Dueling Meltdowns
Plus: Possible Fed rate cutting, a study in AI semiotics, and more...

First, the Republican meltdown over…people being biracial? Politicians code-switching? "I don't know, is she Indian or is she black?" asked Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, referring to his presumptive opponent Kamala Harris, at the annual convention for the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ).
"I've known her a long time, indirectly," Trump had said right before. "And she was always of Indian heritage, and she was only promoting Indian heritage. I did not know she was black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn black, and now she wants to be known as black."
"I respect either one, but she obviously doesn't, because she was Indian all the way, and then all of a sudden, she made a turn and she went—she became a black person," he added.
Harris is biracial, born to an Indian mother and a Jamaican father, which seems to really be blowing Trump's mind. He appeared to be trying to make the case that Harris code-switching, to appeal to black voters in speeches, is disingenuous. (Welcome to politics!) But it came off more as rude to biracial people, as if they need to pick an identity group.
"This room of mostly Black journalists is not the same friendly territory that the former president is used to on the campaign trail," reports The New York Times' Maya King. "As he cracks jokes and repeats falsehoods about his court cases and record, the audience is gasping and scoffing. Few are applauding or laughing."
At one point, Trump claimed immigrants are "taking black jobs." When pushed by a moderator to define what, exactly, a "black job" is, Trump claimed it was "any job." (If the claim is that Harris is disingenuous, pandering to black voters, it looks like Trump is cut from the same cloth.)
"Historically, the vice president, in terms of the election, does not have any impact," said Trump in response to a question about whether J.D. Vance would be ready for the job on day one. "I mean, virtually no impact…Virtually never has it mattered." It was a real shit show of an appearance, with Trump careening all over the place and very much failing to win over the room.
Trump later doubled down on his race comments, projecting headlines touting Harris' Indian ancestry on screen at his Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, rally:
The Trump campaign is projecting this on the screen above the stage at his rally in Harrisburg PA: pic.twitter.com/ZsGHAZaruk
— Olivia Nuzzi (@Olivianuzzi) July 31, 2024
Second, the Democratic meltdown over…journalists interviewing Trump: As if Trump's sort of strange race commentary weren't off-putting enough, many members of the media seem thoroughly unable to do their jobs when Trump is involved, in a sad redux of the last eight years.
"Trump's acceptance of NABJ's invitation prompted at least one high-profile member of the organization to step down as the co-chair of the convention," reported Voice of America. "Others expressed concerns that Trump would be given a platform to make false claims or give the impression he had the group's endorsement."
Journalists took to X to express their dismay at Trump even being invited to speak onstage at the NABJ conference, never mind the fact that the conference customarily invites candidates running for president to speak, so it would be out of step with tradition if Trump were randomly excluded.
On a personal note, NABJ has meant a lot to so many of us, so this has been hard to see play out on multiple levels. But I will never forget that Donald Trump insulted and was hostile to a Black female journalist in our own communal space and was unchecked. And the feeling of…
— Natasha S. Alford (@NatashaSAlford) July 31, 2024
Several journalists were seemingly unable to grasp the fact that Trump making strange comments, revealing of his character and his campaign strategy, which may in fact affect how some black voters view him, and those comments becoming a top domestic politics story is in fact a job well done. Journalists should know better than to equate interviewing someone with endorsing their beliefs. Also, didn't we already do this whole idiotic rigamarole years ago, the first time Trump ran for office? And the second? Can't we just cover the man, quoting what he says, without losing our minds?
The galaxy-brain take: "The question Republicans ought to confront before leveling any attack is: 'Will this energize my supporters more or hers?'" asks Abigail Shrier at The Free Press. "For nearly every ad hominem salvo currently flung at Harris, the answer is: hers." This most recent kerfuffle is no different. From a pure political strategy standpoint, it's not clear why Trump made the comments he did at the NABJ conference or how those comments will help him.
Scenes from New York: How to grow weed in your house or apartment (from Curbed).
QUICK HITS
- The Federal Reserve looks like it might cut interest rates in September, drawing widespread opprobrium from strategists in both parties: Democrats fear that it's too little too late to be a useful signal that inflation has been tamed (and President Joe Biden ought to be credited, in their telling), while Republicans fear it could be a messaging win for their opponents.
- "You almost have to feel sorry for Kevin Roberts, the ambitious president of the Heritage Foundation. He steered the venerable think tank away from some of its longtime conservative principles to court Donald Trump, only to be spurned by the temperamental former President he and his institution courted," writes the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal.
- So true:
semiotics is the study of signification, unpopular due to being too abstract
heres why it matters: you make a tech device, called 'friend'. it provides companionship. but to wear this wouldnt signal "i have companionship". it signals the opposite: it communicates your alone-ness https://t.co/7iuRIXjgiL pic.twitter.com/KIuAvX1pW3
— owen cyclops (@owenbroadcast) July 31, 2024
- "Kari Lake won the Republican Senate primary in Arizona…setting up a high-stakes contest in the fall for the seat of Senator Kyrsten Sinema, who is retiring," reports The New York Times. "And Republican voters ousted a top elections official in Arizona's most populous county who angered conservatives by defending the state's voting system against false claims that the 2020 election was stolen."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I don't know, is she Indian or is she black?
Is race the most important thing or not. MAKE UP OUR MINDS PLEASE.
Skin color is the most important thing.
It was at the “black journalist” organization, after all.
After the interview they broke fo the fried chicken and watermelon lunch
Dominoes pizza, actually.
In addition to Megan Theeeeeeeeee Stallion (so fucking idiotic) performing, free pizza was apparently also a big part of the draw for Kamala's little rally.
And possibly paid homeless people to attend.
https://x.com/DefiyantlyFree/status/1818685699983655116?t=mPekwf4SLUNlbOXVdrfV1w&s=19
[Video]
@jrand1685
I mean, checks out, especially if they were giving out free pizza at the rally.
[Pic]
I'm no biologist, but I always thought a stallion was a male horse.
Megan Thee Mare or Megan Thee Gelding doesn't sound as fierce though, I suppose.
Harris commonly campaigned as “Indian” up until she became Biden’s VP candidate. Then, magically, she became “black”, never mind that she was not and is not African-American in any way, shape, or form. Harris calling herself “black” should be seen as an insult to American blacks.
But if Trump points out obvious facts it qualifies as a meltdown. Weird.
Stay woke, Reason.
It's not like they're subject to free market pressures anyway.
She attended Howard and was a member of a black sorority.
She was president of the Black Students Law Association at UC.
This "Harris isn't black" nonsense is the icing on the cake of republican brain damage.
Yeah, the GOP should totally lean in to the idea of whitesplaining that she isn't "really" black.
You poor soy
Look's like Bubba's all in on the "It's what you identify as" horseshit, where you're a girl even if you have functioning testicles, and you're black even if you're actually South Asian and white, with a little bit of African from a group who was never ever American Black's.
Their response will be "but aha! She has black skin and therefore had to navigate white supremacist America as a black woman"
...and by that they mean Berkley, Canada, and San Francisco.
Not to mention her underprivileged socioeconomic upbringing as the daughter of two college professors.
Indian Brahman Class too
https://x.com/theantiherokate/status/1819008800675778764?t=oyZ0hUn8yPvT9VAm8dRU8g&s=19
Donald Trump is a red-blooded American. Kamala Harris is a foreigner in every sense of the word. Didn’t even grow up here. Her parents didn’t grow up here. They stopped here for a minute and birthed her. That is all.
The fight is American vs non.
Now do Rachel Dolezal.
Look, I know you and your progressive comrades are all-in on the mental delusion that "your truth" is whatever you feel, and that actual history and facts can be dismissed as right-wing constructs, but some of us might reference Kamala's family tree, and see her student activities a racial-cosplay. And her recent attempts to blacken-up her image, including some truly awful ebonics, as political posturing--and thus open to ridicule.
Now do Rachel Dolezal
Never stick it in crazy
I'm wondering if they're also going to lean into the nuttier, "she is barely of African descent at all" or the "she's from a slave owning dynasty" talking points I keep seeing thrown around by other me and the like.
It also looks like accusation of a cuckoldry fetishry may be making a comeback for the last 100 days.
MAGA doesn't want or need fiscal conservatives, pro lifers, blacks, bi racials, the childless or women because the great realignment has brought white male industrial labor union support to the GOP.
Kudos!
If you weren't beating off to little kids, shriek, you might be able to type out a coherent post.
Fuck off Buttplug, you angry little pedo, and quit sockpuppeting as me.
What part of those talking points is untrue?
Harris is as American black as my ginger ass.
She was black at Howard. Her birth certificate lists Caucasian and Jamaican as her race from either parent. There is plenty of video of her affirming her Indian culture and upbringing. She lived when a teen in Canada.
What about her, other than the accidental location of her birth is American?
She's certainly doing some racial pandering, which is annoying and unhelpful. But I don't think talking about it a lot is going to help her opponents. Stick to what an unqualified, silly person she is and the terrible policies she has supported..
Most Blacks probably wouldn’t have consider Kamala truly Black in the first place. So orange man’s tirade wasn’t necessary.
*black
A lot of them didn’t feel the same way about Obama, either. There were op-eds from black columnists back then talking about how Obama wasn’t really African-American in the cultural sense because he’d never been raised in that environment. He had grown up in Indonesia and Hawaii, in college was attracted to white and light-skinned women, and emphasized his Kenyan ancestry, not his skin color specifically.
The first time he ever really experienced being around AA culture was probably when he went to Chicago and needed to get his political career going. That’s also how he ended up marrying Michelle.
Obviously, that ultimately didn't matter because Obama was a Democrat, and they were Democrats, and were going to vote for him regardless. But it was observed at the time.
You could always blame Biden. He unnecessarily limited his VP candidate pool to black women, of which there were about 3 who were somewhat qualified (in the paper qualifications sense), if you squinted. One of those 3 was a communist and one was a lightweight, so that left Harris.
That's kind of what I mean. People know she's full of shit it's so obvious. Trump talking about it in his inimitable style isn't going to help change any minds and might be counterproductive. I think it is similar with talking about her fucking/blowing her way to the top. Lots of people think it's true. But having lots of men talking about it may just lead to more women solidarity around her.
I know it can be difficult for libertarians to understand politics, strategy, and human psychology, but give it a try.
It's a demoralization tactic.
The goal isn't to gain votes, it's to disrupt opponent's narrative and diminish the enthusiasm/willingness to vote for her.
Black people definitely have varied feelings regarding Kamala, and black Twitter reveals a surprising amount of disdain/rejection.
It's a worthwhile hit from multiple angles.
Well then I hope it works out. I'll be happy to be proven wrong if it works in Trump's favor. I want to see presidenr Harris even less than I wanted to see president H. Clinton.
Exactly. Her Jamaican father was only partly black. Are we back to the one drop rule? Was Obama half white / half black, or black?
If skin color is so all-fired important, so are these questions. Can't separate the two.
The one drop rule never went away, sadly.
The one drop rule still rules Democrat identity politics, ever since they conceived of it. Too bad, the one thing they should have aborted.
It's kind of in our whole culture too, at least to some extent. Hardly anyone calls Obama "white", for instance, even though he's just as white as he is black.
I do. You should see the look of disgust on self loathing white progressive faces when I point out that Barry is our first half white president. Haha. They hate that.
Liz doesn't seem to get he was making fun of the dems identarian politics and it played right into the outrage of it.
Liz is the tallest midget at Reason.
And he pointed out during that interview that (a) Kamala had been invited but turned it down, had the option of a Zoom call, and couldn't even manage that; and (b) the ABC camera crew were 35 minutes late.
I don't doubt the self-selected audience of "journalists" (regardless of being black) was hostile to him, but I imagine they at least realized the truth and meaning of those two complaints, which Liz conveniently left out.
So much of this.
But, none of the media would get that. They're just desperately trying to pin something on trump and hope to make this his binders full of women moment.
“At one point, Trump claimed immigrants are "taking black jobs." When pushed by a moderator to define what, exactly, a "black job" is, Trump claimed it was "any job." (If the claim is that Harris is disingenuous, pandering to black voters, it looks like Trump is cut from the same cloth.)”
Unfortunately, Liz has decided to start being retarded on purpose. Guess we know what Reason is going to be doing the next four months. Pretty disappointing, tbh.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/graphics/2024/02/10/black-owned-businesses-continue-to-grow-in-u-s-heres-where-they-stand/72507801007/
https://www.blackbusiness.com/?m=1
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/02/16/a-look-at-black-owned-businesses-in-the-us/
https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/a33561639/black-owned-businesses/
https://www.rd.com/article/black-owned-businesses/
https://fortune.com/2024/03/01/black-business-boom-reshaping-america-economic-landscape-entrepreneurs/
https://www.nbcnews.com/select/shopping/black-owned-business-guide-ncna1258948
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/who-is-driving-black-business-growth-insights-from-the-latest-data-on-black-owned-businesses/
https://www.npr.org/2022/03/13/1082519078/black-business-ownership-is-higher-than-pre-pandemic-women-are-driving-that-grow
https://www.michiganbusiness.org/news/2022/08/fostering-success-for-black-owned-businesses/
https://operationhope.org/initiatives/1-million-black-businesses/
https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2022/02/increase-in-number-of-united-states-black-owned-businesses-between-2017-and-2019.html
https://www.crainsdetroit.com/entrepreneurship/meet-10-black-entrepreneurs-rise-detroit
https://www.businessinsider.com/personal-finance/banking/black-owned-banks-credit-unions?op=1
I could literally do this all day. Again, very disappointing, because there’s no way Liz is this dumb.
She has bad takes, but today's roundup is uniquely bad in ways that she has shown herself to be better than. I'm not sure which is worse: she's actually this bad or if she's being directed to take these stances by KMW or Koch.
She said the same over on X, and she was dismayed regarding the responses.
https://x.com/lizwolfereason/status/1819007043635646948?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Honestly, Liz shouldn't be worried about what we say here any more than ENB ever was. The actual issue aside, if you're posting on a political blog, you're going to piss off at least a few people even if they normally like you.
Liz, since we know that you do read the comments, just post whatever the fuck you want, and don't sweat the sperging. That's what we do, and it's been that way ever since Reason set up the comment section.
Hey stop it. This is uniquely racist.
Dangerous to our (D)emocracy.
Just like you can't point out chase tells us he is gay every chance he gets as of it matters.
You just need your Trump decoder ring.
He's pointing out that Democrats will play up their race/religion/ethnicity depending on the audience. If they have multiple versions to call upon, all the better. And if anyone calls them out for it or suggests a political motivation, they're racist.
"...I did not know she was black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn black, and now she wants to be known as black."
Why is Trump not capitalizing Black when he says that??? The man is super racist.
Why didn't Liz?
She's a progressive, so super racist would be my guess.
She's simply reflecting the tone of the speaker.
Don't blame Liz. It's Trump who spoke the words uncapitalized.
You misheard. Trump said BLACK in all caps.
He should pronounce it like China.
BA LACK.
...the audience is gasping and scoffing.
This description seems dangerously close to racial stereotyping.
If you listen to the audio, most are laughing but that wouldn't do for the Leftist narrative now would it.
Kamal has less black support than Hillary
But which one had more black "boyfriends"?
Hillary isn't a lesbian?
This. I heard more laughter and chuckles than gasping.
That's another thing about that video. You watch it, listen to the ABC hack reporter and Trump and the audience ...
* The ABC hack is hostile as hell, on edge, angry, right from the start, leaning forward, almost ready to spit in his face.
* Trump is relaxed, talks easy, not fazed by her anger. The closest he gets to any anger is when she constantly interrupts him and he tells the crowd about Kamala declining to show up at all, even by Zoom, and about the ABC crew being 35 minutes late.
* And the crowd was laughing, at least some of them, and in a relaxed amused manner. They were not laughing AT Trump, they were laughing because he tells funny stories in funny ways.
* And then try to imagine Biden or Kamala or even Barack in that same situation, even with an adoring ABC hack fawning over them. They'd be stiff, all of them, disengaged, pandering. Kamala would cackle and offend everybody, Barack would be condescending, patronizing, looking down his nose at them all.
That difference in demeanor says it all as to why people support Trump. That Liz can't see it says all I need to know about her. You don't have to like his policies or what he says,but if you can't see why people like him, you are only showing your own narrow-mindedness.
Hey, quit believing your own lying eyes, and accept the lived experiences of whoever reports the interview for the NYT and Vox.
This was one of those where I didnt see any of it in real time or have the ability to watch clips, so I was just reading comments and articles about it.
Finally watched the clips and I was like....ok ya there were some gasps and some mixed boos in there, but I heard a hell of a lot of laughing and it didn't seem like it was directed at Trump.
This feels like one of those things where Rotten tomatoes tells me its a bad movie but ive heard from like 10 people its worth watching.
I use Rotten Tomatoes too to help decide if I should watch a movie. The trick is to give much more weight to the audience score instead of the critics score. If a movie is woke as hell, you'll often see a high critics score but low audience score, and vice versa for a movie that doesn't pander to the wokies.
There have been times, though, where RT has been caught falsifying the audience score. This happened with Woman King where RT showed near 99% for both scores.
But if you properly curate the audience votes, isn't that good for democracy?
"and about the ABC crew being 35 minutes late."
Shame on Trump for not respecting CPT
Timeliness is so White Culture.
Trump is relaxed, talks easy, not fazed by her anger. The closest he gets to any anger is when she constantly interrupts him and he tells the crowd about Kamala declining to show up at all, even by Zoom, and about the ABC crew being 35 minutes late.
One of the amusing moments was when he grabbed her water bottle while she wasn't looking and tightened the cap down.
Lol. I missed that.
“Shuckin’ and jivin’” is how I’d describe Reason’s support of Kamala Harris at this point.
It's a general observation on how establishment female Dems (especially white ones) in particular start affecting what they think are ghetto ways of talking when they're trying to fit in with black people. "How I Met Your Mother" even did a pretty funny parody of it with Lilly talking like a "sistah" around her black friend.
I find that affectation of different speech patterns to be one of the most annoying of the pandering shit politicians do. Like Obama putting on his southern preacher voice when addressing black audiences. Or Hillary putting on a southern accent when Bill was running. Painful to hear.
https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/white-liberals-present-themselves-as-less-competent-in-interactions-with-african-americans
Kamala suddenly has a new accent in Atlanta.
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1818685271530967331
Except now those same women include a big dose of what appears to be nihilistic groveling. Are they actually looking for absolution, or is this some privileged elitist mental defect I don't understand?
Can we get a Venn diagram from Kamala of these women and women who liked 50 Shades of Grey?
It’s both, although the stated point of “anti-racism” is that white people are always racist at all times, and need to put themselves through a lifelong struggle session and “do the work” (which is a marxist trope) to try and achieve the anti-racist/marxist utopia. That's not an exaggeration, it's specifically what Robin DiAngelo has stated repeatedly in her works.
Which isn’t possible, of course, because a utopia literally cannot exist. It means “nowhere” for a reason. But this is a hyper-materialist religious movement, and such realities have to be ignored to serve the “right side of history.”
Trump's acceptance of NABJ's invitation prompted at least one high-profile member of the organization to step down as the co-chair of the convention...
What's the J stand for in that acronym?
Journalismists.
"just kidding"
Speaking of racists, what does the 'B' stand for?
Inclusivity?
Don’t ask Trump. If he answers correctly Liz will get upset with him.
Jokes.
Jobs. Don't ask what the B stands for.
I'll see myself out...
Jitler?
No mention of the terrible performance from the first questioner.
exactly she was rude and her questions were accusatory they were not questions. they would never treat a democrat that way
And the liberal media complained she wasn't rude enough.
Would you expect anything else from evangelical true-believers?
The question Republicans ought to confront before leveling any attack is: 'Will this energize my supporters more or hers?'"
Seems like both parties could ask that of themselves.
Pretty sure they care more about the number of black men she arrested and sold for cheap labor as attorney General.
Kamala made a huge deal about being Indian for her career, while downplaying being black... Up until 6 month ago
Obama made a big deal about being Kenyan.
I’m guessing that Kamala just doesn’t want people to realize she shits on the street part of the time.
She's politically from SF, isn't shitting in the street a requirement there?
Depends. Is she Orthodox or Reformed?
Her family is Brahmin. I’m not an expert on the Indian caste system, but pretty sure they’re not shitting in the streets.
Yup, they have (sub)people to do that for them.
I'm pretty sure Brahmin is the highest of the 5 castes. Basically the elites of India.
Yes. I’m just not sure they don’t also shit it the streets sometimes.
touché
To the point he even claimed he was born there in his Harvard Law entry.
Nope.
Yup.
BIRTHER!!!
The amount shrike either doesn't know or lies about is astounding.
LOL, maybe you should gain some functioning memory that isn't tied to having to consult Google all the time, you slack-jawed shitlib.
That went well, gov’na shrike.
And yet none of you have actually provided evidence for the original claim. But like sheep, you just go along with it.
Note to JesseAz: still not shrike, you lying POS
It’s right there in the link, twerp. You really think he would have let that go without revision? The Birtherism is irrelevant to the fact that he readily promoted himself as a Kenyan because he thought it gave him more clout. It’s not like he’d be the first politically-minded person to fudge his background for that purpose. Ever hear of Richard Blumenthal?
Doubling down on stupid? Bold move.
The shrike doth protest too much.
"made a huge deal about being Indian for her career, while downplaying being black"
Which is fine because she is mostly Brahmin, then white, then finally a little bit of black.
But one-drop-rule, America, amirite?
Historical Democratic Party documents say yes.
Quarter white, quarter black, half Indian
And still somehow half Joker.
Only half?
Cite? And why are you so focused on her race instead of her policies?
Because she is?
Do you need a Jen Psaki narrative for your cite? This is common knowledge. There are videos and news articles showing it. You could even Google it.
An example. Takes 5 seconds.
https://www.businessinsider.com/californias-kamala-harris-becomes-first-indian-american-us-senator-2016-11
Sorry it wasn’t Jen psaki saying it.
And hilarious you are pretending dems don't practice identarian politics and push it as the narrative.
Where the fuck have you been sarc?
Reading Jen Psaki talking points.
I’m guessing it takes a while after downing a Colt 45 forty or five.
“Cite? And why are…”
And yet when you give him the cite he plans to flip out and call you a stalker, Kuckland.
I feel pretty sure that she voted for Joe Biden when the time came, so she must be black.
"Well I tell you what, if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black."
Harris is biracial, born to an Indian mother and a Jamaican father, which seems to really be blowing Trump’s mind.
Whooosh…..What is really blowing my mind is how someone can’t figure out Trump is poking fun at Harris’s racial fluidity based on the group to which she is currently pandering. But, can she get into a Delaware 7-11 without her slight Indian accent?
Did sarc sub in for Liz today?
She didn't sound that drunk.
She is testing out the Kamala wine mom theory?
I understand she suddenly got a southern accent when speaking in Georgia.
Democrat women appear to be struck by God and speak in tounges when talking to a southern crowd.
Seasoned with a touch of ebonics.
Sho 'nuf did
Does she even carry hot sauce in her purse???
She puts that shit on everything. Helps when she's gotta swallow something.
It isn't a woosh. Liz specifically noted that Trump was "trying to make the case that Harris code-switching, to appeal to black voters in speeches." Her contention is that his messaging came off poorly.
I thought he made the case succinctly. Clean and articulate.
Poorly with leftist journalists although many in the room thought it was "funny because it's true".
Yes, it comes off poorly to the affluent, white, progressive leftist like Liz and you but it is something noticed and resented in the Black community itself.
That's what I am curious about. How many actual black people might feel insulted by a mercenary cos-playing politician? (But how many of them will play along to achieve political goals?)
If they vote Democrat, they find it annoying if the merc is also a Democrat, but they let it go.
Yeah it seems like kamala's handlers are trying to walk a shaky line here. The black label is designed to appeal to white liberals but hard to see black guys at the barber shop buying it. But most actual African Americans will inevitably vote D no matter who's running so they figure it won't matter. White women historically are more likely to vote R and they are a larger constituency than black voters.
There is a chance it could backfire on the Democrats. It’s been interesting reading X and seeing a number of people critique Kamala’s facade.
She’s always been viewed as a fake ever since she got into politics. She likely glommed on to Howard for that very reason (because she could claim Jamaican ancestry), and that phoniness was a major factor in why her presidential campaign imploded.
She’s benefitted from being a cumcatcher for powerful men and running in jungle elections where the Dem nominee is practically guaranteed to win. The only time she’s ever been in a competitive race, she fell apart in a matter of weeks.
If she wins just from the sheer ennui of the “vote blue no matter who” tards, most of the evidence of her career is as someone who’s going to be massively alienating even to members of her own party. The tongue baths she's currently getting from the "how do you do, fellow whites" morons aren't going to change that.
Come on Overt. You know what she was doing.
Just because she is better than ENB, you don’t have to kiss her ass.
A much more appealing prospect though.
100%!
Progressives pounced when Perot said he was honored to speak to "you people" when addressing a similar Black organization, even though that was a common way of speaking among people his age, and he addressed them respectfully.
Frankly, Trump should’ve just said something like “if you ain’t voting for Trump, you ain’t black!”. That seems to work.
I bet that would've went well over better.
That would've been pretty fucking clever tbh.
Fuck off Buttplug, go bleach your sheets and starch your cone.
Wait, are you saying the Democratic (presumptive(assumptive?)) nominee for President and the DNC-media machine is both pandering to its base and lying about it?
Maricopa Co in AZ is guilty of rigging an election
No wisdespread election rigging.
That's just one county that's been proven. That proves nothing.
The Maricopa election lead was ousted yesterday in the primary. The biased retard even created a PAC to fight against election integrity. Glad to see him go although he is still the lead for the next election so expect the usual fuckery.
...it's not clear why Trump made the comments he did at the NABJ conference or how those comments will help him.
Pretty certain he wasn't getting any of those votes.
Trump making racial identity appeals about "black jobs" is a mixed message while pointing out the hypocrisies of Harris's racial identity appeals to, well, racially bigoted voters. Maybe all such racial appeals are noxious?
Perhaps all bigotry is noxious, no matter whether it's based on race, nationality, income, political party affiliation...
Was it Kierkegaard or Dick Van Patten who said, "If you label me, you negate me"?
Get woke! All left wing good racism >>>>> MAGA Nazi racism!
I'd like to think it was Dick Van Patten in his role as the dad on "Eight is Enough".
If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would promise them missionaries for dinner.
H. L. Mencken
A shame Mencken isn’t around today. He’d have a field day making new quotes by the gross.
Mark Twain, too.
“Me too.” -Ben Franklin
Psst. Ben, be careful with those words. I hear you were quite the frat boy back in the day.
You mean gang rapist.
All those guys are racist, so no dice.
Calling white guys racist is racist.
No, failing to call white guys "racist" is racist.
Failing to not be white is racist
What about claiming people only criticize Chase for being gay? Asking for jeffsarc.
The Federal Reserve looks like it might cut interest rates in September, drawing widespread opprobrium from strategists in both parties...
Then I wholeheartedly support this action.
It has been said here many times they would drop interest rates just prior to the election. Total coincidence, right?
STFU! I really want to refinance the house I bought last year.
Vote for Giant Meteor, and your mortgage will not matter.
Doubt mortgage rates drop at all as they know rates will go right back up the quarter after the election.
You almost have to feel sorry for Kevin Roberts, the ambitious president of the Heritage Foundation.
For being hit or miss on SCOTUS recommendations?
I feel sorry for members of the Reason Institute for becoming irrelevant apologists for Koch Industries.
Don’t feel sorry. The brown envelopes make it worth it.
Is it his fault the WEF plan is 5 years behind his organization's plan?
No mention of Harris' gun confiscation, I mean "buyback", program?
100 days for congress then EO?
They will save that for the "There was no way we could know she'd do this" articles after the election.
Sometime early in 2027.
That's why their votes for Harris will be "reluctant."
Don't forget about "strategic." I mean, it's half the Reason writers' wise formula for voting.
Reluctant and strategic.
No mention of Harris’ gun confiscation, I mean “buyback”, program?
That’s not a libertarian issue, mkay?
And luckily, the fucking Democrats don’t have any plans to make the rest of the country just like California.
Libertarians for Newsom!
They will get most of them for free.
From cold dead hands.
...defending the state's voting system against false claims that the 2020 election was stolen.
FALSE CLAIMS. IT IS WRITTEN.
Having lived through the 2000 election, I really do not remember Al Gore being castigated for putting the country through electoral uncertainty by litigating his false claim that he won Florida.
Good thing he didn't try that BS in Georgia. He'd be put on trial. Right?
Its (D)ifferent when they do it.
We all might be better off if Al Gore succeeded.
Who's your dealer, and does he have any more?
After all, he did such a fabulous job with the internet.
We all know Al Gore invented the Internet but how many know who invented the piano necktie?
Jacob Mootberg
https://youtu.be/tOrI6uqS-vk?si=tit-rw_2koHhSJxa
+
If Gore had won, at least global warming would have been treated seriously, and Florida would still be above water.
I was in Miami recently and didn't notice that I was underwater.
And people forget that the Supreme Court ultimately slapped him down because he was trying to limit the recount to heavy Dem counties, not the entire state.
Honestly, more than anything else, post-2000 elections should be a clear lesson not to actually concede anything the night of the election, even if you're way behind. Too many reindeer games to not wait until the final certification takes place.
Hell, why even bother conceding at all? It's a pointless gesture that doesn't formalize anything. Especially after Hillary blatantly stated in 2020 that Biden should not concede at all if he was behind Trump.
I've always thought the concession ritual was silly. Just wait until everything is counted and done. Of course that shouldn't take 2 weeks, but that's another issue.
Keep litigating up to the time the Electoral vote is certified.
Trump's mistake was continuing to press the issue when time expired.
Trump’s mistake was continuing to press the issue when time expired.
Bingo. He should have taken the cue from 2000 and conceded after all the legal avenues had been exhausted. Him trying to get Pence to delay the count in order to continue contesting the result might have made sense to him, but realistically it was done when the Supreme Court said it was done. But that's not what happened.
I agree with this. The Donald took it 2 steps too far. Once SCOTUS ruled, that should have been it. Is that criminal, going 2 steps too far? You can make a good argument either way.
Democrats 2016 insurrection was just smaller "The states were counted, but three protestors started yelling from the visitors’ gallery of the chamber. "
1:09 P.M. ET: Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts rose to object to the certificate from Alabama.
“The electors were not lawfully certified, especially given the confirmed and illegal activities engaged by the government of Russia,” McGovern said.
Biden denied McGovern on the grounds that he didn’t have a senator’s signature on his written objection.
1:14 P.M.: Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland rose to object to 10 of Florida’s 29 electoral votes.
“They violated Florida’s prohibition against dual office holders,” Raskin said.
Again, despite the fact that Raskin pointed out that he had his objection in writing, he failed to get a senator’s signature.
1:15 P.M.: No sooner had the Florida question been settled than its neighbor to the north was the subject of another objection, when Washington’s Rep. Pramila Jayapal objected to Georgia’s vote certificate.
“It is over,” Biden told the congresswoman.
1:21 P.M.: Rep. Barbara Lee of California brought up voting machines and Russian hacking when she objected following the counting of Michigan’s votes.
“People are horrified by the overwhelming evidence of Russian interference in our election,” Lee said.
Once again, her objection was denied for the lack of a senator’s signature. They also turned off her microphone.
1:23 P.M.: After New York’s tally was read, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas stood up to object.
“I object on the massive voter suppression that included –” Jackson Lee began.
“The debate is not in order,” Biden interrupted. Again, the congresswoman lacked a senator’s signature.
1:28 P.M.: Arizona’s Rep. Raul Grijalva rose to object after North Carolina’s tally. He tried to object on violations of the Voting Rights Act, but Biden shut him down.
As you may have guessed, he didn’t have the signature of a senator.
Once he gave up, Jackson Lee tagged him out and tried to object to the votes herself. They cut off her microphone, too.
“There is no debate. There is no debate. There is no debate,” a visibly agitated Biden said as he gaveled.
1:31 PM: Jackson Lee made another appearance minutes later after South Carolina’s certification.
“There is no debate in the joint session,” Biden said, shutting her down once more.
1:36 PM: Biden must have thought, after five minutes of peace and getting through the state of West Virginia, that the House members might observe the rules. Lee wasn’t even able to make it through her objection before Biden said, “There is no debate.”
They cut off her microphone again.
1:37 PM: Wisconsin’s votes had been read. With just Wyoming to go, the finish line was in reach.
Jackson Lee once again tried to make an objection on the grounds of Russian interference in the election.
“The objection cannot be received,” Biden said.
1:38 PM: The final state’s votes had been read. Then entered California Rep. Maxine Waters.
Taking a play from her own book – she objected to the certification of George W. Bush’s 2000 election – Waters admitted that she didn’t have a senator’s signature on her objection.
“I wish to ask: Is there one United States senator who will join me in this letter of objection?” Waters asked. Through House Speaker Paul Ryan’s chuckle and boos from the rest of the chamber, it was clear that there was not.
1:40 PM: The states were counted, but three protestors started yelling from the visitors’ gallery of the chamber. At least one of them was reciting the Constitution as he was taken away by security.
"I'll take "really stupid attempts at equivalence" for $100"
Poor shrike.
Now that is a sore, sore bum.
So you’re saying it’s (D)ifferent. Got it.
…He steered the venerable think tank away from some of its longtime conservative principles to court Donald Trump,
So, no principles.
I’d like some sort of evidence for this claim, personally.
you make a tech device, called 'friend'...it signals the opposite: it communicates your alone-ness
True...but it also won't ask for help moving.
YOU MUST LITERALLY CARRY IT AROUND YOUR NECK. YOUR ENTIRE PART OF THE RELATIONSHIP IS TO HELP IT MOVE.
Well yeah but no Ikea furniture that they want to keep for it to only break apart once you get it to the new house.
Does it fit easily up the stairwell? That’s what matters.
Meanwhile in Paris...
Two female boxers at the Paris Olympics who were disqualified at the 2023 world championships after being judged to have failed gender eligibility tests have complied with all rules to fight at the games, the IOC said Monday.
One of them knocked the taste out of her opponent's mouth and nearly her headgear off in the first minute of the fight, causing the (actual) woman to drop out and cry.
What a brave new world we have
Would have linked the video, but all the ones on youtube are either clips of clips or specifically copyright striked by the olympics. Weird they dont want anyone seeing it...
When I grew up, dudes weren’t supposed to hit girls.
Johnathan majors is going to be the next female boxing champion!
This is the world Chemjeff has longed for.
Chemjeff World: where the men are women; they pummel women too; and the kids are nervous.
When I grew up, dudes weren't supposed to be girls.
To paraphrase Drago in Rocky IV: “If she dies, she dies.”
Progressive theory gets undermined by the results of practical application.
https://twitter.com/fairplaywomen/status/1818961378780094862
There is a possibility that the 'women's' final will be between two men.
In blue body paint with bare testicles?
Kids shouldn't watch boxing. So testicles will be inside the shorts.
In the not too distant future, sports will be all men.
Full circle.
Title IX being created and enforced to actually offer scholarships and resources to really open the door for womens NCAA, which no one really wanted to watch or invest money into, to being forcibly (attempted) expanded to include men who think they are women who are stomping metaphorical (sometimes literal) mudholes in the women they are competing against, seems to be a nice little intra-country microcosm of the global situation.
Can't we just cover the man, quoting what he says, without losing our minds?
That would go against orders.
ThThat might be possible if the 21st Century journalists saw their role as being disinterested news reporters instead of left wing activists pushing the Democrats to victory.
Are you saying our elites wasted the past three decades destroying their emotional resilience and designing a society where any disagreeable person or idea is grounds for complete mental breakdown?
Words and ideas are dangerous.
He appeared to be trying to make the case that Harris code-switching, to appeal to black voters in speeches, is disingenuous. (Welcome to politics!) But it came off more as rude to biracial people, as if they need to pick an identity group.
She did pick an identity group; Indian. Then chose another one when it suited her. I don't remember her ever claiming to be a proud "biracial".
I think this is a silly and stupid distraction that Trump will never win on. Harris went to a traditionally black college, and a black sorority. I guarantee you that if you look back at press from the past, you will find her black heritage mentioned.
Yes, while she was in northern California, her staff and the press played up her Indian heritage, in an attempt to ingratiate herself with the heavy populations there. But that is different from being "only" Indian.
Think about what Trump needs to do for this to stick- he needs to basically prove a negative- that there was no press about Harris's blackness back in the day. This is the fucking internet. There is no way he is successful at that aim.
On the other hand, this is classic Trump. Everyone is convinced that this is the unraveling of the candidate every single time he says shit like this. And it never is.
They’re homing in on that one line because they want to gloss over the fact that he walked into an extremely hostile environment, gave no fucks about it, and Harris couldn’t even be bothered to show up to hit the nerf balls they would toss to her. He even pointed out that he wasn’t staying an extra 30 minutes to accommodate them because they were 30 minutes late and he as ready to go.
Trump’s never been shy about engaging with the press, even when he knows they don’t like him. Back in 2016, one of the reporters assigned to cover him talked about what a pain in the ass it was to get any time with Hillary, even though she was hungry to get her as much positive press as possible, while Trump would sit down with her for interviews just about any time she asked, even though they didn’t like each other.
Then there was the time they told him about Ginsberg passing. He could have brushed them off, but stayed for a moment to make a statement about what a great career she had and its impact.
The press always ends up in a bind because they know they can’t accuse Trump of ever ducking them, but they also know that the more they engage with him, the more popular he gets because ultimately, he's an entertainer who knows how to work a crowd.
The Reasonistas couldn't hide their delight when Trump got booed at the Libertarian clownshow. Trump shrugged it off. Biden challenges him to an early debate demanding he accept their rules. Trump says sure. Anywhere, anytime, any rules you want. Compare that with basement Joe and the completely scripted Kamala. A significant chunk of the electorate actually like a politician who's willing to tell them what he really thinks.
But our media is now completely dedicated to narratives, and further, only to approved narratives crafted by the DNC-media complex. And in their bubble, everyone is either a fellow believer or a heretic to be vanquished.
The Reasonistas couldn’t hide their delight when Trump got booed at the Libertarian clownshow. Trump shrugged it off.
And again, at least he showed up (and RFK Jr., also, to his credit). He didn't have to waste his time appealing to voters of a niche party that the mainstream tends to treat as a joke, but he did it anyway.
Harris has gone 11 days without adversarial questions as the press acts like she is willy brown and they want a job.
It's really fucking wild that the Dems are about to nominate a candidate who's never won a single delegate, much less a primary, after unceremonially forcing Grandpa to finally give up his car keys. A normal press would be going, "Hey, why is she the presumptive nominee when she hasn't even been vetted by the party's own voters?" But they're Democrats, and Harris is a Democrat, so they don't think anything of it. Whomever the party says is the nominee, is the nominee.
Sometimes you have to be undemocratic to protect democracy. Even Maduro in Venezuela understands this. Been hilarious watching him use the exact same election game plan dems did to justify the election in 2020. Arresting protestors, not showing all election data, etc.
Being generous, I'd say it runs under the presumption that she was vetted before 2020 and was proven a good caretaker of grandpa's estate. If that was actually the case, then it would be logical that she's the best suited and positioned to take over grandpa's estate after he dies. The problem, of course, is that she is (in a more charitable metaphor) the young gold-digging wife of the rich man. She knows nothing about how anything works and is only expected to look pretty and say little
Obviously, it would look bad if they actually threw the nomination at the convention open to all comers, as it would be a confirmation that they didn't trust Harris to step in. But it still says something that she's an appointed nominee without even a scintilla of debate about it. That's one of the rare times the BLM doofs had a good point.
Do you know what is even wilder....Team D politicos are convinced she will easily win, and retain the Senate.
He doesn't need to prove a negative, all he needs to do is reinforce that she isn't really one of them with their concerns or best interests at heart. Between her long history of playing up the Indian side plus her tossing black men on prison for shit she did then cackling about it along with a whole lot of nothing else it might be a valid tactic to keep people from voting for her if not for him.
And if he could ever stop rambling and just get to the inevitable fucking conclusion of the thought he starts, he would be fine.
"I don't know, is she Indian or is she black? Who cares? Quit dividing us.
American, all by itself, is sufficient. Americans made this country great. We need to unite as just plain Americans to make it great again."
Right, because the libertarians sure know about being persuasive and Trump doesn't...
Lol
“American, all by itself, is sufficient.”
You realize they’d still react the same way if he said this, right?
Yes. Making it easy to point out that they value diversity over unity.
Just like the Native American Elizabeth Warren, race is now as flexible as sexuality and gender are these days
And to those people, race and gender is The Most Important Thing. Funny coincidence.
What Trump did was to clearly out the racists.
Everyone focused on the race aspect is a racist.
He was pointing out that Kween Kamala is also the queen of flip flops.
The point is political, not racial.
"...which seems to really be blowing Trump's mind..."
Trump broke a lot of people, Liz included.
'Harris is biracial, born to an Indian mother and a Jamaican father'
I did not know that "Jamaican" is a race. Did all the official forms get this update?
Her father apparently is mixed, with his ancestors being slave owners in Jamaica.
The group Donald Harris’s from average 3/4 white, 1/4 black, with no pure African genetics entering since slavery in Jamaica ended.
Kamala can say she has some African ancestry, but she can’t claim she is an American black, because she isn’t (And neither was Obama).
You never say anything racist. Where are you getting this stupid shit from?
I've spent hours trying to find anything to back up you and gayer's obviously same source's assertion. The only thing close is some 2019 quote from dnesh D'Souza claiming an obvious black Christina Brown is 100% Irish.
What are your sources on the ethnicity of his other 3 grand parents? Or his "group"?
You obviously didn’t even spend thirty seconds, you lying fuck.
Donald comes from people who have been known as mixed race “Maroons” and in his case “Quadroons” for generations (like the Metis I’m a part of), and have long segregated themselves from pure African ancestry. The Maroons and Quadroons are an ethnicity unto themselves.
As Wikipedia explains: “By the late eighteenth century, most free people of color in Saint-Domingue were native born and part of colored families that had been free for generations.”
So when we say a quarter African ancestry we’re not talking about a single grandparent you “one-drop” pushing retarded DNC shill. Donald Harris’s people have been quarter “black” for dozens of generations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamaican_Maroons#The_Maroons_and_runaway_communities_in_the_Blue_Mountains
https://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/news/20170801/arnold-bertram-jamaicas-black-and-coloured-slave-owners
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4287265
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_people_of_color#Caribbean
https://brill.com/view/journals/nwig/94/3-4/article-p273_3.xml?language=en
Fucking sockpuppeting moron.
You retarded dipshit.
Donald calls himself a maroon?
Is that the next bombshell from the trump camp?
Maroons are the native, black, European hybrids. Not 3/4 european blacks.
I've been here with you for over ten years you mendacious fuck.
You're losing it.
I can't wait to taunt you with your own name when honky maroon Harris wins because of morons like yourself.
Nardz and misek are more honest than you.
Seems her father is mostly Irish descended from a notorious slave owner. When he couldn't import Africans anymore thanks to the UK embargos he started importing Irish indentured servants who were reportedly treated the same as slaves. I'm not interested in blaming anyone for the sins of the father but it's the leftists that insist that race is a significant reason to vote for this person. They started the conversation now they're pissed off when anyone responds.
So does Kammy qualify for reparations or not?
She has to pay herself.
Apparently early-mid 1960s California recognized it. Kamala's mother saying "Caucasian" was politically/legally correct at the time and "scientifically correct" to this day.
I believe her birth certificate says Caucasian and Jamaican of unspecified race.
I remember the Asians and the Blacks fighting over Tiger Woods back in the day.
First Asian to win the open!!!
NO!!! First black to win the open!!!
No one said first Biracial to win.
Just as funny now as it was then.
Just have a racial draft.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z3wUD3AZg4
Speaking of Dave Chappell, he would have been a brilliant VP pick for Trump.
If I remember correctly, the Asians chose the Wutang Clan as their pick, the blacks got Tiger in the draft.
Cablanasian.
"Others expressed concerns that Trump would be given a platform to make false claims…”
Unlike, say, the platform that had been given to Kamila Harris to make false claims about Biden not suffering from cognitive decline and about those claiming otherwise being partisan liars. Is there no concern that she will continue making such blatantly false claims?
Others expressed concerns that Trump would be given a platform to make false claims…
Only the chosen may speak.
And only if they say what I want to hear.
“Is there no concern that she will continue making such blatantly false claims?”
Its (D)ifferent. Just ask Jeff and sarc.
Has Kamala made a single false claim? Or are you just fucking lying again?
“Has Kamala made a single false claim?”
Is this tulpa again, trying to make you look like an idiot, or did you actually type this?
It’s almost Friday. I’m going with shitfaced. Let’s see how he does the rest of the day before we decide for certain, though.
Oh cute. Someone who I have on mute is so desperate for my attention that they're impersonating me, and likely talking to themselves too. I wonder how many people they'll fool.
Ahh, so it IS Tulpa. I shouldn't have been fooled, the real sarc would never say something so asinine.
I do not share your optimism.
the real sarc would never say something so asinine.
You obviously don't know the real sarc then. He's kind of a miracle of nature.
Yes, she has.
Just a few for the DNC operatives defending her.
"JDVance endorses Project 2025"
"After Roe was dismantled, extremists evoked a law from 1849 to stop abortion” in Wisconsin.
"There are polls that also say I have great approval ratings."
Says she "sued Exxon Mobil" as California attorney general.
"The majority of women are minimum wage workers."
Lol. While fake, still accurate. Why nobody can tell.
Especially after that shitshow yesterday.
While fake, still accurate.
"Fake but accurate". Where have I heard that before? Hmm...
Leftists have no sense of humor.
OF course it was a member of "the press".
Has Kamala made a single false claim?
Yes. Hundred’s. That even a retard like you and a weasel like Lying Jeffy won’t even be able to deny.
But before I start posting video clips of them, once they are posted will you apologize for being stupid, or will you refuse to watch them, call me a creepy stalker again, and then run away?
I will post them regardless, but I just want you to tell us what tactic you’re planning to use first.
Talking to yourself I see.
You already forgot you and Jeff yesterday I see.
Come on, Sarckles. Which one will it be? I'm guessing you'll either chimp out and scream "STALKER!" or ghost, but why don't you give us a hint.
Kamila Harris to make false claims about Biden not suffering from cognitive decline
Hell, that wasn't even the first lie she told about him. Remember the debates where she claimed he hadn't supported busing and wanted to keep her segregated from white kids?
Or how her office hadn't locked away 1900 black men on marijuana charges when she was DA.
This is a pretty silly argument. Even for you. It's obvious that Trump's comments are with regard to Harris's political identity. Think about it this way - say Barack Obama were to start talking about himself as a white man and insisting the Democrats needed to listen to him because they needed a white man's perspective on the issues. I think we can agree that that would be a little...well...weird (in the popular parlance). Trump is clearly making the same accusation toward Harris. Now, it's perfectly reasonable to question that accusation. And my impression is that was the tack the interviewer was trying to take. But, it's just ridiculous to suggest that he doesn't understand Harris is bi-racial.
One correction: tri-racial (at least)
Predominately Caucasian ancestry.
Jamaican quadroons are 3/4 European and Brahmin South Indians are 34% Bronze Age European Corded Ware via Sintashta and the Andronovo Horizon, so yeah, she has more European ancestry than Dravidian or African.
So fucking stupid.
You Canadians need to stay in your fucking lane. Where is your source on her genealogy? All 4 of Donald's grandparents? 3 Irishmen and one African.
You are a faggot ML. Come to Detroit.
Indians are 100% indo-european, so why even waste your time with that one.
And you're trying to pretend you know her Tamil parentage?
You're fucking scum.
'Journalists took to X to express their dismay at Trump even being invited to speak onstage at the NABJ conference, never mind the fact that the conference customarily invites candidates running for president to speak, so it would be out of step with tradition if Trump were randomly excluded.'
Get woke, Liz.
First of all, tradition is by definition anti-progressive (really). And we now understand that tradition is always motivated by, and supportive of, patriarchal white privilege and institutional racism.
Second, did you miss the campus wars, fought by brave if sensitive snowflakes, to achieve a protective state where mean people, words, and ideas are banished?
Third, how dare you suggest that equality is more important than equity? Thousands of woman-years of academic work on critical theory and intersectionality prove that the only just system is one where white men have to sit on the floor in the corner without speaking.
Journalists took to X to express their..
Thank you for finally dropping the “formerly Twitter” crap.
^100%!
'What's your PIN number?', right?
But it came off more as rude to biracial people, as if they need to pick an identity group.
psst: both sides are neck-deep into the identity politics game now, so of course Trump is going to take a cheap shot at KamKam over identitarian reasons
Boy, it's really a shame that Joe just up and got dementia out of nowhere a month ago, huh?
But watching Jeff flounder about with his new "both sides bad" schtick is entertaning.
It means his team is losing so he has to pretend to not be a leftist.
New? I have always rejected both sides. You are just upset that I didn't reject both sides equally.
Ha! You are correct, promoting Marxism is rejecting both sides unequally.
Not just Marxism, but also Fascism in a Keynesian globalist skin suit, so he really is "both sides".
LOL. Fortunately the Democrats, finally getting to grips with reality, persuaded Biden one way or another to step down as a candidate. Which is what should happen when you accept that your potential candidate is not fit for the position, right?
I mean, you're surely not going to claim that Biden should nonetheless have continued as a candidate.
Persuaded is a weird way to describe threatening.
Those options imply dealing with a sentient being. I see the DNC action as abandoning one meat puppet so they could hype another.
“finally getting to grips with reality,”
You mean they realized nobody could believe their lies anymore, except maybe you and your ilk.
“I mean, you’re surely not going to claim that Biden should nonetheless have continued as a candidate.”
No more a puppet that Kamala will be.
I love how you give the Dems the most charitable spin to what happened with Biden stepping down. They just came to grips with reality. So they weren't lying about Biden's obvious cognitive decline before, as they didn't and couldn't have realized it before the debate.
Which is what should happen when you accept that your potential candidate is not fit for the position, right?
He's not mentally capable to be tried for crimes, and he's not fit to run for re-election. But he's totally fine to finish his term.
Democrats did it first, so that makes it ok.
*yawn*
Please. It fucking happens all the time. Halle Berry marinates in being a black woman, even though she was raised entirely by her white mother and her dad was a violently abusive asshole. Colin Kaepernick was the product of a mixed-race coupling and was raised by white stepparents (indeed, he's never even met his birth parents), but shoved all that aside to LARP as a black revolutionary. Jordan Peele was also raised entirely by his white mother, and even married a white woman, but his entire film oeuvre consists of complaining how the biggest problem with white people is racism.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with pointing out that Kamala isn't any different.
Also immediately she and her campaign made this another identity politics race game. First stop was to an all black sorority. First campaign rally is a twerk fest with Megan Thee (barf) Stallion. All the things are about her being a historic first black woman.
I dont personally think itll win any votes, more likely to make the people that clutch their pearls clutch them harder, and all the people online who were cringing at her little "Im out here in these streets" videos, many of them black, will laugh because he's saying the thing out loud everyone thinks and knows.
Her dad is like 1/4 Jamaican, her parents are far left Berkley professors and she spent a lot of time growing up in Canada. When I have a solid summer tan I have 10x the street cred Kamala Harris does. If she was ever in the room with a kid from the inner city (that she didnt already lock up) without a camera she would probably be bothered to talk to them at all if no shoo them away with haste.
She's a poser, a fake, she's not "authentically black" as the kids would say if she was speaking anything other than party orthodox opinions. Trump is just saying what everyone can see plain as day. Again, probably not going to win any votes from this, but the people up in arms werent ever pulling the lever for Trump anyways
It's not a bid to gain votes, it's a play to diminish enthusiasm.
And it's a tension worth exploiting.
I was surprised to discover the level of divide that exists regarding Kamala on black twitter.
“black twitter.”
HOW DARE YOU!
—Liz
It's a play to make people like other me and crack rocks sound like 60s segregationist even if they're the least racist people in the world.
It looks like it's going to work. Trump is going to get the lowest share of the black vote since they've kept track if they can keep republicans talking about European Donald Harris' slaveholding family. If they can somehow trick Trump or Vance into making this claim, it'll dominate the news cycle for weeks.
Fuck off, Buttplug. You don't get to play non-racist concern troll here.
Especially with your posting history.
"It’s a play to make people like other me and crack rocks sound like 60s segregationist even if they’re the least racist people in the world."
The least racist people in the world, that would refer to anyone that dares disagree with the dem orthodoxy while having black skin as "lawn jockeys"?
Your concern troll is noted
So, like sarcasmic said, "Democrats did it first, so that makes it ok."
Yup.
You and Sarc need some new material.
"If you fight your enemies, they win."
at the annual convention for the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ).
I am not sure which shows less political savvy, stepping into the obvious trap or thinking he can grab the bait without ending up dangling by one leg looking like an idiot.
The proper course is to refuse to engage about race. Make everything about "the People of the United States of America".
https://x.com/feelsdesperate/status/1818790967039692811?t=M7svYQCC7dK8QpThlTw9Qg&s=19
Lmao this belongs in a museum.
No one is allowed to have real political interests.
The only thing allowed is performative identity narcissism.
Of course there are black jobs - they are the jobs black people have.
And they’re disproportionately threatened by immigrant labor.
"@axios
Trump says immigrants are taking "Black jobs."
Reality check: There are no Black jobs, because there is not any kind of racial requirement for employment. Black people have all kinds of jobs from vice president to hedge fund bro to journalist and so on."
Zero capacity to think about anyone but themselves
An illegal immigrant from Ecuador isn’t going to be competition for an HR job or corporate board spot.
He’s going to go into disproportionately black high paying blue collar industries like construction and drive wages down.
Wonder if axios knows dems have created minority owned business loans.
https://x.com/FischerKing64/status/1818853277083353200?t=XQcIMsXHRvtqibKVD6LSgw&s=19
Trump with the black journalists. Masterful performance. When he’s gone, we will not have another GOP candidate who can walk into a hostile environment and hold his own like that again - probably for our lifetimes. Having balls matters. Link in next tweet.
When he’s gone, we will not have another GOP candidate who can walk into a hostile environment and hold his own like that again – probably for our lifetimes.
The center-right forgets that one of the reasons Reagan was actually as popular as he became was because he didn’t have a problem bantering with the press and showing them up. He relied on humor while Trump is a pit bull, but the appeal lies in the fact that neither showed these scumbags a scintilla of fear. It was also a big reason Gingrich was so hated in the 90s, because he wasn't a pushover for the press like Bush had been. The press didn't like Bush, but they knew the Dems could bust on him all they wanted and he wouldn't be able to come up with any kind of effective response. Yankee GOPers were always braver against foreign adversaries than they ever were against their domestic ones.
The center right is dickless controlled "opposition"
Sarc missed when those guys were in charge.
'Biden Administration Pushes Airlines to Seat Kids Next to Parents at No Extra Cost'
Who says Joe does not has what it takes to tackle the Most Important Issues of our times?
If he can beat shrinkflation he can beat this too.
Same with the fatties.
Like that cow JD Vance, amirite crackrocks?
Fuck off Buttplug, you fucking cone wearing klansman.
“Stop bringing kids on airplanes” would be a better policy.
Who says Joe does not has what it takes to tackle the Most Important Issues of our times?
Kinda difficult to sniff your daughter's hair if she's on the other side of the plane.
https://x.com/OGRolandRat/status/1818821638084870469?t=KmjnXbTg6j36O80gMMCe3A&s=19
There is definite two-tier policing in Britain. The dogs were not set on BLM in 2020 and neither were they set on rioters in Leeds. But if the rioters are white and working class, FEED THEM TO THE DOGS.
Modern face of totalitarianism looks like this.
[Link]
But it came off more as rude to biracial people, as if they need to pick an identity group.
DJT was pointing out that that's precisely what Kamala does, depending on her audience. These intersectional clowns always just jump on what's most convenient to their audience. Kamala herself is Indian in front of an Asian audience, but then switches to Black in front of black audience. But on a normal every day, she's not really either - she's just Kamala Harris.
It's only when they feel like they have something to gain, do they lean into this racial identity - which, regardless of their ethnic makeup, is always just a skinsuit they put on and take off when it's beneficial. Kamala isn't black OR indian. She's an American. She just wears racial costumes that she can get away with wearing.
If she has any italian blood in her, I fully expect her to walk into Little Italy shouting, "Hey paisanos! It's a-me, Kamala-o!"
Because that's what these kinds of scumbags do.
Being a chameleon is what these establishment Dems do as naturally as they breathe. Remember Hillary and her claiming how much of a fan she always was of the Cubs, or the Yankees, depending on who she was talking to? It's why they always sound so ridiculous, like Kamala claiming she smoked weed while listening to Tupac, long before he'd actually released his first album.
"Remember Hillary..."
Talking to that crowd with the worst imitation of a southern accent Ive heard in some time
Or telling a black interviewer that she don't go anywhere without her havin' some hawt sauwce in her purse!
Pepperidge farms remembers
At least Hillary lived in Arkansas and may, may have adapted a bit of it.
It would have been really difficult to be around Bill all the time with that Roscoe P. Coltrane accent of his and not at least imitate it after a while. But we also saw how fast she dropped it when he became a national political figure. She wanted to be seen as the Beltway feminist ballbuster, even when Bill was running around on her with multiple women all the way through his presidency (and probably even beyond).
While I do think there is legitimate affection between them, because they wouldn’t have stayed married this long otherwise, it’s obvious there was a significant transactional aspect to their coupling that manifested itself as Bill became more prominent in the party.
This is not an Elisabeth Warren situation.
Attacking Harris on her race seems petty and childish.
Harris and her acolytes making race (and race fluidity) a virtue is petty and childish.
So? Then don't be like them.
If I wanted identity politics front and center I would vote for a dem.
It's not? She is using a miniscule of blackness & acting like she is Pam Grier or something.
I'm more black than her, and I can get a sunburn in February.
If anything Kamala is worse than Elizabeth Warren. Warren was probably honestly convinced that she was part Cherokee from family lore. My mother told me the same thing and I didn't doubt it until I got a DNA test. Warren did cynically exploit this drop of blood claim for personal gain but after watching her humiliating public DNA test I think she probably believed she would be vindicated. Kamala only needs to look back a single generation to know her ethnic heritage and she has shamelessly profited by shape shifting to suit any audience she needs to grift off. Nobody is attacking her biracial heredity. Nobody cares. She's being attacked for her hypocrisy.
^accurate
"Nononono, you hate her because she is gay" - JeffSarc.
So I’m 1/4 Irish, 1/4 Russian Jew, and 1/2 Greek. Which one should I be today? I’ve had to lay off the booze, so Irish is out.
If you're were 1/1024th black, you'd be Megan Markle and you'd have a podcast about how racist everything is.
Well you are obviously a victim of antisemitism so reparations are due. Or maybe not considering your role as an evil colonist. And I share with you the drunken wife beater bloodline and there's no question we got fucked. Some of our people actually ended up as slaves on Kamala's great great grandfather's plantation in Jamaica. But he was Irish too so no harm no foul. And I lived with a Greek girl many years ago. The saganaki and grape leaves were fabulous. Opa. And I hear you guys invented democracy or something. Good on you. And those Orthodox churches are fucking insane. Life size bloody Jesus everywhere you look. She also introduced me to what we used to call Greek Culture. Not my personal preference but I'm all about multiculturalism.
and Russian
Whichever one gets you laid.
97 days until the election.
The most important election of our lifetime!
Seems like we just had the most important presidential debate of our lifetime and nobody remembers.
Especially Joe.
Historically the VP pick doesn't matter? The late John McCain and George McGovern might disagree. The reality is the VP is picked for bringing something to the ticket. In 2016, Mike Pence brought a appearance of normality and competence to the ticket. Joe Biden brought foreign affairs experience to President Obama's ticket. But no matter what a VP pick brings, Presidential candidates always say that they were picked because of their ability to step in to the Presidency. Trump doesn't understand politics 101. And think about JD Vance. I not sure anyone has looked down on a vice-presidential pick so much as FDR looked down on Harry Truman.
I thought at first Vance may bring some intellectual weight to the ticket since he has written a widely praised book, Yale law credentials, etc. But it seems all he does is double down on the culture war stuff.
Have you read his full speeches or just what media pushes?
You need to read something other than TeenReason coverage. Vance is a very smart guy. A deep thinker. You can disagree with his conclusions but to pass him off as a culture warrior reveals only your own laziness.
I wouldn't expect him to be any different than how he was as a Senate candidate. I do think he doesn't have the same level of policy understanding as DeSantis, which is honestly why I was surprised he decided to run as VP. I thought he'd be better served waiting until a second Senate term before deciding whether to make the leap to a bigger stage.
Historically the VP pick doesn’t matter? The late John McCain and George McGovern might disagree.
Funny, having a relative neophyte like Quayle didn't seem to have affected Bush's candidacy any.
Nobody gave a shit about McGovern's VP pick; he got rejected because he was a rad-left ding-dong during a period where that ideology wasn't the cultural status quo. No one born after 1975 even knows who was his VP candidate was without an internet search.
As for McCain, 1) he already had an steep hill to climb to even have a shot at winning after 8 years of Dubya, 2) he was a warmongering piece of shit that probably would have started something with Iran for shits and giggles, 3) he already had a piss-poor reputation with GOP voters for pandering to the press with that "Maverick" nonsense, and 4) the biggest bump he ever got in the polls was after Palin gave that populist speech at the RNC.
McCain nuked his campaign with that extremely stupid stunt where he pulled that performative "suspension" to go back and grandstand about TARP, while ultimately voting for it. Meanwhile, Obama didn't have to do anything except sit back and laugh, because his opponent did all the work of destroying himself.
George McGovern chose Thomas Eagleton to be his VP only to have that blow up when Eagleton's history of depression was reported. Did it cost McGovern the election? No, it was probably lost anyway but it did hurt the ticket.
McGovern's political positions cost McGovern the election. No one gave a squirt of piss for Eagleton.
I am going on the assumption that you were not a round for the 1972 election. The other case is that your memory is failing.
The only thing that the Eagleton situation showed was that the Dems didn't vet his candidate enough. But McGovern didn't need any help losing that election any more than McCain did.
I was. McGovern lost by the biggest margin ever, winning only Massachusetts and DC (Go figure). You can hardly blame that on a VP choice.
The media ripped up Eagleton and Quail even though neither one was particularly bad for the republic. Quail was portrayed as an idiot but he was actually a very smart guy. They took down Eagleton because he had been treated for depression something that easily half of all Democrats have done. The same thing is playing out with Vance right now. And Reason of course plays along. When Kamala picks her VP you can bet it will be a completely different story.
"Funny, having a relative neophyte like Quayle didn’t seem to have affected Bush’s candidacy any."
You gotta be kidding. Bush senior was seen as a tongue tied bungler until he unveiled Quayle, who immediately took all the media heat and derision, leaving Bush to assume the role as the sober minded statesman.
I'm not kidding at all. Bush wasn't doing anything other than running for Reagan's third term and he had an effective campaign team during a time when Massachusetts still had the stink of being a rad-left outpost in a relatively sane country.
Him nominating Quayle was baffling to the media, but it was mainly because he didn't need someone with a lot of political experience as a running mate, as he already knew where the skeletons were buried through his spook connections. Quayle being a relative neophyte was a very deliberate decision to simply have someone who wouldn't need to be asked to do much.
"Quayle being a relative neophyte was a very deliberate decision to simply have someone who wouldn’t need to be asked to do much."
You're not disputing anything I wrote. Quayle served as a laughing stock, diverting attention away from a bumbler who was uncomfortable on the stump.
(Quayle may have also served to shore up the Agnostic (ie Anglican) Bush's support among Christians, who either didn't see Quayle as a laughing stock, or just weren't in on the joke.)
You’re not disputing anything I wrote. Quayle served as a laughing stock, diverting attention away from a bumbler who was uncomfortable on the stump.
Bush was hardly uncomfortable on the stump. And I realize your kind likes to equate "hokey" with "bumbling" (one of the mistakes you made during Reagan's term as well), but that wasn't the case either.
Quayle got picked because he wasn't going to be a potential rival to Bush like Bush was to Reagan. Quayle mainly became a laughingstock because he was a Republican and the press are Democrats. That's all there was to it.
"Bush was hardly uncomfortable on the stump."
He never struck me as someone who could work a room, not surprising for someone whose political career was slim to begin with and served mostly in bureaucratic roles. Perhaps you think he was an accomplished campaigner, but maybe you're thinking of George W. Bush, his son, who was much more comfortable performing in front of a crowd. Bush Sr. is more of a droning Jeb-like bore, if you ask me. He did well to choose Quayle to give the media something juicy to talk about and leave him alone.
"Quayle mainly became a laughingstock because he was a Republican and the press are Democrats. "
Quayle was a national laughingstock. Not just with the press. With anyone who heard his priceless gaffes. Go back and refresh your memory. They far outshine anything by Bush or Biden, other noted verbal bumblers.
misconstrueman, how unfortunate you weren't with Wasmail earlier this week, in Tehran.
Isn't it though. You'll have to do better than that if you want to rid yourself of me.
Quayle was a national laughingstock. Not just with the press. With anyone who heard his priceless gaffes.
No, that was mainly the press establishing a narrative. It didn't have anything to do with reality.
"No, that was mainly the press establishing a narrative. "
You overestimate the role of the press. Like Trump. You ignore the more important influencer: TV and Hollywood. Think SNL or Johnny Carson. They made millions off lampooning politicians like Quayle and had audiences millions more. That translates into influence and the ability to create a narrative. The press are reporting how those influences are manifested within the narrative framework the popular culture has generated. This emphasis on the press as some evil cabal is wrong headed. It's popular culture that's in the driver's seat here. Any populist worthy of the name should welcome that.
The press was more powerful a century ago. There were a lot more papers, they were cheap, and had a huge audience. The Bolsheviks spent whatever money they raised on producing newspapers and smuggling them into Russia. Stalin was the editor of Pravda before he became supremo. If it's any consolation, I think the days of TV and Hollywood being the voice of the people are coming to an end if not already over. Now it's the internet, and still the Bolsheviks are running the show!
Agreed but that potato spelling clip sure f'ed him in the a.
""Trump doesn’t understand politics 101.""
Probably more so than you give him credit for. He's historically been on the side buying politicians, not as the politician.
Trump knows people are tired of politics so naturally he wouldn't behave as politics 101.
https://x.com/QuetzalPhoenix/status/1819016178934612343?t=dHilMme3thcYbEeiyQl_BQ&s=19
"Multiculturalism works if you just stop being racist"
Is identical to saying
"Rape isn't real if you just stop resisting"
https://x.com/loganclarkhall/status/1818833489690530203?t=o7wJ_D3DtXij0XkvVmfiGg&s=19
you can argue policy until your face turns blue but it all falls flat compared to this.
noblesse oblige. people love him because he loves them.
"Trump publicly thanks the woman who put the chart up on the screen which saved his life on J13
“She saved my life!”"
[Video]
https://x.com/vagrantwires/status/1819001920536952891?t=gn5wqoAtq-7tqZB4ZLv5hA&s=19
Libs: "We're introducing the concept of DEI. If you don't subscribe to DEI that obviously makes you a racist!!!"
Also Libs: "How dare you call us DEI, that obviously makes you a racist!!!"
"@gloria_purvis
Just so y’all know, when you use the term DEI derisively regarding Black people, we see it as code for calling us a racial slur and you might as well be wearing a klan hat. We see you out there. #dogwhistle"
Hey Gloria, if you know what a dog whistle sounds like, that means you're a dog.
Maybe Aesop could write a fable about crying "Racist!"
He did write the one about the farmer bringing the snake into his house. That one certainly has some applicability for the dipshits who refuse to acknowledge all the criminals who enter the country illegally and call out racism against anyone that does.
"it's not clear why Trump made the comments he did at the NABJ conference or how those comments will help him ..."
... and it never will be. Additionally, it never will be clear why Trump made ANY of the comments he has made or will make in the future because he doesn't know himself why he makes the comments he makes. I remember telling my kids when they were little, "You don't have to speak every random thought that pops into your head. Whenever you think you might want to say something out loud, think again and ask yourself why you want to say it and what effect it might have if you do."
And yet somehow, he seems to be doing quite well for himself.
Yeah, somehow it seems to work for him. I still think he could do better if he had just a little more of a filter. But who knows, shit is weird these days.
Harris is biracial, born to an Indian mother and a Jamaican father, which seems to really be blowing Trump's mind. He appeared to be trying to make the case that Harris code-switching, to appeal to black voters in speeches, is disingenuous. (Welcome to politics!) But it came off more as rude to biracial people, as if they need to pick an identity group.
Wrong. Wrong wrong wrong. It is Democrats and the left who embrace the one drop theory. Otherwise Megan Markle wouldn't even be a fucking thing.
I am sure that Megan could still be a fucking thing.
If you ever watched the show Suits you would know she’s definitely a fuckable thing.
Unfortunately for Megan, with all the pretty people casting on Suits she barely qualifies as a 6.
"Historically, the vice president, in terms of the election, does not have any impact," said Trump in response to a question about whether J.D. Vance would be ready for the job on day one. "I mean, virtually no impact…Virtually never has it mattered." It was a real shit show of an appearance
why do you say that after this quote? this quote is a completely accurate assessment of the impact of VP
I guess my pushback on that, was the question being essentially a freebie of "is Vance ready to go on day 1" to which the answer really should be an automatic "yes" as why would you pick anyone that literally cant fulfill the duties you chose them for.
So really, even a combative "no shit, thats a dumb question" would be better than a meandering "well I mean the VP doesnt matter anyways" which makes it seem like he doesnt want to say Vance is ready? Probably just projecting his own ego there, but still it was kind of a dumb answer, even if what he said was completely true
...
It comes off as rude only to those who want to take it that way, because they want to assume the role of "aggressed against". To me it;s just the crystallization of what I and many other people have been seeing for a long time, and we like to laugh at it. If you can't call out others like Harris for their crude appeal, then you're just stuck accepting a defensive posture all the time. She deserves to be made fun of.
What it all boils down to is, people who've followed this race at all have already made up their minds about Trump and Harris. Nobody at this point is going to be convinced to vote for or against Harris because of her self-identification, and nobody's going to be convinced now to vote for or against Trump because of his pointing it out. As those who haven't paid attention to Harris start doing so, they'll fall on one side or the other.
"Nobody at this point is going to be convinced to vote for or against Harris because of her self-identification, and nobody’s going to be convinced now to vote for or against Trump because of his pointing it out."
Completely agree. If you were in the perpetually offended camp, this probably offended. If you're based, you are probably like "ya, exactly everyone can see through this".
If you are on the fence, you likely arent swayable by a somewhat joking observation about obvious race grift
The BBC noted Kamala's "person of colour" status back in 2020, that's why they wanted to know what Black Voters thought:
Serious question: If... *taps on calculator* approx. 50% of Kamala's heritage is Jamaican and therefore a product of the Trans Atlantic slave trade, what percentage of her might actually be white and what would it mean for her 'bi-racial' identity? I guess to be fair, we have White Dudes for Harris to ask.
This is how fucking stupid the media is:
Who keeps talking about her race and gender? WHO KEEPS TALKING ABOUT HER RACE AND GENDER? WHO???!!! WHO?!!!!!!
It's headlines like the above that make me want to print out a tightly spaced, 9pt font list of every headline that touted Kamala's race and gender, roll it into a tube and shove it down a journalist's throat while screaming "What's the frequency, Kenneth?!!"
"Who keeps talking about her race and gender? "
You, for one. You can't seem to help yourself.
Rick James: “If you’re were (sic) 1/1024th black”
Rick James: “approx. 50% of Kamala’s heritage is Jamaican”
Rick James: “I want a split-tail of color”
Rick James: “Why Kamala Harris embraces her biracial roots”
etc. etc. ad nauseum
Do you really think this rabbiting on about Harris’ race or lack of it is helping Trump? Or do you have other motives? Or is it, as I thought, you simply can't help yourself?
Do you really think this rabbiting on about Harris’ race or lack of it is helping Trump?
Ask the media who keep "rabbiting on" about it.
I was asking Rick James why he felt compelled to continue rabbiting on about Harris' race or lack of it. You got a problem with that?
Pointing out the media's fixation on race means you are fixated on her race? Why did you feel compelled to ascribe false motives to his post? Is that just the marxist way?
"Pointing out the media’s fixation on race means you are fixated on her race? "
The article is about Trump's fixation on race. I know this because I read it. Trump is the one obsessing over Harris' race or lack of it and the pair of you only want to make this about the evil media. It's the same pathetic show, over and over and over again.
Never surrender, comrade.
So you don't like the media's obsession with Kamala's race being pointed out. Noted.
"So you don’t like the media’s obsession with Kamala’s race being pointed out. "
Quite the contrary. I love it. I also love Reason's commenter's obsession with Kamala's race. The internet's obsession? Love it! Point me some pointy pointings.
Could this be why Trump's mind is blown? If Kamala can't make up her mind how can the rest of us?
Kamala is absolutely 100% a DEI pick. Biden literally said so when before he picked her, and reiterated it many times.
Same for the supreme court justice KJB. he explicitly promised that the primary requirements for the appointment were to be black, and a woman. All else was secondary. You cant deny these are DEI hires.
Kamala is absolutely 100% a DEI pick. Biden literally said so when before he picked her, and reiterated it many times.
Exactly this. He never said, "I want a candidate whose views align with mine on Gun Control" he said "I want a split-tail of color" and then went from there.
"You cant deny these are DEI hires."
What's wrong with DEI hires? They simply accept the indisputable fact that America is a tribal society and its people more often than not vote along tribal lines.
If you disapprove of certain tribes, that's your problem.
You are a fucking moron.
^
Not my problem.
That would be the exception.
Why do you keep talking about her race and gender?
"Why do you keep talking about her race and gender?"
I'm just following the Dear Leader's lead. You got a problem with that, honkie?
Only until the sweet kiss of the nuke hits you, commie.
So, yes. You do have a problem with that. But, by all means, let's all continue to obsess over Harris' race or lack of it. ID politics for crackers. Short in substance but good for laughs. The black reporters in Trump's audience certainly enjoyed it.
I have a problem with marxists in general, as they're vermin who deserve extermination. Your assumed motives are hardly material here.
"as they’re vermin who deserve extermination"
I disagree. But thanks for sharing.
It's no different than someone declaring they will only consider white men for the position.
"will only consider white men for the position."
I suspect Harris will choose just such a person for her VP candidate. Just as Trump did. You got a problem with that, cracker?
No. But if you don't want someone to be seen as a DEI hire, don't state explicitly that that is what they are. Or don't complain when people point it out.
"But if you don’t want someone to be seen as a DEI hire"
How can Harris possibly avoid that? Her skin is dark and she is female. In short, she's not a white man, ie someone who would never be labelled a DEI hire. Anything falling short of a white man is pretty much automatically a DEI hire.
You're almost there, buddy. Just one more step and you will see why it's terrible for actually qualified people with minority backgrounds.
" it’s terrible for actually qualified people with minority backgrounds."
I agree. Hiring someone white like Vance is terrible for an actually qualified person with a minority background. If Trump had gone DEI for his VP, like a normal American presidential candidate of the 21st century, we wouldn't be in this pickle, would we?
Ugh. Nevermind.
Get ready for at least 3 more months of this garbage. Maybe by then, you'll have figured out why Trump couldn't find an actually qualified person of a minority for his VP pick. Twice.
"Second, the Democratic meltdown over…journalists interviewing Trump"
What Democratic meltdown? Any Democrat I'm aware of is absolutely delighted with Trump's appearance with the black reporters. They might as well have written the script themselves.
Trump is the oldest and most senile candidate in the presidential race, now that Biden has dropped out. Any chance that he'll be replaced? JD is a powerhouse intellect, a decent writer, and budding fascist, so he's the natural Trump replacement. Though how about a black man? Why not a black man? A sexy and successful 100% black man, and not some half assed half black like Obama or Harris.
Why do you keep talking about race and gender?
He can’t seem to help himself.
To quote that white guy, it's wunnerful, wunnerful.
To quote that other white guy, that is where the frog jumps into the water.
and budding fascist
Yes, to marxists, anyone who resists their dumb political theology is a fascist.
What have you got against fascists? Some of them are fine people. My favorite is Hermann Goering. Not exactly a fine person, but a compelling character worthy or a role in a Shakespearean drama, a la John Falstaff, the comic buffoon in some of his historical dramas. Trump is another possibility, the girth and inane verbiage make it a no brainer. Vance is better suited as the smoldering, troubled, couch fucking youth, along the lines of his namesake, James Dean.
“Some of them are fine people. My favorite is Hermann Goering. Not exactly a fine person,”
I too like to act retarded.
"I too like to act retarded."
I know my audience.
Not enough to tell when you’re being sarcastically mocked, apparently.
This whole thing is a sarcastic mockery. High time someone told you.
Marxists also love trying out their "I know you are but what am I" retorts when their dialectic is called out.
It wasn't me who called Trump 'America's Hitler.' That was Vance. Apparently, a one time Marxist scum, now with a new career in the offing, a budding fascist. Just like I told yous.
Thanks for elegantly proving my point.
I like Liz but this is where she reveals her hive mind reaction to reality when forced to confront it. Trump didn't insult any biracial person and he didn't insult Harris for her race. He didn't even bring the subject up. The questioner claimed that Harris is black not that she is biracial. He simply asked what race she wanted to be for the purpose of her candidacy because her campaign is making it an issue. To say that it's irrelevant or insulting is demonstrably false. Trump has been actively campaigning at black churches and barber shops. Is he prohibited from pointing out to his audience that Kamala is not in fact an African American and does not share their experiences? If he speaks to an Asian audience can he point out that lately Kamala claims exclusive fealty to blackness? All of this race shit is stupid but it's not Trump that's bringing it up.
"To say that it’s irrelevant or insulting is demonstrably false."
The candidate's race is absolutely relevant and Trump is right to remind us that Kamala, whatever her race happens to be, is not white.
"Trump has been actively campaigning at black churches and barber shops."
Trump is a fraud. I strongly suspect that many of these 'black churches and barber shops' are mixed race churches and barber shops.
Almost all African Americans are mixed race.
Tell that to Gaear Grimsrud, lying about Trump's supposed visits 'black churches and barber shops.'
I can’t speak for all of them but the one in Detroit he went to is most certainly a black church.
Another conspiracy theory that was definitely wrong until those pesky changing facts reared their ugly head again:
A declassified FBI document confirms longstanding suspicions of the agency's active involvement with Patriot Front for years. With 950 pages of details (heavily redacted), it’s evident that numerous federal assets are deeply embedded within the organization. Interestingly, the group's only documented criminal activity appears to be the illegal placement of posters on public and private property. I'll post links to the FBI's documents (again, not terribly interesting given the fact they've been heavily redacted).
https://x.com/amuse/status/1818686280672120888
Trump had the election locked up.
The democrats then nominated a completely inferior candidate yet tricked trumps supporters into droning on like morons for 3 months.
I wouldn't rule out the Republicans yet. If they're serious about winning, and the campaign is about getting power rather than virtue signalling shits and giggles, they may pull a Bidenesque Coup, and replace Trump with someone younger, someone fit, someone less senile. Otherwise we're in for 100 days of sad and hilarious spectacle.