Brickbat: So Tired

New tires for automobiles could become more expensive and less safe under legislation proposed by Washington state lawmakers. The proposed bill would give the state Department of Commerce the power to ban the sale of tires it deems bad for the environment. The bill targets heavier and more durable tires, which sponsors say have greater rolling resistance, making them less energy efficient. But critics say the bill would effectively ban cheaper tires and make those that are sold less safe. "The easiest way to reduce rolling resistance is to reduce tread depth which will, in turn, reduce wet traction performance," said Tracey Norberg of the U.S. Tire Manufacturer's Association. "It'll reduce tire life, and it'll increase scrap tire generation."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm pretty sure I would enjoy a road trip to, say, Idaho to buy new tires if the idiots occupying the Central Committee of the Socialist Workers Paradise of Washington refuse to acknowledge the unintended consequence of their politically correct environmental narrative.
(Opens trenchcoat)
Hey Buddy... Wanna buy some TIRES!?!?!
I was thinking about the profitability in engaging in yet another grey market with my Washington neighbors.
I may quit my day job, if the ban monkeys continue.
If I were Idaho, I would start working on toll booths at all of the major crossings.
And tires would STILL be cheaper and safer from Idaho INCLUDING the tolls!
It's like the EVs. Worse for the environment, actually kinda dangerous in a lot of ways - but at least you get to virtue signal really really hard.
And that's all that matters to most folks anymore.
Just remember that everything progressives say/do in the name of the environment, is actually done in the name of their self-loathing hatred of humanity itself.
Like the man says:
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1719398881870356695
Let me see, they want everyone to drive EV's that are much heavier and wear tires much quicker, then make tires less durable . Got it.
Something, something, unintended consequences, something.
At some point the result of incompetence is so predictable that it's indistinguishable from actual malice.
Unfortunately, this is not an example of incompetence OR malice, despite the aphorism. The third alternative is that they know there will be consequences; that those consequences are INTENDED; and the consequences will give them a new excuse for the next round of "solutions" and their consequences. To be fair, putting your own personal lust for power ahead of the welfare of your constituents COULD be considered to be a form of malice, but in this particular case it's a game of political musical chairs with the culprits hoping they are not left standing when the music (eventually) stops.
Why do "libertarians" keep pretending that the consequences of fascism are UNintended?
Perhaps for the same reasons that "conservatives" vote for Trump, knowing damned well that He doesn't give a rat's ass about "conserving" the well-proven-by-history-by-now virtues of multi-party democracy and peaceful transfers of power? And that Trump doesn't give a rat's ass, either, about "conserving" my economic freedom to buy foreign-made goods, without high taxes tacked onto the tops of the prices of said goods? Or about "conserving" my freedoms to fully interact with those HORRIBLE illegal sub-humans who OFFEND many of us, by having been born on the WRONG sides of the lines in the sands? What IS Trump "conserving" these days (or trying to), besides his money, fame, power, and glory, anyway?
1. There is no actual evidence Trump didn't want a peaceful transfer of power. All the evidence is that he did.
2. We don't live in a multi-party democracy.
3. If the State is to exist, and to "own" property, it should act like a reasonable owner/manager of that property. That means it should exclude some people from that property. Or it means the State shouldn't "own" property or cease existing.
-An An-Cap who wouldn't vote for Trump with a gun to his head
Regarding that first one --
Trump spent four years trying every shenanigan he could to build that border wall, and every time Congress or the courts shot it down, he tried something else. That's about as far as you can get from acting illegally. Compare it to Biden and his student loan "forgiveness" nonsense.
There's not much I like about Trump, but he probably obeyed the law more than most recent Presidents.
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2020/06/26/appeals-court-trump-wrongly-diverted-25-billion-in-milcon-funds-for-border-wall/
Appeals court: Trump wrongly diverted $2.5 billion in military construction funds for border wall
The power of the purse belongs to Congress, NOT the POTUS, per the USA Constitution, plain and simple!
Yes, because how dare he divert military funds to protect the border of the country! Don't they know that "military funds" are strictly to be used for the defense of other countries (and by that we mean mostly to bomb innocent people from high altitude)?
Let's assume he acted illegally. So what? Presidents are thieves and murderers. It still does nothing to show that 3 of your claims were plain wrong.
-An An-Cap
Nothing "illegal" about it. Once Congress apportions funds to the Military it is up to the head of the Military how those funds are spent. At that time, the head of the Military was the Commander in Chief, President Trump.
Sorry SQRLSY your argument went out the window when Congress stopped passing Budgets.
Or declaring wars as well, I suppose!!! All of THAT crap is out of fashion for decades now!
I see you are unable to admit fault, and attempt the "whatabout" defense.
If you aren't going to be a serious logician, I fail to see why anyone should take you seriously.
I fail to see why anyone should take Trump's oath of office seriously... To support and defend the USA Constitution, in light of the above (and more), and in light of the below... Trump thinks that His Oath of Office is a JOKE!
The Meeting of the Right Rightist Minds will now come to Odor!
Years ago by now, Our Dear Leader announced to us, that He may commit murder in broad daylight, and we shall still support Him! So He Has Commanded, and So Must Shit be Done!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/24/donald-trump-says-he-could-shoot-somebody-and-still-not-lose-voters
And now, oh ye Faithful of the Republican Church, Shit Has Become Known Unto us, that Shit is also in His Power and Privilege Ass Well, to murder the USA Constitution in broad daylight. Thus He Has Spoken, and Thus Must Shit Be Done! Thou shalt Render Unto Trump, and simply REND the USA Constitution, and wipe thine wise asses with shit! Do NOT render unto some moldering old scrap of bathroom tissue! Lest we be called fools, or worse!
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html
Proud Boys, STAND with TRUMP, and stand by! And if ye don’t agree 110%, then we don’t need you polluting our world, because all who disagree with us in ANY way are LEFTISTS!!!
There, I think that’s a wrap! I’ve covered shit ALL! You can take the rest of the day off now.
(You’re welcome!)
More "whataboutism".
More inability to admit fault.
More red herrings.
More faulty reasoning.
More reasons to not take you seriously.
"I see you are unable to admit fault, and attempt the “whatabout” defense.
If you aren’t going to be a serious logician, I fail to see why anyone should take you seriously."
My comment about (implying at least) BOTH SIDES (for decades now) ignoring Congress's prerogatives of declaring (or not declaring) war was meant to be even-handed, NOT "whataboutism". In what way is criticizing both sides = = "whataboutism"? Do you even BELIEVE in making peace , and trying to find common ground? Or is it all about YOU and YOUR side?
More “whataboutism”.
More inability to admit fault.
More red herrings.
More faulty reasoning.
More reasons to not take you seriously.
More self-righteousness and straw-man-ism!
All right, unserious one. Let's take this in order.
1. I don't have a side. I'm an An-Cap. That being said, Trump is a lot less likely to try to kill me. He also has a lot less power, given the entire Deep State, MSM, Uniparty is against him on most things.
2. I'm not Straw manning. I'm pointing out your (many) faults. It's not hard, because you're acting like a political activist with TDS, not like an objective actor.
3. Maybe I am acting self-righteous. So what? What matters is if what I say is true, not the feeling you get when reading what I write.
4. You are using "whataboutism" when you ignore your own faulty claims about Trump and make up new claims (with dubious accuracy).
5. I'm not interested in finding "common ground", though there is much to be found with the default liberal if then were to wake up and realize they are being led by the nose to their doom.
I'm interested in finding truth.
I see you aren't. It's quite obvious to anyone reading what you write.
You aren't serious, so you shouldn't be taken seriously.
4. You are using “whataboutism” when you ignore your own faulty claims about Trump and make up new claims (with dubious accuracy).
"faulty claims about Trump", tell me all about it!
Der TrumpfenFuhrer ***IS*** responsible for agitating for democracy to be replaced by mobocracy!
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/24/politics/trump-election-warnings-leaving-office/index.html
A list of the times Trump has said he won’t accept the election results or leave office if he loses.
Essential heart and core of the LIE by Trump: “ANY election results not confirming MEEE as Your Emperor, MUST be fraudulent!”
September 13 rally: “The Democrats are trying to rig this election because that’s the only way they’re going to win,” he said.
Trump’s constant re-telling and supporting the Big Lie (any election not electing Trump is “stolen”) set up the environment for this (insurrection riot) to happen. He shares the blame. Boys will be boys? Insurrectionists will be insurrectionists, trumpanzees gone apeshit will be trumpanzees gone apeshit, so let’s forgive and forget? Poor Trump was misunderstood? Does that sound good and right and true?
It really should immediately make us think of Krystallnacht. Hitler and the NAZIs set up for this by constantly blaming Jews for all things bad. Jew-haters will be Jew-haters, so let’s forgive and forget? Poor Hitler was misunderstood? Does that sound good and right and true?
https://www.salon.com/2021/04/11/trumps-big-lie-and-hitlers-is-this-how-americas-slide-into-totalitarianism-begins/
Trump's Big Lie and Hitler's: Is this how America's slide into totalitarianism begins?
The above is mostly strictly factual, with very little editorializing. When I post it, the FACTS never get refuted… I only get called names. But what do you expect from morally, ethically, spiritually, and intellectually bankrupt Trumpturds?
Totalitarians want to turn GOP into GOD (Grand Old Dicktatorshit).
You seem to be unable to help yourself.
I could go through the motions of fact-checking your latest claims, but there's no point until you recognize your earlier failures.
You cannot accept reality.
You appear to be hopeless.
There is no reason to take you seriously.
https://www.salon.com/2021/04/11/trumps-big-lie-and-hitlers-is-this-how-americas-slide-into-totalitarianism-begins/
Trump’s Big Lie and Hitler’s: Is this how America’s slide into totalitarianism begins?
The above is mostly strictly factual, with very little editorializing. When I post it, the FACTS never get refuted… I only get called names. But what do you expect from morally, ethically, spiritually, and intellectually bankrupt Trumpturds?
You've not refuted ANY of this... Because you CAN'T!!!
Unserious One,
1. Repeating yourself is unserious behavior.
2. I'm not at all concerned that I cannot disprove a *Salon* article!
I just know, based on our short history, that you have zero interest in learning and (therefore) truth, and wouldn't recognize it if I did.
My time is precious, and you aren't serious, so people don't take you seriously.
You're almost as bad as the unHihnged one was.
By not even ATTEMPTING to read your links, I refute EVERYTHING that you say! Can you say, "arrogant"? Try it, I bet that you can do it! If you try REALLY hard!
Or is the below true of you?
AFTER one presents the facts (and the well-reasoned and ethical “right thing to do”, or FACTS to acknowledge...), and the stupid and evil still resist… Because they are stupid and evil… Then one has to shrug, and say to oneself, “all that is left to me now, sad to say, is to warn others that we are dealing, here, with stupid and evil people”. John the Baptist AND Jesus had to deal with the same thing. Or do you think that THEY were stupid and evil?
https://biblehub.com/matthew/23-33.htm
You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good? For out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks.
Unserious One.
There is no point to refuting your *Salon* article, if you refuse to recognize your previous errors, pointing out these errors will not help.
Do not misapply Scripture with me. You have no idea what I can do with that!
"But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people. They are the kind who worm their way into homes and gain control over gullible women, who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires, always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth. Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so also these teachers oppose the truth. They are men of depraved minds, who, as far as the faith is concerned, are rejected. But they will not get very far because, as in the case of those men, their folly will be clear to everyone." 2 Timothy 3:1-9
And yes, your folly is clear to everyone.
Continue to try to use God's Word against me, if you feel lucky, punk! You have no idea what you're in for!
Scripture-worshit gets us nowhere fast! LOVE worship is what gets us places! And Trump has NO Love in His heart, for ANYONE other than Himself! The evidence is plain to see, for all other than Trump-adoring ideologues!
HERE is what scripture-worshit gets you!
God COMMANDS us to kill EVERYONE!
Our that them thar VALUES of society outta come from that them thar HOLY BIBLE, and if ya read it right, it actually says that God wants us to KILL EVERYBODY!!! Follow me through now: No one is righteous, NONE (Romans 3:10). Therefore, ALL must have done at least one thing bad, since they’d be righteous, had they never done anything bad. Well, maybe they haven’t actually DONE evil, maybe they THOUGHT something bad (Matt. 5:28, thoughts can be sins). In any case, they must’ve broken SOME commandment, in thinking or acting, or else they'd be righteous. James 2:10 tells us that if we've broken ANY commandment, we broke them ALL. Now we can’t weasel out of this by saying that the New Testament has replaced the Old Testament, because Christ said that he’s come to fulfill the old law, not to destroy it (Matt. 5:17). So we MUST conclude that all are guilty of everything. And the Old Testament lists many capital offenses! There’s working on Sunday. There’s also making sacrifices to, or worshipping, the wrong God (Exodus 22:20, Deut. 17:2-5), or even showing contempt for the Lord’s priests or judges (Deut. 17:12). All are guilty of everything, including the capital offenses. OK, so now we’re finally there... God’s Word COMMANDS us such that we’ve got to kill EVERYBODY!!!
(I am still looking for that special exception clause for me & my friends & family… I am sure that I will find it soon!)
Unserious One
You lie when you claim I have "Scripture worship". I worship YHWH, no-one else.
I have no idea what Trump worships, other than his own ego. It doesn't matter. What matters is what he has done and what he will do. You lie when you claim certain things and refuse to recognize this, so engaging in any further claims is a waste of time.
"God COMMANDS us to kill EVERYONE!"
Lie #2.
Your logic is ...not terrible until you get here:
"And the Old Testament lists many capital offenses!"
Did you happen to read Deuteronomy 12:1?
"These are the decrees and laws you must be careful to follow in the land that the Lord, the God of your ancestors, has given you to possess—as long as you live in the land."
Are we ancient Israelites living in Palestine? No? Then the OT law does *not* apply to us.
But, then again, you missed another verse:
"It is mine to avenge; I will repay." Deuteronomy 32:35, quoted in Romans 12:19
And another, talking about how Christ fulfilled the Law:
"But He was wounded for our transgressions,
He was bruised for our iniquities;
The chastisement for our peace was upon Him,
And by His stripes we are healed."
Isaiah 53:5
So your assumption we should enact God's OT law, fulfilled in Christ, is wrong on 3 different counts.
Now, please stop looking a fool and attempting to argue Theology with me. You have literally zero chance, and you are acting just like the unHihnged one!
You are responding to an entity that admits to eating feces.
You are unlikely to make an argument that it responds to logically.
Just a warning.
Sounds like a great idea, with the best of intentions. What could possibly go wrong? https://reason.com/video/2024/01/19/great-moments-in-unintended-consequences-dollar-coins-fertilizer-ban-and-the-hawaiian-mongoose-vol-14/
...the power to ban the sale of tires it deems bad for the environment.
Which will be the excuse to secure the most government power: public health or environmental health.
Which will be the excuse to secure the most government power: public health or environmental health.
Yes
Hey, why have a state religion if we can't use doctrine to invent policy?
Everything humanity has done since we climbed down from the trees and moved into the caves has been bad for the environment. The nanny state is EXPERT at raising the alarm about the bad half of everything while ignoring the good half that more than compensates for the downside. The lust for political power gives them superpowers at ignoring or blame-shifting the “unintended” consequences of every narrative they impose on the public.
I wish I could make the entire Washington state legislature walk for twenty minutes down the streets of Seattle in 1898.
I wonder how long before they forbid beavers from building dams. ETA I see Longtobefree beat me to it.
Speaking of stupid arguments, the animal rightists who demand elephants, chimpanzees, and others be recognized as having human rights by the courts … I wonder how they square this with predators and prey. When chimpanzees kill each other, is that murder? How about when chimpanzees kill other species for food? I mean … it’s murder for humans to kill cattle for food, isn’t it?
Environmentalists, "Go kill yourself in the name of saving 'our' environment."
Facts are white supremacy.
So that's why the Post-modernist CRT types reject reality.
It's not really a 'why' so much as a 'how'.
But well meaning, tho... because climate change needs to be mitigated.
Just for the record, because the 'let's use the environment as an excuse for fascism' crowd won't admit it:
Man is a part of the environment.
What we do "to" the environment is no different than what the beavers or monkeys do.
You think beavers are making you hotter?
Depends on whose it is.
I live in Washington and I just called all five of my legislators and told them what an incredibly bad idea. Having lived in California. I know what happens when a legislature says we are going to approve stuff you were going to buy. Tire manufacturers are very invested in low rolling resistance and saving gas, however they will charge more for a tire that is Washington state approved.
It's adorable you think they're going to listen to you. Like they have to in order to keep their seat or something.
Nah, so long as they keep being Elected Official Not The Other Guy, their seat is locked.
So how many black markets has WA created in the past year? Let's see, weapons made of only one salt, Casper's guns, large capacity boxes with internal springs, arm or piercing ammo, teflon but not molykote coated bullets, dragon's breath, and soon "assault tires" and no doubt "ghost" tires.
Why not just go whole hog and merge with Cali and OR? Oh right, that would dilute their individual political power.
Great post! Your insights are always appreciated. Looking forward to more from you. Keep it up!
top 5 engineering colleges in coimbatore
top computer science and design colleges in south india
Fantastic read! Your positivity is contagious, and I love the way you break down complex topics. Can't wait for your next post
Top WordPress web development service providers in Coimbatore
WordPress website development Coimbatore
The good news for WA State drivers is that the Pacific Northwest has a notoriously dry climate, and traction in rain/snow/icy conditions is rarely an issue.
The actual good news is that the only vehicles in Washington State which move fast enough to be dangerous have Oregon, Montana, or California plates and likely will have some level of access to decent tires regardless. At least that's the case in the Pugeot Sound area which is home to most of the worst drivers in the english-speaking world.
"the Pacific Northwest has a notoriously dry climate"
I hope that was sarcasm. I have not spent much time in Washington, but I know the coast is so rainy there is even a rain forest. I did spend a summer in Coos Bay, Oregon, and it rained _hard_ every day. Your tire treads better be deep, or you'll hydroplane.
If you are planning to buy tires, then you should carefully consider the choice. There are always solutions like Michelin tires, and this will always be an excellent, most proven option when you definitely don’t have to doubt the quality of the tires. But if you're looking for more budget-friendly options, the modern tire industry has a wide range of brands and manufacturers to choose from.