Kamala's Fabricated Gen Z Appeal
Plus: French arson, Sinaloa cartel update, and more...

"kamala IS brat," tweeted singer Charli XCX on Sunday, following Vice President Kamala Harris' ascension to the presidential nominee slot left vacant by President Joe Biden. Despite Charli XCX's own advanced age of 31, she was speaking in slang immediately obvious to anyone under 30, especially the girls and the gays: brat is the album of the summer, with a distinctive neon green cover, full of references to Dimes Square podcaster-provocateurs, Julia Fox, party-girling hard, and—somehow, simultaneously—the lady anxiety that sets in when you're on the wrong side of your twenties and have not yet had a child.
Harris' team eagerly turned what they believed to be a pop star endorsement into a branding strategy; the X account "Kamala HQ" (1.1 million followers) adopted the distinctive color, font, and lowercase style Charli XCX's brat to craft their own banner image, reading "kamala hq." Meanwhile, the gay guys of New York City, who received the news of Biden pulling out whilst in their natural habit (Fire Island), quickly made crop tops in the exact same style of brat. A mashup cut of one of Harris' cringiest lines—some anecdote about coconut trees—was set to Charli XCX's song "Von dutch." It has received over 4 million views.
"The internet is going crazy for Harris' campaign," declares The 19th, a gender and politics website. Harris' "meme stock is bullish," adds CNN, which devoted a panel to the topic, in which a suit-wearing boomer tried, inartfully, to explain the craze to the rest. "Is Kamala Harris 'brat'?" asks The Economist, calling 2024 "America's TikTok election." "Younger celebs are aiming to help Harris by tying her to their viral and loyal social media brands," explains the Associated Press rather clinically.
"A brat should exude the je ne sais quoi of the famous-but-not-A-list women," writes Shirley Li, giving the phenomenon an overly intellectualized treatment typical of The Atlantic. "The brat is a classic feminine archetype, right up there with the jezebel, the crone, the bimbo, the career girl," writes Kat Rosenfield for The Free Press. "Brats are Cinderella's stepsisters, lacking both social graces and appropriate gratitude for the privileges they enjoy."
But what the hungry internet, full of writers looking for takes, and the Harris campaign miss is that being "brat" is not really a compliment.
"Brat" is someone who, per Charli XCX's own description, walks around with a "pack of cigs, a Bic lighter and a strappy white top with no bra." A girl "who feels like herself but maybe also has a breakdown. But kind of like parties through it, is very honest, very blunt. A little bit volatile. Like, does dumb things."
For the media to run with the idea that Harris has the youth vote locked down, because Charli XCX fired off a tweet (that may have been trolling) that took approximately 30 seconds to craft, betrays a certain thirst from all parties for an Obama 2.0-type campaign or for Harris to become a galvanizing Bernie Sanders-like figure. Perhaps more importantly, it contradicts the polling.
Harris is overall "doing much worse against Trump than Biden did in 2020" among youth voters, notes CNN polling analyst Harry Enten, which is backed up by Quinnipiac University polling conducted between July 19 and 21. "Moreover, young Democrats are NOT disproportionately more motivated to vote than other Democrats because of Biden's exit," notes Enten. A more recent New York Times/Siena College polling data complicates this narrative a bit, finding that "Harris fares better among young (18 to 29) and Hispanic voters than Mr. Biden did in any survey this year," which may not really be saying much. Biden performed notoriously poorly among these groups, so an improvement at the margins is good for Democrats, but possibly not a game changer. ("Conversely, [Harris] fares worse among white working-class voters and voters over 65 than Mr. Biden did in all but one prior Times/Siena poll," notes the same writeup.)
Perhaps more importantly, it's just really not the youth vote that actually matters this time around. It's nice to have, yes, but Harris needs to win Pennsylvania. Harris needs to win Arizona. Harris needs to win Michigan. Harris needs to win Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, and North Carolina. If she can gain traction with younger voters in those states, and/or meaningfully affect youth voter turnout, then that's helpful. Otherwise, the "Von dutch" memes don't mean squat.
"Young voters continue to feel largely negative about politics and voting, but hopefulness has increased since June," finds Change Research in a report released Wednesday that finds young people are in fact excited about Harris and more likely to turn out as a result. But still, "the top emotions associated with voting are all negative: in a select-all question, 53% chose 'anxious,' 43% 'fearful,' 38% 'overwhelmed,' and 37% 'angry.' But hopefulness has risen from 23% to 30%" following Biden's exit and Harris' entry into the race.
Kamala isn't brat. Kamala is a mediocre candidate, perceived as a kooky wine aunt who says outlandish things, capitalizing on a moment of virality amid an otherwise bleak political landscape in which young voters realize that politicians rarely deliver on their promises.
Scenes from New York: The Department of Sanitation is trying to get New Yorkers to become snitches.
QUICK HITS
- "California Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an executive order Thursday to direct state agencies on how to remove homeless encampments, a month after a Supreme Court ruling allowing cities to enforce bans on sleeping outside in public spaces," reports the Associated Press.
- Sinaloa Cartel leaders have been arrested by U.S. authorities.
- Both Barack and Michelle Obama endorsed Kamala Harris for president in a slightly cringe call that the Harris campaign released as a campaign video.
- The French train system has been hit by arsonists merely hours before the Olympics is scheduled to start.
- Boy, Kamala Harris sure knows how to appeal to Rust Belt normies:
????????BREAKING: Kamala Harris just started her official campaign with Ru Paul and his drag queens. pic.twitter.com/EJ1ccMEcO7
— Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) July 25, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
kamala IS brat
She's the wurst.
This was the Rickey Henderson of leadoff comments. What hat will your bust be wearing in the Hall?
I'd have to think someone else already thought of it.
Is this an admission that Chumby is caged in your basement?
Fist is 100 times more clever than that paid propagandist, chumpy.
Fuck off Buttplug you demented old pedo, and quit socking me.
I suggest a universal mute for PB (and all his socks).
>>This was the Rickey Henderson of leadoff comments.
love this.
The first reaction of my teenaged daughter was, "has she heard the lyrics?"
Yeah, doesn't really seem like a complement.
They're not counting on the base actually thinking about it.
[X] is cool.
Kalama is [X].
Kalama is cool!
WIN!
It's no different than cheering for the Puerto Ricans that were protesting her. She's oblivious, but it must be a good thing, so go along with it.
She's certainly experienced with frankfurters.
She’s the wurst.
That's Hitler's language!
Kamala can’t cut the mustard.
But can she hide the sausage?
I think she’s had more wieners than Joey Chestnut.
Did she eat Anthony’s Weiner?
ENB should interview Kamala about her prior experience with having to screw former San Francisco mayor Willie Brown to get ahead in public office. There are all forms of sexwerk, and I think Reason owes it to their readers to explore this fascinating area of their preferred candidates’ rich history.
Kamala might be the most "try hard" candidate I've ever seen in my life.
Obama was a dork, but he did come not come across as so desperate to look cool.
She really is the epitome of middle-aged woman who sees herself as a "cool wine mom" that all of her teenaged kids friends love, when the whole time they're making fun of her while playing Fortnite in the basement.
"The internet is going crazy for Harris' campaign," declares The 19th, a gender and politics website. Harris' "meme stock is bullish," adds CNN
Honestly, one of Snowden’s revelations was that governments manipulate webtraffic, and the number of hits a website records. He showed specifically how the UK did it, IIRC.
How soon we forget.
She can deep throat a big sausage
Hot Dog!
"Brats are Cinderella's stepsisters, lacking both social graces and appropriate gratitude for the privileges they enjoy."
If the shoe doesn't fit...
The step-sisters 100% would have blown Prince Charming to move up in society.
One cut off her toes to fit in the shoe, the other cut off her heel.
So, yeah, they're just jelly Kamala found an easier way.
You must acquit…
If the shoe doesn’t fit…
She's no Dick Cheney.
swallow don't spit
Kamala is a mediocre candidate, perceived as a kooky wine aunt who says outlandish things, capitalizing on a moment of virality amid an otherwise bleak political landscape...
The perfect president for our times.
Whitmer can suck it.
[Post to be removed at a later date when sobriety sets in and it comes time to pick a VP].
Gay guys? News of pulling out?
My goodness, you are naughty, Liz.
Life is a cabaret?
I have to admit, that did make me chuckle.
Gas lighting media still gaslighting.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/to-prove-fealty-to-kamala-harris-the-media-gaslights-voters-by-rewriting-her-past/ar-BB1qEZyi?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=DCTS&cvid=b9a204729b5e4113a0cc0539d889677e&ei=16
Is it bad that they lie so much they can't keep them straight, or should we just all be happy that they are also heavily involved on the side of the democracy defenders?
For yelling about Russians and Trump so much, the media sure loves old USSR tactics of erasing the past.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an executive order Thursday to direct state agencies on how to remove homeless encampments...
Before the cold of November hits, set them up in temporary housing in precinct voting centers.
The President we *actually* need?
They need to do that in California?
Gavin Newsom issued order to remove homeless encampments
So he IS running then.
Either that or they’re trying to lighten Kamala’s CA baggage.
Good luck with that, Democrats.
Don't under-estimate the DNC-media complex. In a couple of months, they will tell us that nobody has ever been homeless or camped under a freeway in California.
Make blankets for the homeless out of all the extra absentee ballots!
Perhaps more importantly, it’s just really not the youth vote that actually matters this time around. It’s nice to have, yes, but Harris needs to win Pennsylvania. Harris needs to win Arizona. Harris needs to win Michigan. Harris needs to win Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, and North Carolina.
Fortification activated!!!
Shape of... a vote collector! Form of... an ice block!
Yeah, the Wonder Twins suck.
I think it's just going to be too hard to fraud enough this time.
They have a few choices left:
1. Shoot down Trump's jet and blame it on a mechanical issue despite hundreds of witnesses filming the missile or fighter attack.
2. Use a small tactical nuke on whatever city Trump is in. Blame it on Iran or Russia.
3. Cancel the election.
One thing that they will not do is let Trump become president again. They can't. They've done way too many illegal and unconstitutional things already.
One thing that they will not do is let Trump become president again. They can’t. They’ve done way too many illegal and unconstitutional things already.
Illegal and unconstitutional doesn't matter when you control the agencies. There is no accountability.
Whatever they do, they risk civil war. The next assassination attempt will be the trigger.
It's looking more and more like they WANT a civil war. They think they'll win with their F-15s and their nukes. Our military will have to choose a side.
The top echelons already have. Now we have to see if the rank and file choose to follow them. There's only so many furries and drag queens in the lower ranks.
The rank and file will try to pick the winner. They won't want to be left standing when the music stops.
No, they are not going to stop trying to kill Trump just because the first assassin missed. Too many of them will face prison, the firing squad, or at least financial ruin if there's another Trump presidency.
And with the Secret Service recently coming out and suggesting that Trump avoid all outdoor rallies, they will blame the next, successful, assassination attempt on Trump himself for not going along with their "safety" advice.
If he does go along with their advice, it seriously hinders his ability to win a clean election (which this won't be). So it's a win-win for the deep state.
I agree, all those Military officers that disobeyed orders and lied about what they where doing in the Middle East, all those mid-level bureaucrats that hindered policies, all those FBI / CIA etc who railroaded and coerced the brainless to create charges to hurt Trump all of these and more that then bragged about what they did know if Trump gets back in he now has ammo to remove them. If only they could have kept their mouths shut but they had to tell everyone how smart they where.
Sinaloa Cartel leaders have been arrested by U.S. authorities.
The CIA ain't gonna like that!
You don't break their piggybank.
Law enforcement won't significantly affect them. We need some cruise missiles on their haciendas.
From current events, seems the Sinaloa Cartel could take some migrants as hostages and Harris would set their leaders free.
If she will side with kidnappers that use their victims as human shield, why not with the cartel?
I so loved seeing that MN channel claiming that the GOP was making up Kamala's support of the bail fund. Even after they specifically asked about that a few years ago.
Given their hatred for it, I guess we're not suffering natural gaslighting.
Both Barack and Michelle Obama endorsed Kamala Harris for president...
They're confident the machinery this fall will overcome any of KAHMala's glaring deficiencies.
Obama was holding out for a white woman.
Hillary's just a phone call and a cyanide dart away.
Which Obama?
"Kamala's Fabricated Gen Z Appeal"
...(its not just Gen Z)
She's incredible. Best politician of my lifetime. Who else have you ever seen build such a grassroots movement that she went from quitting the primary before voting to being the party's nominee next time? Absolutely amazing.
Harris' "meme stock is bullish," adds CNN
A leftist's meme stock is never bullish.
Move the i and add a t.
"... declares The 19th, a gender and politics website."
Ill go to them for meme suggestions right after stopping by my local vegan pop up for advice on BBQ
Nothing says young and hip like the phrase meme stock is bullish.
Looks like they misspelled “bullshit”.
No, a leftist’s meme stock is bullshitish.
...in a slightly cringe call that the Harris campaign released as a campaign video.
Cringe enough that apparently they removed it.
Apparently, staged cringe calls are the go to for her campaign.
She's out there in them streets, after all
2008 called; it wants its “Rock the Vote” back.
2004 called. Diddy wants his “vote or die” back.
Along with his life, reputation, A-list status…..
Seriously, what is it with this cackling hag and her dumb cell phone videos?
Kamala Harris just started her official campaign with Ru Paul and his drag queens.
YOU HAVE THOSE VOTES ALREADY, DIPSHIT.
I'd imagine the sanitation department's rank and file are fully engaged after that.
Hey now!
Does she? Maybe the campaign feels like its base is sorely lacking enthusiasm.
I think Harris can pickup the youth that Biden lost due to his stance on Israel. However, she may lose the Jewish vote which Biden was trying to balance.
She seems to be for the ICC going after Israel. What happens if they go after Biden for supplying weapons for those transgressions.
What's interesting is the omitting that the ICC is charging Hamas leaders too.
What happens if they go after Biden for supplying weapons for those transgressions.
Then you'll hear all the Dems talk about how they support the USSC decision upholding immunity to Presidents for official acts. And they've always been at war with Eastasia, er, supported immunity for Presidents.
It would be (D)ifferent.
"California Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an executive order Thursday to direct state agencies on how to remove homeless encampments,"
Is uncle Xi coming to town again?
Did he ever really leave?
The reason the Democrats never wanted Kamala in the first place is because they know they don't have anything to run. That's WHY they're embracing all this pop culture schlock. Pick ANY issue - social, economic, foreign, domestic - and what's her campaign's platform on it? Other than the overall generic Democrat sentiment?
The media is pretending otherwise, but this is still the same old desperation campaign they were running with Tapioca Joe. "Young people should like her because we say so." And "she's not Trump."
That's all they're running on. While simultaneously ignoring/downplaying/criticizing anyone who points out that the Democrat bloc REALLY wants the opportunity to vote for an alternative, instead of having Kammy shoved on them against their will.
You still have to feed the lamb you're going to slaughter.
How is Trump different?
Trump's platform is: I hate Democrats and many Republicans
Harris: I also hate Republicans.
I agree. In fact, one thing I've been telling the MAGA/Trump crowd is if they're going to earn my vote, they need to start articulating their plans.
Specifically for the border. Trump's planning on sealing it and deporting all the illegals? Great, I'm 100% for that. Now tell me HOW he's going to accomplish that so I can decide if that's a reasonable approach or if he's just blowing smoke.
He's punting on abortion and LGBT pedo? OK, not a fan - but at least tell me how you're going to defend the States that have decided they're not OK with that garbage, against the attacks of the blue states that want to undermine them.
Hamas, and by extension Iran - what's the plan? I'm OK with military action, but I want to know there's an actual plan in place.
I'm not going to vote for platitudes and bromides. I won't do it for Trump, and I certainly won't do it for Kamala.
It's hard to justify your TDS when you're called on your bullshit, isn't it?
So now supporting most of what Trump wants to do, but wanting details on how it will be done is TDS?
Shut up and drink the orange kool-aid, Zeb.
Sincerely,
-Sevo.
FOAD, TDS-addled pile of shit.
Sincerely,
Sevo.
Withholding support until you get full details is justification for a bullshit stance. Is that a surprise to you?
Honestly, I would even settle for just a rough outline. But we're not even getting that.
Pathetic..
I know, right? Why can't they provide even a rough outline? Why is it all just puffery and platitudes?
They've got a real chance at winning, but only seem to want to pander to the people who are already certain to vote for them. It's stupid.
Shame on him for not giving you a sit-down, right?
Keep going; I'm not going to take your shovel away when you're digging that deep.
Not just me. ALL his voters. All the people whose vote he wants to court.
You strike me as kind of a low-fo follow-the-crowd type, Sev. Like some sort of Pavlovian dog that just knows when to bark based on having been conditioned to certain triggers. That is to say, not much of a real thinker.
Like, for example, "Build the wall." I'll bet you ate that up and asked for seconds and thirds, right? But then, what did you get out of it? Half a wall with a friggin' door that the Democrats could - and did - swing wide open any time they want. But hey, it looked and sounded good - so you didn't give it any real thought and declared the border problem solved.
And even if you were disappointed by that by 2020, you know it ahead of time going into 2024. You KNOW he didn't have a plan. You KNOW he didn't have a meaningful roadmap to achieving the promises he was making.
Well, now it IS 2024 - and, fool me once. So, yea, it's really NOT all that much to ask that the candidate you want me to vote for explain his specific plans that should earn him our vote.
That you don't even want it just makes you a cult zealot. Like I said - orange kool aid.
Were you born yesterday? Candidates for President don't give specifics, ever, and if they do they don't win the Presidency.
Trump has already been President, so you more or less know what you're getting there. Like it or hate it, I don't think anyone is really 'mystified' by what he offers. If you are mystified, that's on you for not paying attention to politics since at least 2016.
Kamala is a sex worker, and you more or less know what you're getting there too. You get the Democrat platform, good and hard. If you like the Democrats platform, vote for her, because there is no noticeable difference between her and the party leadership.
AT, I don't understand your position. I get that you would like Trump to come out and give specifics to how he plans to accomplish border security. But if he doesn't, you don't know that you can vote for him? If border security is an important issue for you, and it justifiably is for the country, how can you consider voting for a different candidate? Kamala will be at least as bad on the border as Joe was, Chase Oliver would probably be even worse than that.
Are you saying the alternative to voting for Trump is not voting? Sure, I've had that thought in past elections myself. But if you believe the border situation is of extreme importance, I don't see how the choice isn't easy for you. The CHANCE that it could improve (with a 2nd Trump term), or the certainty it will not and will likely get worse, perhaps much worse.
I want to know that he's serious about the issue.
He didn't have a problem with this in 2016. He told us his plan flat out, "We're going to build a wall, we're going to keep them from entering the country. And we're going to make Mexico pay for it." Wasn't a great plan - arguably, it was a downright stupid one - but at least it was an articulated plan. He did the same thing with China. "We're going to tariff them until they start dealing fairly." Again, like it or dislike it, it was a plan. He did the same thing with NATO. "You're going to pay your fair share, or we're not going to help you anymore." Plan. The Iranian terrorist state. "We're going to dump the JCPOA." Plan.
What's the plan now? For ANY of it?
I don’t think anyone is really ‘mystified’ by what he offers.
I'm not mystified about it. I get the policy directions he wants to go. But dropping chum partisan buzzwords that I like to hear aren't plans. They're not even goals. It's just pandering. It's like he's trading exclusively off nostalgia (albeit a relatively recent one). His whole campaign seems to be summed up as a general, "Miss me yet?"
Well, sure, I'm pretty darned unhappy over Tapioca Joe - but that's not a check mark in Trump's column, as if that's earned him some kind of credit. "I'm not the other guy," implies plenty about the other guy - who I am also not mystified about - but nothing specific about Trump and his plans should he be awarded the White House in 2024.
I want to know the plans. And I don't see why it's so unreasonable to ask them before blindly handing over a vote. Otherwise your whole argument is just a roundabout way of the same old lesser-of-two-evils, "Who cares, just so long as he's not the other guy."
I get that you would like Trump to come out and give specifics to how he plans to accomplish border security. But if he doesn’t, you don’t know that you can vote for him? If border security is an important issue for you, and it justifiably is for the country, how can you consider voting for a different candidate?
Well, let's put it this way.
Suppose Trump were to say, "I want border security. We're going to round up the illegals and make sure they never come back." Well, OK, those things all appeal to me - but what does that mean, and how will he make good on it?
Now imagine someone like Randall Terry were to say - for the record he has NOT said anything like this, but for sake of argument here: "I also want border security. To that end, I'm going to veto any legislation from Congress until I see a bill on my desk that curbs any American taxpayer dollars contributing to the social welfare of illegal aliens. In a similar fashion, I am going to direct my Dept. of Education to remove any illegal alien children from public school classrooms, and direct their student records to the attention of ICE. The same will go for anyone who presents for medical treatment under EMTALA who cannot ultimately provide proof of citizenship. In addition, I will utilize my powers as Commander in Chief to send armed forces to shore up the efforts of Border Patrol and similar State-led efforts."
Maybe that's overly specific, and maybe he can't even deliver on the promise - but at least it's a clear plan with clear goals and the means by which he aims to achieve them. I mean, if your single issue is border control - mine's not, by the way, but it's easily the biggest issue - then hasn't (AT-imagined) Terry made a better case for his election than Trump?
But, of course, the counterargument is: "Who the hell is Randall Terry?!" And I get that argument - but that's not what I'm asking. I'm asking that if one candidate makes a better case for his policy than another, then why wouldn't he get your vote?
Because has no chance of winning? So what? Are you voting for what you want; or voting for platitudes and, ultimately, "whatever who cares, just not the other guy."
Trump has said that police need more power and complete immunity to round up illegals. Not sure how he could accomplish that though.
Yea, but that's not an outline, let alone a plan.
I can tell you right here, right now, where to find a half-dozen illegals in my city. (And no, not the obvious ones hanging out curbside at Home Depot or U-Haul.) I know where they are. I could tell him where they are. What's Trump going to do to round them up and kick them out?
Right now he can't do much because local police aren't empowered to enforce federal law. He'd have to deputize all cops as federal law enforcement officers. Federal officials also enjoy absolute immunity, so I imagine local cops would get that too. If you think police abuse their power knowing they have qualified immunity, imagine how much more corrupt they will be with absolute immunity.
Personally I don't think the trade off is worth it. But I also don't have a boner for rounding up people for the crime of not having papers.
Is he planning on doing that? Can you cite me somewhere where he's said that's his plan?
He has said that police need immunity from criminal prosecution, which I suppose is true since it would be illegal for local cops to round up immigrants. Hasn't specified how. I was just giving my best guess. As far as a citation goes, just google it and choose your favorite source.
Sarc. Can you just post your citations or are you actually embarassed that Google puts leftist abd corporate cites at top yet you depend solely on them?
I bet you can cite this sarc. You keep pushing the door to door knocking which is not what he has ever said. You can't even find it on google.com
Question for you AT. Have you listened to or read many of the long form interviews from those closest to him like Vivek? Have you gone to their campaign sites?
The problem is your want details largely dependent on Congress. For immigration he is going to implement similar policies as before with the added deportation proceedings when illegals get arrested foe other crimes. Empower judges for quick asylum decisions.
For reduction of the deep state he has said he was going to use Vivek's plans. He had already implemented a rule the first term to make them easier to fire, undone by Joe.
For energy he is going to sign a shit ton of permits under his power.
Not sure which details you think are missing.
The problem is your want details largely dependent on Congress.
Indeed they are. So, assuming he has even a slightly hostile/resistant Congress, what's this alleged Statesman's plan for convincing them to his side? What plan does he hope to sell them, and what are its merits that said Congressmen can take back to their constituents to explain why they should/will support Trump in it?
For reduction of the deep state he has said he was going to use Vivek’s plans. He had already implemented a rule the first term to make them easier to fire, undone by Joe.
For energy he is going to sign a shit ton of permits under his power.
So, pen and phone then?
Like, y'know, the utter failure of his first term all of which was easily undone within 90 days of his ouster?
Let's repeat the same actions and hope for different results?
This is a very weird comment from you.
First you say he may have a hostile congress, so won’t get stuff done. Then complain he will do what he actually has power to do.
Which is it?
Some of his actions, like the rules regarding firing, can be implemented day one so he has time to execute. Vivek has a grand plan for firings based on reductions, not cause. Trump has said he is open to that. Trump also agreed woth Vivek ok changing appropriation bill language to allow spending reductions, from shall to may so he isny forced by Impoundment Act to spend every dollar congress allocates.
You can’t complain about him using the powers he has and then also complain he is going to use the powers he has without congress.
He isn’t a king. He doesn’t control congress. But youre damning him with any action taken.
No, think of it this way:
His first course of action should be to appeal to Congress. State of the Union - this is where we are, this is where I'd like us to be, this is what I'm seeking Legislative assistance with to get us there. Please help me, guys. (Someone might have to teach him the word "please.")
His second course of action should be to continue to appeal to Congress. Guys, here's what I want and here's what I'll concede on to get it. (Someone might have to teach him the word "concession.")
His third course of action should be to appeal to the constituents of hostile Congressmen - especially to the sleeping Reds in Blue States, but to the Blues as well to whatever degree he might reach any of them. Take his case to the People, and ask their help in demanding that their Congressman reflect their will. Make the case. Sell the people on it. Get them to exert their pressure on Congress. (Someone might have to remind him that the President represents ALL Americans, not just the ones who voted for him. And if he scoffs, equate him with Barack.)
In the meantime, if the wounds are still hemorrhaging, utilize limited agency power to triage them. But don't think of it as a solution - which is precisely what he did, do not even attempt to deny that - think of it as a temporary fix that still needs to be ultimately dealt with. And, play to his strength - utilize social media to illustrate the Will of the People. Regularly meet with average Americans in televised events. Be willing to engage them like Vivek does.
I don't want a king. But it sounds like most Americans do. Or, at least, a benevolent dictator. Depending on their definition of "benevolent."
Sevo has become disappointingly repetitive of late.
As have the TDS-addled shits.
You haven't muted him yet?
Oh, oh! I'm so saddened! FOAD.
Yesterday or the day before, actually. It was the incessant repetition of the same damned comment over and over again, mostly. Like, yes, we get it. You don't like this or that commenter, and have reposted what they said. I don't need to see it fifteen times. I have no interest in reading Sqrsly's spam, either.
Kinda sucks, because Sevo is certainly capable of making useful, on topic comments that show insight. But most of the time lately, he just doesn't. So, fuck it, whatever. I'm not going to pick through heaps of manure looking for jewels that may not even be there on a given day.
People support Trump because the machine hates him. The rationale is if it's that much against him then he must be a danger to it.
Hopefully they're right. But if they're not it's still better than supporting the monster itself.
He doesn't seem to have learned much about making good appointments. I do think he's vastly preferable to the alternative, but I'm not expecting any big changes to how the swamp runs if he gets a second term.
Yeah, the SCOTUS nominations, DeVos, Ajit Pai, all bad choices, right?
Man, the gymnastics assholes will attempt to justify their TDS is worthy of at least a bronze.
FOAD, TDS-addled shit.
"Drain the swamp!"
(By filling it with a revolving door of department heads that accomplish nothing, or make things even worse. Do nothing whatsoever about the bureaucrats.)
Well, maybe not a bronze. Pathetic.
Sure he had some good ones. But also lots of swamp creatures who have no interest in changing anything. It's not derangement to expect to see some kind of plan. TDS goes both ways as Sevo demonstrates daily in attacking people who think Trump is preferable but have doubts about his ability to deliver on what he says he wants to do.
It really feels like he learned his lesson with who he has surrounded himself with. People like Vivek being the biggest. Friendlier with Freedom Caucus members and such.
I hope so. I'd love to see someone like Vivek in some powerful position.
I want RFK Jr. as Director of National Security. 😀
On what basis do you claim that “it really feels like” that? Remember, this is the same dude that glowingly endorsed Mitt frickin' Romney.
Because last time he brought in people like Bolton. This time he isnt.
He basically now has 7 years under his belt instead of 4 months with Chris Christie leading the staff and Pence as VP.
Has he intimated who he plans on bringing in this time around, besides JDV?
Gee, he didn't end the government! Thanks.
The Swamp is going to fight to the death. They can't be removed by an election.
At the end of his first the rule was finally in place to reform the deep state. The rule was undone by Joe.
You have to vote for it before you can find out what's in it.
Except the fact he implemented many of the policies he actually an on, sure. I get it. Both sides. The dying cry of democrats cosplaying as libertarians.
Restrict voting rights to people who pay net positive taxes.
And include government salaries as part of the calculation.
Done.
How would you calculate that? Who doesn't benefit from government expenditures?
"...net positive taxes."
Gee, maybe you muted your brain, asshole.
Direct payments, or subcontractors to government agencies, or other government "entitlements". I'm willing to exempt the military on this one.
Direct payments, or subcontractors to government agencies, or other government “entitlements”.
^ This.
Anyone that directly profits from government has a conflict of interest in electing the representatives for that government. The biggest offenders of all being public employees unions which double upon the conflict.
I would allow enlisted and retired members of the military to vote but restrict active officers. Management should not get to choose the people to whom they are accountable.
If they don't like not having a vote, they can always choose not to take the peoples' money.
The French train system has been hit by arsonists merely hours before the Olympics is scheduled to start.
The Frogs graduated from burning Citroëns.
she was speaking in slang immediately obvious to anyone under 30, especially the girls and the gays
[Revels in dopamine hit from asking teenage sons what it meant and them having no idea.]
a kooky wine aunt who says outlandish things
That's pretty good.
And the Donnie vibe is the drunk uncle who shows up every Thanksgiving and tries to feel up his nieces.
Marketing matters. Very few undecideds vote issues.
Remember Dubya? - people thought they would like drinking a beer with him.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
“Remember Dubya? – people thought they would like drinking a beer with him.”
Yes.
To be more specific, your people. The Cheney’s, Ryan’s, Romney’s, Frum’s, Kristol’s, French’s, Boot’s and all the other neocons you’ve pumped here.
“Donnie vibe is the drunk uncle who shows up every Thanksgiving and tries to feel up his nieces.”
Buttplug speaks from experience.
Also, this is an ironic smear coming from the troll who socks as “The Biden Guy”, whose namesakes’ own daughter wrote he tried to fuck her.
“The Biden Guy”
Not me, dipshit.
She (probably AmSoc) voted for Jill Stein - the worst candidate in history. AmSoc has taken on many user names.
turd, the TDS-addled asshole of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
If “she’s” not you, then “she” fucked up on a few posts using your favorite slang and buzzwords. Also, you were definitely Americansocia1ist
American Socia1ist 3 years ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
America’s longest war is over
Hip hip hooray! Libertarian peanuts in the comments seem pissed. Maybe they should pay for the bombs dropping on poor people. Fuck them
https://reason.com/2021/08/31/americas-longest-war-is-over/?comments=true#comment-9076679
It is impossible to believe that more than one human being would use "peanuts" the way shrike does.
I’ve also seen both SPB2 and Biden Guy talk about “adrenochrome” but spell it incorrectly as “adenochrome.” Perhaps they are different people, and both just happen to talk about the same obscure thing, with both missspelling it the same way. Or, much more likely, Biden Guy is one of SPB2’s socks.
And for SPB2, Biden Guy, and American Socia1ist, all to use the stupid "peanuts" insult, we can likely include Am Soc as another one of SPB2's stupd sock accounts.
Couch-Fucker Vance should NOT have taken on the Swifties.
I thought Trump was a lock to win the election, but now with Tay Tay’s Army against him, it’s a whole new race.
All she has to do is let Kelce knock her up.
Language.
Here's the thing - the childless cat ladies never come out of their own hyper-feminist bubble, at least not before their mid-30s.
Then they hit the wall. And it is not a pretty sight.
And then that looming vision of how utterly miserable and lonely they are - loneliness that their "furbabies" can't possibly make up for - hits them like a brick to the face. Yea, the particularly affluent (like Taylor) might avoid its reality with an endless parade of money and casual sex, but the former can only buy so much, and the latter is only as available as their dwindling sex appeal. (And let's not kid ourselves, even the Swifties, enamored with the Travis/Taylor drama, are hoping that Kelce makes an honest woman out of her at some point.)
But, to be sure, the childless cat ladies are almost exclusive a blue bastion thing in the first place. Which Trump/Vance has little likelihood of winning over in the first place.
Repeal the 19th.
How many divisions does Taylor have?
Probably better if we don't ask that. We might not like the answer.
“Brat” is someone who, per Charli XCX’s own description, walks around with a “pack of cigs, a Bic lighter and a strappy white top with no bra.” A girl “who feels like herself but maybe also has a breakdown. But kind of like parties through it, is very honest, very blunt. A little bit volatile. Like, does dumb things.”
AH! Duh. [thumps side of head]
I’m not really sure that’s the kind of person who should be “the leader of the free world”. Much less a presidential candidate.
It does sound like a democrat constituency.
I know that Hunter is a fan of the type.
Fuck off, Buttplug, you demented old pedo.
So the Democrats are embracing Harris’s image as unpleasant, incompetent, cognitively dissonent, and possibly mentally unwell?
Own it!
She's the AWFL poster child.
Sounds #girlboss to me.
#girlslaver
She did order the continued incarceration of people past their release day for free labor
When you put it that way it sounds like it actually would be sexist not to support her replacing Joe.
Skin color is the most important thing.
https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1816438336409444473
A glimpse of how the Harris campaign sees the voters. VP choice is focusing on several white male candidates. Source ‘familiar with the campaign’s thinking’ says: ‘Let’s just face it. There’s a lot of sexist, racist white dudes out there in America who don’t like Trump, but just need a little extra validation.’
No dudes.
They are stuck with girl power - NEW/YOUNG. go full tilt.
I would suggest that 2A loving Washington state Congresswoman who runs a car repair shop. She screams working class.
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez - contrast her with the fake Hillbilly.
It's all marketing now.
turd, TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Until you look at every study of I group bias and find that whites are the lowest
That's amusingly a tacit admission they want to attract racist voters, just not super racist voters.
Weird to be that honest about it.
Also weird to be so blatantly racist and sexist themselves on the subject, but I suppose these types aren't known for their introspection either.
"...Julia Fox, party-girling hard, and—somehow, simultaneously—the lady anxiety that sets in when you're on the wrong side of your twenties and have not yet had a child..."
It would be helpful if we stuck to English here.
The Age of Liberal Groupthink:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/07/american-life-under-liberal-conformism/
"Liberal groupthink is the most important factor in the general-opinion environment and has been for all my life. But now, because liberal groupthink is subject to sudden eruptive enthusiasms and insanity-inducing reversals, American life proceeds with a sense that the laws of physics don’t really apply. There’s a creepy unsettledness to life in America. And it’s because journalists are lobotomizing themselves in the name of their favorite cause, the Democratic Party."
"I’ve watched liberals converge on the opinion that anti-Chinese racism was more dangerous than the coronavirus and that the vaguely libertarian Silicon Valley people who were concerned about it were kind of racist. Then, almost overnight, they converged on the opposite opinion, that the coronavirus was a threat that justified the suspension of normal life indefinitely. Also, they improbably converged on the theory that it was racist to believe that the virus had emerged from a lab in Wuhan that was experimenting with coronaviruses. Somehow, because progressives believed it, it was less racist to believe that it emerged from the folklore-driven superstition and disgusting hygiene practices around Chinese wet markets.
And then, even as religious minorities were being demonized as antisocial sociopaths and killers for gathering — outside, no less — for funerals, liberal opinion instantly switched to the idea that social distancing was no longer mandatory, enormous public demonstrations (and riots) were now mandatory, and so was defunding the police."
"It’s clear that liberal opinion conformity is driven by something more than the pressures of social media and the way they hypercharge opinion-sharing and make it obvious where the wind is blowing. It is driven by the unprecedented levels of cynicism, cowardice, and insecurity of the liberal opinion-forming class itself. This is a generation of people who have had the least amount of moral formation in our history. With them incumbent, we no longer have sense-making institutions; we have a nonsense-infected mob that destroys the reputations of all the institutions in which its members are nominally stationed.
I find it psychotic that Kamala Harris went overnight from an emergency option to a cult of personality."
"I find it psychotic that Kamala Harris went overnight from an emergency option to a cult of personality."
My initial reaction was "this is COVID level of psyop gaslighting". The connection is pretty clear. The machinery is already in place and well oiled
Why would people fall for their gaslighting?
Not would, have.
I just watched one of the greatest gaslighting episode in my life.
Intentional or not, the progressive push for a culture and ethos of weak victimhood, borderline psychosis, and catastrophism has created a huge population of people with severe emotional dependencies. The Democrat-establishment-media industrial complex clearly takes advantage of this, inventing crises and then promising salvation. Add to that a common human need for a Dear Leader, and I am not surprised at how eagerly the faithful have embrace Kamalama as their next lord and savior.
FBI trying like, shrike, to downplay assassination attempt.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fbi-director-suggests-donald-trump-may-not-have-been-struck-by-bullet-during-assassination-attempt-at-rally/ar-BB1qAUdq?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=0f275fc1fd944d309cc4905c1f47e1d9&ei=753
Wray said that the object that cut Donnie's ear was still undetermined.
Of course Donnie refused to be examined - they are aksing for the CT to form.
Me? I don't think it is very interesting.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Back to the teleprompter theory plug?
No.
People be aksing questions though.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Shut up, Sevo.
Go take your fucking Droxy like Donnie told you to. Mix it with some fentanyl. You'll get better.
turd, ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
turd, ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"People be aksing questions though."
Or at least that's what you and Wray are hoping.
What evidence is there of something being shattered that could have been the cause?
Using the teleprompter example just for this example. If a teleprompter was shattered then that would be evidence that it could have been from the teleprompter.
Absent of finding something close to Trump that was shatter, then the FBI would be making it up. There would be no basis for the FBI claim.
Absent of finding something close to Trump that was shatter, then the FBI would be making it up. There would be no basis for the FBI claim.
The whole point of Wray doing that was to try and nerf Trump looking like Billy Badass after getting shot. Wray knows damn well his fellow Democrats in the media-industrial complex will start squawking like 9/11 truthers because an "expert" called it into question.
Wray's a great example of why the entire Democratic political class, and that includes the media, need to be shoved through woodchippers.
I'm still not sure why this matters.
Yeah, seems silly. I don’t think there is any doubt that he was shot at and was lucky not to have been killed. What difference if a bullet grazed his ear or missed by a foot?
There is no doubt that a bullet grazed his ear. I actually know why it matters, but I want everyone making this assertion to say, but they won’t. But in the rational human world, it doesn’t matter. His injury is minor– no one is denying that. It’s not like he’s going to come out on stage with a neck brace or limping on a cane. There was an assassination attempt on his life, so in my mind, the only question left is what did Hillary Clinton know and when did she know it?
""Hillary Clinton know and when did she know it?""
Killlary doesn't miss.
Kinda hard to shotgun yourself in the back of your head while on stage at a rally ...
FBI followed later with
“What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject’s rifle,” the agency said in a statement.
The one-sentence statement from the FBI marked the most definitive law enforcement account of Trump’s injuries and followed ambiguous comments earlier in the week from Director Christopher Wray that appeared to cast doubt on whether Trump had actually been hit by a bullet.
EU Commissioner Makes Online Censorship Key Campaign Pledge
https://newsbusters.org/blogs/free-speech/catherine-salgado/2024/05/22/eu-commissioner-makes-online-censorship-key-campaign
Von der Leyen posted an anti-free speech adon X (formerly Twitter) May 20. “Europe must be able to defend itself - against all kinds of attacks. I will propose a European Democracy Shield,” the incumbent president and candidate posted. “To detect disinformation and malign interference To remove content, including AI deepfakes[.] To make our societies more resilient.”
NEW – The bureaucrats of the European Union want to build a comprehensive database of the assets owned by all citizens….
https://meshnews.org/breaking/new-the-bureaucrats-of-the-european-union-want-to-build-a-comprehensive-database-of-the-assets-owned-by-all-citizens/
Focus reports that the EU Asset Register is expected to be a comprehensive database that records a wide range of assets owned by citizens, including real estate, bank accounts, securities, vehicles, and possibly works of art or precious metals.
European politicians are a horrifying shitshow.
It might be fun to watch Putin have his way with them.
its easier to steal when you know who has what that way you don't have to go door to door
a European Democracy Shield
This level of newspeak is downright creepy.
These marxists sure do love their euphemisms.
Many of them were English majors.
Joe Biden More Likely to Survive 4-Year Term Than Trump, 'Super-Ager' Study Finds
Published Oct 03, 2020 at 5:46 PM EDT
https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-more-likely-survive-4-year-term-trump-super-ager-study-finds-1536219
Opinion: Age matters. Which is why Biden’s age is his superpower
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-02-09/joe-biden-donald-trump-nikki-haley-election-2024-age
Get Used to It: Biden Isn’t Going Anywhere
The GOP fantasy crowd is so accustomed to conspiracy theories that they’re betting the Democrats will switch candidates at the last minute. Have they actually paid attention to politics?
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/02/13/get-used-to-it-biden-isnt-going-anywhere-00141047
Winston Smith needs to get busy.
Doesn't matter.
Joe's senility was apparent to any idiot. Not so Donnie.
turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
And yet, you shilled for Joe until he got coup-ed by the DNC in favor of Stupid Kamala who somehow manages to make you look like a midwit.
Well, turd lies.
LOL, all of a sudden the hicklib pederast is pretending that he wasn't relentelessly shilling for his fellow Democrat Joe Biden for the last 4 years.
"Both President Donald Trump, 74, and former Vice President Joe Biden, 77, are "super-agers" overwhelmingly likely to live beyond their mid-80s—but a new study finds Biden has a higher probability of outliving his younger opponent."
Being shot at has a pretty dramatic effect on life expectancy.
overwhelmingly likely to live beyond their mid-80s
Don't these people even covid?
Immigrants, prisoners - gotta have that cheap labor, Democrats.
Kamala Harris’ A.G. Office Tried to Keep Inmates Locked Up for Cheap Labor
https://www.thedailybeast.com/kamala-harris-ag-office-tried-to-keep-inmates-locked-up-for-cheap-labor
Something something putting you back in chains...
It's in her family legacy.
The GOTV campaign for GenZ is gonna look even worse when the consultants start spending big donor money.
Biden administration ADMITS flying 320,000 migrants secretly into the U.S. to reduce the number of crossings at the border has national security 'vulnerabilities'
A lawsuit reveals Biden's CBP is refusing to disclose airports where it is flying undocumented aliens from other countries
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13155765/biden-illegal-migrant-flying-program-national-security-vulnerability.html
This story sounds like made-up wingnut bullshit.
Tried to find credible news source and couldn't.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
"This story sounds like made-up wingnut bullshit."
It does sound like a demented fantasy, but it's true and you Democrats are lunatics.
Not a fantasy, but a conspiracy. The means Democrats-media will deny it four a couple of months, and then admit the truth (but dismiss the significance).
“Tried to find credible news source”
Also, how is the Daily Fail less credible a source than MSDNC and The Bulwark and all the other retarded places you’ve posted here?
""MSDNC"'
No kidding.
Lew Rockwell calls the Daily Mail the world’s greatest English language newspaper. I think because they show pictures of what’ s actually happening, instead of interpreting it to fit the narrative. One example was the French gilets jaunes protests. Lots of pictures of fires in their coverage.
Founded in 1896, it is the highest circulation daily paper in the UK.
And being banned by Wikipedia as a primary source should be considered a badge of honor.
And being banned by Wikipedia as a primary source should be considered a badge of honor.
WTF? Wikipedia itself is banned as a primary source. A "ban" from Wikipedia is completely devoid of any meaning.
And yet Wikipedia allows smears from the SPLC, a Democratic Party super-PAC, as a source.
Yeah, we know, you hicklib pederast, anything that verifiably makes your side look bad is "made up wingnut bullshit."
Maybe you can talk about how your fellow left-wing pedophile Kris Tyson didn't actually groom minors.
Wsj: Skip Breakfast To Save Money, You Silly Poors
http://www.wopular.com/wsj-skip-breakfast-save-money-you-silly-poors
Wow, that website.
I remember the 90s.
Harris got her political start fucking Willie Brown. She was handed a nomination and campaign war chest by Biden.
Everything she got she was given by men.
Hillary would not have been 2016 nominee if she hadn't fucked Bill.
Hillary would have no political career at all if it wasn't for Bill, much less the 2016 nom.
Ya, I had this conversation with quite a few braindead "it was her turn!!!" dems back then. The constant refrain and branding was "most qualified to be president in the history of candidates"
All of those qualifications basically being handed to her, a product of her marriage to Bill, or the DNC anointing her.
Gov wife, first lady, and cred to run for NY senator, all name recognition for being the wife of a popular D president. Would be like Michelle running in Illinois, an easy lay up.
Secy of State was a gift for eventually bowing out against Obama, realizing he had won the war, and that it would tee her up for "her turn"
Prez nomination was a coronation/anointment, the DNC handed her the nomination on a platter.
The lady would have been next to a no one had she not been Bill's wife, and the dems hate admitting that fact because it ruins their girl boss fantasy. They also know its true about Kamala and why they are having a spasm about her being called Madam Hawk Tuah
She had to get the DNC to torpedo Bernie fucking Sanders. She was nobody.
Trudeau’s lack of proper forest management burns a goodly part of Jasper to the ground. An utter shame as the town and area is beautiful.
https://x.com/martyupnorth_2/status/1816313491420242120?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
In California the trees are dying from tree beetles because there are to many trees since they curtailed logging, not because of global warming. i know it sounds odd but anytime you let something grow to the extend we have pest or other tree blight will kick in. we have seen it before with chestnut trees, pear trees and now it may happen with banana trees. blame the greenies for all of it
Same cause for the increased forest fires. The logging companies managed the forests, keeping the undergrowth ("kindling") in check. Neither the state nor the federal governments do.
The other big factor is a century of putting out all fires, natural and man-caused. Unless most western forests burn every decade or two (and usually lightly) then the undergrowth and debris build up, and the next fire is catastrophic.
Yeah, it's funny how nature has a way of balancing things out on its own irrespective of whatever man might do. Let forests grow out of control? Well, now the beetles have a buffet to gorge on and forest fires will clear them out!
All the Liberals on X are furiously typing away and trying to blame this of Alberta's conservative Premier Danielle Smith instead of Justin, but Jasper is a national park and its firefighting is managed by the federal government rather than the province.
Don't bring facts to a narrative party.
""Park managers should have conducted some controlled burns and cleared dead forests.""
I've heard controlled burns working is a right- wing talking point.
So, if "brat" means living irresponsibly with no care for consequences, all funded by OPM, then not only is Kamalama brat, the whole modern Democratic Party movement is brat.
I suggest they get out of politics and live their dreams on social media, just like the cool kids.
'"California Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an executive order Thursday to direct state agencies on how to remove homeless encampments, a month after a Supreme Court ruling allowing cities to enforce bans on sleeping outside in public spaces," reports the Associated Press.'
Is the Chinese Pooh Bear coming back?
Meanwhile, the gay guys of New York City, who received the news of Biden pulling out
Are we even doing 'phrasing' any more?
+1 thanks, Dodge!
Trump shooter social media posts could easily have been made by any one of several posters here.
"The reason all the deaths are down is because you are in stuck in your house."
"Actually the executive order allows an easier path to US citizenship therefore no longer making them illegals and allowing children to join their already legalized immigrant parents in the US."
"first of all Biden executive orders don't incentivize human trafficking as human traffickers aren't interested in citizenships, likewise the majority of illegal immigrants are not criminals and in fact some studies(such as the one linked below) show lower rates of crime committed by these individuals, it is also unclear if the extensive path to citizenship is in fact effective at routing out potential bad actors hence why there is a review of that system."
"Thats funny because the first order mandates a reuniting of any families separated at the border, the 2nd and 3rd orders a review of trumps immigration policies and other previous policies. However his order doesn't actually open borders or reduce the authority of border patrol, or anything that would substantially reduce BP effectiveness."
I've been wondering what commenter hasn't been around since the assassination attempt.
+1
We know it's not sarc because he only replies to middle-right accounts but then, doesn't turn around and purport to be non-partisan.
"California Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an executive order Thursday to direct state agencies on how to remove homeless encampments, a month after a Supreme Court ruling allowing cities to enforce bans on sleeping outside in public spaces," reports the Associated Press.
Something's going on here in mainstream Democratic politics-- at the local level. It's like someone sent out a memo and said, "Take away any ammunition that can be used against us in November".
I noted yesterday in a thread that a sitting Seattle City Council member, speaking into a microphone, to the public, with cameras on boldly claimed that "Defund the police is dead" and that it was a failed policy and failed ideology. For Seattle local politics, the impact of that statement can't be understated. That would be like the national Democratic party saying, "We're no longer pro-choice". That's how yuge that is. Someone somewhere is starting to read the room.
Someone somewhere is starting to read the room.
If it's not Joe, then it's probably Kamala. I mean, who else could it be?
"Boy, Kamala Harris sure knows how to appeal to Rust Belt normies"
How much you wanna bet Ru Paul is offered a spot in her cabinet? Perhaps as (Trans)portation secretary since Buttegage will be VP.
Secretary of Nuclear Waste Regulation and Luggage Theft
that joker was ludicrously tragic.
>>”kamala IS brat,” tweeted singer Charli XCX
abandon hope, all ye who read HnR
I'm stupider for having read that.
>>"The internet is going crazy for Harris' campaign,"
quick, somebody get the internet a write-in ballot.
Does the internet have a place to park an 18-wheeler?
Or will they just print their own?
>>"Brat" is someone who ... walks around with a "pack of cigs, a Bic lighter and a strappy white top with no bra."
in Dallas we call that Garland.
>>The Department of Sanitation is trying to get New Yorkers to become snitches.
does Johnny Sack know about this?
How uncool does it make me that I have never heard of Charli XCX?
I was helping a client dig for files & came across a box full of 70s albums he let me keep the Rick James ones - Fire it Up, Come Get It! & Street Songs
Makes me want to do software revision in Roman Numerals. Both more classy and more hip than this Arabic Numeral bullshit.
100 minus 10 plus 10 is still 100.
XCX = C - X + X = C
That depends. Are you 20 or 60?
What's funny is that all generation labels are/were media/advertising fabrications from the beginning. And are just used to fabricate 'cool' across the generation that currently matters to advertisers. Cool doesn't cross generations. Not the word and not the notion
Last I heard of her was 2014 when she infected us with the boom clap.
"XCX" seems like someone doesn't even know Roman numerals. You could just use the C.
>>Boy, Kamala Harris sure knows how to appeal to Rust Belt normies:
shhhhhhh. let the drag race begin.
What I think is funny is people think she needs to appeal to rust belt normies. It's like they've never heard of fortification.
the margin of fraud is strong in this one.
They're not called "swing states" because they're full of swingers.
"shhhhhhh. let the drag race begin."
A thousand Bud Light tranny beer cans.
If she can gain traction with younger voters in those states, and/or meaningfully affect youth voter turnout, then that's helpful.
Does anyone actually care about 'the youth vote'? I mean, unless something has really changed in the United States 'the youth' simply...don't vote at all. So even if 100% of 'the youth' 'support' Kamala, that probably equates to very few actual votes.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but that's been a trend since before I was alive and will probably continue long after I'm gone.
As Libertarians learned long ago, young people don't vote.
Old people vote.
The youth vote isn’t really good for anything other than providing the appearance of popular consensus for the marxists in the mass media to trumpet. As you said, they’ve never turned out in large enough numbers to really matter at the actual ballot box. If anything, their generations-long lack of participation is a great argument to repeal the 26th Amendment and go back to treating 21 as the age of majority. That Amendment was only passed as a sop to the liberal Boomers and has no substantive reason for its existence.
Making it all the more curious why a campaign would focus on that demographic when it objectively hurts them with the rest of their demographics.
It's just a weird choice to run with this, although I'm tempted to suspect it's because they have no idea how to market cackles to any normies who might actually vote. This basically fell in their lap, so they were like 'sure, this will make good enough filler until we have a clue what to do'.
Making it all the more curious why a campaign would focus on that demographic when it objectively hurts them with the rest of their demographics.
A very long history of youth worship going back to the 50s. Older people love the idea that they're considered "hip" by teenagers, because they believe it makes them more credible with the culture at large. Even if "Rock the Vote" was a completely waste of effort by MTV, it scared Kemp Republicans enough after Clinton was elected to focus mostly on fiscal and administrative conservative issues and push social conservativism to the side, since they assumed the latter would continue supporting them regardless. And until Trump came along, that was the case.
go back to treating 21 as the age of majority
I would make it 25.
a sop to the liberal Boomers
It was introduced as a way to pacify anti-draft protesters.
The youth vote helped Clinton and Obama. But more so Obama.
If the youth didn't vote, the dems wouldn't want to lower the voting age.
My recollection is that they might have 'helped' by a few percentage points out of the total, which ultimately didn't matter one way or the other. They could have stayed home and the result would have likely been the same.
The majority of them simply don't vote. Advertising wisdom targets that demo because they spend money and is a good value for the buck you spend on it. In politics, not so much.
Gerald Pardon-Nixon Ford and Dumbass Dole said pretty much the same thing during the second Libertarian Party presidential campaign.
Not saying 'I told you so' but I kind of did.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nyu-professor-trump-hitler-will-use-assassination-attempt-authoritarian-goals
I remember that. I repeated it to a couple of people, some of whom thought it was egregious hyperbole. *sigh*
a boost to Trump’s victimhood persona
Uh...when you get shot, aren't you an ACTUAL victim?
Trump’s best strategy to win might just be to go camp in his basement and release a short, pre-recorded video now and then. (This is the Biden strategy that produced a record 81 million votes.)
Then sit back and watch on the big screen as Harris makes a fool of herself and shows herself to be out of touch with mainstream voters.
https://apnews.com/article/harris-rupaul-drag-race-all-stars-ce7d00a8bc94eb6fd39382b9f59d9ddc
https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris-team-claims-success-immigration-what-does-her-record-show-1930031
Yup, it’s working.
(Looking at the opening photo)
Are those two Brats the newest members of the women's swim team?
I just stumbled upon this X post by Joseph Mallozzi, the writer/producer for some of my favorite sci-fi series (Stargate, Dark Matter, etc.). He satirizes the assassination attempt as a Hollywood movie plot submitted to him, but points out how poorly written it is with so many unbelievable plot points. IMO, it's worth a read:
https://x.com/BaronDestructo/status/1813725970915791217
Then he does a follow up a week later that includes some of the newer details and Biden dropping out in odd fashion:
https://x.com/BaronDestructo/status/1815538664337743940
Repost this tomorrow, with the whole post. It really shows the insanity we are living in right now.
A woman who says she is going to vote for Harris because 'she is a black woman' gets a quick wake-up lesson.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1816639361858810171
The Jesus Caucus Lebensborn BDM harridan is back with a full shrewdness of Trumpanzees in the jeering section. Still, people wonder what's that smell that attracts so many Klan, Army of God and Vatican-impelled girl-bullying brainwashees to soil the pages of Reason with flung ordure.
Harris is chasing hard after a demo that is notorious for not voting?
WORKS FOR ME!
Hilarious!! The MAGA minions, female edition, have unsheathed their kitty kat claws to attack Kamala Harris, young women, single women, "the gays", and women in general.