Democrats Propose Eliminating Student Loan Interest
The plan's supporters say it won't push costs onto taxpayers.

A group of congressional Democrats has introduced legislation to eliminate interest rates on all current federal student loans—and cap interest rates of future loans at 4 percent. The plan further sets aside student loan payments in a trust fund, which the bill's sponsors say will allow the plan to be funded without offsetting costs onto taxpayers.
While the full text of the Student Loan Interest Elimination Act has not yet been published, a fact sheet of the bill published by Rep. Joe Courtney (D–Conn.) notes that the bill would "refinance the interest rate of all existing federal student loans to zero percent and cap interest rates for future borrowers," adding that "the interest rates for future student loan borrowers will be based on a sliding scale determined by financial need."
Currently, interest on federal student loans is used to pay for the cost of running the program. However, the fact sheet says that the bill would direct the Education Department to create a trust fund that would provide funding for the federal student loan program without offsetting costs onto taxpayers.
"Student loan borrowers will make payments on their principal balance and these funds will be put into the Trust Fund. The Trustees overseeing this fund would invest payments from student loan borrowers into a variety of bonds, including municipal bonds and Treasury bonds," reads the fact sheet. "The returns on those investments would fund the costs of operating the student loan program—saving taxpayers from fronting the bill while saving borrowers from higher interest rates and student loan interest capitalization."
"The Student Loan Interest Elimination Act is a strategic way to deliver student debt relief to Americans most in need. For many, the interest on student loans is more than was originally borrowed," said Rep. Jahana Hayes (D–Conn.), one of the bill's co-sponsors in a Thursday press release. "This legislation will save tax-payer dollars while also addressing the student loan crisis in this country."
The approach is the latest—and most moderate—move by Democrats to reduce the amount paid back by student loan borrowers. Unlike other Democrat-led student loan proposals—most notably, President Joe Biden's recently defeated $400 billion student loan forgiveness plan—this latest bill doesn't propose foisting its costs onto taxpayers.
While the proposal is a welcome change after a year of fierce support for incredibly expensive student loan reforms, its worth noting that the Student Loan Interest Elimination Act attempts to alleviate a problem caused by the government getting involved in the student loan business to begin with. It's long been accepted that the federal student loan program has driven up the cost of college. If Democrats really want to reduce students' debt burden, they should probably start by cutting back the federal student loan program.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The plan's supporters
say it won't push costs onto taxpayersknow the ones supporting them are financial illiterates.I have just received my 3rd payment order and $30,000 that I have built up on my laptop in a month through an online agent. This job is good and his regular salary is much better than my normal job. Work now and start making money online yourself.
.
.
Go Here——————————————————>>>>> https://majormoney4.blogspot.com/
fr
Change Your Life Right Now! Work From Comfort Of Your Home And Receive Your First Paycheck Within A Week. No Experience Needed, No Boss Over Your Shoulder... Say Goodbye To Your Old Job! Limited Number Of Spots Open...
Find out how HERE...... http://Www.Smartwork1.com
Presently You’ll gain Up To from 99000 Bucks A Month! There are no confinements, Be Your Claim Boss, it All depends on you And how much you want to earn each day. {vfa-254} This is often a veritable and ensured strategy for gratis to win a tremendous entirety of cash at domestic.
.
.
Tap THIS Interface______ newjobshiring.blogspot.com/
They're betting on a bumper crop from the Jackson trees this year.
Make money online from home extra cash more than 18000 to 21000 Dollars. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received 26000 Dollars in this month by just working online from home in my part time. every person easily do this job by.
.
.
HERE====)>> elizabethashley8.blogspot.com/
You know, these online scams make at least as much sense as Democrats.
Move the reply button
How about the trust fund receive the payments (plus interest) that the borrowers agreed to repay and invest them by ... making interest-bearing loans to new students! smh so much
Remember that Congress has the power to forgive the student debt – the President doesn’t. Congress also has “plenary” powers as regard taxes (e.g., income taxes) that are permitted by the Constitution. What is “income” is subject to interpretation – if our SCOTUS is suitably packed it can rule that “wealth” is nothing more than “retained income”, and a wealth tax therefore will be constitutional. Solutions follow:
(1) elect a Democrat House, Senate, and President (a must for the following solutions to succeed, but should be imminently “doable” with the right voting and vote counting procedures) – protecting the “Big Guy’s” incumbency is de rigeur for success of the other steps in this debt forgiveness process.
(2) House and Senate pass and the “Big Guy” signs law forgiving all student loan debt in return for an agreement by all student loan debtors to pony up the required 10% "for the Big Guy".
(3) House and Senate pass and the “Big Guy” signs law defining wealth as retained income, and institutes a wealth tax annually of a mere 4% on all net worth greater $100,000, exclusive of “investment assets” (i.e., stocks, bonds, gold and silver bullion, Hunter Biden's art purchased solely for "investment value" and therefore not displayed) so that the tax does to houses, cars, boats, 4-wheelers, all weapons of any type at assessed value [you will be required to take all of them to a Federal Weapons Appraisal Center for listing, registering, and assigning a value to] and all bank accounts and CD’s at a 4% levy per year) – with exemption from this levy under the PPGG (Past Presidents Get Goodies) amendment to the original act, extended to all past presidents who have not been indicted for a federal crime. Note that no “bag man” activity is required for the exercise of this exemption.
(4) House and Senate pass and the “Big Guy” signs a surtax (also court approved in the past) on incomes of all those who don’t have at least a bachelors degree. The amount shouldn’t need to be more than 6% surtax nor should it be less than 3%, out of “fairness”
If any readers have or are envisioning having financial difficulties, either due to provisions suggested above, or the fact that they are still heavily invested in fossil fuel extraction, processing, or use I am willing to provide financial advice that will “protect them” for my 10% of their assets (no exclusions to this asset list – I get my 1/10 of everything). (My son will come by monthly with non-descript crocus sack that will not attract undue attention (that was previously used for equine sweet feed) to collect the 10.) My financial expertise should be apparent if you read the 4 parts of the student debt solution above. My services, if retained, will include having my colleague Harf the nation about why this is a good idea that will work.
How about the
trust fundUS treasury receive the payments (plus interest) that the borrowers agreed to repayand invest them by … making interest-bearing loans to new students! smh so muchand the US government get out of the student loan business going forward.Boy, if you think college is expensive now, wait until you see how pricey it can get with interest free loans from Uncle Sam.
This .
But ultimately, this is also the problem with unchecked capitalism. The price will go up because of greed. There will be no increase in cost to perform or to cost of business, it will be just greed to suck in more money driving the price up. In fact quality will decline because every fool with building that they can slap "university" onto it will try to get in on the free government money.
You can't solve problems in capitalism with altruism; it just doesn't work.
Yeah, that pesky greed stuff that motivates people to seek more, and thus get creative and work harder and trade aggressively and lift billions from poverty.
Retard.
Damn you unchecked capitalism and your state owned and operated colleges! Is there no level of greed that will satiate you?
Hey wait a minute…
And the predatory lenders in the federal government!
Yet the problems with socialism are infinitely more, because the leaders are also greedy, but desire un-restricted power too.
Capitalism only works when the people, not the government, decide who gets paid and who doesn't. If colleges have no reason to compete for the people's dollar by providing more or charging less, because the government will always make up any arrears, why should they?
Yep. It’s just another transfer of wealth from taxpayers to democrat students and leftist universities.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Everyday there must be a brainstorming session in D.C. where the participants come up with ways to buy the votes of another "deserving" group.
Eliminate government student loans and force the universities to come up with a business model that does not rely on exorbitant tuitions—like they use to have. If the government wants to help the universities, give them direct subsidies instead of subsidizing students with loans that don't get repaid.
Administrative bloat in higher education has gotten so bad over the last three decades that many universities now employ more administrators than professors. But the problem at Yale University is even more serious than that: Yale has more administrators than undergraduate students. According to the Yale Daily News:
Over the last two decades, the number of managerial and professional staff that Yale employs has risen three times faster than the undergraduate student body, according to University financial reports. The group's 44.7 percent expansion since 2003 has had detrimental effects on faculty, students and tuition, according to eight faculty members.
As evidenced by the financial report from 2002-2003, Yale employed 3,500 administrators and managers while there were 5,307 undergraduate students enrolled at the university. Less than two decades later in 2019, before the pandemic affected enrollment, Yale employed more than 1,500 additional administrators while the undergraduate population had only risen by 600 students. Now undergraduate enrollment has dipped to 4,703, with more than 5,000 “managerial and professional staff.”
Meanwhile, professor of English Leslie Brisman made light of the situation, remarking, “I think we don’t yet have a Vice President for the rights of the left-handed, but I haven’t checked this month,”
The Ivy Leagues are basically hedge funds that operate a university as a side gig these days.
I think the loans are a major source of the bloat. The colleges are pulling so much money from being able to freely raise tuition that they struggle for things to spend it on. So they hire. VP of southpaw rights lol.
https://twitter.com/Mark_J_Perry/status/1467959926567931913
Just out today:
@OhioState
has a small army of 132 "diversicrats" at an avg. salary of $77,000 and total est. payroll cost of $13.4M, which would cover in-state tuition for 1,120 students
a "welcome change"? What the actual fuck. This is a classic "door-in-the-face" technique of persuasion. They ask for a trillion dollars to pay off student loans and when the door is slammed on their face, they knock again and say "okay, so no trillion...but what about 500 billion?" No way this isn't going to cost taxpayers a ton of money.
Better idea.
Create the initial capitalization of the trust fund via confiscation of all of the campaign funds of the democrats (and any other fool who supports it), plus asset forfeiture of all property of all democrats in excess of one house and two cars.
Then only make loans from that trust fund; not another dime in tax money.
The current loans, under the original terms, will be paid back into the treasury from whence they came.
(and as long as I'm dreaming, a pony for every kid)
Hey now, let's not forget yanking the endowment of every university that has accepted federal student loans in the last 20 years. These pigfuckers want nationalization, let's give it to them good and hard.
Are Democrats economic retards or are they evil communists?
They're evil elitists. They don't want communism for themselves.
The purpose of communism is to transfer all of a countries wealth into the hands of a few elites sold to the idiot masses as equality...and murdering a bunch of people along the way is just a little psychopath bonus.
Democrats are conservatives with unearned guilt. Look at the GINI coefficients, environmental hazards, poverty and homelessness in all the "Blue" states and cities and you'll know they don't give a damn about anyone else but themselves.
Yes.
s/or/and/
1
"Democrats Propose Eliminating Everything They Don't Like" Claim it won't cause anything bad to happen - Promise!
Oh, come on. Just tax the rich and that’ll pay for everyone to go to college for free.
Can’t wait to be a freshman at 74.
At 74 you probably think men are men, and will be expelled in the first two weeks.
How about just throwing all those who aren't willing to pay the debt exactly as written and WILLFULLY signed by them and agreed to be thrown in jail for theft.
Ya know; like back in the good days when JUSTICE was ensured.
I was kinda open to some form of this idea. 4 years of compounded interest on an investment that produces no yields until after the term is a rough startup cost on an investment when an individual lacks capital and assets. It digs a hole right from the start. The idea, of course, is that this is an investment in marketable skills that will produce yields that quickly overcome the interest. What we are being told is that these degrees are not valuable enough to justify their cost. I see that as a reason to consider different interest rates, but mostly an example of the abject failure of universities. They are increasing costs for a product that is declining in value. Until that is part of the conversation, any talk of bailing people out is a bandaid over a festering wound
I disagree that this is a failure of universities. The unrelenting narrative from politicians for decades now has been, "Because college graduates earn more during their lifetimes than others, everyone should get a college degree." They go on to claim that, to avoid a growing gap between rich and poor, black and white in America, anyone who cannot afford a college education should get subsidized. It is the proper function of universities to 1) study all academic subjects; and 2) teach all subjects of interest to students, granting degrees recommended by the faculty in those academic areas. It is not the proper function of universities to determine what careers their students might use those degrees to further or whether there is any demand in the market place for salaried employees holding those degrees.
After creating a huge and growing demand for "college degrees" without giving any thought at all to which degrees would actually lead to increased lifetime earnings or help marginalized demographics escape the poverty trap; and without giving any thought to what increasing demand would do to the price or quality of college educations; and without any statistical or epidemiological justification for assuming that because, on average, college graduates earn higher incomes, that everyone holding a degree in a random subject will earn a higher income or that massively increasing the supply of people with college degrees in art history or social studies looking for jobs and careers might significantly decrease the lifetime earnings of college graduates on average over time.
And they have no idea that the more degrees there are, the less they're worth.
The interest rate on student loans should reflect the unemployment rate in the major field. If 90% of all art history majors are not employed in an art-history field, we clearly have no need for more art history majors, so we should certainly not subsidize the creation of more of them. If some trust fund kids wants to take art history, that's fine if they pay their own way; if someone else really wants to take art history, be prepared to pay large interest payments.
The problem here may be that students don't start out thinking they are going into art history but find out that is what they are left with. There are many college degrees that will earn very good salaries. The hitch is that these often require very strenuous class work. Fifty years ago, when I was in college the course that separated the art history majors from the business, engineering and science majors was Calculus. If you were not ready to take this course, you were not going to end up in the big earners category. Now college was cheap in my day and a degree would get you enough to pay back your loans. That is not the same today. You can't start out thinking you will be an accountant, engineer, or chemist and just fall back on a liberal arts degree if you cannot cut the work.
There are plenty of things wrong with how colleges work and how government pays, but there is also a problem with incoming students. You cannot catch up in college you need to be ready at the start.
One common difference between the high earning majors like engineering and Low earning majors like sociology is IQ. I'm not sure that those who pick the low earning majors wouldn't be better suited to occupations like sales or others that are more based on personality.
Traditionally, the lowest test scores and IQs get education degrees.
Ok, I'm not getting the "no cost" part here.
They're funding it with payments from currently outstanding loans, right?
OK, so say I have $100K in the bank. I take $50K of that and lend it to a friend to start a business. He promises to pay me 11K a year over 5 years.
I decide to do this again, lend out another 50K, except not charge the interest. It doesn't cost me anything because I'll invest the money I get from the money I lent out to the first guy.
Except, somehow, I'm out 50,000 boku dineros here. I started out with $100,000, "funding" the second loan from the payments on the existing loan isn't free. Especially if I've decided to be generous and cancel the interest on that loan. It's $50K I once had, and now will never get back because it has become an endowment for the sake of free loans, which tie up my second $50K... Setting up the business COST ME 50K. It wasn't free unless that 50K landed back in my bank account and I could do with it as I please.
Wait, this is the Federal government, who is deep in debt, right? Let me change that from "I have $100,000 in the bank" at the beginning and say "I borrow $100,000 on a credit card, then lend out 50K". The more I think about this the worse a ponzi scheme it looks to be.
This math doesn't work. There's no definition of "free" here.
this latest bill doesn't propose foisting its costs onto taxpayers.
Emma, you're wrong here. Completely and totally wrong. The outstanding debt on current student loans is an asset owned by the taxpayers. Those taxes were financed by the taxpayers, and they are owed that money and the interest thereon. Using it for any purpose other than replacing the money that the taxpayers have already been taken for is "Foisting its costs onto taxpayers."
If both people pay you back, wouldn’t you only be out the 5k that the second guy didn’t have to pay in interest?
No, he doesn't mention the part where he hired an entire staff to track the loans he was making, so he's also out the cost of paying that staff.
He's also out the alternative uses of that money. Instead of loaning it out at no interest and "putting the money into a trust fund and investing that," he could simply have invested the $100k in the first place and not had the hassle of the loans, many of which won't be paid back even at zero interest.
He also doesn't mention that he doesn't actually *have* $100k -- he took that $100k from a lot of innocent people with either force of arms or promises that it would be used for their benefit -- very few of those people then got to benefit from student loans.
And if the Feds give borrowers a gift in the form of free cash (from forgiven principal payments, or below-market interest payments), the cost also gets passed on to anyone who actually has cash, because inflation spikes and the cash is then worth less.
+10000000; Inflation. Just another form of Ponzi Scheming theft.
If my labors only returns 70% next year of what was earned that is theft. A fiat-game type of theft.
Aren't we borrowing like $100B per year to fund new student loans?
So taxpayers borrow $100B at current T-bill rates (6% or so now?) then hand that money to students who *may* someday actually be required to paid the principle back (but may never do so for any number of reasons).
How is that not "foisting its costs onto taxpayers"? Even ignoring inflation and opportunity costs. WE BORROWED THE MONEY AT INTEREST THAT WE"RE LENDING OUT INTEREST-FREE!?
Yeah, one more way this is bleeding money.
It's like how Social Security is funded, aka a ponzi scheme.
It's like they don't understand economics, at all. Or the time value of money. Or return on investment. Or inflation. Or voluntary exchange.
Why would someone want to loan you money now, to be paid back later with money that isn't worth as much? Usually the lender wants to make money, not lose money, and has other places to invest if you're not making it worth their while.
No one would want to. That's why the feds switched from a "private loan guaranteed by the government" system to a "the government loans you the money" system. In both systems the taxpayer holds the liability for loans not paid back, one indirect and the other direct.
We went from private loans to “private loan guaranteed by the government”because it "wasn't fair" that people were being rejected for student loans. So the guarantees were geared toward getting lender to lend to unworthy borrowers.
Still "wasn't fair" that private lenders wanted to get paid back. So government pushed them aside in favor of becoming the actual lender of record. Note that it was at this time that the government made it almost impossible to discharge student loans (from the government) in bankruptcy.
Some of them understand economics but ignore it for political reasons. The others don't understand economics but couldn't care less because "economics is hard."
What they do understand is that if they give out free shit, they get votes.
And they understand that nothing else matters.
fvfdbdfbdfbdfbdbdbdb
When will the dummycrats understand the more they help, the more expensive college will become? Never?
When will the bank robber understand the more they help themselves to everyone's earnings the more ?expensive? it'll be?
They never will until JUSTICE is restored and they are prosecuted for their crimes against others. What to do when government starts working for the criminals instead of ensuring Liberty and Justice for all.
"While the full text of the Student Loan Interest Elimination Act has not yet been published..."
Look out for the "immunity from all further charges" paragraph.
A goodly chunk of student loan debt was used to fund a latte lifestyle at luxury student housing, because Jackson and Heather could not be expected to share a simple dorm room with communal showers. God forbid!
Our UTK off campus housing community is so much more than just a place to live. Our vibrant, modern community offers residents full access to resort-style amenities catered to meet the needs of all our residents, so they can have a successful college experience. From our lavish resident clubhouse with spaces for work and play to our outdoor recreation space outfitted with hot tubs, hammocks, an open-space theater, and so much more! You’ll love living here!
Community Amenities
The Deck
Hot Tubs
Open-Air Theater
Grilling Areas
Hammocks
Pet-Friendly
Dog Park
Resident Clubhouse
Big-Screen TVs
Pool Tables
Individual Study Rooms
Gated, Covered Parking Garage
24-Hour, Cutting-Edge Fitness Center
Media Cafe Computer Center
Coffee Bar
Community-Wide Internet
Apartment Features
Fully Furnished Apartments
High-Speed Internet, Cable & Trash Included
Individual Bedrooms
Private Bathrooms With Granite Countertops
Roommate-Matching Services
In-Unit Washer & Dryer
42-Inch Flat-Screen TV
Stainless Steel Appliances
Modern Kitchen With Granite Countertops
Spacious Closets In Each Bedroom
Individually Locked Bedrooms
Wood-Style Floors
Ceiling Fans In Each Room
This fails the Banking 101 test. If you’re financing both new loans and administration out of principal repayments, you don’t have money to hand over to your cronies through a “trust fund”. Unless you dramatically reduce the number of new loans you make. And even then, the lendable funds dwindle on administration and defaults.
Corrupt to the core. Democrats will sell their children for a vote. Gutless, spineless cowards.
Sadly, they are selling OUR children.
(their kids were aborted)
It's the interest, which begins compounding after the first semester. By the time you graduate, you owe far more than what you borrowed and unless you immediately get a high-paying job, which is unlikely for most degrees, you're way behind the 8-ball already. The interest on each monthly payment is close to what you might expect of a payment of principle and interest. Fix the interest rate and compounding schedule and that will ameliorate much of the problem. At least make it so no interest is charged or compounded until after graduation.
So, more incentives to stay in school forever? Can't wait until we need funding for university assisted living dorms for all the retirement age "students" who never left.
Democrats Propose Eliminating Students
Loan InterestGreat idea. At least half don’t belong in college.
I will undoubtably be labeled a “boomer” for this and I will deserve it. My wife and I often wonder about the lifestyle of today’s college students. College was cheaper and we seemed to live cheaper also. We shared apartments, often apartment that were pretty run down. Lived on the cheapest food. Drank the cheapest booze. Most of us had part time jobs for a little spending money. Few if anyone had cars, you walked, biked, or took the bus. I live in a college town and the new apartment building going up look better than any building I lived in during and after college. I know that tuition has gone up and I wonder about the food and lodging costs.
I’m gen x…when I went to college one of the gyms still had a restroom with toilets with no stalls. And my boomer parents had large families with 1 toilet. As young people demand more privacy then housing costs will go up. I support more privacy and obviously air conditioning…but at some point the goal should be reducing the cost of college. And the goal for every private college should be free tuition for in state students from middle class families after maxing out Pell Grants and state merit scholarships. And Harvard and Yale should allow donors to donate to HBCUs and get the same benefits as donating to Harvard and Yale along with all of Epstein’s donations going to HBCUs.
This is the economic equivalent of flat earth theory.
Of course, the same people practice the same idiocy when calculating the cost of climate change.
I suppose they are consistently economic flat earthers.
Make $9,000-$12,000 A Month Online With No Prior Experience Or Skills Required. Be Your Own Boss And Choose Your Own Work Hours.
Thanks, A lot Start here
Open This Website........................>> https://www.dailypay7.com/
Isn't the trust fund the same as what George W. Bush wanted to do with Social Security? I also feel that Democrats fail to understand the concept of time value of money.
I don't think the President can void the contracts, of others.