Are Parents Too Involved in Their Adult Children's Lives?
A recent Pew survey says parents are "very involved in their young adult children's lives," but one might quibble with the definition of "very involved."

"Parents Are Highly Involved in Their Adult Children's Lives, and Fine With It," declared the front page of The New York Times on February 9. "New surveys show that today's intensive parenting has benefits, not just risks, and most young adults seem happy with it, too."
Is that true, though? Perhaps it depends on what you consider "intensive."
The article discussed a recent Pew Research Center survey that included a rather large swath of young adults—people between the ages of 18 and 34, everyone from high school seniors to working stiffs googling "gum pain." Separately, it surveyed parents of people that age.
One of Pew's key findings was that "parents are very involved in their young adult children's lives." It judged this in part by the fact that 73 percent of parents say they text their kids "at least a few times a week."
If that's very involved, then I'm super involved with my sister, my friends, and my political discussion WhatsApp group (even though it drives me nuts). But I wouldn't say I intensively parent any of them. Texting is so easy and fast that texting family members "at least a few times a week" seems far more normal than excessive.
Then there's the fact that young adults "turn to their parents for advice at least sometimes on their jobs, finances and even their physical health." Wouldn't it be weird if they didn't? And a little sad? And how are they supposed to find a good periodontist?
I am on record as recommending that young kids do some exploring on their own without a communication device. That way if they get lost, or their bike chain falls off, they have to figure out what to do next. They can't just call a parent. I dearly want them to develop some problem-solving skills and independence. Childhood is the time to do it.
Then, by the time they're young adults, with any luck (truly a factor), they're resourceful and capable. But that's not the same thing as having a ton of resources or being capable of everything. So they turn to us, not because we're helicopters, but because we are happy to help.
Not every problem of young adulthood requires bootstrapping.
Ah, but the survey also found that many parents help out their adult children financially. They are more involved when the kids are 18–24 and less involved as the years go by. Is that intensive? Intrusive? Well, young adults are going to college in record numbers and racking up record college debt. I'm not actually sure that college is the best path for everyone, but at the moment it's still popular. Helping young folks get their financial footing doesn't strike me as being a destructive enabler. (Maybe because I've done it myself.)
I know there are some who think that any assistance after a certain age is coddling. But I actually think it's time to flip that.
Give them independence as kids. Let them play, explore, take some small risks without adults always supervising. They'll see that you believe in them. That helps them believe in themselves. You're there for them without overprotecting. I realize there are a lot of fuzzy lines, but basically, I'm talking about trust: You trust that your kids can handle some things. They trust that you're there for them when they can't.
That's the beginning of a nice relationship. Or, as my husband put it: "At some point, it's not the whole parent-child thing. It's just family."
That makes for a boring headline. But it's true.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Give them independence as kids. Let them play, explore, take some small risks without adults always supervising. They'll see that you believe in them. That helps them believe in themselves. You're there for them without overprotecting. I realize there are a lot of fuzzy lines, but basically, I'm talking about trust: You trust that your kids can handle some things. They trust that you're there for them when they can't.
As the Father of two 'launched' GenY young adults, Lenore Skenazy, you hit it perfectly.
Some day I will read about a study showing that studies are a waste of time and money.
Whew. It's always good to see a Lenore article. For a minute there I was worried someone might cue up the trailer to that 1969 Charlotte Rampling movie raking nazi arms merchants over the coals. "The Damned" is not on Netflicks or Amazon Crime near as I can make out. Not a surprise since is the nearest thing to the movie version of Oedipus Rex that Tom Lehrer made fun of.
I like my daughter (32, married, with her own daughter) and my son (29). Both work full time, maintain their own homes and lives, and live in adjacent states. And I think they both like me, and at least tolerate visits and just occasional hanging out together. We trade texts multiple times a week, phone or FaceTime a couple of times a month. They still ask for advice occasionally, as do I (mostly when I need IT help from my son). I have tried to make clear that I am here if they need me, especially for big life challenges, but they are responsible for their own lives.
Let's be real though. How many "people between the ages of 18 and 34" really qualify as adults in the functional definition of the word? A disturbing number of them are in therapy, in squalor, in serious debt, raising children without an established livelihood, on drugs, obsessed with their social media persona, and/or literally can't tell which restroom to use.
These are not functioning members of society that can or should be left to their own devices. They haven't the first clue how to exist in the world without a constant IV drip of validation and affirmation.
FFS, "adulting classes" are offered for them. And there's an active and growing market for it! These are the people who can't wait to turn the Wall-E society into a real way of life.
A wealthy free market can support a certain amount of useless bottom feeders. The problem of course is we have toi damn many of them. It's draining resources.
Young adults who do not have the backstop of affluent parents are at a serious disadvantage for achieving success of any kind in life. Early adulthood is no time to be performing without a net.
That is such total BS.
You're an idiot.
No, you're an idiot. If you truly believe that the only (or even "most") successful people in the world are those coming from generational wealth, then you're an idiot.
And probably a racist as well, since that's the same BS that left-wing morons tell inner city black and brown people in order to keep them from aspiring to anything more than their gangs and ghettos.
Go pick up a biography of Andrew Carnegie. Or Howard Schultz. Or Sheldon Adelson. Or Larry Ellison. Whatever "serious disadvantages" you think exist are directly proportional to how hard you're willing to work to overcome them.
Entitlement babies like you probably don't understand the first thing about things like hard work, work ethic, and overcoming adversity. You just expect everything handed to you, and when it's not you blame everyone but yourself for your lot in life.
Pathetic.
Well, too bad their parents are wastes of space who had a kid because it was the cool thing to do.
"New surveys show that today's intensive parenting has benefits, not just risks, and most young adults seem happy with it, too."
Most “young adults” seem happy with living at home and having Mom and Dad pay their bills too, so you’re not wrong.
Cite?
One of the things that's wrong with modern society is precisely the loss of family support networks. With modern technology we no longer need to be physically located in a particular spot to make a living and live our lives, and that's a good thing. But what is lost when families and neighbors and childhood friends scatter to the four winds is the part of the relationship that cannot be replaced by texting and facebook. One of the good things about growing up on a farm was that neighbors helped each other out in the bad times and celebrated the good times together. I once attended a wedding in Hallettsville attended by over a thousand people, with several hundred attending the reception at the KC Hall afterwords. This "study" simply documents how family networks are being maintained in the aftermath.
There's a very easy way out of that problem, if it's a problem:
Get a job, move out, stop taking their money, visit at Thanksgiving.
Lenore's point was that it isn't a problem—that there's nothing wrong with parents who can afford it giving their children a leg up.
There is, actually. Those children never learn true independence and self-sufficiency.
You're confusing what she's saying for something along the lines of the prodigal son. The door to family should always be open to a child that's gone out in the world, lived foolishly, and winds up back home with their tail between their legs so they can regroup.
But that's not what the article is talking about. Lenore is talking about "not ... having a ton of resources or being capable of everything."
For a child to grow into an adult, they need to experience that. Not have mommy and daddy shield them from it.
What she's talking about is not, "I tried, I failed, and I want to come home to get back on my feet."
It's failure to launch.
It's never taking the training wheels off the bike. It's a safety net that makes them unafraid of falling, and thus never learning from the real world how not to fall. It's bailing a kid out of their second, third, fourth stint in jail or rehab.
Yes, there is something VERY wrong with that.
Are Parents Too Involved in Their Adult Children's Lives?
That's for the adult children and their parents to decide, not for Pew or you.
Paying my Mepco bill onlinehttps://mepcobillcheckers.pk/ has been such a breeze! It's convenient, saves time, and eliminates the hassle of standing in long queues. Plus, with just a few clicks, I can ensure my electricity bills are sorted without any stress. Highly recommend embracing online payments for a seamless experience!
That's the beginning of a nice relationship. Or, as my husband put it: "At some point, it's not the whole parent-child thing. It's just family."
Yes, but as a parent, you never ever ever stop worrying about your kids' happiness.
Worry or not though, it is their life, not mine. And I tell them that!!