The Beekeeper Is a Pulpy, Enjoyable Action Movie About a Rigged System
In Jason Statham's latest lowbrow actioner, the bee puns buzz all the way to the top.

You have to imagine that the pitch meeting for The Beekeeper went something like this.
"So, it's called The Beekeeper."
"The what?"
"The Beekeeper. And it's about a guy…"
"Who keeps bees. Right. Got that. From the title."
"Yeah, he keeps bees. But also — "
"Also?
"Also he kills people."
"Like…with bees?"
"Well, sort of. He hurts a few bad guys with jars of honey."
"So wait—he doesn't kill people with bees?"
"Not really. Mostly he just uses whatever is around. Guns. Trucks. Power tools. Gas cans. A computer keyboard. An elevator."
"So remind me. Why…is it called The Beekeeper?"
"Well, uh, he keeps bees."
"You said that."
"And there are a whole lot of bee puns."
"Oh. I get it. I totally get it now."
"Yeah?"
"What you're saying is…it's a…B movie!"
The main thing you need to know about The Beekeeper, which is playing in theaters now, is that it's a movie about a guy, played by Jason Statham, who keeps bees and kills people, mostly not with bees. If that description sounds appealing, then this modestly competent January action movie will probably be for you.
It's tempting to leave it at that, and say that's all you need to know. But both despite and because of its limitations, this movie has a bit more going on. It's not just that Statham's taciturn beekeeper elaborately kills a bunch of people—it's who he kills, and why. The Beekeeper isn't just a pulpy action movie about righteous, ridiculous vengeance, though it very much is that. It's a movie about the sense that the system—the economy, the government, whatever the word "system" means to you—is rigged by the powerful to protect their own at the expense of ordinary people.
The movie starts on a quiet farm, where beekeeper Adam Clay (Statham) spends his days quietly tending a hive and helping out Eloise, the older woman who owns the estate. But after Eloise is scammed out of her savings and a charity fund for children's education she manages, Clay takes action. Turns out Clay isn't just a beekeeper, he's the beekeeper, a former intelligence operative with a very special set of skills, i.e. he's very, very good at killing bad guys.
Clay goes after the phishing scammers who drained Eloise's bank account. But he doesn't stop with the local outfit. Instead, he pursues the operation all the way to the top. That means going after Derek Danforth (Josh Hutcherson), the smarmy, jerky, entitled 20-something who runs a network of scam operations. (The movie is at least in part about how young people are the worst.)
But Danforth has some powerful allies.
And this is where some spoilers are necessary.
See, it's not only that Danforth has a former CIA bigwig (played with glowering glee by Jeremy Irons) on staff to run security. The young twerp also happens to be the son of a powerful woman played by Jemma Redgrave—who turns out to be the President of the United States.
Clay isn't just trying to take down a lone scamming operation. He's fighting, like, the entire corrupt political-economic system, maaaaaaaaan.
So sure, The Beekeeper is a silly-but-enjoyable movie about a beekeeper who kills people. But it's also a movie about righteous vengeance against corrupt self-dealing elites.
That the movie resolves this way is not entirely surprising, considering the creative team behind it. From End of Watch to Fury to Suicide Squad, director David Ayer's filmography is littered with films that take a cynical view of official authorities. And screenwriter Kurt Wimmer has a long history of high-concept movies about corrupt governments, including the enjoyably junky sci-fi pictures Equilibrium and Aeon Flux.
The thematic undertones aren't exactly nuanced, which is fine, because The Beekeeper—thank goodness—is not a message movie. But it is a film that channels a pervasive sense of frustration, anger, and despair about the general state of early 2020s America into an amusing action yarn about some bad guys getting what's coming to them. And it turns out that the bad guys are just about everyone in power today.
The Beekeeper isn't a great movie. But in its self-aware simplicity, it is an enjoyable one. It's over the top. It's absurd. In its own way, it's bee-autiful.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It has Jason Statham in it. I will watch it, B-lieve me.
I get paid more than $120 to $130 every hour for working on the web. I found out about this activity 3 months prior and subsequent to joining this I have earned W effectively $15k from this without having internet working abilities Copy underneath site to..
Check It—>>> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
Well, Statham is of beekeeping age.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome9.com
Seriously, who doesn’t like good action shlock?
I caught an early screening last weekend.
If you go in looking for a Jason Statham movie, you'll walk out completely satisfied. There are multiple parts where the plot nearly goes completely off the rails at several points, and some completely bonkers scenes, but that's all part and parcel for a Statham movie.
Mrs Oblongata will definitely be watching, and I'll get the benefits.
I saw the movie last night - I enjoyed it.
I saw fight scenes that reminded me of the John Wick franchise.
I saw what felt like sort of homage to Being There with Peter Sellers when everything that came out of Jason Stratham had to do with bees, like Chance the Gardner who discussed things in terms of seasons and gardens.
I saw a "ripped from the headlines" plot line that involved a criminal son of the President.
I thought the beekeeper thing was just silly, but I did find myself laughing several times for various reasons.
Bottom line, like I've said about several recent movies, "it was OK, but I don't want to see it again." EVERY family member each said the same thing after watching Napoleon...
Thanks, I'll make a beeline to the theater to watch this.
It sounds sweet.
A movie about a guy called "The Beekeeper" that uses bees to murder people is something I might watch. This one, not so much.
I will formulate a stinging rebuttal of this review after combing over the facts.
Why, do have a bee under your bonnet, honey? Or did Your Queen (Spermy Daniels, in a glaze of Vaseline) and Her horney-honey-hiney reject your droning advances?
Another victim of hive mind thinking.
A Statham movie where Statham plays Statham?
*yawn*
But this time he plays a version of Statham who keeps bees and makes honey in between kicking asses by the dozen.
It's far from high-art, but it's a good execution of the movie they set out to make, and anyone who's in the mood to watch that kind of movie will get full value on their ticket price.
But is it theater worthy?
The effects are big enough that if you're looking for a "Jason Statham" movie, it's worth seeing it on a big screen with a good sound system. I saw it in a "XD" (IMAX type) theater, but with my Cinemark membership, the ticket only cost a few dollars net.
If you want a good movie with a solid story and a number of excellent performances, see "American Fiction"; that movie could wait for streaming/blu-ray but the more support it gets in theaters, the more likely some studio might be to make more like it.
In.
'So sure, The Beekeeper is a silly-but-enjoyable movie about a beekeeper who kills people. But it's also a movie about righteous vengeance against corrupt self-dealing elites.'
So, does the beekeeper wear a MAGA hat?
Semi-seriously, the fact that Hollywood produces (and profits from) these violent anti-establishment flicks must say something about their ethics, right?
I don't remember him wearing even a red hat of any kind.
The one thing that's unusual about this movie is that it was shot in 2022, meaining it was probably greenlit with Biden in office. Normally during Dem administrations, Hollywood portrays the President and other top officials as some kind of Rockstar/Warrior-Poet who's championing the cause of all that's good and pure in the world; they save the scripts where the President (or the President's son) is a principal villain for production and release during Republican administrations.
Making the son of POTUS the "big bad" in the era of Hunter Biden is especially outside the box for the current PTB in the movie biz.
These movies tend to be in the planning stages for about 4-5 years before they actually come out.
That the President, obligatory female one, has no idea that her kid is running million dollar scams is an obvious play on Biden's claim he knew nothing about Hunters schemes. That the movie got made is astonishing.
The idea that corrupt elites suck and it's awesome to see an action hero kill them is an idea that transcends political alignment.
Left and right both have tons of people who think the system is corrupt and needs to be changed, forcefully if necessary. If you listen to a woke activist talk, they have just as dim a view of the system as any MAGA activist. Where they differ is the details, how the system is bad, what strategies will fix it, who the system's main victims are, etc.
It's Ironic that the people who keep the authoritarians in power by voting for the coercive political paradigm condemn the results they keep supporting. To find the root cause of the inhumane politics they need only look in the mirror. Sovereign citizens don't look to be ruled, don't vote for rulers, e.g., law makers, LEOs, bureaucrats, and the tyranny of the courts. The "powers that be" are the masses who keep concentrating their power into the hands of an elite who exploit them. When will they act like mature, self-governing individuals?
Is there a lot of buzz about this?
People are swarming to the theater to see it.
Hive mind behavior.
We could wax more on this topic if we comb through the details.
I heard it has a sweet ending although the middle drones on for quite a bit.
It's a honey of a movie. Make sure to wear a yellow jacket.
Sherlock Holmes was a beekeeper
There was a time when movies were made to entertain.