Bryan Caplan: How Regulation Makes Housing More Expensive
Moving is no longer a viable way to grow your wealth in the U.S., says the author of Build, Baby, Build.

Bryan Caplan is known for his unconventional approach to tackling big issues. With his latest book, Build, Baby, Build: The Science and Ethics of Housing Regulation, he employs a graphic novel format to make the case for a more open approach to housing policy, partnering with illustrator Ady Branzei. It's his second venture into the world of illustrated narratives, following 2019's Open Borders: The Science and Ethics of Immigration. Reason's Christian Britschgi asked Caplan about his motivations and his outlook on the future of the "yes in my backyard" (YIMBY) movement.
Q: Why make the case for more housing in a graphic novel form?
A: There is so much high-quality research out there on the topic, and yet almost no one would ever read it because most of it's really boring. Honestly, I'm just looking for some way of getting other people interested. The main pitch that I've been giving for this book when someone just gives me 20 seconds is, "I've written the most fascinating book that has ever been written on housing regulation."
Q: You argue that ending most zoning and building regulations would impact many other problems we are all concerned about. What are some examples of that?
A: I start off with the basics, which is that housing regulation has greatly inflated the price of housing, and deregulation would get the price of housing back down. This is such a large part of the typical person's budget that getting the price of housing down by 50 percent [makes] a big difference in overall standard of living.
This means that there would be a lot of additional employment for people in the construction industry. A demographic that has done really badly in the past few decades [is] noncollege males. Well, that's basically the main kind of people that work in the construction industry.
This one is subtle and fun. There's a traditional path of upward mobility that Americans used to have: Move from wherever you are and go to the highest-wage parts of the country. This doesn't work anymore. Housing prices have gotten so high in what we call our gold rush areas of the country that they eat up more than 100 percent of the wage gains you get. It is still true that you can get a raise by moving to the high-wage parts of the country. The problem is that now that wage gain is less than the housing cost, it's no longer a viable route out of poverty.
Q: Your book presents big cities as bright, fun, futuristic places. How much of the arguments from NIMBYs ("not in my backyard") do you think is mostly about aesthetics?
A: I was very mindful of the fact that for a lot of people it's just the aesthetics that are bothering them. So what I wanted to do in this book was to fight aesthetics with aesthetics and say, "Look, you're so convinced it's going to look bad. Let me get my artist to go and draw it looking good, and maybe that will open up your mind."
Frédéric Bastiat said that so much of the case for government is based upon looking at what's seen and ignoring what's unseen. I think this really goes for housing regulation. If you're looking at something that's really nice, it's easy to believe we wouldn't want to tamper with this perfection. Is it perfect though? Is it really true that we have achieved the pinnacle of aesthetics in this particular neighborhood on this particular day? Let's imagine other ways that could look.
Q: Would you describe yourself as optimistic on this issue? Do you think the YIMBY case will win meaningfully when it comes to changing policy?
A: I'm a conditional optimist. The policies work wonders. I can't say that I'm really optimistic about it winning. Of course, I love the idea that my book will start a political avalanche and everybody will read it and people wave it on the floor of Congress and 50 state legislatures. There's actually a panel in the book where every Supreme Court justice is reading my book. Look, I can dream.
This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"There's actually a panel in the book where every Supreme Court justice is reading my book. Look, I can dream."
I have a dream in which stupid self-righteous pussy-grabbers STOP allowing themselves to be grabbed right smack dab in the middle of their big fat pussy-grabbers, by the pussy-grabber-grabbers, by which I mean politicians that MILK our self-righteousness and power piggery, to enable them to Lord shit over us!!!
Hey conservatives!!! How about a “Grand Compromise”? Y’all give up your “abortion boners”, in exchange for lib-tards giving up their “gun boners”?
This looks like a prime opportunity for me to explain a few things I’ve learned on this planet, while becoming a geezer. A few things, that is, about human nature, and excessive self-righteousness, tribalism, the “rush to judge” others, and the urge to punish.
“Team R” politician: “The debt is too large, and government is too powerful. If you elect ME, I will FIX that budget-balance problem SOON! But, first things first! THOSE PEOPLE OVER THERE ARE GETTING ABORTIONS!!! We must make the liberals CRY for their sins! AFTER we fix that RIGHT AWAY, we’ll get you your budget balanced and low taxes!”
“Team D” politician: “The debt is too large, and I’ll get that fixed soon, I promise you, if you elect ME! First, the more important stuff, though: THOSE PEOPLE OVER THERE ARE OWNING GUNS!!! We must PROTECT the American People from guns and gun-nuts!!! AFTER we fix that RIGHT AWAY, we’ll get our budgets balanced!”
And then we gripe and gripe as Government Almighty grows and grows, and our freedoms shrink and shrink. And somehow, the budget never DOES get balanced!
Now LISTEN UP for the summary: Parasites and politicians (but I repeat myself) PUSSY GRAB US ALL by grabbing us by… Guess what… by our excessive self-righteousness, tribalism, the “rush to judge” others, and the urge to PUNISH-PUNISH-PUNISH those “wrong” others! Let’s all STOP being such fools, and STOP allowing the politicians OF BOTH SIDES from constantly pussy-grabbing us all, right in our urge to… Pussy-grab the “enemies”, which is actually ALL OF US (and our freedoms and our independence, our ability to do what we want, without getting micro-managed by parasites)!!!
Shorter and sweeter: The pussy-grabbers are actually pussy-grabber-grabbers, grabbing us all in our pussy-grabbers. Let us all (as best as we can) AMPUTATE our OWN nearly-useless-anyways pussy-grabbers, and the pussy-grabber-grabbers will NOT be able to abuse us all NEARLY ass much ass these assholes are doing right now!
Or do you ENJOY seeing extra tax money of yours endlessly wasted ass BOTH SIDES pussy-grab each other in grandstanding maneuvers that actually do us no good whatsoever?
The likes of Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer and Ron DeSatan spend OODLES of taxpayer dollars “making the libs cry” with UDDERLY stupid KulturKampf wars (“Drag Queen Shows” cum to mind), while said Libs spend OUR money getting their panties in a wad concerning should-be-free speech (“trigger warnings” etc. for the snowflakes) on campuses. And ONLY brilliant geniuses like me can actually see that we’re all, collectively, getting abused by letting the political pussy-grabber-grabbers, grab us by our pussy-grabbers!!! WTF will it take for us to WAKE THE FUCK UP?!?!?
You people are too stupid and too self-righteous to even see your stupidity and self-righteousness. I pity the fools! Keep right on letting the parasitical politicians grab you by Your Perfect Pussy-Grabbers, then, You Perfect FOOLS, and SUFFER the effects of your foolishness, till MAYBE one day ye will wake up!!!
The collectivist pussy-grabbers of BOTH SIDES reveal their evil, stupid, self-righteous pussy-grabbing… By pussy-grabbing each other, all day, every day! And their “leaders” abuse us all day, every day, by grabbing us all, right in our self-righteous pussy-grabbers, while we’d ALL be MUCH better off amputating our own useless pussy-grabbers!
Grasshopper... Learn to RENOUNCE your pussy-grabber (give UP on "making the libs cry"), and the pussy-grabber-grabbers will no longer be able to abuse you thereby!
Unread
Ignorant and PROUD of shit! PROUD of being grabbed GOOD AND HARD right smack dab in the middle of yer big fat self-righteous tribalistically smug pussy-grabber!!!! PROUD of getting sorely abused by the pussy-grabber-grabbers!
The shame of shit all is that NON self-righteous people (innocent people) get grabbed by YOUR ugly politicians!!! Whose reeking fires YOU feed!! SHAME ON YOU AND YOURS!!!
Read ... and you're still try pegging [R]'s will all the debt while the [D]'s wrote, pitched and unanimously passed all of the last 4 massive spending bills. Then infer to blame Trump entirely for the Abortion-bans while he's actually Pro-Choice and totally again infer that Trump didn't pass Tax-Cuts. Republican voters polled to have majority support for Roe v Wade. Heck Republicans wrote Roe v Wade.
So lets talk about your "Grand Compromise". The Republicans are already supporting your compromise and it's just [D] that isn't. Your only conflict is in your own biases.
Your points are valid! While there has been SOME pro-abortion progress by "Team R" lately, which also does deserve credit for trying to scale back regulations... Trump has done MUCH damage recently to "Team R", by not fully supporting democracy and free trade (Team "D" does no better than "R" on the latter issue, yes). How about ALL sides give up power-grabbing, towards SMALLER government! Let's get small!!!
The USA is not a democracy.
De-Regulating and Cutting-Taxes on trade is Free’er trade.
(Oh did you mean 'free' trade or special-privilege for certain trade?)
In the realm of Constitutional democracy. Trump did leave those items to Congress more-so than any other. As-if the [D]’s endless list of E.O.’s didn’t establish that fact or the fact that the Reciprocal Tariff Act (Giving Presidents sole authority over Tariffs) was passed during the FDR Administration and a [D]-trifecta.
Perhaps the repeal of the UN-Constitutional Reciprocal Tariff Act is what you’re really after and I’d bet the mass resistance to that will be from the [D] politicians; but hey. It’s a place to start and good one at that.
"This is such a large part of the typical person's budget that getting the price of housing down by 50 percent [makes] a big difference in overall standard of living."
What would happen to the banking system under such a scenario?
What caused the most recent financial crisis?
^BINGO. The plan to have ?free? loans destroyed the pricing.
Just as it did with healthcare, education and ton of other ?free? sh*t.
'Guns' don't make sh*t!
What caused the most recent financial crisis?
Depends on which one. Government intervention into the mortage business, pushing subprime interest rates or Government intervention due to Covid, printing money so they can pay people not to work?
Big cities aren’t bright and fun places. Possibly “futuristic,” but not bright and fun. Those local urban governments are so leveraged due to the public sector pension costs and their exorbitant coerced public education system that the high price tag of new housing is essential to keep the property taxes high. Move away from the expensive, crowded, crumbling, polluted, crime infested, and diseased urban areas if you value liberty. Yes, they might have food trucks and you’ll have to sacrifice…
But cities are so bright and fun in the movies, at least the ones without apocalyptic ruins and zombies.
Why isn't the movement of retirees to lower cost areas mitigating the bidding up of prices for wage earners in the high wage areas?
Can you give an example of retirees moving to lower cost areas?
Reason... Closed minds retard writers
And all the problems point to exactly the same thing.
A Constitutional USA versus a [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire. There was never any Constitutional Authority for an EPA, OSHA, FHA, HUD, FHFA —- They’re *ALL* illegal Nazi-Agencies.
You don't get to keep a USA while ignoring what a USA is.
The FBI just raided Cortland Management in Atlanta as part of an antitrust probe into national price fixing of the rental market. But please tell us more about how we need less regulation. The fuck.
And what year did that broken law get passed?
There is a difference between ensuring Liberty and Justice for all and taking away people's Liberty and acting unjustly. That day government started working for criminals.
Why would a bank lend, an investor invest in a depreciating ROI, or worse unable to meet breakeven costs? Why would there be more investment in supply if ROI was in a state of degrowth?
Do tell oh wise central planning bureaucrat one?
'Q: Why make the case for more housing in a graphic novel form?
A: There is so much high-quality research out there on the topic, and yet almost no one would ever read it because most of it's really boring.'
Bryan, do you mean no one with any IQ, reading skills, or work ethic?
Or did you have a really buzzed weekend before you made the format decision?
'You argue that ending most zoning and building regulations would impact many other problems we are all concerned about. What are some examples of that?'
Do favelas, shanty towns, and ghettoes in any country or city with dreamy libertarian housing laws?
Strawman. Lets go with something stronger. Maryland mandates sprinkler systems in single family housing. Adds over $10k to the cost of a new house. Insurance reductions doesn't offset the increased cost. Why mandate it?
Let me ask people with a no-zoning boner: would it be acceptable to libertarians for private land developers to sell individual building lots with strict design rules, as long as all buyers willingly signed contracts accepting those rules?
I do believe those ‘private’ rules (HOA’s) are the very point of getting rid of Government Zoning Boners. Why would State and City central planners be making better choices in neighborhoods they live miles away from? The more local these neighborhood ‘rules’ are represented the better that representation will be. Not everyone can afford or even wants to live inside gated rich communities – what gives central planners the right to demand standards on everyone’s own property by the end of a Gov-Gun? Let their be as much CHOICE as there can reasonably be.
If you want control over the whole neighborhood you can BUY all that you want to control or else enter into an agreement with those neighbors. Zoning control is just a way to take 'ownership' rights away by poking Gov-Guns at them.