Exclusive: Rand Paul Wants To Kill Electric Car Subsidies and Mandatory A.M. Radio
The senator has introduced an amendment to the AM For Every Vehicle Act, sponsored by Sens. Ed Markey and Ted Cruz.

Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) is trying to stop legislation that requires automakers to continue putting dashboard A.M. radio in cars. His new amendment to the A.M. radio bill would also eliminate electric vehicle subsidies.
Earlier this year, Sen. Ed Markey (D–Mass.) introduced the AM For Every Vehicle Act, with the explicit goal of ensuring "that this resilient and popular communication tool does not become a relic of the past." A skeptic might respond that if A.M. radio is both resilient and popular, car manufacturers would continue to provide it—but eight of the 20 major automobile companies have ceased offering the service, according to Markey's own press release. The market currently provides some cars that have A.M. radio and others that do not; yet a bipartisan group of lawmakers, including Sen. Ted Cruz (R–Texas) believe that the federal government must mandate it.
Enter Paul. On Tuesday, the senator introduced an amendment that would obviate the AM For Every Vehicle Act while also eliminating the electric vehicle tax credit.
"Mandating that all cars have AM radio is antithetical to any notion of limited government," said Paul on the floor of the U.S. Senate.
Supporters of the AM For Every Vehicle Act contend that the service is necessary for public safety in that it communicates information about driving conditions and extreme weather. Of course, there are many, many other ways for drivers to get that information, including from any passenger's cellphone. There's nothing stopping automobile manufacturers from equipping cars with A.M. radio, but federal legislators who support the bill are effectively saying that they know better.
Cruz sparred with Paul over his amendment, asserting that the AM for Every Vehicle Act was really about protecting free speech. Paul disagreed strenuously.
"The debate over free speech, as listed in the First Amendment, is that government shall pass no law," said Paul. "It has nothing to do with forcing your manufacturer to have AM radio. This legislation attempts to insert Congress's judgment into a question best decided by American consumers."
Watch Paul's full remarks here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Cruz sparred with Paul over his amendment, asserting that the AM for Every Vehicle Act was really about protecting free speech.
Yeah, that's a fucking stretch.
Just another reminder that the conservatives are just as happy to pass stupid laws that make things cost more as liberals.
I don't think it's at the same level as the Dems, but, yes, there are many Republicans that may praise the free market while trying to implement anti-free market legislation.
Democrats would love for people not to have AM radio, as it is still a popular delivery system for conservative speech. Which is Cruz’s point.
When you’re up against a bunch of Marxist pit viper like the democrats, you have to play a little dirty to fight back sometimes.
We had to destroy liberty in order to save it.
Yeah, I’m not super comfortable with this, but given who is pushing the Eli I aitonof AM radio and why, I understand why there is pushback.
It’s the democrats wanting to eliminate conservative talk radio. Not a function of market demand.
There are an assortment of devices on the market that allow older cars to use CD players and other modern entertainment technologies by converting their audio to a low power FM signal. If AM is so beloved why not such a device for AM radio? Let the market solve the problem.
Then let those people buy cars with AM radios if they want, or buy a standalone AM radio. Doesn't need to be mandated.
Read what I wrote above. AM radio isn’t going away due to market forces.
I prefer FM as a transmission mechanism. I see no reason why conservative talk radio would not thrive on FM.
AM radio signals cover multiple states. I used to listen to KGO out of San Francisco from the mountains of New Mexico. FM radio is basically line of sight.
That being said, there is no good argument for requiring AM radios in cars. You can buy a car with an AM radio if you want, or buy a stand alone AM radio or listen online.
These is an AM station in Denver that can be heard at night in Ohio.
As a young lad in Northern Michigan I used to listen to WLS in Chicago. Dick Diondi.
Am radio transmission travels farther than FM but is subjected to more interference and terrain .
It's because Am means amplitude modulation which means the amplitude of the carrier wave is proportional to the amplitude of the signal being modulated.
It's strong with line of sight but drive next to a hill or underpass and hear the difference.
Went through all this in electronics classes.
For 230+ years the authoritarian’s constitution has proven to be a mistake for the citizen, yet the citizens allow their exploitation. Why? The solution to the initiation of deadly force, threats (the world’s political paradigm), is non-violent, organized cooperation which would require reason, support rights, choice.
It’s either reason or violence! Reason is constructive. Violence is not.
Rand Paul is a conservative you know that right?
Sure he is. He does what successful Libertarians do, puts on the conservative republican skin so he can win elections and make stands like this one.
He's still a member of the Republican Party so he has to play their games or risk expulsion. But he's a libertarian like his father.
Dr. Paul killed the radio car,
Dr. Paul killed the radio car,
In your mind but not your car,
We can't rewind we've gone too far.....
It’s a free speech issue because the only conservative radio stations are on a.m.
Since the liberals have taken over all the other elements of mass communication AM radio is the only one where conservatives can be heard.
Sen. Paul is so selectively libertarian it's infuriating.
Which senator is more libertarian?
The one who wants to repeal the Affordable Care act and doesn't have a replacement for it.
The Affordable Care Act eliminated competition. Getting rid of the act would allow a wider range of insurance including cost sharing. This was outlawed by the ACA but a few cost sharing operations were grandfathered in. They are primarily Christian organizations.
The replacement is the market freed from constraints, but no one, not even Rand Paul has the guts to push that.
Considering all the mail that arrives every year in November and the first week of December, promoting one health plan or another, there seems to be a lot of competition in the market for these plans. Maybe the parties competing aren't the parties that really should be competing, but strong competition certainly exists.
That ain’t competition.
If every restaurant was Taco Bell, say, and you could choose from a hundred places that made some variety of taco, you might define that as “competition.” Yes, I have a hundred choices.
But healthy competition allows someone to come in and innovate, maybe make a burger. Or a cobb salad. Or Thai food, or Sushi. Or any sort of meal I might find more appealing for myself. Including no restaurant meal if I so chose.
ACA mandated the system that was fundamentally expensive, bureaucratic, and bloated be the only health care you can buy. That you HAVE to buy. For example, I can’t choose a plan that doesn’t cover female birth control, even though I’m a middle aged male who can, literally, never use it. So I can buy from a score of different plans, all that offer female reproductive benefits and a raft of over things that make them more expensive, but I can’t go get a cheaper plan that just offers me the benefits I, personally, am interested in buying. Nor can companies offer innovative alternatives that aren’t like insurance.
Modern health insurance, work provided, is a byproduct of government fucking with the tax code so companies can pay with pre-taxed dollars. The whole industry was codified by the ACA as the final fuck you in the whole “fixing” the problems that the government created by their perverse incentives in the first place.
Real competition is that I get 23 *different* choices of way to provide for my own health care. Including some innovation that is better and cheaper than the ACA mandated health insurance plans, but that is not allowed today because of Obamacare.
Look at what the uniparty machine and their collaborators do to anyone who tries. Like Trump and all these phony prosecutions.
I was told, "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor." I don't remember who that was...
At work our health insurance premium extra was cut because of it.
Government subsidized medicine is not working.
You oughta read Reason Magazine.
Nobody reads that.
Opposing mandates is pretty much the definition of libertarian.
Libertarian is following mandates before they become mandates so there doesn’t need to be mandates.
One reason to kill AM car radio is because of interference from the electric motors of some vehicles. There are manufacturers too cheap or lazy to properly shield their products. So the public suffers a loss.
I like my AM radio in my car, but I don't like them being mandated. I'd just like to have the option. It seems like a lot of cars these days are designed in such a way that it would be nearly impossible to install an after-market radio (like we did as teenagers) with that option if the base model didn't have one.
On the other hand, I'm much more concerned about the electric vehicle mandates or the remote interlock device mandates, and etc, that are more dangerous to personal liberty, than a mandate that vehicle manufacturers include an optional feature that I might not care about, but can also choose not to use (even if I can't choose not to pay for it).
In a few years you’re going to a mandatory breathalyzer in your car.
Fun huh?
That blows.
But hopefully we'll be able to choose a tariff-free one built in China in a wide variety of colors!
And "safe" driving technology.
And that's just for starters.
Guess I'll have to find a guy who knows how to disable that bs. I'll join forces with the farmers trying to reclaim their tractors from all the DRM loaded on em these days.
And the mandated social enforcement, which mean what you say on social media or in public could have a certain impact as to how you will be transported to market to get your weekly ration of bugs.
In other words shut up and you can drive your car.
You could end up like Michael Hastings.
Aside from union labor mandated add ons are likely the main reason cars cost so damn much.
It seems like a lot of cars these days are designed in such a way that it would be nearly impossible to install an after-market radio (like we did as teenagers) with that option if the base model didn’t have one.
These days, an AM/FM HF/VHF/UHF receiver can fit in the same pocket as the five bees you got for a quarter, Grandpa. Also, everybody mounts cell phones and satellite devices to the dashboard, windshield, or other surface with plastic arms and removable adhesive.
To paraphrase Dr. Malcom. The market, be it ever so hampered, uh, finds a way.
You won't have to have an AM radio in your mandated electric vehicle.
What will I be able to choose on my indoor ducts?
Instead, enlightened democrats, who are almost extraterritorial, will decide what you hav win your car. Of course those same enlightened democrats will ensure a thinly the privileged elites have cars in the first place.
"Central Services!"
Of course, there are many, many other ways for drivers to get that information, including from any passenger's cellphone.
Someone needs to get out of DC.
I mean, you REALLY need to get out of DC... like, desperately.
Like the entire staff of Reason.
They deserve DC.
That's the thing - I can get Clear-Channel AM radio from St. Louis or Chicago, Dallas or Denver, in the middle of Kansas, but I might not get a cell signal.
I have podcasts downloaded because my commute runs through a few deadzones for both cell and radio signal. I would assume there are AM radio receivers that can plug into a usb port or something. I know I had a bluetooth receiver that also could play FM through my aux port.
Less convenient, but there is a way.
mad.casual linked to some available on amazon above.
Don't forget that many States are making it illegal for a driver to have an active cell phone while driving.
I wish that Soave would pay as much attention to the Democrats as he does in trying to ridicule Republicans.
but I might not get a cell signal.
Fortunately no legislation has been introduced that forbids automobile manufacturers from selling you an AM radio.
Yet.
I can't even remember the last time I tuned into AM radio. And never for emergency information or traffic.
AM Radio is pretty much a rural thing nowadays. Even there it almost gone.
Bill Gates owns all the land anyway.
Unless you like sports talk. Or news talk. Or NPR (eww.) All the big cities have a few AM talk radio stations still. And a lot of mariachi music channels.
In my neck of the woods it's Tejano. Regardless, the listenership is way way down from a two or three decades ago. Do we really need Federal Laws to mandate it?
Also, most NPR is on both AM and FM now. Say what you want about Schweddy Balls, Car Talk is awesome!
AM radio hasn’t gone anywhere. Except where leftist run conglomerates have bought up the stations and dropped conservative talk. Not for financial reasons, but to eliminate non Marxist speech.
Obligatory argument for mandatory AM radio.
When the power was off for a whole week here after Hurricane Ike, listened to AM radio all day. I was glad they were there.
No reason why it would have to be AM though. NOAA's going out over VHF regardless of whether there are radios in cars to receive it or not (or at least until there's some sort of Protestant Reformation within the climate religion and somebody shuts it down because of all the weather blasphemy or something).
I bet there’s an app for that.
Not that it would be much help during something like the aftermath of a hurricane, to be fair.
Was that AM radio in your car or from a tabletop radio?
My portable AM radio with the solar panel and the dynamo crank.
You sat in your car the whole day? With your D.C. mandated AM radio? Gosh.
I listen to Dan Bongino now and then. Used to listen to Paul Harvey and Rush.
Loved watching the liberals go insane.
Because every car needs to have Rush Limbaugh on it! For grate Justiss!
Jesus, he’s been dead for years and he still lives in your head.
Loud uncouth opinions really traumatized poor Brandy.
Yep, he still can't stand mean tweets, the fucking TDS-addled shit.
I think it's fair to say that the sentiment is exactly why Cruz is supporting the mandate. My question is whether it's due to broadcaster's influence, a desire for conservative advocacy, or simply an acknowledgement of rural usefulness for AM.
Just to let Brandybuck know, Bongino is kind of Rush's heir since he was given that time slot.
I used to listen to Rush daily. I understood his style of humor to get his viewpoint across. Illustrate absurdity with the absurd. But then he beclowned himself way too many times.
Still a million times more dignified than the most dignified far leftist radio host.
Dammit, Rico, get a haircut. You're starting to look like George Will.
Paul is right on both issues. The feds should not mandate either AM radios (by force) or auto subsidies (by indirect force - letting you have some of your money back if you do as your told)
....or mandate.................uh..............anything!
They should also mandate the radios run on tube technology to support the electronic tube industry.
As long as there are rock guitarists, there will be a tube industry.
Rock on!
Knew a Mennonite that had to pay extra to buy a new truck without a sound system.
God would have been mad if he had just pulled the fuse?
I don't have a problem with AM being preserved. Over the years - including recent ones - I've listened to everything from baseball games to live political debates to talk radio.
FM never carries that sort of thing.
But it can. All the major sports have moved to an FM station in the Detroit area. Talk Radio can, too.
If I recall AM has greater range and less cost to get into. It makes it popular for small, local stations.
If they actually cut all AM from vehicles I've no doubt someone will, or already has, invented an AM receiver that will plug into what we called a cigarette lighter and will somehow interface with the cars sound system.
Yep, those exist. They can also plug into the USB aux interface.
Yes, AM has vastly greater range than FM, and is not subject to the same infrastructure vulnerabilities as cellular communication. I used to live in upstate NY, and I could actually get Chicago AM stations at night. Every cell tower and FM radio station in NY state could be destroyed by zombies and you'd be able to hear that Chicago was still zombie-free via AM radio.
This may actually be what Markey means by "resilient": it's a much more technologically robust way to communicate over long distances than FM or cellular. IMO, that doesn't justify mandating it in every car, but it *is* exactly the kind of thing that markets don't provide so well, mainly because people often don't value that kind of resilience until it's too late. People don't want to pay for an AM radio that they'll only need in a zombie apocalypse, even though, if a zombie apocalypse came, they might really, really wish they had.
I've got a pocket sized AM/FM radio that runs on a pair of AA batteries. In a zombie apocalypse I'd more likely hook it up to an earpiece and listen to AM that way than run my car and sit in it to listen.
AM will never die, it just will need to evolve.
There is no incentive for companies to maintain AM radio stations if the only use is people pulling out their pocket radios during the zombie apocalypse.
This may actually be what Markey means by “resilient”: it’s a much more technologically robust way to communicate over long distances than FM or cellular. IMO, that doesn’t justify mandating it in every car, but it *is* exactly the kind of thing that markets don’t provide so well, mainly because people often don’t value that kind of resilience until it’s too late.
Sigh. The EM event that knocks out FM, Cellular, and other relay channels in any given region won’t leave AM intact… if it leaves you in a situation to sit around and listen to AM radio… assuming the broadcasts are important enough to be sent to you or you’re important enough to be broadcast to. I know a lot has happened since the days of Marconi, but we’ve learned a thing or two about networks, nodes, and redundancy since then.
13 orders of magnitude of radio frequencies of which AM consumes ~1. Unless the zombies are going to break down the door of the local AM station (but not the FM ones because... uh... [Insert George Romero plot device]), take Casey Kasem’s Top 40 off the air, and start broadcasting how to kill them all using common items you can find in the trunk of your car or under your kitchen sink… any *broad**casts*… are going to be pretty “Stay in your homes. Lock your doors. Drink bottled water.”
That's easy. You deal with the zombie apocalypse by letting the bears out of your trunk to kill the zombies. Bears are naturally immune to zombieism.
IMO, that doesn’t justify mandating it in every car, but it *is* exactly the kind of thing that markets don’t provide so well,
There is no market in public safety and disaster preparedness because the government has monopolized it. If there were a market, then the market would come up with good solutions.
Most of the "government needs to intervene because" "markets don't solve this" or "externalities" type arguments come down to trying to address problems created by government in the first place.
There is no market in public safety and disaster preparedness because the government has monopolized it. If there were a market, then the market would come up with good solutions.
A bit of 6 vs. half-dozen. There is a market that no one can monopolize even if the monopoly only exists inside the heads of morons who see the inside of their own head as a shortcoming of the market.
AM radios in cars is not any sort of public safety/disaster preparedness plan. If we knew the hurricane were going to top the levy and bodies piling sandbags would completely prevent it, or a million-man bucket brigade would stop a wildfire from burning from Fairfax to Redwood City, sending out notice only over AM to the remote receivers and receivers largely in cars, as opposed to co-opting the Amber Alert System or the National Weather Service system, would be retarded.
AM radios are dead simple to construct and maintain, are purely analog, and they have a large range. That makes them useful for certain kinds of widespread disasters: coronal mass ejection, large scale volcanic eruption, nuclear attack, EMP attack, etc.
Obviously, you don't need them for typical "disasters" (i.e. predictable weather events that the state and federal government should stay out of in the first place).
I live in Northern Michigan. when I was a lad there was a local USAF RADAR station to the north about thirty miles. If you drove past it or even near it, the radio would buzz when the beam hit it. So you would get a burrzzzt,....burzt....burzt....kinda funny.
Then buy a car that offers AM radio or install a head unit that has AM radio. You don't get to force your preferences on everyone else with government guns.
... I didn't say anything about forcing anything on anyone. What are you talking about?
"I don’t have a problem with AM being preserved."
I don't either, but I resent lefty shit piles mandating it, lefty shit pile.
Fuck off and die.
I don’t have a problem with AM being preserved.
Nobody “has a problem with AM being preserved”. What libertarians have a problem with is the government mandating the inclusion of AM radios in cars because it violates libertarian principles.
It’s a valid libertarian concern, albeit picayune. It illustrates the ability of libertarians not to see the forest because they are autistically obsessed with the tiny seedling that they just crushed under their bare, calloused, dirty feet.
Nobody “has a problem with AM being preserved”.
I don't know dude. Reading some of the mouthbreathing on this page, it sounds like they want to kill it just out of spite for the legislation at this point.
Dooooooooood, you are both a steaming pile of lefty shit and an ignoramus besides, dooooooooood.
Fuck off and die,
Thank you for illustrating the mouthbreathing.
December 3rd, a day that will live in Corporate infamy.
Summary: Trump is literally worse than Hitler, the media has ultimately concluded.
Yeah the Trump the dictator talking point has been pretty deafening. Meanwhile the Bidenomics talking point has gone silent. They are desperately searching for a message that resonates outside of their bubble but they always end up just talking to each other.
Watching clingers demand government-required AM radios in vehicles is great sport.
Carry on, downscale, backwater, obsolete slack-jaws.
They let you out of the drunk tank already?
You know what else is great sport? Reminding everyone of this legendary faceplant:
I wouldn’t mind seeing Judge Barrett confirmed, if only because I believe it would precipitate the installation of four new, better justices during the first half of 2021.
Have you decided which gutpunch made you look more ridiculous?
Was it when Roe got overturned by a SC you said would be 7 - 6 liberal?
Or was it when race-based college admissions got gutted by a SC you said would be 7 - 6 liberal?
So Sen. Ed Markey (D–Mass.), is a downscale, backwater, obsolete slack-jaw clinger?
Once you've read more than a handful of Art's posts you'll realize he's either too stupid or too lazy to make his gimmick work. Just completely unable to maintain any sense of internal consistency with his stock insults.
"Downscale" is an especially meaningless one coming from him. Go on, ask him what he thinks of Elon Musk, the richest human on the planet. Then ask him what he thinks about the millions of deadbeats who voted for Biden hoping he'd change their lives with a one-time $10K handout. 🙂
Perhaps there is an art to those unexceptional takes.
Once you’ve read more than a handful of Art’s posts you’ll realize he’s either too stupid or too lazy to make his gimmick work. Just completely unable to maintain any sense of internal consistency with his stock insults.
RAK proves illustrates how Insufficiently advanced sarcasm is indistinguishable from stupidity.
Who are you addressing here, asshole? Pretty much everyone is against the mandate.
Fuck off and die, asshole bigot.
Rand Paul for 2024!!! Oh whoops. He might do mostly the same thing as Trump did and De-Regulate the Nazi-Empire ... heaven-forbid./s
What he really needs to do is to stop the mandate for "impaired driving" detection that can disable the vehicle.
Ridiculous technology mandate that will add significant expense to, literally, every single car sold as you cannot NOT buy it. Way more expensive and intrusive than an AM radio.
I know the argument, if you're not doing anything wrong. But I'm not doing anything wrong and, even so, I'll have to pay a bunch more money for the next car I buy so these fuckheads can virtue signal.
One thing at a time. Kill the AM bill, then work on the other federal mandates. The federal beast must be killed by the pecking of a thousand... what are those earth creatures with webbed feet, and bills... um... cats! Yes, the federal beast must be pecked to death by a thousand cats.
"What he really needs to do is to stop the mandate for “impaired driving” detection that can disable the vehicle."
Yes.
False positives from these sorts of 'safety systems' never happen, do they?
The problem with relying on phones for emergency information is the networks can get overloaded. I work near a theme park, on busy days, my phone is basically useless
Radio is how you can communicate with a whole region. Especially AM which can travel 1000 miles.
While it's perhaps unlikely, for people fleeing a region, communication via AM radio could be very important.
Radio is how you can communicate with a whole region. Especially AM which can travel 1000 miles.
AM radio, especially when talking about car receivers, is how you communicate *to* a whole region, not *with*.
And there is no calamity up to and including the Earth cracking completely in half where AM is likely and certainly not guaranteed to outperform other established radio, satellite, and other networks. Anything that blots out FM, cellular, etc. for a 500 mi. is virtually guaranteed to block out AM within the same radius, unless, like my zombie scenario above, whatever malevolent cause does such a thing whimsically decides to allow people to listen to the Farm Report or the Cubs on WGN while continuing to subject them to its EM malevolence otherwise.
This feels a lot like Ron Bailey’s fears about someone getting bitten by a monkey infected with Hemorrhagic West Nile Polio AIDS Fever in the wilds of Borneo and 75% of humanity being dead within 3 mos. of the first bite. It’s not just not realistic, it defies natural laws and requires normal humans to behave in distinctly misanthropic ways (which they do entirely without Hemorrhagic West Nile Polio AIDS Fever). And I’d say something in between could be interesting but nobody has read that book or seen that movie.
Exclusive: Rand Paul Wants To Kill Electric Car Subsidies and Mandatory A.M. Radio
One of these matters more than the other.
But both are distractions from what actually matters.
The Founding Fathers envisioned a government of citizen legislators who would serve for a few years and return home, not a government run by a small group of special interests and lifelong, permanently entrenched politicians who prey upon the brokenness of Washington to govern in a manner that is totally unaccountable to the American people.
- Ted Cruz
Maybe Ted, you could practice what you preach. And just fuck Sen. Ed Markey.
Amazing how ones perspective changes when they become one of the lifelong entrenched politicians.
Maybe Ted, you could practice what you preach.
The way the system operates, politicians need to stay in it for a long time to get anything done. If people choose to go home early, their side will lose.
It's like Social Security: I oppose it, but I'm forced to pay into it, so I'm taking money out. Or like drug-related and gun-related prohibitions: I oppose them, but I obey them.
Want to pass some big government legislation as a Republican? Just say it's for national defense or free speech.
Increasingly during the past decade, SeriousXM has been offering and paying the world's largest auto companies a percentage of their SeriousXM subscription revenue to stop installing CD players in their new autos (so customers are forced to subscribe in order to listen to decent music).
But as long as the FEC strictly regulates all AM radio stations (as well as FM), why shouldn't Americans be able to access AM radio stations while driving?
No one is talking about making that impossible as far as I can see.
Without AM radio, how will the authoritarian-right know who to hate?
Nobody uses AM radio for that anymore.
Hated people don't have to be pointed out anymore. Not in an age of social media. They usually give everyone (not just the authoritarian-right, whatever that is) lots of reasons voluntarily.
Like the joke goes:
How do you determine whether someone is vegan?
Easy, they tell you every chance they get.
The authoritarians have NEVER been on the right, and NEVER been on AM radio.
I now seriously wonder if the DC elite know that there are AM radios that are NOT in a car?
What about poor people who can't afford a car? Do they get a free taxpayer paid AM radio for their shopping cart?
I'm pretty much for eliminating subsidies for almost everything. If it's a good idea you don't need to subsidize it.
People still listen to the radio?
Like, they still put *FM* radios in cars? What's the point?
When you can't decide what to listen to, sometimes it's nice to let the radio gods decide for you.
Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) is trying to stop legislation that requires automakers to continue putting dashboard A.M. radio in cars. His new amendment to the A.M. radio bill would also eliminate electric vehicle subsidies.
NO, it absolutely WOULD NOT eliminate EV subsidies. The reason is simple. By removing the purpose of the original bill entirely, while simultaneously adding a provision opposed by the vast majority of those that oppose the original bill, it would GUARANTY the bill didn't pass either the House or the Senate. A bill that can't pass either chamber can't eliminate anything.
Regardless of your position on ANY of the issues addressed, the amendment describes would do NOTHING except kill the bill.
EV subsidies have become a moot point as EV car sales have plummeted. The car lots are choked with brand new EVs and no one's buying.
Yep. And if you don't have that AM radio on, Mister, we're gonna use that Congressionally-mandated engine kill switch and REALLY ruin your day.
I am surprised someone didn't add the only colors are Red, White, and Blue.
I would have preferred if Senator Paul could introduce a bill to get rid of ALL federal subsidies. They should not exist.
Baby steps. We had Trump, he took some.
Slightly off topic, but I'd kill for a simple "Off" switch for the radio in my car. I shit you not - there is no off switch, as confirmed by contacting the car manufacturer. My only choices are keep the volume at zero or, my workaround (since I do like playing an iPod), keep a CD in the CD player I burned with 40 minutes of silence (as the U connect defaults to a CD over the radio)
Besides all that, Radio really sucks nowadays. All generic cookie cutter formats and, in my neck of the woods, tons of country and god rock stations, zero classical, alt rock or even real jazz (as opposed to elevator music jazz)