After Muslim Students Complained That an Art Exhibit Was 'Harmful,' Macalester College Shut It Down
"My artwork is unapologetic," said the artist. "Sometimes it can be very political. Sometimes it can be very controversial."

Yet another Minnesota college is embroiled in a controversy after a group of Muslim students expressed outrage over "offensive" art. Last month, Macalester College—a liberal arts college just two miles from Hamline University, where a similar controversy involving an adjunct art history professor erupted in December—briefly shut down an exhibit from an Iranian-American artist over student claims that some of the work displayed caused "harm."
While the school later reinstated the art exhibit, it wasn't without caveats. Now, pages of construction paper are posted on the glass gallery doors to block the work from view, along with a "content warning." The incident is yet another example of university administrators caving into unreasonable student demands and setting a troubling precedent that paves the way for further censorship.
On January 27, an exhibition by Iranian-American artist Taravat Talepasand opened in Macalester College's Law Warschaw gallery. According to a statement that accompanies the exhibit, the work "explores the cultural taboos that reflect on gender and political authority." It includes works like a sculpture reading "Woman, Life, Freedom" in English and Farsi, a watercolor of a man beheading two women, and a painting depicting a teddy bear and a Ken doll, called Mohammed Meets Jesus.
However, a handful of works sparked student outrage. Two drawings, Blasphemy X and Blasphemy IX portray women wearing niqabs pulling up their robes to reveal lingerie. A series of porcelain sculptures portray women who are entirely veiled, save for comically exaggerated breasts.
The exhibition "just feels a bit targeting because there's not that many Muslim students here," one student, who circulated a petition denouncing the work, told the Sahan Journal. "At a predominantly white institution, when I'm looking at who's attending the school, who's walking into this exhibit, without understanding and nuance, then it's quite harmful."
"The decision to display and continue to display this exhibition despite the harm it perpetuates is a deeply problematic issue," the petition reads. "It is targeting and harming an already small community that exists on this campus." The petition has so far only gained 80 signatures, but it seems this was more than enough to get administrators to act.
The school temporarily closed the exhibition, erecting black curtains to obscure the art. Later, administrators sent a campus-wide email announcing that while they would be reopening the exhibit due to "the value and importance of artistic expression," there would be several changes. The school has now placed several sheets of construction paper over the glass doors leading to the gallery to "prevent unintentional or non-consensual viewing of certain works," and posted a content warning.
"Unfortunately, as the Taravat exhibition was installed, we did not take the steps needed to demonstrate cultural sensitivity and awareness of the possible impact of the art. For this and for the harm it caused, we apologize," administrators wrote in the email.
Talepasand told the Sahan Journal that while, at first, she didn't object to the brief closure after hearing about the student outrage, "Nobody told me about the black curtain veiling all the windows. That's a whole other level of censorship." Talepasand also took issue with the phrasing of the content warning, which states that the exhibit "contains images of sexuality and violence that may be upsetting or unacceptable for some viewers." She called this a "violation."
This case is possibly the "first time a college has employed the curious phrase 'non-consensual viewing of certain works,'" wrote Sarah McLaughlin, director of the targeted advocacy program at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a First Amendment nonprofit. "It's, frankly, a rather sinister way to define controversial imagery: not just as something that could offend or upset, but as something that violates an accidental viewer's consent. It's a comically bad lesson to teach students."
While it's good news that Macalester chose to reopen the gallery, school administrators never should have caved to student outrage and closed it in the first place. Further, the use of content warnings and visually blocking the art still sends the message that if art offends students' religious sensibilities, Macalester administrators are happy to hide it away.
"My artwork is unapologetic," Talepasand told the Sahan Journal. "I'm making work that's finding the similarities, not just differences, between East and West and how, in a lot of ways, they parallel. Sometimes it can be very political. Sometimes it can be very controversial."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Get all government money out of education. If a then completely private institution wants to not display certain imagery, they can chose to not bake that cake.
Are you similarly ready to get all government money (and subsidies) out of religious institutions, or do you support snowflake-level special privilege for the gullible and superstitious?
(Smokey wrote this one, too.)
Fuck off and die, asshole bigot.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
I think Sevo beat me to it. So ditto mark his comment. The religions of woke, progressive, military adventurism, playing daddy and CAGW are a great start to end the subsidies.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
Yes Reverend. Most are private anyway and we should be very careful of giving any federal subsidies to any college or university. Give me a good reason to have any federal government subsidies. Let the states give subsidies to their own state colleges and universities.
Eat shit, you retarded commie faggot.
I’ve made $1250 so far this week working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’AM made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I do, .for more information simply.
Open this link thank you……>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
>>That's a whole other level of censorship
does censorship have levels? there are no small coincidences or large coincidences only coincidences
“Voluntary “ censorship.
So how come all the LBGTQEMSUYTE+ clubs never cause "outrage" and get banned?
So how come all the Jewish clubs never cause "outrage" and get banned?
So how come all the Christian clubs never cause "outrage" and get banned?
So how come all the Drinking clubs (also called fraternities) never cause "outrage" and get banned?
They don't ban Jewish clubs, they simply don't like "Zionism."
They only ban gay clubs if they're transphobic.
Christian clubs only get banned if they refuse to have atheist club leaders.
Fraternities aren't banned for drinking, they're banned for the insensitive theme parties they hold while drinking.
So, par for the course for most colleges.
ARTIST: This artwork "explores the cultural taboos that reflect on gender and political authority."
ADMINISTRATOR: Feminism-that's good!
ARTIST: It criticizes certain cultural practices often associated with Islamic countries.
ADMINISTRATOR: Islamophobia - that's bad!
ARTIST: It makes fun of Jesus.
ADMINISTRATOR: Challenging the Christian theocrats - that's good!
ARTIST: It makes fun of Mohammad.
ADMINISTRATOR: Exploiting religious prejudice - that's bad!
[steam begins pouring out of administrator's ears]
ADMINISTRATOR: So many conflicting messages...does not compute...I know, we must ban the exhibit and not-ban it at the same time, like whatshisname's cat. Which reminds me, I have to go home and feed *my* cats.
Someone taking offense is a terrible reason to do anything. I'm highly offended that the college bowed to this nonsense. Where's my prize?
Prize
How many points of intersection to you have in your bio?
These whiny Muslims are such pussies. For fuck's sake.
Who do these Muslim students think they are . . . Ron DeSantis and bigoted, slack-jawed Florida Republicans?
Yeah, all those slack-jawed Florida Republicans that chop the heads off people making fun of Jesus. Apt comparison as usual.
Open wider, Art. I'm not nearly done shoving this unbelievably idiotic prediction down your throat. 🙂
I wouldn’t mind seeing Judge Barrett confirmed, if only because I believe it would precipitate the installation of four new, better justices during the first half of 2021. - Rev. Arthur "Wish I Had a Delete Button" Kirkland
BTW how does DeSantis' education compare to Biden's? You normally can't shut up about top tier schools (despite sleeping through Larry Tribe's court expansion theory lectures) but for some reason you go quiet on the subject when a certain Florida Man comes up.
Just when I thought MTG was the lowest trash out there, Arthur comes along.
Every one of them an intellectual giant relative to you.
Strange how these controversies never seem to happen at medical, engineering, physics or law schools, You know, the kind of schools that have really hard subjects and the students want to get a real job.
Law schools have been known to have a few controversies. There was some fuss at MIT, but I'm too lazy to look it up.
You say these controversies, so, for sake of argument, limited to controversies about art like in the article.
Well, they don't happen at medical, engineering, physics or law schools because medical, engineering, physics or law schools don't generally sponsor art exhibits.
Law schools have plenty of free speech controversies and medical schools are careening down the oath of wokeness supplanting ability.
There has been, actually, recently an astrophysicist went on and on about whole the field was white supremacy. (Which is silly, given how man Indians and Chinese are in it, as well a large number of Latin Americans)
Neil DeGrasse Tyson would be surprised to find out that he's the new black face of white supremacy. Next thing you know, our president will describe him as 'clean and articulate'.
He progressived his way out of several misconduct situations by stating that he felt it was mutual when he was being handsy.
The President?
Or Mr. Tyson?
I was going to do some dirty astronomy jokes, but I presume Big Bang Theory has it covered.
lol
People who use terms like 'harmful' and 'problematic' unironically while describing an art exhibit would benefit greatly from the occasional random ass-kicking.
or a clue x 4 upside the head.
I’m actually a bit sympathetic to the “censors” in this case. We had a similar incident when I was in grad school. The business college opened their main hallway as a gallery for the graduate arts school next door. One of the arts students made a very graphic and explicit piece depicting a battered nude woman. The folks setting up the exhibit placed it where it could not be avoided on the students’ way to and from class.
A few called for censorship but the prevailing opinion among the business students was that the artist had every right to make and present the piece – but we didn’t want it in our living room. Display whatever you like in your space but you have no more right to force me to look at it than I have to force you to take it down.
The article above does not make clear where this “gallery” was. If they did pick a location that other students were forced to use, then “non-consensual viewing” may be an entirely accurate description.
Well, they were able to affix black craft paper over the windows and the lites in the doors to the space to prevent inadvertent or accidental viewing, so, it's unlikely that the exhibit was displayed in a primary corridor.
That seems pretty reaonsable. If it's in a gallery that no one has to go to if they don't want to, then I'm all for free expression, no matter how dumb or offensive some might judge it to be. But shoving it in people's faces who are just trying to go about their business I think makes a reasonable complaint.
Last month i managed to pull my first five figure paycheck ever!!! I’ve been working for this company online for 2 years now and i never been happier.They are paying me $95/per hour and the best thing is cause i am not that tech-savy, they only asked for basic understanding of internet and basic typing skill.It’s been an amazing experience working with them and i wanted to share this with you, because they are looking for new people to join their team now and i highly recommend to everyone to apply…
Visit following page for more information……………>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
"Yet another Minnesota college is embroiled in a controversy after a group of Muslim students expressed outrage over "offensive" art."
Minnesota? Also known as Somalia West. Used to be filled with the spawn of reformed Vikings. Now just a bunch of pussies. Who are all above average pussies.
ISWYDT.
lol, Garrison al-Keillor.
Anyway, who ever heard of immigrants being violent?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRjH_gJbUqQ
That kind of shit is a good argument for selective immigration policies.
Art has always been at least a little bit offensive. In the past couple of centuries even more. If the art is not making a statement that offends someone, somewhere, then it's not art. Heck, even Thomas Kinkade offends the art critics for his immense popularity. And we may forget that even Norman Rockwell had some controversial paintings.
So the New Proggie Identitarians are going to have to ban all art. Because it's all going to offend someone somewhere. It can't be political, it can't have images of any human being, and even landscapes are going to need to be vetted by a purity council first. And even the most bland still life can still be judged offensive if the artist zhimself had a problematic ancestor within the past seven generations.
Wokeism is the new Puritanism. But unlike Puritanism, there is no religion of salvation at its core, only the incessant witchhunts and declarations of eternal damnation.
Just like Puritan Massachusetts, there is no room for art or other graven images in the Woke World.
Or, put another way, people have always been able to find offense in just about anything.
True, but the powers-that-be only care when *certain* people are offended. When the plebes and normals are offended, there is no cause for concern. It is only when the woke and the favored religious minority are offended that something must be done.
The irony is that you are describing what art is allowed in Islamic cultures. There are religious rules for art in Islam. It's actually why those cultures tend to have magnificent mosaics and geometric art; it's mostly all that can be shown there.
Hence why Muslims in particular are prone to be 'triggered' by...well...just about all western art if we're being honest.
There are a few Christian rules for art as well, but they've been pretty much disregarded for at least a few hundred years by just about all sects except for the weird little one's or the outright cults.
Well no, it entirely depends on who is "offended" and who is doing the offending.
It's called "intersectionality" and historical retribution.
If only Maplethorpe had made a "Piss Mohamad" as an adjunct piece to "Piss Jesus".
He would have had his head cut off like that British soldier in London ten years ago. The one that was held down and decapitated by two Muslim ‘immigrants’ in broad daylight while British citizens stood by and watched, slack jawed' while they recorded it on their phones.
We need to get the Muslims out of this country almost as bad as we need to get rid of the Marxists (democrats).
Ackshuyally, it was Andres Serrano who made Piss Christ.