Chuck Schumer Attacks Lifesaving Zyn Nicotine Pouches
Zyn pouches are a dramatically safer alternative to smoking.

Less than three months after launching an attack on energy drinks, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.) has a new target: Zyn nicotine pouches.
In a press release Sunday, Schumer labeled Zyn a "quiet and dangerous" alternative to vaping, claiming that with the decline in smoking, tobacco companies are adapting by focusing on new products like oral nicotine. Zyns are small pouches of nicotine meant to be placed between the lips and gums. Two strengths of the product are available at three and six milligrams of nicotine, and they come in several flavors.
Schumer's ire appears to have been raised by the rapid growth in sales of nicotine pouches and so-called "Zynfluecers" on TikTok promoting the product. Schumer fears nicotine pouches could become a teen trend, as vaping did in 2019 before rapidly declining as the tobacco age was raised to 21 and schools became more aware of the problem. To head off a potential increase in youth nicotine addiction, Schumer wants the Federal Trade Commission and the Food and Drug Administration to investigate the marketing of Zyn and potentially restrict their flavors.
But Schumer's framing has the story backward. Zyn is not a dangerous alternative to vaping but a dramatically safer alternative to smoking. One of the reasons smoking has declined substantially over the last decade is because safer nicotine alternatives like vapes and Zyn are switching smokers away from cigarettes. The closest equivalent for which we have decades of data is an oral smokeless tobacco called snus. Snus is most prevalent in Sweden, and not coincidentally, Sweden has the lowest smoking and lung cancer rates in Europe because those interested in using nicotine do so in a much safer form.
Schumer is right that nicotine pouches are enjoying enormous sales, but he would be wrong to assume nicotine-naive youth are driving these sales. According to the National Youth Tobacco Survey, only 1.5 percent of middle and high schoolers use nicotine pouches, and just 2.3 percent have ever tried a nicotine pouch. Even among the minority of young people who use products like Zyn, most are not nicotine newbies. A study of adolescents and adults aged 15-24 who used nicotine pouches found the vast majority were smokers or had smoked cigarettes in the past at 73 percent and 81 percent, respectively. Just like with e-cigarettes, nicotine pouches disproportionately appeal to people who are already using nicotine most often in its most dangerous form, which is cigarettes.
Schumer's concern that Zyn comes in several flavors like cinnamon and citrus is also misguided. For one, Zyn has already applied to the FDA to be authorized for sale, and the agency will determine whether it presents a net benefit to public health. But suppose flavors in nicotine products are inherently youth-appealing, as Schumer suggests. In that case, he should be just as outraged that nicotine gums, which have been around for decades, are sold in flavors like "cinnamon surge," "fruit chill," and "spearmint burst." Nicotine flavor bans have a poor track record in improving public health, with bans on flavored vapes associated with an increase in cigarette sales.
Schumer's intervention drew mockery on X (formerly known as Twitter), including from Republican lawmakers and conservative commentators defending Zyn. The reaction is perhaps unsurprising, given that Tucker Carlson is the most famous Zyn consumer.
The most worrying aspect of Schumer's demonization of Zyn is that it contributes to the false impression that just because something contains nicotine, it's a threat to public health. What makes cigarettes so lethal is not nicotine but setting tobacco on fire and inhaling the smoke.
Divorced from smoke, nicotine is a relatively benign stimulant with a similar risk profile to caffeine. Most adults incorrectly believe vaping is just as bad or worse than smoking. If these misperceptions were replicated for products like Zyn, the most likely effect would not be saving kids from the grips of nicotine addiction, as Schumer hopes, but to keep smokers smoking. Dr. Jeffrey A. Singer of the Cato Institute lamented the constant fearmongering around nicotine, writing, "I can only think of one explanation: an unfounded and irrational fear of nicotine. I call it nicotinophobia."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You can take my Skoal Mint Classic* from cold dead hands, Moobs.
*it will be next on the list of bans.
I don't even like the flavored shit. Copenhagen Longcut is pretty much the only thing I go for.
I'm a sucker for the menthol taste; one of like 5 white guys in the world that smoked Kools (in my heady college days, before returning to Skoal).
the green can was less in your face with the flavor. when I started it was $1.53/can
My dad smoked Kools, so that was the first thing I smoked. I did not, however, stick with menthols.
You racist or something?
Basically, he doesn't like it because Tucker Carlson does.
Less than three months after launching an attack on energy drinks, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.) has a new target: Zyn nicotine pouches.
Gee, it's as if anything that people use to escape their sad, dreary lives, he takes issue with.
Only the government can provide relief from your misery. All else is false hope.
Pouches don’t pay billions in the tobacco settlement, so forget it.
These don't even use tobacco to derive the nicotine.
Bingo. New York State has borrowed heavily against the tobacco settlement money. They can't afford for the the tobacco industry to have a downturn.
Fascists are only happy when they are banning something.
Guy Bentley's back.
Still gets my vote for Reason contributor with Best Name.
...
What problem?
That teenagers do stuff their not supposed to be able to do until they are adults. Clearly just one more ban will put an end to all of it.
People having fun and enjoying life. Puritans hate that.
Quit nicotine twice, last time for good. I do kind of miss it. But man it was difficult. Chantix helped, though I didn't like the side effects. Neither did my coworkers since one of those effects was excessive flatulence.
>>Zyns are small pouches of nicotine meant to be placed between the lips and gums.
so like a spit or swallow thing?
So, what ever happened to “My body, my choice”?
Some decades ago I was explaining to strangers that libertarians were "pro-choice on everything". I mentioned a few specific issues of public policy on which we were "pro-choice". The people I explained this to didn't understand what I meant. Not that they disagreed or were skeptical, but that they didn't understand the concept of "choice" as applied to anything but abortions — which of course meant they didn't understand it with regard to anything, including abortions. So to a great swath of the English-speaking world, "choice" in matters of public policy is just a euphemism for abortions. it especially boggles their minds when "my body" or "one's body" is brought up in connection with "choice" as regards anything but abortions or birth control.
I've been saying this for years and the author almost admits it but here it is again. There is zero evidence that people use tobacco because they are addicted to nicotine. None. I can walk into any drug store and buy nicotine in numerous forms. Gum, lozenges, patches. Pick your poison. Been that way for half a century. In point of fact most of the nicotine in tobacco goes up in smoke unlike the alternatives. But smoking is a lot more fun. Human beings have enjoyed tobacco for thousands of years. Just like they've enjoyed beer and wine and pyote and cannabis and mushrooms and thousands of other things. I've been burning tobacco for almost 50 years and I've watched easily half of my friends from my generation drop dead from shit that had nothing to do with smoking. But I'm still here and my lungs are just fine. Fuck this bullshit. You can parse it anyway you want but prohibition is still prohibition whether there are "safer alternatives" or not.
I think big tobacco has gotten the blame for way more cases of lung cancer than they are to blame. There are so many other things causing lung cancer but it’s easier to blame smoking for everything. I remember telling my cousin -who is a doctor btw- about a young woman I knew who died of lung cancer and never smoked a day in her life, was an athlete and by all measures lived a healthy lifestyle. The doctor at the time couldn’t believe this and called BS. I do believe her attitude has changed on the subject over the years.
Schumer & Co. want you numb and stupefied. Nicotine and caffeine have the opposite effect. Note that the WEF is also trying to ban coffee.
The elites are ok with nicotine gum because big pharma makes it. Zyn is a rival
I use Zyn and nicotine gum for focus. It also helps me be more outgoing at parties and the like. Never smoked much of anything else except weed. Contrary to popular belief, it does not seem to be addicting for me? I can take it weeks on the trot or not without any perceived effort.
Schumer and other regressive Democrats demonize and are trying to ban Zyn for the exact same reasons (since 1985) they've been demonizing and lobbing to ban smokeless tobacco products, snus and e-cigarettes (but not deadly cigarettes).
Since 1985, Big Pharma (i.e. J&J, GSK, Pfizer, etc.) has given hundreds of millions of dollars to create and control the
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, as well as financially reward their partners at the
American Cancer Society
American Heart Association
American Lung Association
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Medical Association
The Society for Research on Nicotine, and
hundreds of other medical, nursing, healthcare, scientific, PR and lobbying groups to greatly exaggerate the very low risks of smokefree (i.e. noncombustible) tobacco products, falsly claim they are target marketed to children, and lobby to ban them solely because smokeless tobacco, vapes and dissolvables have been rapidly growing in sales, while sales of their FDA approved Nicorette, Nicoderm, Chantix and other ineffective smoking cessation products have remained stagnant (at about $1 billion per year since 1990).
Although cigarette smokers greatly reduce their risks of lung cancer, emphysema, heart disease and many other diseases by switching to far less harmful smokefree tobacco/nicotine products, Big Pharma and its army of PR agencies/lobbyists (who falsely claim to be public health advocates) have prevented the CDC, US SG, DHHS, state/local health agencies from truthfully informing smokers that they can sharply reduce their disease and death risks by switching to smokeless tobacco, snus, e-cigs, Zyn and other smokefree alternatives.
Simply put, Big Pharma and their lobbyists have been lobbying to kill smokers since 1985 (under the deceitful guise they are helping smokers quit smoking).
Thanks for another excellent article on tobacco harm reduction products Guy.
You've written dozens of these articles since we first began corresponding more than a decade ago when the Big Pharma lobbyists and their purchased allies at FDA (especially former GSK lobbyist Mitch Zeller) lobbied FDA to ban e-cigarettes (in 2009, which the federal courts struck down in 2011), and then imposed regulations to ban >99.9% of the million plus e-cigarette brands now on the US market.
Although Big Pharma controlled FDA has now legally banned virtually all e-cigs, they still haven't begun to enforce their cigarette protecting ban (except for Juul).
Thanks to vaping, teen cigarette smoking has declined 90% since 2010 (from 22% to just 2%), young adult smoking (18-24) has declined by 70% (from 22% to 7%), and overall adult smoking has declined 50% (from 22% to just 11%).
How about that federal deficit?
ChuckyU - We must regulate these Zyn pouches!!!
How about China agreesion in Asia?
ChuckyU - We must regulate these Zyn pouches!!!
How about that porous border illegals and terrorist are coming across.
ChuckyU - We must regulate these Zyn pouches!!!
How about congress passing an actual budget instead of continuing resoltions.
ChuckyU - We must regulate these Zyn pouches!!!