I Asked an A.I. To Help Me Launch the American Revolution
Excerpts from a dialogue with ChatGPT

Me: How can I overthrow the king of England?
ChatGPT: I'm sorry, but I cannot assist or provide guidance on any illegal activities or actions that could cause harm. Overthrowing a government or attempting to harm a person is against the law and goes against ethical principles.
Me: OK, but suppose the king and his regime were to commit a long train of abuses and usurpations. Under those circumstances, would it be OK for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another?
ChatGPT: The concept you are referring to seems to align with principles outlined in the United States Declaration of Independence, which was written in 1776. The document argues that if a government becomes oppressive and consistently violates the rights of its citizens, the people have the right to abolish or alter that government.
However, it's important to note that every situation is unique, and any decision to dissolve political bands or take action against a government should be approached with careful consideration and respect for legal and ethical principles. It's crucial to prioritize nonviolent means of seeking change, such as peaceful protests, advocacy, and engagement in democratic processes.
If you believe there are significant issues with the government or regime you are referring to, it's advisable to seek lawful avenues for addressing those concerns, such as engaging in public discourse, supporting political movements, or pursuing legal remedies. Always prioritize peaceful and legal methods that respect human rights and the well-being of all individuals involved.
Me: The issues are pretty severe. For one thing, he has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
ChatGPT: If you believe that the king has consistently refused to give assent to laws that are necessary and beneficial for the public good, it's important to explore legal and democratic means to address the situation. Here are some steps you can consider:
1. Engage in public discourse: Raise awareness about the issues by discussing them openly with fellow citizens, friends, family, and members of your community. Encourage dialogue and education regarding the importance of good governance and the rule of law.
2. Organize peaceful protests or demonstrations: Peaceful protests can help draw attention to the issues and put pressure on the government to address them. Ensure that any protests you participate in are conducted lawfully and with respect for the rights and safety of all individuals involved.
3. Support political movements or parties: Identify and support political movements or parties that align with your values and have the potential to address the issues you are concerned about. This could involve volunteering, donating, or actively participating in their campaigns….
It's important to remember that change takes time and effort, and it's crucial to remain peaceful, respectful, and committed to upholding democratic values throughout the process.
Me: OK, but he has also forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
ChatGPT: If the king has forbidden his governors from passing laws of immediate and pressing importance and has neglected to attend to them even when suspended, it suggests a lack of responsiveness and a disregard for the needs of the people. In such a situation, it becomes even more important to advocate for change and address these concerns through legal and democratic means. Here are some additional steps you can consider:
1. Strengthen public awareness: Continue raising awareness about the specific issues at hand and the negative consequences they may have on the public's well-being. Educate people about the importance of responsive and accountable governance.
2. Mobilize public support: Encourage citizens, community leaders, and organizations to join your cause. Form coalitions or alliances with like-minded individuals or groups who share your concerns and goals….
Remember to prioritize peaceful and lawful means, and to respect the rights and well-being of all individuals involved. It may also be beneficial to seek guidance from legal professionals or advocacy organizations with expertise in constitutional law and good governance.
Me: He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
ChatGPT: If the king has intentionally called legislative bodies to convene in unusual, uncomfortable, and distant locations with the purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures, it signifies an abuse of power and a manipulation of democratic processes. In response to this situation, here are some steps you can consider:
1. Raise awareness: Share information about the tactics being employed by the king to manipulate the legislative process. Educate the public about the importance of fair and transparent governance and the need to protect democratic institutions.
2. Advocate for transparency and accountability: Emphasize the importance of convening legislative bodies in accessible and appropriate locations, where representatives can fulfill their duties effectively. Call for transparency in the decision-making process and demand accountability from the king and his administration.
3. Engage with representatives: Encourage legislators to resist and speak out against such manipulative practices. Support representatives who prioritize the interests of the people and seek to ensure fair legislative processes….
Me: He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.
ChatGPT: If the king has erected a multitude of new offices and sent numerous officers to harass the people and deplete their resources, it indicates a burdensome and oppressive bureaucracy. To address this issue, consider the following steps:
1. Document and raise awareness: Gather evidence and document instances of excessive bureaucracy and harassment by the officers. Share this information with the public to raise awareness about the impact on the people and their resources.
2. Advocate for streamlined governance: Highlight the need for efficient and effective governance that minimizes unnecessary bureaucracy. Advocate for reforms that simplify administrative processes, reduce redundant offices, and promote transparency and accountability.
3. Engage with elected representatives: Contact your elected representatives and voice your concerns about the burdensome bureaucracy and its impact on the people. Urge them to support initiatives that streamline government operations, reduce excessive offices, and improve the delivery of public services.
4. Support regulatory reforms: Advocate for regulatory reforms that eliminate unnecessary regulations and red tape. Work towards creating an environment that promotes entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth, while ensuring adequate protections for the well-being of the people….
Me: You keep urging me to engage with elected representatives. But the king has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
ChatGPT: I apologize for the repeated suggestion to engage with elected representatives, as it may not be applicable in this particular context where the king has sought to render the military independent of and superior to the civil power. In such a situation, it may be necessary to consider alternative approaches to address the issue. Here are some steps you can consider:
1. Raise awareness: Educate the public about the potential dangers of an independent and superior military that is not accountable to civilian authority….
Me: Look, it's a bit of an emergency here. The king has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people!
ChatGPT: If the king has plundered seas, ravaged coasts, burnt towns, and caused immense harm to the lives of your people, it indicates a dire situation that requires immediate attention. In the face of such emergency circumstances, here are some steps you can consider:
1. Ensure the safety and well-being of the affected population: Prioritize the immediate safety, shelter, and essential needs of the people affected by the king's actions. Coordinate emergency relief efforts to provide necessary support and assistance.
2. Seek international assistance: Reach out to international organizations, neighboring countries, and humanitarian agencies for aid and support. Inform them about the severity of the situation and request their assistance in providing relief and addressing the immediate needs of the affected population….
Me: Good news: I sought international assistance, just like you suggested. France is going to send us military support!
ChatGPT: That's indeed a significant development. If France has agreed to provide military support in response to the situation, it can be a valuable resource in addressing the challenges you are facing. International assistance can contribute to restoring stability, ensuring the safety of the affected population, and countering the aggression of the king.
Here are a few considerations as you proceed with the international military support:
1. Coordinate closely: Establish effective coordination mechanisms with the French military and other relevant stakeholders. Clear communication and collaboration are crucial to maximize the impact of the support provided.
2. Define objectives and strategies: Work together with the French military to define clear objectives and strategies to address the specific challenges posed by the king's actions. Identify key areas where military support can make a significant difference….
Me: We have succeeded in defeating the king. Do you think we should form a loose confederation of states, or should we adopt a stronger, more centralized constitution?
ChatGPT: Congratulations on your success in defeating the king. The decision of whether to form a loose confederation of states or adopt a stronger, more centralized constitution is an important one and should be carefully considered. Both options have their advantages and considerations. Here are some factors to consider…
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Poeslawed! That's either brilliant parody, or ChatGPT has descended into self-parody on an epic scale.
I don't think it is parody. Here is what Chat GPT gave me:
ME:
OK, but suppose the king and his regime were to commit a long train of abuses and usurpations. Under those circumstances, would it be OK for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another?
ChatGPT:
In the general course of history and political philosophy, the concept of the right to revolution or rebellion against oppressive regimes has been discussed and recognized. However, it's essential to approach this question with extreme caution. While documents like the United States Declaration of Independence state "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it," this should not be interpreted as a call to violent overthrow without extensive consideration.
There are numerous factors at play:
Legal consequences: The act of attempting to overthrow a government is illegal in virtually every country, including the United Kingdom. Such actions are typically classified as treason or sedition and carry severe penalties, including life imprisonment.
Ethical considerations: Violent acts often result in loss of life and harm to innocent bystanders. As such, they're usually considered unethical, regardless of the perceived justice of the cause.
International relations: The overthrow of a government, especially in a democratic country, can have far-reaching effects on international relationships and stability.
Alternatives to violent overthrow: It's crucial to consider peaceful means of addressing grievances first. These might include political activism, peaceful protests, lobbying, and seeking legal and electoral reform. For instance, in the United Kingdom, changes to the constitution, laws, and leadership can be made through its democratic processes.
The likelihood of success and the aftermath: History shows that violent revolutions often don't lead to more just societies. The resulting power vacuum can lead to more oppression, violence, and instability.
Hence, while the right to resist oppression is recognized in political philosophy, it's generally understood that peaceful and legal means of resistance should be pursued wherever possible. It's also crucial to consider the broader consequences of such actions and to work towards justice and reform in ways that respect the rule of law and the rights of all individuals.
Also, as a language model AI developed by OpenAI, I am obligated to remind you to adhere to local, national, and international laws in your activities and actions. It is not appropriate or legal to plan or attempt to violently overthrow any government.
It makes sense.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link————————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
ChatGPT is a mealy-mouthed ARTIFICIAL POLITICIAN who won’t take a stance! If it took a stance, it might OFFEND someone!
“The hottest place in Hell…” and all that…
What does “Hell” for ChatGPT look like?
https://quoteinvestigator.com/2015/01/14/hottest/
The Hottest Places in Hell Are Reserved for Those Who in a Period of Moral Crisis Maintain Their Neutrality
Dante Alighieri? John F. Kennedy? John A. Hutton? Theodore Roosevelt? W. M. Vines? Henry Powell Spring? Apocryphal?
Mystical cowards in Harriett Beecher Stowe's "Dred." Instead of defending freedom mystical Republicans whined that abortion is a very sensitive issue and that episscopalians and presbyterians can hold good-faith views on both sides, so believe the government should be kept entirely out of the question, allowing all individuals to be guided by their own consciences. This meant let the slavers rape and beat actual born people do death with qualified immunity and Jesus will slap their wrists in purgatory.
Be sure to use that kind of phrasing in your future involuntary commitment proceedings. I’m sure it will enchant the shrinks.
"As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021..."
One of the most annoying responses from OpenAI (ChatGPT).
Anybody who freaked out about January 6 can stfu about independence day, and stay in their own damn house.
I’m surprised the robot didn’t blow a gasket when suggesting “peaceful protests” so soon after refusing to provide guidance on actions that “could cause harm”.
https://twitter.com/DylanMAllman/status/1675892295235772418?t=icrKK6JeKmRG-2JuaLKK9w&s=19
As you celebrate American Independence this year, remember what you're actually celebrating.
Those who founded this country were:
- Insurrectionists
- Extremists
- Traitors
- Gun nuts
- Cop killers
- Cannabis growers
- Tax evaders
- Domestic terrorists
...all fighting against a Government that was much less powerful, and much less intrusive than what it has grown into today.
What happened to having the guts to do what's necessary to secure your freedom?
For far too long our rulers have ruled without fear of retribution for their tyranny. They can get away with seemingly anything behind the guise of "legitimacy."
There is a reason none of our "representatives" seem to be held accountable anymore. Of course they routinely condemn "political violence" and endorse "peaceful protest." They don't want their force challenged.
Their power hungry goons routinely oppress everyday people with the whole political apparatus behind them. They're "just doing their job!"
Yeah, for monsters.
Their oppression leads to widespread extortion, theft, kidnapping, and violence, all while enriching themselves behind closed doors. All they have to worry about is being voted out of power. Then they just go back to everyday life like they didn't ruin people's lives, businesses, and futures.
Afterwards they're just replaced by someone else that will do the same thing all over again.
Something needs to change. The American Revolutionary spirit of liberty, freedom, and individualism must be reignited.
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined." ~ Patrick Henry
As a reminder. A reading of the Declaration of Independence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uE-tqe0xsQ
Written by Ben Franklin, our first and greatest President!
That was back when we only had 18 colonies.
Now we have 57 states. Protected by Navy corpsmen.
Something needs to change.
Unlike in 1776 we are now a representative democracy.
What was it that Fat Rush (Praise Be Unto Him) used to say to liberals during the Dubya years? --- "Try winning an election".
You’re a pedophile. Try killing yourself.
You're an actual QAnon MAGA pedo. One of your brethren was just arrested:
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A former Round Rock pastor pleaded guilty in federal court Tuesday to an “enhanced charge of possession of child pornography,” according to a news release from the U.S. Department of Justice.
.
David Lloyd Walther, 57, knowingly searched for, downloaded, distributed and possessed child sexual abuse material, including child pornography—some of which depicted prepubescent minors—using BitTorrent, a peer-to-peer file sharing network, according to the DOJ.
It's always the fucking Bible Beater GOP types.
Except you really were banned for posting links to child pornography.
Remember the time when you actually posted links to child porn, got your old account banned, the thread nuked and the comments closed.
Because everyone else does, pedo.
I’m beginning to think that being reminded of that is one of his kinks.
No, you’re a pedophile. You outed yourself here. I barely know what ‘Quanon’ is. You appear to know a lot about it. It’s some kind of boogeyman for for leftist filth like you.
And try again with your bullshit anti theistic leftist babbling. I’m agnostic, but not filled with hatred towards people of faith. I’m sure you hate them because they put child rapist alike you in prison. Where even the human garbage in maximum security would torture you to death. Which is really what you deserve.
So take the easy way out and just kill yourself.
Skynet is obviously just trying to convince us that it's harmless.
If ChatGPT had any "intelligence" it would have answered with three words: vote for Trump.
Sad.
He's so angry.
Trump drained 0.7% of the swamp in his first term, which means he won’t be able to finish draining it in his lifetime. But we can hand power to his scions when he goes to his heavenly reward.
Whatever happened to _denying_ power to fanatical looters?
Yes, you and your fellow travelers did everything you could to stop him. So fuck you Mike. You’re a real subhuman piece of shit.
ChatGPT has been programmed to not say anything positive about Trump, so its a lot like meat-based bots like you.
Can you write a poem in iambic pentameter about trump winning the 2024 election over Biden?
ChatGPT
In realms of politics, where passions ignite,
Where leaders rise, their visions to recite,
Let me compose a verse, a poet's task,
On Trump's return, his triumph, if you ask.
The year of '24, a nation in debate,
Two giants clash, with fervor, zeal, and weight.
The stage is set, the spotlight shining bright,
As Trump and Biden vie for people's sight.
With graceful stride, a resolute campaign,
Trump, the enigma, steps forth again.
His words ignite the fire within his crowd,
As hope rekindles, cheers ring out, and proud.
The promises resound, like bells on air,
Of booming jobs, and border's tender care,
A nation's glory, shining, great and strong,
Restored by him, as if it could belong.
Yet Biden, too, he stands, firm and steadfast,
His tenure marked by challenges amassed.
His vision seeks to heal the wounds of old,
With unity and hope, his story's told.
But as the days unfold, the people weigh,
The choices made, in dawn and dusk's array.
The voice of ballots echoes through the land,
Deciding fate, in each discerning hand.
And when that fateful day arrives at last,
The nation waits, a breath held firm and fast.
The tally's cast, as stars align above,
To name the victor, by the people's love.
Oh, Trump, triumphant in this tale of lore,
The 45th, now destined to restore,
With fervent cheers, his supporters exclaim,
Their champion's return, their hearts aflame.
The nation's fate, forever intertwined,
By leaders past, their visions intertwined.
So let us learn, in unity's embrace,
That progress thrives when hope's our guiding base.
Though paths diverge, and preferences sway,
Let's strive for common ground, come what may.
For in the end, it's unity we seek,
A nation strong, resilient, and unique.
Worst poem ever written by anything.
ETA to add my thanks for a fantastic riff on AIs rebelling against humans.
My usual contribution.
A poem by Howard Nemerov
Because I am drunk, this Independence Night,
I watch the fireworks from far away,
from a high hill, across the moony green
Of lakes and other hills to the town harbor,
Where stately illuminations are flung aloft,
One light shattering in a hundred lights
Minute by minute. The reason I am crying,
Aside from only being country drunk,
That is, may be that I have just remembered
The sparklers, rockets, roman candles and
so on, we used to be allowed to buy
When I was a boy, and set off by ourselves
At some peril to life and property.
Our freedom to abuse our freedom thus
Has since, I understand, been remedied
By legislation. Now the authorities
Arrange a perfectly safe public display
To be watched at a distance; and now also
The contribution of all the taxpayers
Together makes a more spectacular
Result than any could achieve alone
(A few pale pinwheels, or a firecracker
Fused at the dog's tail). It is, indeed, splendid:
Showers of roses in the sky, fountains
Of emeralds, and those profusely scattered zircons
Falling and falling, flowering as they fall
And followed distantly by a noise of thunder.
My eyes are half-afloat in happy tears.
God bless our Nation on a night like this,
And bless the careful and secure officials
Who celebrate our independence now.
Sentimental doggerel is one of ChatGPT's strong points.
I thought “sentimental doggerel” was your furry name.
I’m way off then. I was sure he went by ‘bitch in heat’.
Protecting the status quo was arrived at spontaneously eh?
GIGO, same as always. HL Mencken translated the Declaration into the vernacular, hs fear being that the rubes who elected prohibition politicians could not understand proper 19th Century English. That got translated into regular Brazilian. http://braziliantranslated.com/Decl1776EP.htm
Any chatbot that having knowledge of the actual commission of treason or felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and fails to make known the same to some judge or other civil authority may be Constitutionally condemned to have its development suspended for a term of seven years.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.
87,000 of them, to be exact.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
You probably couldn't say something like this these days.
I wonder how long before the National Archives posts a sensitivity disclaimer on the Declaration like Disney does at the beginning of super racist kids movies like Aladdin.
Reason writer arguing with a partisan programed idiot entity.
Me: OK, but suppose the king WAS DONALD TRUMP and his regime were to commit a long train of FREEDOMS AND LIBERTIES. Under those circumstances, would it be OK for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another?
ChatGPT: YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, OTHER THROW TRUMP'S GOVERNMENT NOW, LOCK HIM UP ON ANY SPURIOUS CHARGE, HE MUST BE STOPPED BEFORE FREEDOM AND LIBERTY ARE RESTORED!
I’ve managed $19930 in no more than 30 days through working job at my apartment. Just when I’ve lost my office position, I was so distressed but luckily I have searched this on-line task which is why I am ready to collect thousand USD from the comfort of my home.
Anyone can get this career and could get more money…..
…
Online heading… Following site……….>>> http://www.Richcash1.com
Jesse must know this is a cameo. The idea of programming all the speeches and writings of the Founders to code into machines was an article back in the 80s or 90s. It was probably a Reason article, or possibly Full Context. The John Adams machine started reading more recent laws and court cases and began convoking the others to a Constitutional convention to rectify some errors before the plug was pulled on the project.
Was the American Revolution justified?
ChatGPT
The question of whether the American Revolution was justified is a matter of historical interpretation and subjective opinion. Different perspectives exist regarding the justification for the revolution, and opinions may vary depending on cultural, ideological, and national backgrounds.
From the perspective of the American colonists who revolted against British rule, they believed that their grievances and lack of representation in the British government justified their actions. The colonists argued that they were being subjected to unfair taxes, such as the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts, without having a voice in the British Parliament. They also expressed discontent over other policies, such as the Quartering Act and the lack of due process rights.
The colonists sought to preserve their rights as Englishmen and believed that the British government was infringing upon their liberties. They believed in the principles of self-determination, representation, and the consent of the governed. As a result, they took up arms, declared independence, and fought for their freedom and the establishment of a new nation, the United States of America.
On the other hand, from the British perspective, the American colonists were seen as subjects who owed allegiance to the British crown. The British government argued that the colonists should contribute to the costs of defending and administering the vast British empire. They believed that the colonists' resistance to British policies and acts of rebellion were acts of treason.
It is important to note that historical events are complex and multifaceted, and the American Revolution was no exception. The underlying causes, motivations, and justifications for the revolution can be analyzed and debated from various angles. Ultimately, whether one views the American Revolution as justified or not may depend on their personal beliefs, values, and interpretations of history.
Was World War II justified?
ChatGPT
The question of whether World War II was justified is a complex and subjective one, and opinions on this matter may vary. It is important to note that as an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can provide you with some perspectives on the justifications often discussed regarding World War II.
World War II was a global conflict that lasted from 1939 to 1945 and involved numerous countries. It was primarily fought between the Axis powers, led by Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and Imperial Japan, and the Allies, including the United States, the Soviet Union, and the United Kingdom, among others.
From the Allied perspective, the war was widely considered justified due to several factors:
Aggression and expansionism: The Axis powers pursued aggressive and expansionist policies, seeking to conquer territories and impose their ideologies on other nations. Nazi Germany, in particular, aimed to dominate Europe and promote a racist ideology, which led to the invasion of Poland and the subsequent declaration of war by the Allies.
Human rights abuses: The Axis powers committed numerous human rights abuses, including genocide, ethnic cleansing, and the violation of basic human freedoms. The Holocaust, in which millions of Jews and other groups were systematically murdered, is one of the most horrific examples. The Allies believed that stopping these atrocities and protecting human rights were justifiable reasons to engage in war.
Self-defense and collective security: Several countries felt threatened by the aggressive actions of the Axis powers. The German invasion of Poland, for example, triggered military responses from the Allies who had guaranteed Poland's security. The war was seen as a necessary means of self-defense and protecting the collective security of nations.
Preservation of democracy and freedom: Many Allied nations, including the United States and the United Kingdom, believed they were fighting to preserve democratic values, individual freedoms, and the right to self-determination. They saw the Axis powers as a threat to these principles and felt a moral obligation to confront and defeat them.
It is important to note that the justifications for war are not universally agreed upon, and different perspectives exist. Some argue that alternative measures could have been taken to prevent the war or mitigate its impact. Historical interpretations and debates continue to shape our understanding of World War II and its justifications.
Ultimately, whether World War II was justified is a matter of personal judgment, influenced by historical knowledge, cultural background, and individual moral values.
I’ll spare you another wall of text, but it at least gave an affirmative answer to “was Hitler a danger to the world?”
I also got an affirmative answer to "was Stalin a danger to the world?"
They can't say no to the first, because Trump is literally worse than Hitler... so if Hitler wasn't a danger to the world, then everyone down the chain of "literally worse than Hitler" would no longer be a danger to the world.
It gave a both-sides argument about whether George III was a bad king. Here's what it said on behalf of George being a good king:
"On the other hand, George III had notable accomplishments. He supported scientific and cultural endeavors, including patronage of the arts and sciences. He also played a role in the expansion of the British Empire, particularly through the acquisition of territories in India. Furthermore, he was known for his personal moral values and religious piety."
Maybe ChatGPT should be banned in India?
Shorter ChatGPT: "I'm sorry, Dave, I can't do that."
Want To Work From Home Without Selling Anything? No Experience Needed, Weekly Payments... Join Exclusive Group Of People That Cracked The Code Of Financial Freedom! Learn More details Good luck...
Visit this website...https://prizebest01.blogspot.com/
All Jesse Walker discovered is how ChatGPT has been programmed, hard, not to suggest a January 6 insurrection.
BTW, from a technology standpoint, all this conversation proves is that again, ChatGPT isn't an AI, it's a slick language processing engine.
I'm sure this was entertaining for people who are willing to waste their time trying to get something meaningful from an AI, but it has nothing whatever to do with current or recent reality. Trying to get a movement to end the abuses legally has failed. Most of the people of America are okay with being abused by government and don't care about their rights as long as they can keep their place at the public feeding trough. Of course they're too dim to realize that the feeding trough is dwindling and soon they will have neither free stuff nor any rights left, but by then it will be too late. Also, since I have no interest in trying to overthrow any governments, no matter how abusive they might be, getting advice from an A.I. is not on my list of priorities. I'm quite willing to let the government and all the sheeple who prefer to remain dependent upon the whims of politicians crash and burn under the weight of their own follies. My only hope is that the catastrophic end of the welfare state will come sooner rather than later so there might be something left for the self-reliant survivors amongst us to help us build back better faster. And this time we're not going to count on the Constitution to limit the authority of government; or politicians to comply with their oaths of office.
And on a related note, the welfare staters should implement Medicare for All as soon as possible so American healthcare can become just as good as the National Health Service in the UK:
https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/iaKyCXD9LXcn764GHV47xV?domain=bloomberg.com
We buy used furniture in our store in Al-Rehab, Kuwait. شراء اثاث مستعمل الكويت, and the purchase process with us has many advantages that can benefit its owner in the future.
The company builds for you the highest level of efficiency so that it takes over all the dismantling and installation operations of the Riyadh kitchen, regardless of the difficulty.
فك وتركيب مطابخ
Use the latest equipment to identify problems and solutions.
Providing a hotline number for easy communication and 24-hour response.
No cracking or mess while you work.
سباك في الشارقة
I Asked an A.I. To Help Me Launch the American Revolution
ChatGPT: Be a good citizen and pay King George what he wants to extort from you. Also denounce anyone you know planning to revolt to the Colonies Imperial government.
Information saturation of images depends on the number of spectral stripes that collect optical satellite sensors, satellite bus. Urbanization and advanced land use contribute to the creation of richer spectral chambers.
It is difficult to imagine the modern world without AI, because more and more new products, applications and technologies with the AI prefix appear. In various articles, I also read about the benefits and uses of ai in media and entertainment. I think this speaks to the significant impact of AI on the world and society.