Fewer People Are Going To College. That Could Be a Good Thing.
"If I would have gone to college after school, I would be dead broke," one high school graduate told the A.P.

Fewer and fewer young people are enrolling in college after graduating high school. However, while many have presented this decline as tantamount to a national emergency, declining college attendance rates may actually be a good thing. Lower enrollment sends the message that four-year colleges need to lower their inflated prices. Plus, the decline may actually be coming from students who were already likely to drop out of school without a degree. By skipping school, many are saving themselves from accruing unnecessary debt for a degree they likely would never have obtained.
While college enrollment rates for recent high school graduates have been steadily increasing for decades, the proportion of high school grads going on to college began to level out after the start of the Great Recession, fluctuating between 66 percent and 70 percent from 2008 to 2018. However, following the pandemic-era school closures of 2020, enrollment began a rapid decline. From 2019 to 2020, national college enrollment rates for recent high school graduates declined 3.5 percentage points, from 66.2 percent to 62.7 percent, the largest one-year drop in over 30 years. Rather than rebounding in 2021, the rate continued to decline, albeit at a lower rate, hitting 61.8 percent.
According to the Associated Press, college attendance rates have increased slightly in 2022. However, the decline has still resulted in panic from lawmakers and higher education officials. For example, in 2021, officials in Tennessee launched a "call to action" after finding that just over half of Tennessee high school graduates were enrolling in college.
"In the current economic reality, a high school diploma is not enough for long-term success," said one official in a press release last year. "All students can benefit from postsecondary education or training beyond high school to achieve success and provide opportunities for advancement, which is why the college-going rate decline and disparities should be a call to action for Tennessee and our nation."
While it's unclear exactly why more and more high school graduates are skipping college, there are a few theories. One theory is the impact of a gaping post-pandemic labor shortage has caused many employers to offer tantalizingly high pay to high school graduates. For many, this seems to outweigh the draw of college, particularly with average tuition rates being so eye-poppingly high.
That does seem to be a major factor for some students, like Daniel Moody, a 19-year-old who took a job at a Ford Motor Co. plant instead of attending college. "If I would have gone to college after school, I would be dead broke," he told the A.P. "The type of money we're making out here, you're not going to be making that while you're trying to go to college."
But attractive jobs aren't the whole answer. The work force participation rate among 16- to 24-year-olds is actually lower now than it was before the pandemic. While some students are giving up college for attractive jobs, many more seem to be simply doing nothing at all.
But there's no need to panic. Many of these individuals who aren't going to college or in the labor force may very well have ended up right where they are now anyway, having dropped out of school.
In 2020, just 26 percent of high school students taking the ACT, a popular college entrance exam, met all four "College Readiness Benchmarks" set by the ACT. These benchmarks are minimum scores on the test's four subject areas that statistically correlate with success in a freshman-level college course in the same subject. Despite only a quarter of high school students who took the ACT being prepared for college, over 60 percent of recent high school graduates were enrolled in college the following year.
While the two data sets aren't directly comparable, they nevertheless indicate that a large number of students enrolled in college aren't academically capable of succeeding there—and are, therefore, at high risk of dropping out. Between 2019 and 2020, 24.1 percent of full-time, first-time undergraduates dropped out, leaving with thousands of dollars in debt and no degree to show for it.
While data on the pandemic's effects on college dropout rates is sparse, declining college attendance rates may result in declining dropout rates, as those who would otherwise begrudgingly attend college—while being unlikely to succeed there—will skip college entirely, saving possibly thousands of dollars in debt they may have accrued from an aborted college venture.
"There were a lot of us with the pandemic, we kind of had a do-it-yourself kind of attitude of like, 'Oh — I can figure this out,'" one high school graduate told the A.P. "Why do I want to put in all the money to get a piece of paper that really isn't going to help with what I'm doing right now?"
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Staying out of indoctrination centers where your mind is turned to Swiss cheese while saving a hundred grand is a good idea?
Color me shocked.
Don’t be a doormat: https://tritorch.com/doormat
Indeed. Lower college enrollment has several silver linings.
1. It puts pressure on universities to eliminate useless departments, like sociology.
2. Lower demand may put downwards economic pressure on tuition costs. Which are out of control.
3. It stops dilution of the value of a four year degree. 4. More people will consider necessary alternatives, like trade schools. This country needs more plumbers, electricians, HVAC techs, etc.
Not everyone needs to, or should, pursue a college degree.
The only thing that will stop the dilution of a degree is the degree actually being relevant. Using a degree mainly for its prestige or exclusivity factor dilutes the value of the degree to being a simple dago dazzler (no offense intended to Italians).
Actually having some knowledge in your chosen degree after you graduate would also stop the dilution of a degree. Now imagine if people were even somewhat proficient in their chose field when they graduated!
The average college freshman in America reads at a 7th grade level
level
Competency % of Employers That Rated Recent Grads Proficient
Professionalism/Work Ethic 42.5%
Oral/Written Communications 41.6%
Leadership 33.0%
Digital Technology 65.8
Career Management 17.3%
“One theory is the impact of a gaping post-pandemic labor shortage has caused many employers to offer tantalizingly high pay to college graduates. For many, this seems to outweigh the draw of college, particularly with average tuition rates being so eye-poppingly high.”
I wonder if anyone will fix this nonsensical writing.
You mean just that paragraph or Reason writing in general?
Well, I can’t imagine why “tantalizingly high pay to college graduates” would “outweigh the draw of college”.
Begin now earning every month an extra amount of $17k or more just by doing very simple and easy online job from home. I have received $18953 in my last month direct in my bank acc by doing this easy home base job just in my part time for 2 hrs maximum a day online. Even a child can now do this job and earns money online. Everybody can get this home job right now and start earning dollars online by follow details here……….
Click the link—————————————>>> http://WWW.Pay.JioSalary.COM
Not a word about the risk of Title IX kangaroo courts or where the decline actually is (guessing the feminist indoctrination has something to do there) from Emma the leftist journolist.
Also, why would prices come down when you’re pushing to have infinite price increases funded by Uncle Sugar?
If colleges made significant cuts to their unnecessary expenditures, thousands of Black women would lose their good-paying jobs. That wouldn’t be good for Democrat politicians.
Wow, you took a completely neutral topic and turned it into a racial attack; how depressingly … common. No wonder ppl don’t take libertarians seriously; they read the comment sections and write the whole lot off.
Since when is that a specifically libertarian thing? You can read or hear that sort of derision anywhere.
True. Being a racist dickhead is not specifically a libertarian thing.
Speaking the painful truth is very libertarian.
Right. Maybe those thousands of Black women could be as productive as you and spend all day posting useless bullshit on a website they disagree with.
It would increase the supply of sandwich makers and pie bakers at the domestic level.
I know… Says the Nazi’s…
[We] can subsidize (STEAL) to save our failed Socialistic Ideology…
… because Guns teach kids. /s
Humorously they’ll remain completely ignorant and stupid about Gunning down the general public for PELL and FAFSA is what made it such a failure to begin with.
More Guns in people’s faces…. More Guns… MORE, MORE, MORE!
Dollars earning straightforward job to figure and earn on-line. begin now creating daily over $500 merely acting from home.~hn114~ Last month my earning from this are $16205 and that i gave this job solely two hours from my whole day. simplest way to earn additional financial gain online and it doesn’t desires any quite special experience. Move to this web site without delay andfollow details to induce
started right now……………….>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
“aren’t academically capable of succeeding there—and are, therefore, at high risk of dropping out.”
Dropping out with debt isn’t good, but colleges these days will bend over backward to keep students enrolled. I’m worried about the kids who go into debt for four (or five or six) years, learn nothing useful, and still walk out with a worthless degree.
It would be better to make the entire first semester a weed-out experience. If a student can’t hack it, then get them out quickly before they waste more time and money.
They would; If it wasn’t STOLEN money (someone else’s) at risk.
Something the student loan forgiveness act will grow explosively.
It would be better to make the entire first semester a weed-out experience. If a student can’t hack it, then get them out quickly before they waste more time and money.
A big part of the problem right now is that the high schools don’t steer kids who clearly can’t hack it academically into the trades like they did 60-70 years ago. The mantra is that “everyone goes to college!” and so people who have no business being on a college campus end up spending 4 years or more, and tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars, getting a degree that clearly doesn’t provide the rate of return that it used to. Hell, most of the bureaucrat class are made up of these types, and the whole point of those jobs is to get them into some kind of white collar work that they really aren’t qualified to do, anyway.
Not to mention the fact that colleges are openly operating as marxist seminaries now. What parent with any sense wants to send their kid somewhere that they’ll be indoctrinated with that kind of magical thinking? Just look at what happened to Annabella Rockwell; that’s millions of college kids nationwide. Why support these places?
Re: high schools, that isn’t true at all. I’m a teacher and we let every freshman know about the public technical high school that they can apply to and potentially enroll in for their junior year. I don’t know any teacher who “pushes” any student to college.
Re: high schools, that isn’t true at all. I’m a teacher and we let every freshman know about the public technical high school that they can apply to and potentially enroll in for their junior year. I don’t know any teacher who “pushes” any student to college.
Every freshman, huh? So nothing at all happens sophomore, junior, or senior year by their counselors?
And anyone claiming that students haven’t been pushed to go to college over, say, the last 60 years or so is flat-out fucking lying.
The more politicians take over education the dumber it gets. 30-Years ago a good 2-Years (and growing every year since) of a 4-Year degree has ZERO market value (GED). Everyone besides a politician would realize it doesn’t take 20-Years to be “Generally” educated and 2-Years to be career trained.
The last 10 years of education majors, government workers, and journalists do prove college is a bit worthless now outside of indoctrination.
You know it’s indoctrination because some TV personality told you so, and he also told you not to trust any other source of information but him.
No, you just have to read their Twitter feeds and watch their TikToks.
You’re a dumb bitch Tony. Aren’t you embarrassed by your own stupidity?
Great original thought. Tell us more about indoctrination.
Ah, the tactical ignorance employed by the left when their side is accurately described.
Folks, you have to remember that shit-bag’s acquaintance with reality is tenuous at best:
Tony|9.7.17 @ 4:43PM|#
“I don’t consider taxing and redistribution to be either forced or charity.”
On top of being dishonest, he’s just plain stupid.
If we could get college attendance down to about 20%, that would be about right.
Commie-College needs to be 0%.
Market value education at 100%.
If the “market” wants education that it values, it should pay for it. You know, like it used to do, when corporations actually trained their employees?
+10000000; Another way Crony Socialism strikes again.
Well Said.
you gotta stop starting sentences with However.
A Harvard english professor complained that his students couldn’t identify nouns and verbs while reading the scarlet letter.
I read that in 7th grade
in NJ it was 9th grade curriculum. in CA it was 12th
Forget 7th grade, that’s a first or second grade skill.
This is what happens when you democratize college and put physical characteristics and “lived experiences” above academic ability.
“A Harvard english professor complained that his students couldn’t identify nouns and verbs while reading the scarlet letter.”
Give them all a scarlet D minus.
(old joke repurposed for this thread)
“College for everyone” was and always will be a stupid idea. It served nobody outside the academy (especially the administration types), certain government agencies, and some politicians.
I see first hand what declining interest in higher ed can do, as the college where I volunteer keeps admitting students who are less and less capable, either academically or maturity, or both. The first to second year retention rate was recently only 62%. And this despite the fact that we have a captive portion of the student body that gets to attend for free (tuition and fees).
My realistic if harsh judgement is that most of those kids should not have been admitted. But then the college would have to downsize or fold.
Yankton College was turned into a prison when it shut down. Maybe we could re-classify colleges as insane asylums, since that’s how they’re basically operating anyway.
Or child care for 20-somethings.
+10000000…. Pegged that one.
Declining enrollment may be either a good thing OR a bad thing. Declining enrollment for the purpose of obtaining useless degrees would be a good thing anyway you look at it. On the other hand, if the rich parents of kids who want to have Bachelors degrees in underwater basket weaving want to waste their money that way, who am I to say them “nay?” If there were actually a free market in higher education the increased demand would result in increased supply and the price of various kinds of degrees would seek its own level. Also – again, any way you look at it – having a large number of non-productive people subsidized by government welfare and failing to pay back government subsidized college school loans is a bad thing. The solution – as usual – is a free market in education. The myth that “the public” benefits from “educated” citizens should be opposed and countered at every opportunity. We seem to be suffering forever from an extensively if not effectively educate public-school system and more of the same is not likely to correct the confederacy of dunces in charge.
Before panicking, the public should send a message to the high schools: “we’re upping our game, now up yours.”
Seriously, let’s see if we can make “lower” education better before trying to promote more “higher” education. Some things can be taught in high school, or in apprenticeships.
There are of course networking advantages in going to college, and specialized training which might not be available elsewhere.
Bottom line, different people have different aptitudes and needs.
College will I imagine continue to exist, but perhaps leaner and meaner, and with some dead wood removed. Or they could prop up the system by cushioning them against the need for change. Let’s see what they do.
Also, some colleges could try to improve their competitive advantage: “More STEM! Less Title IX! Less DEI!”
The problem isn’t really colleges. It is employers. They use education/credentials to signal prospective employees. But the fact is that they are simply putting those employees in a financial hole (which is the easiest way to hold someone over a barrel) rather than actually training employees. Michael Spence won a Nobel for explaining this. But he didn’t explain the real ugly consequences for employees.
It will take an entire ‘generation’ of the 18-22 age cohort to change that dynamic. And it will involve something like those kids going on college strike. Employ them as they are. Train them (maybe apprenticeships) for specific employer needs. The employers who succeed will have that age cohort beating down their doors. All other employers will be screwed.
100%
Hopefully apprenticeships and trade guilds will be valued higher in the future by society and employers. College, for most people, is simply no longer worth the price.
In Germany apprenticeships are not just manufacturing and trades. Banks, health care and services companies also have them
Griggs vs Duke Power is what put employers on the road to hiring college graduates.
I agree, too many jobs require more education than is actually needed for the work. Employer too often use a college or graduate degree just as a benchmark rather than real necessity.
Yeah more grist for FOX “I hate Donald Trump but I hate our viewers more” News. There are very few people with only a high-school diploma who can participate helpfully in democratic society. That’s why people should go and why it should be cheap or free. Just extending the logic of K-12 for a new economic age.
Vocational training can happen for everyone like it already does for doctors and lawyers, after students have acquired the basics of rigorous skepticism. I’m not saying it must take four years to inculcate this, but look around you. How many rational autodidacts do you see among high-school graduates?
The important thing is finding out stuff you never knew you didn’t know. You won’t find that with stoned self-motivated late-night Google searches.
There are very few people with only a high-school diploma who can participate helpfully in democratic society. That’s why people should go and why it should be cheap or free. Just extending the logic of K-12 for a new economic age.
The majority of the American workforce doesn’t have a college degree, and it clearly is a bad investment now, or your side wouldn’t be begging for debt jubilees. Although I will grant that college is 13th-16th grade now.
Have you seen the governments of America lately?
With the technology that’s coming and already here, we have to figure out how to educate this species out of its fairy tales or we’re going to kill ourselves.
Funny… You know it was Socialist governments who funded COVIDs creation right?
Problem with leftards is they compulsively think the curse is the cure.
The same way they think more Guns is going to save them from having to earn anything.
The same way every-time they F’Everything up they insist MORE of them will make it all better.
When [WE] do kill ourselves it’ll be because of leftard ideology and the ideological obsession with thinking Gov-Guns have the Power of Gods and can do anything and make everything.
Have you seen the governments of America lately?
Yeah, the toilet bowls that are the shitlib cities epitomize it.
“…There are very few people with only a high-school diploma who can participate helpfully in democratic society…”
Is that your excuse?
I recall a lot of argumentation in the early 1970’s over the claim that the Higher Education Act and federal student financial aid were going to result in the deterioration of college curricula and a rise in college attendance costs.
Hi, I am new here, just checking something out…
There are several nuances to this issue that I don’t hear getting mentioned hardly at all.
First, the more educated the public are, the better and stronger we’ll be as a democracy. I’m tired of education being vilified. That being said, there are many paths to educating oneself. It doesn’t have to be college. It just depends on what your career choice is (I definitely want my surgeon to be college educated).
Second, I’ve been a STEM tutor of college students for a while, and many students aren’t academically prepared for college. This factors in to the high college washout rates. It can partly be blamed on the disparity between schools in poor vs. upper class cities, thereby perpetuating systemic inequities between classes. But it can also partly be blamed on the way all public schools are structured across the country. Ever since “no child left behind”, students are just passed up to the next grade whether they understand the material or not, so the schools can meet their quotas. The focus has become either a numbers game for funding or a political argument among parents, all at the expense of the students. I’d rather see my tax dollars go to fixing the K-8 schools first before throwing money at colleges with students who can’t do basic math.
Third, I haven’t heard much about the fact that since at least the 80’s-90’s colleges have been price gouging and collectively price-fixing tuition rates, so the cost of attending college now is much more expensive (adjusted for inflation) compared to when you could work during the summer months in high school and use that income to pay for next semester’s school without needing much more help. Maybe the courts should look into schools’ price gouging instead of the government rewarding them with our tax money.
Lastly, if it’s going to go to pay for college, I don’t see why the money can’t instead be given out as scholarships for specific degrees and/or certifications that our country needs; like STEM subjects, teaching, nursing, electricians, building trades, etc. That would be a more practical investment in our future.
It’s largely government regulation and Justice Dept. decrees that have caused the massive bloat in college administration that drives up costs.
Agreed
I definitely want my surgeon to be college educated
I want my surgeon to be well educated in surgery, but I don’t see the need for doctors to have bachelor’s degrees before attending medical school.
Well, as someone in the Sciences who was once pre-med, you need the background information learned in the bachelor’s degree in order to understand the lessons learned in medical school. But that’s just a very specific example and I see what you’re saying and how it applies in general to a lot of careers.
“…I’m tired of education being vilified…”
I don’t see this happening; what I see is the honest evaluation of gov’t schools (such as you did re: high schools), and the ‘studies’ majors in tertiary ed.
That stuff AIN’T “education”.
Don’t get me wrong; I agree with an honest evaluation of the school system, and I’d give it a D+ right now. I’m just saying the goal of having well-educated citizens has been lost in our society. Schools, the way they’re run now, should be vilified- not the idea of getting an education.
Our country doesn’t need particular degrees. Specific employers do but they won’t pay for that as long as they can get someone else to pay for it and corrupt education so it serves them
If education was in the business of educating, I’d agree with you. You appropriately place (some of) the blame on NCLB, but fail to mention that schools simply aren’t even TRYING to produce a return on the taxpayer investment in them.
If a school can’t produce a useful and refined product (ie. graduates that can illustrate knowledge of literacy, mathematics, history, science, civics, and/or trade skills), it should be closed and its entire staff summarily fired. Said firings should go into consideration for future employment, and blackballs should exist for those who demonstrably do more harm to students than educating.
Education lacks accountability. That’s the problem.
Journalism is not a major. Maybe one course in how to write a news article. JS..Ms. Camp just drips with contempt for the non-liberal art intelligentsia. If we are going to keep colleges..engineering, hard science, computer science, and maybe business (keynsian economics is bullshit). All those other “majors” are a waste of money and provide employment to cultural marxists, bolshies, and degenerates.
Reason should take her up and fire Ms. Camp and hire a libertarian who isn’t a college grad…ok Nick or Matt?
This country place too much emphasis on continuity in education and so college follows directly on high school. It would be good to develop alternate routes where students take a year or two break to work and consider what they really want to do in life. This would of course require some reconfiguration of the existing system. Parents would have to accept having kids around longer. School would have to be more accepting of older students. Other things as well.