Milei's New Anti-Protest Measures Are Put to the Test
Milei's critics have argued the government's measures are a "criminalization of the right to protest," but a closer look shows that those concerns are somewhat exaggerated.

One month after being elected president of Argentina, Javier Milei announced harsh measures against protesters last week, sparking fear among both critics and fans that he could lead a crackdown on civil society. Today, the new measures will be put to the test, as social and labor groups plan to protest Milei's new economic measures.
On December 14, Milei's Security Minister Patricia Bullrich announced a new security protocol to maintain public order during protests. The protocol allows federal security forces to use "the minimum necessary force" to clear people obstructing public streets and dismantle any sort of blockade.
"We are going to bring order to the country so that people can live in peace. The streets will not be taken," Bullrich said at a press conference. "Let them know that if the streets are taken, there will be consequences."
The authors, accomplices, and instigators of this type of crime will be identified with "video, digital, or manual means," Bullrich warned, adding that security agents can arrest and investigate "hooded" citizens attending the protests. Those caught blocking the streets will then be billed for the cost of the operation and could have their social welfare revoked, if they receive any.
Milei's critics have argued the government's measures are a "criminalization of the right to protest." They claim the government could use these powers to crack down on dissent, freedom of expression, and civil society at large.
On Tuesday, labor, social, and human rights groups signed a petition asking the United Nations and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to intercede and annul the protocol, claiming that such measures were against the Argentinian Constitution. Opposition legislators have presented a similar claim to the national courts.
But a closer look at the measures shows that these concerns are somewhat exaggerated. The measures are not aimed at preventing protests. Instead, they mean to prevent blockades, commonly known as piquetes in Argentina, which usually block streets for hours and can sometimes have drastic economic consequences. Bullrich made it clear in following statements that the right to protest will always be guaranteed in Argentina.
"Protesting is a right, but so is the right of people to move freely through Argentine territory to go to their workplace," explained Sandra Pettovello, head of the new Human Capital Ministry, on Monday.
Also, most Argentines seem to agree with the new measures. A recent poll by the University of Buenos Aires' Observatory of Applied Social Psychology found that 65 percent of those surveyed agree with stopping the blockades.
Faced with soaring inflation, rapidly rising poverty, and debt, Milei promised to shock the country's economy to end its crisis. Among his first measures, his administration devalued the currency by more than 50 percent, cut the number of government ministries by half, and announced widespread spending cuts.
But Milei's critics believe his actions will only make the country worse off. Protesters were called to march against the government's reforms in Buenos Aires on December 20—a date coinciding with the 22nd anniversary of the anti-government protests that left 39 dead.
Today's protests will put Milei's crackdown measures to the test. So far, Milei's administration has signaled that the protests can continue as planned "without the demonstrators being able to cut traffic and with the order of the City Government." But a large number of police officers can already be seen lurking in the background. Only time will tell if the measures will lead the libertarian president in a very un-libertarian direction.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Blocking streets is not protesting. It is insurrection.
Better he should have instituted a $500.00 reward for running over anyone blocking a public road.
(plus the cost of repairs for the vehicle)
This. "Blocking roads" and "protest" are not synonymous.
Blocking roads is actually counterproductive to protest because it both pisses people off and prevents them from seeing your message.
Burma Shave ads would have been a lot less successful if the first sign was smack in the middle of the road and nobody got to see the rest of it.
Now I have to congratulate you for that analogy, since I implied you were not yet 10 years old in the public urination post.
Eh, only sarc is perfect, and I ain't sarc.
Thank goodness there's only one of him.
Now I have to congratulate you for that analogy, since I implied you were not yet 10 years old in the public urination post.
Not to slight Warlock exactly but, I'm pretty sure my kids know what Burma Shave sign/advertising is and I can remember a time when I was their age and too young to possibly know or have seen what a Burma Shave ad/sign was.
OK, but do you know why Burma Shave has that name? I don't, but I'll hazard a guess that Burma had lots of coconuts whose oil would've been used in the making.
Darn, according to https://www.mnopedia.org/thing/burma-shave , the company's liniment did use ingredients from Burma, but it wasn't coconut or palm oil.
"Don't lose your head to save a minute ... you need your head, your brains are in it! Burma Shave ..."
There are still a few preserved signs out there, as well as some recreations. There some Mail Pouch Tobacco barns around too.
True, not everyone can be "The One True Libertarian"(TM).
Blocking streets is not protesting. It is insurrection.
I thought insurrection was when a bunch of people mostly just mill around aimlessly inside a government building they erroneously believed they were being allowed into because someone, for some reason, removed the barriers blocking the entrance.
Nope. That ain't insurrection. Not even close.
Said no one, ever.
I think you're thinking of abortion.
From my experience, people in Buenos Aires don't often bother repairing their cars.
They have more car accidents per capita than any other country in the Western Hemisphere. I experienced my first one on the drive home from the airport. On the highway. No one even slowed down.
It's like rally racing. The road markings are considered decorative, and are generally only found on federal highways and in larger cities. In the capitol, vehicles are often lined up 7 across at stop light for a 4 lane road, (lane, line, lane, line, etc) and the stop lights flash yellow before turning green, like it's an NHRA event.
Sounds like Chicago. Every car is scratched and dented.
I swear the locals like to use them for playing bumper cars.
This meets my memories of driving in Chicago.
There was one time I was there, trying to make a left turn, in a tractor trailer, so I could make a pickup. In the rain.
And the only reason I got the opportunity to make that left was because someone in the left hand lane coming from my right decided to make a right turn at the intersection, and creamed the car that was actually in the right lane there, and they both ended up plowing into both lanes of traffic that was oncoming to me and waiting for the light to change.
Since they were all tied up, I got to turn.
I really wish I'd had a dashcam for that. It was amazing. Not in a good way, but I was definitely amazed.
Basically like driving in Chicago except that they at least stop for red lights in Buenos Aires.
Only when perpendicular traffic is blocking the way forward.
Better than simply criminalizing unwanted protests, any government could ensure that protesters have a safe organized place to do so and that their concerns are actually recognized and addressed by both government and media.
Protests get nasty when concerns go unaddressed and the shock factor is the ONLY way to get media attention.
Imagine that, politically uncomfortable concerns actually being addressed immediately by the elected government.
It sure is easier to arrest and imprison people for insurrection.
Blocking roads is not part of a right to protest. A principle of free speech does not include a right to detain other people from going about their business.
https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1737550639851282469?t=FZ82GgmV6XFikh2DRUQndQ&s=19
Even liberalism's most ardent supporters are preparing for its imminent failure
We are in a post-liberal society and everyone is scrambling for control of what that means
Just this once conservatives should avoid dying on the hill their enemies have already abandoned
[Link]
Just this once conservatives should avoid dying on the hill their enemies have already abandoned
I didn't see this line in the Tweet but it's excellent.
One thing to keep in mind is that a lot of the reason these neo-Maoists have gained the power they have is because conservatives simply stopped resisting their advances. People don't realize how vulnerable these commissars and institutions are to simply being told "no" over and over and over, because they rely on your voluntary participation to succeed.
Look at the pandemic. They succeeded in getting mask mandates through where they weren't even needed or had long been shown to be largely ineffective, so they moved on to vaccine passports and trying to force everyone to get a COVID shot. That ended up being a bridge too far, and while the vast majority of people in the US still got the shot, all it took was for a mere 17% of the population to refuse getting it that ultimately killed that effort stone dead in this country. Note that the WHO is trying to get the tyrannical EU model implemented worldwide, so this isn't over by a long shot, but it does show that telling this people no over and over again is ultimately their kryptonite.
But that's the key--you HAVE to be more stubborn than they are, because when they don't initially get their way, they get pissed and organized to try and make you obey them. Look how Biden tarded out against Americans who didn't get the shot as an example. But if you push back long enough, they start looking like assholes to more moderate people and have to stop.
Funny how we get this hair-splitting nuance and "cose examinations" of protests when it is a "Libertarian" leader whose policies are at question.
When the Federal Government was arresting people trying to burn down federal courthouses in portland, we did not get nearly this much nuance. Nor did they question the right of protestors to block traffic during the protest in Austin that resulted in an embarrassing hagiography for the guy shot in that protest.
This is what happens when you are about principals not principles.
When the Federal Government was arresting people trying to burn down federal courthouses in portland,
Innocent people were being kidnapped!
White Vans!!!
Secret police!!!1!
Were not those who attacked the courthouse insurrectioniusts?
Would not spreading these conspiracy theories constitute aid and comfort to insurrectionists?
White Van
In the pick-up lane
On a winter day
In the rain
And they don't bring up Ashli Babbitt whenever police behave badly. That's proof that they support premeditated murder as long as the victim is a Republican.
OK, Sarc, so was her killing justified?
They got medals didnt they?
What the? I can’t.. Huh?
You’ve got so retarded you’ve become a caricature of yourself.
That's certainly a take.
Is it as retarded as everything else that comes from his keyboard?
Disagree. See Nancy Rommelman excellent reporting from Portland. I think J.D. wrote at least one article about the feds arresting of hooligans in Portland, but his take IIFC was not that they shouldn't be arrested, just that it wasn't a federal jurisdictional matter. I some what disagree with JD because it was a federal courthouse under seige, but I also agree that federal police powers shouldn't just be expanded.
..those concerns are somewhat exaggerated
As usual.
I wonder what the difference is between "somewhat exaggerated" and "flat out false?"
Depends on the skin colors of the parties.
How'd I miss this?
I guess this is where Nike discovered that progressive looters don't buy sneakers too.
Yeah, that would be something, looters noticing they grabbed a box of Nikes and leaving a few bucks on the counter.
But I read in the LA Times the other day that companies were just making the shoplifting surge up, and were closing stores because they don't actually like making money.
I guess Portland will now be decried as a "sneaker desert".
It's going to be an everything desert if the nihilists get their way.
I saw that retarded screed too. Gave me a good chuckle and an eyeroll.
Meanwhile, in Flyover Country, I can walk into just about any retailer and grab what I want off the shelf without having to call for assistance to unlock a cage of any sort.
Of course, around here, we also typically pay for what we plan to take home with us.
Except for that annoying location near the south end of Lake Michigan, 300 miles from you. There, even Walgreens locks up the toothpaste in the South Loop.
Yep. Even ammo and reloading supplies are on open shelves.
Wait what, you can get reloading supplies. Still can't get primers, or brass. Projectiles are back and some powder. But you kind of need it all.
Just put the powder and the projectiles in a piece of bamboo like Captain Kirk.
I guess this is where Nike discovered that progressive looters don’t buy sneakers too.
You've got to make sure you stick your tongue out when performing a slam dunk like that.
Funny thing. I never read about work boots getting stolen.
i have literally heard shitlibs shrug and brush it off. "its just property crime"
The Detroit area has seen a string of police pursuits ending badly, and there's a massive shitlib response to the tune of "that's why police shouldn't chase people". You see, it's the fault of police that criminals kill people with their high-speed, out-of-control vehicles.
The system will fight back. See 1989 in eastern Europe or yesterday in CO.
I don't think 1989 in eastern Europe really applies. I remember those communist governments collapsing in pretty short order once the wall came down, and with not a lot of resistance. Ceaucescu and his wife were domed on Christmas day, if I recall correctly.
Colorado, though? Abso-fucking-lutely.
Look at the weeks prior in România , the DDR and the CCCP. The Securitate was kidnapping and murdering people in Timișoara. The army eventually sided with the people. After Ceaușescu was captured, tried and sentenced then it calmed down.
Ceaucescu and his wife were domed on Christmas day, if I recall correctly.
The Trump of Romania.
Yeah, I'm as shocked as anyone else that communists are once again marrying a truth to a lie.
This comment feels like it is best spoken in a monotone voice while eating an apple.
Like when? Give me an example.
So much for being a libertarian. That lasted what... ten days?
So, keeping the streets clear for commerce isn't libertarian?
Apparently Anustasia doesn't see blocking the streets as aggression.
Clearing out people protesting that the government sugar train is drying up doesn’t seem very anti-libertarian. Or is that just me?
Only in Libertopia does the issue not arise.
In the real world, Milei could have divvied up those two ministries - Security and Defense - differently.
His VP and others in his coalition are apologists for the military dictatorship era in Argentina.
Bullrich and the Defense Minister are part of a different coalition. At core democratic but not libertarian. I suspect they demanded those two portfolios as part of their deal to support Milei because the alternative could have been much worse.
Good.
Just two hours later, you prove my point. Thanks.
Almost as long as the Reason morning meeting.
Interfering with people’s ability to move about freely is a violation of the NAP you stupid leftist.
Was a pretty quick turn from:
"The state is the enemy!"
to:
"We will bring order to the country!"
I presume the peace and order he speaks of (ok, Darth Vader) are to be brought via non-state methods then???
As from the beginning, my hope remains high but my faith is lacking.
Who do you think you're fooling? He slashed the government in half and is striving to protect the populace from the massive legion of parasites shedding from the corpse.
If someone protests and their social welfare gets cut off, whether they die for lack of income or get a private job supporting themselves, non-state methods will be the resolution.
"Libertarian" is not synonymous with "anarchist".
Recognizing that lefties tard-rage to try and provoke a reaction and working to mitigate that is hardly unlibertarian. So is preserving social stability, the opposite of which radical leftism thrives in.
'"Protesting is a right, but so is the right of people to move freely through Argentine territory to go to their workplace," explained Sandra Pettovello, head of the new Human Capital Ministry, on Monday.'
Nuh-uh. Protesting AND blocking streets is the right of anyone who claims the mantle of righteous progressive. Those vermin who deny progressive wisdom have no rights.
He's also pulling all the woke/gender/inclusivity garbage out of the schools and military. Straight up banned.
He's already on record saying, "You can't give shit leftards an inch." Looks like he's following through on some of that.
I will reserve judgement until we get accurate reports of what happens.