Utah Funds Scholarship Program for Students Seeking Private Education
Gov. Spencer Cox signed legislation that will provide scholarships to K-12 students who choose nonpublic education.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox signed legislation on Saturday that will provide scholarships to K-12 students who choose nonpublic education.
H.B. 215 funds yearly grants of up to $8,000 per student (with some adjustments for inflation) that families may use to pay for tuition, textbooks, tutoring services, curricula, software, and other educational needs. Both houses of Utah's Legislature approved the bill by wide margins and, with Thursday's Senate vote, sent the bill to Cox's desk during National School Choice Week.
Utah is the latest state to pass legislation that funds school choice. Earlier in January, Iowa codified a similar grant program. School choice advocates are bullish that 2023 will bring more legislative victories for families who want alternatives to traditional public schools.
"Utah is the second state this year to go all-in on empowering families with education freedom and it's only January," said Corey DeAngelis, a senior fellow at the American Federation for Children, in a statement given to Reason. "Red states are now engaging in friendly competition to fund students, not systems. Iowa already passed universal school choice this year. Keep your eyes on states such as Arkansas, Florida, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas."
H.B. 215 also enacted salary increases for teachers. Nevertheless, the Utah Education Association (UEA), the state's largest teachers union, has pledged to "overturn" the law. Teachers at two Salt Lake City high schools staged walkouts.
However, the bill doesn't detract from public education funds and is no "indictment on public education," noted Senate sponsor Kirk Cullimore (R–Sandy). Indeed, nearly 97 percent of Utah students currently "participat[e] in public education in some fashion," according to Cullimore.
The bill simply empowers parents to seek other, more individualized, and likely better educational programming for their students. In short, it weakens public education's monopolistic tendencies and introduces more robust competition in the market. "Parents have woken up and are now freeing their children from a one-size-fits-all system that will, by definition, never meet their individual needs," DeAngelis said.
"This bill strikes a good balance. More than 90% of parents support Utah schools and so do we," Cox said upon signing the bill. "We also appreciate that HB 215 gives Utah parents additional options to meet the needs of their families," he added.
Many public schools and their teachers union pals will fail to compete with private institutions, and COVID-era school closures and learning loss have likely permanently damaged the former's reputation. Utah's scholarship program and similar ones will drive the demand for (and, consequently, the supply of) private alternatives. With such investments, the ratio of public to private institutions will rightfully be determined by family choice, not bureaucratic fiat.
Moreover, competition may make real the aspiration that public schools provide a higher quality of education. And as students depart failing public school systems, administrators will, perforce, hire better teachers, design better curricula, and better address the concerns of parents. The alternative—perhaps more likely in the long term—is to face extinction.
"I'd like to thank Randi Weingarten and her union allies for inadvertently doing more to advance school choice than anyone could have ever imagined," DeAngelis said. "They overplayed their hand and sparked a parent revolution. The kids now have a union of their own: parents."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Eliminate public funding of education. Your kids, you educate them yourself or pay someone with your money to do so.
Funding, control, and running are separate issues. As long as the funding follows students, it's much less important, although still unfair.
The most important step is not having government-run schools, allowing school choice, including home schooling.
It would also be great to get government out of dictating education goals, such as standardized reading writing and arithmetic tests. But that is a harder sell.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.APPRICHS.com
It would also be great to get government out of dictating education goals, such as standardized reading writing and arithmetic tests. But that is a harder sell.
So which is it? Do you think it's a harder sell because the public is too stupid to understand your great idea or, because it's a hard sell, it's probably really not all that great?
Most people don't see standardized 3Rs testing as problematic. Two things could change this:
A: If the wokies start standardized testing on CRT, DEI, gender fluidentity, etc, that will change in a hurry.
B: As more and more people avoid government schools and the public discovers that home-schooled students aren't rabid neonazi mass shooters.
But right now, the public thinks it is good, for vague reasons. This is my gut feeling.
A already happened, when parents complained they were labeled domestic terrorists
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.SmartJob1.Com
"Eliminate public funding of education."
Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, et al, respectively disagree.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
I think I flagged that spam before it could be edited. Said "14 secs ago". This will be interesting.
Home earnings allow all people to paint on-line and acquire weekly bills to financial institutions. Earn over $500 each day and get payouts each week instantly to account for financial institutions. (bwj-03) My remaining month of earnings was $30,390 and all I do is paint for as much as four hours an afternoon on my computer. Easy paintings and constant earnings are exquisite with this job.
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
I respectfully disagree with both of them on legalizing slavery.
non sequitur
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://Www.workstar24.com
It calls into question “relevant authority.”
Hmm.. “relevant.”
So, the populous in townships, in New England, staring in the 1780’s, lacked the authority to fund their local schools? The State of North Carolina lacked the authority to charter the North Carolina University at Chapel Hill in 1789?
Their extreme wealth redistribution laws were made illegal where the current ones to fund expensive daycare can be too.
"Their..."
Who is "Their?" New England townships in the 1780's, or the State of North Carolina? Cite, please... Tarheels want to know!
Jefferson, Adams et. al.
so? no one is right on everything.
This is the way, Utah.
Good for Cox, even with his pronouns profile
++
The bill is a scholarship with a limit of 5000 qualified students.
it's not nearly the big deal it's being touted as.
Yeah, but it's a start....
Once again Reason fails the libertarian-purity-test. True libertarians want no public funding of school at all. Nada. They do not see education as a public good. Nope. That's impure. Heresy. Blasphemy. Oh, and MAGA 2024!
Yeah. Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, and other Founders - all leftist socialists whatchamacallits...
They didn't vote for Trump. That automatically makes them leftists.
Educating yourself and your children is your obligation. I’m fine if you want to teach CRT, trans bathroom pronouns, etc. as long as I’m not coerced into funding it. Though I’d still support prosecution of molesting teachers. Free markets, free minds.
"Public funding" of education does not necessarily mean big, government-run schools. It used to be that towns and counties, even local communities, had control over their public schools. In many areas (most?), this is no longer the case. And with, first, the States, and, more recently, the Feds seeking to gain more and more control over local schools, the system is pretty-well shot.
This was not the Founders view of "publicly-funded schools." Giving parents' more choice is a step in the right direction. Lots of things are publicly-funded, like many hospitals and virtually all law-enforcement agencies, and the government itself. These are usually seen as part if the "commons." I won't even get into "publicly-funded" road systems. Somebody has to fund "the commons."
I wish I didn't have to fund a near trillion-dollar-a-year military-industrial establishment, but, se la vie.
Education can be done at the home that is effective, inexpensive and without coercive funding. National defense probably can’t be done at the individual level. I think we both agree the current defense spending is way too much. Neo imperialism, providing funds to friends and bolstering MIC share prices isn’t cheap.
In a Free Market system, a locality could create its own non-government funded public school. Few masters to pay where those attending see smaller costs than the current government equivalent. The paying locals could decide the curriculum.
Roads are mostly paid for via a use tax. Iirc, they used to be completely but the fuel taxes no longer cover the expenses.
"In a Free Market system, a locality could create its own non-government funded public school. Few masters to pay where those attending see smaller costs than the current government equivalent. The paying locals could decide the curriculum."
Now, I LIKE this. Making it work might be problematic (but then, what isn't?)
One thing though, everybody pays for taxes on roads. Even if they don't own a car, they pay, indirectly, by covering the increased cost of having things delivered to their town, their local store, or to their home.
Public Education (in its basic form, such as the 3Rs, mentioned by Sarc), benefits everybody in society, at least in theory. Most folks assume that the folks they meet on the street can read and write and solve basic mathematics problems, have some inking of the way the government operates, some notion about the Bill of Rights, etc. This strengthens society. It serves the common good. These days, just about any employer assumes that a applicant would have some knowledge of basic computers, as well.
There is an adage about education:
While the manifest function of public schools is that of education, the latent function of public schools is that of socialization, meaning teaching us how to get along with each other.
In both functions, today's system seems to be somewhat lacking. I think we can probably both agree on that.
A system requiring the users to pay their costs won’t fly in education unless/until a system collapse. The money and forced indoctrination are too much. Perhaps as more move away from the government system more folks will follow.
Regarding roads, yup. I think it works fairly well. One pays for how much they use.
Given the need for the basic skills, it is imperative that each parent provide those to their children and each person without those level themselves up.
Being forced to sit in a room with same aged students and an authority figure often there for a benefits package is poor life preparation imo.
Ya know Tom, hindsight is 20/20. But you could have been a little more forward looking with that whole constitution thing. I know quill pens can be tricky but a few more periods like maybe in the BOL would have been pretty helpful. Just sayin.
I think there is a public good argument to be made for basic education. The three R's. Those are skills that you need to be a productive member of society. Someone who is intellectually curious can use those skills to further their education. Someone else can become an apprentice. But they're not very useful if they lack literacy and numeracy. Keep the minimum educational expectations simple and there's nothing to argue about.
The three R’s.
Reidentify, reaffirm and reassign.
The majority of Americans takes more out of the govt system than what they put back in. Perhaps they are productive in that they help justify positions for govt employees. Taught at home. Formal homeschooling. Private school. The proposed community school where parents pay the low overhead costs. Probably other options.
They will miss out on indoctrination, CRT, trans pronouns, trans restrooms, rapey trans students, rapey teachers, spineless administrators, rapey administrators, and trans sports team debates all without coerced funding and public sector unions seeking even more money.
How many teachers were molested last year?
To Diane Reynolds,
I get your sarcasm.
However, numerous teachers were assaulted by students last year.
A six year old even shot their teacher after the first threatening to burn her to death.
And there’s a humorous video of an African-American girl assaulting a 300 pound African-American teacher and breaking the teachers leg.
While practically the entire class films the event and laughs about it.
There’s certainly no learning going on in that school
If there is anything Utah can't stand, it is reason-based education.
Well, that and modern America.
Nice to show your colors there, anti-LDS bigot.
Maybe Utah can emulate the winners of the culture war like Chicago and see their murder rate improve.
So they can get a private education but they can't get gender affirming health care. All of these children will be forced to graduate with their genitalia and breasts intact. What's so great about that? Will they at least be able to learn CRT aka Black history?
"How dare you force us to actually compete to determine who gets to indoctrinate, er, I mean, educate kids! WAHHHHHH!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!"
Meanwhile KY’s Supreme Court decided that allowing tax credits for families of private school students violates the state constitution which states that the state cannot fund any schooling outside of public schooling.
Keeping your own money is apparently state funding.
Fuck all these people.
hi
https://www.warriorforum.com/members/web%20uric.html?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=user-menu&utm_campaign=user-profile
Education in our society has a great value, I think it is very good that our young people have the opportunity to choose what to study, for example, I am 37 years old, I would like to learn something new, now I would like to learn programming, and now there are many scams, people they just make money from it and give low quality education!! Maybe you know where it could be studied?
Hi, unfortunately it’s true, it’s hard to find a good training product now, it’s cool that you chose programming, I’d like to learn it too, but I don’t have much time, unfortunately I can’t recommend a good programming training, but for my project I used the services of https://evnedev.com/services/saas-application-development-company/Satisfied, everything was done on time and with high quality. Maybe they will help you
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
I am making $162/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply
COPY AND OPEN THIS SITE________ http://Www.Smartcash1.com