Arizona's Battle Against School Choice for Special Needs
State government officials deploy scare tactics against families of special needs students seeking alternatives.

School choice opponents warn that students with disabilities lose their federal protections when they enroll in private schools. "It's important for Arizona families to be aware of the rights they give up when they leave the public school system," said the state's Attorney General Kris Mayes. But the latest special education scandal casts further doubt on whether these rights help some parents at all. The details reported by The Arizona Republic are chilling and the district's response is infuriating.
"This child has been through hell," said Sandy Zelenka, recounting how her autistic second grader, Levi, was treated by Peoria Unified School District's autism program before transferring to a private school in 2020. Levi was restrained for long periods in an unfurnished closet-sized room until Zelenka was alerted by an assistant.
Six other families have come forward to The Arizona Republic with more recent allegations, including unexplained physical markings such as a black eye, bruising, and a bloody cut. They demanded answers but were stonewalled by district officials, who deny any abuse or mishandling by employees.
But school employees said "children are not safe in the program, and problems have been long-standing," The Arizona Republic reported. They also accuse the district of concealing records from parents.
Two of the families have already switched their kids to private schools and can use Arizona's Empowerment Scholarship Accounts (ESA) to help pay for tuition and other services. Under the program, students with disabilities get extra funding based on their needs.
While school choice opponents boast of robust federal protections, the reality for students in Peoria Unified—and public schools across the country—is much different.
The federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees a free and appropriate public education for students with disabilities. When it was first signed into law in 1975 (then known as the Education for All Handicapped Children Act), public schools routinely discriminated against disabled students.
IDEA requires schools to develop an Individualized Education Program (IEP) in consultation with parents that describes a student's needs, sets goals, and establishes what services the school will provide. However, school officials have the final say over what's included in an IEP, and their incentive—to comply with federal mandates at the lowest possible cost—is at odds with parents' desire to get the best education possible.
Parents also have little recourse if they don't agree with an IEP's provisions or how it's carried out by the school. They can either use IDEA's due process procedures to get an administrative hearing—which can be time-consuming and costly—or enroll their child in a private school and sue the school district for reimbursement, which has financial risks and upfront costs that many can't afford.
Suffice it to say the entire special education apparatus is rigged against students. IDEA only provides accountability if parents have the time, financial means, and doggedness to navigate a highly bureaucratic system that's tilted against them. But even then, nothing is guaranteed—California's Irvine Unified School District spent over $1 million in legal fees fighting a single family just to make a point to other parents.
In 2021–2022, parents made 10,806 mediation requests and filed 35,650 complaints against public schools nationwide, indicating that many families aren't satisfied with their special education services. Private school choice programs in states such as Arizona, Florida, and Indiana allow parents to opt out of this byzantine system altogether, and it's working: There are now at least 137,000 students with disabilities in the U.S.—including over 10,000 in Arizona's ESA program—using school choice to access options that better fit their needs.
There are many bad arguments against school choice, but fear-mongering about students losing their federal protections is the most ridiculous. Special education is terribly broken, and school choice is the only thing that actually tips the scale in the favor of parents.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Cntrl-f 'democrats'
0 results.
The entirely of the anti choice and anti ESA movement in Arizona is from the teachers union and democrats. It is Hobbs who campaigned on ending it. With other democrat politicians.
This article only refers to school choice opponents. Why?
Goebbels left an instruction book, you know.
My Nephew had Spina Bifida. When he was in school, he was in a special program for students with disabilities. I can't say anything about the abuse, because there wasn't any. What I can say is that there was a Teacher for every four students and each student had an "assistant". When my Nephew was hospitalized, his parents kept receiving threatening phone calls and letters that were supposedly from the School District, but, were actually from the Teacher's Union. They lost money for his teacher and his assistant every day that he wasn't in school. His not being there wasn't because he wanted to stay home or his parents were keeping him home, he was either hospitalized or there were legitimate medical reasons for keeping him home.
A couple who belong to the same social club that I do got some of these calls and letters when their daughter was in the hospital last year. Their daughter was born with a deformed pelvis and had to use braces and crutches to walk. Doctors were able to correct it so that she now walks and runs normally. This allowed her to go to class normally this year. Again it was about the funding that was lost because she was in the hospital and that she wouldn't need her "assistant" any more.
This particular incentive caused me troubles in school that I understood as an adult looking back.
In California when I was a child, schools were paid per student per day. This created perverse incentives to keep a kid in the classroom, even at the cost of educating the child. I would have done significantly better just testing out of some classes, or taking a course at the community college that was not offered at high school instead of a time-waster that was "required".
My niece, who has a similar mind (though she's much smarter than me) struggled until she got into a charter school that didn't have that funding model. She finished high school in 3 years and went on to earn a bachelor's degree by 21.
Sounds like you've got the same bullshit funding model, but somehow worse. I argued endlessly with administration, but never had the union attacking me.
Katie Hobbs Is A Monster.
^This is why you can’t put chicks in charge
repeal the Wilson Administration.
Like 'my body, my choice', there is only one choice allowed.
"It's important for Arizona families to be aware of the rights they give up when they leave the public school system," said the state's Attorney General Kris Mayes.
So, if you have to belong to a government institution to get something, is it a "right?"
This chick uses that word, "rights." I do not think it means what she thinks it means.
You don't even get any privileges. In fact, you give up rights and get no privileges.
>State government officials deploy scare tactics against families of special needs students seeking alternatives.
Abortion
Abortion
ABORTION
abortionabortionabortionabortion!
Remember - that was the most important thing. Arizona needs abortion protection so we should all vote for Abortion-Mouse. And they did (maybe).
So fuck 'em, we're getting what we voted for, good and hard, because you fethers were focused on abortion.
I'll also note that the author never names the *Democrats* in Arizona that are opposed to school choice.
Because its 90% Democrat opposition.
> "It's important for Arizona families to be aware of the rights they give up when they leave the public school system,"
The AZ public school system is more responsive to parents than a lot of other states (note, I'm not saying its *better* - or even particularly good) - but you still don't have any rights as a parent with a kid in a public school.
You are literally giving up no rights - and taking back a lot of power (and shouldering a lot of responsibility) - by leaving the PS system.
I've noticed authoritarian and totalitarian regimes do not allow school choice.
I wonder if those against school choice embrace the same principles of Stalin, Hitler, Mao and Castro?