Archives: March 2024
Excerpts from Reason's vaults

10 years ago
March 2014
"In December, when the New York City Council voted to prohibit the use of e-cigarettes in public places such as bars and restaurants, the ban's backers conceded there is no evidence that vapor from the battery-powered devices poses a threat to bystanders. But they worried that e-cigarettes would sow confusion because they look too much like the real thing. Councilman James Gennaro, a sponsor of the ban, warned that children might mistake e-cigarettes for the conventional kind, conclude that smoking must be cool again, and proceed directly to a pack-a-day habit that would threaten their health and shorten their lives."
Jacob Sullum
"Smoked Out"
15 years ago
March 2009
"For conservatives and activists who have linked their lives, reputations and fortunes to the Republican Party, it's a time of reappraisal, retrenchment, and recrimination. Just six years ago, their team controlled the executive branch, both houses of Congress, and a majority of gubernatorial seats. Since then the party has fallen dizzily, weighed down by an unpopular war, a deadly hurricane, and a deepening recession. Republicans have lost control of the White House and Capitol Hill, and now hold just 22 governorships. What's particularly galling to true believers is that the candidate who knocked them off their perch, Barack Obama, is a man they labeled the most socialist, culturally liberal, and downright un-American foe they've faced since George McGovern."
Brian Doherty
"Conservatism's Hollow Defeat"
"Before the financial crisis, total taxpayer exposure via loan programs—the cost if every borrower defaulted—was about $500 billion, taking interest into account. With the additional guarantees now totaling more than half of GDP, taxpayers' exposure has grown exponentially while their ability to repay the loans has if anything shrank. Such a risk would seem to call for strict oversight of how these loans turn out, both in terms of default rates and social goods. Yet until now the federal government has refused to systematically measure the performance of its 40 existing loan programs. Why? Perhaps because the data show that most of them never deliver any of the promised social and economic value."
Veronique de Rugy
"Dissatisfaction Guaranteed"
35 years ago
March 1989
"The only beneficiaries of any farm subsidy are domestic farmers. Home consumers lose. Foreign consumers lose. Foreign producers lose. Taxpayers everywhere lose. The environment loses. Debt-ridden Third World countries lose. Pleasing farmers—and satisfying a vague need for 'food self-sufficiency'—is the only reason for agricultural subsidies. And in the United States there are 2.5 million farmers and $30 billion a year in subsidies; in the [European Community], 12 million farmers and about the same subsidy payout."
Marty Zupan
"The Farm Barrier"
40 years ago
March 1984
"It is not the United States alone, in an effort to prevent a nuclear confrontation with the Soviets, that has an interest in Israel's self-defensive capability. Israel itself, of course, has an acute stake in the matter. In the second half of this century Israel has been in more wars than any other country and presently seems heading toward the next one. As is always the case when a liberal democratic country goes to war, the cost to Israel has been high and little has been accomplished by way of preventing future conflicts."
Sam Cohen
"Wall Against War"
"Using the police power as a rationale, courts frequently sanction regulations imposing enormous financial losses on property owners and abridging their control over their own property. So long as these regulations are clothed in the proper police-power language—if a legislature proclaims that they were enacted to further the 'public health, safety, morals, or general welfare'—courts will normally see them as 'reasonable' and not examine either the motives of the legislators, the necessity for such measures, or the efficacy of the schemes. Zoning boards, planning commissions, city councils, and state legislatures are permitted to run roughshod over landowners' property rights, provided only that fraud, deception, or transparent favoritism are not conspicuously apparent. The rights to use, develop, enjoy, and transfer property—rights considered of intrinsic and preeminent importance by our Founding Fathers—suffer accordingly."
Ellen Paul
"Taking Liberty"
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
warned that children might mistake e-cigarettes for the conventional kind, conclude that smoking must be cool again, and proceed directly to a pack-a-day habit that would threaten their health and shorten their lives.
Now, of course, Reason advocates for bringing kids to bars where the explicit aim is to convince them how cool it is to hang out with half-dressed pedophiles with personality disorders. Once again, making even relatively hyper-puritanical and ego-driven liberals of even just a decade ago look, if not wrong, at least relatively level-headed.
These archives are going to be too embarrassing to print at some point, serving as a guidepost to gauge how far Reason has drifted from its original mission.
I'm glad they printed the snippet from Sam Cohen, the creator of the Neutron Bomb and proponent of a radioactive "Wall Against War" for Israel.
Israel sure could have used one on October 7th and the U.S. sure could use one on it's borders, as well as maybe miniature Mobile versions to protect shipping from today's Islamic pirates in the Indian Ocean.
This was from a time when Reason was on it's A game and was an innovation-touting, investigative, fighting, radical, Libertarian magazine that was a tower block even for mainstream media.
Please, bring this back!
Some things in the archives should stay there, including what Cohen wrote in Reason in 1984 :
“What I am suggesting is the construction of a border barrier whose most effective component is an extremely intense field of nuclear radiation (produced by the operation of underground nuclear reactors), sharply confined to the barrier zone, which practically guarantees the death of anyone attempting to breach the barrier… such a “nuclear wall”… can make virtually impossible any successful penetration by ground forces—as well as a preemptive ground attack by the threatened country… modern reactor technology can accomplish this with greatly improved efficiency.)… The gamma ray field in the immediate vicinity of the obstacle zone readily can be sufficiently intense that several minutes’ exposure will produce incapacitation and ultimately death… In a nutshell, …this holds out the possibility of peace for the Middle East… ”
Yep. Sam had the right idea and the technical know-how to carry it out.
He got a bad bum rap over the Neutron Bomb, which was meant not as an offensive weapon, but as a means to disable a Warsaw Pact tank onslaught against Western Europe. Ukraine could have had one of those and it would not have been in the news these past two years and Putin's Revanchism would just be his blue-balled wet dream.
This commentariat compounds Cohen’s tactical nuclear bomb problem, in that the idiots are far less than a village apart.