Is Wichita Mayor-Elect Lily Wu a Libertarian?
"I believe in empowering the individual and limited government. I chose to become a Libertarian on my registration because it spoke to who I was."

Lily Wu—a 39-year-old immigrant, political novice, and registered member of the Libertarian Party—has just been elected mayor of Wichita, Kansas, one of the 50 largest cities in the United States.
Wu, who will become the first Asian-American mayor in Wichita's 153-year history, arrived in the United States from Guatemala when she was just 8 years old. The first person in her family to attend college, she graduated from Wichita State University with international business and marketing degrees. For the past 12 years, she's been a local television reporter, a career she says was inspired by the fact that she learned English by watching the news.
In her first foray into politics, Wu defeated incumbent Mayor Brandon Whipple by more than 10,000 votes and 16 percentage points. In her victory speech on Tuesday night, Wu stressed the importance of making the government "more responsible with the money that is being sorted to us for taxpayers"—a message that will sound familiar to many libertarians.
Other aspects of her campaign, however, have drawn criticism from the Kansas Libertarian Party, notably her plan to hire more cops in Wichita. "Make no mistake: Lily Wu is not associated or engaged with this party," the state party tweeted on Wednesday, even as the national Libertarian Party celebrated her success. (Wu was also backed by a political action committee connected to the free market group Americans for Prosperity.)
In a more diplomatic statement, Tim Giblin, chairman of the Libertarian Party of Kansas, said Wu was a "registered libertarian, but not a recognized candidate" of the state party. While acknowledging that Wu's victory brought more public attention to the party, Giblin also said his group "will be watching closely and loudly. Lily had no problem using our banner as a stepping stone throughout her campaign. We intend to hold her to that."
Wichita's mayoral elections are nonpartisan, so Wu didn't need the nomination of the Libertarian Party to get on the ballot. She certainly isn't the first former Republican to flee that party. And these internecine fights over who counts as a real libertarian are nothing new, of course.
Still, we wanted to get to the bottom of it. So Reason caught up with Wu on Thursday evening to ask about her political views, why she decided to run for mayor, and what she plans to do now that she's won.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity
Reason: What was your message to voters—the "elevator pitch" when you have just 30 seconds to meet someone and convince them to support you?
Lily Wu: I always say that it's important to get back to some basics in Wichita and really talk about the core services that local government should focus on. It's about ensuring public safety, growing our economy, restoring trust in city hall, and building a united community. The mayor's race is nonpartisan, so I really believe that you need to be a bridge builder and consensus builder to try to bring folks together on an agenda that can move forward to become the best place to live, work, and raise a family.
Reason: You've taken some heat from the Kansas Libertarian Party over whether that message makes you a real libertarian. Are you?
Wu: I am a libertarian. I believe in freedom, and I believe in personal responsibility.
For many years, I've heard a lot of dissatisfaction with the hyperpolarization that has happened in America. It has seeped into local politics where we've become very divided So, I chose to become a registered Libertarian, because I believe that speaks to my personal beliefs and the freedoms of America.
But I didn't speak about being a Libertarian throughout the race, because it is a nonpartisan race. Oftentimes people would just ask, "Are you a Republican or a Democrat?" And I would proudly say, "I'm a citizen, because I would love to serve all of Wichita." And I believe that that is the role of being a mayor of the largest city in the state of Kansas is really representing all communities.
Reason: Can you spell out what being a libertarian means to you?
Wu: Being a classical liberal. Believing in personal freedom. I believe in empowering the individual and limited government. I chose to become a Libertarian on my registration because it spoke to who I was.
Reason: Even though this was technically a nonpartisan race, do you think your success says something about voters' willingness to see past the duopoly of Republicans and Democrats?
Wu: I've heard it throughout this campaign: People are tired of the partisan bickering and the hyper-division. In Wichita, I'm an independent voice. That speaks to a lot of, especially, young professionals in our community. We can think for ourselves.
Reason: What do you want to accomplish as mayor? Are there a few big goals you have?
Wu: At the top is the workforce. We have economic opportunities right now within our community. We have a wonderful aerospace industry, but we also are looking for additional industries that can be strengthened. So the very first thing that I would like to do is bring more folks together on those economic opportunities—bringing local government, education, and the business sector together to provide those job opportunities, and that talent pipeline that we need.
And then, above everything else, we as a local government have to provide the core services for our community. Those include police, fire, and infrastructure. Make sure that we do a good job with those, so that people will want to continue staying in Wichita and choosing to come to Wichita.
Public safety has to be the number one thing that we work on together. And I say that the very first thing that we can do is focus on rebuilding some of the relationships that have been fractured between the mayor's office, the police department, and the community.
Reason: There are certainly some libertarians who would say that a focus on policing, and on hiring more police officers, is not a limited-government message. Tell me why you think it is.
Wu: Currently the Wichita Police Department faces a 110-officer shortage. We also have another 100 officers who will be eligible for retirement. In addition, there was a survey of over 400 officers, and 70 percent have looked at another job in the last 12 months. So we have a recruitment and retention crisis within our police department. I believe that what needs to happen is making sure that the police department we currently have, the officers that we want to fill those positions, know that they have a mayor who is supportive of them in terms of respect and resources.
Reason: What about making sure police officers are held accountable when they violate the law or someone's rights? Is there anything you'll look to do in that regard?
Wu: As a reporter for the past 12 years, I've had the opportunity to share not just stories that were positive in our community, but also the challenges in our community—including holding public officials accountable and officers accountable. I believe that accountability has to be something that we focus on.
One of my three pillars is restoring trust in city hall. We need to do a better job of helping our community understand how local government works, and how public servants are helping our community. When there are officers, if they have violated the due process of individuals, they also have due process. But also we need to hold them accountable.
Reason: You grew up in Wichita as an immigrant and as a child of immigrants. How has that shaped the way you see the world and your politics?
Wu: I'm just so grateful that my parents had this dream of one day coming to America. I was born and raised in Guatemala, but my parents are from China. They had that dream, even before my brother and I were born, that they wanted to come to America. And once we were born, they knew that they wanted to come to America to provide their kids with better opportunities—specifically, educational opportunities.
I'm really grateful that we were able to come to America. I'm proud to be an immigrant. I believe that what we have that is truly what makes Wichita so special are individuals in our community—people who are teachers and mentors who want to help. Helping an immigrant family like ours get on their feet and be able to find opportunities, and then we ran with them. In Witchita, anything is possible.
Reason: I doubt that many of our readers are that familiar with Wichita, so here's my final question. Fill in the blank: "The best ______ in Wichita is…"
Wu: The best festival in Wichita is the Wichita Asian Festival. Asian Americans in our community come from anywhere—from Lebanon to India to China to Japan—and our festival has been going on for more than 40 years. We bring people together every single year to showcase the diversity of culinary arts and performing arts, so that people can enjoy Asia right here in the heartland.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
May Wu be blessed with sound and limited governing.
More like Lily Woo, amirite?
Would Wood Wu-Uhd!
🙂
😉
asdf
asdf
He, Eric! First thing you've done that I say THANK YOU for: giving both percentage and votes. I get really tired of reading about anything, whether elections or prices or weights, where you get a number and no context, no way to tell if that's a small fraction or huge.
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart.
This Website--------------> https://bitcoindollar346.blogspot.com
So nothing's changed. Not "Get government out of the way." No, it's "Have government lead the way, get everyone together on the government's page."
Well, she's probably better than most politicians, but libertarian? Only in very generous relative terms.
Not "we need to improve government, we need to get public employees to understand what their bosses, the voters, expect from them."
No, "the community needs to understand their employees. The most voters will get from us is the lip service of calling us your servants."
Given the state of public education, they might actually need to be told what the actual job of the government is.
How do you infer that from such a broad quote? I don't see anything in it that precludes a libertarian orientation, unless that means ramming dogma down everyone's throat at every opportunity.
Anyone who thinks government's job is to lead the way is not a libertarian.
I have no problem with her wanting to add more police, given that mayors are not in a position to change the judicial system in this country.
I have a big problem with any mayor thinking her job is to tell the community what to do.
Me too, but what makes you believe she thinks that?
Maybe you can't read.
It's only a single letter, I've bolded and slanted it to make it more visible. Hope that helps.
Oh, sure, someone just elected mayor is asked, "What do you want to accomplish," and because the answer is, appropriately, first person, you infer bossism? Who are you, Franz Kafka?
Do you read, "I am a libertarian. I believe in freedom, and I believe in personal responsibility.... I chose to become a registered Libertarian, because I believe that speaks to my personal beliefs and the freedoms of America," and translate that to, "Stop hitting yourself"?
I answered your question directly above. Apparently you have no answer, so you make up a question which repeats the question I answered directly above. Let me repeat that for you.
What did you want in response to the interviewer's question, the royal "we"?
Its because brainwashees disguise as anything to infiltrate everything and win either way. If they get elected--or even get votes--other girl-bulliers say see? see? Vill off der Volk! If they are found out, the party they infiltrated is suddenly an enabler of national socialist racial mystical collectivism. The GOP has already been outed. NO WAY can any of them get elected outside of Mississippi and Alabama. Like Saudi plane jackers, they dress like something else to get aboard.
I Agree.
It all depends on the execution. She could just bring everybody together to say:
"Look! Other than calling the cops with Constitutionally-limited powers to protect Life, Liberty, and Property, don't expect shit from me! Low taxes and minimal regulations for everyone and no choosing winners or losers! Now get out there and do whatever peaceful and honest thing it is you do!"
Well, she included this in her policy positions on her website:
"Remove Barriers – Lily wants to make Wichita the best city to start and grow a business. She will prioritize policies that create economic opportunity for all and remove government barriers that stifle growth."
Why does your headline doubt it? Is it because you believe real libertarians can’t be elected in this world? Are you inferring requirements for libertarians the way South Park did for atheists, based on the evidence of Richard Dawkins: “Not only do you have to not believe in God, but also you have to be an asshole.”?
Dawkins isn't an asshole, he's just British.
If she says she is a libertarian, then she is.
That's how it works now.
That's certainly the only consistent criteria by which Reason writers can be labeled libertarian
I mean, it's also kind of true, or at least should be true, of the Libertarian party, to some degree.
It's kind of weird to have an individualist party that insists on specific dogma and policy positions for every member to adhere to, whether they disagree with it or not personally. Especially since there are so many topics where we've found plenty of legitimate room for disagreement. I guess it's one of the innate contradictions of having a Libertarian Party.
Still, we should generally agree on broad principles and framework, even if we come to different conclusions on the specifics.
You just have to accept and live by the NAP. "I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine."
If she later heads up a Jim Jones like cult, and uses that astronaut drink instead of Flavor Aid/Kool Aid, it could be called the Wu Tang Clan.
But definitely not "nothin' to fuck with" amirite?
🙂
😉
I mean, first you have a POTUS whose record is more libertarian than any in maybe a century, but he doesn't count because he doesn't sound like a libertarian should. Now you have a mayor who's not only in the Libertarian Party (as the rules go) but also self-identifies as libertarian, and restates that in several equivalent ways, but she doesn't count because, when talking about what she wants to achieve, she doesn't sound like the archetypal libertarian you have in your head. What does it take?
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart.
This Website--------------> https://bitcoindollar346.blogspot.com
Maybe you should respond to the answers you asked for, before asking new questions to ignore.
Roberta,
How has your life materially changed as a result of Trump's freedom policies?
That's very hard to say, because none of us know how much federal policy has contributed to the arrival or non-arrival of the particular opportunities in our lives.
I agree. For the life of me, I can't tell how Trump's "two for one" EO swap has changed things. And his foreign policy work has no effect on my day-to-day.
In contrast, every time I go to the corner store for beer, I know it's not expensive as it could be due to trucking deregulation. And I have more choices due to beer deregulation.
So, for me, Jimmy Carter is a far more libertarian ex-president than Trump.
And indirectly spawned the craft beer explosion, so not only more choices but more interesting ones.
OTOH if Arthur Burns's Fed policy had continued anon, who knows how much we'd be paying in dollars for beer and everything else by now?
Good point!
But it's more expensive now than it was when he was president due to both inflation and increased in the price of fuel, speaking of trucking.
Does it offset your tax payments and regulations formed by the DoE and DoEd?
I'm significantly less concerned about the feds or various states successfully banning various firearms.
My taxes are easier to do with the increase in standard deduction.
It was nice for a while not having any new wars to pay for or worry about my nieces or nephews getting drafted to fight.
Forcing women to die in childbed is Republican Comstockery and race-suicide fanaticism. The real LP platform said: We further support the repeal of all laws restricting voluntary birth control or voluntary termination of pregnancies during their first hundred days. The prohibition party promptly demanded a federal prohibition amendment to force women to reproduce at gunpoint. Other looters soon followed. Canada abolished ALL such enslavement.
I was born and raised in Guatemala, but my parents are from China.
So, not a Real American(tm) then. She came to this country and stole a job that rightfully belonged to a Republican. Typical immigrant from a shithole country!
Plus, she is of Chinese heritage. You know that means she is actually a spy for the CCP working to undermine American sovereignty right here in the heartland starting with Wichita. Can't trust her.
Cool story, bro.
Keep this in mind the next time you read the comments on an article discussing immigration on the Southern border, or any article having to do with China.
We'll see. Only ideologues would discount that possibility.
How is she a spy?
Last name is Wu. Duh!
Do you have a cite that she is a spy?
Do you want a DNA test?
I asked for a cite that supports your allegation that she is a spy.
Clearly the wrong kind of immigrant. She's for small government and low taxes... and she came here legally. She's not standing in a line in New York or Chicago demanding free housing. This isn't the type of immigrant Democrats want. And she's an Asian immigrant. Excuse me, Asian birthing person, could you please move to the back of the line? The education system doesn't need any of your kind fucking up the bell curves.
The wrong kind of immigrant is the one who comes here in the first place. America is full! Duh!
Reproduction, even if deadly, was mandatory for all women in Guatemala until 1973, when the LP electoral vote was counted for Hospers and Nathan. Roe followed about a month later and only then did the Guatemalan government stop compelling women to die in childbirth. But it is still illegal. This guarantees that more women will die in childbed, just as happened in California before Roe. Girl-enslaving Comstockists never mention the death rate among actual individuals that increases wherever they make labor involuntary.
They can't all be as dreamy as Polis.
Lily Wu is not only dreamy, but Dream Weaver-y!
https://youtu.be/h-0XNyUFUbc?si=Rv998WAfVodnm2OL
🙂
😉
Other aspects of her campaign, however, have drawn criticism from the Kansas Libertarian Party, notably her plan to hire more cops in Wichita. "Make no mistake: Lily Wu is not associated or engaged with this party," the state party tweeted on Wednesday
Hiring more cops doesn't make you a non-libertarian-- or is an anti-libertarian policy. If the Kansas Libertarian Party is against the mere existence or expansion of a police department, that doesn't make THEM libertarians, it just makes them part of the Abolishment movement, which, frankly, puts them out of touch with even progressives at this point. The abolishment movement is the crackpottiest of the crackpot lefty movements which gained brief traction in the bluer-than-blue-found-in-nature blue cities and was one of the most quickly denied and reversed ideas I've ever seen in politics.
"registered libertarian, but not a recognized candidate" of the state party. While acknowledging that Wu's victory brought more public attention to the party, Giblin also said his group "will be watching closely and loudly. Lily had no problem using our banner as a stepping stone throughout her campaign. We intend to hold her to that."
The Kansas Libertarian Party isn't having any illegals pose as citizens of THEIR social construct!
Nothing wrong with Libertarians wanting more Police...with the very emphatic proviso that they be Constitutionally limited in their powers, limited by Civilian Review Boards governed by Constitutional principles, and confined to protecting Life, Liberty, and Property,
Oh boy, so... not much of a libertarian these days.
Actually I think that line was the most libertarian thing she said in the interview. Most people don't even know the term "classical liberal".
But then of course we also see some HyR bloggers finding libertarianism in the faintest scintilla of someone's having an oddly libertarian view and not conforming to the current "teams" in the USA or whatever country is involved. Commenters want to blame some influence of Koch biz interests, but it's way too weird and quirky for that to be what's driving this. It's almost as bad as when people mixed up LaRouche with libertarians.
My impression (I have yet to find a clear declarative statement) is that the Koch brother who ran on our 1976 individual rights for women platform is dead. He is survived by a brother who believes the Comsrtockist doctrine that some women must be forced to reproduce by compulsion. Is this a correct distinction between dead Koch and surviving Koch?
Other aspects of her campaign, however, have drawn criticism from the Kansas Libertarian Party, notably her plan to hire more cops in Wichita.
If you're an anarcho-capitalist, I guess you can make the case against more cops, just like any more any government employee. But, for garden-variety minarchists, police is one of the few legitimate things the government should be providing. There's nothing inherently unlibertarian in policing per se. Hell, even Ancapitsan would have private security services functioning as police.
It's unlibertarian when they initiate force. Drug prohibition for instance.
One clear, encouraging fact remains; she is not a democrat.
But which version of Libertarian is she? There seem to be so many.
Fringe political party whose occasional wins are achieved mostly by republican lites -
“She’s not one of us because she wants to hire more cops, even though law enforcement is a legitimate function of government. We’re going to put her to a purity test and effectively aid the big government democrat challenger if she falls out of line”
GEE, why can’t libertarians win most elections?
She’s the candidate the GOP “should” be nominating, right? Probably anti trump, more socially liberal but fiscally conservative. But the state LP denounces her because…. she wants to hire more cops? Hiring more cops is tantamount to condoning bad cops?
If Hamas ever invaded America they would eliminate the LP last. They’ll just say “our opposition hates immigrants but love cops” and the entire group will be frozen into inaction. Then they can save the bullets for border hawks who don’t want Israel wiped off the map.
>>Wu defeated incumbent Mayor Brandon Whipple
he shouldn't have squeezed the Charmin.
Eric, Anyone who is familiar with Wichita knows that there is no "Witch" in Wichita.
Wichita Mayor Brandon Whipple was defeated by Lily Wu, a "former" republican funded by Americans for Prosperity and other "conservative" donors.
Whipple commented on the overturning of the LP's Roe plank: "“I felt really comfortable knowing that if my wife’s life was in danger, we had choices. It bothers me to think that today we woke up, and if something was to happen to my wife, we wouldn't have that choice. Not only would we lose a child, I’d lose my wife." My question is: has antichoice Tea Party nationalsocialism stealthily inserted a Comstockist mole with funding from asset-confiscating, crash-causing prohibitionists for Herbert Hooverville prosperity?
(https://bit.ly/46XPQX6)
I was just perusing Americans for Prosperity's Web site, and the orientation of its content is clearly libertarian rather than "conservative". What do you see as Comstockian in Wu, and what would a mayor of Wichita have to do with abortions anyway?
"It's about ensuring public safety, growing our economy, restoring trust in city hall, and building a united community."
...none of which are the responsibility of government. Instead of hiring more government goons, *privatize* it. The mere existence of local government takes money *away* from the private sector, which is what grows the economy, not the government., Finally, it's only been in totalitarian states where the populace is "united" and votes in favor of one cause and one party. Healthy difference is vital and critical, not something to be gotten rid of.
Granted the difference between repeal-happy FDR and Germany's Christian National Socialist Staat was healthy. But every fanatic elected shifts government paychecks to the tithing fund both looter parties use against each other. False-flag candidatess installed as fake libertarians serve to convince the communists we are "the same thing" as Trump, Hitler, Wallace, Nixon, Bush, Hoover and other trainwrecks. We have been infiltrated by girl-bulliers before, to the embarrassment of the PA LP in 1992.
Lily Wu is a just another defensive, sheepish conservative masquerading in garish, unconvincing libertarian drag.
Wichita may be one of the "top 50 cities" (because it lacks suburbs), but it is a can't-keep-up, declining backwater whose "metropolitan" area approximate three percent of New York City's.
"Declining backwater"? Unlike the NYC metro area which is losing population, Wichita's is growing. Next time you rant about middle America, try being fact-based for a change.
The difference between city populations and metropolitan area populations is one of the many things that most people and especially media people are confused about. The city of Wichita population in 2022 was 396,192 and the Wichita Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) population was 650,039 (US Census). With 60.9% of the MSA population Wichita does dominate its metropolitan area, but it does have suburbs.
To address your “declining” comment I will add a third city to the comparison. Dallas is a frequent case of media confusion over metropolitan area vs. city. For 2022 the population of the City of Dallas was 1,299,544 and the MSA population was 7,943,685. That is only 16.4% of the MSA population living in Dallas (as hard as it tries, Dallas is not able to dominate the metro area). As a city Dallas is only the 9th largest in the US and 3rd largest in Texas, but as a metropolitan area Dallas is the 4th largest in the US and the largest in Texas. The Dallas MSA includes 8 of the 15 largest cities in Texas, and when the Fort Worth population exceeds 1,000,000 (expected in 2025) the MSA will become the only MSA with 2 cities with a population more 1,000,000. The Dallas MSA population increased by 4.01% between 2020 and 2022. The Dallas metro area is one that is growing and not declining.
All 3 cities had population declines between 2020 and 2022. The population declined by 5.32% in NYC, 0.37% in Dallas, and 0.34% in Wichita. In summary all cities were seeing some population decline between 2020 and 2022. In NYC a large decline, in Dallas and Wichita small declines.
The metro area (MSA) population changes between 2020 and 2022 are -2.61% in New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ MSA, +4.01% in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX MSA, and +0.38% in Wichita, KS MSA. In summary there was a large decline for NYC, modest growth for Wichita, and robust growth for Dallas.
Speak much, say nothing. She fills her sentences with political buzzwords calling for freedom. Government empowering the people implies that the government has power over the people. What do we want? Get the government to step out of the way and let the people thrive. government should step in when a complaint is made about the government violating our rights. our constitution controls and limits the power of government, not citizens. we haven't the right to not be insulted, criticized, or mocked by fellow citizens. Hate crimes should not exist. if people have problems then correct the problem. if you are discriminated for being black, look to the reason why? Just as the Irish were known as drunken brawlers, now serve as leaders. Asians, were the lower labor class are now leaders in education. if the black culture has a problem then change the culture. Travel in the EU and you will see blacks accepted because they adapted to the nation they were in. just as the Irish and the Asians. Our problem in America is the politicians, not the people. Making the people dependent on the government to hold their power is the problem. ---------- I, Grampa