Attacks on France's Infrastructure Highlight Modern World's Vulnerability
Enjoy your conveniences. But don’t let yourself become helpless in their absence.

Besides never-ending culture war provocations and French officials' inexplicable dedication to persuading the world that the Seine River is not, in fact, an open sewer, the most interesting news out of the 2024 summer Olympics involves repeated attacks on France's infrastructure. Coming so soon after the chaos created by the CrowdStrike fiasco, it underlines the vulnerability of so much of modern society, even amidst heightened security.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Acts of Malice and Incompetence
"France's high-speed rail network was hit by 'malicious acts' including arson attacks that have disrupted the transport system, train operator SNCF said Friday, hours before the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics," France24 reported last week. "The disruptions as the world's eye was turning to Paris were expected to affect a quarter of a million people on Friday and endure through the weekend, and possibly longer, officials said."
French authorities were already beginning to point their fingers at "far-left extremists" who have targeted the rail network in the past when the country's data networks were attacked just days later.
"The French government says multiple telecommunications lines have been hit by acts of vandalism, affecting fiber lines and fixed and mobile phone lines as cities around France are hosting events for the 2024 Paris Olympics," according to Le Monde.
Whether the two attacks were related remains uncertain, though that seems likely. But with 20,000 troops deployed alongside 40,000 police officers for the Olympics, the incidents illustrate how hard it is to secure the modern, interconnected world when bad actors can cause damage by striking from beyond the security perimeters. They also highlight, coming so soon after the CrowdStrike mess, the fragility of the systems on which we depend, whether the threat is from malice or incompetence.
"A bad software update from security software vendor CrowdStrike has paralyzed Windows machines around the world," CSO noted on July 19. "The problem, apparently affecting its Falcon platform, brought down servers at airlines, locked up computers at banks, and hurt healthcare services."
Businesses, organizations, and government agencies are still cleaning up from the aftermath, which is ultimately projected to carry a price tag in the billions of dollars. During the outage, many operations were unable to process credit cards and people were reduced to paying in cash—if they had any. Flights were grounded and medical procedures were canceled as data on servers became unavailable. It was a return to business as done decades in the past for people who, in many cases, no longer have the equipment, physical money, or paper records to adjust accordingly.
When the Modern World Runs Through a Single Cable
Those of us in northern Arizona had a taste of that world in 2015 when somebody—still uncaught, so far as I can tell—cut through the fiber-optic cable that carried the 21st century to our piece of the planet.
"Businesses couldn't process credit card transactions, ATMs didn't function, law enforcement databases were unavailable, and even weather reports were affected in an area stretching from north of Phoenix to Flagstaff, about 100 miles away," CBS News reported at the time.
The outage lasted just hours, providing a relatively harmless warning of what could happen. As Felicia Fonseca wrote for the AP, it "did more than underscore just how dependent modern society has become on high technology. It raised questions about the vulnerability of the nation's Internet infrastructure."
Cables in the tech-heavy San Francisco area have suffered many such attacks.
The CrowdStrike mess suggests data networks are still vulnerable, whether to saboteurs or to sloppy code. For Wired, Caroline Haskins observed that "many businesses were faced with a choice: Go cash-only or close until systems came back online." In Australia's BrokerDaily, Jack Campbell observed that "CrowdStrike outages that affected systems across the world have some questioning digital banking."
Vulnerable Systems in a Hostile World
That's a timely rethink given the attacks on the rail and, particularly, the fiber-optic networks in France—especially given that just days before the Olympics opened, authorities arrested Paris-based Russian chef/FSB spy Kirill Gryaznov for plotting to disrupt the opening ceremonies on behalf of his handlers in Moscow. That he was caught because he got drunk and publicly boasted of his mission would be laughable if much of the world hadn't just been brought to its knees because a computer security company didn't properly test its latest software update.
Adding weight to the arrest is that Russia and the West are engaged in a not-so-quiet sabotage war.
"In April alone a clutch of alleged pro-Russian saboteurs were detained across the continent," The Economist noted May 12. "Germany arrested two German-Russian dual nationals on suspicion of plotting attacks on American military facilities and other targets on behalf of the GRU, Russia's military intelligence agency. Poland arrested a man who was preparing to pass the GRU information on Rzeszow airport, the most important hub for military aid to Ukraine. Britain charged several men over an earlier arson attack in March on a Ukrainian-owned logistics firm in London whose Spanish depot was also targeted."
International tensions aren't exactly cooling down at the moment. And here we are with France suffering two attacks seemingly timed to disrupt the Olympics.
As the CrowdStrike incident and my 2015 experience underline, the U.S. is as exposed as France. Not only are data networks subject to disruption, but the power grid that keeps it all running is beyond rickety. In 2019, The Wall Street Journal's Rebecca Smith emphasized that "despite federal orders to secure the power grid, tens of thousands of substations are still vulnerable to saboteurs."
It's all enough to suggest the modern world is built on a foundation of shifting sand—and some people are actively working to erode its stability. We enjoy the convenience of electricity at the flick of a switch, data at our fingertips, and a connected world. But unless we make backup plans for when those connections go away, whether from mishap, incompetence, or malice, we leave ourselves at risk in a world that offers so much on demand but could take it away in an instant.
Let's enjoy our conveniences. But let's also make sure we're not completely helpless when, inevitably, they become unavailable.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I am not sure there is really any answer to the increasing complexity of the world. For the most part people simply have to endure the fact and accept that at some point in time we will be inconvenienced by our dependency. I live where winter includes an occasional large snowfall. I simple have to accept that there will be a day or two when driving will be limited or unavailable. Most of the outages we see are like the snowfall and last a few days. So, I accept the conveniences and accept the consequences.
"Most of the outages we see are like the snowfall and last a few days."
In France last summer, it wasn't snow, but extreme heat and drought that precipitated power outages. France's nuclear reactors are cooled by water from the rivers. But conditions were so dire, with low levels due to drought, and what water remained proved too hot to cool the reactors. They had to be shut down and electricity had to be imported from Germany, which had abandoned its nuclear program, relying instead on fossil fuels and alternatives.
I live in Florida and we have hurricanes.
Every 5 or 10 years there is a massive one and we are off grid for a week or more.
Battery powered fans with solar rechargeable batteries, canned and freeze dried food, fresh water stored in 10 five gallon cans, rain water catchment system, good neighbors, a walled small development and lots of guns and cases of ammo.
Small sailboats and rowboats and fishing gear along with fins and snorkels and pole spears for trolling, bottom fishing and spear fishing.
We are used to being cut off from the rest of the country for a week or two at a time.
At the fall of western civilization we wil block off the entrance, leave a few bodies of looters in the street and make the first row of condos look abandoned.
After all the zombie unprepared people have headed out to the country and died, we will subsist on fishing, catching rainwater and will sow my packets of seeds in the fenced in tennis court.
We plan to repopulate the world afterwards
One of my annoyances with the post 9/11 panics was the sheer amount of security theater. A main commuter road over a dam was shut down, disrupting traffic for years, because someone might drive a U-Haul full of fertilizer over it, that was the official justification. Great! Why not just forbid anything bigger than a sedan or even SUV?
Besides which, infrastructure is all over the place, completely unprotected. High voltage power lines would be easy to knock down. Just one will cause loss of power for at least days, more likely weeks, and a few of those, one every week or two, would make the public really jittery.
Or load up 5-gallon gas cans in the back of a pickup or U-Haul, dribble them out while driving over a major bridge, light i up -- you'd probably melt asphalt and kill a few hundred people with all the other traffic caught up in the conflagration, and that bridge would probably be weakened enough to need entire replacement.
Society depends on people cooperating and working together. Burglars aren't suicidal, normally. Murderers have personal reasons, mostly. And people don't go around cutting down power lines and burning bridges.
But when you force or bribe refugees into a country who don't speak the language, don't like the culture, and resent being stuffed into concentration camps and forbidden from working, they don't give a rat's ass about what damage they do. Willing immigrants who pay their own way and know they won't get a handout and criminal charges will be prosecuted don't sabotage the country they came to on their own.
That's the real lesson to learn, but the last thing any politician cares about is reality.
Not to mention a political-academic-media industry dedicated to convincing people that life sucks, the established systems (that make our cushy, safe, and mostly free society work) are evil and oppressive, and the only moral solution is violent revolution.
"And people don’t go around cutting down power lines and burning bridges."
Blowing up pipelines is something people do go around doing. I'm thinking of pipelines carrying gas from places like Russia to places like Germany. And they don't need U-Hauls or 5 gallon gas cans.
Fortunately, in the US, we have a transportation secretary chosen sole for his vast technical expertise in the field, not some diversity hire who never shows up for work.
So no worries.
I am not a prepper, but I am old enough to know how to live in what is now considered primitive conditions. That is, I can cook over a fire (and know how to start one) and suffer through heat without an A/C or cold without a furnace. My can opener is mechanical, not electric.
Racist!
Way back in 1997, a co-worker sent email to everybody he could, saying that from now until Y2K, we should all buy 3-4 times as much groceries and other supplies as we needed when we went shopping.
All I could think of was, (a) what am I going to do with 4 years of rice and beans and cans of soup, where am I going to store all that, how am I going to keep the bugs and mice out? And (b) if it really does get bad enough to need all that, society is going to be so fucked that it won’t matter, all my neighbors are going to notice I’m not harvesting grass and holly berries and acorns or trapping mice and gigging frogs, and I can’t stay up 24×7 for several years to guard my hoard.
A friend had a Mormon neighbor ask him why he wasn’t piling up a hoard, and he said he didn’t need to, since he knew where the Mormon lived.
Me, I withdrew $300 a few days before, the maximum ATMs would allow at the time. I figured worst case, some stupid cash registers won’t work for a few hours or even days, and the manager would distribute calculators and pads of paper to get IDs and phone numbers. They sure as shit aren’t going to refuse to sell groceries just because the cash registers aren’t working. If the power goes out or freezers stop working (yes, some people claimed freezers would stop working over Y2K), they’d give it all away before they’d let it all thaw and rot.
A friend had a Mormon neighbor ask him why he wasn’t piling up a hoard, and he said he didn’t need to, since he knew where the Mormon lived.
Good luck to your friend. Mormons are generally well armed. 🙂
I like the story about a burglar prowling around a house when he heard a voice behind him: "My friend, we in this house be Quakers, and would not harm thee for the world, but thou art standing where I am about to shoot."
Just another Carrington Event [Sept 1-2, 1859] from chaos.
It's far worse than folks realize.
I do DR/BCP and work outside of NYC. We need to assess certain use cases in order to build resiliency into business processes and systems. The most frightening use case was a complete loss of water and electricity in NYC.
If you do not have access to food and water, you start dying as early as three days. For vulnerable people it's a lot sooner. Additionally, if your apartment is on the 20th floor, it's useless. You would need to walk up and down 20 flights of stairs to an apartment that has no power or water. How do you flush a toilet without water? You essentially have no useful shelter.
NYC has a population of about 8M people. Within three days the city will quietly literally turn into a zombie apocalypse. Hungry, desperate people will be looking for food and shelter. They will leave the city in droves with no real plan other than feeding themselves and finding shelter. The suburbs will become a war zone. Some people in the suburbs will want to protect their homes. It will end badly for everyone.
If you don't have the resources at home to feed and protect yourself for at least three days, you're already behind.
The question to ask yourselves is: When everything electronic stops working, what do you do?
I thought the question to ask yourself was, "do I feel lucky?"
I've always said the urbanites will spill into the suburban areas, and the suburbanites will try spread to the rural areas.
That leaves us rural dwellers having to deal with starving desperate people. No thanks.
More ammo.
More backhoe.
This is a paraphrase of a radio evangelist "Rev. Ike" whom I remember from the 1970s saying "the best thing you can do for the poor is to not be one of them."
I apply this to survivors; if you are not in a position to take care of yourself and your own, you are just another mouth to feed, water, house...and are compounding the problem. You cannot help yourself, much less anyone else.
I believe the scenario you describe is all too realistic. Glad I do not live in a high rise apartment or in a metropolitan area, for that matter. And I am a long way from the zombies, and am equipped to deal with any I may encounter.
We, well at least most of us, hope to never encounter such an event in our lifetime. Or that of our children or our grand children. But as I commented above, a severe geomagnetic storm would knock out just about everything in our current lives, leading to a catastrophic breakdown. It is all too possible to ignore. And when a number of people are starving and freezing, they will get very very nasty.
In daylight, at least, read any of the books on the shelves of my three bookcases.
"The question to ask yourselves is: When everything electronic stops working, what do you do?"
Nope. Unlike the rest of you self-important narcissists I don't assume that the worst thing that can happen to the world is that I will no longer be living in it. Although I think it's reasonable to have a few days worth of non-perishable food stored up for temporary emergencies, if a real catastrophe happens and I die, so what? I am prepared to defend myself against most routine threats, but I do not want to live in a post-catastrophe world so I don't even try to prep for it.
More canned food for the rest of us then.
This sounds like the setup to a good movie.
"But let's also make sure we're not completely helpless when, inevitably, they become unavailable."
Could have at least provided a link to information that shows us how to do this.
No, this SERIOUSLY overstates the vulnerability of the modern world by overstating the damage done by such attacks (things are back to normal pretty damned quickly!) and by totally ignoring the fact that the modern world is MUCH LESS vulnerable to disruptive tactics than the world used to be BECAUSE of modern technological advances. I can even make a pretty good case that most of the disruption from such attacks is due to the incompetent response of those responsible for recovering from disruptions, especially in government. Witness COVID.
Enjoy your conveniences. But don’t let yourself become helpless in their absence.
I'm not. I own a car-- which ruined childhood, as I understand it.
Reason gently caresses fiber optic lines and trains
"Oh, so vulnerable to malicious actors, you poor, poor things!"
America's southern border
"OMG"
...the incidents illustrate how hard it is to secure the modern, interconnected world when bad actors can cause damage by striking from beyond the security perimeters.
Maybe try extending the security perimeter more than 100 yards next time.