Review: Fun Police Podcast Exposes the Nanny State
Don't trust the do-gooders campaigning against drinking, smoking, and gambling.

It's a fairly well-established principle that the state can intervene when an individual harms another person: Your right to swing your fist ends when it hits my face. But what about when someone's actions harm only themselves?
For some, that's another opportunity for the government to get involved. They're the "fun police," constantly using public policy to nudge, cajole, or outright force you to accept their idea of a healthy, moral lifestyle. In a new limited-run podcast series produced by the Consumer Choice Center, a group that opposes paternalism in various forms, co-hosts Bill Wirtz and Yaël Ossowski turn a skeptical eye toward the do-gooders and nanny-staters who campaign against drinking, smoking, gambling, and more.
Wirtz, Ossowski, and their guests trace the roots of modern neo-prohibitionist movements to the Anti-Saloon League, which laid out the blueprint followed by public scolds today. Bankrolled by the Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Ford families, the League helped turn the "once-fringe moral movement" of alcohol prohibition into a "social force that dominated political life" and culminated in the 18th Amendment (and disaster). The same model is still deployed today, with wealthy funders such as former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg backing efforts to ban products from vape pens to Big Gulps.
Fun Police veers between practical examples of nanny statism and deeper discussions about the role of the state. It makes a compelling case for letting people live freely, even if that comes with a little risk.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Fun Police."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I ain't never had Too Much Fun.
Where can we get it? I might actually be willing to pay a little for it.
Oh. Correct spelling helps. Googling "Community Choice Center" got me adult day care and food pantries. "Consumer Choice Center" got me to the right place, plus critics who think they're just covert arms of Big Tobacco or maybe Big Liquor.
As always in such cases, the anti-saloon league was rooted in the abuse of women who had no significant rights to protect themselves against abusive husbands, many of whom were alcoholics. It was plausible, as women started gaining the power to organize and protest, to blame the alcohol itself and the places that served the alcohol to them. And again, as always, alcohol was simply a convenient target for the movement. The problem, of course, was women without rights, not alcohol, or alcoholic abusive husbands. And the solution, of course, was equal rights for women and criminal charges against the husbands who abused them, not banning alcohol.
Mystical bigots are into prophesy. "If you bait my envy by doing (victimless fun) Jesus will make (unspecified) bad things happen to you." So to make this come true, bigots importune politicians to order cops to kick in your door, plant something and shoot, jail or rob and beat you. This entitles them to say "See? See? I toldja somethin' bad wuz gonna happen."