With Rising Debt, the U.S. Federal Government Is in Bad Company
Governments around the world have been on a borrowing spree, and prosperity has suffered.

Misery loves company, as they say. But does financial irresponsibility also enjoy spending a little quality time with friends? If so, it's quite a party. While the U.S. government is famously running up debt to stratospheric levels, governments around the world have been spending beyond their means and borrowing to make ends meet. The likely result: financial markets put at risk by over-extended governments and slow economic growth for pretty much everybody.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Soaring Government Debt Everywhere
"Public debt as a fraction of gross domestic product has increased significantly in recent decades, across advanced as well as emerging and middle-income economies," write Tobias Adrian, Vitor Gaspar, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas for the International Monetary Fund (IMF). "It is expected to reach 120 percent and 80 percent of output respectively by 2028."
Public debt—money borrowed by governments—has steadily risen, they add, because years of very low interest rates "reduced the pressure for fiscal consolidation and allowed public deficits and public debt to drift upwards." Then, COVID-19 disrupted the global economy and governments responded by funding "large emergency support packages" on credit.
Now, with interest rates rising, the cost of servicing debt is going up, too. But governments continue to borrow as if nothing has changed. Of course, riskier governments have to pay higher interest rates.
"On average, African countries pay four times more for borrowing than the United States and eight times more than the wealthiest European economies," United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres cautioned last summer with the release of A World of Debt: A Growing Burden to Global Prosperity. "A total of 52 countries – almost 40 percent of the developing world – are in serious debt trouble."
As of 2022, that report revealed, global public debt stood at $92 trillion and rising. Interest payments displaced other expenditures in a growing number of nations, especially developing countries. High public debt crowds out financial room for everything else, including the ability of private parties to borrow for starting or expanding businesses that create jobs and build wealth.
Public Debt Crowds Out Private Investment
"Households who buy government debt reduce their savings in productive private investments," Kent Smetters and Marcos Dinerstein wrote in 2021 for the Penn Wharton Budget Model. "As the spending is unproductive, the economy is poorer and total savings is lower due to capital crowd out."
"Government spending redirects real resources in the economy and can crowd out private capital formation," they add. "An additional $1 trillion debt this year could decrease GDP by as much as 0.28 percent in 2050."
If you take that insight and apply it to a world of governments on a collective borrowing spree, you end up with a hobbled global economy where prosperity becomes increasingly elusive.
"Medium-term growth rates are projected to continue declining on the back of mediocre productivity growth, weaker demographics, feeble investment and continued scarring from the pandemic," note IMF's Adrian, Gaspar, and Gourinchas. "Projections for growth five years ahead have fallen to the lowest level in decades."
Heavy government borrowing also creates risk for the financial sector by putting banks at the mercy of massive debtors of uncertain creditworthiness. "The more banks hold of their countries' sovereign debt, the more exposed their balance sheet is to the sovereign's fiscal fragility," note the IMF analysts.
Heavily indebted governments also reduce their ability to act as backstops in case of financial crisis as they become the likeliest causes of crises of the future. As they continue to borrow, they reduce the likelihood that productive private economic activity will grow them out of their financial problems.
"Higher government debt implies more state interference in the economy and higher taxes in the future," The Economist points out in its interactive overview of global government debt. Also, add the editors, rising debt "creates a recurring popularity test for individual governments" which often goes poorly in terms of fiscal responsibility because paying outstanding bills isn't popular with voters.
Higher Debt Leads to Lost Prosperity
Well, isn't that cheerful? It's also extraordinarily unfortunate. After thousands of years of grindingly slow progress, recent decades saw the human race escaping poverty. According to the World Bank, even as populations increased, the number of people living below the poverty line, adjusted for inflation, plummeted from 2.01 billion in 1990 to 689 million in 2019.
In 2016, the economist Deirdre N. McCloskey attributed improving prospects for so many of the world's people to "liberalism, in the free-market European sense."
But that progress reversed in recent years, with poverty blipping back up (712 million people in 2022) amidst slower economic growth and after drastic government interventions during the pandemic. A future of stumbling economies hobbled by debt-ridden governments that crowd out private investment is one in which more people are poorer than they would have been if the world had stuck with free markets and implemented a modicum of financial responsibility.
As concerned as the U.N. is about rising public debt, its proposed "solutions" are pretty much what you would expect from that organization. A lot of verbiage about a "more inclusive" system providing "increased liquidity" and "affordable long-term financing" boils down to letting the riskiest governments have a greater say in offering themselves cheap financing. What could possibly go wrong?
The IMF analysts, on the other hand, propose "durable fiscal consolidation" while "financial conditions remain relatively accommodative and labor markets robust." I take that as a gentle suggestion that governments need to start paying down their debt to sustainable levels before interest rates and economic conditions deprive them of any options in the matter.
Gentle suggestion or not, governments need to get their fiscal affairs in order before they take us all down with them. Heavily indebted governments result in burdened economies that lead to a poorer world for everybody. With its irresponsible borrow-and-spend ways, the U.S. government is, unfortunately, not alone. Most if not all world governments are hanging out in very bad company.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
All of the discussions seem to presume that somehow all that debt will be repaid. I’d like to see some serious discussion of the most likely scenario: mass repudiation.
The DEBT is not the DEFICIT. And the DEFICIT is not the DEBT. They are separate problems.
Government BORROWING drives up the debt, not government SPENDING.
The solution to our debt problem is simple: STOP ISSUING DEBT-BASED MONEY! Begin issuing pure “unbacked” fiat money to fund the deficit, rather than going further into debt. The inflationary impact of unbacked dollars is no worse than the inflationary impact of the same amount of debt-backed dollars. Issuing unbacked dollars will halt the increase in the national debt and its crushing $1,000,000,000,000 in annual interest. Paying off part of the maturing debt each year and rolling over the rest will eventually bring the national debt (and its taxpayer-financed interest payments) down to zero. See http://www.fixourmoney.com .
“Begin issuing pure “unbacked” fiat money to fund the deficit, rather than going further into debt.”
Weimar Germany proves that that was a bad idea. More recently, Zimbabwe did the same thing.
See http://www.fixourmoney.com . The article addresses both those issues:
“The German (1921-23) and Hungarian (1945-46) hyperinflations were the products of special circumstances and were not triggered by a political desire to spend recklessly. Each country was on the losing side of a world war and found itself weighed down by a huge and unpayable war debt imposed by the victors (the Soviet Union, in the case of Hungary). Reparations had to be delivered in the form of gold, goods and hard currency. In an attempt to pay off these debts, each country printed massive amounts of its official currency to purchase the assets required to pay these reparations. Neither country had any alternative. This practice directly triggered both ruinous hyperinflations.
“The more recent bout of unrestrained money printing in Zimbabwe, which led to hyperinflation, was facilitated by massive government corruption, draconian political and economic controls, and widespread expropriation and destruction of farms and other productive enterprises. These preconditions for hyperinflation do not exist in any advanced market-based economy. If such circumstances do arise someday in the U.S., backing our fiat money with government bonds will not save the country from a financial meltdown; it will likely make matters worse.
“It’s worth noting that the U.S. today has one thing in common with postwar Germany and Hungary: the presence of a government debt that we are increasingly unable to pay back. We can continue “kicking the can down the road” as our national debt continues to become more unmanageable, or we can begin to gradually pay it down. Given our present political and economic circumstances, the only way we can accomplish this is by breaking the link between the federal deficit and the national debt.”
To the extent that that the Fed buys govt debt “issuing pure ‘unbacked’ fiat money to fund the deficit” is effectively what is happening if people don’t really expect the Fed to sell that debt any time soon.
But there’s no such thing as a free lunch: spending now takes resources, some share of which would otherwise be invested, and, certeris paribus, that lower investment lowers growth.
There was one point in history where the federal debt was paid off. Catastrophe ensued. We immediately had the worst depression we had ever had.
The problem with the increasing debt is the interest costs. It is a drain on current citizens from the prior generation benefitting.
“prosperity becomes increasingly elusive.”
So far that is not the case. The stock market is near all time highs.
How can the absence of a national debt cause a depression? Correlation does not equal causation. High tariffs (thanks, Republicans) and Federal Reserve money supply polices (thanks, anyone who voted to create the Fed) are much more plausible explanations for the Great Depression.
The stock market is at all time highs, but the real economy is steadily eroding. Plenty of speculative booms have occurred during economic crises. And would the stock market be less robust if the economy had not been subjected to 111 years of domination by the Fed?
The stock market was near all time highs just before the 1929 crash, too.
But that wasn’t what caused the Great Depression. We’d had at least one “crash” or “panic” every decade forever, and every time the economy recovered quickly. What changed this time was the government reaction – instead of allowing the weak and unprepared companies and investors to fail so the better ones could go on, Hoover took this as an opportunity to pass the Emergency Relief and Construction Act and Reconstruction Finance Corporation, involving government in running businesses like all good progressive fascists wanted. This held down the natural recovery.
In his election campaign, FDR stole the word “liberal” to pretend there was a difference between his progressive fascism and Hoover’s progressive fascism. Then he got power, and with NIRA he showed what the actual difference was – FDR would go much further! He held back the recovery for several more years, and possibly even did enough permanent damage that there was only one way left to revive the economy: Get involved with a World War, so the people would let him borrow money to start the factories again to fill government orders, then ship the products overseas and blow them up. When this war ended, the usual war-end depression was swamped by domestic consumers trying to fill a void in domestic goods that had been building up for several years. And also by foreign sales, since we’d blown up so many foreign factories in the process of destroying our surplus.
No no no. Debt is not an important issue. The important issues are: Policing bathroom behavior, child sex rings in DC pizza shops, and Hunter Biden’s penis.
Poor sarc.
Bookies in Ireland are struggling to calculate whether KuKlux book burners are going to cost Trump’s girl-bulliers the election faster’n Girl’s Bathroom tranny poseurs cost Biden’s warmunista partisans that same election. Observe that none of the polling guesstimates based on 2000 troll answers take notice of the possibility of Chase Oliver in 2024 getting the 4 million spoiler votes Gary Johnson got in 2016. In fact, those same 3.27% out of all 2022 eligible mainland + expat voters would yield 8 million votes. Sprinkle THAT over pollster guesstimates and see how those swinger states key-bump at the Sieg des Glaubens orgy November 5th.
Now tell us how much of that debt was Constitutional……
The USA is just repeating the [Na]tional So[zi]alist mistake.
An entire mountain of history; all having the exact same result.
Criminals don’t ever LEARN obviously. There must be a Supreme Principle to stop ‘armed-theft’ and it must be honored.
“how much of that debt was Constitutional”
All of it. Read the Constitution some time.
“The USA is just repeating the [Na]tional So[zi]alist mistake.”
The USA isn’t committing genocide against Jews.
Do read us the part that allowed COVID stimulus.
Do read us the part that allowed Medicare.
Do read us the part that allowed Social Security.
Do read us the part that allowed FAFSA.
Do read us the part that allowed etc, etc, etc, etc….
UR are either F.O.S. or you don’t know how to read. Which one?
Do you think it takes genocide of Jews to qualify as a [Na]tional So[zi]alism?
Some of the stupid sh*t leftards will say to justify their criminal ways.
Yell us again who you voted for? Oh right, the POS who sees the US Govt as a means to enrich himself, pay off his allies and bully votes to continue the grift. Fuck off with your faux concern over spending and taxation. In fact you supported the “bail reform” that puts murderers back on the street and the riots, assaults and looting over the “Summer of Love” so you can fuck right off with your justice reform opinions too you proggy twat.
Yell us again who you voted for? Oh right, the POS who sees the US Govt as a means to enrich himself, pay off his allies and bully votes to continue the grift.
Wait, he voted for Trump?
Yeah right. Trump was piss poor when he took office and is now rich. /s
I swear if you leftards didn’t know how to think upside-down you wouldn’t be thinking at all.
“Yell us again who you voted for? Oh right, the POS who sees the US Govt as a means to enrich himself, pay off his allies and bully votes to continue the grift.”
not really clear who it is you think they voted for.
Only 2 ways out, default or currency collapse.
And if there’s cleansing by nuclear fire those are just the natural order of things.
Why you waste time talking about eht national debt when there are still WALLS TO BE BUILT AND TARIFFS TO BE LEVIED!
You can’t make ‘Murica Great Again on a budget!
Ironically the levied tariffs makes foreign markets pay for the walls of self defense…
Why it’s almost like … It makes complete sense.
I’m shocked the US hasn’t collapsed under this debt like the old Soviet Union did.
I’m betting the US will collapse within the next four years, if that.
Then the finger pointing will begin in DC with no real answers demonstrating once again great civilizations are rarely brought down by outside force.
They rot from within.
not sure it is four years, but that is the path we are on.
I’m eager to fade that bet.
But what currency will the bet be paid in?
Migrant welfare industrial complex-govt jobs created. Magic money tree delivers for the social construct/border, cartels.
DEI bank fees 100s of millions, indefinitely, off the no bid contract in NYC.
Anti-westernciv leftists laugh their asses off.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/migrants-monthly-payment-in-nyc-is-higher-than-veterans-compensation/ar-BB1l0NEa
Let’s just print money!!
It’s almost like none of them learned ANYTHING from the Great Depression … where almost all of the developed nations of the world stacked up interlocking piles of risk so that when a single relatively minor crisis hit one of them, all of the rest of them came crashing down like “the Domino Effect.” With a track record like that – not to mention having learned nothing whatsoever from the 1918 Spanish Flu Pandemic – it’s a wonder The People have not learned yet to not let governments manage anything important. Maybe The People will deserve what’s going to happen to them next?
Except you and I are part of “The People”. I’ve never voted or advocated for any of this shit and from what I can tell, neither did you.
Using the actual number of votes cast in the 2020 election, if Chase Oliver corrals 3.28% that would be 5.2 million votes. If the Caucasians saddle him with an anarco-communist running mate that total could easily drop to 2.8 million–judging by past outcomes.
With Robert Kennedy in the race, the Libertarian candidate (unless it’s Kennedy himself) will be lucky to get 1 percent of the vote.
Why? Are libertarians such fools that a coincidental agreement on one issue will make them ignore Kennedy’s lifetime of anti-libertarian positions?
“how much of that debt was Constitutional”
All of it. Read the Constitution some time.
“The USA is just repeating the [Na]tional So[zi]alist mistake.”
The USA isn’t committing genocide against Jews.