Rick Perry on Psychedelics: 'These Are Medicines That Were Taken Away for Political Purposes'
The former Texas governor spoke with Reason's Nick Gillespie at the Psychedelic Science 2023 conference in Denver.

Republican Rick Perry served as governor of Texas from 2000 to 2015 and then did a stint as secretary of energy from 2017 to 2019. He describes himself as a small-government conservative. He's not in favor of legalizing all drugs, but in the last five years he has warmed up to the idea that psychedelics could be a valuable and legitimate treatment for trauma.
Reason's Nick Gillespie sat down with Rick Perry in June at the Psychedelic Science 2023 conference to discuss how poorly the U.S. deals with those suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and how he believes that psychedelic-assisted therapy can help.
Q: How have you changed your mind about psychedelics?
A: When I got introduced to this approximately five years ago, it was through a young man [Morgan Luttrell] who worked with me at the Department of Energy.
I was the secretary of energy and he was seeing some of his colleagues in the special operations world—this is a former Navy SEAL, who, interestingly enough, today is a United States congressman. He's the one that started getting me comfortable with "Rick Perry" and "psychedelics" in the same sentence. His twin brother, Marcus Luttrell, lived with us at the governor's mansion as my wife and I were learning about post-traumatic stress disorder and how poorly our government was dealing with this. And we were trying to find solutions to help heal this young man.
Q: Can psychedelics help individuals struggling with PTSD?
A: I've educated myself about the history of this and why psychedelics got taken away from the research world, from the citizens at large. These are medicines that were taken away for political purposes back in the early '70s that we need to reintegrate. The potential here is stunningly positive.
I'll give you one example: Rachel Yehuda, Ph.D., who's working at [Veterans Affairs] in New York. She has two studies in phase three that are showing just amazing results. They have classic symptoms—anxiety, depression, sleeplessness, suicidal thoughts, one or all of those. Seventy-five percent of those individuals who are treated have zero symptoms after six months. Those are stunning numbers.
Q: Do you think people in your political tribe will be able to grasp this message about psychedelics treating trauma?
A: This is an education process and the short answer is yes, I do. Because I'm not for legalization of all drugs. We need to go a little more pedestrian here. Government has fouled this up substantially in the past. Let's not give them a reason to mess this up, again. Let's go thoughtfully at an appropriate pace as fast as we can.
Government needs to be limited. It needs to be restrained at almost every opportunity that you can. We haven't been very successful with that in our country.
What I try to tell people is that this isn't partisan at all. Let's take our labels away on this one. This is about humankind. This is about taking care of individuals. This is about saving lives. This is about giving people their lives back.
This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If a mental giant like Perry can support them then they must be good...
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
My last salary was $8750, ecom only worked 12 hours a week. My longtime neighbor estimated $15,000 and works about 20 hours for seven days. I can’t believe how blunt he was when I looked up his information See My Name Check Visit
.
.
.
For Details►——➤ http://bigmoney8.store
He’s giving the white power salute though.
See, we just need to give enough influential people other reasons to oppose restrictions on liberty, case by case. Build sympathy, not backlash.
Jesus, is Rick Perry selling that many ads that you all repost this every other day?
Poor girl-bullying MAGA trumpanzees... so much factual sand kicked into so few slack-jawed faces!
Aren't these the same folks bible-thumping about the evils of weed ? And now they want to push psychedelics ?
No, they're not the same. But I'm sure it's difficult for a Collectivist to think in terms of the individual.
"All rook arike"
If Rick Perry's on psychedelics, it explains an awful lot.
Psychedelics have never been “medicines”. In order to be “medicines”, they would have to be characterized and standardized as such. “I know a guy who took this stuff and it made him feel better” doesn’t turn a drug into medicine.
They were prohibited because people had (and have) legitimate concerns that they cause mental health issues in a significant number of people while at the same time, they did not seem to have any beneficial medical use.
Over the last few decades, we have discovered that these drugs may have medical applications, so that question is being revisited.
I’ll be happy to join you in condemning FDA drug approval processes as a whole. But to claim that psychedelics were singled out and outlawed because of some right wing moral panic is b.s.
Even at the time, there were serious people who thought these drugs might have significant benefits for some users. It's true they can have bad effects on some people, but then again some people suffer severe reactions to many widely used medicines. Psychedelics never got much chance for formal study before they were banned because "Ermegerd, hippies gettin' high!" Yes, it was a moral panic, albeit pretty bipartisan.
Nobody can name three people LSD had bad effects on. George, John, Paul and Ringo managed to support the entire British government and draw crowds with no disabilities other than the Klan burning their records in Alabama. Eric Clapton, Jack Bruce and Ginger baker were still OK at Albert Hall after 38 years of psychedelics. Jimi, Jim and Janis were evidently victims of a Nixon-induced shortage of non-toxic acid.
Where can I get an mp3 of this miraculous rehabilitation of a looter politician? I want to listen to it walking the dog.
FOUND IT! Impressive mangu-AI.