Meet 'Literally Anybody Else,' the Presidential Candidate That 2024 Demands
The 35-year-old Texan formerly known as Dustin Ebey voted for Gary Johnson in 2016 and says the national debt is America's biggest problem.

Like most Americans, Dustin Ebey is unhappy with the prospect of an electoral rematch between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump.
Unlike most of us, however, he's decided to do something about it.
The 35-year-old Texan became a viral sensation this week after legally changing his name to Literally Anybody Else and declaring his candidacy for the White House. The goal, he told Reason on Thursday, is "giving a unified voice to the idea that we deserve better."
"[Biden and Trump] have their platforms, they have their stances. And if you don't fit into them, you have you have to decide," Else says. "Some people they're perfectly aligned with—but it's definitely not the majority."
Indeed, a Gallup poll released this week found that about one-third of Americans believe that neither Trump nor Biden would be a good president if elected to another term. Other polls show that both men have low approval ratings and that a majority of voters wish both men would decline to run again. At 77 and 81, respectively, Trump and Biden are the oldest pair of major party presidential nominees in history—breaking the record they set four years ago.
Could it be that Americans are looking for Literally Anybody Else?
In the interview, Else described himself as a generally apolitical centrist who has grown increasingly distressed at the state of the country's major parties. He says he voted for Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson in 2016 after being unable to stomach the choice between Trump and Hillary Clinton, then pulled the lever for Trump in 2020—a decision he came to regret after the January 6 riot. A seventh-grade math teacher and Army vet, Else says the national debt is the biggest issue facing the country.
"If we cannot get our debt under control, there is almost nothing that will save us," he says.
Else filed the necessary paperwork with the Federal Elections Commission—which at first did not believe he was serious about this—and is beginning the arduous task of collecting the thousands of signatures that he'll need to get on the Texas ballot as an independent candidate.
Else has been shocked by the outpouring of support he's received via social media and claims that he's received dozens of calls and emails from prospective volunteers and people interested in working on his campaign. A more professionalized campaign website is currently under construction, he says, and specific policy proposals will be rolling out in the coming months.
His effort is the ultimate of longshots—it would take "an act of God" to put him in the White House, he admits.
Still, there is no denying that his decision to commit to this bit reflects a brutal truth about the state of the 2024 election. And there's no doubt that Else's candidacy offers something neither Trump nor Biden can: He is Literally not them.
Reason caught up with Literally Anybody Else on Thursday night to ask about the origins of this wild idea, his political ideology, and how he feels about already being labeled a spoiler for the two major parties.
Reason: I have to ask the obvious question first. Why are you doing this?
Literally Anybody Else: Have you seen who's running for president lately?
Reason: I have. Fair point.
Literally Anybody Else: There's a huge, huge shortcoming when you think about [it].
When I look at Donald Trump, even barring all of his policy gaffes, Trump represents the 0.1 percent of wealth just by virtue of him being a billionaire. That's not something that a lot of us can connect with. For Biden, he's been a politician for 60 years, and I just doubt his ability to even sympathize with what's going on down here at the ground level. I want something better. I want something closer to me, closer to the people around me.
Reason: How did this idea first come about, and was there intoxication involved?
Literally Anybody Else: I actually don't react well to alcohol. I don't really drink it all that much. I had a glass of wine today and I am struggling to get through half of it.
If there was Literally Anybody Else on the 2020 ballot, I would have picked it. With that sentiment in mind, I thought, "Hey, I bet that I could make money with this concept." So I bought the domain LiterallyAnybodyElse.com with the intent of using the gimmick to sell t-shirts. It was a commercial decision. As we started going through the year, getting closer and closer to election season, I kept hearing more and more of the rhetoric, more and more of the divisiveness on the news. I began to wonder if it'd be possible to just get Literally Anybody Else on the ballot.
But I quickly came to realize that many states did not allow aliases on the ballot. So, I came to the conclusion that in order to actually have this happen, somebody would have to legally change their name to Literally Anybody Else, which is just stupid. Who would go that length when it is really that serious of a thing? As time went on, it got that serious.
Reason: Any unexpected complications?
Literally Anybody Else: I filed the paperwork online, paid my 330-something dollars, and within a couple of days I went in front of the judge and told her what I wanted to change my name to. She looked at me. She was like, "You going to be that guy?" I didn't even know if it would go through. And she allowed it. She said, "Yeah, it's part of your First Amendment right to protest."
And I was like, OK, this is happening.
Reason: Are your friends and family calling you "Literally" now?
Literally Anybody Else: No, the name has a pragmatic function. Look at it like this: You and I are talking. We would not be talking if I was running as Dustin.
Reason: That's a good point. What's the Literally Anybody Else campaign pitch to the American people?
Literally Anybody Else: The first phase right now is all about unity. I am the candidate who stands to unify America in ways that the other two candidates just simply can't anymore.
They spend so much time demonizing the other side that any perception of empathy is perceived as betrayal. If I'm going to be president of the United States, I need to represent the people of the United States, not just those who are aligned with me, not just those who fit into the cookie cutter that I am. They have their platforms, they have their stances. If you don't fit into them, you have you have to decide. Some people they're perfectly aligned with—but it's definitely not the majority.
Reason: How would you describe your political ideology?
Literally Anybody Else: I cannot at this time. That will be coming out in June or July. I don't want to focus on the platform without having the proper development. I'm political outsider.
Reason: Who did you vote for in the most recent elections?
Literally Anybody Else: When it was Trump versus Hillary, I couldn't really take either one of them seriously. I ended up voting third party, for Gary Johnson. He was a weird candidate, but again, that was more of an "I don't like Trump or Hillary" vote.
In 2020, I was very, very busy and didn't have the luxury of looking into the candidates. My family aligned with Trump, so I did end up voting for him—and ended up regretting it shortly after when January 6 happened.
I still to this day do not understand how we got to the point where we are. It makes no sense. Like, nobody wanted this in 2020. How did you how did we end up with this again in 2024? Can someone please explain to me how the system has allowed that to happen?
Reason: What's the most important issue facing the country right now?
Literally Anybody Else: The most important issue facing the country is the debt, bar none. Many things spin off from that. If we cannot get our debt under control, there is almost nothing that will save us.
I would not allow any spending that did not have a balanced budget. We had $7 trillion added to the national debt under Trump, $2 trillion under Joe Biden. My three-year-old daughter in some way, shape, or form will have to contribute to paying that back. If we don't manage it now, what happens in 20, 30 years if we reach a point where our interest on the national debt goes beyond what we can pay? What happens to America's credibility? What happens to our ability to take care of ourselves if people can't trust our word?
Reason: What does success look like?
Literally Anybody Else: Giving a unified voice to the idea that we deserve better, and actually having it make an effect on how we do politics. You know, I think if we can move the needle from the polarized ends back to the center, back to sanity, kind of narrow the Overton window so that those who are most extreme have the least voice, and then those who are most aligned with the majority of the country can have an avenue to represent us. That's all I want.
Literally Anybody Else stands for an idea. We just want representation. Somebody needs to step up to provide it. Since nobody stepping up, that's why I've decided to put myself out there.
Reason: Last thing. Third-party and independent candidates frequently get singled out for supposedly being "spoilers" to the two major parties. Are you worried about spoiling the election for either Biden or Trump?
Literally Anybody Else: Not really.
But it's been interesting to watch social media because I've been called a Trump plant. I've been called a Biden plant. I've been called a liberal hack. I've been called a conservative. But I'm intentionally staying in the middle, and it's not really that hard because I am a centrist. I average out to the middle. You'll start seeing more of that in June, July when I start publishing policies.
It's been honestly entertaining to see where people are trying to put me in these boxes because they're all over the place. But right now it's all about unity. It's all about bringing people together. Building the chorus, shall we say, before we start singing the message.
This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If he wants to be taken seriously he'll need a boot for a hat.
Meet 'Literally Anybody Else,' the Presidential Candidate That TDS-Addled Shits Demand.
Fixed.
The editors at least seem a bit embarrassed with their 2020 Biden voting article.
If he's still breathing he's not embarrassed enough.
Seems like a normal guy.
Yeah, he does have that going against him.
The most important issue is always government coercion.
Promises to smite the other tribe win more votes than promises to leave everyone alone.
Trump didn't prosecute Hillary but Hillary and Biden have created literally a witch-hunt against Trump.
You've mastered the art of self-projection. Good job /s
That is a popular platform. Yesterday the non-US news was that the anarco-fascista who beat the other looters in Argentina by impersonating a libertarian was cozying up to Laura Richardson. She's the Kleptocracy's blend of dope Czar Bill Bennett and Marjorie Taylor Greene Teeth--only with full military capability to overthrow any government in South America.
Eh. Sure, why not.
“It’s been honestly entertaining to see where people are trying to put me in these boxes because they’re all over the place.”
Tends to happen when the definition of the USA (US Constitution) gets ignored.
And here is yet another political candidate who through an entire interview can’t stop talking about how the [WE] mob RULES if only the [WE] mob can gun-it-up together with absolutely no mention to which he’d SWEAR an OATH to honor ‘the peoples’ law over his elected position.
He may make a decent politician but people aren’t going to have a USA much longer if they keep thinking that [WE] mob ‘democracy’ is what RULES obsolete.
I also find it quite pathetic his only reason for Literally-Anybody-Else than Trump is election skepticism and Trumps success.
It's a crying shame you didn't read the interview.
"...then pulled the lever for Trump in 2020—a decision he came to regret after the January 6th riot..."
So the sumbitch can't spell "protest"?
a decision he came to regret
What a dipshit. Would he have regretted it if Trump had won such a narrow victory and ten of thousands more protesters had done exactly the same thing? If Trump had won there would have protests nationwide.
So the sumbitch can’t spell “protest”?
"Trump represents the 0.1 percent of wealth just by virtue of him being a billionaire"
Whether they guy said "the wealthy" instead of "wealth" and it's a typo by Boehm or he actually said "wealth" or said and meant "wealth" I can't tell but, by pretty much any permutation, he either has literally no concept of the size of the debt and the economy, he doesn't understand how representative democracy actually works, or both.
Mr. Else claims that he represents the political middle and then spouts extremist rhetoric demanding a balanced federal budget. There is no constituency for this radical idea beyond the several dozen individuals who read the tendentious screeds emanating from Reason Institute and their fellow travelers. Mr. Else would do well to reflect on the issues that actually have widespread support as evidenced by the successes of his predecessors. For example, The Rent Is Too Damn High. It's almost impossible to find anyone willing to disagree with this. It is in fact self evident. Also as research consistently proves, many Americans do not have a pony. Undoubtedly the well paid scribes at Reason have barns full of ponies but our hard working middle class families often don't have even one. It's about time a candidate rectified this grave injustice via executive order if congress fails to act.
The rent is too damned high due to inflation of maintenance, labor and building costs. Hell, even people who own homes can’t afford to maintain them.
Purchasing power matters.
I am so very sorry that you are a financial incompetent. I've never been better. My oil stocks have tripled in 4 years. My 401K is going gangbusters. My IRA and CDs are finally earning decent interest. I sold my house for 2-1/2 times what I paid for it. My wife sold her car for more than she paid for it. I got my annuity last year for a fraction of what I'd have paid 4 years ago. America is definitely on the right track, except for those like you who can't manage money.
Anyone who brags about buying an annuity is a mental midget.
?Free? ponies everywhere. It's amazing you can brag about all that UN-EARNED money without lifting a finger to get it. The more amazing part is you seem to think that's the "right track".
So tell us all dipsh*t; Where do you think all your lazy *ss entitlement came from? Care to tell us all what you did to deserve it? You leftards talk 'inequality' BS all the time yet are the biggest policy pushers for it. Straight up 'armed-theft'. Market gaming 'armed-theft'. Anything and everything you can dream up to STEAL what you didn't EARN.
And when more-than-not are wasting ?free? ponies than making them WTF do you suppose is going to happen? Think it's going to rain ponies on a cloudy day or what?
Smoke and Mirrors, Smoke and Mirrors and Criminal Acts.
The Rent Is Too Damn High.
Education is too Damn High.
Healthcare is too Damn High.
Pharmaceuticals are too Damn High.
Can anyone guess what all these items have in common???
That's right; The Gov-Gun communist nightmare of making them ?affordable?.
Bullshit.
I'm not disagreeing with anything you've said, but he's not wrong.
He's got my vote.
Today in western civilization Marxism. Immigration into welfare western nations is being used to collapse economic growth and currency. Didn’t Marx predict that commies would use capitalist ideologies/tools (open borders) to collapse economies? Germany negative growth in 2023.
https://jacobin.com/2024/04/sahra-wagenknecht-bsw-migrants-pensions-populism
Yeap. Marxists have utilized open border propaganda to capture many libertarian outlets. CATO has a glut of them (including one who had an article here). It is the ethos we see here from both writers and commenter who oush unbounded immigration while denying the costs and welfare. It is very pervasive as the advocacy for no borders into a welfare state harms the taxpayers and citizens who have been paying those costs their entire lives. Hoppe was very thorough on this point.
OMG!! You are SO right!! Arizona is being CRUSHED under the weight of UNBOUNDED immigration. AZ's real (inflation adjusted) GDP has ONLY grown from $422 billion in 2020 to $511 billion in 2023. Unemployment in January 2024 was a WHOPPING 3.7%!! My God, how do Arizonans SURVIVE such a NIGHTMARE!!
Source of statistics: https://usafacts.org/topics/economy/state/arizona/
And in other news.
"More than half of immigrants on welfare"
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/09/01/immigrant-welfare-use-report/71517072/
He's too damned ignorant.
I don't know the Trump figure offhand; $7T seems a bit high, but not massively so. But Biden? Criminy, he's been $2T over in a single year!
Sorry, Jack, come back when you believe the DNC a little less blindly, and I might believe you're a centrist.
Spending trillions dollars to offset the effects of the worst global pandemic in a century that shut down the global economy is entirely justifiable. The 2020 spending was necessary (yes, even with all the fraud and waste). But that's exactly why we need to balance our budget on normal years. It's criminal to run huge deficits in years when the economy is doing well. We need to do that so that when an actual disaster hits we have the money to respond.
You are deluded. The pandemic did not shut down the global economy, governments did, contrary to a hundred years of experience that was all thrown out the window because a bunch of desperate politicians finally found something, anything, they could do to look important.
Fuck off, slaver.
Even if the US stayed completely open and had no shutdowns, the rest of the world still shut down, there would have been major domestic disruptions due to the number of sick people, and the economic costs would have been beyond anything seen in a century. I do think we should have never shut down anything beyond April of 2020 when we knew what we were dealing with, but FFS you are crazy and delusional if you think we could have avoided major economic disaster.
there would have been major domestic disruptions due to the number of sick people
Bullshit.
Vernon has it right. Very very few people of working age got seriously ill or died from Covid.
It was known from the start. The average age at death "from Covid" in Italy was 80 or so; the average age at death without Covid, by a remarkable coincidence. That passenger ship had, what, 800 crew and double that in passengers, and only had 3 deaths even while locked down in port.
Some people say it's worth it if it saves one live. I'm not one of those people. I don't think the economic cost of the lockdowns, and the future costs of government debt, were worth the lives saved.
https://www.maximumtruth.org/p/the-covid-fudge-factor
There's a real deep dive with relatively minimal bias and lots of numbers, if you're into that sort of thing.
Funny how fudging traces the old USSR line there, while MAGA traces the old George Wallace line Stateside. Less funny is how COVID elicited the same reactions as Spanish Flu. The major difference is that COVID and Hunter Biden copping a buzz are the only two talking points Republicans have. Back in 1918-19 The Flu and Making Beer a National Felony were THE Republican talking points.
“….COVID and hunter Biden copping a buzz are the only two talking points republicans have.”
See hank, this is what living in the 1920s and 70s is doing to your perception. How could you not be aware of debt, crime, immigration, climate hysteria, divisive identity politics, censorship, pushing tranny lunacy on little kids, etc, etc…?
Lol. Take a nap, old man. Republicans may be next to useless but the Democrats give them plenty of “talking points” outside of covid and biden corruption.
No.
First mistake, forgetting that ALL the global shutdowns were caused by governments, not the pandemic.
Second mistake, assuming the US economy had to jump off the cliff after the rest of the idiots.
Third mistake, assuming a sane US response would have been ignored by the rest of the world and still ended up with a global economic shutdown.
Fourth mistake, assuming a sane US would have panicked when the rest of the world panicked.
Fifth mistake, doubling down on your delusion. You are, in fact, deluded, and that is in your hands alone.
Fuck off, slaver.
"Spending trillions dollars to offset the effects of the worst global pandemic in a century that shut down the global economy is entirely justifiable..."
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Again, "Trump represents the 0.1 percent of wealth just by virtue of him being a billionaire."
I don't know if he doesn't actually understand math or representative democracy that, economically, Congress for the last 60 yrs. has had more to do with our current fiscal situation than one oppositional Presidency for 4 yrs. several years ago or what, but there were plenty of abject morons in the OWS movement who could, correctly, squawk "The debt is too big!" when offered a cracker or a microphone.
Those estimates utilize authorization and are at least a year old from Bidens spending who is estimated to pass Trump by end of this year.
Example, states are still spending Covid funds at the behest of Jorge, but the spending was authorized under Trump. Despite Joe extending the use allowance the dishonest try to tie that spending to Trump.
Maybe he just hasn’t updated his numbers in a while? People can be wrong you know.
No. Everyone must be held exactly to the thing exactly as they said it once off the cuff; unless they habitually spout cockamamie nonsense all the time, then it's just their style.
Centrists are the worst.
Prove him wrong with actual facts instead of your kneejerk opinion. BTW, Trump's spending spree added $8.5 trillion to the national debt, not 7.
US national debt per year
2017 $20.5T ...
2019 $22.7T ...
2020 $26.9T ... = $6.4T Trump
2024 $34T ... = $7.1T Biden
Now give credit where credit is due in that Democrats wrote 87% of the Cares Act and voided the voting process to push it through would show a [D] to [R] difference of.
$22.7 - $20.5T = Debt added by [R] = $2.2T
$34.0 - $22.7T = Debt added by [D] = $11.3T
Trump represents the 0.1 percent of wealth just by virtue of him being a billionaire.
I bet there were a lot of people with funny names who were able to correctly diagnose the size of the national debt as "too big" in the Occupy Wall Street movement too.
Well, he has a low bar running against Trump or Biden.
I am getting the tee shirt, though.
Shocked that ENB is apparently refusing to report on this,
Bizarre Reuters Article Warns Climate Change Is Hurting “Indonesian Trans Sex Workers”
https://modernity.news/2024/04/05/bizarre-reuters-article-warns-climate-change-is-hurting-indonesian-trans-sex-workers/
The author, Leo Galuh, complains that “Nearly 93% of respondents saw decreased income during the rainy season,” explaining “Trans women…are among the most affected by extreme weather linked to climate change, as well as suffering disproportionately when disasters strike.”
Shocked that ENB is apparently refusing to report on this,
That’s perfect! If she doesn’t, then you’re right! If she does, it’s only because you said something! Either way you’re good and she’s bad! Heads you win, tails she loses!
OMG!! There is only 1 news topic per day per Federal Law, and ENB somehow MISSED the very most critically important article about you and your fellow trans prostitutes. HOW DARE HE!!!!!
“Indonesian trans sex workers” hardest hit?
“Nearly 93% of respondents…” Lol. I wonder if “Indonesian trans sex workers” might just have really shitty lives, and blaming it on climate change is as good as anything else. Especially if it elicits fake sympathy from morons like Leo Galuh. And Edg.
I was with him until he said he couldn't hold his liquor.
The federal taxpayer funded bureaucracy union activists, curbed by Trump, are back in full force via executive order Biden administration. Damn, this from The Hill, where most staffers hate western civilization and the U.S. (except Robbie).
https://thehill.com/opinion/4577050-how-much-time-do-federal-bureaucrats-spend-working-for-unions/
I'm still voting for Johnny Fuckerfaster until someone can convince me I'm wrong.
I'm sticking with Jane Fuckmeslower.
Quick, one of the LP candidates should change name to "Noneof The Above." With ballot status already in a great number of states, and easy access to a few more, the LP could set a new record with that candidate in 2024!
Hell, they might even win.
The looters'd put it at the top of the ballot. See Rudebarbs
Giant Meteor!
Just end it already.
That's about what it would take to deal with the mess in DC.
It's refreshing to see a candidate seriously mention debt. It was, however, disappointing to hear him say, "Trump lost me from Jan 6", when he should have said, "Trump lost me when he signed that massive spending bill in his lame duck session". On the plus side, if he shortens his new legal first name to "Lit", he might capture a good chunk of the pot head voters.
We now see who wrote the MAGAt "Minority Report" for Texas "LP" plank reform: "LPTexas advocates for the complete restoration of rights lost by VIOLENT offenders upon the completion of their sentence!" National Socialist Libertarianism wants SS, SA and KKKaucasians to stop at the gun mart on the way out of prison; to hell with repealing victimless crime laws.
In honor of Literally Anybody Else, I changed my Reason username.
Prove it.
Hey Reason,
Instead of profiling random wingnuts who are running as "independents" and "centrists", how about doing articles about Libertarians running for the Libertarian Party nomination!?! You used to actually BE a libertarian publication, ya know...!
I remember those days! That was back when Ayn Rand told the girl-bulliers to go to Hell and got vaporized for Jesus. Nambla Boy's ravings in the defunct TIA then caused a mass Exodus from objectivist circles into Reason magazine subscriber lists. Today we're stuck with Austrian Nazi infiltraitors praying for Jesus to resurrect Ronald Reagan as a new Lazarus.
The only other fake libertarian worried about the Overton window--rather than individual rights or repealing bad laws--demanded that shooting up women's clinics with military weapons and killing cops and civilians in the process be legalized and praised as baby-saving. Nick masterfully interviewed the jerk, and handed him enough rope to hang his whole Anschluss.
His effort is the ultimate of longshots—it would take "an act of God" to put him in the White House, he admits.
How many people here are willing to recognize that God exists and could do such a thing, in support of such a candidate as this?
God has a long and consistent history of staying out of our politics.
Sadly, less than 5% of voters really care about the national debt, as evidenced by Ron Paul and Rand Paul losing in the Republican primaries, and Gary Johnson losing in the general election. Each of them had a reasonable plan to balance the budget within 8 years.
Not saying they would have actually managed to do it, but I’m certain that spending would not have doubled from 3 trillion a year (in 2008) to 6 trillion a year now, if any of them had managed to win, or even show that there is a sizable voting bloc for fiscal austerity.
If “None of the Above” was on the ballot, it would win in a landslide.