Children Lost One-Third of a Year of Learning During the Pandemic, Analysis Finds
"The COVID-19 learning deficit is likely to affect children's life chances through their education and labour market prospects," the analysis' authors argue.

According to a new analysis of over 40 studies from around the world, children lost an average of one-third of a year of school during the coronavirus pandemic. Researchers say the loss is largely due to the disruption and damage school closures—and the subsequent shift to distance learning—brought on children's physical and mental health. This latest assessment is further evidence that pandemic school closures contributed to historic learning loss among children—a loss that seems increasingly difficult to repair.
Published on Monday by the Nature Human Behaviour journal, the analysis compiled the results of 42 studies examining pandemic learning loss from 15 countries around the globe. It found that, globally, children lost 35 percent of a school year's worth of learning during the pandemic.
The studies also indicate that attempts to reverse the severe learning loss caused by COVID school closures have been far from successful. Upon returning to the classroom, the deficits created during the pandemic have remained "incredibly stable," indicating that pandemic-era learning losses are likely to follow children throughout the rest of their academic careers.
The deficits are particularly pronounced in mathematics, which may be because "learning progress in mathematics is more dependent on formal instruction than in reading." As the analysis notes, "This might be due to parents being better equipped to help their children with reading, and children advancing their reading skills (but not their maths skills) when reading for enjoyment outside of school."
Learning loss was more pronounced in the middle-income countries, like Mexico and South Africa, included in the analysis. Indeed, middle-income countries accounted for the three highest estimates of learning loss. Studies from low-income countries were excluded due to poor data quality, though researchers note that "learning deficits are likely to be even larger in low-income countries, considering that these countries already faced a learning crisis before the pandemic, generally implemented longer school closures, and were under-resourced and ill-equipped to facilitate remote learning."
Even in a high-income country like the United States, the magnitude of learning loss remained steep. One study included in the analysis found that the average public school student in third grade through eighth grade lost half a year of math learning and a quarter of a year in reading.
However, two countries studied, Sweden and Denmark, managed to experience no significant learning losses. Sweden famously managed to avoid most school closures during the pandemic and notably never closed primary schools. While Denmark did have school closures, one study theorized that the lack of learning loss could be due to the country's "reliable digital infrastructure with Denmark being one of the absolute top-scorers in digital skills, broad-band connectivity, and digital public services in Europe."
The COVID pandemic "led to one of the largest disruptions to learning in history. To a large extent, this is due to school closures, which are estimated to have affected 95% of the world's student population," the analysis' authors argue. "The effect of limited face-to-face instruction is compounded by the pandemic's consequences for children's out-of-school learning environment, as well as their mental and physical health… These negative consequences can be expected to be most pronounced for children from low socio-economic family backgrounds, exacerbating pre-existing educational inequalities."
Currently, the picture for American children is bleak. Without immediate intervention, "learning loss will be the longest-lasting and most inequitable legacy of the pandemic," Thomas Kane, a Harvard economist who reviewed the analysis, told the New York Times. According to the Hoover Institution, U.S. children attending school during the pandemic are likely to experience a 5 percent reduction in their lifetime earning potential—a number that rises to as high as 9 percent in some states.
"The COVID-19 learning deficit is likely to affect children's life chances through their education and labour market prospects," the analysis' authors write. "At the societal level, it can have important implications for growth, prosperity and social cohesion."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Around the world? Yeah, I’d believe an average of 1/3 year. In the US? A full year, maybe more. Though I would also expect significant variation by jurisdiction.
Yeah, seems low. My nieces in private schools missed about 3 months of in-person class instruction, the ones in public school, it was over a year of online baloney. Maybe they averaged it?
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
Why was this not done during the Hong Kong flu pandemic nor the swine flu pandemic?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,500 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,400 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.SmartJob1.Com
Not homeschooled children.
If I had to guess, I'd say around 100% of homeschooled children aren't trying to transition prior to the 4th grade.
Reason headline: Homeschooled Children Less Likely to Transition. Here's Why That's a Bad Thing, by Scott Shackford.
There would be eight (8) mentions of Trump in that article.
my office employment multi month prior, I was disturbed and an ineffective go after a quest for new employment I was secured this online position. what's more, presently I am ready to win thousands from home. Everyone can carry out this responsibility and win more dollars online by follow See this article for more information————————>>>GOOGLE WORK
Only if their parents were dumb enough to send them to a government school.
I resemble that remark.
Thank God they are smarter than that. Maybe it is because so many of them KNOW God. And DO what He says to do Things like FATHERS TEACH YOUR CHILDREN (instead of handing them over to m oloch, er squeeze me, gummit skewlz) and teaching them biblical moral principles rather than letting them learn them from.. da gummit skewlz.... and details like God mande man MALE and FEMALE. Count them, two models. ONLY two. And that all are sons of Adam, only one race.
Success! But at least they learned how to become activists during that time.
This year do not worry about money you can start a new Business and do an online job I have started a new Business and I am making over $84, 8254 per month I was started with 25 persons company now I have make a company of 200 peoples you can start a Business with a company of 10 to 50 peoples or join an online job.
For more info visit on this web Site……………>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
if the teachers union can simultaneously keep the kids dumb, not teach them any critical thinking, and to protest for the democrat party, they will consider it a job well done.
After all, what more would they want than a fresh new army of little soldiers who know nothing, dont ask questions, wear a pride shirt, black mask, trust the SciEncE!, and are willing to protest, burn, and loot for the left?
Its not at all hyperbolic to see them as a modern Red Guard, they are following the playbook to the letter
Yay Randi Weinergarten! We all said your continued shutdowns would hurt the children and now it’s proven you feckless bunt!
And she still has her job, her status, her salary and her fat pension. Who's laughing now?
They don’t know what 1/3rd means, so they’re okay.
As long as it's not 3/5ths of a year.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.APPRICHS.com
What's one third of zero?
The studies also indicate that attempts to reverse the severe learning loss caused by COVID school closures have been far from successful. Upon returning to the classroom, the deficits created during the pandemic have remained "incredibly stable," indicating that pandemic-era learning losses are likely to follow children throughout the rest of their academic careers.
That is frightening and shouldn't be allowed to follow children for the rest of their, basically, life. Yes that means I am saying this is a res publica issue - no matter what role govt may/not play.
Seems to me there are at least libertarian ideas to deal with this. But are there any libertarians who can pass those ideas into the public discussion area or is it all about a)pissing in the wind and/or b)posing angrily and self-righteously in order to get attention.
B) see JFree still claiming he was correct on covid.
Seems to me there are at least libertarian ideas to deal with this
Yeah, there are. Get your kids out of public school, like we've been saying constantly.
Better yet, ban state-funded, union-run, activist public education and save more kids.
Just banning public employee unions would make a huge difference. Eliminating requirements for university teaching credentials would be huge, too.
Shouldn’t be allowed to??? The time is gone. The damage is done.
I'm not so sure. Kids learn different types of things at different times in their development, some will excell at one thing and absolutely stink in another this year, then "the light comes on" at some point and they "get it". Part of the troube with gummit funded education is that they dump everyone into classes segregated by age, so they are all the same year age wise yet some are not ready to read, others not to wiite, not to do maths, cannot learn hisotry to save their lvies... and they are alllumped together in one group. Put that group on hold for a year things will shuffle about a bit. SUre, they won't all be "on the same page" after the break, but they will all have grown in their knowledge and ability to learn.
This whole "study" looks to me like a makeworkproject that was designed to "uncover" a serious problem tat we MUST FIX RIGHT NOW". One of my younger brothers spent most of his junior high and high school years playing hookey, surfing, riding his rat bike and skateboards, anything but being clamped down to a studid desk. He was allowed to escape school to join the Navy. there they told him he could not test for any of the special schools out of boot camp. He came back with the promise the recruiter had made tht he could at least test. His CO said OK them, pick the test yuo want to take but your grades prove you are too stupid to pass any of them or go to any of the schools. He signed up for diesel engine school, testing, came in top score, and was second in his cadre going through the school. At that point he did not even comrehend the need for a negative number. Out of military he decided to become an architect. People laughed.. the kid that could not comrehend the need or existence ofn negtive numbers was going to be an architect? Two yeara junior college he was top of his class with his AA degree. He became VERY successful, designing and building dozens of multimillion dollar single family homes.. one of them next door to a well known Frank Lloyd Wright home.
He was "out of school" for effectively four years surfing. Did not phase him in the slightest. By the ay those were Cal
ifornia government rn schools he was ditching, as often as he could.
Government schools do NOT motivate kids to learn. Some kids do in spite of the schools.
This study smells like a makework pilot project to justfy and fund a long term makework project to make millionS go up in smoke with no discernible results.
"...That is frightening and shouldn’t be allowed to follow children for the rest of their, basically, life..."
Agreed, and chicken-littles like you were warned that shut-downs were a bad idea with little to recommend them but assholish chicken-littles like you were too convinced of your infallibility and enforced them anyway.
You OWN this, asshole.
This is the fault of you and your religious cult, who believed chicken little pseudoscience.
This is also why we laugh at you people when you shit your pants about climate change.
Bad data, bad science, bad thought process. Purposefully used for no other reason than to exert power.
Fauci and the COVIDians should be swinging
"...Bad data, bad science, bad thought process..."
And government policies inimical to liberty, expensive, and ineffective!
It's a lose, lose, lose, lose, lose and lose proposition!
There's so much wrong with this, and at least half a dozen Reason articles to be made out of it:
Why would anybody who makes above median income want to live inside a government created slum? Are half a century of experience with social housing and urban decay not enough to dissuade people from this?
Move the reply button
Yeah, we were warning about this three years ago. Another useless "study" concluding the obvious; another useless Reason article years behind the commentariat.
Big deal. So now Jimmy and Susie (or Keisha and Jamal, or Juan and Juanita, or Death Muffin and Spike) will now graduate from high school with a 6-2/3rd grade education instead of a 7th grade education.
confirm the high school is a gummit run skewl and you've got it spot on the mark.
Well said.
That is sufficient to have a Randi Weingarten operative fill out their mail-in ballot, view TikTok and use their EBT card.
what do most modern useless sheep want anyways?
If you gave them all the choice of "you get nothing, but you are completely free and govt will leave you alone" or "govt tells you when to mask, when to cough, how to breathe, and when you can go outside, but you get UBI, a cell phone and internet...vote democrat" an astounding amount of people would take the latter.
So of course the public minded, child loving, (oops better rephrase this) teacher's union will soon announce that scholarships will be set up to provide free tutoring to all American children until they catch up.
Right?
This year do not worry about money you can start a new Business and do an online job I have started a new Business and I am making over $84, 8254 per month I was started with 25 persons company now I have make a company of 200 peoples you can start a Business with a company of 10 to 50 peoples or join an online job.
For more info visit on this web Site……………>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
That’s nothing compared to the four years of learning they lose by going to a US public school.
It's more like eight or nine years.
Purely anecdotal, but my own observation at the school where I substitute teach, and from listening to teachers, is that the worst impact was on the current freshmen and sophomores (pandemic 7th & 8th grades). The current juniors and seniors are either unaffected or resilient. I've heard from one person that the current 7th and 8th graders are doing pretty well.
Anecodtally, I'll agree with this. My daughter is a freshman and honestly hasn't really learned anything since the pandemic hit. She gets straight As, but the curriculum has been non-existent
Why is Reason writing this as if it were newsworthy? We all knew this 3 years ago.
And why do they keep saying the*PANDEMIC* was responsible? Blue state democrat governors were responsible for this. If the kids affected lose 5% of their lifetime potential, it's because those in power who made those decsions stole it from them, and for no real reason.
Fuck you. No amnesty.
Blue state democrat governors
And red state Republican governor Mike Dewine.
Yeah, plenty of republicans got in on the action too. Not to the same extent, for the most part. But this was definitely bipartisan idiocy in a lot of places.
I agree with those who say here in the US, the loss of time was more likely a year. HOwever, even one third year of lost education is the LEAST significant loss from the Covidiocy. Since most K-12 education is repetitive and redundant, that is easily made up. Far more serious are the setbacks to social development, and to the psyches of our youngest. Suicide rates are way up since the start of the plandemic. (sic) For that, I can never forgive Dr. FRAUDCI and all who (claimed to) believe him.
Also, how many of these kids were the victimized by lockdowns and other restrictions that put their parents out of business? Domestic violence, understandably, is also higher. As well as overall death rate (non-covid) approaching double the norm. Kids, if not murdered by the jab themselves (100X more likely to die of the jab than the disease) are in some cases, made orphans. The human loss, economic and social, is incalculable. The costs of the loss of liberty, not all of which are monetary, are incalculable as well.
This article is complete bullshit. It is gaslighting. American school children list the equivalent of nearly two years. This is widely known and not controversial unless you are a bleating sheep.
Man sure are a lot of admissions coming out right after mid terms. Masks really didnt work. Vaccines really didnt prevent spread or actually work as a vaccine. Vaccines actually did have side effects. Lockdowns did nothing while causing significant harm. Pfizer employees bragging about GOF for profit research.
A new Biden document trove (also know about pre-election) seems to be found every week.
Very interesting that is OK to talk about this stuff now, conveniently right after democrats have a historically great election for the incumbent party.
As long as it’s not 3/5ths of a year.
Reason seems to have fallen into the trap of focusing on how bad government can partially fix some of the problems caused by bad government. Maybe it's because Reason writers would have very little to write about if the response was always what it should be: "Government should stop making a mess of everything they touch." Bad education in public schools? "Government should stop trying to pretend to educate people." Economic disaster from a pandemic? "Government should stop trying to pretend to protect people from viruses." Endless death and destruction from the Forever Wars on Terrorism? "Government should stop trying to pretend it can make the world safe for democracy." I'm sure that's not very satisfying for someone who has chosen a career in reporting and op-ed, but "Reason should stop trying to pretend that Government wants to know how they can fix things."
"Reason seems to have fallen into the trap of focusing on how bad government can partially fix some of the problems caused by bad government..."
was gonna disagree, but saw:
"...While Denmark did have school closures, one study theorized that the lack of learning loss could be due to the country's "reliable digital infrastructure with Denmark being one of the absolute top-scorers in digital skills, broad-band connectivity, and digital public services in Europe..."
So, yeah socialized web access is a proposed 'solution'.
Instead, just before that:
"... Sweden famously managed to avoid most school closures during the pandemic and notably never closed primary schools..."
So a government "hands off" policy delivers the best result at zero cost; Reason should have been show-casing that.
Now is a very difficult time for the world and society, COVOD19, war, economic crisis, but I believe that everything will be fine
Step 1: fire everyone who thought long term school closures were a good idea.
I could forgive people a bit for freaking out in March 2020. By the fall there was no excuse.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM