Brussels Mayor Attempts To Shut Down National Conservatism Conference by Force
It's a good thing opponents of the move can appeal to the liberal values of free speech, free association, and equal treatment under law.

*UPDATE: "In a late-night emergency decision, the Belgian Court has struck down state censorship" and ruled that NatCon Brussels 2 may go on "without police interference," according to ADF International.
This is not how leaders of a free society behave.
At 7:29 Eastern time this morning, the @NatConTalk account on the website formerly known as Twitter reported that police in Brussels, Belgium, had arrived at the site of the second Brussels-based National Conservatism Conference "with an order to shut NatCon down for creating a public disturbance." An English translation of the order shared by a lawyer cites the fact that participants are from the "conservative and religious right" and that they express a "'Eurosceptic' attitude" as reasons for prohibiting the two-day event.
The document also claims that "it cannot be ruled out that…extremist groups are associating themselves with this event" and that the conference "could undeniably lead to violent reactions." It is signed by Emir Kir, mayor of the Saint-Josse-ten-Nood municipality and a member of Belgium's Socialist Party.
Police didn't, in the end, break up Day 1 of the NatCon Brussels 2 program, but they did prevent anyone not already inside, including scheduled speakers, from entering the venue, according to subsequent posts from organizers and attendees. They also attempted to halt all food and beverage deliveries, according to reports from people on the ground.
Organizers have initiated a legal challenge to the shut-down order, according to @NatConTalk. "There is no public disturbance and no grounds to shut down a gathering of politicians, intellectuals, journalists, students, civic leaders, and concerned citizens," the account added. The Alliance Defending Freedom's international arm has announced it will back the effort.
This afternoon, a group of right-of-center figures that includes several Reason contributors released an open letter "condemn[ing] in the strongest possible terms the Belgian authorities' attempts to shut down, without due process, the National Conservatism Conference underway in Brussels." It notes that the signatories object to the attempt despite fundamental disagreements with the natcon worldview. "We say this as critics of national conservatism, not allies," the document reads. "Indeed, we believe that national conservatism as a political and ideological movement is profoundly mistaken, both empirically and normatively, on most fronts."
The signatories rightly observe that "the use of public authority and police force to shut down peaceful conferences and public meetings is anathema to a free and open society." Ironically, the shut-down attempt is an excellent example of the error-has-no-rights ethos sometimes voiced on the New Right, which includes figures with connections to the natcon movement. It is a political approach that runs directly contrary to the liberal ideal of equal rights under law (to say nothing of the liberal commitments to free speech and free association).
A long post from conference organizer Yoram Hazony yesterday evening explained that NatCon Brussels 2 had already been relocated twice following pressure from local officials.
The National Conservatism Conference will go ahead in Brussels today (Tuesday) despite frantic and continuing efforts by Brussels officials to cancel it at the last minute.
Some 600 participants are arriving this morning to hear speeches from the former MEP Nigel Farage, the… pic.twitter.com/PNPxQvZHQM
— Yoram Hazony (@yhazony) April 15, 2024
"Last Friday, the Concert Noble venue which had hosted the 2022 NatCon conference cancelled this year's event following an intervention by the Socialist Party mayor of Brussels, Philippe Close," the post reads. "Yesterday (Monday) the replacement venue, the Sofitel Brussels…broke its written contract citing objections from people involved in the European Union Council who would be staying at the hotel. The Mayor of Etterbeek Vincent de Wolf (MR) yesterday boasted to The Brussels Times that he was responsible for the Sofitel cancellation."
After issuing today's order, Kir declared explicitly that "in Etterbeek, Brussels City and Saint-Josse, the far right is not welcome." Controversial European right-wingers, including Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, French politician Éric Zemmour, and British politician Nigel Farage, were on the lineup for the confab.
Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo has since weighed in with a post calling today's shut-down attempt unacceptable. "Banning political meetings is unconstitutional," he wrote. "Full stop."
NatCon Brussels 2 is affiliated with the U.S.-based National Conservatism Conference (which I wrote about critically in 2019) and NatCon 3 (which I wrote about critically in 2022). One hopes the experience will give national conservatives a new appreciation for the liberal values that will necessarily undergird their legal and rhetorical challenges to today's events.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
“Liberal values” now means putting people in prison for years without trial, so I understand why you pointed out that you didn’t approve of Natcon.
Gotta look out for #1.
Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo has since weighed in with a post calling today's shut-down attempt unacceptable. "Banning political meetings is unconstitutional," he wrote. "Full stop."
^^^This.
These kinds of shutdown provide a heckler's veto. And evidently the mayor of Brussels feels incapable of addressing their arguments directly.
Ooh. Now do Soros funded online censorship groups.
Stating that the conference "could undeniably lead to violent reactions." is pretty much setting up the ultimate heckler's veto.
Yup.
This afternoon, a group of right-of-center figures that includes several Reason contributors released an open letter "condemn[ing] in the strongest possible terms the Belgian authorities' attempts to shut down, without due process, the National Conservatism Conference underway in Brussels."
Oh my God. An actual letter!!! This will change things. Now back to ignoring state censorship.
“Yesterday (Monday) the replacement venue, the Sofitel Brussels…broke its written contract citing objections from people involved in the European Union Council who would be staying at the hotel. The Mayor of Etterbeek Vincent de Wolf (MR) yesterday boasted to The Brussels Times that he was responsible for the Sofitel cancellation.”
This is why section 230 should be expanded to cover venues.
To be fair the letter was sternly written.
Yeah, this is wrong. I loathe the national conservatives but they have every right to hold their conference. The government shouldn't be pre-emptively shutting down conferences, it is their duty instead to uphold association rights and speech rights, and only if there is actual violence or threats to liberty should they get involved.
I’m sure Democrats are taking notes on this one.
Why else do you think Stephanie is signal boosting it and feigning outrage.
Taking notes? They invented and perfected it. Places like Berkley, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, New York City and others make Conservatives jump through hoops to obtain a permit for their event. Then the Liberal politicians tell their minions to counter-protest the event. Then they pull the Conservative's permit supposedly to prevent violence while their Police lackeys protect the counter-protesters and arrest any Conservatives who resist. Sometime they arrest some of the counter-protesters, but, they are always released later.
Indeed. It’s all bullshit. Portland, when it was under Ted Wheeler, was a prime example of this.
The left needs to go.
Free speech in Belgium?
Of course not.
Brussels is the home of the European Union, home of the new, improved and sanitized fascism.
The 1930's all over again, but this time the fascists are disguising themselves in skin suits cut from the carcass of altruism.
“It’s not fascism if we don’t call it that,”
Kyles dad
I wonder how difficult it would be to bait one of those cops into saying that they're just following orders.
Altruism is alive and well here. Free expression is expected to self-immolate on the altar of ideology.
It's wrong no matter whose expression is suppressed and as experience on the Comments here shows, sunshine is the best disinfectant...Or at least it lights the way so rational people can have fun bashing and insulting bullshit worldviews and their proponents, of which there are many here.
>It's a good thing opponents of the move can appeal to the liberal values of free speech, free association, and equal treatment under law.
hahahahahahaha!
No, they're in *Europe*, Slade. Europe does not have a tradition of free speech, free association, and equal treatment under the law.
Remember when this was the sort of thing that F.I.R.E(ducation) used to defend against? Now, F.I.R.E(xpression) only takes on cases that get Associate Professors’ contracts renewed so they qualify for pensions, effectively advancing tenure for even trivial academics, drive student costs up, and generally make F.I.R.E(xpression) look like the cool, hip, millennial version of the ACLU.
Conquest's Second Law.
It's happening here as well --but the strangest place to watch it happening is at The National Review. TDS let them in and now they're taking over.
And for the same reason --too many 'conservatives' think they're better than 'right wing'.
Great article, fantastic tack. Spent no paragraphs defending free speech but most instead critiquing the censored group.
This is how you win hearts and minds boys!
Funny how none of this translates to the rights of conservatives in the US.
"This is not how leaders of a free society behave."
Now do the Trump witch-hunt.
Trump would love to have the power to shut down a conference that way. As indeed (as the article points out) would some of this conference's own participants. Any chance being on the receiving end will cause them to rethink that? Slim to none, I fear.
Cite?
Can you back that up?
I first interpreted the name of this gathering as simply meaning a national conference on conservatism. But no, it's a conference on "National Conservatism". I wonder if it is less ambiguous in Dutch.