Agatha Christie Books Get Woke Makeover, Join Roald Dahl and Ian Fleming
Books by the acclaimed mystery author have been edited, ostensibly to comport with modern sensibilities.

The sensitivity readers have found another target: Agatha Christie.
Books by the acclaimed mystery author—who was born in the 19th century and passed away in 1976—have been edited, ostensibly to comport with modern sensibilities. "The new editions of Christie's works are set to be released or have been released since 2020 by HarperCollins, which is said by insiders to use the services of sensitivity readers," noted The Telegraph. "It has created new editions of the entire run of Miss Marple mysteries and selected Poirot novels."
As was the case with recent edits to the works of Roald Dahl and Ian Fleming, the changes hardly seem necessary; there are few readers clamoring for them. The sensitivity readers, who are hired to rewrite texts and prevent offense, are making the books less colorful and descriptive. In the original Death on the Nile, some characters were described as Nubian—as in the ethnic group from the region of Nubia in northern Africa—but no longer. A character in The Mysterious Affair at Styles who was referred to as a Jew—because, well, he is a Jew—is now just a person. And a servant identified as black no longer has a race at all.
It's one thing to change outdated ethnic references or references that specifically malign a specific race. Christie is no stranger to that: Her 1939 book, And Then There Were None, was originally published under the name Ten Little Niggers in the United Kingdom, where the racial slur was not as broadly offensive. (The book was named after a children's rhyme.)
It's quite another matter to delete all references to ethnicity because… why do it? Who is offended by knowing the race of a specific character? Should books cease acknowledging Africans, Jews, and Indians?
The great irony is that many progressives are correctly outraged about Republican attempts to remove references to LGBT characters in public schools and libraries; critics have characterized these bills, like the one in Florida, as "Don't Say Gay" legislation. A similar law that restricts racial content in schools prompted a publisher to delete references to Rosa Parks' race due to compliance concerns. This stuff from Republicans is idiotic; it's also a mirror version of precisely what book publishers are doing to Christie, Dahl, and others at the behest of woke literary scolds.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Every new religion, as it becomes ascendant, must wipe away all sign and memory of the old ways that came before it. It's a classic outcome, old as civilization itself.
Cowards hiding their heads in the sand.
Unable to face their own bigotry they erase what conflicts with their myopic world view.
We all turn away when Chris Rock taunts us with “niggers”. Some even applaud.
Yes, it's kind of like people who think Jews are somehow racist villainous money-lenders by genetics and culture, and are still looking for a 'final solution' after their failed ideology died in the early part of the last century.
I am making ????150 every hour by working on the web at home. A month ago I have gotten $19723 from this activity. This activity is exceptionally astounding and its normal income for me is superior to anything my past office work. This activity is for all and everyone can without much of a stretch join this correct now by utilize this link.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://salarycash710.blogspot.com/
Please outline how the Parental Rights Bill in FL is designed to remove references from gay characters in novels, you blithering nitwit
Gotta both sides, you know. Even if the references are bullshit.
Reason tries so hard to come across as even handed and "non partisan" [the exception being Trump because they just couldn't even...] that they often seem to tie themselves into knots over it.
The both-sidesism is insane because there's nobody doing the actual equivalent in the other direction. There's no right-wing push to edit Sherlock Holmes and make Moriarty a black man because they're offended at a white villain. There's no push to make a movie about Harriet Tubman starring a white actress. There's nobody advocated we rewrite "The Color Purple" to remove references to race.
It's called "gaslighting"
Amen! 100%
I was going to ask that question, but then I checked the author.
Of course, Robbie and every Reason writer knows that the parental rights bill is about explicit sexual references in kindergarten through third grade, but whataboutism knows no ages.
The K-3 bit has already been exposed as a lie. The "appropriate" part is also quickly being exposed as a smoke screen, when it's clear TPTB don't think much of anything is appropriate.
Just gotta think to yourself, "Which is worse?"
A: Preventing books from being sold/borrowed in certain venues
B: Rewriting those books so they can be placed in certain venues
C: Prevent certain books from being published/distributed at all because the content is offensive.
If one team only did A and the other team did all 3, if given the choice I would probably want to support the former against the latter.
"Ten Little Niggers"
Now there's a fucking classic for you.
Seriously, I have a trove of books by Hemingway, Steinbeck, Vonnegut, Faulkner, etc. No way I am going to get rid of any of them.
I'm going to start hitting up second hand book stores and start a collection.
This is why the KULTURE WARZ are important.
I’m going to start hitting up second hand book stores and start a collection.
Probably not a bad idea. Changing new editions is just step one. It's not that hard to believe that they'll start destroying as many old, non-woke editions as they can get their grubby little hands on.
Same reason why it's a good idea to have physical media of older movies too.
Probably not a good idea either. Before you know it, the mechanical hound will be outside your door and the fire department will burn it all down.
Buy them with cash, while cash still exists.
That's why you pay cash (while that's still an option) and don't tell anyone you're hording "contraband editions."
It’s one reason why I’ve always purchased physical media for music.
Eeny, meeny, miney, moe......
Banning books is terrible and awful and the same as Hitler. However, rewriting books so that they say the “right” things is totes cool!
How about burning books? Because the trannies and their enablers have been book burning Harry Potter.
This is all on people like Jeff, Mike and Sqrlsy, who've been making some particularly vile excuses for it here... at an ostensibly libertarian site no less.
Imagine what those three fucks say elsewhere, where they don't have to pretend.
And now we have the trans heat attack against the Christian school this is all from the rhetoric expelled by the hateful trans agenda and the DNC seeking political power. This blood is on the hands of the liberals and the DNC pushing such violent radical terroristic rhetoric. At the “Let Women Speak” rally in New Zealand the trans terrorists had many signs espousing DEATH & MURDER to those who did not accept their Trans-centric worldview.
The MSM will not show this - they will focus on the Conservatives, and will most likely lie lie lie.
If people are stupid enough to destroy their own property, then I support their right to do so no matter how little I like it. (Anybody who tries to burn my books will quickly discover I'm a big fan of both the 1st and 2nd Amendments.) As for authors, they get the same royalty whether you read the book, burn it or wipe your ass with it. They're crying all the way to the bank.
"Critics have demagogued these bills, like the the one in Florida, as "Don't SayGay"..."
That was sneaky.
I was going to point that out, but then I checked the author.
Of course, Robbie and every Reason writer knows that the parental rights bill is about explicit sexual references in kindergarten through third grade, but whataboutism knows no ages.
This is far closer to book banning than school libraries not carrying literary kiddie porn
Nubian? Not okay. Nubile? Absolutely okay.
"...attempts to remove references to LGBT characters in public schools and libraries"
No, Robby. It's removing blantanly pornographic materials from public schools. Books with graphic depictions of gay sex are not just "references to LGBT characters."
And the publisher of the class materials made the editorial decision on their own, to make a point, and the material was rejected by Florida because it was stupid.
Are you guys required by your corporate overloards to be completely dishonest and toe the woke line on this, or is it a personal choice?
I was going to ask that question, but then I checked the author.
Of course, Robbie and every Reason writer knows that the parental rights bill is about explicit sexual references in kindergarten through third grade, but whataboutism knows no ages.
Books with graphic depictions of gay sex are not just “references to LGBT characters.”
Well, you can't just have a book with a character that just happens to be gay in it. What's the point if you don't describe in graphic detail what the poo-stabber likes to do with his ding-a-ling? /sarc
Are you even allowed to write a book that doesn't have at least one gay character? And the gay character has to be wholly virtuous and never bad.
Not anymore. And eventually the "sensitivity readers" will insist that older books be rewritten so that characters who were straight are made into an alphabet type (only good characters, of course, as you say they can't have alphabet characters who are anything but good and virtuous).
If they can do it with comics and movies...
The BBC is already doing it. Changing characters, making them gay or black or Indian in period pieces where it would be extremely unlikely. Then they vilify anyone who points it out as racist.
There needs to be major reform to copyright law, a good start would be taking it away from anyone who tampers with an authors works and putting them in the public domain.
If you watch any sort of modern TV, no, you’re not allowed to write a story without a gay character.
Woke Hollywood has gone so far in their inclusivity bid that casts are already stereotyped.
There’s the dumb white jock, zany black girl, zesty Hispanic girl, overtly gay man, and all around woke Asian chick.
https://twitter.com/mr_scientism/status/1640019413398061056?t=NG6LTgknBnUEmDIxaaRhxQ&s=19
Geniuses: ”Conspiracies are not real, it’d be impossible to keep that stuff secret.”
Guy who worked on literal NWO-style conspiracy to insert population control messaging into popular TV shows openly recounting his experience in a freely available handbook for practitioners:
One thing this book makes clear is that the global dissemination of media expertise, including the production of entertainment, was carried out by NGOs, not commercial interests. Most countries have never known radio or television that was not Western propaganda.
Global entertainment media looks similar not because it’s what the customer wants, but because the people who produce it were all trained by Western propagandists. The messaging was disseminated along with the technical expertise and funding. Entertainment cultures reflect this.
[Links]
And the villain is a white guy, preferably a Christian fundamentalist.
https://boundingintocomics.com/2023/03/13/scream-vi-review-an-asinine-adventure-in-woke-stupidity/?utm_campaign=TPI03142023LB&utm_source=criticalimpact&utm_medium=email&source=TPICI
The main character of this series now is the daughter of Billy Loomis, Samantha Carpenter, who is played by Barrera as more Hispanic than Charo on an episode of Hollywood Squares. Meanwhile, she’s teamed up with Ortega, Hollywood’s new ‘it’ girl and quite possibly one of the most annoying celebrities to be pushed in recent years.
There’s also Randy Meeks ‘(previously played by Jamie Kennedy, who is now too based to be involved with modern Hollywood) niece and nephew, Mindy and Chad. Not only are they both biracial, but they’re also gay and apparently too strong to die despite being stabbed more times than the patient in a drunken game of Operation.
The diversity characters display a Jason Voorhees-like level of immortality and it makes the film feel like a parody-within-a-parody. The writers clearly put more effort into shooting a scene that lectures their audience about date rape (despite the fact that the college kid cited as an example was drunker than the girl he was trying to sleep with) than telling any sort of interesting story.
and the material was rejected by Florida because it was stupid.
This can't be said enough. Florida said this didn't meet their educational standards because OF COURSE you have to talk about race when you're discussing segregation and the Civil Rights movement, and they cut all negotiations with that publisher. Repeating the stupid talking point that they had to edit it because of the Florida law is insane when Florida rejected the materials and the publisher for doing this.
It's not insane. That implies that they actually believe it. It's just plain old lying. That information is readily available and can be verified, Robby just chooses not to because he'd rather lie.
The problem is, I don't know if Robby is lying because he actually believes the woke bullshit. Every now and then, he gets close to a decent libertarian analysis, but usually comes just short of "getting there."
Maybe he does this because he's just too much of a coward to speak against the woke mob.
Maybe he does this because he’s just too much of a coward to speak against the woke mob.
He doesn't want to offend his friends and fellow editors by standing up.
"Are you guys required by your corporate overloards to be completely dishonest and toe the woke line on this, or is it a personal choice?"
Yes.
Bullshit. Once again, the moralistas have tipped their hand. They consider an art class looking at Michelangelo's David "pornography". I think your typical sixth-grader is unlikely to be traumatized by a brief exposure to a little marble wangl
What's a nubian?
DAMN YOU!
Next there'll be some white boy invoking the holy trilogy.
‘… A similar law that restricts racial content in schools prompted a publisher to delete references to Rosa Parks’ race due to compliance concerns. ..’; This stuff from Reason is idiotic. An insider or employee violated the law and the publishers policies and removed the reference. “We find the omission or altering of historical facts to be abhorrent and do not defend it,” the publisher says in its statement. “Those unapproved changes have already been removed from our curriculum.” Republicans have nothing to do with censorship or the desensitization of prior works of fiction.
Of course this claim is rated as "true," on snopes, not even True But Misleading, or Partly True, just simply True. That's despite the publisher's acknowledgment that the person or people who did this violated guidelines and established protocols to force in this revision. Nothing can stand in the way of attacking DeathSantis.
"It's one thing to change outdated ethnic references or references that specifically malign a specific race."
It certainly is a thing, and not a good one. Sanitizing literature because it's offensive by modern standards is stupid, and makes us all more ignorant.
Sensitivity readers are editing for a theoretical customer who is maximally sensitive and not very bright.
One good thing about the implosion of the economy is that as businesses start to crunch, these types will be the first fuckers to go.
I don't think so.
They're not supported by consumers, they're supported by cabal interests.
A character in The Mysterious Affair at Styles who was referred to as a Jew—because, well, he is a Jew—is now just a person.
The Mysterious Affair at Styles was never written and is a global conspiracy committed by the...well, you know the rest...
People of unspecified ancestry?
It's fine, I can just check the "early life" section of that character's wikipedia page. (^:
Even if we take their claims of why they are doing this at face value, this is fucking stupid. If people want to read literature that is aligned with "modern sensibilities" they can read more recent books. A lot of the enjoyment of older literature is in it being different stylistically and culturally than what we are typically exposed to now.
Here's a question that seems pertinent: when they do these updates, do they get to extend copyrights?
I think that doing this to a work should *revoke* the publisher's copyright entirely.
Anyone who wanted to would be able to republish the original.
^good call
Remember way back when the Taliban were evil for destroying old Buddhist statues?
They should be applauded by these same barbarians.
The great irony is that many progressives are correctly outraged about Republican attempts to remove references to LGBT characters in public schools and libraries; critics have characterized these bills, like the one in Florida, as "Don't Say Gay" legislation. A similar law that restricts racial content in schools prompted a publisher to delete references to Rosa Parks' race due to compliance concerns. This stuff from Republicans is idiotic; it's also a mirror version of precisely what book publishers are doing to Christie, Dahl, and others at the behest of woke literary scolds.
Ya know, both sides, even if we have to lie about what the other side is doing in order to plaster in a both sides-ism.
A similar law that restricts racial content in schools prompted a publisher to delete references to Rosa Parks’ race due to compliance concerns.
But this is a true statement. What is the lie?
Well, let's go through the reasons.
1) A rogue individual or individuals edited the material, bypassing the actual publisher's guidelines and quality assurance. The publisher themselves said they didn't approve this.
2) Florida themselves said this does not measure to what is required by Florida's guidelines and is not up to their standards. The law does not restrict racial content, it specifically requires a discussion of the history of slavery, racial oppression, segregation, and the Civil Rights movement. Florida specifically said they are not considering that text or that publisher, but that they may consider the publisher in future years.
3) This was a proposed revision at most, anyway, and it was never printed or published. Therefore it can't be a true "mirror" because the edited, revised versions of Roald Dahl and Agatha Christie ARE being printed and published, and this never was. But Robby calls it a mirror even though it's not the same thing.
4) It's extremely possible this was done intentionally to stir up controversy. Rogue writers bypassed their normal editorial process in order to share a page online, that is quickly seized upon by a self-proclaimed progressive parenting group who immediately feeds it to the New York Times. I wouldn't be surprised if the person who made that revision is directly connected to the Florida Freedom To Read Project and sent this to their friends to share so they could show how monstrous HB 7 is, even though the actual change makes the text noncompliant with Florida law.
We don't know how "rogue" this individual really was. He/she could have been a patsy or scapegoat. What we do know is that this person edited the course material while acting as an official representative of the publisher.
irrelevant for judging the truthfulness of the above statement.
so the document was edited, the edits just didn't make it to the final draft. again, the statement is still true as written.
pure speculation. not relevant to judging the truthfulness of the above statement.
so like I said, the statement is true.
This is basically a Rupar. The statement is kind of true, but placed into context like A Thinking Mind did showed how minimally true it is.
And btw, using speculation to refute what you consider to be speculation is kind of a fallacy.
We don’t know how “rogue” this individual really was. He/she could have been a patsy or scapegoat. What we do know is that this person edited the course material while acting as an official representative of the publisher.
They had to violate policy in order to edit it. I wouldn't say there's anything official about violating official policy to force in your edits.
A similar law that restricts racial content in schools...
Bald-faced lie.
It's upsetting because Robby is sometimes the one who pushes back against this shit and says, "Wait a second, this isn't really what's happening." But he's actually going further with this nonsense than the original story. It's really disappointing.
We're getting really close to the point where even the comment sections don't make it worth the effort because the articles are so shitty and dishonest.
I think Robby is just a coward. That's worse than being a full-on woke zombie. Woke zombies are generally just ignorant and actually believe what they're being told. They're not capable of thinking for themselves and like the security and moral superiority that comes with being part of the mob.
Robby knows better, but he's unwilling to speak up, which makes him worse. He'll participate in something he knows is wrong because he's too much of a chicken shit to stand up to it.
This article isn't Robby's act.
Robby's act is the previous articles in which he "pushed back" against woke totalitarianism.
And lots of you fell for it.
Exactly. He's a chicken shit knuckling under because he thinks the crocodile is going to eat him last.
Remember the old party game - Who Goes Nazi?
Well, Robby just showed us that he would, to be sure, go Nazi.
“We’re getting really close to the point where even the comment sections don’t make it worth the effort because the articles are so shitty and dishonest.”
Isn’t that why that Glibertarians site got started?
The modern progressive tears down statues and rewrites classic literature in an effort to rewrite or erase the past.
Book burnings aren't far behind, and one simply notes this is an entirely one sided affair politically.
After all, we've always been at war in Eurasia...
It's not about content, it's about exercising power.
And displaying that exercise of power.
The Ministry of Truth is alive and well.
Unapproved words edited in the dark of night, with the truth being lost forever unless you happen to have an old hard copy.
Well, apparently the only real problem with McCarthyism is that it targeted Commies...
https://nypost.com/2023/03/25/uft-sponsoring-seminar-on-harmful-effects-of-whiteness/
UFT members who are licensed mental health professionals can earn two hours of credit toward their continuing education credentials, which can eventually result in a higher salary.
The workshop costs $25 to attend and will focus on “key cultural themes … related to the Latinx/e communities,” including “internalized racism, privilege, [and] white identity,” according to the union’s website and an Instagram post.
“Participants will leave the workshop with a better understanding of how to center ourselves as a form of resistance against the harmful effects of whiteness in our lives, the organizations we work for or direct, and the communities in which we serve,” the post says.
Replace “whiteness” with literally any other race or ethnicity, and you’re labeled a racist.
>>It's one thing to change outdated ethnic references or references that specifically malign a specific race.
is it? the book's o.g. title is well known so the title-change was a mass fail.
I just started 3 weeks ago and I've gotten 2 check for a total of $15,000...this is the best decision I made in a long time! "Thank you for giving me this extraordinary opportunity to make extra money from home.
Go to this site for more details...................>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
https://twitter.com/DschlopesIsBack/status/1640435529194913792?t=glA7jv6u3y46FlY3N1VTXQ&s=19
Nashville school shooting:
They know the DOB, address and social security number of the alleged shooter but they are still trying to figure out the name...
Right now we are at the part where the alleged shooter's internet presence gets scrubbed/altered and manifestos get written.
The name will be released after that.
https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status/1640445241508372490?t=S_vGrnM5NU6WVBU0dyY4Ug&s=19
*Unconfirmed* reports identify the Nashville shooter as “Audrey Hale”, a biological female that identifies as “He/Him” on their LinkedIn
Authorities believe the transgender shooter previously attended the Christian school
Instagram account “creative.aiden” has been deleted
Authorities believe the transgender shooter previously attended the Christian school
Explains why they've been slow to release details.
Also, I'm sure the narrative will be "something something ... christian bigots didn't affirm shooter's trans identity ... mumble mumble ... evil transphobes had it coming ... yada yada ... " and then quietly memory holed and forgotten about within a week or less.
Holy Fuck!
28-year-old Nashville woman
...
The Covenant School is a private Christian elementary school in Nashville, Tennessee that teaches preschool through 6th grade.
*If* she identifies as a man, she sure still holds a grudge like a woman.
Nashville PD presser described the shooter as "female like" which is far more honest than our institutions usually are.
It's one thing to shoot a bunch out kids to death. But for the shooter to be 'female like?' That's inexcusable.
Nice straw man you got there.
Even worse. It's a straw 'female like' man I got here.
Female grudges with male aggression is not a good combination.
I hope they also removed the word "fag." Not because it refers to homosexuals in Britain, but because it refers to cigarettes, and that's a really gross thing to have in your classics.
Or a piece of wood.
“At last reluctantly Gandalf himself took a hand. Picking up a faggot he held it aloft for a moment, and then with a word of command, naur an edraith ammen! he thrust the end of his staff into the midst of it.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring
he thrust the end of his staff into the midst of it
So he put the end of his shaft into...a faggot? Sounds kind of gay.
Not only that, but he set it on fire!
STD, or did they not have lube in Tolkien's day?
HEY! Faggot! They're not gay. They're hobbits.
An Academy Awards worthy ending...
Doesn't hold a candle to the original Clerks.
Kind of ironic considering Gandalf was played by a gay man in the movies.
Just imagine the shock those sensitivity readers must have had if Miss Marple entered a crime scene and noticed the spent fags scattered all over the floor.
"And Faramir and Éowyn stood forth and set hand in hand; and all there drank to them and were glad. 'Thus,' said Éomer, 'is the friendship of the Mark and of Gondor bound with a new bond, and the more do I rejoice.' 'No niggard are you, Éomer,' said Aragorn, 'to give thus to Gondor the fairest thing in your realm!'"
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
I watch a lot of British game shows (like Cats Does Countdown and Taskmaster) and I am always a little taken aback when I hear them drop “fag” in casual conversation. Haven’t heard it spoken like that since I was in high school in the mid 2000s.
https://twitter.com/alx/status/1640427165081583623?t=CEje8qMue1D8IESySlQQtg&s=19
In the wake of a school shooting, Joe Biden says he came down to speak because he heard there was ice cream and gets distracted by “good looking kids” in the audience.
[Video]
I haven't watched the linked video yet but the sad thing is there's at least 50/50 chance that's an accurate description of what happened.
It is.
He also introduced himself as Dr. Biden's husband again.
He probably forgot he was president again.
I thought for the first few minutes that he actually didn't know about the school shooting yet. But he was joking around for several minutes before talking about the school shooting. And then he just flips a switch and turns into "concerned politician grieving with the country". And then he flips another switch and turns into "professional politician giving an inspirational speech on small businesses".
It looks like the man is a psychopath with no genuine emotions. He puts on whatever emotional mask he needs in any particular situation.
I hear the "Don't Say Gay" law is preventing Florida school children from accessing the classic pro-diversity polemic American History X (including its oblique references to tumultuous race relations). Even just airing the scene of white people and black people just playing basketball together can get a teacher in hot water. Cultural libertarians like Robbie should be opposing the law and getting movies like that back on primary school shelves where they belong.
You can tell that was fiction because the white guys beat the black guys in a basketball game.
Also, the loss was respected and everyone left the court willingly. It really is a tale that today's children could stand to be exposed to.
Actually that's not what happened. They left, but didn't respect it because they went to the guy's house in the middle of the night armed with guns to break in.
^This^
"How do you stop five black guys from raping a white chick?"
Throw 'em a basketball!
Bring in an Asian person to get beat up?
Is nothing sacred?
The music of Lou Reed.
https://twitter.com/XVanFleet/status/1640426538515480587?t=ANCeWjLrlcS9W6F4adIX5g&s=19
The Wokesters are there for blood. Today it is tomato soup. Tomorrow it will be real blood.
It is a real Marxist Revolution. Make no mistake about it!!!
[Link]
https://twitter.com/pepesgrandma/status/1640445797056782337?t=Ya9Yfj1lTWkUT0Ukh2HckA&s=19
Proud boy hearing - FBI CHS who was a witness for defense says she was being sympathetic and not working for FBI at time. ????????
Whoops a second FBI CHS as a defense witness? Judge may let them testify under an alias? ????
How many fricking CHS were there! ????
[Link]
How many fricking CHS were there! ????
Most of their members?
We're just going to change the name to "Proud Feds" and be done with it.
Fed Boys
https://twitter.com/monitoringbias/status/1640403567679881224?t=pq7p1N0FtyHyCVzn2zlp9Q&s=19
The dominant political party in Scotland is now being led by a man whose chief complaint in this video is the abundance of white people in senior government positions.
Scotland is 96% white.
Leader of UK: Not white.
Leader of largest political party in Scotland: Not white
Mayor of London: Not white.
Still not enough.
[Video]
Keep in mind the leading Scottish party is also allegedly explicitly nationalist in character. It wants political separation from the United Kingdom. Granted it also desires to be subsumed into the EU. Being under a multinational government in London is unacceptable for reasons, but being under Brussels thumb is not.
The times are strange.
*All races except sub-Saharan Africans are considered white.
FYI, London is a city in England. Not Scotland.
Isn't it the capitol of the UK though?
Capitol of the Isle of Not Wight?
Humza Yousaf -- white
Not only is the man categorized "white" according to common definitions, he descends from the same people as much of the rest of Europe.
Fox News reporting that the "female" shooter in Nashville was in transition.
Is the shit gonna fly now!
If that is accurate, it will never be brought up again after next weekend.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
So what color is Little Black Sambo now?
"It's quite another matter to delete all references to ethnicity because… why do it? "
Why not do it? If the publishers think the new edition will sell and expand the potential market, it's unsound business not to.
Censorship is good if it makes people money is an interesting new take.
If the publishers are correct it will be a profitable new take.
Agatha Christie, a woke transsexual lesbian that wants to have sex with men and other diverse mammals. Confused? Not at all, a very normal person today.
I just started 3 weeks ago and I've gotten 2 check for a total of $15,000...this is the best decision I made in a long time! "Thank you for giving me this extraordinary opportunity to make extra money from home.
Go to this site for more details...................>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
I don't see what any of this has to do with libertarianism.
You can get AC's public domain works in their old form from many places. Those works that are still in copyright are legitimately controlled by her publisher. I recommend holding on to old paper versions.
As for gay characters, it is up to the taxpayers of Florida to decide what books to buy for public libraries and school libraries. Given the generally poor performance of US K-12 students, they should probably focus on basic reading, writing, and arithmetic.
Hysterics in both senses of the word.
It’s hypo at its finest when it’s the LEFT that wants to ban books, censor speech, redefine words, and edit history! Yet they gaslight and claim that it is Conservatives and Republicans because we want to not teach racist theories the children in Florida.
28.3.23 REASON SITE FROM UK EXPECTING ANYONE IN US OR UK TO WAKE UP IS A FOOLS ERRAND.IT NEVER HASPPENED IN 10.000 YRS.
Oh dear we vowed not to keep witing stuff on here cos its ignored but this sparked me off..'Christie' We were at one time very naive but kind. My family had been in Law.Medicine in europe till driven out. We were living in one room in London. What did we do whist trying to recover from exhausting work? We sat there watching Police/Crime/art/ sport/drama on our second hand TV. To us that was luxury. We did not realise the whole thing was a scam. We went to 'concerts' and thought the BBC wonderful. we even watched the 'News'. We were fools.but 8 yrs later we moved area and by chance started to have a stessful but more secure existence working 7 days a week 16 hours a day.. We still watched the same junk. Then we were approached by victims of the system who told us the truth about the society we were part of. We went down into the trough tween hoiw we were and how we were to become. We found out the hard way about Police.Law. Religion. politics. health.Royals Media.Charities. Local Govt. Affinity groups. Sport. Art Drama. Unlike joe public we got out of the chair and pursued the wrong doers which of course meant we experienced death threats from the HM Courts and violence from Police and violnt threats from US Embassy lunatics.By chance or by fate we encountered psychics who, much to our dismay told us what our future was to be. They did not have any info on us, not even a car number or tel .We woke up re Christie and her cosy Police. Religion HM Court. Lawyer scams. Where ever she is now lets hope she is paying for her antics. Yes we knew about 200 people at the crrpt BBc and ewhen we warned them we were told to hide the evidence abroad so now you know why they are in the Hof C where no HM MP will answer any mail. Got it or not? See you round the Wagner concert ? No not opinion its truth.reality. sworn.This is the last visit to this journalists paradise. By the way we sent out over a 1000 mails exposing the system. We got one reply in 20 yrs. It was from US.(of course) The guy said this- 'I Would Noit Want To be In Your Shoes i Pray That You Are protected From That Evil' That is the most honest statement we ever experienced.A woman actrees/model gets over 7000 000 mails offering dialogue.
28.3.23 REASON SITE FROM UK
Oh dear we vowed not to keep witing stuff on here cos its ignored but this sparked me off..'Christie' We were at one time very naive but kind. My family had been in Law.Medicine in europe till driven out. We were living in one room in London. What did we do whist trying to recover from exhausting work? We sat there watching Police/Crime/art/ sport/drama on our second hand TV. To us that was luxury. We did not realise the whole thing was a scam. We went to 'concerts' and thought the BBC wonderful. we even watched the 'News'. We were fools.but 8 yrs later we moved area and by chance started to have a stessful but more secure existence working 7 days a week 16 hours a day.. We still watched the same junk. Then we were approached by victims of the system who told us the truth about the society we were part of. We went down into the trough tween hoiw we were and how we were to become. We found out the hard way about Police.Law. Religion. politics. health.Royals Media.Charities. Local Govt. Affinity groups. Sport. Art Drama. Unlike joe public we got out of the chair and pursued the wrong doers which of course meant we experienced death threats from the HM Courts and violence from Police and violnt threats from US Embassy lunatics.By chance or by fate we encountered psychics who, much to our dismay told us what our future was to be. They did not have any info on us, not even a car number or tel .We woke up re Christie and her cosy Police. Religion HM Court. Lawyer scams. Where ever she is now lets hope she is paying for her antics. Yes we knew about 200 people at the crrpt BBc and ewhen we warned them we were told to hide the evidence abroad so now you know why they are in the Hof C where no HM MP will answer any mail. Got it or not? See you round the Wagner concert ? No not opinion its truth.reality. sworn.This is the last visit to this journalists paradise. By the way we sent out over a 1000 mails exposing the system. We got one reply in 20 yrs. It was from US.(of course) The guy said this- 'I Would Noit Want To be In Your Shoes i Pray That You Are protected From That Evil' That is the most honest statement we ever experienced.A woman actrees/model gets over 7000 000 mails offering dialogue.
Unless Reason gets a grammar sensitivity reader , it's just a matter of time until Robby wanders into a Vegan restaurant and eats shoots and leaves :
" progressives are correctly outraged about Republican attempts to remove references to LGBT characters in public schools and libraries "
Censoring and rewriting literary classics in the name of the bubble world of a handful of elitist twats, and common sense restrictions on what of books that are being given in a mandatory public education setting. Where issues of speech have no meaning... hmmmmm One of these things is not like the other.
If copyright terms were more reasonable, other companies could put out "Agatha Christie uncensored!" and the originals would be available for free on the Internet.
Go back to 26 years for the copyright holder and their heirs to milk their intellectual property for all it's worth, then make it public, offensive language and all.