More States Are Using Science-Backed Reading Instruction. It Shouldn't Have Taken This Long.
Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana have all seen dramatic improvements in reading scores by investing in "science-based" reading instruction.

In 2019, two-thirds of American fourth-graders scored below "proficient" in reading in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) test. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, scores declined again, reaching a 30-year low. However, despite a widespread national literacy problem among American schoolchildren, several states have managed to stave off the dramatic declines in test scores that plagued other states.
Since 2013, Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana have all passed legislation mandating that teachers be trained in the "science of reading"—methods that typically center around phonics, an approach in which children are taught to read words by decoding the sounds that different letters or groups of letters make. Since these policies' implementation, reading performance in these states has dramatically improved, even though reading scores there have historically been among the lowest in the nation.
This stands in sharp contrast to the popular, though discredited, "balanced literacy"—also known as the "whole language" or "three cueing"—method, which concentrates on having children read whole words instead of sounding out letters. This method also teaches children to guess when they come across an unfamiliar word, using context clues like the word's first letter or the pictures in the book.
The idea that children learn to read by using context, rather than decoding words, was first challenged in the 1970s with a series of studies that found that skilled readers rarely rely on context at all. Instead they "very quickly recognize a word as a sequence of letters. That's how good readers instantly know the difference between 'house' and 'horse,' for example," journalist Emily Hanford summarizes. In fact, Hanford notes, "Experiments that force people to use context to predict words show that even skilled readers can correctly guess only a fraction of the words."
While balanced literacy was widely discredited decades ago, it has remained incredibly popular in American schools. According to Hanford, the continued use of balanced literacy–based reading curricula plays a large role in America's current literacy crisis.
"Most teachers nationwide are not being taught reading science in their teacher preparation programs because many deans and faculty in colleges of education either don't know the science or dismiss it," Hanford noted in an episode of the Educate podcast. "As a result of their intransigence, millions of kids have been set up to fail."
But some states have charted a different course. Mississippi passed the Literacy-Based Promotion Act in 2013, requiring thousands of teachers to undergo training in science-based reading instruction. The law also required intensive screening to test if kids are having reading difficulties, even mandating that children be held back if they aren't reading at grade level by the end of the third grade.
Following its implementation, Mississippi's test scores skyrocketed. According to the Associated Press, in 2013, the state was ranked 49th in fourth-grade reading. In 2022, it ranked 21st. Low-income students saw particularly great benefits. The state went from ranking as one of the worst states in the country for low-income fourth-graders in 2013 to second in the nation in 2022.
Alabama and Louisiana followed suit with similar legislation in 2019 and saw their own gains in performance. In 2019, Alabama ranked 49th among low-income fourth graders, and in 2022, it ranked 27th. Louisiana was ranked 42nd in 2019 and is now 11th. Both states, according to the A.P., actually saw modest gains in reading scores during the pandemic.
And the science-based reading trend is catching on. According to the A.P., Tennessee, North Carolina, Georgia, Kentucky, and Virginia have all adopted similar reading policies in recent months.
Despite the clear evidence that phonics-based instruction is effective, it's taken years for schools to implement those teaching practices. Public schools don't face much competition, meaning they aren't incentivized to improve their practices. As a result, a generation of American schoolchildren has been taught to read using an ineffective method. The improvements in states like Mississippi are encouraging, but it shouldn't have taken this long for the trend to catch on.
"The problem is that the schools are run by a bureaucratic government monopoly, largely isolated from competitive or community pressures," wrote David Boaz, a distinguished senior fellow of the Cato Institute, last year. "We expect good service from businesses because we know— and we know that they know—that we can go somewhere else…. You can bet that if schools had to depend on satisfying customers, there wouldn't be many that decided to skip phonics."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So it looks like State Mandates to enforce curriculums is a good thing, right? So Reason no longer has a problem with DeSantis banning the pushing of CRT or Queer Studies in K-12 schools?
That’s the first thing that occurred to me. I don’t know if Emma Camp was one of the Reason contributors that was against state curricula rules, but it would be interesting to have those writers comment on this article. Especially since mandating instruction is much stronger than forbidding it.
To my knowledge Ms Camp, who is kind of new, was not part of that camp. Generally this has been the domain of Shackford. Though I will note that even Soave previously criticized DeSantis for a state ban on Mask/Vaccine mandates in public schools (which to me seems to be very similar to this case).
"Especially since mandating instruction is much stronger than forbidding it"
I would disagree here. Mandating instruction always comes at the cost of something else. And forbidding almost always is a hidden mandate. "You cannot teach that the Holocaust is a myth!" is not substantially different from mandating that teaching the Holocaust was real. This is what happens in zero sum games like this.
Cash generating easy and fast method to work part time and earn an extra $15,000 or even more than this online. By working in my spare time I made $17990 in my previous month and I am very happy now because of this job. you can try this now by following
the details here...... http://Www.Smartjob1.com
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
Little Emma has been on staff for less than a year. For her deficits, being culpable for long time Reason stupidity isn’t one of them.
T t t t today, Junior!
Phonics. I had a phonics book and studied them. Also followed the sermon on Sunday, matching the print with the biblical readings. Learned to read quickly this way. Always scored high on basic skills, several grades ahead typically.
Yes, it sounds like they’re going back to phonics. And weren’t the democrats in government education the ones responsible for abandoning phonics in the first place?
And yet modern American citizens are not any better at being citizens now than they were back when they could read efficiently. It suggests to me that the premise of public education systems in America - that we all benefit from well-educated citizens as a justification for mandatory public education - is false and self-serving.
The original premise of education in America was to emulate the Prussian Model- to produce the new cogs for the American Machine. Rather than the disorder of millions of kids learning different things and valuing different things- especially those kids going to catholic schools and learning to work for the Pope- Those who pushed the public school system wanted children shaped to their patriotic vision of America.
That vision has changed a bit- the Patriotic Working American vision has become Woke Working Global Citizen, but the process is the same.
Historically, public education served as a ladder out of poverty for a number of ethnic groups. Including Blacks…before the Progressive Establishment undermined the system by abandoning basics for more exciting adventures in propaganda and pseudo-psychiatry.
I don’t insist that the Progressive Establishment is virulently racist against Blacks, just that if they were it’s hard to see what more they could be doing.
“… reading performance in these states has dramatically improved, even though reading scores there have historically been among the lowest in the nation.” Someone needs a lesson on the difference between absolute levels and changes at the margin.
Now, Emma, let's discuss the Chicago Public Schools where a mere 23% graduated can read at grade level, and a mere 21% can do math at grade level.
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/chicago-public-schools-hit-record-graduation-rate-as-math-reading-scores-drop/
In spring 2022, CPS leaders boasted of a record-high graduation rate after the four-year graduation rate increased by nearly 3 percentage points between 2021 and 2022. But just 23% of students in the graduating class of 2022 could read at grade level as juniors during the 2020-2021 school year. About 21% could perform math proficiently.
One academic year later, 83% of those students who had entered 9th grade in fall 2018 graduated. Nearly 85% who entered 9th grade in fall 2017 graduated.
During the same school year in which about 83% of students who completed high school in four years graduated, nearly 80% of current CPS 11th-grade students failed to meet proficiency in reading and math.
Now, ITL, lets discuss the education of the Donald's base in Queens.
City College Jamaica Plain boasts a four year graduation rate of 4.7%.
CF The Chronicle of Higher Education
https://www.chronicle.com/article/whose-pandemic-era-graduation-rates-beat-or-fell-below-the-average
Which is all run by democrats. From the bottom to the top.
Baltimore is as bad if not worse. Yet no one seems to care. The crime rate in those two cities is nearly out of control. So who do the people of Chicago elect as the next Mayor? A neo-Marxist who's as soft on crime if not easier than Beetlejuice. Baltimore effectively has no leadership at all.
Test scores continue to avalanche.
WE had science-based reading before we got the modern reading movements. Some academics wanted to improve on phonics, They didn't imiprove anythinig but refused to admit the mistake while millions became functionally illiterate. That wrong turn lasted almost 30 years.
My grandmother was a teacher fighting the same whole-word shit back in the 70s.
You are correct. What this article calls "science based reading" actually means doing what worked for CENTURIES before self proclaimed "scientists" tried to change what worked.
French cognitive neuroscientist Stanislas Dehaene wrote, “We do not regnocize a pirtned word through a hoslitic grapsing of its cotnours, because our brain beraks it down into ltteers and graphemes.”
Another cognitive neuroscientist, Mark Seidenberg, says that learning to sound-out atypical words such as have (/h/-/a/-/v/) helps the student to comprehend other words such as hive because of the meanings they have in common.
The idea that phonics is the only or the best way to learn English or communicate in English is like saying ENG US “QWERTY” Keyboards are the only way to type proficiently.
FFS Boomers, GTFO! It’s like saying the reason ChatGPT can ‘understand’ and write so well is because it’s really good at recognizing ‘a’ makes the /a/ sound.
People are not saying that phonics is the best or only way to learn english. They are saying it is a proven way to learn to read, which is better than the experimental forms in fad over the past several decades.
Your examples from neuroscientists don't conflict with that view either.
Your examples from neuroscientists don’t conflict with that view either.
Did you read the second quote?
The phonics vs. whole language is a false dichotomy and the (false) dominance of phonics is due to the low-transparency (complex mapping of graphemes to phonemes) of English. Prior to about 1850, whole language was *the* science-backed method of learning
Englishto read.And I didn't say anyone said "phonics is the best or only way to learn english", I said, "The idea that phonics is the only or the best way to learn English or communicate in English is like saying ENG US “QWERTY” Keyboards are the only way to type proficiently."
Yes, we all know that humans are very good at pattern recognition, and can generally adapt to shifting spellings to the point where you can start a text in standard English, and transition to something that's totally mixed up, and people can plow through it anyway.
That doesn't mean you don't need to know how to spell to properly use written language, when a huge number of words have similar spellings.
If you think learning to read is difficult for some, you should try learning Morse code. I took a class in amateur radio and learning Morse code could really put you to the ropes.
The idea of recognizing letter groups instead of dots and dashes was the only way to learn it.
General Class license required 15 words a minute.
Returning to the science backed way?
I ask for informtion's sake, and not as an argument for either side of the phonics/whole-word debate—
If phonics is demonstrably superior, why has its adoption been so slow? Even granted that school administrators have little or no stake in how much or how little their students learn, what sort of incentive do they have to resist the replacement of whole-word by phonics?
I'd ask, as well, why local school boards haven't been able to require phonics in their schools. However, I suspect that I know the answer to that one—the performance with which most local board members are chiefly concerned is athletic, not academic. School boards, and the voters who elect them, are more interested in whether the football team goes to State than in whether little Bobby knows the difference between "its" and "it's".
Phonics- sounding out words- used to be how most kids learned to read in the US. What happened is that we have tons of people going into college and then having jobs producing shoddy science and theories. There is a replication crisis in science because people are very bad at experimental design.
And like the obese person who is forever looking for the magic bullet that will finally let them lose weight, school systems, administrators and teachers are all looking for magic bullets for teaching kids. That is why every year in the list of grants for my public school foundation, I am reviewing requests for smart whiteboards, software and myriad other new-fangled devices to teach kids how to read, despite the fact that children 40 years ago were learning BETTER on chalk boards.
Phonics instruction is incredibly boring for teachers. The result is that there is a constant pressure on administrators, coming from teachers, for the adoption and retention of non-phonics curricula.
Same problem going on in K-12 math education. We've known how to successfully teach math for over a century, but we keep getting things like "new math" coming down the pike, even though they don't work well.
Year after year teaching the same basically mechanical skill by rote is incredibly boring for teachers, and so they're subject to fads that tell them what they want to hear: That there's a new and better way to teach it, to relieve their tedium for a while.
It's a bit easier in the classes like history or English, because the subject matter is more varied, so the temptation to mix it up isn't as strong.
More States Are Using Science-Backed Reading Instruction.
Well it sure wasn't Obama's Common Core! LOL
The educational program that destroyed education.
By design.
How do those who learned to read by the phonic method compare in spelling tests to those taught by whole word?
Wait, I thought all the public schools already taught based on The Science. Isn't that why we had to close the schools and let kids learn to read at home by watching Wheel of Fortune?
For decades public education has been focused on teaching kids what to think, not how to think.
It's even worse now. Thankfully governors such as DeSantis put a stop to it.
Until you learn to read, you can't really learn anything.
What's the difference between phonics and phonetics?
The former is a method of teaching, the latter is an approach to describing word sounds.
It's like the difference between teaching spelling, and an alphabet.
The purpose of 'whole language' and 'new math' by whatever obfuscatory name they're using is to make reading, math and visualization more difficult or impossible for the general public in order to force them to rely on authority figures for information and instruction.
Other things such as removing the ability to make logical connections in favor of convoluted memorized processes and history taught from the point of view of people who weren't involved in historical events save in the broadest sense (they were alive while the event occurred) further strip reasoning and historical knowledge all while adding the idea that being educated means being able to do what authority tells you to do.
Reason is, editorially and politically, openly on the side of whole language and new math in this debate, so why are they reporting on it?
Because this is one of a number of articles leftists have published in recent days to make the quiet changes in school systems more openly into a battleground.
The leftist view requires constant reinforcement and support to answer why reality isn't conforming to what leftists claim. Without a constant stream of lies, blame and bullshit, their narrative collapses quickly.
This means they really need to hold the schools.
The re-introduction of phonics is a warning klaxon that they're not.
Progressives don't want people literate. Literate people question Progressive scripture.
They want obedient workers. "The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out........Almost immediately he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable." H.L. Mencken
I believe phonics would have held me back. Starting with the third grade I read nearly every book for my age in a small public library. I read very fast because I read whole phrases at a time. Sitting there to sound out each syllable would have really set me back. Phonics would have ruined my reading which is my most important ability.
How about a requirement that all teachers of children must read at least one non-fiction book per month, and be able to write a paper on at least two of them per year.
Really, the best way to teach children how to read and write is to have their teachers practice what they preach.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,300 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,300 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Easily start receiving more than $600 every single day from home in your part time. i made $18781 from this job in my spare time afte my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page.
.
.
Apply Now Here———————————->>> https://Www.Coins71.Com