The FAFSA 'Soft Launch' Was a Confusing, Glitchy Disaster
While the new version of the financial aid form was supposed to simplify the process, it has instead been riddled with technical problems and considerable delays.

On December 30, the Department of Education unveiled an updated, streamlined version of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) form, a college financial aid form required for students seeking federal grants and loans. However, the application's launch was riddled with issues, leading to widespread confusion and frustration among families and students who attempted to submit it.
In 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act required the Education Department to develop a simplified FAFSA form. The new form cuts down the number of questions from 108 to fewer than 50 and relies on information directly imported from the IRS to reduce the length of the questionnaire.
But the path to making a streamlined form available has been marred by delays. The FAFSA form typically becomes available in October each year, but in 2023 the form was not opened until December 30. The deadline for submitting the form remains the same, meaning students and their families have three months less to submit the document.
Making matters worse, the rollout of the form was riddled with technical difficulties, making it incredibly difficult, if not impossible, for many families to initially submit the form. The Education Department did a "soft launch" of the form—the application is only available "periodically" for an unspecified period of time so that the department can "monitor site performance and form functionality" before it officially opens. But for those who have accessed the form during this period, the technical issues have often been overwhelming.
The New York Times' Ron Lieber detailed these issues in a piece about his attempt to fill out the new FAFSA on the day of the form's launch. Lieber began attempting to access the form at 2 p.m., but the site didn't allow him to actually start filling it out until 8 p.m.
"Things were not always clear," Lieber wrote. "At one point, the site was telling me that both my daughter and I had already started forms when in fact neither of us had, at least as far as I could tell." He ultimately faced so many website issues that he was unable to complete the form despite multiple attempts.
Leiber isn't alone. According to Inside Higher Ed, as of January 2, over 400,000 applications had been started, but only 150,000 of these have been completed.
"Small numbers of applicants have been able to submit their FAFSAs, but [the Education Department] has taken the application down for long and unpredictable stretches of time to correct problems experienced by early users," the National College Attainment Network, a nonprofit that studies FAFSA, wrote in a statement on the day of the launch.
"Even by soft-launch standards, this weekend's rollout was challenging and students, families, and financial aid administrators who have been waiting for this release for months are understandably frustrated," added Justin Draeger, president of the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators, in a statement Tuesday.
While making FAFSA simpler and easier to understand is a welcome proposal that could make obtaining college aid less daunting for millions, the new form's bumpy rollout is hardly a vote for confidence in the new system. When applications like these get rushed, the technical issues could end up meaning that the most vulnerable students get left behind.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
FAFSA FAFO
Indeed. It's "business as usual."... poorlly executed, inefficient and over budget.
Emma is not old enough to recall the Obamacare rollout fiasco — it is not just the matter of a short timeframe, but how shoddy government efforts are.
Her parents aren't old enough to remember the Clinton single-payer fiasco headed up by Mrs. Clinton who wasn't even an elected official. Two for the price of one.
Was that actually a fiasco? It was basically non-stop commercials on TV from insurance and medical companies about how bad it was.
We have young professionals in our office that are not old enough to remember 9/11. I was in college (senior year).
One of them recently pointed out to me that my birthday is actually closer to Pearl Harbor than it is to today.
The only thing I remember from 2001 is Shrek. I was 4 years old.
One of them recently pointed out to me that my birthday is actually closer to Pearl Harbor than it is to today.
Punk kid probably couldn't pick a picture of the Challenger Disaster out of a lineup. You made sure they knew that the Berlin Wall wasn't built by the West Germans to keep the East Germans out, right?
Check out the FCC licensing website sometime for a prime example of governmental tech prowess. The agency who's once again pretending to be qualified to regulate the Internet since their board is now 3 Dems vs 2 Others.
If any private company had put up a site that poorly constructed as it "public face" in 1995 (when HTML as a language was still very rudimentary and only minimal interactivity was even remotely possible), their entire web development department would have been fired the following day and replaced with a half-dozen college interns.
Of course, when the Department of Education is eliminated, all this goes away.
+100000000000
Doubtful. This shit precedes the Department of Education by well over a decade.
I don't remember filling out a FAFSA at the book-store today.
I got a crazy idea: What if the federal government wasn't in the business of giving out student loans?
Yeah, but this mag does everything it can to distance itself from such alt-right insurrectiony thinking.
Well, if we did that, how would we pay for all of the colleges that have as many administrative staff as they do students?
Like a reason writer would be in favor of free minds and free markets? You AR kidding yourself
Needs more testing.
Can you imagine thinking it WASNT going to be a fiasco?
A 539 word article on the failed roll out of the new FAFSA website/form from a supposedly libertarian publication and not one mention that education, or funding of student aid, is found nowhere in Article I Section 8 of the Constitution of The United States's list of enumerated powers for the federal government?
Can I get my web-a-thon money back?
Fooled you once, shame on them. If they aren’t your tribe, don’t fund their reluctant liberteen-progressive omissions.
Like anyone in the comments contributes. Get real.
Somehow I remember this not being all that difficult when it was just paper forms that you turned into the financial aid office.
Mine was easy, I applied to about 50 scholarships (of thousands avaliable) , I managed to land 1. In the line for getting the scholarship check I was the only white male
There were 2 white chicks.
Even if the software is perfect (never happens) the powers that be almost always underestimate the hardware needed to handle the loads.
You'd think an article in a (supposedly) libertarian publication would make the point that the federal government shouldn't be providing financial aid to college students in the first place. But no.
Thanks!