Louisiana Parents Sue Over Law Mandating 10 Commandments Displays in Classrooms
"This is an obvious attempt to use our public schools to convert kids to Christianity. We live in a democracy, not a theocracy," one ACLU attorney tells Reason.

Last month, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) signed a bill mandating that a copy of the Ten Commandments be displayed in all public school classrooms in Louisiana. The law, House Bill 71, requires that the religious scripture be displayed on a poster or frame sized at least 11 inches by 14 inches and in a "large, easily readable font."
Apparently anticipating a First Amendment challenge to the mandatory religious text, lawmakers included several provisions that attempt to strengthen the law against a constitutional challenge. For example, the law prohibits schools from using taxpayer funds to finance the posters, instead directing them to accept private donations.
The law further directs schools to display a context document that describes "the history of the Ten Commandments in American Public Education." This requirement attempts to undermine the religious nature of the scripture, instead showing how the "historical role of the Ten Commandments accords with our nation's history and faithfully reflects the understanding of the founders of our nation with respect to the necessity of civic morality to a functional self-government."
While the text of the law attempts to dodge accusations that it prescribes public schools to display an openly Christian text in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, Louisiana lawmakers openly argued that the law would put religion in Louisiana schools.
"I really believe that we are lacking in direction. A lot of people, their children, are not attending churches or whatever," Rep. Sylvia Taylor (D–Laplace), a co-author and co-sponsor of the bill, said during a debate over the bill. "So what I'm saying is, we need to do something in the schools to bring people back to where they need to be." Another sponsor state Rep. Dodie Horton (R–Haughton) said that the bill "seeks to have a display of God's law in the classroom for children to see what He says is right and what He says is wrong."
Last week, a multifaith group of parents with children in Louisiana public schools filed a lawsuit, alleging that the law violates students' and parents' First Amendment rights.
The law "unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture….It substantially interferes with and burdens the right of parents to direct their children's religious education and upbringing," the complaint reads,
"There is no longstanding tradition of permanently displaying the Ten Commandments in public-school classrooms in Louisiana or the United States more generally," the complaint states, further alleging that the historical context document required by the law includes many inaccuracies, including a fabricated quotation from James Madison in which the fourth president claimed that the future of the young United States was staked "upon the capacity of each of ourselves to govern ourselves according to the moral principles of the Ten Commandments."
By enforcing H.B. 71, Louisiana "will substantially burden the religious exercise of the Plaintiff parents and other parents who do not subscribe to the state-sanctioned version of the Ten Commandments," the complaint reads, "interfering with, conflicting with, and usurping their ability to direct their children's religious education and religious upbringing."
"Hundreds of thousands of kids are going to be required to see these displays every day in every classroom….Those who don't believe in the state's official religious doctrine will be to [sic] made to feel like outcasts who don't belong in their own school community," Heather Weaver, a senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union, tells Reason. "This is an obvious attempt to use our public schools to convert kids to Christianity. We live in a democracy, not a theocracy, and anyone who wants to keep it that way should care about stopping this law."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Equal representation ! Post tenets from the Torah, Quran, Satanic Bible, and every other nonsensical dogma source in the same schools right next to each other so that the dear children can learn about all the various religions that have no meaning to them nor historical inclusion in schools.
PS - Post chapter one of "Atlas Shrugged", I think that is a religion now, too. Not sure.
Hell, Christians keep claiming Atheism is a religion so post something of ours too... how about a series of quotes by Christopher Hitchens.
How about climate catastrophism, CRT, Marxism ... be careful what you wish for.
So other than the false idols (and even that isn't bad out of the specific religious context) which of the commandments do you think children should not have reinforced as decent behavior?
Well, the first half of them suck.
You shall have no other God's before me.
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven images.
Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.
Remember the Sabbath day and keep it Holy.
Honor your father and mother.
The last half are OK, but they don't cover a lot of the horrible shit people do. Nothing about slavery. Nothing about treating women as something other than property. Nothing about tolerance of others. Nothing about fucking kids. The list goes on.
Also at least three of the five that aren't too bad were broken in the same book that had the commandments. The Israelites were told to kill the Cananites. They were told to steal the Cananites stuff which I assume so broke the rule about coveting the Cananites stuff. They were told to kill any women who had known the touch of a man so I guess they didn't technically commit adultery because they only enslaved the girls who were virgins and we assume they fucked the shit out of those virgins. But that's OK, because slavery and rape aren't in the commandments. Last we have the one about false witnessing. Since they bragged it up so much I guess we can't say they lied about it. So yeah. Three of the five.
Well said.
Full credit is due to Christopher Hitchens from God is not Great. He has a whole chapter on how the Ten Commandments are garbage because they don't actually address any of the real nasty shit humans do to each other. Sure murder and theft are bad, but really not the worst that humas do. I'd rather be murdered or have my car stolen than ass raped or enslaved.
TBF, the 10 Commandments ARE in the Torah and Quran.
But yeah, this is a stupid thing to be focusing on when your students can barely read, write, or do math.
This is the camels nose in the tent. If not stopped in 5 years they will be mandating Bible study classes. Thus is how the religious right works. I watched it in the 80s and 90s. Now they are running the play book again.
Government schools need to be disbanded, not reorganized, religionized or re... um.. re... Fuck. Can't think of another. Haven't had magic black bean juice yet.
Schools already do. They have LGBT pride and BLM banners.
Those should also not be allowed.
Where do you think the Ten Commandments come from?
The Torah, the Bible, and the Quran.
And do we use the 9 Satanic Statements or the Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth?
Or even among Christians, there are at least two different versions of the 10 Commandments. The Catholics and Lutherans use one that was re-arranged by St Augustine, while the Greek Orthodox and most Protestants use one based in the older Septuagint.
The Bible has two different copies with some significant differences. Fuck if I can recall which book it is but it's one thats after exodus.
Apparently anticipating a First Amendment challenge to the mandatory religious text, lawmakers included several provisions that attempt to strengthen the law against a constitutional challenge. For example, the law prohibits schools from using taxpayer funds to finance the posters, instead directing them to accept private donations.
Wait, they’re requiring it be displayed but not allowing public money be spent on it? That’s just retarded. If it’s a legal requirement, you have to fund it.
I will bet that local churches will jump up to provide 10 Commandments along with advertising for their church to the schools. Probably already in the works.
It would be nice if unfunded mandates were constitutional but that's not even close to true. Congress passes all sorts of requirements and expects other people to pay for it.
"Sure, I dont have a problem with nudging my kid into a cult of gender confusion, sterilization, and mental instability, but things like 'Thou shalt not kill' are a bridge too far!," quoted the frumpy side-shaved-purple-haired woman with the anemic looking husband, who stood quietly by nodding
Technically, it is 'Thou shall not commit murder".
Killing is OK in the legally sanctioned kind of way, like executions and wars; both were specifically ordered later in the old testament.
There's more in there about how to worship their god than any morals. There also isn't anything about not raping, enslaving or a lot of other things.
The murder one is okay, so is the stealing one, as is the false witness one, but the rest kinda suck.
No other gods? No idols? Keeping the Sabbath? Taking his name in vain? How about Yahweh stops being so touchy
No coveting? Coveting is like the whole basis of capitalism.
No adultery might seem okay, but it's not anyone's business but the married couple.
Honoring your parents is probably not bad, but your parents could be dicks. Should Joan Crawford's daughter honor her? Ashley Biden should have just honored her father by showering with Creepy Joe? (And that is not rhetorical, given how much incest is in the OT, and it notably not being a commandment)
As a pro religion atheist, this protect is not a winner.
Add a unit to social studies and compare it Hammurabi's code, sharia, Magna Carta, etc.
I've no problem with bibles if they are placed in the proper context. Mythology. Not history. There are Israeli Archeologists that have tried to find proof for the events in the Torah. As far as I know they haven't found any that were true yet. They have found stories that are very similar from all the religions around the region.
Remember back in the day when it was backwards bigots who would be ridiculed with "WTF is wrong with you?" for the idea that just witnessing two people of the same sex kissing would turn people gay?
That banning visual depictions in public libraries was tantamount to banning any/all portions of the LGBTQIA+ community?
Apparently, now, simply reading "You shall have no other Gods before me.", despite not being strictly or explicitly Christian and despite Christ's message that the simple reading of it, let alone observing, abiding, living of it alone isn't sufficient for redemption, automatically makes you a Christian.
"You shall have no other gods before me" isn't explicitly Christian? How is that? There is only one Monotheism out there today, the Abrahamic faiths. Other mythologies don't play that game. Roman travelers frequently dropped coins to foreign gods when they were in places where other gods were in charge. Polytheism is far more tolerant than monotheism. I don't think anyone is going to confuse the 10 Commandments for anything other than an Abrahamic and primarily Christian thing since Jews don't prostelize and Muslims just kill the infidels.
As long as you are killing a slave you own, it's probably o.k. according to the Old Testament.
Also if it is your own disobedient child. You're supposed to stone them, I don't think there is a non lethal or less than lethal stoning... unless their god meant to smoke them up...
….It substantially interferes with and burdens the right of parents to direct their children's religious education and upbringing,"
So after the win, all the pride nonsense and blm bullshit also have to go?
It will depend on how the courts rule I suppose. Religion usually involves superstitions and invisible friends.
Here's a bible-friendly sex-ed story!
Ezekiel 23:20: "She craved men with genitalia like donkeys and emissions like stallions."
Then we can tell the story of God having a couple of bears eat a town's children 'cuz they made fun of Elisha's bald head.
And finally, There's the great story of the talking donkey!
Dang it! Teach the WHOLE bible or none at all.
Don't forget the murder, theft, enslavement and rape of the Palestine region. I think that's in the same book as the Commandments.
Yeah, but the Cannanites were dicks.
(Also, war and conquest is how every nation gets started so that’s nothing that extraordinary.)
Nothing extraordinary, except that they just had the ten commandments laid down and they weren't supposed to murder or steal. Both things they did against the Cannanites who were just chilling at home when these bat shit crazy monotheists came out of the desert and started getting all up in their shit.
If they didn't have some kind of commandments against killing and stealing it wouldn't be a big deal. The Roman's didn't have a 10 Commandments. So when they did that shit it wasn't hypocritical. For the Jwws it is hypocritical.
Then there's Ruth giving Boaz a blow-job, though the language is euphemistic.
So are they required to post the Catholic Ten Commandments, the Protestant Ten Commandments, the Jewish Ten Commandments, or the Samaritan Eleven Commandments?
Well, one person claimed the law says the school can’t spend money on the Commandmentd so I guess then they will get whatever is donated by whatever local church.
I think they should post them in the original Hebrew. The Jews won't be offended, and everyone else won't understand enough to be offended.
That I could almost agree with if Hebrew was a useful modern language.
The Catholic ones, obviously.
Relevant.
Like ENB's "Without the right to access coat hanger abortions, women's would have no rights at all." idiocy, we're crossing back across the Rubicon to come back in.
As I indicated above, if you think video imagery of a same-sex couples making out broadcast at your local library or instruction books at your local school library is going to somehow turn kids gay you're a homophobic bigot. However, in a manner so insane that even the most religiously devout don't even believe it intrinsically as part of their teachings for the obvious paradox(es) it invokes, even witnessing the text of the 10 Commandments displayed in a public space will irrevocably convert all those who gaze upon it to a life of virtue and redeem their mortal souls in perpetuity.
The law "unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture….It substantially interferes with and burdens the right of parents to direct their children's religious education and upbringing," the complaint reads,
How? They're not required to observe, venerate, or adopt it.
"Hundreds of thousands of kids are going to be required to see these displays every day in every classroom….Those who don't believe in the state's official religious doctrine will be to [sic] made to feel like outcasts who don't belong in their own school community,"
They said, unironically, the day after the 30-day secular novena of gay sex and pedophilia.
First off gay shit isn't a religion. There are no superstitions or invisible friends. Gay people are real. They exist. They form relationships, open busineses and do all sorts of real things to prove their existence. Teaching about real things is what schools should do. They are something people will have to deal with when they are adults. Now of only they would teach heterosexual reproduction so kids would know about their own drives and urges.
Secondly, pedophia has nothing to do with being gay. I have dealt with actual convicted pedophiles and they are in no way homosexual. They are pretty run of the mill people who have locked onto children as an object of their desire. They need to be medicated and kept far away from kids.
Your religious intolerance is showing.
It is a religion
Why? Is religion and faith something so common that you grant it to any group that takes themselves too seriously? Is following Trump a religion? Does that mean Christians are having another god, which breaks a commandment I think.
Is following Trump a religion?
:/ It's kinda getting there.
Does that mean Christians are having another god, which breaks a commandment I think.
That would be an accurate statement, assuming the truth of its preceding premise.
Which is why people say it of the LGBTpedo, Enviro, and Wokeness cults. They've taken it too far. They've sent it past a mere social/political stance, and turned it into an identity. They're a religion now. Complete with their own bibles, saints, and heretics. None of which involve God. At least, one that isn't self-defined.
Which means either A) we take them out of State-sponsored venues; or B) we include the ACTUAL True Religion as an alternative to all this pagan nonsense in those State-sponsored venues.
You pick. I'm OK with either.
Well, what you need to do is make a cogent argument in a legal sense and fight it up through the courts that Wokeianity or whatever you want to call it is a religion and thus can't be in schools. I don't understand why this hasn't been done already. Plenty of churches have the money to make a legal fight of it. If it's as prevelent as you claim there should be plenty of cases to back.
Of course, that means setting a firm line that religion has no place in schools and maybe that's why no church has taken the ball and ran with it. They want to get their religion back in so they don't want to strengthen the Establishment argument.
The 2025 project in the chapter on the Department of Education uses 44 pages to demand the reorganization of the department of education by moving its parts to other federal agencies and then terminating the department. They don't want government schools gone, they want to control the schools themselves.
I don’t understand why this hasn’t been done already. Plenty of churches have the money to make a legal fight of it.
Because they're tolerant. Unlike the Woke, GayPedo, and Enviro cults.
Bullshit. If they were tolerant we wouldn't have had a gay rights movement. People would have just said, "Sure. Why shouldn't gays have the right to fuck their lives up with marriage?" But they didn't. Churches fought tooth and nail to stop them from being seen as normal.
Christians are only tolerant of other Christians.
They could be no more tolerant of LGBT pedo than they could be of a group of people insisting that 2+2=10. There's no reason whatsoever to be "tolerant" of something that it clearly, on its face, demonstrably wrong - and which can make no valid, rational argument whatsoever to justify itself as anything but wrong.
See, this is what I was talking about below. This is such a "if it feels good, do it" mentality - shored up with a "it's not hurting anyone" claim. Well believing "2+2=10" doesn't hurt anyone either, but that doesn't make it any more acceptable or less false.
First off gay shit isn’t a religion.
lol, ok.
Teaching about real things is what schools should do.
OK groomer.
Just because your imaginary freind hates gays doesn't mean they aren't a reality. Also I'd say preists and preachers have buggered more kids than gay people, since gay people are attracted to adults of the same sex. Calling me a groomer means nothing. You call everyone you disagree with groomer. It means less than right wing extremist.
Except that you actually outright advocate for grooming kids. Like you literally just did right here.
Grooming them for what? Accepting the world as it is instead of living in some fantasy world where gays don't exist?
You said “teaching them real things.”
Which referred to, as you put it, “gay shit.” (Language.)
Meaning you want to teach them “gay shit.” aka, you’re a groomer. You want to groom them into the “gay shit.”
The LGBT pedo religion has no place whatsoever in schools. Or society. It teaches only chaos, unreality, self-destruction, and anti-humanism.
Gay people are real people. They exist. You will likely meet them in the world. Thus kids learning that such people exist and having some idea about what makes them gay people is the job of education. Mind you how to balance a check book and get a car loan should be taught as well.
I think you mean gay shit in a totally different way than I do. I doubt the schools are showing videos of men fucking each other. You may think they are and your churches may be claiming this but I've my doubts. My son has only been out of high school for 4 years. He never has a class on gay sex. Hell, he never had a class on sex.
Any "grooming" as you call it happens in after school clubs between individual teachers bringing their politics into the mix.
Which they should not do and it should be easy to get them moved to a facility where they don't have contact with kids. You can't get them fired but most school districts have a place for teachers not allowed to have contact with children.
Gay people are real people. They exist.
Didn't say they didn't. All of us are sinners in one way or another - they just more glaringly and unapologetically so. It's why they literally define themselves with "Pride."
Thus kids learning that such people exist and having some idea about what makes them gay people is the job of education.
No, it's not the job of education. It's the job of education to say, "These people exist. And are wrong for their actions, behaviors, and lifestyle choices as they do so. Be wary of them in general, but try to encourage them to be better people."
Drug addicts exist. Drunkards exist. People who don't return the grocery cart to the corral exist. It's arguably important to teach people that they exist (so long as we're keeping age and maturity level in mind) - but YOU want to go a step farther, and teach them to be tolerance of the choices and lifestyles they make as they exist. That's where your argument unravels completely, which is why you try to obfuscate it merely as "they exist, therefore it should be taught."
I doubt the schools are showing videos of men fucking each other.
No, they sneak the porno into the class curriculum and school libraries.
Any “grooming” as you call it happens in after school clubs between individual teachers bringing their politics into the mix.
Which is A LOT these days. There are literally hundreds and hundreds of publicly viewable school board meetings where parents all across the nation are pointing this out. There's thousands of TikTok videos where teachers themselves - IN their classrooms - are bragging about it. It may not be homosexual pornography, but a pride-flag wearing teacher saying "use my pronouns" and an administration who takes her side over that of the students/parents is the same thing at the end of the day.
Grooming.
Y”know, Mx – I missed something earlier about your post. You made a pretty big reveal. Something I didn’t fully explore. It was this:
I doubt the schools are showing videos of men fucking each other.
Would you have a problem with it if they were? If so, why? Your whole argument is “gay people are real” – well, gay sex is real too. Show it to kids? Train them at a young age to see it, understand it, accept it, tolerate it, emulate it?
Is there something about children that compels you to want to expose them to stuff like this? I think you overplayed your hand here, Mx. I think you just revealed yourself as yet another faggot pedophile preying on kids. Am I right? If you refuse to answer the bolded “why?” above, this is the only reasonable conclusion.
And I’ll tell you the same thing I tell KAR – you better knock that stuff off, and fast, or some good ‘ol boys are going to come find you and drag you from the hitch of their truck.
>Also I’d say preists and preachers have buggered more kids than gay people
Err, you know priests and preachers having sex with boys are gay people?
No they aren't. Gay people have sex with adults of the same sex. Pedophiles have sex with kids of whatever sex they can get. Alter boys were convienet. Once they had alter girls the buggery expanded to encompas the change in the market.
LGBTQxyz pride is essentially a religion, because it's considered blasphemy to question it.
Bullshit. Plenty of famous folks have done exactly that and haven't been canceled. The tide is shifting.
Tractor Supply Company just abandoned their DEI programs and walked away from all support for PRIDE organizations. They were talked into it by their advertising people. I suspect Tractor Supply has new advertising people.
> Gay people are real. They exist.
So do Neo Nazis, doesn't mean their beliefs should be paraded around schools, government buildings and workplaces.
Just leave the kids alone.
kids need to know about the dark periods of our history as much as the bright ones. They need to know such people exist and why they are wrong.
Yes, but we're not teaching them about this LGBT dark period! We're confusing and misleading them by pretending that it's a bright period when it's so obviously not.
But, you just touched on the inherent rotten core of progressivism. Progressivism never stops to ask the question, "Progressing to what, and to what end?"
There was a great line I read today. When you're the party of progress, your only play is to create victims and attack the status quo. Problem is, they're out of victims. They've defeated all the bad guys.
So now they're creating them.
Progressivism is a man walking towards a cliff, thinking that when he it reaches it he'll have progressed enough to defy gravity. At no point does it ever enter into his consideration, "Stop. Maybe think about what you're doing for a sec."
WRONG. We live in a *Constitutional* Republic.
The very reason the USA is failing is because people won’t recognize the US Constitution.
Ironically; The 'democracy' is exactly what these morons are getting good and hard.
No matter what we aren't a theocracy. At least thay got that part right.
We live in a constitutional republic that is a representative democracy. Not all such republics are representative democracies, nor are all representative democracies constitutional republics.
And that's not just a tire that's a whole car! /s
Proclaiming a minor 'part' of something as the whole thing is just incoherent idiocy/deception. Which the deception is the whole point for leftards.
It won't be so funny when a "wise guy" student starts asking the teacher to explain, say, adultery and lust, why it was his great uncle's duty to kill brown folks in a place far away called Vietnam, or why we should be urged to vote for politicians who lie every time they open their mouths.
It's almost like you know people with kids in those schools and you are prepping them to ask those questions.
I know I would if I lived there.
Because of course that teacher is responsible for those things.
I've never understood why the Old Testament is associated with Christianity. The whole point of Christianity is that it's not the God from the OT. Yet that's all many supposed Christians dwell on.
I mean, even most Jews are at least somewhat embarrassed by the whole thing.. OTOH Islam is like the OT re-written by a Jew-hating schizophrenic.
OT god was an angry god. NT god was calm and cool. But he works in mysterious ways so don't try to figure it out.
Yeah - I've heard Christians talk about the NT god being so much nicer than the OT god, and then they get pissed off when you ask, "but aren't they the same god?"
You have to read about the prophesies in the new testament that Jesus was supposed to fullfil. Then go through the old testament to find all those stupid prophecies.
The entire Jesus story is about fulfilling those old testament prophecies. It's why Mary and Joseph traveled to Bethleham, it's why Jesus arrived someplace on a donkey. There are like a dozen others in there.
Oddly enough Life of Brian does a good job of showing the shitstorm going on at that time. It's probably the most accurate depiction.
Life of Brian is great!
Yet that’s all many supposed Christians dwell on.
Would you say that blacks can’t think of anything besides picking cotton, fried chicken, and singing the blues?
Because it’s written into the laws of our “Church and State are totally separate” Nation that The Good Samaritan screened people for offensive material in order to kick them off a/the platform.
Is that what you dwell on every time you use the internet? If not, why would you retard yourself into thinking that that’s all they thought? Is Dante one of these OT-obsessed backwards-thinking borderline cultist morons? Descartes? Newton?
Maybe the issue isn’t necessarily or strictly with people like Dante, Descartes, or Newton.
What the literal fuck?
I believe it was the Cathars in 11th-13th Century Europe that put forward that there were two gods, the one of the Old Testament was the evil one and the god of the New Testament the good one. Eventually the French monarchy had them mostly wiped out for blasphemy. I'm not a Christian or a believer, but that makes more sense than what most modern-day Christians believe. The evil that the god of the Old Testament commands or condones is hard to reckon with the more benevolent message of Jesus.
Just my opinion.
I’m not a Christian or a believer, but that makes more sense than what most modern-day Christians believe.
Once again, it’s bizarre how all these atheists and non-believers are able to read the minds of “most modern-day Christians” and summarize it so succinctly, and in a manner that just so happens to align with their beliefs no less.
I mean, we know for a pretty objective fact that a given computational machine cannot fully emulate two peer-level machines without losing massive amounts of information due to proxy or abstraction but, somehow, these people exceed not just the intelligence of their peers but the intelligence to contain billions of peers and even next-level thinkers spontaneously.
You’d think that, with such powers, democracy would be a snap.
Unless of course, there was a multiple-thousand year old delusion that they were falling for and that has been admonished against both within and outside Christianity for all that time... and they were just farting in the bathtub at it.
Is the mainstream view of modern-day Christianity that the Cathar position was correct? Or do modern-day Christians believe the god of the Old Testament was the god of the New Testament? You act as though I'm making this shit up. Are you arguing that most Christians think there is more than one god? No. Then stop with the bullshit argument that unless I can read the minds of Christians I can't possibly know basic tenets of the religion. I was raised Christian. My father is a retired Christian priest and chaplain. I attended a Christian school. I live in the United States, a majority-Christian nation. I don't think I need to be a mind-reader to know that Christians (excluding some tiny fringe possibly) are monotheists. Get off your high horse trying to "dunk" on someone stating obvious truths.
We don’t need to read minds. We read books. Maybe you should try it.
I get that you're allowed to have your own ideosyncratic view of your own religion but the claims above are just so very wrong. The Ten Commandments are very clearly not a "Christian text". They are a Jewish text. They were largely (though not entirely) repudiated by the New Covenant of the New Testament. To a practicing Christian, the Ten Commandments really are nothing more than a historical text.
Forget it. We’re led by retards and “informed” by retards that would fail both a 2nd grade Sunday School class *and* a 5th grade history class as well as every anatomy and biology classes along the way.
The Germans elected Hitler to bomb Pearl Harbor. Columbus discovered the world was round. The Good Samaritan was instrumental in using a higher power to silence voices he disagreed with. Trump helped the Russians steal the 2016 election. Sonograms detect electric currents and without access to coat hanger abortions, women have no rights. The vaccine is 100% safe and effective with no downsides. Even reading the 10 Commandments from a public space topples Western Civilization and condemns one to an life of vile homophobia and avoiding child sexualization that can only be redeemed by constant, active and enthusiastic participation in homosexual activity even despite COVID, HIV, and monkeypox. Israel is genociding Palestinians. Joe Biden is both fully competent and the strategic choice to defeat the felonious ex dictator, Donald J. Trump.
You are right that they came from Judaism, but the Ten Commandments were never "repudiated", they all still apply to Christians.
However, the ceremonial laws of Leviticus were dropped, and the emphasis is on forgiveness, instead of the punishments in Deuteronomy.
District court will order summary judgement for the plaintiffs. Appellate court will decline to hear an appeal. Why do these idiots insist on reinventing a wheel that always falls off the axle?
Have you seen society these days?
https://notthebee.com/article/san-franciscos-pride-parade-involved-men-performing-sex-acts-in-public-men-urinating-on-other-men-and-men-proudly-defending-their-right-to-be-naked-in-front-of-kids
Best reason yet to get rid of public schools entirely. No way governments can force any private school to display the Ten Commandments, or teach CRT, or make kids read books about LGBTQ+ crap. If you want them to learn this stuff, you will be free to find a school that teaches it.
Does the law specify which version of the 10 commandments? Not many people realise that each of the Abrahamic religions has a different version. There are even different versions among mainstream branches of Christianity.
I'm in favor of branding any politician, who cites the Ten Commandments and cannot tell you which version he is using, with "IDIOT" on the forehead.
And as far as I can tell, that is every single one that wants to require publicly posting the Ten Commandments.
"This is an obvious attempt to use our public schools to convert kids to Christianity.
The Ten Commandments are originally from Judaism, and are also recognized by Christians and Muslims.
It’s a Jewish conspiracy! Next thing you know they’re going to be firing space lasers. /s
I stopped reading after "We live in a democracy, not a theocracy"
How can you take someone who says that seriously? They are an idiot or a con man who thinks they are speaking to idiots.
If we live in a democracy then you can't overturn this law.
Overturning this law is in fact, overthrowing democracy.
How about this?
THE SECULAR TEN COMMANDMENTS
1: Be open-minded and be willing to alter your beliefs with new evidence.
2: Strive to understand what is most likely to be true, not to believe what you wish to be true.
3: The scientific method is the most reliable way of understanding the natural world.
4: Every person has the right to control of their body.
5: God is not necessary to be a good person or to live a full and meaningful life.
6: Be mindful of the consequences of all your actions and recognize that you must take responsibility for them.
7: Treat others as you would want them to treat you, and can reasonably expect them to want to be treated. Think about their perspective.
8: We have the responsibility to consider others, including future generations.
9: There is no one right way to live.
10: Leave the world a better place than you found it.
Hahahahaha!! Talk about proving the Christian's correct!
The goal of the secular world is to destroy God and replace Him with yourself. This was Satan's opening act. Eat this fruit, and you will be like God. And they did, and in doing so revealed something about themselves - and by extension every man and woman on the planet who would ever come to exist:
That they lacked humility towards something greater than themselves.
It was Pride. The devil's first and favorite sin.
Your silly little list there is literally a prideful attempt to rewrite the Law of Moses, handed down by God Himself - and replace it with your own. And with #7 in particular, you then try to rewrite Jesus' Golden Rule - which you can't possibly follow if you deny His Greatest Commandment which encapsulates all of Mosaic law and prophecy.
Because you deny God your love, soul, and heart - and instead declare yourself god, instead of God Himself. And you cry that you don't need a Savior, because you're your own savior. Pride.
The ONLY commandment of the secular world is and always has been: if it feels good, do it.
And in abiding by that singular commandment, secularists deny and deprive themselves of EVERYTHING God offers: love, truth, beauty, goodness, righteousness. All these things that are synonymous with God Himself.
And what's left for you after that? Hate. Evil. Nothingness. Emptiness. Pride, gluttony, envy, lust, greed, wrath, and sloth. And the only thing any of it ever accomplishes is ruin.
Look at our society. Look at our world. Look at its fall, as people now reject that which made it possible; which the Founders relied upon to make it possible; and try - and fail - to replace it with something of their own design.
The Ten Commandments on display is not evangelizing (what I'M doing right now is evangelizing) or comingling Church and State. It's a symbol. It's a reminder of a fundamental truth of our existence; one that came long, long before us - and will be here long after we leave. Even if you have no faith, even if you don't believe a lick of Judeo-Christianity, even if you are vehemently against them - you don't need an ounce of religion to be taught this. It's a reminder for the faithful and secular alike, if they hope to live and proper in a functioning and productive society:
You are not your own god, and you never will be.
To quote Cousin Vinny, “Everything this guy said is bullshit. Thank you."
You leftists. Always with half the story, firing off before reaching the end.
"Counselor's entire opening statement, with the exception of "Thank you" will be stricken from the record."
Which illustrates how Vinny's character - who you're substituting for yourself here - has no clue what he's doing or saying. Which is the same for you.
But it's interesting. You called all of it BS. Meaning, you must be one of them - one of those poor, hateful, empty souls who think they're their own god. Have you ever looked at your own miserable life, where you are now and wonder how you got there?
Doesn't mean you have to be though.
And if I don't be open-minded and willing to alter my beliefs with new evidence, what are you going to do? Paradoxically, secular God complex at me harder?
Nothing. Nothing at all. We aren't going to force you to give up your superstitions. Forcing people to comply with religious ideology is a feature on monotheism.
Oh the cross cultists are going to hate you.
Does this mean taking down pictures of Dear Leader Obama and Saint Joe Biden?
"Those who don't believe in the state's official religious doctrine will be to [sic] made to feel like outcasts who don't belong in their own school community."
Join the club!
They bought their home in the Bible Belt. They knew what they were getting into. I say, let them bathe in the fire and brimstone