4 Reasons Why Dean Phillips Could Shock Write-in Joe Biden in New Hampshire Tuesday
Though alas, the long shot primary challenger probably will not.

Did you hear that Andrew Yang, the ninth-place contestant in the 2020 Democratic presidential primaries and fourth-place finisher in New York City's 2021 mayoral primary, endorsed Rep. Dean Phillips (D–Minn.) for president in New Hampshire Thursday? Probably not, but here's the quote anyway:
"Joe Biden has been an accomplished and substantial president. I endorsed him and voted for him in 2020 and was even a campaign surrogate," Yang, the founder of the Forward Party, said in his prepared remarks. "[But] while he was the right candidate four years ago, he is not now….The president is 81. All of the things that a candidate must do to be successful—travel, project energy, rally, meet voters, conduct interviews, call surrogates—all of them will be more difficult with an older candidate whose team will be concerned about him stumbling, literally or figuratively, at every turn. The candidate matters! It will be hard to reinvent grandpa."
Yowch!
The whole candidacy of Phillips, a three-term congressman from Minnesota and Talenti Gelato magnate who turns 55 Saturday, has been that Biden is too old and unpopular to prevent Donald Trump from retaking the White House. "I adore Joe Biden," he said just before launching his campaign. He is more hawkishly supportive of Israel and gung-ho about using the U.S. military to free American hostages, he criticizes Biden's handling of the southern border, and he has of late learned to love Medicare for All, but otherwise, his ideological and issue set is largely indistinguishable from the president's.
On a national level, Phillips's quest to dislodge the incumbent is more than a long shot—Biden is averaging 70 percent in the polls, compared to Marianne Williamson's 7 percent and Phillips's miserly 3. But Phillips is front-loading his challenge as an early-primary exercise, and New Hampshire is notoriously prickly toward incumbent presidents.
Harry Truman lost here in 1952 to Estes Kefauver and promptly withdrew from the race. Eugene McCarthy's shocking 42 percent second-place finish against Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 would within the calendar month impel LBJ to drop out and Bobby Kennedy to jump in. Pat Buchanan's 38 percent in 1992 rattled winner George Bush, arguably signaling his then-surprising weakness in the general election.
In the state's sparse polling to date, Phillips sits in second place, at an average of 10 percent, with Biden at a still-daunting 58 percent. Am I saying there's a chance? Well, the most recent survey has the race closer, at 49-16, but more importantly, there are four weird reasons why the stars may yet align.
1) Biden's name isn't even on the ballot Tuesday. The president and his lackeys at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) tried to strongarm New Hampshire into no longer holding the first-in-the-nation primary, and when the Granite State refused to budge, the crude rule-rewriting they imposed meant that the president was barred from officially campaigning there, unlike Phillips, Williamson, Vermin Supreme, and 20 other candidates.
The upshot is that New Hampshire Democrats are "pissed"—that's according to the head of a Biden-supporting super PAC, mind you—and find themselves scrambling to convince insulted residents to write in the president's name so that he can save face.
The DNC has pre-emptively declared the results "meaningless," and won't seat any delegates from the voting. Former state Democratic Party chair Ray Buckley countered in a fun NBC News story that, "It's safe to say in New Hampshire, the DNC is less popular than the New York Yankees."
All in all, fertile ground for disgruntled voters to deliver an outsized protest vote!
2) There are a YUGE number of undecideds. In the Jan. 8-10 WHDH TV/Emerson poll (where the percentage-point spread among the three candidates was 49-16-5), 3 percent of respondents fell into the category of "other," and a whopping 27 percent were still undecided. That is highly unusual in the run-up to a primary, but has been the norm in this race: A Dec. 18-19 St. Anselm poll, for example, found 29 percent of Democratic New Hampshire voters "unsure," compared to just 3 percent of Republicans.
And those polls cannot capture one of the most idiosyncratic dynamics of New Hampshire, which is that A) there are more undeclared voters (343,300) than either Republicans (268,000) or Democrats (262,000), and B) they can decide at the polling booth which party's primary they'd like to crash.
It is true that last-minute deciders could break for the boring old guy who insulted their state and is nowhere to be found on local airwaves or at pancake breakfasts. But does that really sound like New Hampshire?
3) The most committed anti-Trumpers might choose to vote in the Republican primary instead. "Approximately 3,500 Democrats in the state switched their party registration to become undeclared voters, or independents, ahead of the October [registration] deadline," Fox News reported this week. "Part of that effort was led by former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who recently dropped out of the race, encouraging voters to take every opportunity to turn out against Trump."
That is not a huge number, sure, but it speaks to a dynamic that might move particularly many of the aforementioned undeclared voters: If you are a New Hampshirean motivated by a strong desire to avoid another Trump presidency, where do you get the most bang for your buck? Voting for Nikki Haley in the GOP primary.
Biden, whose whole 2020 selling proposition was that only he in the Democrats' crowded field was normie enough to take on the Bad Orange Man, can no longer count on that constituency, at least while the Republican race is still contested, and easily infiltrated by otherwise reliably Democratic voters.
4) The 2024 presidential election just has too much weird anti-rematch energy to NOT get expressed at some point. Joe Biden's approval rating, Gallup noted last month, is "worse than other modern presidents at [the] same point." The polling gap between Americans describing themselves as "dissatisfied" and "satisfied" has been wider than 50 percentage points since August 2021. Independent Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is polling higher than any nontraditional presidential candidate since Ross Perot. No Labels (whose congressional Problem-Solving Caucus Dean Phillips was a co-founder of) is cracking its knuckles on the sidelines.
Would I place a sizeable 50-50 bet on Dean Phillips winning in New Hampshire, or even coming with 10 percentage points of Joe Biden? Oh, hell no. But as a fan of political competition, and proud member of the anti-rematch majority, I'm admittedly desperate to see any green shoots poking up through the political desolation.
Or as Andrew Yang said, "To journalists and influencers, wouldn't you rather cover a real primary process rather than slump into the battle of the 80-year olds? Dean's victory could be one of the greatest stories of this era."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I can see Democrats wanting not-Trump. But who the fuck is enthusiastic about Biden? Apparently some people are (or pretend to be anyway).
No one is enthusiastic. But Biden beat Trump once, so he's a known factor. Basically that's it. It's the pablum they know versus the risk they don't.
Sure, I think that's most people. But I've actually talked to people who say they think Biden is doing a great job. WTF?
Read the following report to learn how a single-mom with 3 kids was able to generate $89,844 of annual Qs income working in her spare time online from her home without selling...
For More Visit Here....> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
If the Dems had a better option, they should have prepped one.
Someone in their brain trust thought Harris or Buttigieg was presidential timber, when it's obvious they're not even close.
And the top Dem governors like Cuomo and Hochul and Whitmer and Newsom are obvious crooks or conmen.
And any of them would whip Trump’s ass in a properly fortified election.
I completely disagree with Yang - Biden was never the right person to run for president. And he's been the least qualified, least effective, and most conspicuously corrupt president in the nation's history.
He also has some of the worst approval ratings you've ever seen. Remember when the media used to talk about that stat constantly?
https://abcnews-go-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/trump-tops-opponents-biden-hits-new-low-approval/story?id=106335244
Even most of my lefty friends think he's the worst. Which is why I'm so surprised when I encounter someone who thinks he's doing great.
And he’s been the least qualified, least effective, and most conspicuously corrupt president in the nation’s history.
Well, that's a little strong - we did have Chester Arthur, after all, who was about as nakedly corrupt as they come. But Biden's not far off from that, for sure.
If Biden wasn't so effective I have to wonder why so many Republicans are pissed. I don't agree with hardly anything he does but he has managed to get some shit done. Probably more effective than Trump.
Well, he sure fucked up the border. That's something, I guess.
Don't forget all the new proxy wars the US is sticking its dick into now as well.
The "shit" Biden has gotten done is what angers people.
Biden and the country would have been better off if Biden had done nothing
You can replace Biden with the name of any past President and be as equally correct.
"Biden was never the right person to run for president."
He was pretty good for the Democrats in 2022 during the mid terms when it was widely assumed they would take a drubbing but out performed expectations.
Could Shock Write-in Joe Biden in New Hampshire
Well at least a shock would be a sign of life.
Those shocks are the only option to keep his heart (if he has one) going.
"The DNC has pre-emptively declared the results "meaningless," and won't seat any delegates from the voting."
I wonder what would happen if New Hampshire retaliated by threatening to keep the democrat nominee off the general election ballot if their delegates aren't seated.
It's the DNC's game. They can do what they want. The Democratic Party is not a government agency, they do get to make their own rules. It's entirely up to their membership. Ditto for Republicans.
Remember BernieBros whining about super delegates? It's the same thing. The party gets to make the rules for the nomination. That these decisions are made in smoky backrooms is because party membership is find with smoky backrooms. If you don't like it, you can work to change it for the next election.
The party gets to make the rules and the taxpayer gets to pay for the election.
I really think this is a problem and that there should be no official legal status for parties. No state run primaries, no straight ticket voting, no party affiliation listed on ballots, no automatic ballot access for a party's candidate. Parties can run their own selection process and every candidate has to meet the same requirements to get on the ballot whether they have party backing or not.
And any game where one contestant gets to set the rules is by definition rigged.
What do you mean Biden can't travel? He comes to Pennsylvania about three times a month! [Quite handy to spending the weekend at his home in Delaware. Remember when pols couldn't wait to live in the White House?
Dr. Jill's husband can't wait to get out.]
My lawn sign: "Anyone but Biden/Trump, 2024"
So you're a Jill Stein kind of guy?
"Joe Biden has been an accomplished and substantial president. "
WTF? He must think we are as dumb as he looks. I noticed this rather broad accolade is lacking in any specifics as to substantial and accomplished.
But now, just over three years since inauguration, "It will be hard to reinvent grandpa."
It's not that I mind all that much being lied to, or spoken to like a fool, but FFS.
Several years ago, when Biden was still mentally sharp, he was renowned as a bumbling incompetent with a notable lack of accomplishments. I'm sure he hasn't improved now that he doesn't know what day it is or what job he holds.
Maybe they think longevity means something. It doesn't. He's become President "Being There". Though Chauncey Gardner was probably sharper than this guy.
Write-in candidates never win. It serves Biden right for trying to rig the primary calendar. He depends on the low information Super Tuesday voters to win. His handlers knew he would do poorly in a state where he actually had to go out and meet the voters face to face, because they would realize he is a mentally incompetent octogenarian.
Didn't one win as a write in in Alaska not too long ago?
It’s Alaska. All 20 of them meet to decide who the candidate will be.
One thing that always amazed me is how Democrats can keep licking the trough of despair. FDR got 12-years of the Greatest Depression the USA has ever experienced, and then and still today, the Democrats PRAISE the complete disaster.
...then again; I guess I just haven't come to terms that the Democrats are literally prideful enemies of the USA in every way shape and form. Heck... I've just been believing it was just ignorant, greedy stupidity.
"licking the trough of despair. "
I like that turn of phrase.
I really hope Vermin Supreme finally wins the nomination in one state.
My thought too. If he's given the boot in New Hampshire as a Dem, maybe he'll be a shoe-in as the Libertarian party candidate.
Dem anti-Dons? That could explain how the LP convention was cancelled from Austin, then packed in the desert with girl-bullying ku-klux redcap MAGAts rewriting the platform into a smaller, angrier version of God's Own Prohibitionists. Maybe the plan is to draw off enough votes to make
Howard TaftDonnie Tramp lose to the Democratic mummy, then go back to the original LP platform.Reason used to be a libertarian publication. Matt Welch spends his time, though, obsessing about the horse races in the legacy parties and wasting time spinning meaningless articles such as this one, which is equivalent to "What would happen if a unicorn fell out of the sky?"
Matt, have you written even one article about the LP race for President?
https://reason.com/podcast/2024/01/18/matt-welch-whats-wrong-with-populism/
It would be Poetic Justice for Joe Biden to lose in New Hampshire.
Joe Biden is one of the very worst Presidents in the history of the USA and probably the most corrupt and guilty of influence peddling.
This aged well