Biden Touts More Forever Wars, Breaking His 2021 Promises
In his State of the Union address, Biden promised indefinite U.S. involvement in Ukraine, Gaza, Yemen, and beyond.

President Joe Biden came into office promising to get American troops out of "forever wars." Tonight, in his State of the Union address, he offered a vision of indefinite U.S. involvement in conflicts around the world.
In April 2021, speaking about the war in Afghanistan, the president railed against those who believe that "withdrawal would damage America's credibility and weaken America's influence in the world. I believe the exact opposite is true." Tonight, Biden attacked skeptics who "want us to walk away from our leadership in the world."
He began his speech with a plea for more U.S. military aid to Ukraine, arguing that "the free world is at risk, emboldening others who would do us harm to do what they wish." Later, Biden announced sweeping plans for U.S. involvement in Gaza.
While the U.S. military will build a new port in Gaza to deliver food to Palestinians—and, the president promised, "no U.S. boots will be on the ground"—the Biden administration will continue to arm the Israeli military campaign that Biden said "has taken a greater toll on innocent civilians than all previous wars in Gaza combined."
The Biden administration has transferred weapons to Israel at the American taxpayer's expense, and is providing targeting intelligence to the Israeli military. "Creating stability in the Middle East also means containing the threat posed by Iran," Biden added, touting his airstrikes on Yemen.
That air campaign has thrown a wrench into Yemen's peace talks—which, ironically, the Biden administration brokered a couple years before.
Biden positioned himself as a peace dove during the 2020 presidential debates, and one of his first major decisions in office was to go through with a long-planned U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. "It's time to end the forever war," the president announced in an April 2021 speech, rejecting an "approach where U.S. exit is tied to conditions on the ground."
"We have to have clear answers to the following questions: Just what conditions require to—be required to allow us to depart?" he asked in that speech. "By what means and how long would it take to achieve them, if they could be achieved at all? And at what additional cost in lives and treasure?"
Today, Biden answered those questions: The wars will continue for the foreseeable future.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Dang, did I beat AT to this one?
You sure did! : D
Anyway: While the U.S. military will build a new port in Gaza to deliver food to Palestinians
Please don’t do that. Don’t feed the terrorists, Joe. They’re like stray cats. Feed ’em once, and they’ll keep coming back.
Wait… are we going to poison the food? Because I’m on board with it if that’s the case. Kind of a roundabout way of dealing with this Iranian proxy state – I’d personally go with death from above – but I get it, Joe needs to look magnanimous for November.
Please don’t do that. Don’t feed the terrorists, Joe. They’re like stray cats. Feed ’em once, and they’ll keep coming back.
Huh. So I guess dehumanization is okay after all when it is against the people you don't like.
I certainly don't approve of terrorism, but your attitude of dehumanizing them is how we got to torture and waterboarding and indefinite detention at Gitmo.
Look at Herr Jeff who defended sarc calling people dogs as he called them cancers. Always the hypocrisy. Jeff also doesn’t understand what a simile and ignored the word like.
You are free to donate your own money to them. But you won’t. You want to force others to find them like a good socialist.
Considering the fact that you can't comprehend the difference between revenue tariffs and protectionist tariffs, it makes sense that you can't tell the difference between comparing you to a barking dog and comparing immigrants to vermin. Usually I can't tell if you're stupid or dishonest. In this case I'm going with stupid. 100%.
You really are retarded aren't you? Lol. I was the one who told you there are different reasons for various tariffs and they aren't all protectionist you retard fuck.
It's a simile. Like, "That guy's as strong as an ox."
He's not actually being reduced to the equal of livestock.
Here, you might find this useful:
https://www.edx.org/learn/esl-english-as-a-second-language
Oh and I'll just cut to the chase.
You spent a large part of the discussion on the IVF article proclaiming those embryos are really 'tiny humans' and condemning everyone else for failing to recognize that as 'dehumanizing' them. Well, that was all of course just an act. You don't really view them as 'tiny humans', not in any substantive sense. They are only useful objects for you to argue in favor of your real goal, which is to force humans to reproduce only in the manner that you and your team dictate. Anything other than penis-in-vagina sexual reproduction (and probably only missionary position too) is an abomination before God and must be banned and condemned just like Jesus would do. It's just more of the same Moral Majority bullshit from the 1990s.
What an absolute load of garbage. He did nothing of the sort. You think because you tell lies about someone's position with authority and in a measured tone, everyone will believe you.
It's never worked that way, Jeff. There's a reason why almost everyone here calls you "Lying Jeffy".
What does that have to do with feeding terrorists? Are you sure you replied to the correct article?
Too late. They now demand their victims continue to feed them as they get 10s of billions from other countries.
Let’s read Slade, Dahlmia, Boehm Riggs, Ciaramella, Weissmueller and Welch’s posts on the matter:
“I will cast my ballot for Joe Biden in Michigan, a swing state, because there is no bigger libertarian cause right now”
“Who do you plan to vote for this year? Joe Biden. The nationalists said the libertarian-conservative consensus is dead, and I take them at their word. Also, Stephen Miller is a white nationalist.”
“I will vote strategically… for Biden.”
“I will cast my first ever vote for president for Joe Biden in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.”
“I’ve been vacillating between sitting out this election, as I did in 2016, or voting for Joe Biden. The strongest argument for the latter choice is that it’s an opportunity to support the repudiation of both Trumpism and AOC”
“I’ll be voting for Joe Biden, primarily for three reasons: (1) A feeble president Biden seems like an opportunity to erode the power and glamour of the dangerous cult of the presidency and also push socialists, nationalists, and identitarians back to the margins, creating space for a more libertarian-friendly coalition to emerge.”
“If it was going to be close in my state, I might have considered holding my nose and voting for the person most likely to supplant the eminently fireable incumbent.”
I will vote for Jo Jorgensen—unless I believe there is a chance that Joe Biden will somehow fail to win Virginia, in which case I will vote strategically and reluctantly for Biden.
Looks like Mean Tweets were worse than the fascist mess America is now in after all, Reason.
You wanted this. Enjoy.
The hope that Biden might be feeble was at least not a mean tweets level of stupidity, but it did assume his handlers would be reluctant to do anything strategic. While that was what saved the US from Woodrow Wilson's handlers after his stroke, it was pretty damned stupid to think the same people who had handled him into the nomination would cease handling him after he won.
"Looks like Mean Tweets were worse"
Can we retire this vapid talking point once and for all?
Koch-funded libertarians don't prefer Biden to Trump because of "mean tweets."
Koch-funded libertarians prefer Biden to Trump because Biden won't even pretend to enforce the border.
Can we retire this vapid talking point once and for all?
Did you just mansplain Mother's Lament's concerns to them? 🙂
I hate to be the male bigot in the room [snorts] but it's entirely possible that 'mean tweets' isn't a specific talking point and shorthand for a whole bunch of stuff including your points, or even the distraction from it/them.
Yeap. Even on the border issue Reason pushed the narratives set up by media on Trump's statements like shithole country or pushing he called all illegals rapists and murderers. Even om border control Reason focused on words.
"Can we retire this vapid talking point once and for all?"
No. I enjoy it and it's a lot of fun.
So so dishonest. You fail to mention of course not only that Dalmia was fired, but also that the VAST majority of Reason personnel said that they were going to vote for Jo Jorgensen.
Why are you lying about them?
You imply he's lying about Reason by omission. In doing so, you also lie by omission.
"Why are you lying about them?"
Literal quotes from their 2020 article, unedited, and I know that you know that.
A more pertinent question is why are you lying about the quotes veracity? We don't call you "Lying Jeffy" for nothing.
Reason writers should be made to read this every fucking day.
It’s not like we had a 50 year record of his warmongering votes to look at. Oh wait..
Reason writers got fooled by a Democrat again.
"While the U.S. military will build a new port in Gaza to deliver food to Palestinians—and, the president promised, "no U.S. boots will be on the ground""
Will the US military personnel building this port be floating above the ground? This is self-contradictory and makes no sense.
Nah. They'll go bare-foot.
They'll all be wearing special-issued slippers?
Seems odd that Trump is bad for criticizing NATO not honoring their agreements and, therefore, weakening the alliance...
But Biden working to help the Jordanians in Gaza is NOT weakening our alliance with Israel.
Will the US military personnel building this port be floating above the ground? This is self-contradictory and makes no sense.
I think it's obvious we're going to build from the pier end and it's going to wind up being a pier to nowhere.
As damikesc points out but doesn't go far enough, IMO, this is specifically a trap being laid by the Biden administration to fuck over subsequent administrations and the US in general. They've VRBO'ed the White House and lured in a wild animal with some food so that the next occupant has to either continue feeding the animal to placate it or stop feeding it and deal with the consequences.
Did anyone actually watch the SOTU, and how did Biden perform? Apparently, he didn't fall apart, or there might be some mention.
Biden was Biden. Angry, stupid, hyperpartisan, undermining the legitimacy of parts of the government and electorate that has the audacity ti disagree with his party's radical Leftist vision of what a good government and society is.
Hey now. He claimed he implemented Unity.
After 2016, 2019, and the reaction to the AL IVF decision, I’m pretty convinced that he could take the podium give this message verbatim and, by the next day, the hivemind would have crafted it into a narrative and even reduced it to policy.
Tucker Carlson's response sums it all up perfectly:
"that was possibly the darkest, most un-American speech given by an American president. It wasn't a speech, it was a rant..."
I just am glad he mentioned the USC football coach who got murdered by an illegal.
From what I read he was shouting, spitting, off of a cocaine like high.
What I don't understand is how if everything so right and working so well, what the heck he's so angry about.
You know who else made a campaign promise of 'No New Nation Building' and then got unnecessarily involved in a number of foreign entanglements?
Sorry Matthew. If you believed Joe Biden was going to do anything except drag us into endless war you're just revealing your own stupidity. At this point Reason writers should stick to food trucks and zoning. You Fucked up. You got rolled. Now STFU.
Strategically and reluctantly, eh?