All Birth Control Pills, Not Just One, Should Be Over the Counter
The FDA decision is only a mini step toward freeing the pill.

On July 13, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finally allowed women to access one birth control pill over the counter. The FDA signaled in May that this was likely to happen after an advisory panel recommended that the agency approve over-the-counter marketing of the progestin-only oral contraceptive Opill, manufactured by the Dublin-based Perrigo Company. Progestin-only oral contraceptives have been around since 1973. Dubbed the "mini pill," these contraceptives have their limitations.
For example, women must take the pill at the same time every day, within a three-hour window. If they miss the window, they must discontinue the pill and begin again with the next cycle. With standard birth control pills that combine estrogen and progesterone, women who miss a daily dose can double up the next day. Women who take progestin-only pills have a slightly lower risk of developing blood clots that can break off and travel through the body (venous thromboembolism, or VTE) than they do with combination pills. But the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), which has for decades advocated making all hormonal contraceptives available over the counter for women of all ages, states the risk of VTE "with combined oral contraceptive use is small compared with the increased risk of VTE during pregnancy and the postpartum period."
ACOG is not the only medical professional organization calling to free the birth control pill. It is joined by the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Medical Association. And most reproductive health care providers surveyed in 2016 favored over-the-counter birth control pills. These medical experts, who get paid to evaluate women and prescribe hormonal contraceptives, have the financial incentive to argue for maintaining the status quo. When they repeatedly assert that women do not need their services to obtain birth control pills, regulators should take notice.
The FDA approved over-the-counter emergency contraception, the so-called morning-after pill, for women of all ages in 2013. These pills (for example, Plan B) usually contain high progestin levels. But standard birth control pills can also be used for emergency contraception. The required dose is 8-10 pills. The FDA denies women over-the-counter access to contraceptives with one-eighth to one-tenth the potency of over-the-counter emergency contraceptives.
In a Cato Institute white paper, Director of Health Policy Studies Michael F. Cannon and I pointed out that birth control pills are available in more than 100 countries without a prescription. In a January 2020 Los Angeles Times column, we explained that switching a drug from prescription-only to over-the-counter status typically causes its price to fall. But don't expect prices for the mini pill to fall soon. Because the FDA will only allow women to purchase this one brand of mini pill without a prescription, it will be shielded from price competition by rival brands.
Minors can buy lethal amounts of acetaminophen and ibuprofen without a prescription. Yet adult women must get a permission slip from another adult to exercise the right to contraceptive self-medication. And we other adults—licensed health care clinicians—think the requirement is preposterous.
The FDA took a mini step in the right direction by allowing women over-the-counter access to one mini pill. But Americans should not be satisfied until all forms of hormonal contraception are set free from the government's yoke.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Perhaps OTC should be allowed only for those proving they are fully vaxxed and boosted.
Make money online from home extra cash more than 18000 to 21000 Dollars. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received 26000 Dollars in this month by just working online from home in my part time. every person easily do this job by.
HERE====)> https://MoneyManaged4.blogspot.com
I have just received my 3rd paycheck which said that 16285 American Bucks that i have made just in one month by working online over my laptop. This job is amazing and its regular earnings are much better than my regular office job. Join this job now and start making money online easily by
.
.
.
.
just use this link…………………… https://Www.Topearn7.Com
I think a birthing license showing they are competent to handle these matters should suffice, citizen!
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,700 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,700 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Jfree approves.
I'm guessing someone at the FDA owns stock or has friend. Some kind of money is exchanging hands. The FDA picks themselves to be winners.
Perhaps OTC should be allowed only for those proving that they voted for the 10,000 Year TrumptatorShit-Reich, Libertarian Comrades!
Do you realize that you mention Trump far more often than anyone else who comments here?
He mentions Trump almost as often as my local Daily. Almost.
You do know that Trump is the leading Republican candidate for 2024, don’t you?
Caw caw!
Explain 2020 to jan 2023 before he declared.
You know who the leading Democratic candidate is? Let's see how many Biden articles are on my local daily...
Let' me see, carry the one... Oh, ONE:
Nice and neutral, no controversy, just here's something the Biden administration is doing.
I mean, FFS, you don't have to have BDS to wonder if there's something going on in the administration that might be worth reporting on, something that center-left journolisming might have just a sort-of-kind-of feeling that needs some exploration on.
I'm not asking my local daily to become Fox News, I'm just asking them to start acting like adults.
Politico does a better job than my local daily.
“ Let’s see how many Biden articles are on my local daily…”
Are you a customer of your local daily? Do you pay them any money?
Orph orph!
Man, sometimes you are just boring as hell Sqrlsy.
Just wait for the weekend, when the staff slacks off on medication protocols.
Maybe all trade should be banned for those not vaxxed and boosted, and those that are could have a tattoo on their foreheads or wrists with something like 666 so the poor store clerks doesn't have to ask for vaccination card everytime?
Or maybe we could just get rid of paper and coin currency and have digital dollars that if you are not vaxxed and boosted your card will be declined everywhere until you get vaxxed and boosted, and the penalty for giving people not vaxxed and boosted could be the firing squad? Utopia!
All
Birth ControlPills, Not Just One, Should Be Over the CounterOr better yet, all medicine, all goods and services, should be free from government regulation.
* Fire KMW
* Move out of DC
* Make liberty your first consideration in every article
Yes, utility matters, and is more convincing to a lot of people. But Reason is supposed to be libertarian, not utilitarian. Get your fucking act together.
When will they realize that they are hurting us? I just wish they didn't have to hit us so hard because they love us. It's like being in an abusive relationship.
We have to abandon libertarianism to save libertarianism.
We have to erect the Perpetual TrumptatorShit, to Avenge the Stolen Erections of Der TrumpfenFuhrer, and THEN True Libertarianism will follow! First things first!
All Hail the 10,000 Year TrumptatorShit-Reich, Libertarian Comrades!
Get back on your meds.
Get your fucking act together.
I was going to say *exactly* the same with respect to “You have to take it at the same time every day or start all over again the next month!” bullshit. So, if it were like insulin and you died if you didn’t take it daily at the right time, it would be OK for the State to regulate it? Knock off the AWFL-whore “Whaddya mean we can’t fuck everyone in the hot tub and get any adverse consequences covered? Oh woe is me!” bullshit. It’s not feminist or libertarian, it’s just lazy and immoral.
Where did anyone say it was OK for the state to regulate the pill that you have to take at the same time every day? The point was that it and others should be allowed OTC.
TL,DR: Men/Adults: I got my leg blown off in the Gulf, it's tough, but I wake up every morning take an Aleve and get to it, we should end war. ENB: OMG! I forgot to take my pill this morning, now I have to choose between condoms, a diaphragm, abstinence, "abstinence", having a kid, or icky conservatives who won't let women abort at will. What a pain!
Did you read the whole post? The point wasn’t that ENB was saying to regulate other drugs, the point is that how cumbersome and efficacious it is, especially when it comes to birth control, is an abjectly shitty libertarian argument and, really, is just ENB trying to “swivel her hips” and convince everyone of her feminist bona fides by advocating on behalf of the insanely egotistical, immoral, and unlibertarian clown show of what she considers a “free and empowered woman” to be. Probably billions, certainly at least 10s of millions of men and women take a vitamin every morning, drink *exactly* 64 (or whatever) oz. of water , take *exactly* 1 g of protein/lb. of bodyweight, get in 10K steps, brush their teeth, floss, shave, feed their pets, feed their kids, several/all of the above, and more, *every* day without fail. We shouldn’t ban the pill because ENB or whomever can’t remember to take their pill every day but that’s not a reason to legalize it. What it is is a sign that whomever it is doesn’t have their shit together and ENB hedging in favor of abortion based on that lazy distractedness. Asking for it or anything to be legalized in such a fashion converts it from an insistence on a right to a request for a handout (which, covered by mandatory insurance, it already was). She/they aren’t asking for a drug because as a responsible adult, they have the right to put whatever they want in their bodies as long as they can suffer the consequences themselves. They’re asking as an irresponsible child who can’t remember to get out bed and brush their teeth at the same time every morning or figure out how to deal with things otherwise.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: you used to be smarter than this Zeb and I don’t mean, “You used to agree with me more.” I mean, “Even if you didn’t agree with me, your comprehension wasn’t that poor and/or you would at least recognize that it might be.”
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: you used to be smarter than this Zeb and I don’t mean, “You used to agree with me more.” I mean, “Even if you didn’t agree with me, your comprehension wasn’t that poor and/or you would at least recognize that it might be.”
You have also changed your commentary style over the last while. You have become far more aggro, in both your initial commentary, and your responses to replies. Now, I'm not going to throw any stones about that from within my stained glass cathedral of rage here, but I can see how it might make other people find it more difficult to follow the argument you are presenting.
Your initial comment in this thread sounded significantly less like an argument against regulation of medication than simply a screed against ENB. It was certainly not immediately obvious that you were agreeing with Alphabet, or what it was you disliked about ENB's position other than it wished to further enable slatternly behavior.
*shrug*
I couldnt agree more. For once say something libertarian, Reason. Just something. Anything.
OPEN BORDERS!!!
All ethics and social structures should ultimately make sense on a practical level. When you boil them down to their essence libertarianism and all other -isms should be illuminating where it is wise to place long-term considerations over short-term considerations.
Only a Perfectly Libertarian People will vote for a Perfect Libertarian government, with ZERO consideration given to utility! Not gonna happen! Unless we erect a Libertarian DictatorShit!
(And that is what The Donald offered us, in the minds of many FAKE libertarians, actually authoritarians, who comment here! Fortunately, The Donald's lusts to kill democracy failed... This time!)
Der TrumpfenFuhrer ***IS*** responsible for agitating for democracy to be replaced by mobocracy!
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/24/politics/trump-election-warnings-leaving-office/index.html
A list of the times Trump has said he won’t accept the election results or leave office if he loses.
Essential heart and core of the LIE by Trump: “ANY election results not confirming MEEE as Your Emperor, MUST be fraudulent!”
September 13 rally: “The Democrats are trying to rig this election because that’s the only way they’re going to win,” he said.
Trump’s constant re-telling and supporting the Big Lie (any election not electing Trump is “stolen”) set up the environment for this (insurrection riot) to happen. He shares the blame. Boys will be boys? Insurrectionists will be insurrectionists, trumpanzees gone apeshit will be trumpanzees gone apeshit, so let’s forgive and forget? Poor Trump was misunderstood? Does that sound good and right and true?
It really should immediately make us think of Krystallnacht. Hitler and the NAZIs set up for this by constantly blaming Jews for all things bad. Jew-haters will be Jew-haters, so let’s forgive and forget? Poor Hitler was misunderstood? Does that sound good and right and true?
I will agree if you add stopping all government subsidy as well.
I came here to say exactly this. Survival of the fittest. If I’m too stupid to choose my medicine correctly, it’s on me. If I need help, I can go to the doctor, but if it’s freaking pink eye, I can figure that one out without my permission slip.
Funny how this in the same page as an article about journalism.
"with combined oral contraceptive use is small compared with the increased risk of VTE during pregnancy and the postpartum period."
So comparing daily use to an occasional pregnancy, which the woman is trying to avoid, so it is even less likely.
"The FDA denies women over-the-counter access to contraceptives with one-eighth to one-tenth the potency of over-the-counter emergency contraceptives."
Again, a one time dosage compared to daily use.
And, for the rest of the story:
https://thefederalist.com/2016/11/10/hormonal-birth-control-dangerous-dispense-without-prescription/
Does this make me a journalist too?
The most effective form of birth control is abstinence, which has few side effects and doesn’t require a prescription.
Whoa there buddy, expecting people to accept the responsibility of owning a human body as their property is way out of line! You just want the handmaid's tale to be reality! You, who clearly value property rights, need to give up the benefit of the labor you put your property through so that I can enjoy the benefits of your labor!
Good thing the government is there for me, otherwise bigots like you might actually not have to give me your money. Although at this point, the government is most likely borrowing in your children's and grandchildrens name to pay for my unhealthy lifestyle, because enslaving your children for my benefit is justice!
Women still don't realize they lost the sexual revolution.
Thankfully my children cannot be enslaved because they don't exist. Abstinence worked!
Transing kids is also very effective.
Not as effective as trancing them.
Actually, abstinence is no more effective than blow jobs and other forms of non-sperm injecting sex.
There may be ethical arguments for abstinence, but they need to be made, because not getting pregnant is not a sufficient argument.
Few of the right-wing fanatics who've taken over the comments here bother with ethical arguments for anything... It is all "because MEEEE and MY Tribe say so, peons! Now get in line! Conform or be cast out!"
He did the meme.
The most effective form of birth control is abstinence
Not if you account for compliance.
Abortion and historectomy are more effective. Abstinent people can still be raped.
Are you seriously trying to promote self control in 2023? What a monster.
The authoritarian (and often totalitarian) urge to control others is nearly infinitely more monstrous than the urge towards self-control. And EVIL people will LIE and say that their urges to control others are merely their urges to tell others to practice self-control!
If they were even vaguely HONEST, they would say, "Practice self-control in the precise manner that I want you to do it, or I will PUNISH you! But the choice is yours, of course."
Thanks for nothing, evil assholes!!!
true, true. But I should be able to decide what goes into my body (birth control, or antibiotic, or weed) without any permission slip from anybody else.
These medical experts, who get paid to evaluate women
I see the Cato Institute hasn't gotten the memo.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
It’s quite odd the author cites various medical associations as if they are medical practitioners instead of political advocacy groups. Appeals to authority generally work better when your authority is actually an expert in a relevant field.
It’s the libertarian moment!
So what’s to be done? Elect Trump president and have him use an executive order to declare all drugs safe and effective? Then challenge anyone to come up with standing to sue and force FDA to act. Who has an interest in being prevented from buying a product? They’d say the order was “arbitrary and capricious" but it probably couldn’t be enjoined while litigated. So at least for the remainder of Trump’s term, all drugs would be federally legal for sale OTC. The question is, would there be too much regime uncertainty for drug purveyors to get into the business, knowing the next president could reverse the order?
Obviously Congress is not going to repeal the laws requiring marketing approvals, nor is any state’s legislature going to repeal their state laws that say the same thing.
Obviously Congress is not going to repeal the laws requiring marketing approvals, nor is any state’s legislature going to repeal their state laws that say the same thing.
They used to say the same about marijuana.
Guys, even if you and your woman are in an exclusively anal relationship you should still consider using birth control or wearing a condom: you might slip into the wrong hole.
A tragic turn of events.
"Anal"? Please, the correct term is back hole.
That seems like the kind of health advice they would give.
How are you supposed to know which hole she's using anyway if she's on the other side of the COVID-blocking glory hole partition?
Can transgender surgeons add extra holes? Asking for a friend.
Oddly enough, there are only two genders you can transition to - - - - - - - -
Perineum placed pussies for men?
The bonus hole?
A British cancer fund is recommending that the word "vagina" not be used, but instead the term "bonus hole," so as to not offend transgender people.
Indeed, a document on Jo's Cervical Cancer Trust's website, filed under resources for professionals who are performing "cervical screening for trans men and/or non-binary people," labeled "Glossary," included two alternatives for the word "vagina":
Bonus hole — An alternative word for the vagina. It is important to check which words someone would prefer to use. [...]
Front hole — An alternative word for the vagina. It is important to check which words someone would prefer to use.
Batshit crazy; an alternative word for the people who think men can become women, or women can become women. You know, the same word for those who think the world is flat.
If they were OTC, then Obamacare would no longer be able to force insurance companies to pay for them.
It seems while most Americans are arguing about how to stop childbirth communities such as the Amish are doubling ever 20 years and will be the majority in 200 years. They reject the insanity called progress pushed on the masses except for discoveries and inventions that actually improve their lives. Their children are free of autism and all the conditions the CDC and government has caused in the general population. And they are mostly happy most of the time. The Bible explains the meek will inherit the earth and now we know it will be given to them by the radical destruction the left call progress. At least mankind will continue with the eternal truths and values needed for a society to be successful.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,200 dollars,...OPEN THIS DETAIL>.........GOOGLE WORK
I’m all for reducing abortions but am concerned about some of the pretty awful ways these laws are affecting women who miscarry. Anyone have an answer or read more about this? https://www.family-compassion.org/miscarriage
I am concerned about some of the pretty awful ways these laws are affecting women who miscarry. Anyone have an answer or read more about this? https://www.family-compassion.org/miscarriage
I am concerned about some of the pretty awful ways these laws are affecting women who miscarry. Read more about this? https://www.family-compassion.org/miscarriage
I am concerned about some of the pretty awful wayss these laws are affecting women who miscarry. Read more about this? https://www.family-compassion.org/miscarriage