretly literate and can speak with perfect diction. Twain's "painstakingly" studied "Missouri negro" dialect is a put-on that Jim and other slaves use to deflect white anger and suspicion. Everett is a sly writer, and he loves to employ this code-switching and the fictions of race for subversive comic effect.
But language is all-powerful in James. Early in Jim's journey, a slave steals a pencil for him—a hangable offense—so that Jim can "write himself into being."
"I can tell you that I am a man who is cognizant of his world," James, as he renames himself, writes, "a man who has a family, who loves a family, who has been torn from his family, a man who can read and write, a man who will not let his story be self-related, but self-written."
James' revolt against a society that defines him as property extends to the metaphysical. In his fever dreams he debates Voltaire and John Locke. He in fact writes himself out of Huckleberry Finn's unserious final act to pursue an ending that better fits his outrage and newfound agency.
Finn's key moment is when Huck declares he'll help Jim even if it means going to hell, but Everett reminds us that Jim is already there. James tells another man he was "born in hell. Sold before my mother could hold me." James is not a gauzy moral fable or boy's adventure, but a man's flight through the inferno of America's racial past that is by turns darkly funny and terrifying.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sounds like a struggle session in book form. No thanks.
Nope.
So Jim is now a Mary sue, got it.
Why are you reviewing fanfic with author self inserts?
That was my first thought as well, he just made Jim into a Mary Sue.
I feel like there had to be a way to tell Jim’s story without turning him into a Renaissance scholar, but I suspect the author isn’t capable of writing an actual character so he made Jim a stand-in for himself (which just makes him that much more of a Mary Sue)
Meh. Everett might be a writer on par with Twain, but I doubt it.
Let me guess, the book also reveals that Huck’s Pappy had a PhD in Differential Topology from Oxford and another in Quantum Mechanics from Harvard.
The idea for the book actually sounded like it might be promising. But, this review pretty much tells me that the author Mary Sued the character and imposed all the woke modern sensibilities we’ve come to expect on him. All of which is kind of pointless. Jim already was probably the most admirable character in the original, anyway.
Weird.
Its a white guilt struggle sesh until proven otherwise in today’s current media landscape.
Easy pass
Completely unnecessary. Part of the cleverness of Huck Finn is in Huck being an unreliable narrator. Jim’s perspective is in there, even though the story is being told from Huck’s POV; Huck thinks he’s taking care of Jim, but Jim is an adult and Huck is a kid, and you can see Jim is actually taking care of Huck.
Just taking the subtextual and making a whole text out of it doesn’t seem that interesting to me. And inviting a comparison of the author’s wit to that of Mark Twain is going to be a slaughter.
But Jim is still a cis-hetero male? Why bother.
Why bother?!
Because skin color is the most important thing.
I tried to copy Eric Frank Russell’s style in The Great Explosion for my own libertopia variant, and just couldn’t do it. Sounds like this guy’s no better a writer than me.
This sounds like the true story of Frederick Douglas. Born a slave, taught himself to read / write, became passionate and influential speaker & statesmen.
The authir might actually have to conform with what Douglas actually wrote and said, rather than coopt the fictional creation of a giant of American Literature and have his way with that character.
The only worthwhile work like this I’ve seen is Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are Dead by Tom Stoppard. It’s hilarious but you have to know Hamlet pretty well going in.
yes.
There are a number of books/etc based on some snippet of Don Quixote. The Idiot by Dostoevsky is the one I know where the main character is modeled on Don Quixote.
That’s a good book, but I was thinking more of a book/play where the story run alongside the main work.
R&G Are Dead is about what’s happening to those two when Hamlet’s not around. The same story told from the vantage of a secondary character.
Wide Sargasso Sea is another. It’s Jane Eyre from the vantage of the crazy woman in the attic.
why?
Also, instead of a raft, James builds a speedboat! And and, instead of being tricked by the conmen, James sees right through them, tears open his shirt to reveal a cape and uniform with a large B on the chest, as he captures the conmen and delivers them to the appropriate authorities before flying off to intervene in a feud. Oooh, and oooh, he descends from the sky with an angelic aura and stops an imminent battle between the two families, then he eloquently channels the knowledge of philosophers he secretly memorized, teaching them the value of love and tolerance as he presides over the wedding between the two families! Also, also, he adopts Huck and becomes a reliable and dependable father figure!
Well… wait, let’s scrap that last part. That’s not realistic at all.
On the positive side, it looks like you could easily slip into a lucrative role as a Disney/Marvel writer.
Word of advice, make James into Jamika, and make her a lesbian. And Huck non-binary. Boom, you have a 200 million dollar modern TV series.
I like it. I LOVE it! In fact, there’ll be a scene where we show that Jamika is the one who invented the pride flag, having killed Betsy Ross after accusing her of being a Zionist.