Jon Stewart's Return to The Daily Show Was Actually Pretty Great
When he's on his game, he's still one of the best bullshit detectors in the media.

When I read that Jon Stewart was returning to host The Daily Show on a part-time basis, I felt myself visibly cringe.
"Why do this to yourself, Jon?" I thought. Stewart had left the show at what seemed like the right moment: in August 2015, just before American politics got so absurd that it became the punchline rather than the set-up. In a memorable then-final monologue, Stewart pleaded with his audience to guard against "premeditated, institutional bullshit, designed to obscure and distract." The best of Stewart's comedy had always been drawn from that well: exposing the bullshit of politics by layering clips of the same politician saying two hypocritical things, then looking straight into the camera with that wry grin of his. Gotcha.
But in 2024, is there anything to be gained from pointing out that our leaders are power-thirsty hypocrites? We all know that Donald Trump contradicts himself and lies regularly. We all lived through the nonsensical and ever-changing mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic. "It won't work anymore, Jon," I thought. "You can't fix this."
I might have only been half-right. No comedian or commentator is going to fix what's broken in American politics. But after watching the first of Stewart's new episodes (he's going to host the show on Mondays only), I'm glad he's back. It's possible—maybe even likely—that he'll say something godawful next week or fail to keep the momentum going for very long. For now, however, I think his style just might still work.
Jon Stewart kicks off The Daily Show's election coverage with a wellness check on America's two chronologically challenged candidates: Joe Biden and Donald Trump. pic.twitter.com/RPmFodvVAy
— The Daily Show (@TheDailyShow) February 13, 2024
Two moments from the show stood out. First, in a segment focused on the presidential election, Stewart demonstrated that when he's on his game, he still has one of the best bullshit detectors in the media. He rolled out clips of a half-dozen Democratic officials and surrogates claiming that, behind the scenes, President Joe Biden is competent, capable, and mentally strong.
"Did…anyone…film…that?" Stewart asks, grimacing at the camera. "Because if you're telling us behind-the-scenes he is sharp and full of energy and on top of it and really in control and leading, you should film that. That would be good to show to people."
It brought to mind the one moment during his eight-plus year retirement when Stewart made headlines: a smash-and-grab appearance on The Late Show, where he skewered the then-official story that the COVID-19 pandemic wasn't the result of a lab leak in Wuhan, China.
In both cases, the American public is being told one story but common sense suggests something totally different could be true. When that happens, Stewart is one of the few people in media willing to suggest that you ought to trust your own mind first and foremost—or, at the very least, that you ought to be skeptical of what those in power are saying.
That people like Stewart and Bill Maher—whom Matt Welch interviewed in the current issue of Reason—have to do this sort of thing through the lens of comedy speaks volumes about the lack of critical voices within the political media, particularly on the left. Neither should be confused for a libertarian, even though they might express libertarian views at times. But the importance of having truly liberal commentators calling out the bullshit from both right and left is more important than ever, and there are all too few of them.
Predictably, Stewart's riff on Biden's age has drawn criticism from left-leaning commentators accusing him of ignoring the greater threat posed by Donald Trump's candidacy.
Stewart had a message for that crowd last night too: "What's crazy is thinking that we're the ones, as voters, who must silence concerns and criticisms," Stewart said. Telling voters that their eyes and ears are lying to them about Biden's faculties will probably work about as well as trying to write off the lab-leak theory as disinformation.
Later, after rattling off the many, many reasons why Trump is unfit to be president, Stewart put a finer point on it: "The stakes of this election don't make Donald Trump's opponent less subject to scrutiny. It actually makes him more subject to scrutiny."
It was a strong, tight, acerbically funny performance—but Stewart saved possibly his best bit for the very end, when he urged Americans to remember that life does not revolve around the presidential election. (If you don't want to sit through the rest of the monologue, do yourself a favor a skip ahead to the 6:28 mark and watch it.)
All the attention paid to the election in the next nine months is going to "make you feel like Tuesday, November 5, is the only day that matters," Stewart said. "And that day does matter, but, man, November 6 ain't nothing to sneeze at or November 7. If your guy loses, bad things might happen, but the country is not over. And if your guy wins, the country is in no way saved."
"The work of making this world resemble one that you would prefer to live in is a lunch-pail [bleep]ing job day in and day out," Stewart continued. "I'm not saying you don't have to worry about who wins the election. I'm saying you have to worry about every day before it, and every day after it. Forever."
It's another one of those things that's obviously true even though so many public officials and so much of the media are trying to claim otherwise: The outcome of one election is not going to save or destroy America. The idea that politics is the solution to all our problems makes as much sense as ignoring the possible role of the Wuhan lab in the origins of COVID or claiming that a pair of doddering elderly men are the best options to lead the country.
When your common sense clashes with what you hear in the media, check for bullshit.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"The stakes of this election don't make Donald Trump's opponent less subject to scrutiny. It actually makes him more subject to scrutiny."
QFMFT.
"A little nostalgia for the old folks!"
Destroyed political discourse by making a bunch of liberals believe mugging = intellectual response = ftw
>>just before American politics got so absurd
may literally and millenialliterally be a result of this fuckstick's nightly schlock
It says something about Boehm that he thinks Stewart was a bullshit detector, and what it says is not good.
It also says this is where he gets his news.
Which explains a lot.
It also tells you who got his vote, right TDS-addled shit-pile Eric?
“When he’s on his game, he’s still one of the best bullshit purveyors in the media.”
Fixed that for Mr. ReluctantBidenVoter Boehm.
The closest Jon Stewart got to being evenhanded was a dishonest false equivalence both-sidez stuff... with a heavy sub-text of...(but we all know you had better still vote (D) - its better because - reasons..)
Just like Bill Mahr
Maher thinks Gavin Newsom would be a great president. That tells you everything you need to know right there.
+1
Pretty sure that was a response to the Bush admins mugging = intellectual response = ftw. But I'm old enough to know it didn't start there either...I blame either Marx or Susan B Anthony.
the irony of Marx appearing on television ...
"I find television very educational. Every time someone switches it on I go into another room and read a good book."
If Karl Marx had been Groucho Marx, the world would be a much better place today.
Could not agree more. I genuinely believe this smug twat deserves more blame than any other single person for the current state of our politics. Fuck. That. Cunt.
It's another one of those things that's obviously true even though so many public officials and so much of the media are trying to claim otherwise: The outcome of one election is not going to save or destroy America.
MOST! IMPORTANT! ELECTION! EVER!
I'm (not) surprised you didn't yelp at Boehm for reluctantly, strategically, only writing about Trump's lies. BOAF SIDEZ, isn't that one of your mantras?
C'mon man!
You don't understand, for Sarc that's (D)ifferent.
John Stewart, during his Daily Show run was one of the most pernicious purveyors of bullshit in media. It was marked by maliciously edited interviews designed to make the guest seem to say things he actually did not. Stewart was something of a cancer on political punditry with his clown nose off, clown nose on routine when facing any criticism of his noxious behavior.
MAGA Translator:
QUIT USING THE STUPID SHIT WE SAY AGAINST US!
Biden Translator:
Ignore EVERYTHING we say that casts u in a bad light.
Media - As you wish.
That's nice, except I am not MAGA.
Fair enough.
It seems that MAGA has crowded out the few sane Republicans (like Mitt Romney).
Be nice if actual conservatives broke out of the Trump Party and formed a new Republican Party. Then libertarians could try to remake that old alliance based upon economic liberty that Trump destroyed.
Define actual conservatives for us? You keep denying you support neocons. So explain.
Classical liberals who oppose Progressivism.
Barry Goldwater - who I actually revere politically.
Goldwater would not be a Republican today.
Nor would he be a Democrat.
Goldwater was a populist, not an establishment conservative. The liberal-adjacent northeastern wing of the party hated Goldwater's guts, agreed with the Democrats that he was an extremist, and thought he was going to get us in a nuclear war.
Stop with the pesky facts.
Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?
You're ruining Plug's schtick, Red Rocks.
Such as who?
Nice of you to adopt shrikes lie though.
He can't name what that entails either.
They tend to like to legislate their morality, and libertarians are at odds with that. But libertarians and conservatives tend to agree on economic issues where today's right has gone completely off the rails.
And progressives don't legislate their own morality? What do you call Illinois's ban on so-called "book bans" other than an attempt to bring books that essentially are pornographic into elementary school libraries and curricula? What do you call legislation that mandates that one can use whatever washroom one feels his/her "gender" is today? Those legislate a morality, just a different morality.
Great retort to a strawman argument I never made, and great use of the Trump Defense.
Do you deny that they legislate morality, just a different morality?
"Great retort to a strawman argument I never made"
You literally just did:
"They tend to like to legislate their morality"
You mean like not castrating mixed up children, or only having two sexes, or not killing fetuses or babies, or not forcing experimental inoculations, or not putting hardcore porn in school libraries and classrooms, or not prosecuting their political adversaries?
Yeah, that's pretty bad. All that legiSLatiNG MoRaLitY.
You guys seriously this retarded? The question was "what are conservatives" and you guys are outraged that I didn't start trashing the people you hate while answering the question? Wow. More proof that you can't ever reach Peak Stupid.
ICP - that's a calculus joke that you'd get if you understood the stuff you say about inflation is nonsense.
Sarc, you’re a drunken moron loudmouth. You’re in no position, educationally or cognitively, to criticize anyone here. Relatively speaking, you are an insect among men.
Now fuck off back to the piss soaked alley where you live, like so much Oscar the Grouch, you drunk pussy.
Not just pornography, but literally pornography…… aimed at children!
Those people should be burnt at the stake.
Be nice if actual conservatives
I know I have to keep saying this until the end of time, but the "actual conservatives" terrified the GOP elites who ran the party, for decades. It started with the ideological split between the northeastern and Midwest/western wings of the party, represented by Goldwater, who wanted to see New Deal programs rolled back entirely, and the Dewey/Taft wing that supported keeping them in place in muted forms.
The character of the Goldwater wing was ALWAYS populist and nationalist (what the Left pejoratively termed "jingoistic"). There's a reason the two most consequential convention speeches in the GOP's history the last 60 years were Reagan's speech at the 1964 convention, and Sarah Palin's at the 2008 convention--because they galvanized the actual populist character of the GOP's voters.
When Reagan became a real threat to become president, it was the "actual conservatives" who worked to keep him off the ballot--first by supporting Ford in 1976, then Bush or John Anderson in 1980. They didn't jump on the Reagan bandwagon until after the "Morning in America" commercial in 1983 and his subsequent stomping of Mondale in 1984. And what happened right after Reagan left office? They went right back to pimping milquetoast establishment candidates--the Bushes, Dole, McCain, and Romney--rather than populist choices.
The so-called "actual conservatives" don't actually conserve anything, by their own admission--they just ensure the car hits the wall at 40 mph rather than 100 mph. But hitting the wall still totals the car.
"The so-called “actual conservatives” don’t actually conserve anything, by their own admission"
Masters of the universe, with their little magazines and affected mid-Atlantic accents that made them sound like Frasier Crane’s gay uncle, perpetually explaining the subtle parallels between George W. Bush and Seneca.
They gave up any sense of obligation to honest debate a long time ago. Grappling with the actual arguments on the table takes effort, and gets in the way of stoking the unearned sense of superiority to which they're addicted.
“old alliance based upon economic liberty that Trump destroyed.”
Trump didn’t destroy anything.
The last Republican President before Trump passed the largest expansion in our Entitlement system, Medicare Part D, until ObamaCare. He supported the TARP bailout of the banks, endorsing the idea of “Too Big to Fail.” Created the Department of Homeland Security, signed the PATRIOT Act, and launched the War in Iraq. All actions endorsed or supported in some way by the Republican Establishment, the “Maverick” McCain and Mr. RomneyCare
So what did Trump destroy that wasn’t already obliterated previously by the Republican Party? Much as I loved Ron Paul and the Tea Party they didn’t control a thing in that Party.
Yes.
Thank you. I have been saying the same for years.
Trump is Rewarmed Big Gov Bushism.
"Trump is Rewarmed Big Gov Bushism."
Trump was no libertarian, but W. was faaar worse. Criminal Justice Reform and Foreign Policy alone puts him well above W.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"Thank you. I have been saying the same for years. Trump is Rewarmed Big Gov Bushism."
Yeah, that's pretty much the opposite of what he just said. Looks like both you and Sarc both took Jeffy's misattribution lessons lately.
You know who has been pushing the Bushism neocon doctrines here lately though? You.
Did you make a new sock to make it look like someone agreed with your laughable bullshit Kiddie Raper?
So what did Trump destroy that wasn’t already obliterated previously by the Republican Party?
Any pretense of support for economic liberty.
And what, Sarc, have the Democrats done for economic liberty lately?
Prosecuted Trump.
Nothing. They’ve always opposed economic liberty, oh Strawman Slayer Supreme.
Then why don't you back off and view the bigger picture?
Because he wants to troll, ITL. Why else?
Why can't you acknowledge that libertarians and the GOP once had, but no longer have, economic liberty in common?
Sarc hates Trump more than he could ever possibly love America. He would see the world burn if it meant imprisoning or murdering Trump. Especially if he got some booze out of the deal too.
"Any pretense of support for economic liberty"
LMAO. Sorry man I'm afraid Bush and the Establishment of the GOP beat him to it.
Such as what sarc? Reducing regulations? Tax cuts?
Let me guess tariffs. But those you point to also issued tariffs.
Why can you never argue with specifics?
Because Sarc hates Trump and anyone who might show any sympathy for the man. Did I mention he hates Trump? He's blinded and forgets the actual history behind anything, and did I mention he hates Trump? He also stumbles through Reason in a hangover, and did I mention he hates Trump?
Yes I know you don’t understand the difference between tariffs for revenue and protectionism.
Not going to answer the question, are you drunky?
I see you avoided the question. To whom aew you referring to? The old guard ALL issued tariffs. So who exactly are you referring to?
You are ignorant enough to seemingly believe trump was unique regarding tariffs from the conservative view point. It is odd. Because generally those you prop up as good conservatives also defended tariffs at some point.
It’s a sin tax, like taxes on sugar or alcohol or tobacco, except it’s on imports. The purpose of the tax is to change behavior. Get people to not commit the sin.
With protectionist tariffs, buying stuff from “those people” is the sin.
I oppose all sin taxes. You should try it sometime.
If you were honest you'd agree that there's a difference between a sales tax for revenue, and a special sales tax on sugary drinks.
By your argument they're both sales taxes. There's no difference. Both tribes made sales taxes. What's the big deal?
Sarc, your dumb drunk ass can’t tell the difference between structural tariffs and tariffs used as a negotiation tool. So really, you have no business commenting about any of this.
As usual.
"Yes I know you don’t understand the difference between tariffs for revenue and protectionism."
There is no difference.
Yup. I can't think of any liberty that Trump embraced.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Bingo.
He monetized political faux outrage.
And then when challenged on his bullshit, he would hide behind "hey, I'm just a comedian"
We all know that Donald Trump contradicts himself and lies regularly.
Well there are a few dumbasses here that don't know that. I hate to name names but they are Jesse, Mothers Lament, Insane Troll, and Sevo among others.
Trump doesn't lie. He says things he doesn't mean. That means he can't be held accountable for anything he says unless one of The Faithful, like those you just mentioned, first determine if he really if he meant what he said or meant something totally different.
Here's the difference.
Trump say's Nazis and communists are vermin, and you and the press lose your shit about dehumanization. Trump says to some countries "Pay your bills", and you and the press scream he's inviting Russia to attack.
Joe on the other hand has a drawer full of burner phones, 5,400 emails from 3 fake email pseudonyms, conducted 20+ phone calls with Hunter's foreign oligarchs, and received $50 million in foreign influence peddling income, according to Congressional accounts, into 20+ shady Llc's via dozens of shady bank accounts, paid out to 9 different Biden family members and lies to congress about it all, and you and the press go "He's just forgetful".
Joe calls women "dog faced pony soldiers" and you breathe a sigh of relief and go "No mean tweets".
Joe lies about his son's death in Iraq, about how his wife was killed by a drunk driver, about being jailed during the civil rights struggle, about being jailed with Mandela, about fighting gang bosses, about his stance on Iraq, he plagiarizes speeches, lies about his education, lies about his son's laptop during a presidential debate, ad nauseum, and you just shake your head and go , "Oh, Joe".
Trump says to some countries “Pay your bills”, and you and the press scream he’s inviting Russia to attack.
He also said that he'd tell those they would want protection from to do whatever they want. That's the part people are objecting to.
So you, like a predictable troll, attack those critical of the second part for being critical of the first part. I'm sure there's a name for that fallacy.
“I’m sure there’s a name for that fallacy”
It’s called being a Sarcasmic.
"He also said that he’d tell those they would want protection from to do whatever they want. That’s the part people are objecting to."
It would not be our concern one way or the other.
If you're not an ally, we have no business demanding much of anything in regards to you.
Honor your treaty and we will be concerned for you then.
Literally not true, but what do you expect from a retarded demshill.
Sac will always selectively respond, and always lie on the process.
turd, the idiotic ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
That people like Stewart and Bill Maher—......... have to do this sort of thing through the lens of comedy speaks volumes about the lack of critical voices within the political media, particularly on the left.
So true.
Bill Maher and Bob Costas of all people SAVAGELY attacked Democrats on 'Real Time' over the weekend.
Bill Maher: “I like Gavin Newsome because he is a winner!”
Notably, while he is *still* currently bitching about authoritarian COVID overreach, specifically in CA, all the time.
He has now spent tons of time lamenting the lockdowns, mandates, and how shitty of a time COVID was, and somehow makes absolutely zero connection to the guy that ended the COVID state of emergency like a few months ago.
It's the same as always. "Politicians are corrupt weasels...but not MY politician, he's great!".
Maher is on the cusp of an enormous epiphany. You can see it.
He's either going to embrace it and become the most ferocious adversary of the establishment and the Democratic party we've ever seen, or he's going to get scared and pull a Howard Stern, retreating into fear and parroting received wisdom.
Nope! … he is not. He has chosen his side. epiphany suggests he lets honest reasoning lead him to uncomfortable conclusions that he feels compelled to accept. He will never accept any conclusion that has him voting against the Dems.
He rails against those things that are obviously anti-reason that hurt his sides chances in the next election cycle. He does this to help his side. All the things he rails against are absolute insanity and yet he rates those not as bad as orange man bad – because…?
He gets conservative cred for his (often well written and witty) diatribes against the excesses of progressivism BUT he knows he knows those things he points out would never convince anyone watching him to change their vote from D.
If he ever thought he might convince a dem voter to switch to R he would stop complaining IMMEDIATELY and go back to dishonest characterizations of conservative principles and policies.
Just refer to the ‘I like Newsom.. he’s a winner’ comment from Mickey Rat above. No amount of cognitive dissonance will change his politics - because it is not dissonance. It is something he will put up with as the cost of doing his own style of progressive business.
Maher's brain break moment with PBD shows he is going to choose the establishment.
When confronted with the very simple "what good results does Newsome have in CA" his brain literally broke to pieces because he knows admitting the policies he and his chums pushed for decades have broken CA.
But he regularly has people like Schiff, Newsome and the like on. Which is fine for debating and holding their feet to the fire. But he will never go where he needs to (holding them to account) politically because he knows they will shun him. He wants to keep being able to rub shoulders with all his Hollywood pals and political elite, and if he stops ass kissing, they will give him the Joe Rogan pariah treatment and he will only be able to book guests that are "alt-right" (read: not democrats)
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
I used to find Maher and Stewart occasionally mildly funny. Not often enough or funny enough to watch the Daily Show, but ... meh ...
Comedy has a liberal bias.
Even the ones who eventually wander into the Wingnut Bubble (like Adam Corolla and Dennis Miller) lose their comedic edge once they get there.
Dennis Miller lost his comedic edge. lol
Has he had a gig since the NFL thing?
He stunk at that.
no idea. I liked him on MNF ... Miller > Booger Macfarland
turd, the fucking ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
If that's true, why can't the left meme?
I wondered about this claim because I have seen any number of witty or clever left-wing memes and a fair number of crass and humourless right-wing memes and then I realised I was considering the wrong thing.
The purpose of these memes is, of course, not to persuade or to win a debate or to impress neutrals, but to reinforce existing views.
Put it another way, in the US, the right are better at propaganda than the left and that may be a function of those doing the propagandising or those on the receiving end of it.
I wondered about this claim because I have seen any number of witty or clever left-wing memes
I don't believe it, but please feel free to prove me wrong and share one of those witty and clever establishment left memes.
To be fair, it will be something that his kind consider funny. Not something actually funny. Trevor Noah’s stint on the daily show was like that. Not funny in any way, but snarky far left wingnut propaganda and an applause sign for the drones in the audience. Bill Maher’s show is the same.
"The purpose of these memes is, of course, not to persuade or to win a debate or to impress neutrals, but to reinforce existing views."
I guess I don't understand the difference between reinforcing existing views and propaganda; and persuasion, debate and changing neutral minds. I also don't understand why you think that's significant in the current context.
Comedy needs an element of truth to be funny. It's hard to craft humor for people who get outraged at the truth.
God damn. So this is why you are the Hannah Gatsby of humor on this site. No elements of truth, just narratives.
Thanks for explaining.
Drunksplaining?
So what is a woman, again?
And that would explain why the left isn't funny. Now do the right, Sarc.
I don't know. Personally I find you hilarious, Sarc. Easily my favorite Lolcow.
You're like watching a living Tom Green gag or a head-on collision at 80 by two clown cars.
"Comedy needs an element of truth to be funny. It’s hard to craft humor for people who get outraged at the truth."
That you are saying this in defense of the Left is endlessly amusing.
LOL, meanwhile, Norm MacDonald was slagging liberal sacred cows up until his dying day.
All the stars are here!
Comedy has a liberal bias.
Then why does The Onion suck and why is The Babylon Bee one of the funniest things going?
Progtards seem to have had their sense of humor surgically removed, along with their balls.
Comedy has a liberal bias the way liberalism has an authoritarian bias.
[sips coffee]
Proggies are full of hate. That’s why. It’s what drives them. For an example, see the last eight years of progs and Trump.
Hahahaha, goddamn
And yet Greg Gutfeld has the highest ratings of all the late night shows.
It's not funny because these guys can only function as gadflies in an environment where their side is the perpetual underdog and isn't the majority. Now that their side controls America's institutions from the schools to the mass media to the corporate boardroom, their edge is completely blunted.
They have to criticize the establishment for their comedy to have any actual bite, and that's not possible right now because they ARE part of the establishment now. That's why Norm MacDonald's comedy was so fucking hilarious, because he actually spoke truth to power by slagging Hillary, OJ, and the left-liberals in the media.
That's a good point. Lefty comedians still like to pretend that they are the counterculture outcasts, but they are largely now just boosters of the establishment elites.
>"in August 2015, just before American politics got so absurd that it became the punchline rather than the set-up.
Whenever I see shit like this I imagine the writer screaming **TRRRRUUUUUUMMMP* like Kirk yelling into his communicator.
>”We all know that Donald Trump contradicts himself and lies regularly. We all lived through the nonsensical and ever-changing mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic. ”
**TRRRUUUUUUUMMMMMPPPPP!**
Well, uh, Boehm I have some news for you –
1. Biden’s got a 50 year record of lying and contradicting himself – especially as President.
2. No, no we all did not live through the “nonsensical and ever-changing mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic.” You might have. Your coastal bubble might have, but out here, in flyover country, we just did what we thought best and government didn’t really get in the way much. But then again, we’re a buncha Trump-voting, deplorable, MAGADIOTS, right?
A man who believes White Privilege and The Patriarchy exist, has no bullshit detector.
When he's on his game, he's still one of the best bullshit detectors in the media.
Eric, Yogi Berra called, he wants is bullshit detector that's 90% correct 50% of the time back.
“I just want to say to all those people, the next time you get an operation, you just say to the doctor ‘Take that liberal bulls–t somewhere else, you come in here with no covering, you don’t wash those hands and you stick them on my open wound because I’m an American." - Jon Stewart, commenting on the efficacy of masking and those opposed, June 25, 2020
You're suggesting that a good bullshit detector can't produce it as well?
Yeah, the invocation of Yogi Berra in response to “when he’s on his game” is only 50% of the issue with Boehm’s quote.
The “best bullshit detectors in the media” really is a “the best bullshit sommelier cow in the pasture”.
“There is good news on the pandemic. I was talking to my Dr. Aaron … Rodgers, and it looks good. It’s almost over,” Stewart, 58, began his bit at New York City’s Alice Tully Hall. “He read something in a bathroom. I don’t remember what it was. How the f–k does a quarterback not understand the concept of protection? Prevention and protection!” - Nov. 2021
Jon Stewart couldn’t detect his own bullshit if he were standing neck deep in it.
Can't wait for everybody else's bullshit detectors to detect the bullshit you and he are peddling and for this shit to tank.
And this isn’t The Daily Show he left years ago. It’s a crippled, rotting husk. Leftovers from that unfunny hack Trevor Noah.
" We all lived through the nonsensical and ever-changing mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic. "
Uhhh, sweet-heart? There weren't any mandates or lockdowns. It was all your imagination.
Please, everything about this guy is fucking bullshit, including the fake name he uses.
Your name is Jon Leibowitz bro. I know the hiding your Jewish identity thing was considered mandatory in Hollywood a hundred years ago, and maybe you even felt like you had to in order to establish yourself, but it's 2024 now, you're in your fucking sixties, and you've been firmly established in American culture for decades now. It's really pathetic that you're still ashamed of your heritage and identity!
I'm guessing there was a reason Stewart started his first episode with a funny, gentle criticism of Joe Biden. That leaves the rest of the episodes to move on to more important things.
Probably aren't enough Mondays between now and the election to fully explain the existential danger of Orange Man. He'll wear out that wry Gotcha Grin way before November.
Stewart's first show was wonderful. I howled with laughter, instead of feeling nauseated with revulsion after reading the morning paper's New Journalism promise of ever-greater Armageddon.
He eviscerated the news media. I often disagree with him politically, but he has the magic formula.
Cool story bro. Somehow I doubt that reflects reality.
I thought Stewart was funny back in the day. Then i heard that an entire generation was getting their 'news" from this guy. Thankfully I'm not of that generation so I walked away relatively unscathed. Dave Chapelle on the other hand turned me into a transphobe. That bastard.
“We all lived through the nonsensical and ever-changing mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Didn’t most of those come from Democrat governors and the CDC that was actively covering up Fauci’s involvement in all of it?
And then Biden came into power, adding vaccine mandates that lefties like Stewart cheered.
So he abandoned "My Body, My Choice"
Jon Stewart aka jon Leibowitz is just another anti American jew hiding his identity
Seems we have a new Nazi shit pile in attendance.
Yeah, all the hate spewed at Jon Stewart around here for being an unfunny, narrative-distorting, leftist shill and, for some reason, Jew has to be tossed in. Like he's somehow exceptionally worse (or better) than Trevor Noah, John Oliver, or Stephen Colbert because he's Jewish.
I'm as down for using terms like Shylock, Kike, Heeb, Hymie, Jewboy, etc. as the next guy, but at least make it pointed or relevant and not just aimless piling on.
agreed
Sorta like Maddow; plenty of reason to despise the woman without making fun of her name or sexual proclivities.
Agreed.
But in 2024, is there anything to be gained from pointing out that our leaders are power-thirsty hypocrites? We all know that Donald Trump contradicts himself and lies regularly. We all lived through the nonsensical and ever-changing mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic.
I despise Donald Trump. He has done nothing - as a candidate or former President or candidate again - to earn my vote. Stewart can point out Democrat garbage clowns. Why can't you in an article about Stewart doing so?
The fact that you can't bring yourself to pillory Biden, specifically, for those same exact contradictions and regular lies is garbage. Or Newsom. Or Kamala. Or Obama. Or Hochul, or Whitmer, or Inslee, or ALL those Democrats equally deserving of scorn and derision as Trump reveals your slant.
You could have easily said: "We all know that Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Gavin Newsom, Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, Kathy Hochul, Gretchen Whitmer, Jay Inslee, and countless other politicians contradict themselves and lie regularly."
But you didn't. You focused on ONLY Trump, to the exclusion of all others. What, are you afraid of showing that the meter points more in the blue direction?
This is why people end up supporting that fat orange clown. Because people like you piss them off enough to drive them into his camp. How do you "journalists" NOT see that?
Auron has it 100% right. "You don't hate journalists enough. You think you do, but you don't."
LOL, Reason kissing Jon fucking Stewart’s ass and cheering on his tired, mendacious bullshit.
I guess the election’s coming sooner than it feels. Get ready for more of this silly nonsense from FJB’s “reluctant supporters” in the entertainment industry.
John Stewart return for the 2024 election is great. As is the continuing presence of Bill Maher. Both are great for calling out bullshit, something politics supplies in great quantities. We know both run to the liberal side, but both these comedians also callout both sides. What I think infuriates many conservatives is there is just more bullshit coming from the far right. As crazy as the far left is, it just doesn't have the volume to pump out the same amount of BS. Also, the far left has its center left critics like Stewart and Maher. There really are few if any center right critics that can take on the far right.
You're totally not a Democrat! Except for how you frame everything from the Dems' perspective.
Say what you want about the old school liberals like John Stewart, but at least they had introspection. At least they could look at themselves, see their faults, and spin humor out of it. The NEW school liberals cannot. That's why their humor is not funny. Their jokes about the right side of the spectrum are not funny, and there are no jokes about the left side. "Humorless fucks" is the term, I believe.
So yeah, as much as the Limbaugh crowd absolutely hated Stewart in his heyday, because he poked fun at "no new taxes", he's still light years ahead of Trevor Noah.
Jon Stewart's return to The Daily Show was a much-needed breath of fresh air, seamlessly blending wit with insightful commentary. His unique ability to dissect complex issues with humor and candor is unparalleled. Speaking of unique tools, have you ever tried out Calculette Mauricette? It's a fantastic online calculator that simplifies complex equations effortlessly. Give it a go and crunch those numbers with ease! Check it out here: https://calculettemauricette.net/