Elementary Schools Ban Tag, Football, and Fun During Recess
"It really feels as though maybe we've lost touch with what's developmentally appropriate," says one Montgomery County mom.

A mom recently went to her daughter's Maryland elementary school to ask why the kids aren't allowed to play tag at recess—or even to close their eyes.
"We'd recently transferred from another district and my daughter was taken aback by how many rules there were," said the mom, whose name is being kept private to protect her identity.
There are indeed a lot of rules at the girl's new school—four typed pages of them. The mom found this out after the school administrator handed her a copy of the "Montgomery County Public Schools Playground Supervision Recess Procedures for Playground Aides." It states, among other things:
- Baseball and football games are not permitted at any time.
- Haphazard running, chasing and tag games on the blacktop are not permitted.
- A student may not begin to swing on rings and bars until the student ahead of him/her has finished.
Once they do swing or climb, they must use an "opposed thumb grip." (As opposed to their teeth?)
The rules also instruct playground aides to "caution children if it appears that emotions and excitement are mounting to a point where incorrect actions may soon result."
After the mom sent me the rules, I contacted the Montgomery County office in charge of recess safety. They did not respond.
"It really feels as though maybe we've lost touch with what's developmentally appropriate," the mom told me.
An administrator who met with the mom explained that the school's primary job is to keep children safe at all times. The mom disagrees; a school's primary job is to teach children and avoid interfering with their development.
Boston College Psychology Professor Peter Gray feels similarly.
"These rules demonstrate no trust at all of the children, nor even of the playground supervisors," says Gray, a co-founder of my non-profit, Let Grow. "When we treat people as irresponsible, they become irresponsible."
The mom said she felt a bit sorry for the administrator, who had no say in these rules. (Just like the kids.) And she added that today's children really do seem a little rough when they play tag—probably because they've had so little practice at it.
I have heard this from other people who work with children, especially occupational therapist Angela Hanscom, who notes that when kids don't move enough, they fail to develop proprioception, the ability to know where their body is in space and how much force it needs to do something physical.
All the more reason to let kids start adjusting to each other in the easiest, most natural way possible: through play.
In his new book, The Anxious Generation, Jonathan Haidt recommends bringing more play into kids' lives by keeping Friday afternoons free so kids can play in the neighborhood. He also recommends that schools stay open before or after school for mixed-age free play in a no-phone zone: what we call a "Let Grow Play Club." (Haidt is another co-founder of Let Grow. Our Play Club materials are here, for free.)
Depriving kids of play in the name of safety is dangerous. Even more dangerous than two kids using the climbing rings at once.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Guess smear the queer is a non-starter.
Yeah, but they can play pap smear the queer at drag queen story time.
No that one is actually still allowed, teachers like buttplug play it with awkward students all the time
Heh. I had the same thought. Recess was pretty fucking amazing when I was in elementary school now that I think of it. A few hundred kids spread over 3 or 4 acres, spontaneously organized games of soccer, kickball, dodgeball and "smear the queer". And proper hard, metal playground equipment. I can't imagine how dreary it all must be now.
Or nigger pile.
(Maybe it was a detroit thing.)
Nope, heard that often in Iowa. Now we use pig pile.
Northeast New England had it. Never heard of Smear the Queer, though until someone brought it up a few years ago. Red Rover, King of The Mountain played on the giant snow pile from plowing the parking lot. They put the snow pile there on purpose for us.
The adults are going to soon be playing a very different version of that game in the near future, in large part because the schools started introducing actual queers to the curriculum for no educational purpose whatsoever.
Im not even super old, and we were still doing wild shit when I was a kid.
The snow plows would clear the pavement and create a huge snow mountain. This fucking thing was like 4-8 feet high depending on how bad we got hit. We would legit suplex each other off of it, do flips off of it, king of the mountain where we just beat the shit out of each other. We would have a teacher outside smoking reading a magazine watching this.
"Boys will be boys" isnt a taught thing, its evolution. Replacing this with "everything is toxic masculinity" is why everyone is miserable.
Toxic masculinity outed itself after the LP sold the Supreme Court its Roe v Wade plank in 1973. Prohibition Party wankers demanded a Konstatooshunal Amindment to force women into involuntary servitude as cannon-fodder breeding dams. Mystical brainwashing snowballed this creepy throwback until Trump was able to pack the court with Christian National Socialists and bring back the Fugitive Slave Law. Good thing there's a 19th Amendment not even Long Dong and Palito can ignore!
Roe v Wade was bad law. It doesn't matter what right is was creating, it's not the pervue of the Federal Government to do that. As much as States Rights is maligned by whichever side is in power it needed to be applied in the case of Roe v Wade.
I agree that the governmen't shouldnt be getting involved in medical decisions or any kind, be they for men, women or children. Not because I think abortion is a wonderful thing but because that is not what any level of government should have power over. Sure some bad stuff may slip through the cracks now and again but unlike the right wing nuts here I prefer 100 guilty people go free than 1 innocent person be punished for a crime they didn't commit.
You literally just contradicted yourself.
States Rights are political powers held for state governments. Obviously you don’t “agree that the government shouldn’t be getting involved”.
SCOTUS or State Constitutional courts are the very means of protecting Individual Rights (Keeping gov from destroying them). Yes; it is literally their job to do this. Yes; that is exactly what the Roe v Wade ‘court ruling’ stated; was that Government wasn’t allowed to get involved pre-viable.
Pretending that Constitutions are ‘Federal’ Legislation literally destroys the very checks and balances system that ensures Individual Rights.
Summarized: Roe v Wade IS-NOT legislative 'law'. It's a 'court ruling' on the Constitutional ability for legislative law to be involved.
You're literally defeating your own stated stance.
"You literally just contradicted yourself.
States Rights are political powers held for state governments. Obviously you don’t “agree that the government shouldn’t be getting involved”."
No, he didn't contradict himself. He correctly noted that, under the US Constitution, there is no Federal right to get an abortion and any laws governing abortion need to be passed at the State level. He then further said that in his opinion, it is bad policy for government at any level to regulate or forbid abortion.
No. Read above, Yeho did a fine job explaining the English language for you.
"I agree that the government shouldn't be getting involved in medical decisions of any kind"
So you oppose laws requiring prescriptions for powerful and dangerous medications? In the absence of such laws, I could make the medical decision to take morphine, which I've heard ha some useful properties. The government is interfering in my medical decision!
Do you oppose any effort to regulate the competence of surgeons or the cleanliness of clinics? That interferes with my ability to choose my surgeon or clinic freely. If I want to be operated on by Cousin Jim on the kitchen counter using a steak knife, that's between me and my doctor, Jim!
Do you believe that government has no role to play in funding medical care? Clearly, I will make different decisions about my medical care if government will pay for it than if I have to pay for it myself, directly or through private insurance.
I notice that one of the arguments I've most frequently heard for legal abortion is that then it can be regulated and safe, carried out by competent personnel in proper clinics with good quality equipment. Of course, if government should have no involvement with medical decisions of any kind, then all that goes away.
Are you entirely sure that's where you want to end up?
Have you ever talked to libertarians before?
First off, thank you for the reasoned questions and not lowering yourself to name calling. I will try to keep to the same level.
First off, let me say I oppose the "Guild Socialism" of the AMA. They have the power to say who gets to practice medicine and cut all other options out of the market. Thus contributing very limited competition in the medical market which drives up prices.
At most the AMA should be providing the service of inspecting medical facilities and providing a rating on the quality of services and cleanliness of facilities. Even then they should have to compete with other private grading organizations.
Thus customers could chose between different qualities of care if their budget can't handle the top end. Most bankruptcies in the US start off with a medical crisis actually covered by insurance because there is no competition in the medical market and prices are set as high as insurance companies will pay.
Government mandates cause most of the high costs of medicine often providing no benefit or very limited benefit. Mandating certain levels of cleaning in facilities is a good example of the cause of a cost increase.
A business will maintain a good level of cleanliness no matter the product. My lawyers office is as clean as my nephrologists. No one needs to tell my lawyer that a clean office is good for business. I doubt that without mandate doctors will keep their offices very clean. I doubt that will be where they save money.
I think that the customer should be able to chose the price point they are willing to pay for services thus reintroducing competition into the market and reducing prices.
If you have a bad cold you don't need the AAA rated ear, nose and throat surgeon to look at you. The C rated general practitioner should suffice for a strep throat test.
As a general rule unregulated markets aren't much different in practice as heavily regulated ones. They maintain standards that customers expect. Also if customers start getting loathsome plagues from visiting certain places regulated or not word will spread and business will suffer.
Specifically Catholics —
Gorsuch was raised Catholic.
Kavanaugh; Catholic.
Barrett; Catholic.
From the mid-19th century down to 1964 Catholics were solidly Democrats, sometimes at the 80–90% level.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_politics_in_the_United_States
The Pro-Life movements very creation was out of the Democrat Party.
Republicans wrote Roe v Wade.
Ok. How is that relevant to today?
At the intersection of safetyism and an absolute aversion to any potential for liability, plus a committee of peers ["so you're ok with kids literally killing each other at recess?"] and this is what you get.
Why do you think they call them "progressives?"
There was a purpose for recess it was to let the kids, particularly boys, run around and ware off some of their energy. Running around is a critical element. Whether it is tag football, baseball, soccer kids need to run. They need to end recess tired and ready to sit for a while and listen. There are far too many kids, boys particularly being drugged to keep still when a good twenty minutes of running could achieve the same effect.
Yup.
By now Lenore must have realized that the WHOLE POINT of the repressive looter kleptocracy is the War On Fun.
Puritans
today's children really do seem a little rough when they play tag—probably because they've had so little practice at it.
Boys who do not experience rough play at an early age are more likely to grow up to be violent men with poor emotional control. Boys need to practice moderating their behavior when they're "worked up". Rough play is how they practice.
I dunno. Those rings look a helluva lot more dangerous than any ballgame or playing tag.
So I'm thinking maybe it's the competition they might be trying to eliminate. Though kids can make anything a competition.
You're not wrong. My 5 year old grandaughter likes to turn everything into a "race". She was riding her bike in a parking lot and I was waking along with her. Every time she got to the end of the lot before me, which was every time, she would scream with joy that she "won".
I expect the school will try to beat that out of her when she starts kindergarten in the fall. My son and I have tried to convince her mother that homeschooling would be better, we promiced to teach them history, economics, math and science. Still no good. She's stubborn.
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1795874210104893829?t=MweG_RIlLQDShnM1jlh4hw&s=19
BREAKING: A manhunt is underway in Washington for several suspects who "desecrated" a Spokane pride mural.
City leaders held a conference on the UNSPEAKABLE tragedy of the mural.
Some leaders broke down and cried:
[Video]
This is why you can’t have chicks in charge.
Marxist chicks. Spokane’s mayor, Lisa Brown, taught Soviet economic theory in Nicaragua under the Sandinistas.
My first grade school playground was non-lethal anarchy. Cops 'n Robbers was OK but you couldn't play Hang The Horse Thief. Ayn Rand's husband played a bit part in "Three On A Match." The 1932 movie starts with happy WW1-era grade school playground scenes. It then segues into Herbert Hoover-Harry Anslinger prohibition-generated gangsterism, opiate addiction, kidnappings and disorganized crime.
I thought maybe you played "Repeal the Comstock Act". Or "Hang Anthony Comstock".
"Elementary Schools Ban Tag, Football, and Fun During Recess."
However drag queen shows, introducing failed Marxist policies and failing to teach kids how to read, write and cipher rudimentary arithmetic is acceptable in America's public education indoctrination centers.
Ask me again why I'm against public education.
Having fun is a high-risk activity.
ban elementary schools.
Depriving kids of play in the name of safety is dangerous. Even more dangerous than two kids using the climbing rings at once...
"The good old days when America was 'great' aren't the 1950s...They're whatever decade you were 11"
When was the last time you saw a hotel pool with a diving board instead of some unused, expensive, decrepit lift the hotel is forced to provide in case someone paralyzed years ago by a mishap with a hotel diving board, wants to get a swim in? No one, not even a progressive, will look at first quarter of the 21st century as "the good old days".
No one, not even a progressive, will look at first quarter of the 21st century as “the good old days”.
Not the real first quarter anyway. Minecraft, Fortnite, etc., were a great escape for at least the first couple of iterations.
[facepalm]
I distinctly remember a first grade monkey bar incident. One of the boys stated " hey, if you hang upside down you can see up the girls dresses" who were sitting on top of the monkey bars. Recess was cut short that day for the boys. I only considered doing it but realized the trouble I would get in.
More recently, my daughter was banned from the monkey bars when she was six. She would come home from school with blisters on her hands from swinging around on the bars. She stated (as a six year old) "I want to do the monkey bars as a job when I grow up." It didn't quite work out that way.
I dunno man, maybe me and my friends were different, but there was a pretty wide gap between the age where we were on monkey bars and when anyone even talked about / considered looking up girls dresses. Specifically I remember the first guy who confessed having a crush on the popular girl in class early on (maybe 3rd grade?) got made fun of pretty harshly for it. "What you like girls, are you GAY or something?!"
Not trying to poke holes for poking holes sake, but that level of interest in sneaking a peak at genitals is really something that is pretty non-existent at that age of developement. If you told me this was a middle school thing I would buy it
It was the naughtiness of the whole thing. There's always one doing something stupid, even in 1st grade.
Dude, it wasn't 'sneaking a peek at genitals'.
It was 'I see London, I see France, I can see your underparts'
Giggly embarrassment.
And I can see the boys getting in trouble if one kid managed to get enough of them to do it.
I remember kissing a girl in kindergarten. Had to sit in the corner. Always took a nap in the middle of the morning. The teacher would pick two kids and they had a wand with a star on the end and when nap was over they got to walk around tapping the kids to wake them up. Me and my best friend did it one day and the kids we didn't like got whanged in the head. Teacher wouldn't let us do it again.
Wow, all I remember from Kindergarten is my teacher wore blouses so sheer you could see he bra underneath. The rest is a blur... all the way to... well... Junior High I suppose.
That mother should be tried for child abuse taking her daughter to Montgomery county MD. let alone enrolling her in a public school there.
No job is worth that.
Correct and a second charge for allowing her child in a Montgomery County public school.
May I offer instead my AT County Public Schools Playground Supervision Recess Procedures for Playground Aides?
- Nobody likes a crybaby.
- Nobody likes a tattletale.
- Rub some dirt on it, kid.
- *arrows on a map from the playground to the nurse's office*
Maybe Mom can just go next door to the other competing school?
Oh whoops; The government-gods made sure that wasn't a possibility didn't they.
'The people' really should've asked themselves centuries ago how government-mandated curriculum for kids was any better than government-ran media/press for adults.
Pro Public Education advocate signs should've read, "Government-ran media ... It's for the kids!" /s
Safety Third!
the initial few sentences had my jaw dropping and then I read "Montgomery County Public Schools", at which point I thought "well, that explains everything." what a bunch of NIMBY, nanny, self-important, whinging, pearl-clutching prigs.
Maryland has been fucked up since Lincoln held their legislature at gunpoint to keep them from leaving the union.