Small-Town Life Is the Anti-Twitter
The era of the internet could use a little of the discipline, moderation, and tolerance imposed by a familiar, physical community.

When I moved from New York City to rural northern Arizona, I faced two obstacles: my vocabulary and my manners. Spicy language and brusqueness were normal in the East Village, where I was unlikely to see many faces again. But they were impediments in a sparsely settled place where you run into the same people day after day. Life in a relatively rural area encourages nicer manners, so I learned to rein myself in.
The lesson doesn't come easily for everybody. "Could you do me a favor?" a Flagstaff bartender once asked me. "Could you go talk to that tourist for me? He's from New York, like you, and I just…can't. The beers are on me if you deal with him." I spoke to the guy, who resembled an exaggerated version of myself from a few years earlier. He wasn't deliberately rude, but he was in-your-face and sharp-tongued, reflecting manners shaped by faceless crowds.
"For centuries," Conor Friedersdorf wrote in 2010 for The Daily Dish, "one reason people have chosen to live in cities is the comparative privacy that they offer: unlike [in] the small town, where everybody knows your business and community ties are pervasive, the city dweller can cultivate strong community ties if he likes, even as he is an anonymous man in the crowd everywhere except his apartment elevator, his weeknight soccer league, and trivia night at the corner pub." Friedersdorf wondered if the internet would end that anonymity.
It is harder than it used to be to disguise our online identities, as anybody who has been doxxed over a tweet can attest. But the internet did allow "city dwellers to calibrate their community ties as they saw fit," in Friedersdorf's words. Anybody can find communities in the digital world. But small towns and rural areas make you interact with familiar and not always like-minded people when you step outside.
"Everybody knows everybody," retired journalist Bill Bishop noted in a 2022 Politico interview, describing La Grange, Texas, the rural town he moved to from Austin, the state capital, several years ago. "Everybody goes to the same church. Everybody goes to the same clubs. The town isn't big enough to have a liberal club over here and a conservative club over there. If you're working on X problem, you work with everybody, and so the size of the place mitigates against segregation."
Bishop is the author of The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart (2009). By moving from Austin to La Grange, he aimed to counter the phenomenon he had documented of self-selection into ideologically homogeneous communities. He wanted to put himself on the other side of the political and cultural divide in a search for understanding. He discovered that his new community was more blended and required greater contact with different people than the city he left behind. "The diversity of small towns is more interesting than the sort of mono-politics of the big city," he noted.
That diversity and familiarity can also be demanding. If you blow your stack at the clerk in the grocery store, it will be remembered. If you cheat somebody on a business deal, forget about future investors. And if you get caught frolicking on an exam table with one of your medical assistants, as a married local physician near here did a few years ago, call the movers; you're done.
That's not to say you won't find curmudgeons in rural areas; we're knee-deep in them. It's been 20 years since my buddy Bryan passed away of complications from a brain infection. (I wrote about him in 2013 in "Leave Room for the Mountain Men.") He was committed to an eccentric lifestyle, living off the grid for half the year. But Bryan knew how to behave in town; those who don't tend to drift and disappear when their reputations are tarnished. It's a lot easier to get away with misbehaving on Twitter than in the few places available to sell you food and beer.
Seeing the same faces every day isn't for everybody. Anonymity can be a powerful temptation, with its assurance that mistakes and lapses of temper won't follow you as baggage. But the era of the internet could use a little of the discipline, moderation, and tolerance imposed by a familiar, physical community.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Your neighbors have been far too tolerant of your cancerous existence, Tuccile.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
Yeah, he does seem pretty cunty. I probably would be, too, were I named "Jerome" and were from New Yawk.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,900 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,900 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Bravo!
Very true.
I wouldn’t have taken him for a Jason Aldean fan though.
Nobody from Arizona considers Flagstaff to be "rural." It is a fairly big town, 2 hours from phx metro that has a university and ski resort.
Another, Prescott, Bisbee tombstone are far more rural. Flagstaff is the 3rd biggest metro area in Arizona.
I see the same "rural" commentary from the California transplants who now live in Couer d'Alene. CDA has a Costo for Christ's sake.
No town is rural. It might be surrounded by rural areas, and it might be quicker and easier to get to a rural area, but it's fucking town, so by definition it is NOT rural.
Arizona has quite a few one road towns that I would consider rural. Just a mile strip for major shops.
I'm with you on this.
Officially, the definitions are largely fucked. NY, TX, CA, ME, ID, MD, and NJ all have very different notions of what constitutes "urban" and what constitutes "rural".
Unofficially, it's pretty much like fame. If I walked into any bar, church, store, restaurant, post office, or other public gathering place in the home country or even home state and said "OMG! Did you hear what happened to [community name]? It's been wiped out!" the probability of urban vs. rural falls pretty directly along "What happened?" vs. "Where?" replies.
I would expect 80-90+% "What happened?" responses in the US outside of pretty much anywhere else named "Flagstaff".
I live in a town. Maybe 10k-15k population.
I don't consider it rural even though there isn't a Wendy's within 10 miles (I am very annoyed by this fact).
I do not live in a town. The closest "town" is three miles. It has a gas station, 270 people, a lake and a public boat ramp.
It is fucking rural.
Growing up, I lived in a small mountain town of around 400. We had a grocery store, post office, fire brigade, and three bars. Around an hour in either direction if you wanted anything remotely metropolitan. Best years of my life.
I lived near a town of 500 people as a kid. It had a gas station, a grocery store, and two bars. There was a bigger town of 7,000 people ten miles away if you needed anything.
"By moving from Austin to La Grange, he aimed to counter the phenomenon he had documented of self-selection into ideologically homogeneous communities."
And that shack outside La Grange, where there were lots of nice girls, might have been a motivation.
how how how.
"It is harder than it used to be to disguise our online identities, as anybody who has been doxxed over a tweet can attest."
It's not all that hard. Just stop putting all your shit online for starters, and start pulling all the personal shit you vomited online.
Close your LinkedIn. It's not helping your career, anyway. It's just a vanity project.
Close all your social media accounts. If you do have a Twitter (X) account (and I don't know why you would unless you didn't get enough attention from your parents as a child), don't use your real name.
Avoid using the same username and email address across multiple sites.
Don't write online reviews.
Get your name off those stupid "people finder" websites, that get your info from credit bureaus. Opt out of them. Better yet, get a credit card that monitors the "dark web" and removes that shit for you.
Take it up a notch and put your house/property into a trust so your name doesn't show up in government records and parcel searches.
Ok, so maybe it is harder than it used to be, but *you* made it harder by putting all your personal shit out there and then tweeting stupid shit.
Very street-wise words.
They used to have to hire the CIA to spy on you if they wanted to prepare a dossier on your political beliefs, known associates, relatives, vacation plans, frequent travel destinations, and embarrassing activities. Now everyone assembles the dossier on Facebook for them, for free.
Yeah, Flagstaff metro has 145,000 people. Isolated is not the same as rural. I'll give the author some props for living on 1.86 acres in Cottonwood (population about 13,000), but it's still in a neighborhood/subdivision surrounded by other houses. It's not really rural.
And it's far too easy to doxx this guy.
I appreciate you using your internet skills to support my point about the ease of doxxing people. That's why my wife and I are always armed, so that we can enforce our standards for good manners should anybody misuse that ability.
You better have more to tell the cops than: “He was rude”.
Only Charles Bronson can pull that off.
Defense is a good strategy. I employ it. (And as a NAP adherent and travelphobe, you need not worry about me.) But the first line of defense is to get your personal information off the internet.
The title clearly says “small town” not “rural” per se. Although the concept is somewhat flexible, a town of 100,000 or 10,000 is still small enough for one to become widely known by a significant percentage of the residents. La Grange is less than 5,000 population and is clearly small enough to qualify. I never actually lived there but even so a significant number of La Grange-ites new me by reputation when I entered the annual Czhilispiel once.
100K is not a small town. 10K still is.
So you decided to prove the author's point by being the exact kind of internet rando that doesn't understand or respect boundaries?
Well done?
I'am made $84, 8254 so far this year working online and I'm a full time student. Im using an online business opportunity I heard about and I'AM made such great money. It's really user friendly and I'm just so happy that I found out about it. Here what I do,.for more information simply open this link thank you.......
I highly recommend everyone to apply.. .. salarypay.com
I didn’t post any personal information, and the personal information I found took mere seconds to access. Should be a wake-up call to everyone who puts their entire life online and fails to manage their digital footprint.
Unironically, you are the problem.
I adhere to the NAP. How exactly am I the problem? Unironically?
Reason is missing the most libertarian story of the year:
An eccentric “anarcho-capitalist”, Javier Milei, won the most votes in Argentina’s open primaries this past Sunday, in a Right-wing populist shock to the establishment.
Milei calls himself a libertarian, while his supporters wave the yellow-and-black Gadsden flag of the US Right. He has consistently held extremely liberal positions on drugs, prostitution, immigration, firearms, and gay marriage. It sounds like an Internet ideology, cooked up on message boards — an impression underlined by his defence of a market for human organs. Lately, though, he has moved closer to other figures of the new Latin American Right, such as Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro or Chile’s José Antonio Kast, railing against “Cultural Marxism” and gender ideology.
https://unherd.com/thepost/javier-milei-is-not-a-south-american-trump/
Interesting, thanks for sharing.
His running mate holds some views contrary to his. If Milei is a Mises-trained libertarian who can accept some heresy from allies, he's a unicorn indeed.
When will the CIA kill him?
Will they go straight to killing him or just start another color revolution?
They covered it 3 days ago.
They covered it. I was a bit surprised that they covered such a far-right firebrand so neutrally.
An Anarcho-Capitslist running for political office.
*Monty Python shrug and eye rolling.*
It isn't the Right that waves the Gadsden flag, it's libertarians.
Never having lived in a "small town" my experience is limited to doing audits in such places and talking to the residents. Is the atheist tolerated? How about the gay couple? Maybe the neighbor who moved from the Big City is tolerated and allowed to assistant-coach the Little League team, but will you invite him over for a cookout with your high school buddies from 20 years ago? There's probably all sorts of class divisions that may not be as noticeable as Park Avenue vs. Park Slope.
Not if they’re an opinionated asshole who picks at minutiae and looks for personal rejection everywhere, while knowing next to nothing about their new neighbors beyond their ignorant stereotyping.
Sure: atheists and gay couples are tolerated in small towns.
People like you? Not so much.
Like me? So a tolerant libertarian would not be welcomed?
Yes: arrogant, left-wing bigots are not welcome, even if they pretend to be "tolerant libertarians".
Never been called a left wing bigot before. Check your premises.
Pay him no heed. MYOB2 thinks those barbaric STARs camps in Utah for teens accused of so-called "porn addiction" are like Club Med.
Correction NOYB2. He needs proper identification so you don't end up in his Stepford beehive collective.
TheReEncogitationer, a founding member of "fascists for libertarianism".
Big town resident who implies that small towns discriminate against atheists and gay couples? It's clear what you are.
Never having lived in a “small town” my experience is limited to doing audits in such places and talking to the residents. Is the atheist tolerated? How about the gay couple?
At least you admitted your ignorance. Having lived in both (and in the suburban middle):
re: "Is the atheist tolerated? How about the gay couple?"
Absolutely, yes, they are tolerated and included in the community.
re: "will you invite him over for a cookout with your high school buddies from 20 years ago?"
Maybe not. Just like your big-city neighbors won't invite you into their high school clique. That said, you are more likely to be invited by your small-town neighbors than in the big city because your isolation is more likely to be noticed in the small town. Some people will reach out because you are the stranger. If anything similar happens in the big city, I never witnessed it. They will allow you to fester in your self-selected anonymity.
I can’t speak for anyone else, but when I moved from NYC to Moncks Corner, SC, I found myself more included in social events in the first few months than I had in twenty years in New York. Heck, my (now) wife and my last neighbors in NY were shocked when we invited them to our apartment warming party.
And, as to class divisions, I'd say city-life is much more class-siloed than smaller towns. As Tuccille suggests, there really aren't enough people to segregate by class in small towns. On the Upper East Side, you can go through much of your life without more than passing pleasantries with people outside your "station".
Small towns are different in different parts of the country. Some places you have a built up area surrounded by large farms. Some places there's a much smaller commercial area and more spread out houses and smaller farms and such. I'm most familiar with small towns in northern New England, which tend to be of the latter type. New Englanders tend to be less gregarious than some but will rather ignore the outsider than be any kind of hostile.
A bit surprised the Rev hasn’t already posted how the denizens of rural areas and such small towns are the bitter losers in his “cultural war (oh why can’t it be revolution)” and will inevitably be swept up into the dustbin of history; meanwhile he dreams of (and whacks off to) forced reeducation gulags
He must have got his flourishing cape caught in the drive shaft of a Ford F-150 á la Isadore Duncan.
🙂
😉
The "try that in a small town" of articles. lol. It amazes me that the fuckers in "rural northern Arizona" have more say in the government than the folks in New York City.
Just my "fuck off" to you, J.D. You suck, and you are complicit in driving the shittiest narrative. I like Reason, but not you.
Are we watching the slow-motion red-pilling of Tuccille?
Tuccille:
"I love me my small town America"
Also Tuccille:
"Let's have open borders, free drugs, tents on the street, and general lawlessness. At least in the big cities, where I'm not living. Because libertarianism."
Well, that wouldn't be you, since you proudly wear your father's name and can literally be found within five seconds, no doxxing required.
>>If you blow your stack at the clerk in the grocery store, it will be remembered.
don't blow your stack at the clerk in any grocery store ... who dafuq are you don't be a dick
New Yorkers. Just about as simple as that. City people tend to be assholes, but those from New York are exceptionally aggressive douchebags.
Smart People don't fall for small-town niceties and Oxbridge pleasantries.
"New York must be the friendliest place on Earth. Imagine 7 million people, all wanting to live together." (G'day mate.)
Indeed. Anyone who treats the hired help of any business like shit is a piece of shit themselves, whether they are the small-town ruffian or some wealthy stick-up-the-ass in a big-city political machine.
Twitter Is The Anti-Small Town Life.
FIFY. Small town life was here before Twitter and it will be here long after Twitter is gone. Small town life doesn't need Twitter to go anywhere or do anything any more than Twitter, as a means of conveying 140-character messages between two or more people, needs small town life to really do anything. But then, in accordance with your own implications and themes, we aren't talking about just "small town life" and "conveying 140 characters between two or more people" are we?
FIFY. Small town life was here before Twitter and it will be here long after Twitter is gone.
Small towns were the fifteen-minute cities before the Fifteen Minute City was a thing.
People in small towns are permitted to have cars and leave. So, for that matter, do residents of big cities. In both cases, lots of services are already available within 15 minutes.
The distinguishing feature of the Fifteen Minute City is not what they provide, but in the restrictions they impose.
That was actually a very good article.
Well done.
Everybody can earn $500 dollars Daily… Yes! You can earn more than you think by working online from home. I have been doing this job for like a few weeks and my last week payment was exactly 25370$ dollars.
This Website OPEN HERE.>>> http://worksathome1.cf/
Good reporting as always. One of my diplomatic corps brat school chums related how shocked he was by racial collectivists after moving to America as a teenager. At my first U.S. school a roomate dinned incessantly about the JYOOZ ruining Amerikkka with their Fed and Yewnited Nayshuns. Thousands of graduates from American and British schools abroad see only too starkly things muted into pastel shades by inevitable familiarity in These States.
""Everybody goes to the same church. Everybody goes to the same clubs. "
...but if you're an atheist or perhaps are interested in something other than the Meese or the Elks or the Daughters of the Confederacy, or you want to start a PFLAG group or try to get your neighbors to recycle, you're immediately ostracized or worse. Look at Matthew Shepard. Beaten, tortured, and strung up on a fence. I'll take the big city any day.
So, basically, because your small town neighbors won't conform to your preferences and wishes they're "oppressing" you.
And by the way, the Matthew Sheppard case sounds a lot more like a drug deal gone bad than a hate crime, as described by ABC News, hardly a right-wing Middle America apologist.
abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=277685&page=1
>>try to get your neighbors to recycle
big city scammiest of all big city scams
“Try to get your neighbors to recycle.”
Miserable busybody.
Oh, for fuck's sake. You literally can't tolerate the choice of some anonymous stranger living in Podunk not to care about your bullshit dogma. Guess what? Nobody is obliged to celebrate whatever whimsical garbage pours out of your skull. You're not special. Get off your knees, stop being a victim, and accept that no one owes you a fucking thing.
Look at Matthew Shepard. Beaten, tortured, and strung up on a fence. I’ll take the big city any day.
Now do O’Shae Sibley, DeAndre Matthews, Mark Carson, and Islan Nettles, all brutally murdered in New York City for being either gay or trans.
Well, that's why there are lots of different small towns.
Pick the one that matches your preferences, instead of lecturing others about how they are mean to you because they are tired of your whining about recycling or veganism.
Matthew Shepard was killed in a crystal meth-related crime.
You know, the kind of thing that happens in big cities every day by the dozen and that people like you don't give a f*ck about.
If only there were some kind of online "social credit score," so it would be more like a small town where your neighbors are always in your business?
Somehow that doesn't seem like an improvement....