Brickbat: Justice Delayed

Forty-eight years after he was convicted of rape, DNA evidence has exonerated Leonard Mack. Westchester, New York, District Attorney Mimi Rocah apologized to Mack, who spent seven years in prison, for the "incalculable damage and the collateral consequences" that the false conviction brought. The rape victim, and a friend who was with her but escaped, told police the attacker was a black man with an earring wearing a brimmed hat. Cops found Mack about five miles away from the crime scene and brought the victim's friend to him. They asked her if Mack, who was handcuffed and surrounded by cops, was the rapist, but she said his clothes didn't match what the rapist was wearing. So, they gave Mack different clothes, and she positively identified him. The victim said she did not clearly see her attacker, but the friend's identification reportedly helped persuade jurors of his guilt.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Believe all women.
What is a woman?
Well, think of a man, and then take away all reason and accountability.
Or is that cops?
I'm not a biologist.
Can't bring yourself to criticise the cops on the case, evidently.
What did the cops do besides try to find the rapist?
Manipulate the identification, for a start.
Did they though? Or did they pick the first black guy they came to and said "He'll do."
Apparently, as far as Don't Look is concerned, it's the same thing.
Nope.
>>So, they gave Mack different clothes
very rarely is it too ridiculous to mock, but here we are ...
Well, it was 48 years ago.
"WE WERE DOING THE BEST WE COULD WITH THE INFORMATION WE HAD! And really, at this point, what difference does it make?"
funny.
story has posted twice. I came here to say "they did this to another guy? what was going on 48 years ago in law enforcement?"
Pretty much the same thing. The only difference is that now they usually make at least a token effort to cover laziness and incompetence.
But feminist groups and anti-rape groups keep claiming that false rape accusations are not a problem.
Why would they lie?
The ones I know claim that false accusations are something that categorically don't happen.
Unless the person being accused is running for office with a (D) next to their name in the news, in which case the accusers are just sluts looking for attention.
The funniest thing is the outright rejection of the repeatedly demonstrated, in seemingly every context, MO.
Describe your rapist: "He was black, with an earring, and a hat."
Describe the barista who served you coffee this morning: "He was kinda short and wore glasses. Maybe he had a beard or a goatee or maybe he just didn't shave."
Describe the protagonist of the last movie you saw with your SO: "I don't really watch movies."
Describe the guy who bumped shoulders with you at the dry cleaners two weeks ago: "Well, he didn't stop to apologize so I didn't get a good look. But he was kind of like Brad Pitt except maybe a couple of inches taller and with slightly broader shoulders and he had more of Jake Gyllenhaal's eyes. Oh, and his hair was longer, but not shoulder length, and he wore his hair more done up the way Bradley Cooper did in The Hangover, not the way Brad Pitt did in that zombie movie he was in."
Describe the barista who served you coffee this morning: “He was kinda short and wore glasses. Maybe he had a beard or a goatee or maybe he just didn’t shave.”
Geez... assume genders much, bigot?
Right. I thought I was clear that I was impersonating the women/feminist MO. Maybe I should've thrown in some whining about how men are always objectifying women to make things more clear?
This was not a false rape allegation. In fact, as part of the investigation the actual rapist was identified through DNA. The police manipulated the victims into identifying an innocent man. In addition to him serving 7.5 years for a crime he did not commit the actual rapist attacked another woman two weeks later. That is on the police, not the victims. https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/06/us/leonard-mack-rape-exoneration-dna-new-york/index.html
A false accusation is not the same thing as a mistaken identification. If the witness claimed he was the rapist when she knew he wasn't that would count as a false accusation but there's very good reason to believe that wasn't what happened here. The cops showed the witness one suspect, surrounded by cops. When that wasn't enough they dressed him up to more closely resemble the description. This is sloppy and practically begging for a mistaken identification. Even in a traditional lineup, witnesses often assume that one of the guys must be the right one, so they just pick whoever looks closest instead of saying none of them. Once cops have a suspect they like they have a bad habit of ignoring little things such as weak evidence and alternative suspects.
It's well established that eye-witness testimony is notoriously unreliable. When cops use techniques that have been shown to encourage false identifications it only makes the problem worse. In this case one guy did time for a rape he didn't commit. As another commenter pointed out it's even worse than that. While the cops were locking up the wrong guy, the real rapist went on to attack at least one other woman.
Bedevere: How do you know she is a witch?
Peasant: She looks like one.
[Crowd indistinctly shouts]
Bedevere: Bring her forward!
Girl: I'm not a witch.
Bedevere: But you are dressed as one...
Girl: They dressed me up like this. [Crowd murmurs]
Girl: And this isn't my nose. This is a false one.
Bedevere: [inspects the nose and confirms] Well?
Peasant: Well, we did do the nose.
Bedevere: The nose?
Peasant: And the hat. She's a witch!
Peasant Crowd: Burn her!
Bedevere: Did you dress her up like this?
Peasant Crowd: No, no, no! [beat] Yes, yes. A bit. But she's got a wart.
I feel like I saw this same Brickbat several days ago.
I thought I was taking crazy pills.
You did. I *thought* it was strange that there were two brickbats that day. They must have published this one early accidentally.
Ah, that makes sense. I do note that the comments here have timestamps that predate the article's date so it looks like they just retagged the article.
Round up the usual [black] suspect.
Pro tip: If the cops ask someone to identify you as a perpetrator, then ask you to change your clothes so they can try again, don’t.
You say that like they would give the suspect a choice.
I'm having a strong feeling of deja vu.
I’m making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website… http://Www.Easywork7.com
Cash generating easy and fast method to work part time and earn an extra $15,000 or even more than this online. By working in my spare time I made $17990 in my previous month and I am very happy now because of this job. you can try this now by following
the details here...... https://workscoin1.pages.dev/