Resourceful Indigenous Kids Survive 40 Days in Amazon Jungle
In the U.S., we arrest parents who let their 8-year-olds walk half a mile.

Emergency workers recently rescued four siblings between the ages of 1 and 13 who had survived in the jungles of Colombia for 40 days after their plane crashed. Much of the public responded with considerable dumbstruck awe: How could kids that young be that resourceful?
"My response is: They do this routinely," says anthropologist David Lancy, author of Child Helpers: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, and other books about kids in other cultures. "They look after their brothers and sisters, including babies. They hunt. They forage. They build shelters."
In short: They put us to shame.
The children—Lesly (13), Soleiny (9), Tien (4), and Cristin, who had his first birthday during this ordeal—were traveling with their mother, uncle, and a pilot on a small plane when its engine died. It crashed into one of the most remote regions of the Amazonian jungle on May 1.
Their mother survived for four days. After that, with all the adults dead, the kids were on their own in a forest filled with poisonous plants, venomous snakes, ravenous jaguars, and about 16 hours of rain each day—and that's not to mention drug traffickers and militias.
When searchers reached the plane 16 days after it crashed, they assumed all aboard had died, until one asked: Where are the bodies of the children?
When the team realized the kids had survived, the Colombian government organized a massive search. It began with members of the military, but soon they were joined by 200 local indigenous people. Normally, the two groups are mortal enemies. But on this mission, more than 300 people worked as a team.
The search was made difficult by the density of the forest canopy, which lets in little light. The near-constant rain made it almost impossible to follow tracks or yell loudly enough for the kids to hear. The searchers played tapes of the children's grandmother telling the kids that adults were looking for them. They also dropped 10,000 leaflets giving the kids encouragement and advice.
It's unclear whether they needed any.
By all accounts, 13-year-old Lesly took charge. She was raised by her grandmother in a remote village and learned to cook at age 8. When her parents were off working, she often took care of her siblings.
After the kids ate a sack of cassava flour they salvaged from the plane, Lesly led them off to hunt and gather. They took with them some clothes, a tarp, mosquito netting, a flashlight, and a music box.
In the jungle, they collected water in a soda bottle and ate avichure (something like passion fruit) and milpesos (which supposedly taste like avocados). They hid in tree trunks to avoid predators; Lesley made shelters from branches held together with hair ties.
Searchers traversed over 900 miles looking for the children, at one point passing within 200 feet of them. In the end, the kids were found about four miles from the crash.
When children grow up in indigenous cultures, far from modern anything, they learn the skills of life "by practice, observation, paying attention, listening, not being the center of attention, and being under an obligation from birth to help out and aspire to be like the adults," says Lancy.
Meanwhile, in our country, we legally prevent kids from developing that resourcefulness. Our authorities investigate and sometimes even arrest parents who let their children walk half a mile or spend six minutes alone in the library.
This wild overestimation of danger and underestimation of kids goes so deep that the American Academy of Pediatricians (AAP) put out a white paper a few years ago with this warning: "Young children have developmental limitations that prevent them from being safe pedestrians."
Thanks to all those limitations, the AAP "recommends that children should not be unsupervised pedestrians before 10 years of age, except in limited situations."
I'm guessing those limited situations do not include 40 days unsupervised in the jungle.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Google is offering all people $179 per-hour, besides, benefit of weekly income ... any individual can also avail this work!!!... Google doesn't have restrictions like age or some computer skill therefore you may try too.I have obtained $20K only in 14 days. Check here what I do>>>>>>> http://Www.Easywork7.com
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.SalaryApp1.com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
An easy and quick way to make money online by working part-time and earning an additional $15,000 or more. by working in my spare time in 1ce85 In my previous month (bgr-03), I made $17250, and this job has made me very happy. You can try this right now by following the instructions here
.
.
.
Check Profile______ Onlineclickweb.com
Ok, that library one is fucking insane. I used to ride my bicycle -- by myself -- to the library and spend hours there. When I was six. What the fuck.
Also, good on those kids. I'm pretty sure I couldn't have done that at thirteen. Or probably even thirty.
Easily start receiving more than $600 every single day from home in your part time. i made $18781 from this job in my spare time afte my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page.
.
.
Apply Now Here—————————->>> https://Www.Coins71.Com
I'm not exactly sure where you grew up but, to be fair, they had a lot of luck. Not the least of which being crashing in a region of the world where, pretty much all year gallons upon gallons of fresh water literally falls from the sky and it virtually never gets cold enough to induce hypothermia. I spent a lot of time growing up in a region of the the country that would be called relatively moderate internally to the US, and pretty much every winter had at least two weeks of weather of which any given day would've killed every last one of them and any given summer would've had 1-2 weeks if not a month where *a* soda bottle meant pretty much everybody except maybe one person was going to die. Regardless of poisonous plants or predators.
But, of course, being inhabited by evil, backwards, brutally oppressive descendants of white Europeans, it was also a place where it was pretty unfathomable for anyone not deliberately hiding to go missing for 40 days without being found. Even dead, within about 4 miles of your last known location, you would be exceedingly likely to be found in 40 days.
Six months ago I lost my job and after that I was fortunate enough to stumble upon a great website which literally saved me. I started working for them online and in a short time after I've started averaging 15k a month... The best thing was that cause I am not that computer savvy all I needed was some basic typing skills and internet access to start.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)>>> https://www.Salarybiz.com
Kids used to learn basic survival skills in Scouts. Don’t know if they still do.
They learn all the colors of the rainbow, and how to transition instead.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35,700 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,700 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link----------------------------------------->>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
The scouts are just a skinsuit now.
You have two paths in the scouts. One is going to an Eagle Mill, where your kid will be deemed an Eagle Scout by age 14, having completed all the skills, but having retained pretty much nothing while getting a decent checkbox added to their college resume.
The other is to spend some time in the scouts, which means probably foregoing some other high school activities that many parents want on their kids’ resume. In the scouts they will spend learn the same stuff as the Eagle Mill kids, but they will practice it enough for most of it to stick.
And the great thing is that both boys and girls can do this, if they choose. I have found that the girls in our troop are more likely to be Eagle Mill types, but there are still plenty of them that stick around and participate regularly in the affiliated Venturing Crew when they age out of the Scouts program.
Far be it from being a “Skin Suit” the boys and girls in our scouts are getting everything out of it that they seek. And this is in California where I have every reason to be skeptical of any institution.
I wouldn't agree with wholly "skin suit", but I can understand the sentiment. I would say that the combination of woke morality with COVID has broken a lot of things. And I say that as someone with two broodlings currently prepping for Philmont.
And I will say the addition of girls has made me understand the agoge better. There's an old saying "back room" or hushed saying in Scouts about the "3 vapors", "3 As", or "3 Gs"... bringing along one of the 3 Gs or vapors to 'every' campout, regardless of but especially for the fact that the Gs, per your description, tend to veer in the Eagle Mill direction, doesn't help the rest of the issue.
I completely understand that would fit the prototype of what many would conceptually regard as a male chauvinist now and that I was biased going in but, again, we have always run our Pack family-friendly and I agree with that, but I've seen first hand in the Troop and am pretty convinced by the numbers that while the inclusion of girls is by no means bad, it hasn't done the program, either program Boy or Girl Scouts, any good on several fronts.
As an old Eagle scout myself, I don't understand what are the 3 vapors, and the As and Gs???
Unless you went on to being a Scout leader, being an Eagle Scout kinda inherently biases you to not knowing. They're, sort of, a 'dark triad' of Scouting. Behavioral symptoms indicative of a Scout who didn't, hasn't, or probably won't Eagle or even age out in the program:
Vapors: Gasoline, Perfume, Smoke
Gs: Gas, Girls, Grass/Ganja
As: Automobiles, Ass, Alcohol
Sports, school, Church, and other extracurricular activities you can schedule around, have leaders you can or even do work with, and aren't exactly incompatible with (Boy) Scouts.
This isn't to denote, as I indicated, that any/all of these are bad, morally wrong, or should be abolished (no part of the dark triad is itself inherently pathological), just that they represent a set of intrinsic or immutable and largely incompatible 'distractions' or dis-inclinations from Scouting. Like if you're a fitness trainer who has clients who shows up and describe themselves as a foodie, gamer, and movie nerd rather than a nature lover, sports nerd, social butterfly, maker/DIYer, philately, aviation enthusiast, or whatever. The other activities require you to be up and about and doing something other than cramming food in your face but those three, together, specifically require you to be eating and sedentary.
To the specific 'G' in question: I've been at Summer Camps for the better part of the last decade and watched both the entire camp and individual Troops, including my boys' own, before and after girls. Again, in dark triad psych/epidemiological fashion, you can witness a troop go from a solid week of swimming, metalworking, fishing, etc. to ambling around after each other in the woods. There are ways that it could work, but the way Scouts was integrated (which I opposed at the time with specific examples and a general sense of foreboding of these exact things), there was, and still is, no structure, guidance, program, or even underlying logic or ethos to it. Somewhat akin to the way trannies are being integrated into girls and women's sports now. I/we teach our Scouts a measure of chivalry and/or manners, but the Scouts program is *entirely* devoid of anything remotely resembling it.
Thanks for the reply. I think the common thread of all three categories is that they are markers of the cool kids, or rebellious kids, which are traits that I wouldn't say are common in scouting. In my outdated experience, I would be surprised to see those types involved at all, especially not in large enough quantities for there to be discussions of their categories, but maybe the participating groups have changed.
Kids can also learn these skills with siblings, neighborhood kids, and just by themselves, without falderal, uniforms, God-talk, and risk of sexual abuse either from Scoutmasters or Clergy in religious Scout groups.
Of course they are statistically more likely to be abused by older siblings, neighborhood adults than in the scouts. But what the fuck, we've got an axe to grind so let's go at it.
I know it’s not one of Jesus’ parables so it doesn’t really apply to good and evil and, by the same purely and rigidly logical tokens, is beyond atheists' reproach, but you really have to wonder whether the Emperor was truly ignorant of the fact that he wore no clothes or whether he really got off on exposing himself to *and* corrupting the minds of children.
The Parables made more sense than that.
Right, the Emperor and (some of) his court not having the least fucking clue what’s going on is kinda intrinsic to the story.
I know the story. It's your gibberish about it that is indecypherable. Perhaps Hank can translate.
Got some wood to chop to provide the firelight?
Still waiting on the wood. Somebody else tried arguing that with me in the past and provided articles, but the articles didn't prove their point.
Free range kids!
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Unless you have entry on Survival Barter, no!
Another great Lenore article. One mistake: in South America, "indigenous peoples," "drug traffickers" and "militias" usually refer to the same folks. What changes is who's talking, brainwashed foreigners or locals.
Raising indigneous children: https://aeon.co/essays/why-runa-indigenous-people-find-natural-parenting-so-strange