Biden Brags That 'the United States Is Not at War' As He Bombs Yemen
The wars aren’t over. America is still fighting—directly and indirectly—in the Middle East, Africa, and Eastern Europe.

President Joe Biden called himself "the first president this century to report to the American people that the United States is not at war anywhere in the world" in a speech on Wednesday night. Less than an hour before Biden spoke those words, the U.S. military had announced that it was bombing Yemen again.
"In the past 24 hours, U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) forces successfully destroyed two Iranian-backed Houthi missiles on launchers in a Houthi-controlled area of Yemen," the U.S. military command responsible for the Middle East and Central Asia declared shortly before Biden's speech began. "It was determined these weapons presented an imminent threat to U.S., coalition forces, and merchant vessels in the region."
After completing the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, Biden took credit for ending "the longest war in American history," what he called a "forever war." Yet the Biden administration has extended other U.S. forever wars—and introduced U.S. forces into new ones.
When Biden first ordered airstrikes on Yemen's Houthi movement in January, it was the first direct U.S. attack on the Houthis ever, and the first airstrike on Yemen by any force in two years. The U.S. had previously brokered a truce between the Houthi government in Sanaa and the rival Saudi-backed government in Aden.
But as war broke out in Gaza last year, the Houthis announced that they would attack Israeli-linked shipping in solidarity with the Palestinian cause. Foreign ships began avoiding the Red Sea off the coast of Yemen, a key international waterway, and Biden tried to reopen it by bombing the Houthis.
Asked by reporters whether the airstrikes were working, Biden gave a formula for endless war. "Well, when you say 'working,' are they stopping the Houthis? No. Are they going to continue? Yes," he said.
U.S. forces have also taken fire elsewhere in the Middle East due to the war in Gaza. Two weeks after U.S. airstrikes on Yemen began, Iraqi guerrillas killed three U.S. soldiers on the Jordanian-Syrian border with a drone strike. (It was part of a wave of dozens of attacks motivated by U.S. military support for Israel.) Biden bombed Iraqi militia sites in retaliation.
And older U.S. wars in the region continue to rage. Although both Biden and his predecessor Donald Trump have done victory laps, the Islamic State group is still around. In June 2024, the U.S. military assassinated a senior Islamic State group leader in Syria. The month before, it did the same in Somalia.
The Islamic State group isn't the only force that the U.S. is bombing in Somalia, a place where most Americans don't even know their country is at war. U.S. forces are fighting to prop up the Somali government against al-Shabab, another Islamist rebel group. U.S. Africa Command announced 15 airstrikes against al-Shabab in 2023 and six airstrikes this year.
That's not even counting U.S. proxy wars. Washington is providing a steady flow of weapons and intelligence to Ukraine and Israel, most of it at the American taxpayer's expense. While American fingers are not on the triggers and American personnel are not taking fire in Ukraine and Gaza—at least not yet—the Biden administration also owns those wars.
At the NATO summit in Washington earlier this month, U.S. officials co-signed a statement that Ukraine was on an "irreversible" path to joining the alliance. In other words, American troops may be pledged to defend Ukraine in a future war.
"We'll keep rallying a coalition of proud nations to stop [Russian President Vladimir] Putin from taking over Ukraine and doing more damage. We'll keep NATO strong," Biden said in his Wednesday night address. "I'll make it more powerful and more united than any time in all our history. Keep doing the same for allies in the Pacific."
Biden, like Trump, wants to have his cake and eat it too. He wants to take advantage of anti-war sentiment in the American public without being seen as compromising with rival powers or retreating from foreign conflicts. Biden's pitch is pretty similar to Trump's: "peace through strength." And when he can't deliver on that promise, he confuses and deceives the public.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
To be completely fair to Biden...this is just anti-piracy. We aren't so much at war with the pirates as we are exterminating them. Pirates have been recognized as "enemies of all mankind" for literally thousands of years. Using our navy to protect the free flow of commerce is a 100% justified use of the military.
It would be nice if the US was not the ONLY navy that was capable of fighting large scale pirate activities on the high seas, but the British can't even keep their TWO aircraft carriers seaworthy. Britannia Rules The Waves is just a relic of the past.
This.
Libertarians don't like the idea of "Team America World Police", but the alternative isn't other countries "stepping up". Darkness and barbarity are the natural state of things and if you let it fester you just end up with a world that is less safe and less free. It's not an unlimited carte blanche to shoot everything forever, but doing what you can is a legitimate use of the military. The extent to which we can and should is always up for debate, obviously, but it's certainly nonzero.
And if you’re pro-free markets and free trade, you have to be anti-piracy. Allowing the free exchange of goods and commodities to flow is a legitimate usage of government. It’s not fair at all that pretty much nobody in the world is helping shoulder the costs of maintaining the security of international shipping, but it still is worth doing.
"And if you’re pro-free markets and free trade"
That's not why Biden is bombing Yemen. Yemen is being bombed because it's the poorest nation in Asia and is incapable of retaliating. Those who supply and enable Yemen - Russia, China, Iran and others - are a different kettle of fish.
I see you subscribe to chubby's neo1970democrat school of international affairs.
I see, once more, you have nothing interesting to add to my wise words.
Oh, okay. We bomb all poor nations all the time, like Haiti and Madagascar and Malawi.
Oh wait, we’re coming none of those? Perhaps it’s because there’s a bit of a reason we were provoked by the Houthis.
"Perhaps it’s because there’s a bit of a reason we were provoked by the Houthis."
Certainly. They aim to disrupt Israel's genocide. They've told us so, and promised to stop when the genocide stops. But don't worry, when Haiti takes measures to defend Gaza, we'll bomb them too. For Freedom!
mNaziboy, all Nazi, all the time.
Better a nazi than a moron.
But you're both.
Maybe I'll convert to Zionism. Go for the trifecta.
Really. Biden looks at a map and says "lets bomb poor people". The military goes - sounds great let's hit Yemen.
Can't be because of anything else huh? Once again, you don't have facts.
Yemen is number 6. When do we bomb the rest?
Mozambique ($1,649 | GDP-PPP per Capita) ...
Niger ($1,675 | GDP-PPP per Capita) ...
Malawi ($1,712 | GDP-PPP per Capita) ...
Liberia ($1,882 | GDP-PPP per Capita) ...
Madagascar ($1,979 | GDP-PPP per Capita) ...
Yemen ($1,996 | GDP-PPP per Capita)
Numbers 1 through 5 are not Asian countries. Yemen is an Asian country. The poorest country in Asian, and that's why Biden thinks he can bomb it with impunity. They can't retaliate. Yemen's funders and suppliers, China, Iran, North Korea etc are a different story.
Libertarians don’t like the idea of “Team America World Police”
That's because the "Team America World Police" concept touted by Al Gore in the "unipolar world" of the 1990s was about enforcing UN declarations, not combatting piracy.
I imagine some libertarians might argue that if, say, China-based ships are being victimized by piracy that that's a China problem, not a US one, but I don't think any would argue that the US shouldn't respond to attacks on US-based ships.
"the US shouldn’t respond to attacks on US-based ships."
Panama, Liberia & Marshall Islands, the three most popular flags of convenience, account for 40% of world tonnage.
International shipping is kind of a dirty business, yes.
Thank the Houthis for their fine efforts at cleaning it up, to say nothing of drawing a line in the sand on Israeli genocide.
Soon, America's navy will become a relic. Aircraft carriers especially make excellent targets for hypersonic missiles.
Wouldn't wanna be on one when that happens.....
Carrier groups are a relic UNLESS you're a country that can unleash nuclear hell on any country that attacks your carriers.
Can't wait for Sullum's "Trump Lies About His Antiwar Record" article.
Didn't Petti already do that article?:
Being knee-jerk "anti-war" is a naive, foolish position that has the potential to make the world a more dangerous and less free place. One can make arguments against whatever conflict is happening on an individual basis, but opposing going after a faction taking potshots at international merchant ships in support of another organization that committed some serious war crimes is not a hill to die on.
I'm anti-war, but sometimes I'm pro-punitive expedition.
It's all about clearly defining your objectives.
""It’s all about clearly defining your objectives.""
Not what I would expect from Word Salad Harris.
"but opposing going after a faction taking potshots at international merchant ships in support of another organization that committed some serious war crimes is not a hill to die on."
Unless that faction is Russia, China, North Korea or anyone else capable of inflicting damage on the US.
China should join us in defending freedom of navigation in the Red Sea.
You sound like Biden on a good day. We're not defending freedom. We're defending genocide.
You're an idiot.
You're the one aping Biden. Or would you prefer Trump?
The Houthi s are genociding merchant shipping?
Only those who don't want to take the scenic route around the Cape of Good Hope.
Being knee-jerk “anti-war” is a naive, foolish position that has the potential to make the world a more dangerous and less free place.
Dude. You’re talking to Reason “War doesn’t work, nation building doesn’t work, tariffs don’t work, sanctions don’t work, targeted strikes on neutral soil don’t work, first safe haven policies don’t work, cabotage rules don't work… pretty much anything short of air dropping pallets of cash on their leaders and shoveling bucket loads of benefits on people fleeing their regimes and paving a path for them across the border at a point of their choosing doesn’t work.” Magazine, knee-jerk, anti-war, naive, and foolish is just the tip of their ice berg.
“War doesn’t work, nation building doesn’t work, tariffs don’t work, sanctions don’t work, targeted strikes on neutral soil don’t work, first safe haven policies don’t work… pretty much anything short of air dropping pallets of cash on their leaders and shoveling bucket loads of benefits on people fleeing their regimes..."
They used to work. But a failing empire, a paper tiger, and chickens returning to the roost have a way of spoiling things. It's a brave new world out there.
Ron Paul was right. Washington's foreign interventionism and military adventurism have been one disaster after another, are soon coming to an end.
The foreign policies that were driven by Trotskyite zionist neo-cons.
These pole smokers think we're still living in the 50s.
Be fair - nation-building doesn't work.
Sorry… lobbing a couple of missiles and sending drones in to spy on a bunch of religious extremist wackos isn’t a war. Where are your standards?
A war is like what the libertarian paradise of Russia is doing to Ukraine. You can enjoy amazing subways and shop at stores with bread as long as you’re ok with having Putin’s military grind up your first born in an Eastern European wasteland. Since Russia is now the bulwark against the woke Kansas City faggots in DC there’s probably more than a few of you that would take that bargain.
""as long as you’re ok with having Putin’s military grind up your first born ""
Who are you talking to? Our first born are not going there.
Btw, Biden has supported our first born being ground in the M.E. for decades. Longer than W, Obama or Clinton.
Fuck off, Buttplug, and quit sockpuppeting.
FOAD, steaming pile of TDS-addled shit.
Why are you still a Biden guy? Doesn't it seem a little racist at this point?
Losers back a quitter.
Shrike IS extremely racist.
Surrendering Afghanistan isn't the flex he thinks it is.
Maybe Jill should have planned the exit a little better.
>>"Well, when you say 'working,' are they stopping the Houthis? No. Are they going to continue? Yes,"
B keeps telling you jornolists the straight truth but you don't see it.
"""the first president this century to report to the American people that the United States is not at war anywhere in the world"""
We just supply those who are.
We current powder keg in the M.E. has us closer to WW3 than when Biden took office. All the Iranian backed forces need to invade Israel is the belief that no one will intervene. Sadly the much of the world seems to have given in to the idea people who kidnap people and use them as human shields are not the bad guys.
"All the Iranian backed forces need to invade Israel is the belief that no one will intervene. "
Because the Iranian backed forces are ultimately backed by Russia, China, Syria, Iraq, North Korea as well as Iran. The US doesn't want to get involved, but aside from funding, encouraging and arming proxies like Israel, al Qaeda, Ukraine, etc.
Under President Trump Iran was pretty calm. That is because the Trump Administration starved Iran of money by strictly enforcing sanctions against Iran and pursuing domestic energy policies that kept oil prices low. By doing so Iran didn't have the financial resources to aid terrorists like Hamas and the Houthis or develop nukes.
Btw this also explains why Russia didn't invade Ukraine during Trump's Administration since by keeping oil prices low Russia was limited financially and more vulnerable to potential sanctions.
"Under President Trump Iran was pretty calm. "
Pretty calm by thwarting US sanctions making billions from oil sales, funding and supporting Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, and cementing ties with Russia and China. Those were the days.
Pretty calm by thwarting US sanctions making billions from oil sales, funding and supporting Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, and cementing ties with Russia and China. Those were the days.
Uh, as opposed to removing sanctions and flying in pallets of cash to Iran? They were telling the truth, you really are a parody account, aren’t you?
mtrueman has as much as admitted that he's a parody account.
"Uh, as opposed to removing sanctions and flying in pallets of cash to Iran? "
Do you know how much Iran rakes in from sanction busting oil sales? I suggest you look into it.
During the Trump Administration was Iran able to fully fund Hamas, Hezbollah or the Houthis? Were they able to advance their nuclear ambitions? The answer to both questions is no, no they couldn't fund the terrorist groups and no their nuclear weapons program wasn't advancing. Under Trump peace was advancing with the Abraham Accords.
Under the Biden Maladministration tens of billions of dollars was released to Iran and hundreds of millions was sent to Hamas and predictably the terrorist supporting nation and the terrorist groups began acting up.
Peace and order under the Trump Administration and chaos and war under the Biden Maladministration.
Do you know how much Iran rakes in from sanction busting oil sales? I suggest you look into it. Trump years, Biden years, whatever floats your boat.
"no they couldn’t fund the terrorist groups and no their nuclear weapons program wasn’t advancing. "
Sure they could fund various resistance groups, Hezbollah from Lebanon, Hamas from Gaza, and Houthis from Yemen. They are swimming in cash from sanction busting sales of oil. Something like $50 billion a year, if memory serves, whether Trump or Biden occupies the white house. Makes no difference to them. Six of one, as the saying goes. The Great Satan.
The weapons program occurs deep under mountains, not only nuclear technology, but they are big on missiles and drones too. They are supplying Russia with them today, capitalizing on the closer ties that only grew closer still under Trump.
"Under the Biden Maladministration tens of billions of dollars was released to Iran "
Where did you get that figure? I come up with less than a paltry 2 billion. Hardly worth the fuss.
https://apnews.com/united-states-government-fd4113419276444eba1d2a46d5c29752
I tell you tens of billions year in year out during the dear leader's term in the white house. You can't deny it.
Under the Trump Administration sanctions were reinstated in 2018 and Iran's GDP actually contracted in 2018 and 2019. Iran was barely getting by.
Under the Biden Maladministration Iran was given access to $6 billion as part of a hostage deal and immediately began waiving the sanctions to the tune of almost $60 billion and in 2023 Iran's GDP actually grew by 5.3%. The Biden Maladministration also restored US aid ( that Trump had stopped)to Hamas to
the tune of several hundred million dollars.
The facts are the facts.
"Under the Trump Administration sanctions were reinstated in 2018 and Iran’s GDP actually contracted in 2018 and 2019. "
The sanctions never stopped Iran from selling oil, and encourage self reliance and closer ties with Russia and China. Is that a record you think worth defending? Trump apparently thought that by murdering an Iranian general, the Iranians would comply with America's orders. Do you think that worked out well? Do you think they stopped selling oil, researching weapons, funding resistance and supplying groups because of Trump?
"in 2023 Iran’s GDP actually grew by 5.3%."
Russia and China are also doing well, and so will Iran, to the extent that their economies are linked. And they've been deeply linked since at least the Trump years and nothing Trump did managed to buck the trend. You're arguing like some kind of partisan shill, a kind of 'when you're a Jet, you're a Jet all the way, from your first cigarette to your last dying day' kind of guy. Very loyal and an admirable team player, but not very interesting.
* Jet - NYC street gang, West Side Story.
So you don't really dispute the fact that after Trump reimposed sanctions on Iran that Iran's GDP contracted. You merely state Iran was still getting money. Let me give an analogy. A CEO gets fired from his multi million dollar job and goes to work at Burger King. Yes he is still getting money but much less and his spending is now constrained. That was Iran under Trump. Iran under the Biden Maladministration is that the CEO has been reinstated to his job and been given a hefty bonus.
I repeat that under Trump Iran was financially limited and was thus limited in it's support of terrorists. Under Trump there were the Abraham Accords that strengthened peace efforts in the Middle East. Under the Biden Maladministration we have had the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel leading to the Gaza War, we have the Houthis attacking shipping, we have Hezbollah attacking Israel and Iran's nuclear weapon program is advancing rapidly.
Simply the facts.
"So you don’t really dispute the fact that after Trump reimposed sanctions on Iran that Iran’s GDP contracted. "
Was the goal of the sanctions to contract Iran's GDP, immiserating their lower and middle classes? If yes, they were a success and Trump can be proud. If the goal of the sanctions was to stop Iran from funding and supplying Hezbollah etc, stymie their progress in weapons development, stop their oil exports, and frustrate their diplomatic efforts with Russia and China? If yes, they were a failure and Trump should hang his head in shame. A so should you for celebrating his pathetic accomplishments.
"Under Trump there were the Abraham Accords that strengthened peace efforts in the Middle East."
No, they precipitated the Al Aqsa Flood, the most violent outbreak of resistance against Israeli occupation in history. Thousands die, and again you can only celebrate Trump's role in his failed and ill conceived peace initiative.
"we have the Houthis attacking shipping,"
You are prepared to deny or justify genocide. The Houthis aren't. The poorest nation in Asia. Some hundred thousand Yemenis starved to death under Trump's watch while Trump cheered it on. A disgustingly immoral, a criminal act of negligence, and even active support.
The goal was to deprive Iran from the resources to support terrorism and in that the sanctions were quite successful. Do you think that is a reasonable goal?
The sanctions were successful in targeting the weakest members of Iranian society, depriving children of the medicine the need and so on. They failed at preventing Iran to develop weapons like drones and long range missiles that are killing Israelis and Ukrainians, failed at breaking ties between Iran and groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, and a host of similar groups in Iraq, even some some from Afghanistan, all armed, financed and supported by Iran. Failed at preventing Iran from diplomatic advances and alliances with China and Russia. The fact that you're willing to sing the praises of these failures and paint them as successes just indicates your partisan love of Trump and disregards the horrific results of his initiatives and failures to respond to circumstances.
So why was Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah pretty much silent under Trump? I don't recall hearing about the Houthis attacking shipping while Trump was POTUS, and while Hamas fired rockets the number was far below other times and Hezbollah also was pretty quiet during this time. Only when Biden gave Iran money and waived sanctions and only when Biden restored Hamas's funding did things spiral out of control. Only then did the Houthis start attacking shipping and only then did the October 7 terrorist assault begin .
So once again under Trump the Middle East was improving and becoming more peaceful and under Biden it feels more like WW3 is a strong possibility.
"So why was Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah pretty much silent under Trump?"
Hamas was undoubtedly preparing for the battle ahead. Have you heard of the Great March of Return? It happened during Trump's watch, in the spring of 2018. Thousands of Gazans gathered to protest their plight. They were unarmed. Israeli snipers killed over 200 and seriously wounded many more. This happened while Trump was in Jerusalem. What was his response to this horrific massacre? You follow Trump a lot more closely than I do. I don't think he had anything to say about it. Am I wrong?
In any case, hundreds of unarmed Gazans shot. Hamas spent the next few years preparing for Al Aqsa Flood, stock piling weapons and ammo, formulating plans. Hezbollah and Houthis weren't involved. They only entered the picture after Hamas initiated the attack.
"Only when Biden gave Iran money and waived sanctions and only when Biden restored Hamas’s funding did things spiral out of control."
Israeli military snipers murdering hundreds of unarmed civilians is your idea of being under control? It's precisely these sorts of criminal actions that enrage Palestinians and result in armed resistance as saw erupt in Oct last year.
"So once again under Trump the Middle East was improving "
It wasn't improving for the Palestinians. They saw what was happening. Saudi Arabia, Israel and the US all negotiating over their heads, ignoring them. It wasn't the first time, either. During the Reagan years, the same thing, the US, Israel and various Arab nations involved in negotiations freezing out Palestinians. The PFLP, I believe (Hamas didn't exist at the time), seized an Italian cruise ship, the Achille Lauro, and murdered and old and infirm American Jew. You might even remember the traumatic events. The upshot is that shortly after, Reagan capitulated and officially recognized the PLO, and they've had a seat at the table ever since. And Palestinians learned an important lesson - that violence is the only language the US and Israel understand.
By the democrat 'let's use strict definitions when it helps our cause' rule, we haven't "been at war" since September 2, 1945.
That covers a lot of presidents.
We have never been at war. King George abandoned North America in the name of equity.
That wasn't biden doing the bragging.
What?
Joe Biden lied?
That can't be right.
It must be a typo.
"That's not even counting U.S. proxy wars. "
I'm curious about the terror attacks on Russia in the past few months. If we sponsor terror attacks, that's not really a war, is it?
Well, the US has (sort of) declared a war on terrorism. Which I don't think ever really ended.
Terrorism, like Antifa, is just an idea.
The US government is also just an idea.
"Which I don’t think ever really ended."
Just ask the Russians if you're not sure.
Maybe he was talking about Achmed, the dead terrorist.
https://www.facebook.com/JeffDunham/videos/some-of-the-best-of-achmed-jeff-dunham/1173117609718298/
Don't know why I should give a shit about Biden anymore. Kamala is in charge and I'm assured she's anti war in a murky sort of way.
Would be funny if the WH press corps kept referring to Harris as President Harris when asking questions.
It would be a mistake to think she is in charge of even her own staff.
Like Biden, she will do as she is told.
I watched part of his speech but the one thing I paid attention to was his demeanor. His eyes were fully dilated and he never blinked once. He was like a zombie repeating words from a teleprompter. It was very spooky to say the least.
Obviously, he was juiced to the max. Who knows what they juiced him with but it must have been like lightning. Can't imagine what it was like for him when he crashed.
Anyone who believed anything that decrepit old zombie said is a fool and deserves whatever they get.
Patterns of force
https://youtu.be/YSBVKyJbM6o?si=zbjWPxwWd6LFwdT7
Oh yeah, swallow that nut Jefferson Paul!
You must have me confused with an 8 year-old boy, if you want me to swallow your nut. SPB2, based on the type of dark-net, homosexual, pedophilic porn you posted a link to a few years ago, I don't think I fit the profile of your victims.
Graer, kuckland, crackrocks, cum make me airtight!
Don't look at me, record this shit! And spunk on my face.
Small wars are bigger than huge ones. And huge ones happen when you let aggression go unchecked.
With that said, the Houthis are more a piracy thing. But even then notice how they don't bother ships from the Axis of Evil? Just Western ones? Because ultimately Islam is at war with the West, Hide your heads in a hole, import millions of immigrants from the Middle East, but that's not going to change that they want to rule he world under Shariah law.
"With that said, the Houthis are more a piracy thing."
You're not paying attention. Houthis have stated explicitly and often their aim is to thwart Israel's genocide in Gaza by disrupting their economy. And they also stated they would stop when Israel stops, and in fact have stopped during the 10 day ceasefire in November last year.
"Because ultimately Islam is at war with the West,"
If you pray hard, you'll be OK.
their aim is to thwart Israel’s genocide in Gaza by disrupting their economy.
And that's why they're targeting only ships coming from or going to Israel? You're an idiot.
"You’re an idiot."
Maybe, but at least I'm not targeting shipping laden with goods bound for Israel.
Can't just say Biden is a lying sack of crap. You have to bring Trump into every article.
The only war that Reason called about was the war on Drugs. Drugs won.