Republicans Say Joe Biden Should Quit the Presidency Right Now
"If Joe Biden is not fit to run for President, he is not fit to serve as President," said House Speaker Mike Johnson.

President Joe Biden is no longer running for reelection. After facing weeks of mounting pressure from donors, the media, and party elites following his disastrous debate performance, Biden formally exited the race on Sunday—and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as his successor.
Biden may be dropping out, but he is not resigning the presidency and intends to finish his term. Many Republicans are criticizing this move, suggesting that if the president is not capable of running for reelection, he should not be doing the job presently.
"If Joe Biden is not fit to run for President, he is not fit to serve as President," wrote House Speaker Mike Johnson on X. "He must resign the office immediately."
This opinion was echoed by Rep. Elise Stefanik (R–N.Y.), Rep. Nancy Mace (R–S.C.), Sen. Josh Hawley (R–Mo.), and many, many other Republicans.
Republicans are obviously motivated by their own political interest here; that said, the question of Biden's fitness right now is not unreasonable. Biden isn't getting out of the race because he suddenly decided four years on the job is enough: He is being forced out because his party has lost confidence in his cognitive ability, his physical health, and his capacity to speak in complete sentences. President of the U.S. is a very demanding job.
Team Biden can respond with the claim that Biden is fully capable right now of finishing his term, but should no longer commit to serving for an additional four years. They can also say that Biden is able to be president, but the additional job of campaigning is too much of a strain. Whether these arguments prove persuasive remains to be seen. Biden's statement announcing his exit from the race did not cite a specific reason. He merely said that "it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down." That wording was probably designed to avoid giving credence to those calling for his immediate resignation.
Sen. Chris Coons (D–Del.) told reporters that calls for Biden to resign were disrespectful of his accomplishments and reckless given the challenges on the global stage. Of course, Republicans could counter the latter point by asserting that the conflicts in Europe and the Middle East necessitate the U.S. having a president who is in full command of his mental faculties. Virtually the entire Democratic Party has implicitly conceded that Biden doesn't fit that description.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
“…disrespectful of his accomplishments…”
What accomplishments?
Kamala fixed the border crisis she was tasked with addressing back in 2021:
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/25/vice-president-kamala-harris-visits-the-us-mexico-border-.html
She also created some jobs for youngsters when she spent taxpayer dollars hiring actors to be part of her astroturf World Space Week video:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10081977/Kamala-Harris-hired-child-actors-widely-mocked-NASA-space-video.html
i can see an R ad in the coming weeks sardonically highlighting those two points
If she gets the nominee, her odds will be going down quicker than Kamala Harris going down.
Vote 4 Pres. HAWK TUAH
She wouldn't be the first person to make it to the White House by sucking cocks, but the first to do it literally.
If only there were some way to campaign against Newsom or Whitmer. If one of them gets nominated, I guess Republicans are toast.
They’re both terrible. And most people don’t know who Whitmer is. Which is probably in her favor.
She was the one kidnapped by MAGA.
I recall that Harris was going to lead the diplomatic effort in Europe to help negotiate peace between Russian and The Ukraine, before Russia invaded. I think that story was quickly memory-holed though.
Starting WWIII, run away inflation, soaring food and housing costs, trannies running DHHS, a cross dressing theif in charge of US nuclear policy, a dude out on materinty leave while the nation’s infrastructure crumbles, 10 million illegal immigrants, a brain dead diversity hire on SCOTUS, Sloopy pullout from afghanistan, Iran attacks Israel via its proxies about to spark the biggest middle east war ever, Russia invades Ukraine, China colonizes and militarizes every island in the south china sea, etc.
This list is YUUUGGEEEE
‘Twas a sloppy pullout. No denying that.
But muh CHEESY POOFS......RIG COUNT.....1/6=9/11
turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
It’s not going well for you, is it Kiddie Raper?
Record consumer debt, recent highs for repossessions of cars, increased energy costs, increased regulatory costs, politicized the fed to push false numbers morons like shrike can use.
Afghanistan!
She has explained the physics of time and relativity using simple Venn diagrams. And she has an infectious laugh.
"infected", I think you meant.
Afghanistan.
Missed this gem earlier.
L O Fucking L
Hiding his dementia from rubes that was obvious to everyone 4 years ago, providing just enough cover so idiot journalists could ignore it.
That is quite the head scratcher.
Y’all did not disappoint me.
Cheers!
Fuck Joe Biden
Reason Says Boaf Sidez Are Equally Bad
Repubs want KamKam as incumbent. They truly do hate America.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
If she’s the D nominee, you’ll vote for her this fall. Unless Chris Hansen catches up with you before then.
Seriously, who does Shrike think he's tricking?
Not trying to trick anyone you fascist.
I told you I vote for gridlock. The less government does the better.
Which is why you were so obsessed with dems winning the House and Senate on 2022 you retarded lying shit. Lol.
Pluggo’s obsessions are juvenile.
He’s doing it all for the kids.
I told you I vote for gridlock.
That's a funny way to say 'straight Dem ticket all the way down'.
I will take Justin Amash as president right now. I know he has small government principles.
Whoever we get will be far far worse.
You only feel like you can get away with saying that right now because Amash isn't even running. In reality you will push whoever the DNC appoints.
When has he not?
As a Dem I was rooting for Chris Christie. I would have voted for him over Biden just because of his ability to get under the skin of all these Trumpian asshats.
Hahahahaha, goddamn son.
Better to let people assume you’re retarded, than open your mouth and confirm it.
Lol. Yeah, the trumpers just can’t stop talking about fat boy Chris.
You need some adjustment, biden guy. Alcohol may not help. Try fentanyl.
Good,an, you’re stupid. No one gives a shit about that fat lump of rotting offal.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"If Joe Biden is not fit to run for President, he is not fit to serve as President."
Should we remind Mike Johnson about all of the people that said that Trump was unfit to serve as President but later supported him? It no longer means anything to say who is "fit to serve as President." It only matters how the people vote.
Because there's a world of difference between declaring someone 'unfit to serve' because you hate his personality and politics, and declaring someone unfit to serve because he's a drooling, senile, brain-dead corpse.
...declaring someone unfit to serve because he’s a drooling, senile, brain-dead corpse.
When you have a medical degree and get to personally examine Joe Biden, then you opinion of whether he's a "drooling, senile, brain-dead corpse" will matter more than someone else's opinion that Trump has a toxic personality, no moral compass, and is a total moron.
You scream cheap fakes into the sky dont you.
“When you have a medical degree and get to personally examine Joe Biden, then you opinion of whether he’s a “drooling, senile, brain-dead corpse” will matter”
Imagine telling someone with a straight face that in order to call the piss-smelling old dodderer who can barely speak “senile”, you need a medical degree.
“Trump has a toxic personality, no moral compass, and is a total moron"
When you have a divinity degree and get to pastor Donald Trump then you can talk about morals humph-humpf.
Also, tell us again how the serial plagiarizer who lied about his own families deaths and tried to fuck his daughter is more moral than Trump.
If your definition of senile is not intended to be understood as a claim about a medical diagnosis, but is just your opinion, then you don't need a medical degree for that, obviously. Anyone can look at someone and call them 'crazy', 'moronic', 'fat', 'two cans short of a six pack', or whatever other hyperbole or personal insult they'd like. If, on the other hand, you are making a statement about his mental acuity based only on your observations of him speaking in public, then you're still welcome to have a low opinion of his ability, but not to make a claim of a medical diagnosis.
If I had personally observed Donald Trump and had expertise in psychology and/or psychiatry, I could fairly make a diagnosis of whether he has narcissistic personality disorder. I don't have any of that, so my opinion that he is a very narcissistic person is just a lay opinion. The same is true of my opinion that he has no moral compass and is a total moron.
I also reject the idea that religion has any exclusive claim to knowledge of morality. I would argue that religious dogma often hinders understanding many aspects of ethics and morality by relying entirely on ancient texts written in ancient languages that can be difficult to translate, and most of all, relying on religious authorities to decide what those texts mean and what constitutes being moral.
Also, tell us again how the serial plagiarizer who lied about his own families deaths and tried to fuck his daughter is more moral than Trump.
Huh? Who are you talking about?
Look FAT, you’re a Lying Dogfaced Pony Soldier. I challenge you to a push-up contest behind the barn. Winner gets…you know, the thing! Wait, I’m getting in trouble with my wife. Anyway, I killed medicaid.
And he did his goodest to find Jackie. And the long dead world leaders he talked to last month.
Jason’s still not sure, though.
He’s sure those fifty cent deposits cleared his venmo.
^ This is the asshole who supports murder as a preventative measure, but he’s not quite sure what he wants prevented:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?…”
Nope, sorry. Biden suffers from advanced dementia. It’s proven. So stop with your bullshit.
I am glad that he dropped out, because I don't believe that he is sharp enough to do the job for another 4 years. I am even more glad that we aren't stuck with a choice for President between two men that have gone past the current life expectancy of men in the U.S. Now, we get at least one viable choice that isn't as old as dirt.
He wasn’t sharp enough to not shit his pants in front of the pope a couple years ago.
Wait, do you think it’s normal to shit your pants? This explains a lot.
Trump is more capable than any of the fucktards you moronic faggots will nominate. Many of whom are even retarded than your subnormal ass.
Seriously, who do you have that isn’t a brain dead moron (Harris), a narcissistic douchebag that already wrecked his whole state (Newsom), a stupid bitch version of Newsom (Whitmer), or Hillary Clinton, Director of C.U.N.T.?
You have nothing.
^ This is the stinking pile of lefty shit who supports murder as a preventative measure, but he’s not quite sure what he wants prevented:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?…”
“Republicans say Joe should quit now”
I mean, so should YOU guys, right? All of us?
It’s in the republican’s best interest for Biden to remain in office, forcing Kamala to answer for his bumbling public statements and his unwavering zeal to waste more Ukrainian lives. If he quits the presidency now the dems get to hide him in a cabin somewhere.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that the Republicans are far happier with the status quo than Reason or the Democrats.
If Biden steps down then Kamala has to run the country. If she is also the D candidate, she’ll have two jobs where she will blow but neither involves her skillset of blowing.
In 1976, Ford wasn’t going to beat whatever the Ds put up and he came into the Nixon admin late as a congressional negotiation. Kamala has been part of the plethora of Biden admin failures from day one.
She’s getting the nod and the machine will focus on 2028.
I don't like the idea of Harris getting the historical distinction of being our first female president. Even further, her base intelligence is less than Biden's and I'd only vaguely give her a cognitive edge over him because of dementia. She isn't someone who should be near the levers of power.
Robby needs to cut the bs of criticizing Republicans for stating the obvious: Biden isn't currently and never was fit to serve as President. The debate actually forced plenty of influential democrats into finally invoking 25A, though anyone paying attention has been saying it his entire administration. There's plenty of political angles you can look at this from where resigning could benefit either party. The reality is that it's best for the country for him to leave office now because he has been exposed to the world as a non-entity regardless of his official position
I don’t like the idea of Harris getting the historical distinction of being our first female president.
How about the distinction of being the convicted felon President? Trump is going for that achievement.
Tell me you’re a lawfare supporting authoritarian leftist without telling me. Lol.
Guess you missed the news the NYC bullshit case was blown up due to the evidence Bragg used being protected by the USSC. WHOOPS.
People like Jason need to go.
Go where? Having fantasies about rounding up Democrats and forcing us to watch faith-based movies starring Kevin Sorbo?
Guess you missed the news the NYC bullshit case was blown up due to the evidence Bragg used being protected by the USSC. WHOOPS.
So, what evidence was used that was related to official acts by a President? I never heard a real answer to that.
And that doesn't even get to the ridiculousness of that ruling. Only because its Trump would anyone skeptical of government power celebrate making the President immune from prosecution as long as he broke the law doing an official act. Or could get a judge that he might have appointed to rule that it was. Never mind that the President's constitutional duty is to "faithfully execute" the laws of the U.S.
Congratulations for having a Supreme Court you celebrate make the U.S. a country where it is no longer true that no one is above the law.
“Only because its Trump would anyone skeptical of government power celebrate making the President immune from prosecution as long as he broke the law doing an official act.”
This motherfucker supports presidents assassinating people. What a sick fuck. Why are you commentating on a libertarian message board?
Hey retard, why did merchan suspend sentencing?
I get it. You choose ignorance so didnt actually follow the case.
Now tell us how writing a legal expenses as a legal expense is fraudulent.
When you have a medical degree and get to personally examine Joe Biden, then you opinion of whether he’s a “drooling, senile, brain-dead corpse” will matter more than someone else’s opinion
Then a few minutes later:
How about the distinction of being the convicted felon President?
Let us know when you get your law degree.
Do I need a law degree to know that Donald Trump was convicted of felony charges? I think I just need to pay the slightest bit of attention to current events to know a simple, documented fact like that.
I’m not a veterinarian, but I know a bitch when I see one.
He’s not convicted felon until the judge sentences him.
The NY trial was such a farce that even CNN’s legal analysts trashed it. Nothing Trump did was even close to election interference.
I thought a guilty verdict by a jury is what people mean by "conviction", but I suppose I was, in fact, wrong that being convicted of a felony is what makes someone a "convicted felon." The law can be funny, can't it? Being convicted of a felony isn't enough to be a convicted felon (they need to be sentenced first, just like you said).
Still, there are six months between now and inauguration day. There is still time for Trump to be sentenced, so that he could get that distinction. Even if the case is tossed out on the 'immunity' claim (now that is a really funny legal claim), and he wins, then he would still have the distinction of being the only President found guilty of a felony by a jury. Or is there some twist in the law that I didn't know there too?
If you want to not be retarded you should know why he was convicted. How even lawyers on the left stated how political the case was, how badly formulated the case was, and how it is such a departure from legal norms even they were against it.
But youre an authoritarian leftist hoping the US becomes like Venezuela.
I'm pretty sure that I've said before that this case was a big stretch, if not more than that. But the facts were not successfully disputed by Trump's defense. That is why he was convicted. Jurors aren't lawyers. Their job is to judge the credibility of evidence presented and see if what they accept as true fits the elements of a crime according to a judge's instructions.
Did Trump falsify business records? (or order it done by employees)
The jury answered yes. They were presented with all kinds of business records and heard testimony from people involved that would know.
Did Trump do so in order to conceal or further another crime?
The jury answered yes to this question also, and that is what you and others seem to dispute here. Paying off a porn star to not talk to the press about her alleged sexual encounter with Trump is what you don't think was a crime. By itself, it definitely wasn't. But is it a crime when done to hide damaging information to his candidacy? I would say no to that also, if he paid for it with his own money. I understood part of the theory of it being a crime was that the mechanism of payment ran afoul of campaign finance laws. Like I said, a big stretch, at best, but the jury accepted it.
I feel that the jury was so ready to believe Cohen, Daniels, and all of the records and arguments by the prosecution because Trump managed to undercut his own defense. Being who he is, he felt the need to deny all kinds of things that were easy to believe were true. (Like him having sex with a porn star. Trump's reputation for infidelity and belief in his own sexual appeal long predates his candidacy.) Even though he didn't testify (the one smart thing he did in his trial), he couldn't keep himself impassive and detached in front of the jury. He was always his pugnacious self. Antagonizing a judge over one's trial is never smart either. Especially with the history of people Trump attacks getting threats from his biggest fans.
But youre an authoritarian leftist hoping the US becomes like Venezuela.
I just wonder if you were having this conversation with someone in person, would you say the same thing? What if instead of some anonymous person on the internet, I was someone with whom you could suffer negative consequences for engaging in personal attacks like that based on a political disagreement?
^ This is the TDS-addled pile of lefty shit who supports murder as a preventative measure, but he’s not quite sure what he wants prevented:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?…”
...waste more Ukrainian lives.
Oh, so helping Ukraine fight an invasion of their country is wasting their lives now? I'm sure that Trump and Vance are eager to stop spending money on equipment and weapons sent to Ukraine so that they can spend it on something else, so they plan to just get Ukraine to agree to a deal reducing its borders to what they control now. That will stop "wasting" Ukrainian lives, I suppose. Whether it will do anything to stop Putin or any other future Russian leader that wants to recreate the Russian Empire from invading Ukraine again or other sovereign nations that were once completely under Moscow's thumb is another matter.
^ This is the slimy pile of lefty shit who supports murder as a preventative measure, but he’s not quite sure what he wants prevented:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?…”
lol, never took you for a warmongering neocon.
I am a "warmongering neocon" because I think that Ukraine has a right to defend itself from an unprovoked invasion by an authoritarian regime with a dictatorial leader that lusts to return his country to the glory days of dominance over all neighbors like in his youth?
Jeez, I wonder if you think that the people saying that Israel has a right to defend itself from Hamas are warmongering neocons. Probably not, since Trump says he supports Israel. He doesn't care about Ukraine, so you don't either. Must be nice not to have to think for yourself.
No, you’re a neocon warmongering fuckstick because you think we need to be “helping Ukraine fight”.
They have every right to defend their borders. We have every right to tell them to fuck off when they come begging for money.
Same with Israel.
And newsflash asshole, Trump isn’t some cult leader that everyone who disagrees with you follows and worships, no matter how much y’all want to project your own lemming like attitudes onto anyone to the right of Mao.
“I am a “warmongering neocon” because I think that Ukraine has a right to defend itself from an unprovoked invasion by an authoritarian regime with a dictatorial leader that lusts to return his country to the glory days of dominance over all neighbors like in his youth?”
I see you’re a simpleton. Let me try to explain, although I’m confident this topic is above your ability to comprehend.
People have a right to defend themselves. The Ukrainian government does not have a right to conscript Ukrainians to “defend” territories that they previously sent Nazis into to terrorize the Russian speaking people that lived there.
To call it unprovoked displays that you’re completely ignorant to the point of being a complete joke to anyone with a basic knowledge of topic.
Most importantly “helping Ukraine” =/= them having a right to do anything. You’re welcome to go anywhere in the world and help anyone you want defend themselves. You don’t have a right to steal my money and put my safety at risk to do so. (Although I’d be happy to donate for your plane ticket to defend Christians anywhere in Africa where they’re being slaughtered, but you don’t seem concerned with them, racist).
Now fuck back off to wherever you got your sophomoric understanding of the world and stop bothering libertarians with your statist interventionist bullshit.
People have a right to defend themselves. The Ukrainian government does not have a right to conscript Ukrainians to “defend” territories that they previously sent Nazis into to terrorize the Russian speaking people that lived there.
I see you buy into Putin's propaganda.
To call it unprovoked displays that you’re completely ignorant to the point of being a complete joke to anyone with a basic knowledge of topic.
Oh, please do explain how Ukraine provoked Russia to invade, rain missiles on civilians, including a children's hospital recently, and conquer territory when Russia had agreed to respect Ukraine's sovereign borders in 1994. I'm really interested to see how you manage that without bullshit references to Russian propaganda about Nazis.
You don’t have a right to steal my money and put my safety at risk to do so.
I'm not stealing anything. The U.S. spending money to aid a country under attack from another is a policy choice decided by the legislators and President that we elect, just like every other policy choice. If you don't like the U.S. supporting Ukraine, you are absolutely free to vote for the Putin fanboy.
Now fuck back off to wherever you got your sophomoric understanding of the world and stop bothering libertarians with your statist interventionist bullshit.
People can call themselves whatever they want, but I rarely see anything libertarian about how commenters here defend Trump and deride those that oppose him.
Lol. Russia hasn’t been able to finish off the Ukes in 2.5 years and you’re worried about their next target?
Say, ain’t you the dude who said that commenting here had negative health impacts on you?
You might be overthinking things, Jason. Smoke a doobie or something. Fuck.
Yeah, I’m sure if you were in charge of the Vietnam war, you would have kept on fighting.
Ukraine can’t win. We were winning in Korea until China got involved, and Truman decided not to risk a nuclear war. Peace was achieved after Korea gave up territory to the commies.
When Ukraine inevitably cedes territory to end the war, we’ll remind you that sensible people like Elon musk made that proposal years before. Thousands of Ukrainians in the prime of their lives could have been saved. The war likely doesn’t even happen if Trump was still president. War is a consequence of knowingly voting for s senile man as president.
Yeah, I’m sure if you were in charge of the Vietnam war, you would have kept on fighting.
No, because had I been "in charge" of anything related to Vietnam, we wouldn't have been fighting there at all, just like we aren't in Ukraine. If we had decided that it was in the U.S. interest to help a corrupt South Vietnamese government fight the North Vietnamese communists, weapons and advisers was plenty. The domino theory was always too weak to justify U.S. troops in a country that far from us and our allies and that was still well short of modern industrial capability.
For Ukraine, Putin followed the same strategy he had in Georgia in 2008, getting Russian speaking people in the Donbas region Russian passports so he could justify his support for 'separatists' (that were probably really just Russian soldiers not in uniform in many cases) to 'protect' Russian citizens from Nazis or whatever other BS he felt like throwing out there. Centuries of Russian empire followed by the Soviet Union planted Russian people in territories well outside of Russia itself all along Russia's borders. That was deliberate by the Tsars and then by Stalin, as a way to increase their ability to control areas that they conquered. When you have ethnically Russian people in Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia, and so on, even when they had been in those places for generations, they will still be more loyal to Moscow than their neighbors that speak a different language. Putin dreams of regaining that kind of influence again, so when economic pressure, political manipulation, and corruption doesn't work to keep the former Soviet republics firmly under his thumb, he's ready to draw upon that loyalty to subvert the governments and sovereignty of those independent nations.
It is absolutely not in our interest to let him get away with that. But, we are not so interested in what happens that we would risk war with Russia, and if Putin has any rationality left, he won't risk war with NATO either. Fighting a proxy war is a dangerous game, but the risks would still have been substantial if we had limited our disapproval to sanctions and diplomacy. If nothing else, not doing more would send a signal to both Russia and China that NATO wasn't willing to take any risks to defend any non-member. That would substantially up the risk of China invading Taiwan (very bad for us, given Taiwan's microprocessor industry that we rely on) and upping its attempts to dominate the South China Sea trade routes (also very bad for us as massive amounts of our imports go through there).
Cold wars are dangerous, but we won the first one because we kept the Soviet Union and China at bay by showing that we were willing to try and block them from expanding their dominance. We squandered that victory by thinking that winning meant that they were no longer peer adversaries. And that closer economic ties would soften their authoritarian tendencies and antagonism. But democracy doesn't spread as easily as we thought it does. Nor can we really do much to get other countries to move in that direction. They have to want it themselves. The great game of nations is not a contest about morality. It is a contest of what is in each country's best interest. But there is still an important role for ethics and morality to play. Shared values can bind nations together just as strongly as economic interests, if not more so, since economic interests can change. And it is always good to have friends.
When Ukraine inevitably cedes territory to end the war, we’ll remind you that sensible people like Elon musk made that proposal years before.
Ukraine rightly believes that ceding territory means having lost the war. You say that Ukraine can't win, by which I assume you mean that it won't be able to take back all of the lost territory. That much is probably true. But Ukraine has done far better than anyone would have suspected prior to Russia moving in on Feb. 24, 2022. Putin certainly thought getting to Kyiv and installing a puppet regime was going to be easy. Ukraine could have been in a better position now, had the most recent aid package not been delayed by several months after Trump pushed Republicans in Congress to diddle about.
Per Biden, Trump is currently the Vice President. So if Biden steps down, Trump becomes potus.
Clever old Joe, through the dementia a ray of cunning shines through. He didn't screw up at all. Joe steps down, Trump becomes president and can't run against Kamala for a third term.
Even if that were somehow to occur (VP Trump takes over), I think he could still run and serve again. LBJ dropped out in 1968 because his and team D’s war in Vietnam was going poorly and not because he was termed out (completing JFK’s presidency and then 4 years of his own win in 1964).
It only counts as a term if it exceeds two years. So no, Trump would not be term limited by serving six months.
This is beautiful. The circle is complete.
Aaron Sorkin: Democrats should pick Mitt Romney to beat Trump
He'd be the first RINO-DINO.
I guess Mitt's Hitler status has been officially revoked.
Would we still get to talk of binders full of women and dogs strapped to automobile roofs?
The logic is solid. If Biden is dropping out of the race because he's unfit to serve, how can we trust him to run the government for the next 6 months? And if he's not unfit to serve, why is he yielding to pressure from party insiders to overrule the will of the primary voters?
Democrats could make the case that Biden is okay for now (as long as any crises pop up between 10AM and 4PM), but given his advanced age he's unlikely to be able to serve another 4 years. But if that's the case, he could still campaign and then resign in a year or two if his medical condition worsens. Of course, we all saw the debate and we know he's already past the point where he's capable of serving as President.
The logic is solid. If Biden is dropping out of the race because he’s unfit to serve, how can we trust him to run the government for the next 6 months? And if he’s not unfit to serve, why is he yielding to pressure from party insiders to overrule the will of the primary voters?
Maybe because 4 years is longer than 6 months?
Captain obvious has entered the chat.
^ This is the steaming pile of lefty shit who supports murder as a preventative measure, but he's not quite sure what he wants prevented:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”
4 years is longer than 6 months?
A nuclear war takes about 16 minutes.
Hey, if Jill Biden doesn't want to continue her run for reelection, it's her prerogative to drop out of the race.
Virtually the entire Democratic Party has implicitly conceded that Biden doesn't fit that description.
They have?!? Most of what I’ve seen has been pretty explicit… that Biden was a good President and has made a brave and noble decision to cede the nomination to someone younger.
Hard to divine something implicitly when people are saying the opposite explicitly.
"Biden was a good President and has made a brave and noble decision to cede the nomination to someone younger."
Chuckle.
"...Biden was a good President and has made a brave and noble decision to cede the nomination to someone younger..."
Afghanistan and the border, shit-for-brains.
They told him to quit, you fucking idiot.
It was a soft coup by the party.
It’s a tough time to be you, isn’t it? Especially with that handle. Maybe you should just slink off and hide under your rock.
M’kay, bitch?
The NY Post runs down the potential VP picks for Harris (or the Democrat Presidential nominee to be named later):
https://nypost.com/2024/07/21/us-news/who-could-kamala-harris-pick-as-vp-here-are-10-top-contenders/
Pete Buttigieg (no, really)
Widely regarded as a breakout star,... Why do all of the Dems' breakout stars lose their races though? Buttigieg, Abrams, Beto, etc. (Why not VP Beto?)
Gavin Newsom (imagine if he does to America what he did to California. I mean "for")
Andy Beshear (Kentucky governor, complete unknown)
Gretchen Whitmer (maybe she just looks power mad and evil, and isn't really?)
JB Pritzker (Illinois governor. hey, he's rich)
Josh Shapiro (Pennsylvania governor) I have a feeling this pick wouldn't go over so well with the Squad and other "progressive" Dems for some reason
Roy Cooper (North Carolina governor, another complete unknown)
Wes Moore (Maryland governor) Claim to fame is that a bridge in his state got hit by a boat. No, really.
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore was thrust into the national spotlight after the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapsed back in March and his name has been floated around for presidential buzz ever since.
Elizabeth Warren (long time Senator. And only 75 years old. And someone who'd like to have a beer with you.)
Amy Klobuchar (in case Iowa gets to vote first in the general election) oh wait, she's from Minnesota. At least they might match Mondale.
Andy Beshear would be their best pick because he's still unknown and they could probably trick the electorate with him for a bit.
But maniacs that they are, I'm guessing that they are going to go with Buttigieg.
Shapiro is the odds-on favorite on at least one betting site.
Buttgag is an incompetent lightweight.
It’s time for geriatric candidates for President who can’t remember where they are to make room for someone younger.
Age is the issue
That's cheapfake.
What about all the geriatric congress critters?
It's time for lefty shit piles to FOAD.
In all fairness, the republicans have been saying that for 3 1/2 years.
And they have been right.
Those were Cheapfakes
Many here have said it even longer.
Folks are buzzing about the manchin of a certain WV senator reregistering as a Dem and running for the nomination.
That old fossil (fuel supporter)? Won't he be 80 by the end of the term too?
Hope Robby delivers a crispy $100 to that girl he made the bet with.
He's right that Jill was not interested in stepping aside. I'm curious whether it took a carrot or stick to make her finally back down
That video on the laptop.
Seeing as Joe's closest advisors found out he dropped out on X, do we actually know he was involved in dropping out? See politico.
This seems like a bad idea for Republicans. If Kamala is president, then it seems like she would have an advantage.
People would know she can do the job, she would definitely be the first woman president instead of just potentially.
And it's not like Biden has been actually running things for years now.
Do what job? Look up how John Nance Garner described being vice president.
The job of the vp is to preside over the Senate and break ties. That’s it. They have no advisory role, no powers, no nothing. Just tie breaker.
Already making excuses for kamala. Lol.
Sarc is sort of correct. Kamala is a useless do nothing idiot.
That VP job of presiding over the Senate is an article 1 role not an article 2 role. It is why there can be no ‘executive privilege’ with Trump ordering Pence to do something on Jan6. There is no boss-subordinate role and Pence is serving a legislative function not an executive function.
I wouldathunk the Supreme Court actually read the constitution when they signed off on the Trump immunity opinion. But apparently they didn’t really read the constitution.
VP could actually be a real role as a check on the Prez via their role in the Senate.
Your legal knowledge is as strong as your pandemic knowledge. See your issue?
You are correct in that the Constitution only provides for the VP to be the 'spare' and to preside over the Senate as its president and break ties. But the President can give the VP quite a few other roles, projects, and duties if they want to.
The VP could be a liaison: to Congress (especially the Senate that they preside over) and to foreign countries.
The VP could be a spokesperson, interacting with the press and the public about the administrations' actions and agenda.
The VP could be an advisor, sitting in on important meetings, getting the same briefings about national security as the President, and generally being part of the decision-making process.
Not having any constitutional authority in any of these roles doesn't mean that the President can't make the VP important to the administration.
So, it is all about how the President treats and uses the VP as to whether the VP is truly important or not.
Wait, you think Harris could actually do the job of President?
If Trump was able to do it, then who couldn't?
My guess is that a few months of President Harris would help sway the vote toward Trump.
To they want Trump going up against President Harris? It is like the Republicans want Trump to...oh.
Biden should've quit the presidency three and a half years ago.
His administration has been one big abortion right after another.
Biden always supported the right of a president to choose.
See Whoops, Apocalypse!.