This Texas Bill Could Bar Certain Immigrants From Buying Property in the State
Gov. Greg Abbott has already announced that he’d sign the bill if passed.

As it currently stands, Texas law guarantees that "an alien has the same real and personal property rights as a United States citizen." That might not sound controversial—but a new bill is seeking to add some major exceptions.
Senate Bill (S.B.) 147, introduced in November by state Sen. Lois Kolkhorst (R–Brenham), would bar any "individual who is a citizen of China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia" from buying property in Texas. S.B. 147 would also block government and corporate entities of those nations from purchasing or acquiring property in the state. Last month, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced that he would sign the bill if passed.
When she introduced S.B. 147, Kolkhorst cited "highly disturbing" instances of foreign entities buying property in Texas and elsewhere in the United States. But certain aspects of the legislation are themselves disturbing, and its vague wording leaves the door open for dubious state action—including against citizens who have nothing to do with the evils of their governments.
Kolkhorst has stressed that "prohibitions do not apply to United States citizens and lawful permanent residents." Likewise, Abbott says the bill "doesn't impact at all people who either are citizens or intend to be citizens of the United States." But the bill in its current form makes no such guarantees or explicit mention of applicability to dual citizens. According to Houston's KHOU 11, Kolkhorst's office last month sent the station "a statement that said the bill will eventually make clear it does not apply to lawful permanent residents. However, her staff admitted on the phone, the bill, as it stands, makes no such distinction."
"On its face the bill applies to anyone who is a citizen of those countries regardless of their status in the United States," says David J. Bier, associate director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute. "However, contextually, it seems like the authors intended to make it an exception to the equal rights provision that applies to aliens." Even if they clarify that exception, Bier notes that "legal permanent residents are still considered aliens by the federal government" and that there seems to be nothing "in Texas statutes defining the word alien to exclude 'people who intend to be citizens' or legal permanent residents."
Those groups aside, Bier says the legislation "would cover every other national of these countries: primarily, illegal residents, student visa holders, and skilled workers without permanent residence." It would also apply to foreigners working as entertainers and athletes. "It's interesting that one of the state's most important athletes of the 2000s was Yao Ming," he notes, "who would be prohibited from owning property under this law."
Other Republican-led states have also begun to scrutinize foreign land purchases. In January, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis expressed an interest in halting Chinese purchases of farmland and homes in his state. There are reasonable policy debates to be had here, but the Texas bill lacks nuance. By singling out citizens and not just government-connected entities, it could very well end up harming foreign nationals who are fleeing the governments that American politicians want to punish. That could include people like Jo Jo Wang, a Houston restaurateur interviewed by KHOU 11 who says she's kept her Chinese citizenship "to make visiting family easier and to avoid communist government backlash."
State Rep. Gene Wu (D–Houston), who opposes S.B. 147, noted that "there is no discernment about what type of land is being purchased or who is doing the purchasing." Though a press release from Kolkhorst criticized foreign purchases of vast swathes of land near military bases and in agricultural areas, her legislation does not differentiate between those properties and residential ones. "It targets individuals indiscriminately," said Wu.
David Donatti, staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, calls S.B. 147 "an unconstitutional attempt to erode the rights of immigrants in the state." The Constitution "guarantees equal protection and due process to citizens and non-citizens alike," he says. "The discriminatory bill would prohibit members of our communities from participating in the Texas economy, including dual citizens and legal permanent residents, such as green card holders."
If passed, the legislation could act as a serious deterrent to immigrants weighing where to settle in the United States. As Stuart Anderson, executive director of the National Foundation for American Policy, noted in a Forbes column last week, "Individuals from the affected countries could start making decisions on where to work or study to avoid Texas," and "companies might become alarmed if employees are treated differently under Texas law based on their place of birth."
"Prohibiting long-term noncitizen residents from owning property will certainly discourage them from living [in] Texas," says Bier. Ultimately, that "will harm the value of property in the state and discourage business investment."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
How is this any different from what Canada just enacted?
Trudeau is dreamy, Abbott cannot even stand up for himself.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link--------------------->>> https://homejobs47.blogspot.com
Last I checked, Mexico doesn't allow Americanos to buy property in Mexico either. You can only sign a 99 year lease.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
Why should Texas be like Canada?
Two articles from Fiona today. She must need the overtime.
How much thought and effort do you think she actually puts into her articles?
1. login
2. scan social media
3. fire up chatGPS
4. submit article
>>Ultimately, that "will harm the value of property in the state and discourage business investment."
lol has this dude been in a cave? whole fucking world is trying to move to Texas and Florida right now
Currently DeSantis maintains a 2:1 lead with Trump and Abbott tied for second place.
So Fiona is a okay with the ccp buying land next to an airforce base.
Is Fiona the dumbest writer at reason?
Everybody is the dumbest writer at Reason. Well, mostly Boehm.
I'd say Binion is the dumbest, but Emma or Fiona are certainly trying to take the title
Can they still buy property in Martha's Vineyard?
Yes the immigrants can still buy land but after meeting certain criteria.
How many here are old enough to remember the panic over Japanese buyers of US properties? That whole overreaction popped when their economy did - and lots of US buyers and sellers made a tidy profit because of it. The best thing the government could do here is to stay out of it.
By the way, also calling back to that prior bubble - I don't see any way that this gets allowed at the state level. Whether and how to sanction a foreign country (or its citizens) is an entirely federal foreign policy affair.
What would be interesting is if a state prohibited foreign corporations from buying land.
Still a federal foreign policy matter, not something that, so far as I am aware, states are allowed to do.
●US Dollar Rain Earns upto $550 to $750 per day by google fantastic job oppertunity provide for our community pepoles who,s already using facebook to earn money 85000$ every month and more through facebook and google new project to create money at home withen few hours.Everybody can get this job now and start earning online by just open this link and then go through instructions to get started..........
See this article for more information————————>>>http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
And before that it was the Saudis. The oil sheiks in the 70s. Oh, so scary.
Post WWII Japan has been under US control.
China is a US enemy.
Additionally, the Yuan doesn't trade freely on the international market.
So, buying with Yuan, bolstered by Chinese government controls, isn't the same as having purchased with dollars earned in an open market. There's no free feedback loop to balance the equation. Hell, if there were, there would have been runaway inflation during all of those years of 20-30% year over year economic growth.
China can be treated with lassiez-faire policy when they're willing to accept the Remnibi isn't always magically going to remain at about 15 cents.
As an American citizen, try buying land in China. Or within 50 km of coast of Mexico.
I understand that Mexico has serious limitations on foreign landowning rights.
There is no landowning. At least it used to be that an American can only lease the land, so if you wanted to retire or have a second home in Baja the best you'd get was a 99 year lease.
I don't understand why anyone cares if foreigners want to give Americans money to rent land from the American government. What're they gonna do, ship it back home?
That is a significant rationalization for the Georgist land tax. Along with:
No one who claims ownership created it. Owners are simply paying govt to enforce their claim against other dogs pissing on the hydrant
No matter how high the tax, it doesn’t distort economic decisions beyond buy/sale. If the land tax is too high, sell the land. Then the government owns the land and can’t pay the tax. So it has to lower the tax to sell it to a productive owner.
With buying property comes political power.
China, Iran, North Korea and Russia are all hostile countries we are potentially going to be at war with
It's generally not a good idea to let enemies buy your land
Texas, just secede.
Good.
Surprising! I’ve been making 100 Dollars an hour since I started freelance on the Internet six months ago. I work long hours a day from home and do the basic work that I get from the business I met online. share this work for you opportunity This is definitely the best job I have ever done.
Go to this link………………….>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
Good. Let’s hope other states will follow suit.
Great. now deport anyone here illegally and do it immediately.
One country, one culture, one America. The melting pot is our objective not "multicultural" cultural marxism and CRT.
"It's interesting that one of the state's most important athletes of the 2000s was Yao Ming," he notes, "who would be prohibited from owning property under this law."
And it's interesting that Yao Ming apparently never sought American citizenship and went back to China once he retired from basketball. He has now been employed in China for a decade. That's a little longer than he played for Houston, and his Chinese jobs don't sound like private enterprise. Maybe he's exactly the kind of foreigner that the authors of this bill meant to target.
hy
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM