Quiz: What Do You Know About the SAT?
Colleges have turned away from standardized testing in admissions. Are the tests really that bad?

In recent years, the tide turned against standardized tests such as the SAT and ACT. Once a nonnegotiable metric for determining college admission, many universities have cast off such tests, declaring them unnecessary—or even racist. While many schools went test-optional during the pandemic, that trend seems to have continued even on the other side of COVID-19 panic. According to FairTest, an anti–standardized testing group, most colleges in America are now test-optional, and over 80 refuse to look at scores entirely.
But the trend against testing may be reversing. New data show that standardized tests predict student achievement better than high school GPA alone. Some schools have even reinstated their testing requirement—including Dartmouth College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), whose dean of admissions told The New York Times, "Just getting straight A's is not enough information for us to know whether the students are going to succeed or not."
SATAT: SAT Aptitude Test
To test your knowledge on college entrance exams, here's a standardized test of our own:
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Quiz: The SAT, Reexamined."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Bad? No. The wokesters hate them because they're GOOD at predicting student success. That gets in the way of DEI.
Worse than that, standardized testing unavoidably reveals disparity in racial performance. Egalitarians despise this.
Just lazy egalitarians who prefer to cry racism at any difference rather than do the work of looking for root causes and solving those.
Can they predict Reason writer success?
Or commentariat failure?
Why is this story thought to be of interest to this audience? Has HyR run out of stories related to free minds and free markets?
Why do you think reason cares about free minds and free markets?
Skip the test, take a few classes at a community college, then transfer into the university of your choice. So much easier than stressing out over test scores and applications.
Way back in pre-history, the 'smartest' in my high school (as measured by SAT scores) had to struggle to keep a "B" average.
Smart, but bored by the program.
The combination of high test scores and low grades is a big red flag to selective admission officers. It shows a bright kid who isn't interested in school work. Not likely to do well in higher education.
Follow up question 1.
Which racial group does the worst on the sat
White
Asian
Black
Hispanic
Follow up question 2
Which racial group puts in the least effort in school work
White
Asian
Black
Hispanic
Just guessing, but--
#1--Black
#2--White
Detractors often point out that SAT scores are linked with family income.
Cue the argument for redistribution of wealth. And if not literal wealth, then "increased/biased opportunity" for one demographic over another. aka Affirmative Action/DEI.
"Just getting straight A's is not enough information for us to know whether the students are going to succeed or not."
Yea, just like how having a high pass/completion rate and quick sprint times aren't enough information to know whether a quarterback will succeed or not. We gotta look at whether he comes from a poor home. And, if he does, we should weigh that more heavily in absence of actual success metrics. That's how to win games.
I would actually argue it’s not poverty in and of itself that is the detriment of education, but home instability. While the two frequently travel hand in hand, it is possible to be impoverished and in a stable home. They aren’t *necessarily* linked.
I suspect that SAT tests are very good at predicting future college graduation, subsequent grad/professional degrees and income in fields of medicine, law and STEM.
Encouraging high school students who scores 400 out of 800 in math and science on the SAT shouldn't be encouraged to enroll in college in one of those fields (and borrow tens/hundreds of thousands of dollars to do) is irresponsible.
have they changed the SAT to reflect what is taught in college today or is it the same test I took in the 80s?
Next question:
Reason is to libertarianism as Lia Thomas is to ___________.
middle linebacker!
Wendy's!
Islam
This article must have been written like two years ago - colleges are already moving *back* to standardized testing.
It's standard practice for Reason "news" to be 2-3 years behind the times.
Neat, but sources on these findings would have been helpful.
Standardized testing primarily averages out the quality of minds of today's students. Let's not focus on race. it looks both stupid and cynical. The problem is that universal standardization reduces the overall cognitive functions of the brain. This discourages you from thinking outside the box. Here, read the article about people with the highest iq. There are no people on this list who have always been in the middle stream. There are those people who had a goal, an inquisitive brain and the will to go towards the goal. The best thing modern parents can do is to allow their children to develop their brains, their memory, their logical chains before the system makes them one of the bricks in the wall.