Sen. Rand Paul: 'Dr. Fauci Is Disingenuous. He Is Conflicted.'
The Kentucky Republican also expressed disappointment that Congress has not repealed the war on terror authorization of military force.

Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) responded to the recent criticism he received from former White House coronavirus czar Anthony Fauci. In a new documentary, Fauci accused Paul of misrepresenting the science on U.S.-funded gain-of-function research, which Fauci says could not have caused the COVID-19 pandemic.
Paul disagreed.
"He's arguing a straw man argument," said Paul in an interview on Rising, the show I host for The Hill. "We have never argued that anything that's been published by the Wuhan lab became COVID-19. What we are arguing is that the lab in Wuhan has over 100 coronaviruses that they have manipulated in a lab and have not published."
Federal health advisers have not been sufficiently forthcoming about the extent of the grants authorized by the National Institute of Health (NIH) for research in Wuhan, China, according to Paul.
"Dr. Fauci is disingenuous. He is conflicted," said Paul. "The reason he is conflicted is that if this came from a lab that he funded, he shares culpability. He's been trying to cover this up from the beginning. There's a great deal of information that from January of 2020, in the early days, a cover-up began, and it continued for Fauci's entire term in office."
Paul also expressed frustration that the Senate did not act on his amendment to repeal the 2001 authorization of military force that undergirds the war on terror. The vote failed Wednesday night.
"The bill before us will repeal the Iraqi resolution, the one that says we are authorized to fight against Saddam Hussein's Iraq," said Paul. "The absurdity is that war's been over for 20 years, that resolution is very specific to Hussein, and we still can't get some of these neocons to vote for it."
To stop the United States' forever wars, Congress must repeal the "forever authorizations," added Paul.
Watch the full interview below.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Dr. Fauci is disingenuous. He is conflicted," said Paul.
Paul misspelled arrogant, conniving, and murderous.
Last month i managed to pull my first five figure paycheck ever!!! I've been working for this company online for 2 years now and i never been happier... They are paying me $95/per hour and the best thing is cause i am not that tech-savy, they only asked for basic understanding of internet and basic typing skill... It's been an amazing experience working with them and i wanted to share this with you, because they are looking for new people to join their team now and i highly recommend to everyone to apply...
Visit following page for more information.....................>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
"And I would've gotten away with it, if it wasn't for those raccoon dogs!" - Old Man Fauci
Remember when every MSM network played Fauci's "Senator, you frankly have no idea what you are talking about!" on repeat ad nauseum.
Those really aged poorly
Fox is certainly a mainstream media outlet: did they play that clip repeatedly?
relevance?
Do you dispute anything I said, concerning how ridiculous the MSM running cover for St. Fauci was?
I suppose you are right, Fox was the only MSM outlet that apparently was level headed enough to question the obvious bullshit and propaganda Fauci was spewing.
So Fox, unlike the other MSM outlets, was not following the pied piper, and were doing a better job of actual journalism?
Is that better? Was this a plug for Fox's superior coverage during COVID?
It is his justification for government influence over corporations and censorship. As long as one person says something government can censor the rest of the people per Mikes theory.
Thank you for not going with the conservative victimhood narrative that all mainstream media is liberal.
It's only 90%, quit whining, guys.
Is the GMA production team still wearing masks? Assuming that’s typical I don’t think we’ll ever see a stream of retractions.
.
The conservative junior varsity interviewing the disaffected right-wing misfit?
Must have been quite a show.
It’s okay to admit when your betters are talking above your grade level little Artie.
This is the guy that applauded the Branch Davidian incident as being justified. Take that as you will.
Fuck off and die, asshole bigot.
Sen. Rand Paul: 'Dr. Fauci Is Disingenuous. He Is Conflicted.'
Lamenting the he's not literally Trofim Lysenko, Fauci realizes that he can't have Rand Paul executed.
>>Dr. Fauci is disingenuous. He is conflicted
maybe. Fauci comes off as the true believer in Fauci.
When you're attacking Fauci, you're really attacking The Fauci.
will always be agog about that shining moment. I'd never seen a person who's never learned a lesson.
I believe that's commonly referred to as narcissism.
Conflicted, Senator? I disagree.
Fauci is a lying liar who lies about lying.
I think he meant conflicted in the legal sense. In that he has a conflict of interests because he was involved in the lab where COVID originated, and that kept him from being forthright with his advice. Moreover, it made him have an interest in shutting down what other people had to say.
Rand Paul is about the only honest Senator in that chamber. He is also knowledgeable and well-informed on issues, and being a doctor himself, he understands the Covid-19 questions he is asking and the responses (or lack thereof) that Fauci provides.
I remember when people were getting all heated about his verbal sparring with Fauci, and a fairly common refrain among the people defending Fauci was that Paul was an 'eye doctor', as if he fitted people for glasses at a LensCrafters chain or something.
He's an ophthalmologist, an eye surgeon. Associated with hospitals, Operating room access, you name it. And ophthalmology is such a difficult specialty that in the medical world, they are pretty much regarded as on par with brain surgeons.
Proving they're beyond parody: Dr. Li Wenliang, the Dr. who initially raised awareness about COVID and was reprimanded by the CCP, was an ophthalmologist.
Wow... indeed. those pictures of him on oxygen were poignant.
I was always a touch more of a Ron Paul than a Rand Paul guy -- but he seems really principled and also it's nice to see him arguing against the bullshit Iraq war and against Fauci in the same article.
When will Fauci resort to saying “What difference, at this point, does it make?”
Now we can see the final result of legal immunity for officials, whether absolute or qualified. The Fauci knows in the deepest darkest recesses of the pit wherein a heart normally would reside that He is Immune from all consequences of his lying about his misdeeds.
Why wouldn't he feel that way?
After how horribly he handled the AIDS messaging in the 80s, he was punished by retaining the highest paid post in the Federal government for three decades and capping it off with millions of dollars worth of television appearances the last two years.
There is hardly a better example of why libertarians don't trust big government.
Well put. Years ago I knew a group of southerners who were in Louisiana politics and became “experts on emergency management” because they (by default) dealt with Hurricane Katrina issues. (and they were total jackasses)
Last month i managed to pull my first five figure paycheck ever!!! I've been working for this company online for 2 years now and i never been happier... They are paying me $95/per hour and the best thing is cause i am not that tech-savy, they only asked for basic understanding of internet and basic typing skill... It's been an amazing experience working with them and i wanted to share this with you, because they are looking for new people to join their team now and i highly recommend to everyone to apply...
Visit following page for more information.....................>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
It's far easier to find Libertarians in the Republican party than is finding them at Reason Magazine 🙂
But today; Excellent person to highlight Robby 🙂
I would've like to have seen how Rand Paul would've panned out at election had he not given up so fast.
Nowhere. Because he has the charisma of a fence post.
I’m not saying he’s unqualified, but that people want to believe in the person they’re electing, and he inspires no one except for crazed neighbors.
Why does Rand Paul hate science?
ohhh because a-science is leeely difficurt!!!! (CCP endorsement)
You're mistakening science with The Science™. There's a big difference there. Rand Paul criticizes the latter, which is an established narrative rather than scientific truth.
It's always entertaining when people pursue pedantic "gotchas" that also require them to be purposefully obtuse.
The irony of having to be purposefully obtuse in order to be overly pedantic is fascinating.