California's Housing Crisis Looms Over the State's GOP Convention
Away from the speeches of the party's presidential candidates, the Republican Huntington Beach city attorney talked up his efforts to thwart state zoning reforms.

It was no surprise that presidential politics dominated the 2023 California Republican Party convention held this past weekend in Anaheim. It would have been hard for them not to, given the presence of four Republican presidential candidates all eager to make a dent in the party's largest-in-the-nation primary to be held next March.
Yet away from the raucous, boozy party atmosphere at former President Donald Trump's Friday lunchtime convention speech, or Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' slightly more sedate dinner address later that evening, an arguably more consequential event for the Golden State was playing out.
In a small salon room off the main ballroom on the second day of the convention, the state's Republican lawyers' association was holding a continuing legal education event on "fighting for local control."
While Republicans haven't managed to win a statewide election in California since 2006, the GOP still controls many local governments.
But the value of those offices as a bulwark against Democratic dominance is being eroded, said Fred Whitaker, the chair of the Republican Party of Orange County, at the local control event, by an "administrative state" that was targeting "the freedom we used to have in our communities."
The panel covered three issues over which the state's Republicans were beefing the most with Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom: elections, school boards, and housing.
There to talk about housing was Michael Gates, the elected city attorney of the Republican-leaning community of Huntington Beach. Since first winning office in 2014, Gates has fought repeated legal battles with the state government over laws requiring the city to plan and approve new housing.
At the state convention, he minced no words about the damage that new housing would do to his city.
"If we don't stand up and fight, we'll lose everything," Gates said. "They're literally coming and carpet bombing our city with these mandates."
It's an interesting fight for an elected Republican to pick.
California's housing market is both one of the most regulated and (not coincidently) one of the most expensive in the nation. Yet Gates is using his office to fight a slew of recent state laws that remove local restrictions on things like duplexes, accessory dwelling units, and subsidized apartments.
It's an effort that puts him on the other side of the work of Republican state legislators, whose votes were crucial to passing some of the housing laws Huntington Beach is now fighting in court.
With Democrats divided on housing, it's one issue where the GOP can still influence policy at the state level.
For instance, pro-zoning reform "yes in my backyard" (YIMBY) activists credit now U.S. Rep. Kevin Kiley (R–Calif.) with rallying crucial Republican support for S.B. 9 (a bill legalizing duplexes on single-family zoned properties) when he was in the state Legislature. Huntington Beach is now getting sued by the state of California for refusing to process S.B. 9 applications.
The local control panel Gates was speaking on was the only event where housing policy was part of the formal agenda. But California's housing crisis couldn't help but interject itself into other parts of the program.
Half the nation's unsheltered homeless live in "communist California," said Trump during his speech. The former president seemingly blamed the problem on lax law enforcement and rampant drug use. But the unaffordability of shelter likely plays a bigger role.
In his remarks, DeSantis made a lot of hay about the fact that California was losing population.
"Growing up in Florida, I don't remember a single California license plate in my life. All of a sudden we see a sea of California license plates in Florida," said DeSantis, all of which belonged to Republicans who'd fled their home state to somewhere that "respected their rights."
But one of the top reasons people cite for leaving California is its high cost of living (of which housing is a huge portion). Of the 40 percent of Californians who say they're considering leaving the state, 60 percent cite the cost of living. That's twice the number that say bad policies and laws are the reason they'd leave.
Every Republican that leaves California obviously erodes the power of those that remain in the state. The high housing costs contributing to people's decision to leave are making the state more and more liberal too.
Nevertheless, Huntington Beach's fights against the Democratic state government got some love from the main stage at the convention.
Trump gave a shoutout during his remarks to Huntington Beach's Republican Mayor Tony Strickland, who's repeatedly sparred with Newsom over zoning reforms, as well as COVID-19 restrictions.
Opposition to state reforms of local zoning rules wasn't universal at the convention.
"If someone wants to build, let them build. Why can't we have freedom in our state? Let's have a free market economy again," Denice Gary-Pandol, a Republican U.S. Senate candidate running to fill the late Dianne Feinstein's seat, told Reason when asked whether she supports state bills allowing duplexes and backyard cottages in more places.
The housing section of the draft party platform that convention delegates were considering doesn't make a clear stand on the issue of state preemption or local control.
"We support policies that encourage private sector investment and market-driven solutions, reducing government red tape that often inhibits housing development," it reads. "We believe in empowering local communities to shape their housing landscape while encouraging responsible growth and development."
At the hotel across the street from the convention, striking workers with the UNITE HERE Local 11 hospitality union blew whistles, and vuvuzelas, and banged on pots with drumsticks. In addition to better pay and benefits, the union is demanding hotel owners support a Los Angeles city ballot initiative that would provide the homeless with nightly vouchers for hotel stays and require hotels to rent out to them.
Hotel owners are dead set against the initiative, which would guarantee no city services or support for the homeless they'd be forced to house. Even some hotel workers testified against the policy when it was being considered by the Los Angeles City Council.
The widespread speculation is that the ballot initiative is more of a negotiating tactic for the unions than a serious policy proposal: give us a better contract or else.
That's some pretty cynical politics in service of an obviously unworkable policy. It's the kind of thing organized labor can get away with when the one party in power also depends on its support, and people are desperate for something to be done about homelessness.
But all the craziness that California's one-party Democratic rule produces hasn't brought much benefit for the state's Republicans.
Instead, an increasing number of Republicans are choosing exit—some leaving California entirely—instead of voice. Meanwhile, the local elected officials the party does have are trying to wall themselves off from state policy, including housing policies that might keep a few more Republicans around.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
GOP Convention
Good for the local hookers and rent-boys.
Why aren’t you there then?
The rent-boys are too old for him.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
He gets 50 cents a pop for his lies.
That's certainly ONE way of looking at it.
With or without restrictions, there's nowhere in CA with a significant population level where the local/county authorities issue permits for construction of more than 50% of the number of new housing units that their own studies predict will be needed in any given year, and that goes back to at least the 1990s.
Regulation and the litigation/political business environment in the State leads to usually no more than 60% of permitted new units actually getting constructed, and also result in the cost of building virtually anything being at a level which makes any creation of "affordable" new housing economically non-viable; Dem pols in the state have their voters convinced that it's nothing more than "corporate greed" which leads to developers only wanting to build "high end" new units because it costs $100-200k per unit more than the median existing unit sale price to build apartments/condos, and apparently wanting not to operate at a 30% guaranteed loss (while still paying exorbitant taxes on everything from fuel to materials to labor) every single year going forward constitutes "greed" on the part of developers in the minds of "progressive" thinkers.
It's deliberately misrepresenting what the state government is doing, too. Sacramento isn't just repealing local restrictions and letting the market sort things out, each city is required to come up with a plan to increase density (whether a city wants to or not), and the state then grades the plan and decides if it is sufficiently compliant, or if the city needs to cram in more people.
“Zoning reform” The Dems now call gun control “gun reform “.
Again, that's certainly ONE way of looking at it.
Reason: “Why can’t meanie republicans just surrender to their betters?”
They California state GOP held their convention in Anaheim? They still have phone booths in Anaheim?
They still have Republicans in California?
They’re working on it.
There's at least enough left in OC and San Diego to fill a medium sized diner, or so I've heard.
It's still amazing to think how big of a role Dick Cheney played in transitioning CA from being either a swing state or leaning Republican to maybe the deepest Dem well in the country; more than 100% of the margin by which the Dems "win the popular vote" for president comes from L.A. County every year. The Aerospace industry and military were huge constituencies in CA in 1990, then there was the raft of base closures and contract cancellations which accompanied the end of the Cold War which devastated both of those sources of employment in the State; local housing markets crashed because so many homes went on the market and rentals were vacated in a short period, and huge numbers of GOP (or at least non-Democrat) voters had to move out of the state to find new employment, as opposed to the waves in more recent years where unusable school systems, incompetent state/local services, and unreal cost of living as well as virtual disenfranchisement of non-Dems remaining here are all major factors in people fleeing the state as well as totalitarian Covid policies in certain parts of the State.
Maybe the biggest surprise in the difference between 2016 and 2020 election returns is that trump actually recieved almost 1 million more votes in CA in 2020 than he had in 2016.
California had more Trump voters in 2020 than any other state.
It is kind of interesting how from 2016 to 2020, CA lost a net of something like 500k taxpaying residents and total voter turnout also increased by more than 3 million votes.
Now that we're down another million or more residents since 2020, it'll be interesting to see how many votes get cast next year.
It has been quite a while since we last did an honorary Dipshit Dave Weigel stock market update, so I guess this is as good a time and place as any to mention that many of the stock market indices, including the Dow Jones Industrial Average, are now negative year-to-date.
Pluggo sez “because of the red hot economy “.
Funny how "Get out of the way and let people sort it out" is never an option.
Government is the big kid on the playground who has more friends than you.
You were the loser who even the nerds beat up.
But at least the School Nurse was paid to act as his friend.
the state's Republican lawyers' association was holding a continuing legal education event on "fighting for local control."
You can't have local control of governance without working control of a local tax base. Sales tax revenues are never controllable locally. Only rates. Income tax revenues aren't even definable locally. Only, maybe, within a commuting radius. Property/land tax is controllable locally - but not in California.
It's not at all surprising that a major - though transparently incompetent - political party doesn't understand what they are really talking about.
"...It’s not at all surprising that a major – though transparently incompetent – political party doesn’t understand what they are really talking about."
Chicken little finally notices the Democrat Party.
Even in a somewhat informed article the mess is still tangible: for one example: there is a difference between the state allowing duplexes and mandating local authorities to allow duplexes locally. For another example, there is no housing crisis in California. If people cannot afford to buy or rent houses or apartments, then they would have to live elsewhere. If government causes or adds to the higher price of housing then, of course, they should stop doing it. If one level of government doesn't like what another level of government is autocratically imposing on them, it's a political issue and, perhaps, a Constitutional issue to be dealt with at the polls or in the courts. Clearly the majority of Californians (the ones who are left I mean) want what the government is doing to them.
And the biggest part of the housing shorting in California is all the state and local restrictions on new development. It takes way too long to get projects approved, way to long to get projects completed, and mandated set-asides for "affordable" units means fewer overall units are built.
McCarthy out, Peanuts.
Send your resume to ZipRecruiter. Another Biden job opening posted.
Job opening: Speaker of the House. No experience required.
Yeah, it’s always a genius who gets that job.
Job opening: Lying lefty shit troll. No honesty or intelligence required. turd lies.
Do you have to be an actual Congressman, or are they "Constitutionally flexible," like California is in appointing Senators regardless of where they live?
Man. You must really be upset now. First act of temp speaker was kicking Pelosi out of her office. Already done more than McCarthy
The former president seemingly blamed the problem on lax law enforcement and rampant drug use. But the unaffordability of shelter likely plays a bigger role.
Really, Christian? You seriously believe that the majority of the derelict bums living on the streets would have homes if they were just less expensive? Have you ever actually interacted with these people? Check in with reality before writing about this again.
He’s just repeating leftist talking points like a good libertarian.
Egalitarianism requires one deny reality in order to not hurt the feelings of the disadvantaged.
It's spelled "bums".
Or as Norm Macdonald called them: Homeless bums.
High housing costs are an explanation for the "van homeless" and the "RV homeless" (although so many of those people now have unobstructed beach views for free, they might not be willing to go back to living in a building 6 miles farther inland), and maybe even some of the people living in passenger cars, but the permanent street-dwellers, and probably a good portion of the "urban camping" movement living in tents under overpasses and in freeway medians are only likely to be remedied by a return to something at least close to the old "state hospital" mental health care model where people such as severe schizophrenics can be put into captive inpatient treatment against their will; something the LP and ACLU have historically been strongly against, and which would require at least a partial repeal of the last Federal law that was signed by JFK (which ensures that the Dems will never abide it anymore than the GOP would look past the undoing of the works of St. Ronald, even though the modern Dem party would excise anyone with JFK's actual positions and beliefs in a heartbeat if such a person tried to join their ranks).
Sure, houses start at 1.5M, but if they were only 1.4M, a lot more people would be housed.
If they were only $100K, people who spend their days drinking NyQuil and screaming at the sky would still be homeless.
The California GOP is irrelevant. Local story.
The 14 right-wing Californians who have fled to Texas or Florida are vastly outnumbered by Californians who have moved to Nevada and Arizona and made them purple-blue.
And are proceeding apace to wreak those states as well.
Why I'm a proponent of closed borders.
Companies that have moved their headquarters from California to Texas include:
Caterpillar
AECOM
AT&T
CBRE
Comerica
Fluor
Jacobs
McKesson
NTT Data
Toyota
HP
Oracle
Tesla
Chevron (moving jobs to Texas)
Just a note, Caterpillar moved from Illinois, not California. Same reasons though.
As if the State that kept Harry Ried in office (and then re-named an airport after him) for decades wasn't fairly "purple" before?
You forgot Colorado and Oregon. They were ruined by Californians long ago.
"California's Housing Crisis Looms Over the State's GOP Convention"
There is no "housing crisis"; more people want to live in coastal CA than can afford to do so.
End of story.
Why don’t those good progressives just give their homes to the homeless?
It would be quite shocking to find out that every Hollywood celebrity doesn't already have at least 20 formerly homeless living in their mansion.
There is a tradition in Hollywood of having an eccentric permanent guest living in your guest house or pool house.
Like Andy Dick?
Kato Kaelin.
Good example. Another famous example would be William Garretson, the drifter who was living at the Polanski house at the time of the Manson murders.
Most of them do provide jobs (and sometimes lodging) for illegal alien immigrant housekeepers and groundskeepers at least.
Huh, I don't follow this politics-as-sports thing much, but I guess McCarthy is out.
Fuck him. Doubt it will work out in a good way since most of the Republicans circled the wagons around him despite the democrat-lite bullshit coming out of the house. It's discouraging that McCarthy did such a bad job but even worse that most Republicans aren't pushing for better.
My take as well. The agreement to go to regular order and reduce spending lasted a whopping 8 months.
The older McCarthy will now crawl out of Hell and take that job! Old McCarthyism, meet the NEW McCarthyism!
https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/online-documents/mccarthyism-red-scare#:~:text=%5BThe%20American%20Heritage%20Dictionary%20gives,in%20order%20to%20suppress%20opposition.%5D
McCarthyism / The "Red Scare"
Shit will be married to the Orange Master Grifter, AKA McBarfyism, in a McCarthyism - McBarfyism duo! Two for the price of one!
McCarthyism / The “Red Scare”
Indeed.
Surprised it took this long. He agreed to his own castration to get the job. That was never going to end well...
Alright Repubs, just make Nancy Mace the new Speaker. She got them big biscuits and is not crazy like the two nutty bitches (MTG and Boebert).
I like Nancy. She fine.
Dude, we all know you’re into little boys.
This is like watching a guy in the closet tell you how hot all the girls are.
It’s definitely creepy.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Republicans are relevant in California solely to the extent Democrats permit them to be relevant.
Fuck off and die, asshole bigot.
California is going to be so great after they drive all the taxpayers out.
34%
Of the nation’s welfare recipients live in California but only …
12%
… of the U.S. population resides here.
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/sdut-welfare-capital-of-the-us-2012jul28-htmlstory.html
But the left assured me it was all those red state hillbillies who were to blame!
Build the wall.
That’s the thing here. The Democrats are doing reverse rent control and net taxpayers know it. . Basically, investors build a new property, but state taxpayers fund 40 percent of the free market rent for 20 percent of the property. Investors make a profit by spreading costs of “AffORDablE” housing to the state taxpayer, democrat voters take over every single district in the state and the investment group profits for the CALPERs union it represents. I dunno, there was an Italian guy in the 1940s, we used to call it fascism.
I believe that permission comes in when anyone points to how retarded the state is.
Woke activist meets reality. Doesn't go well for him.
https://twitter.com/PaulSkallas/status/1709286164157387112?t=WDqaoG2QSlAb3y39CQrVmA&s=19
The wild thing about this story isn't just you can get away with murder in Brooklyn
but the girlfriend of the dead boyfriend refusing to provide a description of the suspect. Ostensibly for socio-political reasons.
[Link]
https://twitter.com/pine_tree_riots/status/1709376378045362374?t=fydFzQcnwL8RrNSW_dEsKg&s=19
was curious about the girl as she kinda just sits there and watches antifa-chapo-bro boyfriend get stabbed to death. her name is claudia morales and there wasnt anything that surprising
ACAB tho!
[Pics]
Or because she hired the hit?
"They're literally coming and carpet bombing our city with these mandates."
Is "literally" literally dead, or figuratively?
I'd be only mildly surprised if the leftists started literally bombing cities.
Where were you 3 years ago? They were literally fire-bombing cities, but it was mostly peaceful.
I was thinking specifically of aerial bombing.
The housing crisis problem will solve itself. Sacramento will only make things worse.
Mortgage rates are already dragging down prices. So is the looming recession. So is the mass exodus to better-managed states.
I am all for zoning reforms in California: let California become a laboratory for socialism, let California destroy every semblance of its middle class, let California turn the entire state into a shithole. I'm glad Reason is supporting California in this effort.
Noice
Google pays $300 on a regular basis. My latest salary check was $8600 for working 10 hours a week on the internet. My younger sibling has been averaging $19k for the last few months, and he constantly works approximately 24 hours. I’m not sure how simple it was once I checked it out.
This is my main concern.......... http://Www.Smartcash1.com