Biden's New Student Loan Payment Plan Has Arrived. Here's What That Means.
Biden's new income-driven repayment plan is estimated to cost taxpayers $360 billion over the next decade.

Applications are now open for a new student loan repayment program which will cost taxpayers billions and turn most federal loans into glorified grants.
The SAVE plan is a revamped income-driven repayment (IDR) plan, introduced last year along with President Joe Biden's original student loan forgiveness scheme—though that proposal was struck down at the Supreme Court in June. While the SAVE plan received less attention than Biden's now-defeated student-loan forgiveness proposal, it stands to do nearly as much long-term damage to taxpayers—and prospective student loan borrowers themselves.
Under the REPAYE plan, the most popular IDR plan currently in use, borrowers' monthly payments are typically fixed at 10 percent of their discretionary income. Discretionary income is calculated as earnings above 150 percent of the federal poverty level. Under this plan, borrowers will have their remaining balance forgiven after 20 years of on-time payments, or 25 years for graduate borrowers.
But the SAVE plan radically reduces monthly payments—and the time required before forgiveness. Under the plan, borrowers only pay 5 percent of discretionary income, which is now defined as earnings above 225 percent of the poverty rate. Borrowers only have to make 10 years of payments before forgiveness, if the balance is less than $12,000. Further, interest will not accrue on borrowers' loan balances when their monthly payments are not enough to cover interest.
According to an analysis from the Penn Wharton Budget Model, the new plan is expected to cost around $360 billion over the next decade—a staggering price tag, though not quite as much as the over $500 billion predicted cost of one-time student loan forgiveness.
But the new IDR plan won't just cost taxpayers an absurd amount of money. It will also make college even more expensive than it already is. In making student loan payments minimal or nonexistent for large swaths of borrowers, colleges will be incentivized to raise their prices, extracting more funding out of the government through loans, all while assuring prospective students that they won't feel the financial burden of a large student loan balance.
Currently, undergraduate programs are at least somewhat constrained in how much they can charge because of a cap on federal student loan borrowing for undergraduate degrees. However, there is no similar limit on graduate borrowing, meaning that graduate schools can instruct students to borrow virtually infinite sums of money from the government—and encourage them to enroll in a SAVE plan to pay it all off.
The introduction of the SAVE plan serves as both an admission of failure and as an inability to right past policy errors. Colleges began radically increasing prices due to the expansion of federal student loan availability over the past several decades. Graduate tuition increases have also been directly linked to the removal of the cap on federal student loan borrowing in 2006.
Instead of doing the obvious—curbing federal student loan access—the Biden administration has asked taxpayers to foot the bill for past policy mistakes, accepting a future where higher education costs more than it should.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Robbing the poor to give to the rich.
Never vote for a democrat.
I should ask all my old coworkers at the trucking company if they appreciate the opportunity to pay for the student loans of folks who went to Harvard.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,600 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,600 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
I am sure the truckers would support the college grads more after the educated elites come to the warehouse and lecture them on genders.
You can't rob the rich, they own too many politicians.
Imagining they are Robin Hood, while acting out the role of the Sheriff of Nottingham.
There is a misconception in Robin Hood. He didn't rob from the rich and give to the poor, he robbed from those who taxed unfairly and gave to those who were taxed unfairly. In the Errol Flynn movie they saved the money for Richard the Lion Hearted.
No wonder that clown in the picture refuses to show his face; that is the cost of stupidity, not opportunity.
Nothing says "entitled cunt" like demanding people help you pay off nearly $200,00 in loan debt.
If your family won't do it for you --- why the hell should I?
Because, rest assured, he comes from a lot of money.
At least there will be a list of everyone who takes advantage of this program. That might prove useful some day.
I love pointing out to lefties who brag about how smart they supposedly are, that they can't even figure out how to pay off their student loans.
Especially after the opportunity to earn a living with a PhD in 14th century feminist African film studies turns out to be elusive.
Does it mean that we can expect another downgrade in our national credit rating?
Wait, I thought Emma said just a couple of days ago that they'd worked out a way where these student loan changes were magically free.
$360 billion? Seems free to me.
Other people's money, i.e. not theirs, not those they're forgiving, our fucking money. Ergo, it's "free" to them.
I'd be ok with this, if the loan program was ended entirely afterwards, and the price of the payoff was the right to vote. These people have clearly demonstrated an inability to plan, they should not have a say in the path the country takes.
We should let the students off the hook for their loans, but be forced to pay someone else's loan. Seems fair to me.
Actually, any provision of funds from the government, as grants, loans, or wages, should nullify the recipients' right to vote.
I don't know. Seems like they planned way better than I did.
They took out loans to get advanced degrees that increase their earnings, and were smart enough not to pay them off so the government will give them a bonus.
I, on the other hand, was not smart enough to borrow a ton of money, paying out of pocket.
Obviously, they planned way better. They're getting more salary and getting their loans covered! I'm just paying taxes, like a dumbass.
This too will be challenged in court and fail.
Challenged in court, yes. Fail? Not so sure. The legal basis for this change is a lot more plausible than the last one. Still morally unethical and fiscally irresponsible but those are beyond the proper mandate of a court to judge.
It still is a $360BN expense (over ten years) without congressional approval. The President is trying to find a way to either give his supporters free college OR blame his political opponents for his inability to do it.
How can one be smart enough to borrow all that money for college and not understand what will be required to pay back their loans?
As a reminder, President Obama and Michelle walked into the White House owing student debt... That was after Barrack collected Millions for his first two autobiographies, but he and Michelle chose not to pay-off their student loans, because it was 'cheap money' with negligible interest payments (they could do better making monthly payments and investing their money elsewhere).
I bet the Dems will not love Republican Presidents using novel legal theories to spend unallocated monies in the future.
If someone defaults on a student loan, sell them to the Chinese and let them work if off in a Uighur slave camp. I'm sure that degree in Gender Studies will be very helpful there.
Has anyone told Joe Biden about this?
Fuck college grads who can't pay their student loans.
A new student loan payment plan was never needed, since each borrower already signed a loan agreement when they took out the loan and promised to repay it. Simply enforce the terms they originally agreed to.
Yeah, the guy in the photo who took out $200k in student loan debt? That's on him.
Meanwhile, my own repayment plan auto-debits are finally restarting in September, but based on the hour or two that I spent on the servicer's website, I'm stuck at the minimum monthly payments, and there's no way to increase the auto-debit amount. (lots of options for lowering it) Previously, I was paying double voluntarily to pay down principle more quickly.
It is just a democrat president protecting those democrats who major in low IQ fields that get low paying jobs in fields that the didn't major in.
Democrats don't represent taxpayers, they represent donors and non-taxpaying voters.
Yeah but, but, but; $360B is only $1,000 for every one of the 120M working US citizens. What's another $1,000 taken by gov "armed-theft" from those 'icky' productive people? Gosh it's practically nothing in comparison to the multiple other $1,000 stolen every hour by inflation games, crony socialism, borrowed "armed-theft", etc, etc, etc.... /s